ACB Business

Rick Morin

ACB Board meetings and other ACB Business and Committee meetings open to the public.

  1. 3d ago

    Ensuring Equitable Access and Prohibiting Surcharges for Required Support Personnel, Interpreters, and Co-Navigators at Convention Meals

    Motion by Dee Ann Hart of Indiana: Move to adopt the following resolution: Ensuring Equitable Access and Prohibiting Surcharges for Required Support Personnel, Interpreters, and Co-Navigators at Convention Meals Whereas, the American Council of the Blind (ACB) is dedicated to securing full integration and equal participation of people who are blind or visually impaired, including those with dual sensory disabilities, in all aspects of society, including professional development, advocacy, and social networking conferences; and Whereas, conferences, conventions, and seminars frequently feature essential educational programming, keynote addresses, and high-level networking opportunities that take place concurrently with ticketed or provided meals; and Whereas, individuals with dual sensory disabilities or specific physical access needs often rely on a variety of distinct, highly specialized support roles to achieve equal access, including: 1. Support Service Providers (SSPs) / Co-Navigators, who provide critical environmental information, visual description, and sighted guide mobility to facilitate independent choice and situational awareness; 2. Tactile Interpreters, who translate spoken language into standard sign language received through the attendee's hands; and 3. ProTactile Interpreters, who utilize a holistic, touch-based communication system that conveys not only linguistic content but also real-time backchannel feedback, environmental context, and social cues via touch; and Whereas, as an organization representing the disability community, we recognize that we do not ask our members with other disabilities to leave their guide dogs, canes, wheelchairs, walkers, or assistive technology at the door, and it is a fundamental contradiction to expect individuals with dual sensory impairments to attend functions stripped of their vital support systems; and Whereas, this resolution is not requesting or mandating that the host convention or organization employ, recruit, or provide personal attendant care or support service professionals for registered attendees; rather, it identifies that when a person with a dual sensory disability arrives with an SSP, tactile interpreter, or ProTactile interpreter, the professional and the consumer function together as an inseparable team—just as a wheelchair user is one with their chair, or a guide dog and handler are a unified team; and Whereas, individuals with dual sensory disabilities are capable self-advocates who may function entirely independently in various settings and environments throughout the convention week, meaning this resolution in no way mandates the SSP/interpreter and the participant to be connected "hip-to-hip" through the entire convention, but instead enforces accommodation laws on the host organization to respect the targeted accommodation needs of their dually sensory disabled members; and Whereas, during meal-centered sessions, these professionals are actively on duty—describing table layouts, assisting with mechanical navigation of food and utensils, conveying ambient group conversations, or continuously translating presentations—requiring them to remain present at the table; and Whereas, required support personnel, tactile interpreters, and ProTactile interpreters cannot effectively perform their duties if they are forced to leave the premises to secure food, or if they are excluded from receiving a meal while the attendee and other table participants eat, creating an undignified, exclusionary, and impractical environment; and Whereas, a vital distinction must be maintained between a support person acting solely in a professional accommodation capacity and an individual participating in the convention for personal or professional development; namely, that if a support person—whether an ACB member or non-member—is present strictly to fulfill the role of an SSP or interpreter, their presence is an accommodation, but if they choose to attend and participate in convention activities independently outside of their support duties, they operate as an individual participant; and Whereas, Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) explicitly prohibits public accommodations and non-profit entities from imposing a surcharge on individuals with disabilities to cover the costs of accommodations, auxiliary aids, or services required to achieve equal access; and Whereas, requiring an attendee with a disability to purchase an additional meal ticket or pay a higher registration tier for an essential support provider or interpreter constitutes an inequitable financial penalty and an implicit surcharge for an accommodation; now, therefore, be it Resolved, by the American Council of the Blind in Convention assembled in the city of [City], [State], on this [Day] day of July, 2027, that ACB strongly affirms that when a conference or convention attendee requires the presence of an SSP, co-navigator, tactile interpreter, or ProTactile interpreter to fully participate in a meal-centered session, the cost of providing a meal to that support professional is an inherent part of the accommodation; and be it further Resolved, that ACB explicitly opposes any policy, whether by external hospitality vendors or host organizations, that treats a support provider and consumer as separate registration entities for meal sessions, and firmly states that the consumer and their support system must be considered one unified person for the purpose of event entry and meal provision; and be it further Resolved, that ACB establishes that when a support person attends a convention or event independently to participate in activities separate from their duties to the individual with a dual sensory disability, that support person must be a dues-paying member (if applicable to the registration type) and must pay their own registration fees, meal tickets, and event costs standard to any individual participant; and be it further Resolved, that ACB urges all national, state, and local affiliates, as well as external convention organizers, to proactively incorporate the anticipated costs of support personnel, tactile interpreters, and ProTactile interpreters' meals into general event overhead budgets, registration design, and hotel negotiation frameworks; and be it further Resolved, that ACB direct its leadership to create and publish a standard "Accessible Event Budgeting Guideline" to assist affiliates and external partners in implementing inclusive registration models that protect attendees from discriminatory financial barriers. Find out more at https://acb-business.pinecast.co

  2. Jul 7

    2026 ACB Convention Standing Rules

    Convention Standing Rules Adopted by the ACB Board of Directors, May 19, 2025 Preamble The ACB Standing Rules are updated annually to ensure fairness and efficiency during debates and voting. Election materials, proposed Resolutions, and Amendments to the ACB Constitution and Bylaws are published in advance. Zoom sessions are scheduled for discussion and questions. Members are encouraged to attend or listen to these sessions to be informed and suggest amendments. 1. A. At the outset of debate on any issue before the convention, there shall be a period not to exceed ten (10) minutes devoted exclusively to questions and other points of clarification about the issue being debated. Speakers shall be limited to one minute, with no more than five speakers recognized, and a speaker shall be limited to asking about their point of clarification and shall not discuss the merits of the issue. B. Debate on the merits of the issue shall begin at the conclusion of the ten-minute period for points of clarification. When the initial debate period begins, in the case of a resolution, the maker of that resolution shall be given an opportunity to address the assembly on the merits of the resolution. C. Each debatable issue before the convention shall be limited to approximately twenty (20) minutes with a two-minute time limit per speaker, alternating between supporting speakers, including the maker of the resolution if they speak pursuant to subsection (b), and opposing speakers, unless a majority of the members agree to extend debate for an additional period of time. A member who does not seek recognition for purposes of debate at the beginning of a debate period shall not be eligible for debate during that debate period. The chair shall, during any debate period, immediately close debate when an equal number of speakers have debated each side and no additional speakers have sought the floor. D. Speakers shall not be recognized for purposes of seeking points of clarification during a debate period. Each member is respectfully urged to speak directly to the issue before the assembly and avoid unnecessary and time-consuming dialogue. No member will be recognized a second time to debate until all who wish to debate have been recognized. E. Motions to close debate will not be recognized by the chair during the first debate period. After the first debate period, properly moved motions such as “I call for the question” or “I move the previous question” will be handled by the chair and voted on by the assembly. F. At the beginning of the first 20-minute debate period, the chair shall define for the body what constitutes a point of order (or other parliamentary inquiry) and shall signify how a member can be recognized for the purpose of making a point of order (or other parliamentary inquiry). Any time in which a point of order is being considered shall not be deducted from the debate period. G. With respect to any motion on the floor, other than a motion on the adoption of a constitutional or bylaw amendment, if no one seeks the floor to debate in opposition to the motion, the chair may ask whether there is any objection to declaring a unanimous vote in favor of the motion. If, using the appropriate method for a rising vote, no one objects to such a unanimous vote in favor of the motion, the chair shall declare the motion passed unanimously. If an objection is made to a unanimous vote, the chair shall proceed to a rising vote on the motion. 2. A. Except as provided in subsection (b), an amendment to a resolution or constitution or bylaw amendment may not be offered on the floor unless; 1. In the case of a resolution, the language for the proposed amendment has been provided to the chair of the Resolutions Committee prior to the opening of the session in which that resolution is scheduled to be debated, and 2. In the case of an amendment to a constitution or bylaw amendment, the language for the proposed amendment has been provided to the chair of the Constitution and Bylaws Committee prior to the opening of the session in which that constitution or bylaw amendment is scheduled to be debated. B. Notwithstanding subsection (A), if, in the opinion of the convention chair, the amendment being proposed is non-substantive or clarifying in nature, the amendment may be proposed and adopted by unanimous consent. C. Voting on an amendment to a proposed Resolution or Constitution or Bylaw Amendment shall occur by rising vote only. It shall not, therefore, be in order to seek a record vote on such an amendment. 3. The parliamentarian will act as timekeeper. 4. Recognition to speak will be given to those members who properly address the chair either using the “raise hand” feature of the Zoom internet meeting client program or while standing at a microphone in the convention hall and giving their names and affiliation. 5. Nominating and seconding speeches shall be limited to five minutes per candidate with the speaking time allocated according to the candidate's wishes. A person nominated for an office more than once shall be limited to one minute. 6. When no candidate for office receives a majority vote, the election shall be between the top two candidates. Affiliate votes will be reported in whole or half numbers. In all uncontested elections as verified after three calls for additional nominations, the chair may declare the candidate elected by acclamation. “Write in” candidacies are not permitted. 7. A. Once a rising vote has been taken on a resolution, the chair will announce the result. If the difference between the winning and losing side of a rising vote is less than 20%, a record vote can be requested if 25% or more of those voting on the losing side request it. Alternatively, the presiding officer may call for a record vote if they believe there is enough uncertainty in the margin. B. After debate has ceased on a resolution and it is subsequently determined that a record vote is required, no further amendments may be proposed. Find out more at https://acb-business.pinecast.co

About

ACB Board meetings and other ACB Business and Committee meetings open to the public.