Freedom Unaffiliated

Independence Institute

Did you know 46% of the voters in Colorado are unaffiliated? Have you ever wondered why? Hear from the experts at Independence Institute talk about the issues important to Colorado and how to bring some sanity to this increasingly leftist state.

  1. 6D AGO

    Colorado’s one-party rulers steadily chip away at democracy

    Another week, another column about Colorado’s ruling class treating democracy like a state trooper treats the speed limit. It’s for other people. I swear, I want to write about literally anything else — aliens, sports, lab-grown meat, Bigfoot opening a vape shop in Pueblo. But Colorado’s legislature has never been more abusive to the citizenry, or hypocritical. The kings of ColoradoTo save time, I won’t rehash the endless “No Kings,” “Trump is destroying democracy,” “our sacred duty is protecting democracy, so be happy you have us” self-promotion constantly ejaculated by Colorado’s ruling class. But, for the sake of argument, let’s pretend every word of it is true. Let’s assume President Donald Trump wakes every morning and convenes a joint special-forces meeting to steal democracy in Colorado. If democracy is truly hanging by a thread, then surely Colorado’s Democrat majority is heroically defending it. I mean, they say that’s their job one, next to banning ketchup packets (Senate Bill 146, seriously). Which leaves me confused. Because from my tiny little “just-a-citizen” brain perspective, they seem to spend an awful lot of time removing voters’ power, hiding meetings, dodging taxpayer consent and nullifying ballot initiatives. Maybe I’m missing the advanced theory of democracy taught only in elite government seminars and overpriced Aspen retreats. Take Senate Bill 150. It strips away two-thirds of RTD’s publicly elected board seats and replaces them with appointees. Silly me. I thought democracy involved electing people. But apparently true democracy is when insiders choose insiders to protect the public from the dangerous unpredictability of… the public. Then there’s House Bill 1326, which exempts the all-powerful Public Utilities Commission from open meetings laws. Again, I’m sure there’s a sophisticated democracy-enhancing explanation for this. Perhaps democracy works best when the public cannot actually watch government decisions being made. Sort of a “trust us you peasants” model of self-government. House Bill 1418 puts a “fee” on games young people play online. Now, if it walks like a tax, quacks like a tax and drains your wallet like a tax, a normal person might call it a tax. But by labeling it a “fee,” lawmakers can dodge asking voters for permission. Which is convenient. Because asking permission from citizens can really slow down democracy. Even more amazing, this fee appears large enough that under existing law it should require voter approval anyway. Yet lawmakers are still trying to skip the vote. Apparently democracy is strongest when elections are treated as optional. Truth is optionalThen there’s Senate Bill 135, which takes your TABOR refunds. At least this one goes to the ballot. But the ballot language will say the money goes to education. In reality, only a small fraction actually does. Maybe I’m old fashioned, but using misleading ballot language to convince voters to surrender their money feels less like defending democracy and more like a used car salesman turning back the odometer on a lemon. Now comes the cherry on top, House Bill 1430, filed in the final chaotic moments of the session. Its purpose is beautifully simple: invalidate a citizen initiative that might appear on the ballot this fall. Kill what voters might vote for before they vote on it. I always believed democracy meant if voters approve something at the ballot box, government respects the outcome. Isn’t that what the anger against Trump and Tina Peters is all about? Here’s the backstory: Colorado used to dedicate sales tax revenue from automobile parts and accessories to roads. Which honestly seems reasonable, given roads are where cars generally go (Man, if I could still get away with a drunk driving joke, this would be a perfect spot). But the legislature ended that sensible funding stream. We don’t really do road funding anymore. I don’t need to convince you of that. Instead, we currently do incentives for front-end alignment shops. Now there’s a potential citizen initiative that might restore that road-funding mechanism. Maybe it makes the ballot. Maybe voters approve it. Maybe they don’t. That’s how democracy is supposed to work. But HB-1430 essentially says, “That’s cute. Your vote still won’t matter.” If voters approve returning the road funding, with 1430 lawmakers will reduce road funding by the exact same amount. Thankfully, Colorado is governed by people who understand democracy far better than voters do. Thank God Colorado’s one-party rulers are here to save democracy from the voters. Jon Caldara is president of Independence Institute, a free market think tank in Denver.

    6 min
  2. MAY 11

    The True Danger to Democracy isn't Trump, its Democrats

    Alexander Fraser Tytler was a judge, historian and professor of history in Scotland, born in 1747, who observed that, “A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury, with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by dictatorship.” Tytler further observed, “The average of the world’s greatest civilizations has been 200 hundred years. These nations have progressed through this sequence: From bondage to spiritual faith; from spiritual faith to great courage; from courage to liberty; from liberty to abundance; from abundance to complacency; from complacency to apathy; from apathy to dependence; from dependence back again to bondage.” Voting in largesseIn this, America’s 250th year, we’ve beaten the average, but this sequence has a spooky resemblance to our trajectory and offers a dire warning. Our founders had the wisdom and foresight to craft a constitution designed to protect individual liberty and limit government. Government is necessary, but government isn’t society. It’s a subset of society and subservient to the people, it’s not their master or their mother. The American Dream isn’t winning the Powerball lottery. That’s just a lucky windfall. It’s about the opportunity individuals have in this country to achieve success and even greatness through ingenuity, hard work, and personal responsibility. As government at all levels has expanded, the American dream has decayed into the American entitlement, with government assuming the role of supreme benefactor — “sharing the wealth,” as President Obama put it — with punitive income taxes on productive taxpayers redistributed to net tax receivers. When the number of net tax receivers exceeds that of taxpayers, we’re on the road to Tytler’s prophesy. Government policies should encourage the expansion of societal wealth, not discourage it in the name of compassion and “social justice” that rewards dependency and punishes effort and achievement. Total government spending at all levels in our welfare state is now 46% of GDP, the measure of our economy. Government compassion and charity are fine up to a point. It becomes counterproductive if there’s no limiting principle. The needs of net tax receivers are inevitably surpassed by their wants. What the federal government calls “payments for individuals” — Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and a cornucopia of so-called welfare “entitlement” programs — now consumes more than 70% of all federal spending compared to 26% in 1960, leading to endless budget deficits and the current national debt of $39 trillion. The top one percent of taxpayers already pays 40% of total federal individual income taxes while the bottom 50% pays just 3%, which is greatly exceeded by the cost of government handouts they receive. Soaking the rich can’t balance the budget, even drowning them won’t do it. Yes, Americans have earned their Social Security benefits, but the system is on the brink of insolvency. It’s been an intergenerational transfer of income with taxes paid by current workers shifted to current recipients. But benefits have been expanded and increasing life expectancy and lower birth rates have dropped the ratio of workers per beneficiary from 16:1 in 1950 to barely 2:1 today. Democrats threaten democracyRepublicans in Congress are concerned about all this, but the public isn’t. Attempts to reform these programs are politically hazardous. Former Speaker of the House Paul Ryan’s (R-Wisconsin) courageous but futile efforts at entitlement reform prematurely ended his political career in 2019, at the age of 48. Democrats aren’t concerned and have no limiting principle on government spending and taxation on the way to creating their socialist paradise. During the Covid pandemic the feds ran massive budget deficits to flood state governments with money. This is standard Keynesian economics to head off a recession by creating artificial monetary demand unattached to productivity that invariably leads to a future inflationary spike, as we saw. In Colorado, especially Denver, where progressive Democrats have total government control, they became addicted to that temporary binge and made it their new permanent spending level causing huge budget deficits they intend to fill by gutting TABOR and raising taxes. Of course, “soaking the rich” is a key ingredient. Common sense and economic reality dictate an obvious alternative remedy. Duh: prioritize spending and cut it back to a manageable level. Instead, Colorado Democrats are foolishly repeating the mistakes of California, New York, and Illinois, which have driven businesses and upper-income taxpayers to red states like Florida and Texas. Destructive progressive ideology reinforces Professor Tytler’s explanation of the death of democracies. Ironically, the true danger to democracy isn’t Donald Trump, it’s Democrats. Longtime KOA radio talk host and columnist for the Denver Post and Rocky Mountain News Mike Rosen now writes for Complete Colorado.

    7 min
  3. MAY 7

    Flipping the script: Coloradans no longer run their government

    We the people of Colorado no longer control our own state constitution. I found this out the hard way. In Colorado, a government for, by, and of the people is a fib. We lowly citizens no longer have much of a say in altering our own state constitution. Even though that seems to violate the whole meaning of our constitution in the first place. We the peopleLike the US Constitution, Colorado’s constitution contains a Bill of Rights making clear we are the ones who empower the state government, not the other way around. Check out the first two of these rights: First — All political power is vested in and derived from the people; all government, of right, originates from the people… Second — The people of this state have the sole and exclusive right of governing themselves, as a free, sovereign and independent state; and to alter and abolish their constitution… Did you catch that? We the people have the sole and exclusive right to alter our constitution. It used to be true, too. We used to alter our constitution through the initiative and referendum process. Without that process, we would not have limits on governmental power. Laws reining in the legislature could never pass a vote by those same politicians. They’d never vote for open meetings laws, term limits, the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights, ethics laws, and so much more. Recently, when the legislature arrogantly exempted themselves from open meetings laws, it started a chain reaction I’ve never witnessed in all my decades in politics. Independence Institute, which I run, helped bring together nearly 50 highly diverse organizations that are usually at each other’s throats. We all shared a common concern: government in Colorado is turning opaque. Open records are getting harder to access, open meetings are closing. The “people’s” work is being hidden from the people. And when I say organizations from all over the political spectrum worked together, I’m not exaggerating: Independence Institute, the ACLU, Heidi Ganahl’s conservative Rocky Mountain Voice, the progressive Colorado Times Recorder, Colorado Public Radio, League of Women Voters, Colorado Press Association, Colorado Broadcasters Association, Common Cause, Colorado Black Women for Action, and many, many more. ‘Right to Know’ deniedOver a year-and-a-half of work we crafted a constitutional reform based on what many other states already have, called “Right to Know.” It’s simple: a fundamental right for the people to access public records and government deliberations, with reasonable exceptions. But you won’t see this proposed amendment on your fall ballot. The normally sober state Title Board voted 2–1 to block it. The appointees of Secretary of State Jena Griswold and Attorney General Phil Weiser voted against you being able to vote on governmental transparency. Were they ordered to do so? I’ll let others speculate. Their argument was that your “right to know” the affairs of government isn’t a single subject, and only “single subjects” may go to the ballot. Legislators’ bills must also have a single subject. The difference is they get to decide for themselveswhether a bill qualifies. By contrast, we “the people” must get permission from an unelected board. A set of rules for them; a different set for us. The powerful Title Board said our amendment was too broad. I countered that the state constitution is supposed to contain broad amendments. That didn’t matter. Our team pointed to existing rights guaranteed by Colorado’s constitution, like freedom of speech, religion and the right to keep and bear arms. I asked if we were bringing one of those rights as a citizen initiative today, would it pass “single subject” muster as they now interpret it? They essentially said no. By their interpretation, such basic rights as freedom of speech or religion might be too broad and vague to be considered a single subject. We considered appealing the Title Board’s bizarre decision to the Colorado Supreme Court, but on the advice of lawyers from across the political spectrum, we decided not to. The high court has shown little interest in expanding the public’s right to know what’s going on in their judicial branch. So now, hiding behind the “single subject” rule, altering our constitution to include fundamental rights — like speech, religion, or even a right to know the affairs of government — can be denied to the very people who are supposed to be the government. Some things you can’t make up. Jon Caldara is president of Independence Institute, a free market think tank in Denver.

    6 min
  4. MAY 1

    Big changes to Front Range Rail Taxing Boundaries Proposed

    DENVER–A Democrat-sponsored Senate bill changing the boundaries of the Front Range Passenger Rail special taxing district passed through its first committee hearing on Monday. The bill excludes certain conservative-leaning communities from the district as a tax hike looms for the November ballot. As previously reported by Complete Colorado, the Front Range Passenger Rail, recently named CoCo, short for Colorado Connector, has been in the works since 2021. The plan is to have an up and running passenger rail system operating from Fort Collins to Pueblo by 2029. The current special taxing district is the largest in the state, comprised of 13 counties along the I-25 corridor. All of which are highly likely to be asked for 0.5% sales tax hike this November to fund the project. Senate Bill 26-172 dramatically changes these boundaries, dropping about 40% of the existing special district population. Rather than incorporating every county along I-25 between Wyoming and New Mexico, the proposed legislation includes taxing sweet spots along the rail line. “Of the scenarios that we explored, [this] has some of the highest, but not the highest, tax base, to be able to pay for what we’re proposing to pay for while keeping the tax rate relatively low,” Sal Pace, general manager of the taxing district, said to lawmakers. The new district would include 30 municipalities and would allow others to opt in upon voter approval. The bill also allows incorporated areas to create subdistricts to ask residents to further increase taxes as they see fit. Conservative communities excludedWhile sponsors claim the redrawing was centered around areas in which 20% or more of the population live within a five-mile radius of the planned stations, the bill notably cuts out more conservative communities including Greeley, Lonetree, Monument, and Castle Rock. “The railroad only has so many options as to where it can go south of the city, if that’s the case, why are you including Sterling Ranch and tiny places and not including large areas that’ll be served like Castle Rock and Lone Tree,” Joshua Sharf, senior fellow in fiscal policy with Independence Institute* told Complete Colorado. “If you’re going through the trouble of naming specific municipalities why are you leaving out large population centers?” SB-172 was approved by the Senate Transportation and Energy Committee on April 27. Three amendments were made to the bill, including the removal of Northglenn from the taxing district after Democrat Sen. Kyle Mullica requested the removal on behalf of the Northglenn city government. Randal O’Toole, director of transportation policy at Independence Institute, predicts this rail line, like many others, will end up needing yet more money while pushing its completion date. “Front Range Rail is not going to relieve traffic congestion. It is not going to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. It is going to be a huge money sink, costing a lot more than projected, and it probably won’t operate until long after projected,” O’Toole told Complete Colorado, “Almost no rail passenger project in the last 60 years was done on time or under the originally projected cost; cost overruns of 50 to 100 percent are typical.” The bill was approved 8-1 with GOP Sen. Mark Baisley being the sole no vote. It will now go to the Senate Appropriations Committee in the coming weeks. * Independence Institute is publisher of Complete Colorado

    3 min
  5. MAY 1

    Senate Committee Rejects Gov. Polis’ CPW Commission Appointees

    DENVER—The Colorado Senate Agriculture Committee on April 22 rejected two of the three appointments made by Governor Polis to the Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) Commission. By state law, the CPW commission contains 13 members, 11 of which are appointed by the governor and approved by the Senate. The remaining two members include the executive director of the Department of Natural Resources, and the Colorado Agriculture Commissioner. Frances Blayney, co-owner of a fly-fishing business in Colorado Springs, was approved by the committee unanimously to represent outfitters on the commission, but two others were denied. Thumbs downChris Sichko, a Boulder resident and research economist who has worked with the Department of Agriculture, was shot down by the committee on a 3-4 vote. Tapped to represent sportsman on the commission, Sichko claims he actively participates in small game bow hunting and fishing, but had no support from any Colorado sportsman groups, and has no experience with big game hunting, “I just don’t think we should have somebody filling the sportsman’s seat that has not garnered any support from the sportsman community and doesn’t have the experience to recognize CPW’s funding source from the sportsman community,” Committee Chair Sen. Dylan Roberts said at the meeting. Hunting and fishing licenses make up 58% of CPW funding, and with 12 other applicants with big game hunting experience, the commission turned Sichko away. John Emerick received the most criticism from the committee, voted down 2-5. A retired environmental biology professor, Emerick has a background in environmental and anti-hunting activism and was appointed to the at-large seat in July 2025. Emerick was the Treasurer for Colorado Wild a wolf advocacy group who heavily supported the forced reintroduction measure. He also voted for Proposition 127, the mountain lion hunting ban, that ultimately failed at the ballot box. Emerick defended his positions, saying he was appointed to this seat based on his experience and passion. “I’m not an agriculturalist, I’m not a hunter, but I certainly use our parks. ” Colorado Wildlife Conservation Project wrote a letter the committee, which included 15 sportsman organizations and former CPW staff, urging the senators to “advance appointments that fully meet statutory requirements, avoid conflicts of interest, and rebuild trust with the diverse constituencies that depend on CPW.” “You have a history of very specific activism, which is absolutely your right, and you seem to have done a good job in that space,” Sen Roberts added. “But given the responsibility that the commission has, I do not think you are qualified or prepared or suited to serve in the at-large position.” Former commissioner weighs inRick Enstrom, a former CPW commissioner, says the wildlife agency has become more politicized as of late, due to outside influences. “Much like lobbyists in the legislature, there are NGOs that are feeding direct lines to these commissioners, and it’s muddied up the system.” Enstrom also notes the influence of First Gentleman Marlon Reis, an outspoken animal rights activist, over the decisions of his husband, Governor Polis. “The sportsmen were outraged, nobody could believe it, but once again this isn’t the Governor, these are Marlon Ries’ picks,” Enstrom told Complete Colorado. “Government agencies are not there to be politicized.”

    3 min
  6. APR 27

    Such Hubris Never Before Seen in Colorado

    The great 20th-century historian Lord Acton said it best: “Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” Acton was building on the teachings of his mentor, Homer Simpson, who put it more plainly: “The more power you have, the more you can mess things up. Woo-hoo!” And many in Colorado’s political elite have studied under the original oracle of power, Eric Cartman: “Respect my authoritah!” If there were a motto for the progressive machine that now rules Colorado, it would be simple: “Because we f***ing can, that’s why.” Ethics don’t matter. Consistency doesn’t matter. Respecting the will of the people, or even the institution of democracy itself, doesn’t matter. It started, as these things do, by avoiding consent. TABOR refunds? They stopped even pretending to ask. They know their “fees” wouldn’t survive a vote of the people. Not one of them. So why bother with democracy? The elite know what’s best. And when the rabble express themselves at the ballot box, their will can be… corrected. Voters rejected mandatory setbacks for oil-and-gas drilling. The response from the machine? “That’s adorable,” we’ll pass Senate Bill 181 to do it anyway. Twice I put flat-rate income tax cuts on the ballot. Twice they passed overwhelmingly. So, the legislature moved to make sure voters could never do that again. They added “poison-pill” language to future tax cut initiatives. The ballot must now read: “Voting for this tax cut will cripple small children, steal old ladies’ wheelchairs, and cause cancer in laboratory animals.” When President Donald Trump helped ignite the modern gerrymandering wars, Colorado’s progressive choir howled in outrage. Now Colorado’s progressive machine is using the same trick. The Front Range Rail Authority wants a choo-choo tax. But first, it conveniently trims conservative-leaning counties out of the voting pool. Even Chicago would slow-clap that move. We’re told Trump is a threat to democracy. Maybe. But as far as I know, he hasn’t stripped elected offices away from voters. But our legislature is. The Regional Transportation District is Colorado’s fourth-largest government, run by a 15-member elected board because…the people voted for it to be that way. Senate Bill 150 would gut two-thirds of those elected seats to replace them with insider appointees. When Trump does something heavy-handed, it’s “no kings.” When Colorado’s ruling class does it, it barely earns a shrug. I mean not even a lame fake excuse why it’s not hypocritical. And then there’s the lying. When Trump lies, it’s a five-alarm fire for democracy. But when our elite lie to get what they want, it’s just Tuesday. Senate Bill 135 sends a measure to the ballot to take your TABOR refunds permanently, handing the legislature a blank check. Yet the ballot language conveniently says it’s for “teacher pay” and “smaller class sizes” and, of course, “without raising taxes.” As the state Title Board proved last week, there is no guarantee the money will be spent that way, and 85% of the cash goes straight to lawmakers. Translation: We’re taking your money, but we’re not telling you where it’s going. Lying isn’t an exception anymore. It’s standard operating procedure. And if you want to see Acton proven in real time, look no further than the legislature voting to exempt itself from Colorado’s open meetings law. Read that again slowly, raw power grabbing more power. They’ve decided the transparency rules apply to you, not them. Their confidence has grown so unchecked they now believe they can legislate physics. The governor is expected to drop a last-minute bill, with no time for debate, to move Colorado to 100% renewable energy by 2035. With a stroke of a pen, a state that gets two-thirds of its energy from fossil fuels will do what no state has ever done and do it in nine years. I’ve seen drug-fueled homeless in Denver violently arguing with imaginary people who felt more grounded in reality. And because lording over us is such a burden, Senate Bill 87 would require private employers, at their own expense, to hold jobs open for legislators while they’re off playing Nobles. Raw political power to impose their will — that’s all that matters. Maybe if Republicans had this kind of unchecked power for this long, they’d be just as thuggish. Maybe. We’ll never know. In other words, someone else should cover my job while I’m busy playing Lord Acton. Jon Caldara is president of the Independence Institute in Denver and hosts “The Devil’s Advocate with Jon Caldara” on Colorado Public Television Channel 12. His column appears Sundays in Colorado Politics.

    6 min
  7. APR 23

    Taking a Big-Picture View of the War in Iran

    Obviously, that hasn’t come to pass. There’s little doubt that congressional Democrats who’ve attacked Trump’s every move in this Iran war would be praising a Democrat president who had the foresight and courage to do so on his watch. None did, but if one had, most patriotic Republicans would have surely cheered him on. As for the dominant liberal media, the negative spin in their news stories and commentary about the war have been blatantly dishonest about this overwhelmingly successful campaign. From the very start of the war the stock market plunged, crude oil prices and gasoline at the pump spiked, and an uptick in the CPI signaled price inflation. This was to be expected. The market hates shocks and uncertainty and is very short-sighted. But this war is for long-term security. Stock prices have already recovered, and gas is up less than a buck-a-gallon, that’s still lower than it was during Bidenflation. This isn’t a large-scale war and not likely to last very long. Sacrifices to consumers will be trivial compared to WW II when rationing stamps were issued to all Americans for four long years limiting meat, butter, dairy, coffee, gasoline, coal, tires, cars, shoes, nylon, paper, metal products, and much more. Public opinion polls casting this as an “unpopular war,” are foolishly simplistic and the disapproval percentage is misleadingly skewed by the mass of knee-jerk Democrats who oppose anything associated with Trump. Wars, by their nature, are unpleasant. The small number of U.S. military casualties has been, thankfully, astonishing. (Compare it to the hundreds of thousands of deaths on both sides in the Russian war against Ukraine.) To be sure, this war is far less popular with the ayatollahs on the receiving end. The essential justification for the war is the necessity of it if you can imagine the horrors of nuclear weapons in the hands of the fanatical ayatollahs were they to be launched at their hated “infidels” (that’s all the rest of us). In 1960 during the Cold War, Nikita Krushchev, Chairman of the Communist Party and head of the Soviet Union, spoke at an international conference at the United Nations building in New York. At one point, in a fit of rage (or performance) he took off a shoe and pounded it repeatedly on the desk in front of him, shouting, “We will bury you!” Most people misunderstood his meaning. He was just spewing Marxist ideological dogma that communism would replace capitalism when the workers of the world inevitably rise up in revolution. The Soviets had nukes, but Khrushchev understood that a first strike would be suicidal, triggering an instant nuclear retaliation by the West. Unlike Iran’s ayatollahs, Soviet communists weren’t religious fanatics (they weren’t religious at all; they were atheists). The Cold War nuclear standoff was a stalemate known as “mutual assured destruction” that not only deterred a nuclear war but also a conventional war between the Soviets and NATO in Europe. It’s true that, strategically, Iran’s ayatollahs want nukes as a similar deterrent to protect their regime, just as they used the Strait of Hormuz shutdown to force a ceasefire in this war. But the ayatollahs, as religious fanatics, can be suicidal. If they had nukes, when the inevitable overthrow of their theocracy was imminent, they could joyously launch their nuclear missiles at the infidels to reap their reward in Islamic Heaven. Trump’s recent announcement that Iran accepted his “deal” and met his demands, including opening the Strait and surrendering their enriched uranium, appears to have been premature. The ayatollahs are not known for keeping their promises. If they ultimately do, that’ll be a win for us and the world. If regime change follows, that will be a crowning achievement, especially for most of the Iranians who detest the ruling ayatollahs’ government. Trump-hating congressional Democrats and their media echo chamber, blinded by TDS, scoffed at Trump’s proclaimed good news absurdly stating that, even if true, this expensive war accomplished nothing. To back that argument up, one media wag exclaimed, “The Strait was open before the war; now it’s open again, nothing’s changed.” So much for partisanship ending at the waters’ edge. Mike Rosen is a Denver-based American radio personality and political commentator.

    6 min
  8. APR 23

    Senate Bill 135: Colorado Lawmakers Take Aim at Taxpayer Refunds

    I know this will shock you, but the system is rigged. Maybe not in the conspiracy-theory, tinfoil-hat way. In the simple, obvious, right-in-front-of-your-face way: politicians get to play by rules you don’t. And every now and then they get so brazen about it, you have to stop and admire the hustle. We Coloradans have been painfully clear for decades: We want our Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights (TABOR). We want government spending limits. And, yes, we want our refunds when government takes too much. How many times do we have to say no? 1998, Referendum B. No. 2011, Proposition 103. No. 2013, Amendment 66. No. 2019, Proposition CC. No. 2023, Proposition HH. No. And none of these elections were even close. At this point, voters aren’t whispering. We’re screaming: live within your means. Wearing voters downBut like shrill children demanding mommy buy them something, politicians don’t stop asking. Like the kid, they know they can wear you down. Because if they get a “yes” just once, it’s game over. TABOR refunds disappear forever. And I mean forever. TABOR originally said they could keep excess revenue for four years and only if we voters approved it. Then the Colorado Supreme Court later clarified “four years” actually means… forever. I guess because “four” and “forever” sound kinda the same. Good to know words still have meaning and our political elite keep fighting to “protect democracy” Now comes Senate Bill 135. And you’ll never guess what it does. It ends your TABOR refunds, forever. But don’t worry. This time it’s “for the kids.” Cue the violins. Quite literally what you’ll read on the ballot says the money will go to education. There is no mention of a penny going anywhere else. The ballot language the legislators who want your money wrote practically tucks you in at night: “Shall state investment in K-12 public education increase… increase teacher pay… improve retention… lower class sizes… increase access to career and technical courses, without raising taxes.” It’s beautiful. Inspiring. Almost makes you want to cry. It’s also nonsense. Because buried in the fine print of the bill is the part they hope you never notice. The legislature’s own analysis says this lets the state keep about $1.3 billion extra starting in year one alone. Want to guess how much goes to education? About $200 million. That’s a mere 15%! The other 85%? That’s a blank check for the legislature to spend however it wants. You’d never know that from the ballot language they wrote for themselves. Ballot language double-standardAnd here’s where it gets fun. When politicians refer something to the ballot, they get to write the ballot language you read on Election Day. That is, they get to lie through their teeth. When we lowly citizens propose something, a group of three unelected people called the Title Board writes what voters read at the voting booth. Again, one set of rules for them, a different set for us. So I tried an experiment. I took SB-135 and submitted it, word for word, as a citizen’s initiative. Here’s how the Title Board translated it: “Shall there be a change… allowing the state to keep and spend… and requiring the state to use a portion… for education… and allowing the state to use the rest of the money for any purpose determined by the legislature?” Same policy. Totally different honesty level. So if you vote yes and kiss away your TABOR refunds, education will get a “portion” of it (15%) and the legislature will get “the rest of the money for any purpose.” Their words, not mine. One version sounds like a gift to schoolchildren. The other sounds like what it actually is — a cash grab. And then the legislature had the nerve to call this cash grab “without raising taxes.” There’s no such wording in the Title Board’s language. Which is impressive. If I take more of your money but claim I didn’t, jail time is in my future. When our political elite does it, they’re only encouraged to lie even more next time. So, go ahead. Vote yes this fall if you like the idea of kissing your TABOR refunds goodbye, forever. Just know full well it’s not for the kids. It’s for our lawmakers to cover their rear ends after increasing Medicaid enrollment 200% and over-spending the state into a fiscal hole. Jon Caldara is president of Independence Institute, a free market think in Denver.

    6 min

About

Did you know 46% of the voters in Colorado are unaffiliated? Have you ever wondered why? Hear from the experts at Independence Institute talk about the issues important to Colorado and how to bring some sanity to this increasingly leftist state.

You Might Also Like