The Moscow Murders and More

Bobby Capucci

Moscow is a city located in northern Idaho, United States, with a population of approximately 25,000 people. It is the largest city and the county seat of Latah County. The city is situated in the Palouse region, known for its fertile soil and rolling hills, and is surrounded by wheat fields, forests, and mountains.Moscow is home to the University of Idaho, which is the state's flagship institution and a major research university. The university is a significant contributor to the local economy, and many businesses in the city are directly or indirectly tied to the university. The city also has a thriving arts and culture scene, with several galleries, museums, and performance venues.In terms of recreation, Moscow has several parks and outdoor recreation areas, including the Latah Trail, the Moscow Mountain Trail System, and the Palouse Divide Nordic Ski Area. The city also hosts several annual events, including the Moscow Farmers Market, the Lionel Hampton Jazz Festival, and the Renaissance Fair. However, things would change forever after Xana Kernodle, Ethan Chapin, Madison Mogen and Kaylee Goncalves were murdered in the early morning hours of November 13th, 2022. What followed in the wake of the murders captivated not only the nation but the whole world as the authorities scrambled to find the person responsible for the heinous crime. This podcast will document the Murders In Moscow from right after the murders were committed all the way through the real time evolution of the trial of the person that the authorities say is responsible, Bryan Kohberger. We will also cover other stories that are based in the world of true crime that are currently in the courts or that are headed that way. Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

  1. 1h ago

    Mega Edition: Donald Trump, Jeffrey Epstein And Jane Doe # 4 (11/13/26)

    Republican Congressman Thomas Massie of Kentucky has emerged as one of the most determined advocates for transparency in the Jeffrey Epstein case, repeatedly confronting President Donald Trump, House Republican leadership, and the Justice Department over their handling of the Epstein files. Massie's battle intensified in July 2025 when he joined Democratic Congressman Ro Khanna to introduce the Epstein Files Transparency Act, legislation designed to compel the Justice Department to release its investigative records concerning Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Facing opposition from Trump and House Speaker Mike Johnson, Massie pursued a discharge petition to bypass Republican leadership and force a vote, eventually securing the necessary 218 signatures with support from Democrats and a small group of Republicans willing to defy the president. Throughout the fight, Trump publicly attacked Massie and other Republicans demanding disclosure, turning the controversy into a bitter confrontation within his own party. Massie refused to retreat, arguing that the American people and Epstein's survivors deserved access to the records regardless of whose reputations might be damaged. His persistence ultimately paid off in November 2025 when the House overwhelmingly approved the legislation by a vote of 427 to 1, forcing Trump to reverse his opposition and sign the bill into law. However, what appeared to be a landmark victory quickly became another battle when the Justice Department missed its December disclosure deadline and subsequently released millions of pages containing extensive redactions and omissions. Massie accused the administration of disregarding the law's requirements and argued that passing transparency legislation meant little if the officials responsible for enforcing it could simply refuse to comply. Rather than declaring victory and moving on, Massie continued pressing the administration throughout 2026, accusing the Justice Department of unlawfully withholding millions of Epstein-related records while failing to provide satisfactory explanations for its redactions. Alongside Khanna, he sought judicial scrutiny of the department's compliance and introduced the Epstein Files Transparency Act II in July 2026, legislation intended to give survivors, members of Congress, and state attorneys general the ability to sue the federal government to compel disclosure. The proposal also sought to provide survivors with access to unredacted records concerning their own abuse and make investigative materials available to state and local prosecutors pursuing Epstein-related cases. Massie subsequently launched another discharge petition, once again challenging Republican leadership and attempting to force a vote despite resistance from members of his own party. His campaign gained additional attention as lawmakers questioned whether the Justice Department was using legal privileges and excessive redactions to conceal material that Congress had already ordered released. With the 2026 midterm elections producing a Democratic congressional majority, Massie's efforts gained renewed momentum, although his impending departure from Congress in January 2027 created additional urgency for the legislation. His fight has distinguished him from Republicans who publicly championed Epstein transparency while resisting measures that would compel the administration to deliver it. By repeatedly challenging Trump, confronting congressional leadership, and seeking enforceable legal consequences for noncompliance, Massie has made the Epstein files a defining issue of his final years in Congress, demonstrating a willingness to break with his own party over a scandal that continues to raise serious questions about government secrecy and accountability. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

  2. 3h ago

    Mega Edition: Transcripts From The Alex Acosta Deposition (Part 16-20) (11/13/26)

    When Alex Acosta sat before Congress to explain himself, what unfolded was less an act of accountability and more a masterclass in bureaucratic self-preservation. He painted the 2008 Epstein plea deal as a “strategic compromise,” claiming a federal trial might have been too risky because victims were “unreliable” and evidence was “thin.” In reality, federal prosecutors had a mountain of corroborating witness statements, corroborative travel logs, and sworn victim testimony—yet Acosta gave Epstein the deal of the century. The so-called non-prosecution agreement wasn’t justice; it was a backroom surrender, executed in secrecy, without even notifying the victims. When pressed on this, Acosta spun excuses about legal precedent and “jurisdictional confusion,” never once admitting the obvious: his office protected a rich, politically connected predator at the expense of dozens of trafficked girls. Even more damning was Acosta’s insistence that he acted out of pragmatism, not pressure. He denied that anyone “higher up” told him to back off—even though he once told reporters that he’d been informed Epstein “belonged to intelligence.” Under oath, he downplayed that statement, twisting it into bureaucratic double-speak. He even claimed the deal achieved “some level of justice” because Epstein registered as a sex offender—a hollow justification that only exposed how insulated from reality he remains. Acosta never showed remorse for the irreparable damage caused by his cowardice. His congressional testimony reeked of moral rot, the same rot that let a billionaire pedophile walk free while survivors were left to pick up the pieces. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Acosta Transcript.pdf - Google Drive Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

  3. 5h ago

    Mega Edition: Transcripts From The Alex Acosta Deposition (Part 13-15) (11/12/26)

    When Alex Acosta sat before Congress to explain himself, what unfolded was less an act of accountability and more a masterclass in bureaucratic self-preservation. He painted the 2008 Epstein plea deal as a “strategic compromise,” claiming a federal trial might have been too risky because victims were “unreliable” and evidence was “thin.” In reality, federal prosecutors had a mountain of corroborating witness statements, corroborative travel logs, and sworn victim testimony—yet Acosta gave Epstein the deal of the century. The so-called non-prosecution agreement wasn’t justice; it was a backroom surrender, executed in secrecy, without even notifying the victims. When pressed on this, Acosta spun excuses about legal precedent and “jurisdictional confusion,” never once admitting the obvious: his office protected a rich, politically connected predator at the expense of dozens of trafficked girls. Even more damning was Acosta’s insistence that he acted out of pragmatism, not pressure. He denied that anyone “higher up” told him to back off—even though he once told reporters that he’d been informed Epstein “belonged to intelligence.” Under oath, he downplayed that statement, twisting it into bureaucratic double-speak. He even claimed the deal achieved “some level of justice” because Epstein registered as a sex offender—a hollow justification that only exposed how insulated from reality he remains. Acosta never showed remorse for the irreparable damage caused by his cowardice. His congressional testimony reeked of moral rot, the same rot that let a billionaire pedophile walk free while survivors were left to pick up the pieces. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Acosta Transcript.pdf - Google Drive Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

  4. 7h ago

    The Search For The Little Rock Slasher

    The Little Rock Slasher, also known as the River City Ripper, was an unidentified suspected serial killer linked to a series of brutal knife attacks in Little Rock, Arkansas, between August 2020 and April 2021. The attacks left three people dead and one woman seriously wounded, with investigators believing the victims were targeted while walking alone during the early morning hours. The first known victim, 64-year-old Larry McChristian, was stabbed to death on August 24, 2020, followed by the killing of Jeff Welch on September 23. After several months without a reported attack, the violence resumed on April 11, 2021, when 43-year-old Debra Walker survived a vicious stabbing that left her with more than a dozen wounds. The following morning, 40-year-old Marlon Franklin was found fatally stabbed near an overpass. Investigators connected the four attacks through similarities in the method of assault, the timing of the incidents, and their geographical proximity. The apparent randomness of the violence suggested that the attacker was targeting vulnerable pedestrians rather than individuals with whom he had a personal connection. In April 2021, the Little Rock Police Department publicly announced that investigators believed the four attacks were connected and warned residents about a suspected serial killer operating in the city. Police obtained surveillance footage showing a possible suspect and enlisted assistance from the FBI's Behavioral Analysis Unit to develop an investigative profile. Walker, the sole known survivor, described her attacker as a tall, slender Black man, while investigators emphasized that the assaults appeared unprovoked and involved victims who had no known connection to one another. Authorities offered a reward of up to $20,000 for information leading to an arrest and conviction, but the investigation produced no publicly confirmed identification of the killer. The attacks stopped as suddenly as they had begun, leaving investigators uncertain whether the perpetrator had moved away, died, been incarcerated for another offense, or simply stopped killing. Despite the surveillance evidence, survivor testimony, and extensive publicity, no arrest or conviction had been publicly confirmed as of November 2026, leaving the Little Rock Slasher case among Arkansas's most disturbing unresolved serial murder investigations. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

  5. 9h ago

    The Sinaloa Cartel's Fractured Empire: El Marino and the Rise of Los Exiliados

    Carlos Enrique Martínez Cuesta, a former Mexican marine known as “El Marino” or “El 5,” allegedly established his own drug trafficking organization after breaking away from the powerful Sinaloa Cartel, according to confidential Mexican military documents exposed in an October 2022 leak. Martínez had previously served as a driver for the commander of Mexico's Sixth Naval Region in Colima before deserting the military and becoming a trusted lieutenant of Ismael “El Mayo” Zambada, one of the Sinaloa Cartel's founding leaders. However, growing tensions between Zambada's faction and the sons of Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán, collectively known as Los Chapitos, reportedly convinced Martínez to establish an independent criminal organization called Los Exiliados, or “The Exiled.” The group allegedly operated around Manzanillo, Colima, a strategically important Pacific port that served as a major entry point for chemical precursors imported from China and used in the production of methamphetamine and fentanyl. Mexican authorities identified Martínez as a high-priority criminal target, raising concerns that another armed trafficking organization could emerge from the continuing fragmentation of the Sinaloa Cartel The allegations emerged from a massive cyberattack against Mexico's Defense Ministry carried out by the hacker collective Guacamaya, which obtained more than four million confidential documents containing sensitive intelligence about organized crime, military operations, and government activities. Among the stolen records was an August 2022 military intelligence report identifying six priority criminal targets, including Martínez, Juan Carlos Valencia, and Julio Alberto Castillo Rodríguez, the latter two having family connections to Jalisco New Generation Cartel leader Nemesio Oseguera Cervantes, known as “El Mencho.” The leaked documents also exposed allegations of corruption within Mexico's armed forces, including a 2019 incident in which a military member reportedly offered to sell 70 hand grenades to a criminal organization for approximately $1,300 each, with eight allegedly purchased and delivered. The revelations highlighted the increasingly complicated relationship between Mexico's military institutions and organized crime, particularly as former service members used their training and connections to establish criminal enterprises. Martínez's reported activities also drew comparisons to Los Zetas, the notoriously violent cartel originally formed by former Mexican special forces personnel. The allegations surrounding Los Exiliados illustrated how internal cartel rivalries, military defections, and corruption contributed to the emergence of new trafficking organizations competing for control of Mexico's lucrative narcotics trade. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

  6. 11h ago

    The Maxwell Trial Transcripts: Kate Describes Her Relationship With Ghislaine Maxwell (Part 8) (11/12/26)

    During the 2021 federal sex trafficking trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, a British woman testifying under the pseudonym "Kate" described how Maxwell allegedly groomed her for sexual encounters with Jeffrey Epstein after they met in Paris in 1994, when Kate was 17 years old. Kate testified that she admired Maxwell's wealth, sophistication, and social standing and initially believed their relationship would develop into a meaningful friendship. Maxwell subsequently invited her to a London residence, introduced her to Epstein, and encouraged her to massage his feet. According to Kate, Maxwell later contacted her claiming that Epstein needed a massage because his regular massage therapist was unavailable. Despite having no professional massage experience, Kate agreed, and Maxwell escorted her into a bedroom, provided massage oil, and closed the door behind her. Kate testified that Epstein initiated sexual contact during the encounter and that Maxwell subsequently praised her, telling her she was a good girl and one of Epstein's favorites. She also described subsequent encounters at Epstein's properties in New York, Palm Beach, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, including an incident in Florida when Maxwell instructed her to wear a schoolgirl outfit while serving Epstein tea. Kate further testified that Maxwell discussed Epstein's frequent sexual demands and asked whether she knew other young, attractive girls who might be willing to perform sexual acts for him. Kate's testimony provided prosecutors with evidence of Maxwell's alleged methods of cultivating relationships with vulnerable young women, gaining their trust, and gradually introducing them to sexual activity with Epstein. She explained that her admiration for Maxwell and desire for acceptance made it difficult to recognize the exploitation she was experiencing, while her fear of Epstein and Maxwell's powerful connections contributed to her continued association with them. Kate acknowledged maintaining contact with Epstein for years afterward, explaining that distancing herself would have forced her to confront what had happened. During cross-examination, Maxwell's defense attorneys attempted to undermine her credibility by questioning her history of substance abuse, continued communications with Epstein, and a $3.25 million settlement she received through an Epstein victims' compensation arrangement. Kate rejected suggestions that her substance use had distorted her recollection of the significant events she described. Because she was above the applicable age of consent during the alleged encounters, Judge Alison Nathan instructed jurors that Kate was not a victim of the offenses charged against Maxwell and that her testimony could not independently establish Maxwell's guilt. Nevertheless, prosecutors presented her account as evidence of the broader pattern of recruitment and grooming they alleged Maxwell employed to facilitate Epstein's sexual exploitation of young women and underage girls. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: Ghislaine Maxwell Trial Transcript, 12.6.21 Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

  7. 13h ago

    The GOP House Oversight Report on Jeffrey Epstein and the Failure of Federal Authorities (Part 3) (11/12/26)

    A 137-page report released on November 10, 2026, by the Republican-led House Oversight Committee under Chairman James Comer detailed decades of government misconduct concerns, institutional negligence, and preferential treatment that allowed Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell to continue sexually exploiting young women and girls. The investigation sharply criticized former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta's handling of Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement, identified potential conflicts of interest involving former federal prosecutors Matthew Menchel and Bruce Reinhart, and condemned the extraordinary work-release privileges that allowed Epstein to continue abusing victims while serving his Florida jail sentence. The report also questioned the credibility of former Epstein employees Lesley Groff, Richard Kahn, and Darren Indyke, accusing them of ignoring obvious warning signs while helping maintain the infrastructure surrounding his operation. Investigators examined Epstein's relationships with Leslie Wexner, Leon Black, Jes Staley, and other influential associates, concluding that his wealth, political connections, financial institutions, and loyal employees helped shield him from accountability. The committee also highlighted the role of modeling agencies, financial arrangements, and international recruitment networks in sustaining Epstein's trafficking enterprise. The Republican report also examined Epstein's August 2019 death at the Metropolitan Correctional Center, documenting serious security failures, missed prisoner checks, malfunctioning surveillance cameras, and unanswered questions surrounding an unidentified orange figure captured on video near his housing area. Although investigators did not overturn the official suicide finding, they acknowledged that certain questions remained unresolved. The committee criticized the Justice Department's failure to meet Epstein Files Transparency Act requirements and its mishandling of survivor information through inadequate redactions, while simultaneously praising the Trump administration's transparency efforts and accusing congressional Democrats of prioritizing investigations into Trump over broader accountability. Its recommendations included renewed scrutiny of potential facilitators, stronger survivor protections, restrictions on abusive nondisclosure agreements, improved financial oversight, and reforms to federal investigative procedures. Despite documenting extensive institutional failures and acknowledging that numerous potentially important witnesses had yet to be interviewed, the Republican majority's report stopped short of establishing a comprehensive accounting of everyone who helped sustain Epstein's operation, leaving fundamental questions about criminal responsibility, government protection, and meaningful accountability unanswered. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: A-Review-of-the-Federal-Governments-Mishandling-of-the-Jeffrey-Epstein-and-Ghislaine-Maxwell-Criminal-Investigations_OGR-Maj-Report.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

  8. 15h ago

    The GOP House Oversight Report on Jeffrey Epstein and the Failure of Federal Authorities (Part 2) (11/12/26)

    A 137-page report released on November 10, 2026, by the Republican-led House Oversight Committee under Chairman James Comer detailed decades of government misconduct concerns, institutional negligence, and preferential treatment that allowed Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell to continue sexually exploiting young women and girls. The investigation sharply criticized former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta's handling of Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement, identified potential conflicts of interest involving former federal prosecutors Matthew Menchel and Bruce Reinhart, and condemned the extraordinary work-release privileges that allowed Epstein to continue abusing victims while serving his Florida jail sentence. The report also questioned the credibility of former Epstein employees Lesley Groff, Richard Kahn, and Darren Indyke, accusing them of ignoring obvious warning signs while helping maintain the infrastructure surrounding his operation. Investigators examined Epstein's relationships with Leslie Wexner, Leon Black, Jes Staley, and other influential associates, concluding that his wealth, political connections, financial institutions, and loyal employees helped shield him from accountability. The committee also highlighted the role of modeling agencies, financial arrangements, and international recruitment networks in sustaining Epstein's trafficking enterprise. The Republican report also examined Epstein's August 2019 death at the Metropolitan Correctional Center, documenting serious security failures, missed prisoner checks, malfunctioning surveillance cameras, and unanswered questions surrounding an unidentified orange figure captured on video near his housing area. Although investigators did not overturn the official suicide finding, they acknowledged that certain questions remained unresolved. The committee criticized the Justice Department's failure to meet Epstein Files Transparency Act requirements and its mishandling of survivor information through inadequate redactions, while simultaneously praising the Trump administration's transparency efforts and accusing congressional Democrats of prioritizing investigations into Trump over broader accountability. Its recommendations included renewed scrutiny of potential facilitators, stronger survivor protections, restrictions on abusive nondisclosure agreements, improved financial oversight, and reforms to federal investigative procedures. Despite documenting extensive institutional failures and acknowledging that numerous potentially important witnesses had yet to be interviewed, the Republican majority's report stopped short of establishing a comprehensive accounting of everyone who helped sustain Epstein's operation, leaving fundamental questions about criminal responsibility, government protection, and meaningful accountability unanswered. to contact me: bobbycapucci@protonmail.com source: A-Review-of-the-Federal-Governments-Mishandling-of-the-Jeffrey-Epstein-and-Ghislaine-Maxwell-Criminal-Investigations_OGR-Maj-Report.pdf Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

3.2
out of 5
47 Ratings

About

Moscow is a city located in northern Idaho, United States, with a population of approximately 25,000 people. It is the largest city and the county seat of Latah County. The city is situated in the Palouse region, known for its fertile soil and rolling hills, and is surrounded by wheat fields, forests, and mountains.Moscow is home to the University of Idaho, which is the state's flagship institution and a major research university. The university is a significant contributor to the local economy, and many businesses in the city are directly or indirectly tied to the university. The city also has a thriving arts and culture scene, with several galleries, museums, and performance venues.In terms of recreation, Moscow has several parks and outdoor recreation areas, including the Latah Trail, the Moscow Mountain Trail System, and the Palouse Divide Nordic Ski Area. The city also hosts several annual events, including the Moscow Farmers Market, the Lionel Hampton Jazz Festival, and the Renaissance Fair. However, things would change forever after Xana Kernodle, Ethan Chapin, Madison Mogen and Kaylee Goncalves were murdered in the early morning hours of November 13th, 2022. What followed in the wake of the murders captivated not only the nation but the whole world as the authorities scrambled to find the person responsible for the heinous crime. This podcast will document the Murders In Moscow from right after the murders were committed all the way through the real time evolution of the trial of the person that the authorities say is responsible, Bryan Kohberger. We will also cover other stories that are based in the world of true crime that are currently in the courts or that are headed that way. Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

You Might Also Like