The Nutrition Grouch

Todd Weber, PhD

The weight loss industry is, has been, and always will be a dumpster fire.  People like to say health & wellness (of which weight loss is a part of) is “broken” or full of “misinformation” but that is being too generous because it implies that some of it is good or that it is actually fixable.  It is damaged beyond repair.  If it were possible, I would burn it to the ground and start over.     While it is impractical to try to summarize what’s wrong with the industry in one podcast description, my premise is this: there is a truly astronomical amount of information that neither our media nor our professionals are able to communicate to you in a meaningful way without losing all context, applicability to real life, and/or the ability to see how all of the pieces fit together.   The media should just stop covering health & wellness because their soundbites explain nothing and are little more than headlines and talking points.  They may raise awareness but not understanding, leading to the illusion of explanatory depth.  Academics actually know what they are talking about and could help educate us but are too busy with their work and only some are engaged with the public.  Most academics look down on and laugh at the quacks and zealots in the field but it’s the quacks and zealots that have the real power.   Businesses do not have the right people in place (PhDs or medical professionals) to drive product and service development (that’s left to the MBAs).  After the brand is established, the number one rule is that you must protect and promote the brand no matter how myopic, self-serving, or unimportant that brand is.  Healthcare is for the (already) sick and public health is so surface level.   When it comes to their health, the public is lazy.  They want the most entertaining, convenient, and positive information available, even if it is at the expense of achieving their goals.  Hard work, I think not.  Let me take the path of least resistance and “do it on the side”.  There’s no reason for real change.   Instead of being stuck in pedaling the news of the day, disconnected factoids and tidbits, overly reductionist, cliché, idealistic, magic cures, easy fixes, secrets, tips, tricks, hacks, fads, gimmicks, cherry-picked, binary, good/bad, flashy, insanely optimistic, exaggerated, fantasy land, sunshine and rainbows, theoretical, testimonial based weight loss information -- let’s come up with a more comprehensive, systematic, sustainable, realistic, semi-automated, results-oriented, pragmatic approach to weight loss with a slice of common sense.     I’ve spent an inordinate amount of time (years and decades) thinking about the thousands of nuances of weight loss (just Google Energy Balance Nutrition Consulting, The Paper Database, or The Science of Dieting).  I’ve also spent thousands of hours trying to understand why the health & wellness field isn’t actually science based despite the information being readily available.   I am so fed up and exhausted by it all.  It is so broken that on many days I want to say forget it.  I’m done with this.  It can’t be fixed.  I’m a smart motivated guy that can take my talents elsewhere (LeBron).  But something keeps drawing me back.  It’s like a sickness or a bad relationship.  I just can’t get out of it.  At my core, it’s who I am.  In this podcast I want to offer you truly science-based weight loss advice, critiques of the weight loss industry/diet culture, and thoughts on my experiences and failings in the profession.  And with that, I bring you The Nutrition Grouch.

  1. JAN 14

    50: What's Enough? Part II: Obsessions

    Half of the things that we think we “have to do” are not essential.  “I have to watch that football game”.  “I have to get my daughter’s teacher a Christmas present”.  “I have to get new clothes for work”.   “I have to get to the gym today”. And many of the things that we “obsess about” and the goals that we pursue in the long term, really aren’t all that important in the grand scheme of things.  And yet we keep ourselves so busy pursuing things that are not essential to our health and happiness.   In today’s episode the Nutrition Grouch suggests that you take the time to figure out what your “core essentials” are to your health and happiness on a daily, weekly, monthly, and quarterly basis.  Figure out what you actually “really” need to take care of to further your health and happiness and what things can you forget about or let slide. I’m not saying that we forgo our duties and responsibilities, aim for mediocrity, be lazy or take the easy path, rather there are things in this life that matter and things that do not.  Put your time and energy into the things that matter and minimize the rest. Some of the topics in today’s episode include:  Not everyone needs the drive of Tom Brady to be successful (1:57)Sometimes the right conditions are more important than talent for success (3:50)Aaron Rodgers won a Super Bowl and said, “now what?” (8:50)Singular obsessions and mastering your craft (10:08)Everyone’s got trauma: my PhD and career are mine (11:44)My obsession with nutrition education hasn’t led to success (13:08)I’m just not willing to “play the game” (14:04)Changing the culture of health & wellness and your relationship with it (15:29)The dark side of obsessions: unintended consequences (19:21)Finding like-minded, science-based wellness people is nearly impossible (23:20)Team up together or get squashed (26:12)Do what you are designed to do (29:06)A Buffalo Bills Super Bowl will never be enough (32:28)I HATE Christmas (37:15)My problem with “Forced Holidays” (37:57)Giving and receiving gifts is not my cup of tea (40:24)The time I found out why saying “Good Morning” is SO IMPORTANT (41:39)I have a two activities per weekend limit (43:21)If you seek tranquility, do less (44:43)Our pace of life, diet, and lifestyle are NOT normal, but it doesn’t have to be this way (46:09)What’s enough?: daily, weekly, monthly, and quarterly goals (51:41)Unrestrained moderation (53:58)

    56 min
  2. 12/17/2025

    49: What's Enough?

    How much of anything do you really need?  What’s enough to make you happy?  In today’s episode The Nutrition Grouch wrestles with the idea of “what’s enough?”. So many of us have so much, and yet, it never seems to be enough.  Humans have an insatiable appetite for more.  But more isn’t always better and more doesn’t necessarily lead to happiness. In obesity, we clearly have exceeded, “what’s enough?”, in terms of calories.  But why do we consume some so many calories in the first place?  I think it at least partially has to do with our appetite for more, leading us to overextend, spread ourselves too thin, and stress ourselves out. So, in asking, “what’s enough?”, I’m not only asking you to consider what’s enough in terms of calories and pleasure, but I’m searching much further into everything outside of nutrition in your day-to-day lives, material possessions, needs, wants, and desires. By asking, “what’s enough?”, and scaling back on both our caloric and non-caloric needs, wants, and desires, perhaps we can reset our “what’s enough?” equilibrium and carve out more time for meal planning, grocery shopping, and cooking, things that will ultimately lead to increased health and happiness. Some of the topics in today’s episode include:  What’s Enough?, is not minimalism, it’s more like essentialism (1:41)The myth of “having it all” and being able to “do it all” (2:10)It sucks getting rid of something you later actually need (6:16)What were some of your greatest Christmas gifts growing up? (9:05)Expectation setting (9:05)The Joneses aren’t that happy (11:32)Can money buy you happiness? Yes and no (13:39)Focusing on what you don’t have rather than what you do have (18:02)“If you’ve got your health, you’ve got the world by the balls” (25:52)How many cups of coffee do you drink? (28:19)Use only what you need (29:29)Flattening your high (31:36)Dopamine fasting misses the point (34:01)The Hungry Brain’s advice: moderate palatability foods (36:06)What’s Enough: Food Frequency, Portion Size, Energy Density (42:27)Mel Robbins: The Let Them Theory (49:26)

    52 min
  3. 11/19/2025

    48: What Will Weight Loss Advice in 2035 Look Like?

    The world, technology, and the pace of our lives seems to move faster and faster each year.  Your life not that long ago is different in so many ways from the one you’re living today.  But what about the food you eat?  Has that changed?  To any casual social media observer, dietary advice and what you’re supposed to eat seems to change every day. And yet, dietary advice has barely budged in the last 40 years!  Starting in 1980, the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGAs) have encouraged Americans to limit saturated fat, cholesterol, sodium, alcohol, and yes, excess sugar. In today’s episode, The Nutrition Grouch talks about how the low-carbohydrate advocates rail against the DGAs as being too carbohydrate based, yet their wish to make the DGAs more fat and protein based are historically, environmentally, health, and budgetarily impractical. Overly reductionist scientific factoids and tidbits are great for producing unlimited social media content but lack the big picture programming, interconnectedness, and nuance, housed Ato Z in one location, required for successful lifestyle change and optimal wellness. And finally, the Grouch wishes we could burn all of health & wellness down and start over, beginning anew with only those who meet a minimum bar of competence.  But he knows that won’t happen because marketing, persuasion, and entertainment are what drives nutrition, not cold hard facts and science.  Weight loss advice in 2035 will probably look a lot like it looks in 2025.  The 5 Universal Laws of Weight Loss, Your Behavioral Obesity Risk Score (BORS), The 3 and Only 3 Ways to Cut Calories, and Nutrition Rules and Decision Fatigue will remain pillars of any good lifestyle management plan.  There are no magic cures, quick fixes, or even science (outside of GLP-1s) coming to save us.  Some of the topics in today’s episode include:  1980: the first edition of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGAs) (3:27)The 7 dietary guidelines of 1980 (3:50)The 4 dietary guidelines of 2020 – 2025 (4:13)The DGAs have NEVER promoted eating sugar (5:28)It’s easier to reduce saturated fat than it is to reduce carbohydrate (8:12)It’s completely impractical for everyone to eat low carb (8:54)Food labeling is so deceptive (and yet within the rules) (10:58)When fad diets become part of your personal identity (14:01)Mainstream, regular diet advice is BORING! (16:34)Why are we obese? Occam’s razor: too many calories (17:24)Keeping the nutrition waters muddy is advantageous to most (22:27)Why social media cannot and will never work for nutrition education (23:24)People are ok with being lied to if it makes them feel safe/ok (28:32)In dieting, nothing is ever new, everything is just recycled (30:09)All of nutrition can be viewed through one of two lenses/camps (32:45)Exercising cells in a flask is not exercise (36:48)I hate supplements, especially in grocery stores (40:10)An endless amount of overly reductionist nutrition advice (42:18)Who is best at giving nutrition advice? (43:52)Timeless nutrition advice (49:32)Blow up health & wellness and start over from scratch (54:22)Marketing and entertainment will always dominate nutrition (56:17)The ENORMOUS DANGER of non expert persuasive speech (58:55)

    1h 9m
  4. 11/05/2025

    47: Food Addiction

    Food addiction is a somewhat controversial topic.  Can you really be “addicted” to something necessary for life (i.e., food, air, water)?  Based upon the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and Yale Food Addiction Scale (YFAS), the technical answer is, yes. In today’s episode, The Nutrition Grouch asks whether the identification of food addiction is helpful to clients and practitioners in losing weight or whether it provides a “permission structure” enabling them to continue eating junk food and becoming an excuse for their ultimate failure. Based on the YFAS, 25% of people with overweight or obesity are food addicted but interestingly, so are 11% of normal weight individuals.  Is food addiction concept creep or a simple expression such as “I’m starving” or “I’m freezing” or is there something more to it? While there’s no clear answer to any of these questions, the frontline therapies for people with and without food addiction for weight loss are very similar: medications, lifestyle modification, and bariatric surgery.  We love to blame individuals for addictions; however, culture and environment are often overlooked, ignored or downplayed. Some of the topics in today’s episode include:  Food addiction as concept creep (0:28)Is food addiction a permission structure to eat junk food? (3:51)Food addiction OR life circumstances and food environment? (5:53)Sometimes your best still just isn’t good enough (7:52)I’m a defender of fast food, carbs, and ultra processed food (15:36)Junk food in “selective moderation” (15:57)Nutrition rules, self-binding, and setting boundaries (17:26)Eliminate problematic foods you can’t control from your diet (18:14)The two most accepted methods for identifying food addiction (21:15)Food addiction prevalence: 25% with overweight/obese and 11% lean individuals (27:07)Food addiction may be relatively short lived, transient, and self-correcting (31:08)Is food addiction real? Yes, but you may have to squint to see it (31:48)How do we treat food addiction? (32:20)There’s essentially no difference in how you treat someone with or without food addiction (37:08)I prefer “level of problematic eating” to the term food addiction (39:19)Chocolate, sex, nicotine, cocaine, and amphetamines (41:40)What heroin users during the Vietnam war taught us about addiction (45:00)The woman who just couldn’t stop eating McDonalds (48:12)I can’t put food addiction in the same category as other addictions (49:47)

    54 min
  5. 10/22/2025

    46: Food Judgement and Demonization is Holding Us Back

    There’s literally nothing you can eat that is universally agreed upon to be good for you.  Not even fruits and vegetables.  You can build out the old food guide pyramid with the foods that people are judging, demonizing, and vilifying with every single category: grains, fruits, vegetables, meat, and dairy.  So, what then are we supposed to eat? The basis of all fad diets is fear, avoidance, and demonization that is largely determined not by scientific evidence or superior results, rather, is based upon personal preference and rationalization/justification. In the United States we have a calories problem and there is no “superfooding”, or “nutrienting” our way out of it.  Food judgement and demonization makes some foods untouchable and off-limits but then also limits the options that we have to reduce our calories through portion control and selective moderation. Each food is a tool, a means to an end.  There are no “good” foods or “bad” foods.  Some foods are nutrient dense and fulfill our nutrient needs while others are for pure pleasure. Some of the topics in today’s episode include:  Food situations I have been judged for (0:50)Everything You Eat Will Kill You! (8:48)Clean eating perfectionist health nirvana utopia (11:03)Weight Loss: It’s Not (All) About the Food (12:48)Is It Better to Eat 5 or 15 Servings of Fruits and Vegetables? (14:15)I don’t really like eating fruits and vegetables (15:33)Everyone rationalizes and justifies what they eat (17:25)I really like clean eating, but they take it a step too far (21:12)When the benefit of clean eating wears off (22:27)I’m not a huge fan of cheat days (27:27)How Much Junk Food is Too Much Junk Food? (28:34)The basis of all fad diets: fear, avoidance, and demonization (30:33)Different purposes: there are no “good” or “bad” foods (35:05)

    49 min
  6. 10/08/2025

    45: Weight Loss: It's Not (All) About the Food

    Weight loss is the result of consuming less calories than you burn (calories in calories out).  Most weight loss diets are sold to you with the idea that some foods are “good” for you (i.e., fat and protein) while others are “bad” for you (i.e., carbs and ultra processed foods).  There is a notion that if you just stopped eating the “wrong” foods and replaced them with the “right” foods that you’ll lose weight. But what exactly are these “right” foods and “wrong” foods?  Diets focused on eliminating ultra processed foods (Paleo), eating the right macronutrients (Keto, Atkins), manipulating meal timing (alternate day fasting, time restricted feeding), and reducing hunger (Keto, high protein) aren’t any more effective than one another or their opposite counterparts.  But why is that? Maybe it’s because weight loss, despite being treated like a good food bad food math equation, isn’t actually about the food at all.  14 of 25 weight change correlations are not directly related to food, only 2 of the 9 factors associated with increased longevity are connected to food, and only 1 of 8 categories of wellbeing are associated with nutrition. In today’s episode, The Nutrition Grouch talks about exploring some of the “upstream” decisions that determine what we eat and how much of it we eat. Some of the topics in today’s episode include:  Why do we try to solve the problem with the problem? (0:26)Ultra-processed food, macros, meal timing, and hunger don’t really matter (1:25)Food has no inherent meaning, only the one you attach to it (6:28)14 of 25 weight change correlations are not about food (7:31)Only 2 of 9 longevity factors are about the food (8:36)The Blue Zones and “the Power 9” (9:09)Nutrition: only 1 part of 8 components of wellness (12:14)Like an NFL quarterback, nutrition gets too much credit and too much blame (14:39)Can you achieve wellness without good nutrition? (16:55)Can you have good wellbeing with only good nutrition? (17:41)What are a few simple questions to ask yourself to be well? (18:19)What’s enough? (20:09)Everything in “selective moderation” (21:32)What is essential? (23:46)The myth of “having it all” (24:54)Try to ignore the noise, which is almost everything (29:11)The opposite argument, weight loss IS all about the food (32:48)I’m absolutely against food warning labels (33:50)My problem with blaming ultra-processed foods (35:49)Our ancestors would have killed for our modern food environment (39:57)

    54 min
  7. 09/24/2025

    44: Do You Know Your Behavioral Obesity Risk Score (BORS)?

    In today’s episode Todd discusses the 25 things that DO MATTER for weight change and the 14 things that DO NOT seem to matter to weight change, based on his analysis of The Paper Database. He also discusses the possibility/utility of creating a weight change (loss) app called the “Behavioral Obesity Risk Score" (BORS) to help you assess your risk of becoming and/or staying obese based upon your diet, lifestyle, environment, and emotional regulation. Some of the topics in today’s episode include:  What is your Behavioral Obesity Risk Score (BORS)? (0:55)In nutrition, everything is relative (1:16)The law of diminishing returns (5:31)Breakfast eating weight gainers be damned! (8:13)Be cautious in going down the “but I’m different” rabbit hole (10:18)I despise gamification and wellness challenges, but I could do it with BORS (14:11)Things that DO MATTER for weight change (21:41) #1: Driving (21:50)#2: Emotional Eating (23:13)#3: Depression (26:00)#4: Short Sleep Duration (29:06)#5: Shift Work (30:48)#6: Evening Chronotype (31:51)#7: The Holidays (32:41)#8: Overeating Occasions/Celebrations (34:10)#9: Weekends (36:08)#10: Full Fat Dairy (37:37)#11: Soup (39:18)#12: Liquor (40:44)#13: Energy Density & Portion Size (41:30)#14: Cognitive Restraint (42:50)#15: Palatability (43:58)#16: Socioeconomic (45:55)#17: Nuts & Cereal (48:31)#18: Dieting vs. Dietary Restraint (50:04)#19: Age (51:45)#20: Early Weight Loss & Adaptive Thermogenesis (52:52)Things that DO NOT seem to MATTER for weight change (54:35) #1: The % of Macros in the Diet (ratio of carbs, fats, & protein) (54:44)#2: Diet Type (55:32)#3: Glycemic Index & the Carbohydrate/Insulin Hypothesis (55:56)#4: Small Frequent Meals (57:25)#5: Fat Burning (58:09)#6: Breakfast (59:54)#7: Nutrition Education/Food Labels (1:00:33)#8: Exercise Type (1:05:09)#9: Eating Speed (1:05:26)#10: Plate Size (1:08:40)#11: Hunger/Appetite (1:10:31)#12: Food Craving (1:11:18)#13: Stepped Care (1:11:18)#14: Marijuana Use  (1:11:18)Other Considerations: Time & Money

    1h 15m
  8. 09/10/2025

    43: The 5 Universal Laws of Weight Loss

    There are hundreds of diet types and thousands of diet do’s and diet don’ts for weight loss.  And yet, what does every diet type have in common?  The 5 Universal Laws of Weight Loss. It doesn’t matter if you eat low carb or high carb, low fat or high fat, Paleo, Keto, or alternate day fast.  Eat fat to burn fat, lift weights or run, drink water before meals, eat after 6pm, eat slowly, avoid carbs to keep your insulin low, protein and keto to suppress your appetite, or avoid ultra processed foods like the plague. All of the (oftentimes) contradictory, factoids and tidbits, hacks, tips, and tricks do not matter. Some of the topics in today’s episode include:  Weight loss advice hasn’t changed for decades, and it won’t change (2:03)A comprehensive list of all the diet interventions for weight loss (3:26)Should SNAP benefits really exclude soda? (7:51)If all diets suck the same, can I just pick the one I like? (10:51)Stay suffering in the familiar or embrace freedom and uncertainty? (12:11)The 5 Universal Laws of Weight Loss are… (15:05)#1 Meal plan to create a calorie deficit (15:25)#2 Log your food daily and self-correct as needed (19:59)How long do I have to food log for? (21:08)Food logging is really just “checking your work” (23:06)Hunger, satiety, and intuitive eating are relatively worthless in the 21st century (24:09)Food logging in real time, not daily (24:32)#3 Exercise 300 minutes a week (25:22)Will Smith, Hugh Jackman, and the jacked Cross-Fitter (28:23)Todd’s exercise history and the importance of being flexible (33:35)I’ve never regretted doing a workout (43:03)Don’t worry about doing things right or knowing what to do (44:39)#4 Weigh yourself at least once weekly (46:41)#5 Control your food environment (51:48)

    58 min

Ratings & Reviews

5
out of 5
3 Ratings

About

The weight loss industry is, has been, and always will be a dumpster fire.  People like to say health & wellness (of which weight loss is a part of) is “broken” or full of “misinformation” but that is being too generous because it implies that some of it is good or that it is actually fixable.  It is damaged beyond repair.  If it were possible, I would burn it to the ground and start over.     While it is impractical to try to summarize what’s wrong with the industry in one podcast description, my premise is this: there is a truly astronomical amount of information that neither our media nor our professionals are able to communicate to you in a meaningful way without losing all context, applicability to real life, and/or the ability to see how all of the pieces fit together.   The media should just stop covering health & wellness because their soundbites explain nothing and are little more than headlines and talking points.  They may raise awareness but not understanding, leading to the illusion of explanatory depth.  Academics actually know what they are talking about and could help educate us but are too busy with their work and only some are engaged with the public.  Most academics look down on and laugh at the quacks and zealots in the field but it’s the quacks and zealots that have the real power.   Businesses do not have the right people in place (PhDs or medical professionals) to drive product and service development (that’s left to the MBAs).  After the brand is established, the number one rule is that you must protect and promote the brand no matter how myopic, self-serving, or unimportant that brand is.  Healthcare is for the (already) sick and public health is so surface level.   When it comes to their health, the public is lazy.  They want the most entertaining, convenient, and positive information available, even if it is at the expense of achieving their goals.  Hard work, I think not.  Let me take the path of least resistance and “do it on the side”.  There’s no reason for real change.   Instead of being stuck in pedaling the news of the day, disconnected factoids and tidbits, overly reductionist, cliché, idealistic, magic cures, easy fixes, secrets, tips, tricks, hacks, fads, gimmicks, cherry-picked, binary, good/bad, flashy, insanely optimistic, exaggerated, fantasy land, sunshine and rainbows, theoretical, testimonial based weight loss information -- let’s come up with a more comprehensive, systematic, sustainable, realistic, semi-automated, results-oriented, pragmatic approach to weight loss with a slice of common sense.     I’ve spent an inordinate amount of time (years and decades) thinking about the thousands of nuances of weight loss (just Google Energy Balance Nutrition Consulting, The Paper Database, or The Science of Dieting).  I’ve also spent thousands of hours trying to understand why the health & wellness field isn’t actually science based despite the information being readily available.   I am so fed up and exhausted by it all.  It is so broken that on many days I want to say forget it.  I’m done with this.  It can’t be fixed.  I’m a smart motivated guy that can take my talents elsewhere (LeBron).  But something keeps drawing me back.  It’s like a sickness or a bad relationship.  I just can’t get out of it.  At my core, it’s who I am.  In this podcast I want to offer you truly science-based weight loss advice, critiques of the weight loss industry/diet culture, and thoughts on my experiences and failings in the profession.  And with that, I bring you The Nutrition Grouch.