Courtroom Confidential

Joshua Ritter
  • 4.8 (240)
  • True Crime
  • Weekly

Courtroom Confidential, hosted by Joshua Ritter, is your weekly rendezvous with the latest updates in headline-making criminal cases nationwide. With his background as a former L.A. County prosecutor now practicing as a criminal defense attorney, Joshua brings a unique blend of professionalism and a personal touch to the table. Join Joshua every Friday to explore the ever-developing legal landscape and gain a deeper understanding of how the legal system operates.

  1. 3d ago

    Charlie Kirk Murder Trial Set for 2028. Why the Long Wait? Plus, Lindsay Clancy Denied & Matthew Farwell Jury Deadlocked

    Jury selection in Tyler Robinson’s trial over the killing of Charlie Kirk is set for June 21, 2028. Why the long wait, and why has Judge Tony Graf reserved 105 court days? Joining from Utah, criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Joshua Ritter questions the timeline and examines the competing demands of trial preparation, a capital prosecution and the Kirk family’s wait for justice. At 11:28, Josh examines the denial of Lindsay Clancy’s motion to dismiss, the proposed investigation of the holdout juror and the Commonwealth’s gag-order request. At 20:38, he turns to Matthew Farwell’s jury reporting a deadlock, the judge’s decision to resume deliberations Tuesday and the competing evidence. This episode reflects developments as of November 9, 2026. 0:00 Cold Open: Jury Selection Set for June 2028 1:10 Welcome from Utah 2:44 Three-Case Preview 3:31 Tyler Robinson: Competing Trial Timelines 5:25 Does the Case Justify This Much Time? 6:30 Why Reserve 105 Court Days? 7:53 Preparation Time and Potential Appeals 8:41 The Kirk Family’s Response 11:28 Lindsay Clancy: Three Motions Denied 12:15 Double Jeopardy and the Mistrial Decision 13:37 Could Further Review Delay a Retrial? 14:59 Why the Judge Rejected a Juror Investigation 17:08 Why the Commonwealth’s Gag-Order Request Was Denied 19:04 Upcoming Clancy and Robinson Court Dates 19:49 Viewer Thanks 20:38 Matthew Farwell: The Jury Reports Deadlock 22:03 The Jury’s Notes and the Judge’s Response 23:27 Josh Weighs the Competing Evidence 26:06 The Prosecution’s Phone-Timeline Argument 27:42 Announcements and Schedule Changes Follow Josh: https://x.com/JoshuaRitterESQ https://www.instagram.com/joshuaritteresq/ https://www.joshuaritter.com/ https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ Follow Courtroom Confidential: https://x.com/CRConfidential https://www.facebook.com/courtroomconfidential/ https://www.instagram.com/thecourtroomconfidential/?hl=en Merch: https://shop.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ Support our moderators: https://buymeacoffee.com/courtroomconfidential DISCLAIMER: The information in this video is for educational purposes only. This content does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by watching this video. FAIR USE NOTICE: These videos might include copyrighted materials that have not been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. We are providing these materials for purposes such as criticism, commentary, education, research and news reporting, which fall under the fair use provisions of Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. #TylerRobinson #CharlieKirk #LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #TrueCrime #MatthewFarwell #SandraBirchmore Support the show

  2. 4d ago

    True Crime Q&A: Matthew Farwell, Naresh Bhatt, OJ Simpson, Lindsay Clancy and More!

    Could Matthew Farwell have been better off putting his case before a judge instead of a jury? Criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Joshua Ritter answers your Sunday Funday Q&A questions about bench trials, who must agree to them, and the federal issue at the heart of the prosecution over Sandra Birchmore’s death. Also in this episode: Naresh Bhatt’s testimony and why admitting conduct does not automatically require a guilty plea; Lindsay Clancy’s custody after a mistrial and the debate over questioning a holdout juror; courtroom evidence handling; and whether defendants must tell their lawyers the truth. Josh also shares footage from his courtroom career and answers questions about survivor privacy and true-crime coverage. 0:00 Welcome to Sunday Funday Q&A 2:19 Matthew Farwell: Why Not a Bench Trial? 9:50 Handling Courtroom Evidence Without Gloves 14:43 Mental Health, Juvenile Defendants and Accountability 20:47 Police Distrust and Online Conspiracy Theories 26:16 Naresh Bhatt: Redirect and Recalling a Witness 31:26 Josh’s Courtroom Career and Trial Footage 40:38 Viewer Feedback and Community Messages 42:00 Does True-Crime Coverage Influence Crime? 48:12 Christa Pike: The Rule 409 Question 52:48 Lindsay Clancy: Questioning the Holdout Juror 59:10 Gifted Memberships Explained 1:01:35 Sandra Birchmore: The Absence of a Note 1:06:44 Upcoming Trials and Hearings 1:12:20 O.J. Simpson: Assessing Accomplice Claims 1:21:13 Lindsay Clancy: Custody After a Mistrial 1:27:28 When Courtroom Passion Becomes Personal 1:33:14 Phil Spector: Appearance and Jury Perception 1:38:43 Idaho Four: Survivor Privacy and Online Harassment 1:44:49 Viewer Questions and Community Chat 1:47:20 Must Defendants Tell Their Lawyers the Truth? 1:50:56 Thomas Markle: Charges and Jurisdiction Questions 1:55:14 Naresh Bhatt: Why Admit Conduct Without Pleading Guilty? 1:59:21 Announcements and This Week’s Schedule Have a question for a future Sunday Funday? Leave Josh a voice message at https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ before Friday at 11:59 p.m. PT. About Joshua Ritter: Joshua Ritter is a criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor providing legal commentary and analysis on the nation’s biggest true-crime cases. Follow Josh: https://x.com/JoshuaRitterESQ https://www.instagram.com/joshuaritteresq/ https://www.joshuaritter.com/ https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ Follow Courtroom Confidential: https://x.com/CRConfidential https://www.facebook.com/courtroomconfidential/ https://www.instagram.com/thecourtroomconfidential/?hl=en Merch: https://shop.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ Support our moderators: https://buymeacoffee.com/courtroomconfidential DISCLAIMER: The information in this video is for educational purposes only. This content does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by watching this video. FAIR USE NOTICE: These videos might include copyrighted materials that have not been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. We are providing these materials for purposes such as criticism, commentary, education, research and news reporting, which fall under the fair use provisions of Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. #MatthewFarwell #SandraBirchmore #NareshBhatt #CourtroomConfidential #LindsayClancy #Idaho4 #BryanKohberger Support the show

  3. 6d ago

    Naresh Bhatt Admits Hiding Mamta’s Body. Can Jurors Believe His Explanation?

    Naresh Bhatt admits dismembering and concealing his wife Mamta Kafle Bhatt’s body, but denies killing her. Criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Joshua Ritter welcomes Paul from Reporting Live From My Sofa to examine Bhatt’s changed account, his explanation for not calling 911 and the cross-examination confronting his earlier lies. What do those admissions establish, and what must prosecutors still prove? At 36:11, Josh breaks down the closing arguments in Matthew Farwell’s federal trial over Sandra Birchmore’s death. He examines the prosecution’s motive argument, the disputed phone timeline, competing interpretations of the scene and the additional issue raised by the federal witness-tampering charge. 0:00 Cold Open: Bhatt’s Changed Account 1:04 Welcome and Show Preview 2:56 Naresh Bhatt: Paul Joins Josh 8:31 The Risks of Taking the Stand 10:50 Why Didn’t Bhatt Call 911? 16:26 What Bhatt Admitted About Concealing Mamta’s Body 17:52 Why Emphasize Where the Body Went? 21:41 Cross-Examination: Confronting the Lies 27:29 Why Listening Matters on Cross-Examination 28:16 Confronting Bhatt with Mamta’s Injury Photograph 32:26 Redirect and What Comes Next 34:01 Paul’s Upcoming Coverage 36:11 Matthew Farwell: Closing Arguments 38:40 The Prosecution’s Motive Argument 41:53 The Phone Timeline and Proof of Homicide 44:18 What Counts as Evidence of a Struggle? 46:29 The Defense’s Closing Argument 49:32 The Federal Witness-Tampering Issue 52:35 The Prosecution’s Rebuttal 54:31 Deliberations and What Comes Next 55:18 Hero of the Week 1:01:20 Announcements and Memberships 1:03:37 Sunday’s Earlier Start and Monday’s Trial Coverage Check out Paul from Reporting Live from My Sofa! YT: https://www.youtube.com/@Reportinglivefrommysofa IG: https://www.instagram.com/reportinglivefrommysofa1 About Joshua Ritter: Joshua Ritter is a criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor providing legal commentary and analysis on the nation’s biggest true-crime cases. Follow Josh: https://x.com/JoshuaRitterESQ https://www.instagram.com/joshuaritteresq/ https://www.joshuaritter.com/ https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ Follow Courtroom Confidential: https://x.com/CRConfidential https://www.facebook.com/courtroomconfidential/ https://www.instagram.com/thecourtroomconfidential/?hl=en Merch: https://shop.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ Support our moderators: https://buymeacoffee.com/courtroomconfidential DISCLAIMER: The information in this video is for educational purposes only. This content does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by watching this video. FAIR USE NOTICE: These videos might include copyrighted materials that have not been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. We are providing these materials for purposes such as criticism, commentary, education, research and news reporting, which fall under the fair use provisions of Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Support the show

  4. Nov 5

    Matthew Farwell: The Defense Rests. Did Prosecutors Prove Their Case?

    Matthew Farwell’s defense rested on November 4 without calling the former police detective to testify. Federal prosecutors allege Farwell killed Sandra Birchmore and staged her death. His defense disputes that account. Criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Joshua Ritter examines the competing expert opinions and what the forensic evidence can tell jurors about how Birchmore died. In Virginia, Naresh Bhatt took the stand in his own defense against the charge that he murdered his wife, Mamta Kafle Bhatt, whose body has never been found. How does his account compare with the evidence prosecutors presented before resting their case? About Joshua Ritter: Joshua Ritter is a criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor providing legal commentary and analysis on the nation’s biggest true-crime cases. Follow Josh: https://x.com/JoshuaRitterESQ https://www.instagram.com/joshuaritteresq/ https://www.joshuaritter.com/ https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ Follow Courtroom Confidential: https://x.com/CRConfidential https://www.facebook.com/courtroomconfidential/ https://www.instagram.com/thecourtroomconfidential/?hl=en Merch: https://shop.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ Support our moderators: https://buymeacoffee.com/courtroomconfidential DISCLAIMER: The information in this video is for educational purposes only. This content does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by watching this video. FAIR USE NOTICE: These videos might include copyrighted materials that have not been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. We are providing these materials for purposes such as criticism, commentary, education, research and news reporting, which fall under the fair use provisions of Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. #MatthewFarwell #SandraBirchmore #NareshBhatt #MamtaKafleBhatt #CourtroomConfidential Support the show

  5. Nov 3

    Lindsay Clancy: What’s Standing Between Her and a Second Trial? With Special Guests Billy Bush & Nate Eaton

    Lindsay Clancy’s November 2 hearing ended with major questions still unresolved. Criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Joshua Ritter welcomes Billy Bush, host of Hot Mics with Billy Bush, to examine the defense’s effort to prevent a retrial, the Commonwealth’s response and the dispute over questioning the holdout juror. They also discuss Kevin Reddington’s courtroom approach, juror privacy and the proposed gag order ahead of the November 16 status hearing. At 26:09, East Idaho News reporter and Courtroom Insider host Nate Eaton joins Josh after attending Lori Vallow Daybell’s Idaho Supreme Court appeal hearing. They examine the removal of attorney Mark Means, the competing arguments over conflicts of interest and why the timing of that decision matters. Nate also discusses other issues raised at the hearing and introduces his podcast, Deceived. 0:00 Cold Open: Clancy’s Holdout Juror 1:11 Welcome and Show Preview 3:03 Lindsay Clancy: Billy Bush Joins Josh 4:39 Retrial Timing and Reddington’s Courtroom Approach 8:24 Double Jeopardy: The Competing Arguments 11:53 Questioning a Holdout Without Pressuring a Verdict 14:14 Reddington, the Judge and Juror Privacy 17:25 Defense Advocacy and Public Perception 22:18 Would a Gag Order Help? 23:40 November 16 and the Unresolved Retrial Questions 25:20 Viewer Thanks and Transition 26:09 Lori Vallow Daybell: The Idaho Appeal 27:14 Nate Eaton’s Report from the Hearing 28:03 Why Mark Means Was Removed 31:33 Actual Conflict or Assumed Conflict? 34:51 The State Defends the Disqualification 36:16 Nate Eaton on Means’ Role in the Case 38:57 Other Appeal Issues and the Death-Penalty Question 41:21 Nate Eaton’s New Podcast: Deceived 44:20 Viewer Thanks 45:13 Announcements and Memberships 47:27 Upcoming Shows and Sunday’s Earlier Start Follow Billy Bush! YT: https://www.youtube.com/@HotMicswithBillyBush FB: https://www.facebook.com/hotmicswithbillybush X: https://x.com/hotmicsbilly IG: https://www.instagram.com/hotmicswithbillybush?xtok=MThtYXQzY3ZtbGlraw== Follow Nate Eaton! YT: https://www.youtube.com/@Eastidnews FB: https://www.facebook.com/NateEatonReporter X: https://x.com/NateNewsNow?lang=en IG: https://www.instagram.com/n.eaton/?hl=en Follow Josh: https://x.com/JoshuaRitterESQ https://www.instagram.com/joshuaritteresq/ https://www.joshuaritter.com/ https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ Follow Courtroom Confidential: https://x.com/CRConfidential https://www.facebook.com/courtroomconfidential/ https://www.instagram.com/thecourtroomconfidential/?hl=en Merch: https://shop.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ Support our moderators: https://buymeacoffee.com/courtroomconfidential DISCLAIMER: The information in this video is for educational purposes only. This content does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by watching this video. FAIR USE NOTICE: These videos might include copyrighted materials that have not been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. We are providing these materials for purposes such as criticism, commentary, education, research and news reporting, which fall under the fair use provisions of Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. #LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #LoriVallowDaybell #CourtroomConfidential Support the show

  6. Oct 30

    Matthew Farwell: Her Phone Went Silent. Can the Defense Explain Why? With Special Guest Randolph Rice

    Sandra Birchmore’s final recorded phone activity came minutes before Matthew Farwell left her apartment building, according to testimony discussed in this episode. What does that timeline establish, and how could the defense challenge its significance? Criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Joshua Ritter joins attorney Randolph Rice to examine the competing interpretations, William Kilroy’s testimony and the defense’s effort to raise reasonable doubt. Farwell has pleaded not guilty. Then, Josh and Randolph examine Lindsay Clancy’s latest criminal-case filings ahead of the November 2 hearing. They debate the jury notes, whether the judge should have questioned the holdout juror again, the defense’s double-jeopardy argument and the proposed gag order.  Jump to 22:44 for the Clancy discussion. 0:00 Cold Open: Matthew Farwell’s Defense 1:28 Welcome and Show Preview 3:37 The Prosecution Rests; Randolph Rice Joins Josh 4:43 Was Sandra Birchmore’s Death a Homicide? 7:27 The Phone Evidence and Surveillance Timeline 10:12 How the Defense Could Interpret the Timeline 12:38 Circumstantial Evidence and Reasonable Doubt 13:59 Search History and the Defense’s Argument 17:34 William Kilroy’s Testimony 20:36 Weighing the Evidence and Upcoming Witnesses 22:44 Lindsay Clancy: The Fight Over a Retrial 24:07 Manifest Necessity and Double Jeopardy 30:02 The Jury Notes and the Judge’s Response 33:06 Should the Holdout Juror Have Been Questioned Again? 38:31 The Defense’s Latest Filing 40:57 The Proposed Gag Order 44:41 Possible Further Review and Juror Privacy 46:50 Guest Wrap-Up 47:40 Hero of the Week: Ibro Ahmed 51:43 Announcements and Upcoming Coverage Follow Randolph Rice!  https://www.youtube.com/@ricelaw https://ricelawmd.com/attorneys/randolph-rice/ https://www.instagram.com/ricelawmd?igsi=NTc4MTIwNjQ2YQ== About Joshua Ritter: Joshua Ritter is a criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor providing legal commentary and analysis on the nation’s biggest true-crime cases. Follow Josh: https://x.com/JoshuaRitterESQ https://www.instagram.com/joshuaritteresq/ https://www.joshuaritter.com/ https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ Follow Courtroom Confidential: https://x.com/CRConfidential https://www.facebook.com/courtroomconfidential/ https://www.instagram.com/thecourtroomconfidential/?hl=en Merch: https://shop.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ Support our moderators: https://buymeacoffee.com/courtroomconfidential DISCLAIMER: The information in this video is for educational purposes only. This content does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by watching this video. FAIR USE NOTICE: These videos might include copyrighted materials that have not been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. We are providing these materials for purposes such as criticism, commentary, education, research and news reporting, which fall under the fair use provisions of Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. #MatthewFarwell #SandraBirchmore #LindsayClancy Support the show

  7. Oct 28

    Michelle Parker: Ex-Fiancé Arrested Nearly 15 Years After Mom Vanished. What Changed? With Special Guest David Mack

    Nearly 15 years after Michelle Parker vanished, what finally changed in the case against her former fiancé? Criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Joshua Ritter joins investigative reporter and Body Bags podcast co-host Dave Mack to examine the newly unsealed arrest affidavit, the disputed timeline, phone evidence and questions surrounding the original investigation. Dale Smith Jr. has pleaded not guilty to second-degree murder. Parker’s body has never been found. Then, Josh examines the latest testimony in Matthew Farwell’s federal trial over Sandra Birchmore’s death, including the medical examiner’s changed finding, William Farwell’s testimony under immunity and a strangulation expert’s interpretation of the physical evidence. What supports the prosecution’s account, and what remains contested? Jump to 31:17 for the Farwell discussion. 0:00 Cold Open: An Arrest Nearly 15 Years Later 1:24 Welcome and Show Preview 3:47 Sponsor: Zocdoc 4:51 Michelle Parker: Case Overview 6:11 Dave Mack Joins Josh 7:33 The People’s Court Connection 11:26 The Disputed Timeline and Phone Evidence 15:48 Photographed Injuries and Unanswered Questions 18:32 Prior Allegations of Domestic Violence 24:19 Missing Physical Evidence and the Waterford Text 27:28 The Vehicle, Removed Decal and Forensic Technology 31:17 Matthew Farwell: Trial Update 32:57 The Counselor’s Cross-Examination 37:26 Why the Medical Examiner Changed Her Finding 42:22 William Farwell’s Testimony 47:19 The Strangulation Expert’s Evidence 50:56 Josh’s Assessment and What Comes Next 53:59 Announcements and Upcoming Coverage Join Courtroom Confidential for a closer look at what prosecutors allege, what the evidence supports and what remains in dispute. Follow Dave Mack: https://www.youtube.com/@josephscottmorgan Follow Josh: https://x.com/JoshuaRitterESQ https://www.instagram.com/joshuaritteresq/ https://www.joshuaritter.com/ https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ Follow Courtroom Confidential: https://x.com/CRConfidential https://www.facebook.com/courtroomconfidential/ https://www.instagram.com/thecourtroomconfidential/?hl=en Merch: https://shop.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ Support our moderators: https://buymeacoffee.com/courtroomconfidential DISCLAIMER: The information in this video is for educational purposes only. This content does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by watching this video. FAIR USE NOTICE: These videos might include copyrighted materials that have not been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. We are providing these materials for purposes such as criticism, commentary, education, research and news reporting, which fall under the fair use provisions of Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. Support the show

  8. Oct 26

    Matthew Farwell, D4vd, Laura Owens, Faith Hedgepeth & More! True Crime Q&A

    True crime, legal analysis, and YOUR questions—LIVE! Criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor Joshua Ritter answers viewer questions on the biggest cases in true crime. Want to ask Josh your true crime legal question for next Sunday Funday? Get your questions in before 11:59pm PT Friday! Click the tab on the right side here: https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ Sunday Funday Playlist: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLiteA2x_mfo3H6cFS91S0tBu600tjCeFJ&si=Afeir78gpaWnjK8K Courtroom Confidential: Live Trials: https://www.youtube.com/@CCLiveTrials Become a CC Crew member: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQVmA_wratr69AQdmWtRLAw/join Give us a follow: https://www.instagram.com/joshuaritteresq/ https://x.com/JoshuaRitterESQ https://www.tiktok.com/@joshuaritteresq https://www.joshuaritter.com/ https://www.thecourtroomconfidential.com/ DISCLAIMER: The information in this video is for educational purposes only. This content does not constitute legal advice. No attorney-client relationship is established by watching this video. FAIR USE NOTICE: These videos might include copyrighted materials that have not been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. We are providing these materials for purposes such as criticism, commentary, education, research and news reporting, which fall under the fair use provisions of Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. #matthewfarwell #sandrabirchmore #d4vd #celesterivashernandez #lauraowens  #truecrime #truecrimecommunity #truecrimepodcast #legalanalysis #criminaldefense #livetrial #courtroomconfidential #evidence #selfdefense #juryselection #murder #manslaughter #faithhedgepeth Support the show

See All (525)

Hosts & Guests

4.8
out of 5
240 Ratings

About

Courtroom Confidential, hosted by Joshua Ritter, is your weekly rendezvous with the latest updates in headline-making criminal cases nationwide. With his background as a former L.A. County prosecutor now practicing as a criminal defense attorney, Joshua brings a unique blend of professionalism and a personal touch to the table. Join Joshua every Friday to explore the ever-developing legal landscape and gain a deeper understanding of how the legal system operates.

Information

  • Creator
    Joshua Ritter
  • Years Active
    2024 - 2026
  • Episodes
    525
  • Rating
    Clean
  • Copyright
    © 2026 Courtroom Confidential
  • Show Website
    Courtroom Confidential

You Might Also Like