Bovine Science with BCI

BCI Cattle Chat

Listen to veterinary professionals from the Beef Cattle Institute at Kansas State University talk about a variety of topics within cattle health, nutrition, reproduction, and science. New episodes of Bovine Science with BCI are posted each Monday.

  1. 4d ago

    The Mystery Eye Disease Outbreak: Investigating a Point-Source Event in Stocker Cattle

    This case study follows the investigation of a puzzling eye disease outbreak affecting approximately 10% of a group of 1,200 stocker cattle shortly after processing and placement on pasture. The affected animals developed severe eye lesions, including corneal cloudiness, swollen eyelids, redness, and inflammation, but lacked many of the classic ulcers typically associated with pinkeye. Because cases appeared almost simultaneously across numerous pastures separated by up to 90 miles, investigators quickly determined the outbreak did not fit the pattern of a contagious, spreading disease. Instead, the timing and distribution suggested a point-source event linked to something the cattle experienced while gathered together during processing. Common causes such as pinkeye, infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR), and mycoplasma infections were initially considered, but diagnostic testing failed to identify a clear infectious agent. Necropsies, histopathology, and laboratory testing revealed unusual eye lesions but provided no definitive diagnosis. The investigation expanded to include less common possibilities such as malignant catarrhal fever and even immune-mediated eye disease, although evidence remained inconclusive. Interestingly, the outbreak peaked about two weeks after processing and then rapidly subsided without continuing spread, further supporting the point-source theory. The discussion highlights the importance of using epidemiology, history, and case patterns to guide investigations when laboratory answers are unavailable. Ultimately, while the exact cause remained unknown, the case demonstrates how understanding disease patterns can help narrow possibilities and inform future management decisions.

  2. Jul 28

    Strategic Heifer Development: Can Stair-Step Nutrition Improve Puberty Rates and Reduce Feed Costs?

    This episode examines a study evaluating different nutritional strategies for developing replacement heifers and their impact on puberty attainment. Researchers compared traditional low-gain and high-gain feeding programs with two “stair-step” nutritional approaches that alternated periods of higher and lower energy intake. The goal was to determine whether strategic feeding could achieve the same reproductive outcomes as intensive feeding while using fewer resources. Results showed that the first stair-step program, which provided a higher plane of nutrition immediately after weaning followed by alternating periods of lower and higher gain, achieved puberty rates nearly identical to the continuously high-fed control group. In fact, 100% of the heifers in both groups reached puberty by approximately 13 months of age, while less than half of the low-control heifers achieved puberty during the study period. The stair-step strategy accomplished this while utilizing less feed and producing lower body condition scores than the continuously high-fed heifers. The findings suggest that the period immediately after weaning may be especially important for influencing reproductive development. Researchers also observed unique responses in leptin levels, indicating that strategic nutritional changes may affect hormonal pathways involved in puberty onset. While the results are promising, the discussion notes that implementing a stair-step program requires careful management and dietary transitions to achieve the desired outcomes. Overall, the study highlights how targeted nutrition can potentially improve heifer development efficiency while maintaining strong reproductive performance.

  3. Jul 20

    More Than Stocking Density: How Pen Size Influences Puberty in Replacement Heifers

    This episode examines a study investigating whether the physical size of dry lot pens affects the development of replacement heifers, even when animal density remains the same. Researchers compared heifers housed in a standard-sized dry lot, a larger dry lot with the same space per animal, and a pasture-based control group. While growth performance and weight gain were similar across treatments, important differences emerged in behavior, stress indicators, and reproductive development. Heifers housed in the smaller dry lot reached puberty approximately 20–30 days later than those in the larger pen or pasture groups. The larger dry lot group, despite having the same stocking density, performed similarly to the pasture group in many reproductive measures. Researchers also observed higher cortisol levels and increased expression of stress-related heat shock proteins in the heifers housed in the smaller pen, suggesting greater physiological stress. The findings indicate that total pen area—not just square footage per animal—may influence social interactions, stress levels, and the timing of puberty. The authors speculate that larger pens may allow animals more opportunity to avoid dominant pen mates and reduce social stress. Overall, the study suggests that facility design can have meaningful effects on replacement heifer development and that evaluating pen size may be just as important as considering stocking density alone.

  4. Jul 13

    A Deadly Feed Mixing Mistake: Investigating Sudden Cattle Deaths in a Dry Lot

    This case study examines a sudden and devastating loss in which five cows and two calves died shortly after being moved to a dry lot following the calving season. The affected group consisted of only six cow-calf pairs that had been separated because they were open or had calved late, making the rapid mortality highly suspicious for a toxic exposure rather than an infectious disease. Necropsies revealed few significant findings, while the only surviving cow showed severe neurological signs, including tremors, vocalization, and an inability to stand. Investigators focused on feed and water as the most likely sources of exposure and collected samples from the animals, feed, and environment for evaluation. During the investigation, foreign granules were discovered in the feed bunk and were ultimately traced back to agricultural pesticide residue left inside a skid steer bucket. The bucket had previously been used to handle granular pesticide from corn planting operations and was later used to deliver feed without being adequately cleaned. The pesticide contamination explained the rapid onset of deaths and neurological symptoms observed in the remaining cow. The discussion highlights how potent agricultural chemicals can become deadly when accidentally introduced into livestock feed, even in relatively small amounts. A key takeaway is the importance of maintaining dedicated equipment for feed handling whenever possible or thoroughly cleaning equipment used for agricultural chemicals before reusing it. The case also demonstrates the value of careful history-taking and field investigation, which often provide the answers before laboratory testing is even completed.

  5. Jul 6

    Written Grazing Plans and Profitability: What Drives Adoption on Cow-Calf Operations?

    This episode examines research exploring why some cow-calf producers adopt written grazing management plans while others do not. The study was motivated in part by sustainability goals aimed at improving grazing land management, soil health, water infiltration, and drought resilience through more structured planning. Researchers analyzed survey data from producers across the United States to identify factors associated with both written grazing plans and intensive grazing practices. Results showed that larger land holdings were associated with a greater likelihood of having a grazing management plan, while larger herd sizes were somewhat less likely to adopt one. Producers using rotational or management-intensive grazing systems were also more likely to have written plans, suggesting that planning and intensive grazing management often go hand in hand. The study found relatively few strong demographic influences, indicating that adoption is driven more by management style and operational goals than by age or experience alone. One of the most important findings was that producers with either a mental or written grazing plan were more likely to achieve positive returns over off-farm feed costs than those with no grazing plan at all. Operations that regularly evaluated and updated their plans also showed stronger economic performance. The discussion emphasizes that written grazing plans do not need to be rigid prescriptions, but rather flexible tools that help producers track forage resources, adjust management over time, and make more informed decisions. Overall, the research suggests that thoughtful grazing planning can benefit both ranch profitability and long-term resource stewardship.

  6. Jun 29

    Heifer Selection for Profit: Why Hybrid Vigor, Longevity, and Efficiency Matter

    This discussion examines a research study focused on improving long-term profitability in cow-calf operations through better heifer selection. The study used economic modeling and field data to evaluate three key factors: feed efficiency, longevity, and heterosis (hybrid vigor). Results showed that cows with greater genetic diversity consistently generated higher returns, largely due to improved reproductive performance and overall herd productivity. Longevity also played a critical role, as cows that remained productive in the herd longer were able to spread their development costs over more calves. However, the study revealed that heterosis had a larger impact on profitability than longevity alone when multiple factors were considered together. Feed efficiency, measured as the ability to maintain condition on less forage, also contributed positively to economic outcomes, particularly during winter feeding periods. An important takeaway is that assumptions from feedlot cattle efficiency do not always translate directly to grazing cows due to differences in diet and digestion. The discussion also emphasizes the importance of crossbreeding strategies, warning that repeatedly using similar genetics can reduce hybrid vigor over time. Overall, the episode highlights that strategic heifer selection—focused on genetic diversity, reproductive success, and efficiency—can significantly improve herd profitability over the long term.

  7. Jun 22

    Saline vs. PBS: A Practical Test of Sample Collection Methods in Cattle Diagnostics

    This episode explores a research study evaluating whether sterile saline can effectively replace phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) for collecting samples used in Tritrichomonas PCR testing. The discussion highlights a non-inferiority trial design, which differs from traditional statistical approaches by testing whether one method is not meaningfully worse than another. Researchers created controlled samples with varying concentrations of organisms and compared detection results using both saline and PBS. Results showed no significant difference in detection performance between the two media, and saline met the criteria for being “not inferior” to PBS. This finding is important because saline is more readily available and easier to use in field conditions for veterinarians. The discussion also explains how PCR cycle threshold values work and why small differences can matter depending on diagnostic cutoffs. However, the applicability of these findings depends on the specific testing method, as saline may not perform as well in DNA-based PCR due to potential degradation. Overall, the study provides practical insight into improving diagnostic efficiency while emphasizing the importance of understanding both statistical methods and biological relevance in veterinary research.

  8. Jun 15

    Systems Thinking in Beef Production: Solving Problems Beyond the Individual Animal

    This discussion explores the concept of systems thinking in beef cattle production and how it expands beyond traditional population medicine approaches. Systems thinking focuses on understanding how multiple interconnected factors—such as nutrition, environment, disease exposure, and management practices—interact over time to influence herd health and productivity. Many cattle health and performance issues develop gradually, often involving delayed cause-and-effect relationships that can span months or even generations. The approach also recognizes that cattle may pass through multiple owners or environments, meaning problems observed in one setting may have originated earlier in the system. Rather than targeting a single cause, systems thinking addresses multifactorial “syndromes” where several influences combine to create outcomes like disease or poor reproduction. Key elements include ensuring proper nutrition, maintaining good environmental conditions, and aligning management decisions—such as breeding timing—with forage availability. The concept emphasizes that yearly outcomes are interconnected, with current management decisions affecting future herd performance. In stocker operations, additional complexity arises from combining cattle from different sources and managing land across multiple production cycles. Practically, systems thinking encourages producers to identify “pinch points” such as water access, cattle arrival stress, and housing conditions. Ultimately, it provides a framework for long-term problem solving, focusing on improving the entire production system rather than reacting only to visible health events.

See All (99)

Ratings & Reviews

5
out of 5
26 Ratings

About

Listen to veterinary professionals from the Beef Cattle Institute at Kansas State University talk about a variety of topics within cattle health, nutrition, reproduction, and science. New episodes of Bovine Science with BCI are posted each Monday.

Information

You Might Also Like