This episode explores the tension many Christians feel when science, evolution, and creation are discussed together. Brandon Wallace interviews Dr. Stacy, a chemist and Catholic scholar, about how to think about evolution without panic, scientism, or false certainty. We discuss why the age of the earth is not the object of Christian faith, how Catholic thought makes room for both science and miracle, and why humility matters when reading both nature and scripture. Dr. Stacy's substack 01:52 - Forethought10:00 - Interview start 10:27 - Introducing Dr. Stacy and her work10:57 - Where to find Dr. Stacy and her writing12:15 - Dr. Stacy's journey from chemistry to Catholicism14:16 - Microevolution, macroevolution, and the faith question15:05 - Why we do not have all the pieces of the evolution puzzle16:03 - Genetics, reproduction, and change over time17:01 - Darwin, domestication, and why species are hard to define18:22 - Aristotelian and Thomistic metaphysics in Catholic thought19:47 - Why scientism feels imposing in education21:22 - Thinking historically as a Catholic22:20 - Why students crave certainty from science23:45 - Science as the study of God's handiwork25:12 - Fossils, radiometric dating, and limits of scientific certainty27:59 - Scientific consensus is not the same as final fact30:17 - Why certainty can become a trap in evolution debates31:11 - Young Earth creationism, geological exceptions, and ancient catastrophe34:14 - Radiometric dating and why half-life matters35:57 - Stable periods, Clovis culture, and change over time36:56 - Humans, Neanderthals, and the Adam and Eve question39:20 - Population models of first humans versus a miraculous beginning43:43 - Quantum mechanics, indeterminacy, and consciousness46:46 - Burial practices, symbolic thought, and human awareness50:21 - Why young Earth creationism can feel like a test of faith54:32 - Microevolution versus macroevolution in practical terms57:17 - Cilantro, receptor genes, and the limits of species definitions58:16 - Closing thanks and final remarks