Disambiguation

Michael Fauscette

"Disambiguation is the process of removing confusion around terms that express more than one meaning and can lead to different interpretations of the same string of text." Host Michael Fauscette of Arion Research; a leading technology analyst, tech startup advisor, consultant, board member, and storyteller; and his guests "remove the confusion around" artificial intelligence (AI), generative AI and business automation by looking at the business solutions available today to improve business outcomes and gain competitive advantage. 

  1. 4d ago

    From Pilots to Production: Agentic Commerce, Enterprise Trust, and the Quantum Horizon

    In this episode of the Disambiguation podcast, host Michael Fauscette talks with Hemang Upadhyay, Senior Product and AI Leader, about why most AI pilots die the moment they connect to real enterprise infrastructure, what it actually takes to deploy adaptive AI agents in production commerce environments, and how the convergence of AI and quantum computing will reshape enterprise architecture.Hemang has spent more than 16 years as a strategic product leader building AI-driven solutions for US commerce, e-commerce, and technology companies. His work across enterprise automation, AI-powered search, and recommendation engines has generated more than $450 million in combined business impact. He published a paper that won the IEEE Best Paper Award on quantum computing as a service, and has spoken at the AI Genetic Summit, Commerce Media Brand Summit, eTailer Boston, B2B Connect, and Identity Week America.The conversation covers the distinction between conversational AI and agentic AI (chatbots produce language, agents produce consequences), the five-layer pattern for scaling agents from pilot to production (constrain, translate, authorize, observe, recover), why autonomy should live inside the workflow but authority should live outside the model, the shift in commerce from helping customers find products to helping them achieve outcomes, the agent passport concept for identity and trust in agent-to-agent interactions, how mid-market retailers should adopt AI (data readiness first, then journey focus, then capability composition), six security controls for building trust into agentic architectures, the honest framing on AI and jobs (task automation, role redesign, and workforce decisions are related but not identical), and the hybrid future of quantum computing and AI.Timestamps:00:00 - Introduction00:32 - Episode title and guest intro00:48 - Hemang's background: 16+ years in product leadership and AI02:19 - Simplifying complexity across digital commerce04:45 - Research, speaking, and the IEEE best paper on quantum as a service07:05 - Conversational AI vs agentic AI: language vs consequences08:30 - Five components of an agent: goal, reasoning, memory, tools, authority10:00 - Connecting probabilistic decisions to deterministic systems12:42 - Scaling from pilot to production: the five-layer pattern13:45 - Constrain, translate, authorize, observe, recover17:36 - Autonomy inside the workflow, authority outside the model18:03 - Commerce agents: from product discovery to outcome achievement18:52 - Amazon Rufus to Alexa shopping transition20:06 - The apartment furnishing example: scattered work to one plan23:12 - Agent-to-agent identity: the agent passport concept25:18 - Authentication vs authorization at the moment of action28:00 - Mid-market retailers: start with focus, not scale29:25 - Data readiness: agents make bad decisions faster on bad data31:14 - Capability composition and graduated autonomy33:17 - Trust: does the system remain safe when the model is wrong?34:23 - Six practical controls for agentic security37:22 - Governance as executable policy inside the product39:00 - AI and jobs: three effects, not one narrative42:22 - Which parts of my work are becoming easier to automate?44:07 - Quantum computing and AI convergence: the hybrid future46:07 - Quantum as a service: orchestration across classical, AI, and quantum47:32 - Three actions for business leaders on quantum readiness50:03 - Recommendations: Ethan Mollick and Andrew NgGuest: Hemang Upadhyay, Senior Product & AI LeaderHost: Michael Fauscette, CEO & Chief Analyst, Arion ResearchSubscribe and turn on notifications so you never miss an episode.

    From Pilots to Production: Agentic Commerce, Enterprise Trust, and the Quantum Horizon
  2. Sep 2

    Beyond the Chat Window: Why Real Human-AI Collaboration Requires a Completely Different Product

    In this episode of the Disambiguation podcast, host Michael Fauscette talks with Tim Lidman, Co-Founder and CEO of Clyde AI, about why the chat window is not the right interface for real human-AI collaboration, why most companies are stuck building Frankenstein workbenches of cobbled-together AI tools, and what it actually takes to design a product where humans and AI work together as a hybrid team.Tim's career traces the entire evolution of enterprise collaboration. He started in tech sales at WebEx and Cisco selling audio conferencing, moved to SAP SuccessFactors, then founded Think Tank, a structured collaboration platform based on decades of research into behavioral science and group decision support systems. Think Tank was acquired by Accenture in 2021, where Tim operated as a partner for four years. He co-founded Clyde AI with Chris Bricker to build what he calls AI-native collaboration: a product where AI is a first-class citizen in the architecture and UX, not bolted on top of legacy workflows.The conversation covers Tim's contrarian take on LLMs and the promise of natural language interfaces (prompt engineering and context engineering are just new paradigms users have to learn, not the elimination of paradigms), why single-threaded chat is the wrong model for complex problem solving, the AI advisor concept (multi-threaded AI with separate domain knowledge and personas working in parallel without polluting each other's context), the design blueprint of mapping what AI is good at against what humans are good at, why humans are still better at inventing new information and making judgment calls, the Frankenstein workbench problem (employees cobbling together tools just to check the AI box), fear-driven adoption as terrible leadership, the micro win approach (20 minutes to solve one small problem and build trust), why anyone using AI for more than 10% of their workflow is ahead of 99.99% of workers, why the term change management may not survive (change is now constant, not a project with a start and end date), the people-process-technology split that must blend into one unified experience, and the industrial revolution parallel compressed 100x.Timestamps:00:00 - Introduction00:31 - Episode title and guest intro00:50 - Tim's background: heavy metal drummer to tech sales to collaboration to AI02:07 - The golden thread: evolution of collaboration from audio conferencing to AI03:15 - Enterprise social networking: Microsoft buys Yammer for $1.2 billion03:42 - Think Tank: structured collaboration and group decision support systems05:32 - The hypothesis for Clyde: AI removing expensive synthesis work06:41 - What AI cannot replace: tribal knowledge, human judgment, buy-in08:13 - Building Clyde: AI where AI excels, human UX where humans excel09:33 - AI advisors: multi-threaded thinking inside a collaborative workspace11:14 - The chat window problem: LLMs created a new paradigm, not eliminated one14:03 - Putting the onus on the tool to extract context and intent16:19 - Single-threaded chat vs multi-threaded problem solving18:37 - Example: business plan with parallel risk, strategy, and financial advisors20:29 - Legacy tools bolting AI on top of old architectures22:32 - Fear-driven adoption: use AI or you are fired29:10 - Building hybrid teams: human-to-human vs human-to-AI collaboration30:52 - Humans can invent new information; AI is pattern recognition34:38 - Change is now constant, not a project with start and end dates36:28 - The term change management may not survive38:32 - Continuous optimization: building and optimizing happen simultaneously41:42 - People-process-technology must blend into one unified experience44:11 - The industrial revolution parallel, compressed 100x46:27 - Recommendation: Sapiens by Yuval Harari47:20 - Recommendation: CEO of Lovable, 0 to $100M ARR in nine monthsGuest: Tim Lidman, Co-Founder & CEO, Clyde AIHost: Michael Fauscette, CEO & Chief Analyst, Arion Research

    Beyond the Chat Window: Why Real Human-AI Collaboration Requires a Completely Different Product
  3. Aug 26

    From AI Sprawl to AI Impact: Why Picking One Workflow and Going Deep Is the Only Strategy That Works

    In this episode of the Disambiguation podcast, host Michael Fauscette talks with Chris Fitkin, Co-Founder and Partner at Metacto, about why most companies are spreading AI experiments too thin across every department, why that wide-and-shallow approach produces shelfware instead of results, and what it actually takes to get AI into production in the mid-market.Chris has 25 years in software engineering, a master's in software engineering, and is an AWS Certified Solutions Architect. He has been a CTO in cybersecurity, led due diligence at private equity firms, and co-founded Metacto with Garrett Fritz. The firm started in mobile app development and fractional CTO work, then pivoted to operational AI for mid-market and private equity-backed companies after seeing how dramatically the landscape was shifting.The conversation covers the AI sprawl problem (88% of companies are using AI in at least one function per McKinsey, but only 5% see measurable impact per MIT), the repeating cycle of cool demo to mixed results to low adoption to shelfware, why companies that go narrow and deep are more than twice as likely to see measurable bottom-line impact compared to those that scatter experiments across the organization, the Five Signals framework for picking your first AI workflow (email, spreadsheets, copy-paste relays, contactless approvals, repeat expert answers, report factories), why mundane workflows are the right starting point, the 5%/95% gap between demo and production (access control, business rules, quality checks, human review, audit trails, monitoring, versioning, ownership), failure modes that compound when nobody catches a bad LLM decision for five days, context engineering and the three parts of building good context (transactional data, document corpus, codified business rules and domain knowledge), why business first has to replace AI first, the mid-market pricing reality (Anthropic offered one client $1.2 million a year in token minimums, Mars Inc pays $600,000 a month to Google Gemini), the AI Engineering Maturity Index assessment tied to EBITDA and enterprise value, and practical advice for stuck leaders.Timestamps:02:07 - Change is the only constant across 25 years of technology cycles03:19 - App Store submissions doubled while downloads decreased04:16 - AI sprawl: 88% using AI, only 5% see measurable impact05:09 - The shelfware cycle: cool demo, mixed results, low adoption07:20 - Shadow AI is the new shadow IT07:43 - Narrow and deep is 2x more likely to produce bottom-line impact08:43 - Going deep: problem first, define success metrics before you build11:14 - Solution looking for a problem versus problem looking for a solution12:27 - Five Signals framework for picking your first AI workflow13:03 - Mundane workflows are validated by human capital investment14:31 - The 5%/95% gap: demo is 5% of the work, production is 95%16:05 - Failure modes: bad decisions compounding, admin database access exposed16:59 - Context engineering versus prompt engineering19:06 - Transactional data: clean, current, deduplicated data warehouse19:27 - Document corpus: proposals, QBRs, deliverables tagged with recency20:04 - Business rules and domain knowledge: codifying what lives in people's heads21:32 - Business first, not AI first: product managers lead engagements22:25 - Requirements engineering: the discipline everyone is rediscovering24:01 - The mid-market gap: too small for McKinsey, too complex for license distribution26:42 - Start small, measure lift, use wins to fund the next projects27:51 - AI Engineering Maturity Index: 30-day assessment tied to financial metrics33:54 - Focus on people: dedicated time, builders and advocates, adoption training36:52 - Leading a hybrid workforce: managing human and digital workers38:33 - Recommendation: Reid Hoffman's Masters of Scale with IBM CEO Arvind KrishnaGuest: Chris Fitkin, Co-Founder & Partner, MetactoHost: Michael Fauscette, CEO & Chief Analyst, Arion Research

    From AI Sprawl to AI Impact: Why Picking One Workflow and Going Deep Is the Only Strategy That Works
  4. Aug 19

    Innovation Is a Leadership Problem: Why the Forces That Kill New Products Are Now Killing AI Adoption

    In this episode of the Disambiguation podcast, host Michael Fauscette talks with Robyn Bolton, Founder and Chief Navigator of MileZero, about why the same organizational forces that have been killing innovation for decades are now killing AI adoption, and what leaders can do differently.Robyn's career started at Procter & Gamble, where she helped develop Swiffer, one of the most successful consumer product launches in recent history. From there she became a partner at Boston Consulting Group and then worked at Innosight, Clayton Christensen's innovation firm. She now runs MileZero, where she works with Fortune 500 companies like Medtronic, Nike, and Nestle to build pragmatic innovation capabilities. She published Unlocking Innovation last year and teaches at Massachusetts College of Art and Design.The conversation covers why innovation is a leadership problem and not an ideas problem (organizations are full of ideas, but leadership behaviors train people to stop sharing them), the five organizational antibodies that neutralize anything new and unfamiliar, how those same antibodies show up in AI adoption, the Revenge of Clippy (a Fortune 500 company launched a custom chatbot and employees responded with malicious compliance, asking questions they already knew the answer to just to check the box), why Robyn now defends innovation theater when companies commit to the season rather than just the show, the ABCs framework (Architecture, Behavior, Culture) and why 30 years of focusing on architecture alone has produced no improvement in corporate innovation results, the AI pilot trap and why falling in love with the solution instead of the problem is the root cause, Jobs to be Done applied to AI adoption, why automating a broken process just makes it fail faster, continuous change versus project-based change management, why scale needs to be defined at the start of a pilot because not everything should go company-wide, human infrastructure as the missing budget line in AI readiness, the replacement mistake versus AI-augmented humans, the sycophancy problem in LLMs and why manufactured trust is dangerous, and practical advice for stuck leaders.Timestamps:00:00 - Introduction00:31 - Episode title and guest intro00:47 - Robyn's path: P&G, Swiffer, BCG, Christensen's firm, MileZero02:08 - Choosing process over product: the deeper root cause03:57 - Innovation is a leadership problem, not an ideas problem05:46 - Logical responses with unintended consequences07:57 - Organizational antibodies and AI adoption09:09 - The Revenge of Clippy: malicious compliance with a company chatbot11:13 - Defending innovation theater: the season versus the show14:33 - Change management as a checklist versus ongoing behavior change15:12 - The gym analogy: one visit does not make you healthy16:00 - The ABCs framework: Architecture, Behavior, Culture16:32 - 30 years since the Innovator's Dilemma, results have not changed19:23 - The AI pilot trap: fall in love with the problem, not the solution21:22 - People, workflow, culture, technology: in that order21:53 - Incentives determine behavior: change the metrics, change the outcome23:13 - Jobs to be Done applied to AI adoption24:12 - Blank sheet of paper: stop cramming AI into broken processes25:45 - Continuous change versus project-based change management26:57 - Learning mindset: reassess after every step28:52 - Scientific method applied to business: test hypotheses individually32:06 - What scale really means: not everything goes company-wide33:16 - Human infrastructure and AI readiness34:06 - The replacement mistake: AI augments, not replaces35:53 - Sycophancy and manufactured trust in LLMs38:01 - Practical advice: find the problem, ask why, use the five whys39:48 - Recommendation: The Coaching Habit by Michael Bungay StanierGuest: Robyn Bolton, Founder & Chief Navigator, MileZeroHost: Michael Fauscette, CEO & Chief Analyst, Arion Research

    Innovation Is a Leadership Problem: Why the Forces That Kill New Products Are Now Killing AI Adoption
  5. Aug 12

    You Can't Automate a Broken Process: Why AI Readiness Starts with the Work, Not the Tools

    In this episode of the Disambiguation podcast, host Michael Fauscette talks with Justin Watt, Co-Founder and CEO of Switchboard, about why mid-market companies cannot just layer AI onto broken processes and scattered data and expect results, and what they need to do first.Justin's path ran from IBM, where he worked on large government projects and learned more about what not to do than what to do, through MetaLab working with Silicon Valley companies like Amazon and Uber, through project management and IT leadership, to co-founding Switchboard, which focuses on helping mid-market non-tech companies modernize and adopt AI and automation.The conversation covers why "digital transformation" has run its course as a term (most companies replaced tools but never actually transformed how they work), why Justin uses "modernization" instead, the 2006 problem (90% of mid-market leaders think their organization is technically capable because someone can build a pivot table in Excel), the "Data Lake" Excel file (a real client who named their spreadsheet that), why Excel came out the same year as Back to the Future and many companies still run their data on it, human duct tape (paying people to move spreadsheet cells between files), the 14,000-row rate sheet across four Excel files maintained by different people, why automating a broken process just automates the brokenness, mapping processes before touching technology, the governance gap (most companies treat governance as a log instead of a framework), the HR chatbot disaster (a company rolled out a chatbot that let interns look up everyone's salary and performance reviews), goal-based AI risks (the Anthropic vending machine story where someone got five iPhones for $500), board pressure without a defined outcome, margin driving versus revenue driving, the crawl-walk-run approach, and practical first steps for mid-market leaders.Timestamps:00:00 - Introduction00:31 - Episode title and guest intro00:45 - Justin's path: IBM, MetaLab, Switchboard01:52 - Learning what not to do at IBM: meetings about meetings02:58 - McKinsey stat: 65% of digital transformation fails, 90% is change management04:02 - Why "modernization" instead of "digital transformation"06:13 - The 2006 problem: 90% of leaders stuck technically06:40 - Your A-player's tech skill is a pivot table09:19 - The Matrix Code moment: a client's breakthrough10:59 - The "Data Lake" Excel file11:47 - Human duct tape: people moving cells between spreadsheets14:09 - The 14,000-row rate sheet across four files15:18 - You cannot automate a broken process16:40 - Map the process: get everyone in the room18:10 - A third of steps exist because of software limitations19:15 - SaaS trust is gone: ten years of "it's on the roadmap"20:06 - Governance is a log, not a framework21:27 - The HR chatbot disaster: interns looking up salaries24:36 - Trust and connecting AI to internal data26:33 - Goal-based AI exposes bad goal definition27:22 - The Anthropic vending machine: five iPhones for $50029:15 - Board pressure without a defined outcome31:13 - AI for margin driving, freeing time for revenue33:14 - First three months is modernization, not AI35:22 - Pick the most broken area and map the process37:34 - Just start playing with AI personally39:48 - Recommendation: Ben Evans quarterly AI macro presentationGuest: Justin Watt, Co-Founder & CEO, SwitchboardHost: Michael Fauscette, CEO & Chief Analyst, Arion ResearchSubscribe and turn on notifications so you never miss an episode.

    You Can't Automate a Broken Process: Why AI Readiness Starts with the Work, Not the Tools
  6. Aug 5

    The Identity Threat: Why AI Adoption Is a Human Challenge, Not a Technology Problem

    In this episode of the Disambiguation podcast, host Michael Fauscette talks with Eva Minkoff, Founder of Bold Being, about why AI adoption failures are not technology problems but identity threats, and why organizations cannot train or explain their way through them.Eva spent two decades in healthcare across clinical research, bedside care, media, marketing, and startups as both a co-founder and early employee. She gave a TEDx talk called "Five Minutes to Fix Our Broken Healthcare System" about the patient-doctor relationship and the collapse of self-trust under relentless pressure. That same pattern of pressure-driven identity loss is now playing out across every industry as AI reaches professionals whose authority and sense of legitimacy are built on a specific kind of expertise.The conversation covers why AI adoption is an identity threat rather than a change management problem, why employee sabotage of AI initiatives (30 to 70 percent in some studies) is survival behavior rather than insubordination, the Luddite parallel (skilled workers whose livelihoods were being erased, not irrational resisters), why you cannot explain someone out of an identity threat, compliance theater (employees using AI to produce outputs and then quietly redoing the work themselves), decision latency in leaders who were previously decisive, leadership brittleness (senior leaders going rigid or withdrawing under AI pressure), Eva's three-stage framework (instability, autopilot, durable agency), sustainable adaptability versus just staying current, regulated empathy in healthcare and its parallel in every industry, a client transformation story (Chief Patient Safety Officer who eliminated ED wait times and saved $50 million after doing identity work rather than operational work and was promoted to CMO), and three practical steps leaders should take right now: name the instability out loud, audit your own autopilot, and change the metric from adoption speed to adaptive capacity.Timestamps:00:00 - Introduction00:41 - Eva's background: two decades in healthcare, TEDx talk, coaching03:20 - Daughter born on ChatGPT launch day: living in both disruptions04:04 - Identity threat versus change management06:26 - Employee sabotage: the Luddite movement of our era07:16 - Survival behavior, not insubordination09:09 - Skills training assumes a knowledge barrier, the real barrier is psychological09:59 - Not ethical unpreparedness but human unpreparedness10:09 - Decision latency, performative adoption, compliance theater11:13 - Leadership brittleness12:24 - Resistance is information, not a problem to suppress15:57 - Three-stage framework: instability, autopilot, durable agency19:22 - Sustainable adaptability: not staying current, building internal capacity22:07 - Holding ambiguity without defaulting to paralysis23:47 - Healthcare as the most human-dependent industry25:08 - Regulated empathy: suppressing emotional responses as default operating mode27:33 - Client story: Chief Patient Safety Officer to CMO in one year30:06 - Three practical steps for leaders30:49 - Step one: name the instability out loud31:40 - Step two: audit your own autopilot32:48 - Step three: change the metric to adaptive capacity34:45 - Recommendation: Brene Brown, Atlas of the Heart, shame versus guiltGuest: Eva Minkoff, Founder, Bold BeingEva is currently conducting research interviews for her book on how senior leaders are navigating AI-driven change. If that is your experience right now, request a private 30-minute conversation here: calendly.com/boldbeing/conversation To connect further: LinkedInWebsiteHuman Leadership Now Substack/NewsletterHost: Michael Fauscette, CEO & Chief Analyst, Arion ResearchSubscribe and turn on notifications so you never miss an episode.

    The Identity Threat: Why AI Adoption Is a Human Challenge, Not a Technology Problem
  7. Jul 29

    From Pen and Paper to Agentic Workflows: Building AI That Works in the Real World

    In this episode of the Disambiguation podcast, host Michael Fauscette talks with Omid Pakseresht, CEO of Good Folio, about what it takes to build AI systems that actually work in enterprise settings, why model quality is no longer the bottleneck, and why adoption is a design problem that starts long before the technology.Omid studied math at Oxford and quantitative finance, built risk management tools, and was the first product person at two AI startups focused on knowledge graphs for finance and supply chain. He founded Good Folio about five years ago as an applied AI venture platform that sits between a platform company and a venture studio, where each deployment improves the next through cross-domain learnings and reusable infrastructure.The conversation covers the Unilever engagement (computer vision for small retail stores across Indonesia, Philippines, and Pakistan where markets went from pen and paper straight to agentic WhatsApp workflows, skipping digitization entirely), the Inspector product (AI-driven financial promotion compliance that redesigned the function rather than automating it), why better models no longer directly lead to better outcomes, why the constraint is now system design rather than model performance, the discovery process for mapping workflows and identifying leverage points, why building agents is like hiring new people for your organization, architectural choices driven by where workflow risk sits (small distributed models for emerging markets vs. strict guardrails for compliance), the cross-vertical pattern of systems over models, why incentive alignment is the most underappreciated adoption bottleneck, why too much focus on efficiency crowds out growth thinking, why adoption is a design problem, pilot fatigue, and practical advice for business leaders.Timestamps:00:00 - Introduction00:44 - Omid's background: Oxford, finance, AI startups, the hospital backroom moment02:39 - Good Folio: applied AI that works in enterprise settings03:46 - The venture platform model: most AI problems are system-level problems06:01 - Unilever: computer vision in emerging-market retail06:51 - From pen and paper straight to agentic WhatsApp workflows08:42 - Vision AI and agent systems for orders and replenishment09:34 - 5-8% sales increase in fast-moving consumer goods10:20 - Inspector: financial promotion compliance11:19 - AI-generated content creates more marketing but also more risk11:51 - Continuous monitoring agents trained with compliance officers12:53 - Marketing happier, compliance can sleep at night14:24 - The shift from model performance to workflow design15:05 - Better models don't directly link to better outcomes15:55 - Impressive pilots that don't scale17:22 - Discovery: mapping workflows and identifying leverage points18:25 - Building agents is like hiring new people19:03 - Building is the fast part; understanding requirements is the hard part21:15 - Architectural choices driven by workflow risk23:18 - Same technology, deployed differently for compliance25:17 - Cross-vertical patterns: systems over models26:50 - The adoption bottleneck: incentive alignment28:41 - Adoption as a design problem31:00 - Don't start with "what can I do?" Start with "where does the system break?"33:23 - Pilot fatigue and why the first success unlocks the rest34:38 - Recommendation: Matt Lerner, Growth LeversGuest: Omid Pakseresht, CEO, Good FolioHost: Michael Fauscette, CEO & Chief Analyst, Arion ResearchSubscribe and turn on notifications so you never miss an episode.

    From Pen and Paper to Agentic Workflows: Building AI That Works in the Real World
  8. Jul 22

    AI as a Human Problem: Why Change Management Is Broken and Storytelling Is the Fix

    In this episode of the Disambiguation podcast, host Michael Fauscette talks with Gavin McMahon, Co-Founder and CEO of fassforward, about why AI adoption is not a technology problem but a human problem, why traditional change management is broken, and how storytelling can move people through the fear and uncertainty that AI has created.Gavin is an engineer by training with 30 years of consulting experience across automotive, defense, and technology. He worked at Gartner during the early internet era, helping move the company from paper delivery to online. In 2001, he co-founded fassforward, which has grown into a leadership and storytelling consultancy serving clients like Verizon and Mastercard. He recently published Story Business.The conversation covers why change management is a power dynamic problem (change managers have responsibility but no power), the shift from change management to change leadership, why the rate limiter on AI adoption is the organization's appetite for change, Hemingway's iceberg theory and how people fill in scary narratives when leaders leave gaps, the staircase problem (going down toward productivity is a race to the bottom), the shopping mall to Amazon value shift and why it is happening in dog years with AI, the motive triangle of hope, fear, and reason, why employees are sabotaging AI initiatives and the IKEA retraining model as the right approach, why AI works like an army of ants at the word and sentence level while humans think at book and chapter level, the production / coordination / judgment framework for splitting work, the judgment pipeline gap, why leaders should ask "am I using traditional thinking to solve a nontraditional problem," the tragedy of the commons across individual, organizational, and societal competition, the social media parallel, and why there is no AI strategy (just AI accelerating your business strategy).Timestamps:00:00 - Introduction00:44 - Gavin's background: engineering, Gartner, fassforward, Story Business01:41 - Why AI is about human engineering: decision and judgment03:07 - Execution validates strategy04:44 - Why "change management" is the wrong term05:39 - The power dynamic: responsibility without power06:50 - Change leadership, not change management07:30 - The rate limiter: organizational appetite for change09:08 - You lead people, you manage work10:06 - The river and rapids metaphor: pools of stillness11:27 - Storytelling as a mechanism for AI adoption11:52 - Hemingway's iceberg theory: people fill in the scary parts13:26 - AI as productivity hack vs. real workflow change15:50 - The staircase: going down toward productivity is a race to the bottom17:22 - Shopping mall to Amazon: a 20-year value shift in dog years20:00 - The motive triangle: hope, fear, and reason23:38 - Employee sabotage and the origin of the word "sabotage"25:20 - IKEA's retraining model: the right way to activate AI26:38 - AI-sized peg in a square hole28:52 - AI is an army of ants, not a human-shaped replacement31:15 - Production, coordination, and judgment: the three types of work33:27 - The judgment pipeline gap: pig in a python35:19 - Am I using traditional thinking for a nontraditional problem?36:32 - Tragedy of the commons: competition at every level42:17 - The social media parallel: same path, faster45:25 - What leaders should do first: business strategy, not AI strategy47:53 - The Chief Blank Officer as a telltale sign49:09 - Recommendation: Bryce Hoffman and Red TeamingGuest: Gavin McMahon, Co-Founder & CEO, fassforwardHost: Michael Fauscette, CEO & Chief Analyst, Arion ResearchSubscribe and turn on notifications so you never miss an episode.

    AI as a Human Problem: Why Change Management Is Broken and Storytelling Is the Fix

Ratings & Reviews

About

"Disambiguation is the process of removing confusion around terms that express more than one meaning and can lead to different interpretations of the same string of text." Host Michael Fauscette of Arion Research; a leading technology analyst, tech startup advisor, consultant, board member, and storyteller; and his guests "remove the confusion around" artificial intelligence (AI), generative AI and business automation by looking at the business solutions available today to improve business outcomes and gain competitive advantage.