The Danish Illusion Podcast

Flemming Blicher
  • 0.0 (0)
  • DOCUMENTARY
  • UPDATED BIWEEKLY

This podcast offers free listening to the book "The Danish Illusion" read by the author himself. This is Flemming Blicher's personal account on what actually happened from a Danish perspective during the years 2020 through 2022, when the World, first got enthralled in the corona pandemic war, and subsequently war broke out in Ukraine. thedanishillusion.substack.com

  1. JAN 10

    OMNIWAR - Interview w/ David A. Hughes

    My second interview with David A. Hughes I have previously interviewed David on the highly relevant topic of “Technocracy”. Although the first interview lasted more than an hour, I didn’t feel that we had exhausted the subject and David’s vast knowledge of Technocracy, Omniwar, and the world situation in general. That’s why I arranged this second interview, which I think is even better than the first, as David really lets off steam, in his own gentlemanly British way, of course. Download David’s book for free! I cannot praise his first book ““Covid-19,” Psychological Operations, and the War for Technocracy” enough, and I encourage everybody to download it for free and read it, or even print it (yes, you can do that legally and for free!). Did you miss the first interview? It is right here on the below link… Coming up… I want to interview David about the subject of his book “Wall Street, the Nazis, and the Crimes of the Deep State.” Many people do not realize how closely connected the oligarchic elites on Wall Street and world events such as Hitler’s and nazism’s rise to power really are. Get full access to The Danish Illusion at thedanishillusion.substack.com/subscribe

    1h 18m

  2. 12/02/2025

    TECHNOCRACY - Interview w/ David A. Hughes

    An Academic’s take on the World David A. Hughes has no less than two Ph.d’s (German and International Relations [IR]) and has worked for a handful of universities. He started looking into 9/11 at the end of 2016 which eventually led him to later leave the cosy university life at the Lincoln University in the Eastern part of UK. The Three Camps of Awareness David has invented a framework he has dubbed “The Three Camps of Awareness” It is a neat framwork to understand two things: * How one’s understanding of the true state of the World evolves over three levels. * How immense counterinsurgency infiltration in reality is. Camp 1: The unawake state where you listen to radio, TV, politicians, etc. to get your news of the World, uanware of any conspiracies against the populace. Camp 2: When you become aware to the fact that the narrative pushed by schools, academia, medias and politicians are twisted and sometimes entirely fake, you also become susceptible to a range of alternative inputs, which might not al of them lead you to enlightenment of the truth. In Camp 2 the counterinsurgency agents are particularly eager in trying to scoop you into (the CIA-dubbed) limited hangouts. An example of such actors are Del Bigtree (The Highwire), Meryl Nash (Children’s Health Defense) and Jimmy Dore (Jimmy Dore Show), which I myself called out one and a half year ago, after participating in a rally in Geneva for the WHO’s 77th World Health Assembly (see link and link). The rally were in my oppinion infested with counterinsurgency agents and proponents of different limited hangouts. Camp 3: When you have done your own extensive research and can see the difference between the real truths and the (often astroturfed) faked or half truths. In camp 3 you are immune to counterinsurgency agents and trolls. The role of the Tavistock Institute and the CIA Amongst other important subjects David explain in details in his first book “Covid-19,” Psychological Operations, and the War for Technocracy, Volume 1. - and with tonnes of links and references - just how covert institutions like Tavistock Institute and the CIA fits into the conspiracy against the populace. And you can even download it for free on below link: Download his book for free It is impossible for me to exaggerate the value of David’s book “Covid-19,” Psychological Operations, and the War for Technocracy, Volume 1. During the interview David mentions his paper on 9/11, which is available on Lincoln Universtity’s homepage on the link below: * 9/11 Truth and the Silence of the IR Discipline Please do support David A. Hughes I highly recommend you to sign up for David’s Substack newsletter and to support his work. There is a wealth of information on his Substack landing page, as he is doing a lot of interviews with various alternative platforms. Get full access to The Danish Illusion at thedanishillusion.substack.com/subscribe

    1h 15m

  3. 08/15/2025

    #20 - Year 2021 – But the Emperor has no Clothes!

    The Story about the little Boy and the Emperor with no Clothes on! The little boy who is the only one brave enough to say out loud that the emperor has no clothes is a good analogy for how fascism works. The king steals from the people through taxes and duties and distributes some of this wealth to the private sector, which in turn helps him keep the people in check. Early in 2020, a great deal of documentation emerged showing that the WHO and the vaccine industry were using dirty tricks, that politicians and the press around the world were behaving in a strangely coordinated and uniform manner, that face masks were largely ineffective against viruses, and that the COVID-19 tests were inaccurate and were in fact the reason why infection numbers were being artificially inflated. So, by the beginning of 2021, the average critically thinking Dane already had access to the necessary information and documentation to see through our government's exploitation of the coronavirus situation to gain more power through hastily passed laws. Nevertheless, the madness continued, and 2021 was marked by the coronavirus from the outset. I had been involved in organizing demonstrations in front of the Danish Parliament, Christiansborg since the summer of 2020, and on November 13, 2020, as mentioned earlier, around 6-7,000 people gathered in front of Christiansborg, where politicians gave in to public pressure and rejected the epidemic law. Even the Social Democrats did not vote for their own proposal for a new epidemic law. It turned out that the health policy situation worsened further in 2021, and as demonstrated in the previous chapter, this happened in the most vulgar possible way. Parliament Act 150 - Danes as guinea pigs In January 2021, the Ministry of Health requested DKK 48.5 million from the Danish Parliament's Finance Committee for a research project to conduct a national clinical study on the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines. The request is set out in the document entitled “Aktstykke 150”, or in English “Parliament Act No. 150”. At that time, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) had granted conditional marketing authorization for Pfizer-BioNTech's and Moderna's mRNA vaccines. Another approval was on the way for AstraZeneca's rDNA vaccine, which was also approved shortly thereafter on the same terms as the mRNA vaccines, but AstraZeneca's vaccine was later withdrawn from the market in Denmark. Although this so-called vaccine was quickly withdrawn from the market, it still accounts for a relatively large proportion of the reported suspected side effects from COVID-19 vaccines in Denmark. Parliament Act 150 literally shows what a huge gamble was taken with the launch of COVID-19 vaccines around the turn of the year 2020/2021. There was simply a lack of basic knowledge about the vaccines, and the scandalous conditional marketing approval is in a category all its own: a huge medical experiment in which the entire Danish population participated as guinea pigs! Here are some excerpts from the four-page document, Parliament Act 150: “The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has provisionally granted conditional marketing authorization for two newly developed vaccines against COVID-19: BioNTech/Pfizer's vaccine and Moderna's vaccine.” “It is further expected that AstraZeneca's vaccine will receive conditional approval on January 29 and that additional vaccines may be approved and used in the first half of 2021.” “Denmark has begun vaccinating against COVID-19.” “However, knowledge about the effectiveness of the various vaccines in terms of, among other things, the degree of immunity and the time horizon for immunity is limited.” “The COVID-19 vaccines are being approved by the EMA based on clinical studies in which the vaccines’ effectiveness and side effects have been monitored for a period of approximately two months after the second injection of the vaccine.” “The EMA has assessed that the documentation for the two vaccines is sufficient for conditional approval.” “The long-term efficacy of the vaccines is unknown.” “Based on the clinical trials that form the basis for the approval of the approved vaccines, there is only evidence that the purchased vaccines provide immunity for two to three months, as this is the duration of the large clinical trials.” “The expectation is that the immunity will last for a longer period, but this has not yet been proven.” “Several of the new vaccines are based on new technologies – these new technologies have not previously been approved and widely used in the population. The long-term effects can be monitored in a study such as the one proposed.” “The Danish Medicines Agency, the Danish Health Authority, and the Statens Serum Institut assess that the proposed study is the only real opportunity to monitor whether the vaccines work as intended.” I hope that the above excerpt from Act 150 gives the reader an impression of what was happening at that time in Danish history: the government, with the support of the Folketing, had turned the entire Danish population into guinea pigs in a huge medical and biological experiment. If you would like to read the full text of document no. 150, you can find it on the Danish Parliament's website as a permanent reminder and warning (however, I had to confirm three times that I was human before I was granted access to the document when I last tried). (1) Away with the Constitution and bring on the Epidemic Act! Do the government and parliament have the power to mislead the population and get away with disregarding the Constitution? The answer is both yes and no. Yes, because that is precisely what happened with the two epidemic laws passed in 2020 and 2021. The full text of both of these epidemic laws can be found on Retsinformation. But I would also argue that the answer is no, because according to the Constitution, it is the royal family that formally holds power, and the regent who presides over the Council of State. No new laws can come into force without the signature of the sitting regent and a sitting minister. However, it is the prime minister who is the visible part of the more invisible power structure, which very few Danes are interested in. The prime minister is merely a puppet figure, tightly controlled by what we might euphemistically call ‘the establishment’, ‘the shadow state’ or ‘the deep state’. In the next chapter, I will return to Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen, who formed a new government in December 2022 after a month and a half of negotiations as the appointed royal investigator. But let's just focus on the Epidemic Act for now. It is typically the ministers responsible for the various areas of government who propose the bills that are later passed and, I would argue, in many cases violate the Constitution. Former Health Minister Magnus Heunicke was just such a minister, who in less than 12 months put forward no less than two epidemic law bills that violate the Constitution. For obvious reasons, Magnus Heunicke only served as health minister by the grace of the prime minister, or the royal family, if you will. The most remarkable thing is that Magnus Heunicke got away with it, almost without any of the many official political commentators saying anything about a referendum. The few who do mention it are not given any airtime in the media. This is an interesting fact that is truly astonishing and should raise the eyebrow of any Dane who thinks he or she lives in a democratic state! But it only becomes really interesting when such an epidemic law proposal is passed through first two of three parliamentary debates by an almost unanimous parliament. Still not a word about the violation of the Constitution and/or a referendum. Or almost not. Because I participated as both organizer and co-organizer of the many demonstrations that undoubtedly contributed to the fact that not even the Social Democrats voted for their own bill on a new epidemic law on November 13, 2020. On that day, the epidemic bill fell during its third proceeding in the Parliament, as no one voted for it. Not even the Social Democrats who had proposed it! (2) I would like to take this opportunity to send a special, warm and appreciative greeting to each and every one of the freedom fighters who demonstrated against the Epidemic Act in 2020, and especially to the 7,000 people who, on November 13, 2020, were able to celebrate one of the only real victories that this freedom struggle has been able to offer during the coronavirus pandemic. I have no doubt that this brave group will all be part of the story of Denmark's future when we have broken free from the iron grip of global fascism. There will come a day in the future when the question will be: Where were you, Grandma/Grandpa, when global fascism had to be fought back in the 2020s? Unfortunately, the large group of government coronavirus critics was completely divided between the great victory on November 13, 2020, and February 27, 2021. As a result, the demonstrations that took place in January and February 2021 were more sporadic and fragmented, giving politicians more peace and quiet to carry out their unconstitutional work. I have described he division that arose in the coronavirus critic community in my Danish book “Illusionen om Danmark - Del 1 - De 3 Tabte År” (not yet translated into english), but now I will finish commenting on the criminality that I believe has taken place in connection with this Epidemic Act. (3) Human rights and the Epidemic Act It does not require a basic education to see that the current Danish epidemic law disregards the basic human rights of the people and renders elements of the Constitution inoperative. Of particular relevance are personal freedom under Section 71 of the Constitution, the protection of the home under Section 72, and the right of assembly under Section 79. The correct legal name for the curr

    43 min

  4. 07/29/2025

    #19 - Hooray, the vaccines are coming

    Hail Caesar, the vaccines are coming “Today I got my first vaccine. Thank you to all of you who help us on our way to a normal everyday life again.” Crown prince Frederik (now kin Frederik 10.) That vaccines would be the decisive factor in saving the world from the deadly coronavirus pandemic was not a surprise in 2020. At least not to those who had done their homework. Remember, this scenario was practiced at Event 201 in New York in October 2019, where vaccines were ultimately at stake. The U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) approved Pfizer BioNTech's so-called COVID-19 vaccine for emergency use on December 11, 2020. This was exactly 9 months after the WHO declared a pandemic. (1) Another 8 months later, on August 23, 2021, the FDA issues a press release stating that they have finally approved Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine. (2) The FDA's Danish counterpart is the Danish Medicines Agency, which is the Danish authority that approves medicines on the Danish market. The Danish Medicines Agency is a body under the Ministry of Health, or the Ministry of the Interior and Health, as it has been renamed after the formation of the government on December 15, 2022. In November 2018, the Danish Medicines Agency was assessed and approved by the FDA so that Denmark, along with a handful of other European countries, could join the mutual inspection agreement that formally entered into force between the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the FDA already in 2017. This means that if the FDA approves a vaccine, the Danish Medicines Agency does not have to approve it, and vice versa. The benefits are many, especially for pharmaceutical companies, who only need to deploy their lobbyists to fight for approval of a drug in one country and the approval is valid for all countries covered by the agreement. (3) This is also the case with COVID-19 vaccines. Once they are approved by the FDA, it is a matter of course that the EMA and the Danish Medicines Agency also approve them. The Danish Medicines Agency summarizes the ‘facts’ about mRNA technology on their website, where they mention both the mRNA (Pfizer and Moderna) and rDNA (Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca) COVID-19 vaccines: “These technologies were both fully developed before the COVID-19 pandemic hit, but have not previously been used in approved vaccines”. Furthermore, the Danish Medicines Agency writes: “One of the great advantages of mRNA technology is that you can very quickly update vaccines for new corona variants without having to develop a completely new vaccine from scratch”. As an ordinary Dane reading the Danish Medicines Agency's summary of mRNA technology, you might not realize that the technology was only just being developed, which was also the reason why there was no need to wait several years before the new corona vaccines could be approved. Read the Danish Medicines Agency's information about the so-called vaccines against COVID-19 if you are interested in exactly what kind of materials the majority of the Danish population has had injected into their bodies. (4) On Sunday, December 27, the first Danes were vaccinated with a dose of Pfizer's so-called vaccine to prevent COVID-19 disease, a disease that can allegedly occur after infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. While it normally takes 10-20 years to develop a vaccine against a disease, it took less than a year in the case of vaccines against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. In fact, it took less than a few days from having the RNA material of the virus to having a vaccine ready. According to Pfizer, Moderna, the FDA, the EMA, the Danish Medicines Agency, Bill Gates, the WHO and all the others who claim to care about the health of the entire world's population, they had the mRNA technology in place to make a vaccine against the coronavirus when the pandemic was declared by the WHO on March 11, 2020. And they had also practiced via Event 201 how to crack down on the so-called ‘misinformation’ about the vaccines from vaccine skeptics around the world. Even before the vaccines were ready. 2020 was a hectic year in which the world's authorities had the opportunity to show their worst side. In that respect, 2021 would prove to be even worse! The Danish Illusion is a reader supported publication. If you do not feel like becoming a paid monthly subscriber, but want to support my work, you can buy me a cup of coffee for aprrox. 5 USD/35 DKK(click HERE!): Links: * On December 11, 2020, the FDA announced that it has approved Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine for emergency use: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-takes-key-action-fight-against-covid-19-issuing-emergency-use-authorization-first-covid-19 * On September 23, 2021, the FDA announces final approval of Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-covid-19-vaccine * Inspection agreement signed in November 2018 between the Danish Medicines Agency and the FDA: https://laegemiddelstyrelsen.dk/da/nyheder/2018/danmark-omfattet-af-inspektionsaftale-mellem-eu-og-usa/ * The Danish Medicines Agency's general information on COVID-19 vaccines (January 2023):https://laegemiddelstyrelsen.dk/da/nyheder/temaer/Generelt-om-vacciner-mod-COVID-19/ Get full access to The Danish Illusion at thedanishillusion.substack.com/subscribe

    6 min

  5. 07/18/2025

    #18 - From engineer to an honest job as a bin man

    The biggest money laundering scandal in history At the time of writing, I have gone from having worked as a support engineer, department manager, sales engineer, project manager and management consultant to now having a job as a refuse collector, or bin man, as most people would probably call it. The garbage collector job is the only full-time job I've been offered for more than three years, despite having applied for hundreds of positions. The explanation is probably that a waste management company does not consider it a major obstacle that a Google search of my name reveals that it could look like I'm a person who attacks nurses and on top is also a corona sceptic. Because that's what you can read about me by doing a simple Google search. However, I will say that I'm happy to have a job where I do honest work, unlike some of the jobs I've held over the years. Take my last job, for example, where my engineering and MBA degrees and relatively long CV meant that I was a salaried employee, holding meetings and typing things into a computer. I was employed as a kind of project manager on a limited 1-year contract in the company Reckitt Benckiser at the Nordic headquarters in Gladsaxe in Copenhagen. The project was to split the company into two legally separate entities - one for their pharmaceutical products (RB Nordic Health A/S) and one for their household products (RB Nordic Hygiene A/S). At the time, the company had a turnover of around a quarter of a billion Danish kroner (DKK) but paid almost no tax locally in Denmark. This fact I only got interested in some time after I was hired. Initially, I was just proud to have landed a job for DKK 55,000 per month, my first higher-paying job after a long period of suffering from the after-effects of a period of stress. I went down with stress in 2017, when my then employer TACK International fired me after 3 days of stress illness. Boom, off you go! This is the behaviour of a consulting company whose core business is to train other companies' employees and managers. One of the reasons I went down with stress was that our consultant in Jutland had just gone down with stress, so I was asked to take our customers in Jutland with the result that I was commuting to Jutland every week with very long working days. It took me some time to recover from the stress illness, so it was very satisfying to land the job at Reckitt-Benckiser in October 2018. At some point during my project employment at Reckitt Benckiser, I became aware that the company had settled a major lawsuit that is part of the opioid scandal that has particularly ravaged the US. Opioid is the name of the painkiller products that companies like Reckitt-Benkiser sold on the US market. The whole court case was ended internally by Reckitt Benckiser's CEO sending out an announcement to all employees that the company had reached a agreement with the US government to pay a settlement of USD 1.4 billion in a case of illegal marketing of a pharmaceutical product. The CEO makes it clear to all employees that no Reckitt Benckiser employees have done anything wrong, but that the settlement is being made to “protect its shareholders”. The paradox is that despite the settlement costing the company 1.4 billion US dollars, no employees were penalised, except for the internal whistleblower who started the case and who has long since had to leave the company! You can read about the settlement on the US Department of Justice website. [1] When I found out I was quite shocked to work for a company that circumvented ethics and laws in such a cavalier manner. At the coffee machine, and during other one-on-one meetings with my colleagues, I tried to articulate that my integrity was affected by working in such a place. But as a project employee, I probably had less at stake than the permanent employees. In any case, I was very surprised to find that none of my colleagues were disgusted by the settlement and the way the case was closed by the company's CEO. It's worth noting that while such cases of illegal marketing of pharmaceutical products are not entirely uncommon in the US, it is one of the larger cases. Equally relevant in the post-corona “voluntary” vaccine shutdowns, it's worth noting that Pfizer is the company that appears to have committed the biggest illegality in the field, settling an illegal marketing case in 2009 for the astronomical sum of 2.3 billion US dollars. This is the same company that in 2021 and beyond has made billions and billions from the corona pandemic. The case from 2009 can also be read about on the American Department of Justice's website, which refers to the case as the biggest fraud in history. [2] Less than six months after Reckitt Benckiser's settlement, I was again shocked by a settlement reached in US litigation. The telecoms giant Ericsson, for whom I had previously worked in the Middle East, reached a similar settlement in December 2019 with the same Department of Justice as Reckitt Benckiser had done. However, in Ericsson’s case the opioid scandal had been replaced by a corruption scandal that involved a range of countries across continents. This time, however, the settlement amount was slightly lower, just over 1 billion US dollars, and this case can also be found on the Department of Justice website. [3] Ericsson had apparently been involved in corruption cases in Egypt, China, Djibouti, Indonesia, Vietnam and Kuwait and had been forced to settle for over a billion US dollars. How many employees were fired from Ericsson because of this corruption scandal? You guessed it: None! And while we're on the subject of international corporate crime, let's turn to Denmark’s number one bank in size and local familiarity: No Danske Bank employees lost their jobs as a result of the biggest money laundering case in World history? That's right, again: None! I remember a journalist asking an “expert” that very question and the answer was a big resounding “zero” with the explanation that the employees had probably already disappeared and were now working for other banks or other companies. The Danske Bank money laundering case has been labelled the biggest scandal in European history by the British newspaper The Guardian. Wikipedia calls it the possibly biggest money laundering scandal ever recorded. [4] At the end of 2019, I told one of my best friends who had helped me through the aftermath of my stress illness that I would never again work as a salaried employee for an international company. He just shrugged his shoulders in resignation, probably thinking that the last bit of sanity had left me, that the goal must be full and that I was unlikely to ever get back on my feet. I don't know if he was thinking exactly like that, because we don't talk anymore, we disagree on too many things, and it's probably mainly me who has moved significantly in my opinions and sympathies since we got to know each other many years ago. But I am extremely grateful to him for all the help and support he gave me during a difficult time. Now, you might sit and wonder: How come Ericsson had to pay 1 billion USD to the American Federal State in a settlement over corruption done in Egypt, China, Djibouti, Indonesia, Vietnam and Kuwait? And/or why Reckitt Benckiser had to pay 1,4 billion USD to the American Federal State over cheating the Americans on the street to buy their painkillers under false pretensions? And, in particular, why Danske Bank had to pay a settlement to the American Federal State over criminal money laundering done in Estonia? My views on international companies and the laws and regulations under which they operate have made me very cynical about international trade and globalism. I believe that the market economy capitalist system as we know it has failed miserably. I don't want to just turn my thumb down on free market forces and capitalism, because the implementation we have today is something completely different from that: There exist no ‘free market forces’ as it is all controlled by a very small banking elite. I will return to this strongly in the section on the economic fiction in the sequel to this book, which is a book I have written with two other authors and which is called ‘The 3 Fictions’. Links: * On 11 July 2019, Reckitt Benkiser settles with the Department of Justice regarding an opioid product: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-obtains-14-billion-reckitt-benckiser-group-largest-recovery-case * Pfizer's settlement is described by the Department of Justice as the largest fraud case in history: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-announces-largest-health-care-fraud-settlement-its-history * On 6 December 2019, Ericsson settles with the Department of Justice regarding corruption: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/ericsson-agrees-pay-over-1-billion-resolve-fcpa-case * In September 2018, The Guardian called the Danske Bank money laundering scandal the biggest in Europe: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/sep/20/danske-bank-money-laundering-is-biggest-scandal-in-europe-european-commission The Danish Illusion is a reader supported publication. If you do not feel like becoming a paid monthly subscriber, but want to support my work, you can buy me a cup of coffee for aprrox. 5 USD/35 DKK(click HERE!): Get full access to The Danish Illusion at thedanishillusion.substack.com/subscribe

    11 min

  6. 07/06/2025

    #17 - Dancing Nurses and harassment accusations

    Dancing nurses In 2020, dancing nurses would suddenly become a worldwide phenomenon, taking over the front pages of newspapers and going viral on social media. In October 2020, the Philippine media Philippine Star did a report on dancing nurses and the support that all healthcare workers on the frontline of the pandemic receive from the population. The video from the Philippines is just one of many posted on various media outlets in 2020. It was part of a trend that started in April 2020, when videos of nurses dancing with masks on began to proliferate just a month after the pandemic was declared by the WHO. The videos were supposedly meant to inspire courage and joy during a difficult time of the pandemic. But in the coronavirus sceptic community, it caused outrage because at the same time, there were videos of empty hospitals where coronavirus patients were allegedly hospitalised and, in some cases, dying. It is important to point out that, as far as I know, there is hardly a single corona sceptic who does not admit that a flu disease, such as COVID-19 and other flu viruses, can kill a person and that there are indeed people who have died from what they contracted during the corona pandemic. But these same people are also very aware that there is a huge difference between “dying from corona” and “dying with corona”. As it turned out, nurses and other frontline staff, i.e. paramedics and hospital staff around the world, had time in the midst of the tough fight against corona to act in videos where they performed choreographed dances. And the videos were supposed to “boost morale” according to the narrative accompanying them. I was very disgusted by the dancing nurse videos and very sceptical of doctors and nurses who just followed the narrative and encouraged face masks, hand sanitiser and distance without examining whether it made sense for the population in terms of health. Therefore, I was the author of some disclaimers intended to inform healthcare professionals, doctors and nurses, among others, that there were a number of scientific studies that did not support the government's corona policy. Philippine Star produced YouTube video about dancing nurses and public support: Compilation video on Bitchute of dancing nurses recorded all over the world: https://www.bitchute.com/video/YdK5WkaCeM2j/ Alleged threat to a nurse On Tuesday 22 December 2020, I was arrested by the police at my address in Emdrup in the middle of a live Zoom meeting I was hosting. The participants in the Zoom meeting watch as two police officers pick me up at my home at 8.30pm a few days before Christmas. The other day I forwarded someone else's Facebook post about a nurse speaking out about the corona situation, which is why I was suddenly treated like a common criminal who deserved no better than to be arrested at my home and taken into custody. I was asked to squat naked and cough so that the police officers could be sure that I didn't have any drugs on me. I was interrogated and later charged and indicted by the Copenhagen City Court for harassing and offending a nurse in the performance of her duties. Although I was acquitted in February 2021, the damage has been done to my public image, if I had one. If you do a Google search for ‘Flemming Blicher’, you will find two articles in the top ten search results that mention me as guilty before the case has even been heard in court. The very same day I was arrested, BT wrote their article about the case, which promised, among other things, that the then Minister for Health and the Elderly, Magnus Heunicke, would intervene in the case. To my knowledge, he never did. But there is no doubt what the vast majority of Danes are led to believe about me when they read such an article. A minister wants to get involved in the case, and I am referred to as having been convicted long before my case even goes to court. The Danish Nurses' Council (DSR) writes a very unflattering article about me allegedly threatening a nurse who spoke out about the corona situation. The main theme of the article is that the nurse is suffering psychologically from the attack I allegedly directed at her. As you can read from the article, in my comment and forwarding of the original post, I wrote the following: "I completely agree with Facebook user X. We need to get hold of the doctors and nurses who continue to hold hands over government and narrative. They MUST be held accountable! Better now than later. Help track down Named Nurse Y and hold her accountable for contributing to this fear-mongering and ask her for proof." As I discussed in a previous section, my focus at this point in 2020 was to hold accountable the people who contributed the most to scaring the population. Accountability was done by sending them an Accountability Notice. Shortly after the DSR article was published, it appeared at the very top of Google searches for my name, and has done so ever since. Follow THIS LINK to go the DSR article (in Danish). So if the average Dane comes across my name and wants to know a little more about who I am, one of the first things they find out is that I allegedly threatened a nurse while doing her job. There are also other articles at the top of the search results that link me to being at odds with the authorities. In a way, it is to be expected that I, as a key participant in the activism against the government's corona policy, am investigated and criticised by the media. However, I'm surprised that there isn't more interest among the many different newspapers, magazines and other media outlets to write about things from my point of view or that of corona activism in general? There is a little superficial writing here and there, but as a rule, there is a great distance between the journalist writing the article and myself. The same is true in the vast majority of other cases when someone from the corona activist community is interviewed. As if we are citizens without the same rights as “ordinary” citizens, or as if we are just different and should therefore be treated differently. As if we are against democracy and should therefore not be granted any democratic rights. The reality is that we want a people's government, which is the same as democracy. Democracy is derived from Greek and means the rule of the people, which is exactly what we are fighting for and which we believe we don't really have in Denmark at the moment. It is my opinion that politicians are not interested in the people's opinion but would rather explain to the people what we should think about corona, for example. The underlying theme is that politicians and their carefully selected experts will tell the people what to think. For example, since 2020, many millions of tax dollars have been spent on a media like TjekDet, which is designed to shame and reprimand a dissident like me, while politicians' lies are only rarely brought up. The case with the nurse ended with me getting a clean acquittal, but as I mentioned, the damage was already done. It doesn't really matter whether I was convicted or acquitted, because the article is online and that's where it stays. I've spoken to DSR and they won't take it down, but they said that they would instead write a new article about my acquittal, which they have done. The article about the acquittal is quite hard to find and there is no reference to it at the bottom of the old, defamatory article. Follow THIS LINK to go to the follow-up article, which is not even linked to in the original article (also in Danish) The fact that I'm only talking about holding the nurse accountable by sending her a NoL, just like all the other doctors, nurses and government officials who help perpetuate the government's fear narrative, the mainstream media apparently has no interest in exploring in depth. This is how you contribute to the miscarriage of justice of an acquitted man. It's scary that it works that way in Denmark, but I'm no longer as surprised by this kind of thing as I was in 2020 and 2021. I've seen far too many examples of these fascist traits of official Denmark for me to think it's coincidence. The Danish Illusion is a reader supported publication. If you do not feel like becoming a paid monthly subscriber, but want to support my work, you can buy me a cup of coffee for aprrox. 5 USD/35 DKK(click HERE!): Get full access to The Danish Illusion at thedanishillusion.substack.com/subscribe

    10 min

  7. 06/22/2025

    #16 - Inpower Movement, Notice of Liability and Liability Claims

    Notice of Liability and Liability Claims At the beginning of 2020 I experienced a sudden awakening to reality in relation to corruption in our world and inside Danish politics, whether this was a minister, an authority or an NGO, as well as international politics; EU, UN, WHO, WEF, etc.. I decided to take part in doing something about it. Firstly, I wanted to help expose the deceit and secondly I wanted to find solutions. As an engineer, I am trained in and have a good knowledge of the area of electronics and radio waves, and I have, as previously mentioned, worked for six years for the world's largest telecom company Ericsson. I therefore assumed that my contribution would be within my area of expertise. If you do not know what a smart meter is, then your house has, with 99% certainty, already had one installed, as these new socalled smart meters replace the analogue rotating disc power meters that measure the electricity consumption in a household. During my time as an activist in relation to electromagnetic radiation from smart phones, smart meters and 5G, I encountered an organisation which was trying to help the people solve the problem related to electromagnetic radiation (EMR). This organisation was the Inpower Movement. The film-maker Josh del Sol has made an award-winning documentary about Inpowers activities, which is centered around a Notice of Liability (NoL), that are making the perpetrating people in power, and their mindless minions, responsible in a legal way for their crimes against the common people. …Notice of Liability (NoL), that are making the perpetrating people in power, and their mindless minions, responsible in a legal way for their crimes against the common people. Inspired by Josh Del Sol's video and the founder of the Inpower Movement, Cal Washington, plus in particular two Danish sovereign advocates, I created an NoL in Danish which, in September 2020, was sent to all the members of the Danish parliament. This was done with the help from a lot of people, who also made donations making it possible to send the 170 ‘signed for’ letters with the NoLs to each individual politician. At the time I was collaborating with an organisation called Denmark Awakes (Danmark Vågner), which was headed by a certain Jette Toft. On their website you can view the names of all the members of the Danish parliament and mayors in Denmark, who have all received the NoL, and who has all signed for receiving the NoL by post, as the NoL has to be sent by recommended post, at least that is how we do it in Denmark. This was important in order to make them culpably responsible for putting smart meters in peoples homes and permitting the rollout of the 5G technology in Denmark. Included with the NoL they also received sufficient knowledge and information about smart meters and 5G to garner an understanding that the technology used in both instances is a crime against humanity. The NoL is quite a thorough document that makes the receiver of it commit to a self-executing contract. It is a legal jiu-jitsu way of handling the criminalities done by the people in power towards the common people. It is essentially a legal action done in total self-defence. Even so, the receiver of the NoL always ends up with large bills often amounting to hundreds of thousands to millions of US dollars that the receiver owes the sender of the NoL bill. When a point is reached when people will no longer suffer damage and abuse by the people in power, all the receivers of NoL - for instance a lot of politicians and government officials and other civil servants - will no longer be able to claim that they had not been aware that there was a problem so that they can’t claim ignorance. I strongly encourage you to join the Inpower team in your country and start sending NoLs to the perpetrators there. If Inpower has not yet established a presence in your country then I recommend that you contact Inpower and offer your help in setting up Inpower in your country, just like I participated in setting up Inpowers Danish organisation and in finishing the Danish version of the NoL. The NoL itself will make sure that a large part of the most evil and inhuman people in power - those who participate in invoking totalitarian measures on the people - will feel their consequences of their criminal actions. The NoL has been developed into a very comprehensive document that is near to impossible to neglect by the receiver. As the sender have proof through the post services registering of receipt, the sender of the NoL can always prove that the receiver did indeed receive the NoL. That is important as that makes it easy to establish that the perpetrators were made aware of the perpetrating actions they have participated in, and thereby have been made responsible for their cruel deeds. I am of course hoping, along with thousands of other representatives from the common people, that the perpetrators one day will be charged for their atrocities. When that day comes, the NoL is possibly the best legal evidence lying ready at hand for possible legal action. It is a tad bit ironic for me that I have learned so much from the Inpower Movement, but the knowledge I gained also have had the consequence that I no longer spent so much of my energy on the activism related to 5G and EMR. I still get contacted by people who want different forms of advice and help with smart meters, electromagnetic radiation and 5G towers. Cal Washington and his Inpower Movement opened my eyes to how extensive the deceit that the world's power elite are pushing on the people. Consequently I found it necessary that I gave my 5G activism a break. I felt I had to make a decision in relation to the use of my limited resources where they would have the most impact. The challenge to persuade the Danish population and the authorities that 5G is dangerous seemed many times greater than the challenge of exposing the deceit relating to the corona virus. So this is why I decided towards the end of 2020 to turn my focus from the 5G and EMR activism to a wider political perspective. I then also became convinced that the corona hoax and the lack of safety in relation to 5G and EMR were inseparably connected. This is also why Inpower Movement have created a NoL for three different areas: Smart Meter (Trespassing Technology), 5G and Vaccines. Even a fourth NoL is on the way dealing with geoengineering/chemtrails. In the autumn of 2020 I copied the thinking behind Inpowers NoL to use some of the same tactics to a more basic local Danish liability claim regarding the 5G roll-out, a much lighter document than Inpowers NoL. The aim was to apply immediate liability to participants in the state sponsored terrorising of the Danes. By omitting any financial implications (as is the case with Inpower Movements NoL) on the perpetrators, it becomes a lot easier, cheaper and less time consuming to send the liability claim to a wide range of perpetrators. Even without the financial implications it is merely a document that makes sure the receiver cannot claim that they were not aware of the bad decisions they have undertaken whilst participating in the overreach of power. Amongst the receivers of the Danish liability claim are ninety-eight mayors in all the local council districts of Denmark. Along with these mayors all the participating politicians and key civil servants of the Danish government have likewise received a liability claim making a lot of substantial legal evidences ready for a hopefully future legal showdown. In such a case none of the perpetrators are able to say that they did not know what they had participated in. The Danish liability claim helps declare that these criminals can be held responsible, and that we know that they are now informed so they also explicitly know that what they are doing is causing harm to other human beings. So when for instance a minister of health receives our Danish liability claim he or she will have a greater motivation to refrain from further criminal actions and from participating in the corona hoax at large. Indeed, the NoL’s and liability claims do promote the expression ‘they can run, or ignore, but they can’t hide.’ Besides, it will be so much easier to convict the guilty in the arising court cases as ignorance cannot be claimed. As a reminder, to claim ignorance was exactly what the supporters of the Nazis did when the Germans had capitulated after the second world war. Almost an entire nation - directly or indirectly - supported the German National Socialist Party and the party leader Adolf Hitler. However, after the war many Germans claimed that they had not supported Nazism nor Hitler and that they were ignorant of the horrors in the concentration camps. If NoL’s and liability had been known at the time, they could have been sent to all who took part and they would have been liable and not able to claim ignorance and they would have had a higher chance of being convicted then. As we know from the proceedings in Nuremberg only a handful of Nazis were convicted for their crimes. It is horrific what a perfect analogy the 'corona pandemic' is to the early twentieth century Nazism. The two scenarios have so many similarities; populations are told that the government's assaults and restrictions on human rights are for their own safety, whether it would be Germans invading Poland, Czechoslovakia and/or Denmark or the lock-downs, corona tests, mask-wearings, restrictions of travel, restrictions upon the visitation of family members, corona passports and forced vaccination by way of coercion. Since the corona hoax unfolded as daunting as it did in 2020, I sensed that a Danish 5G and smart meter liability claim was not going far enough. Therefore I got behind a COVID-19 liability claim, which was sent to politicians, civil servants, scientists, doctors and nurses, all who have been involved in creating and enforcing the corona restrictions. This liabil

    15 min

  8. 06/10/2025

    #15 - Nobel Prize winner attacks the use of PCR testing and gets ‘Nobel disease’

    Nobel awarded scientist declares the PCR test useless for detecting viral disease Another Nobel Laureate, Kary Mullis, has also helped expose the many lies that, let's call it the ‘mainstream narrative’, has used during the coronavirus pandemic. Biochemist Kary Mullis won a Nobel Prize for inventing the PCR test used to diagnose the HIV virus in AIDS patients. Before his death, he went to great lengths to state that the PCR test cannot be used therapeutically. In a video available on Odysee, he explains why the PCR test cannot tell us anything meaningful about whether the tested person is sick with a virus in connection with a positive PCR test. Unfortunately, Mullis died in August 2019, officially from pneumonia. This happened at a very convenient time for those who make money using the PCR test to test for corona. It is therefore important to emphasise that Kary Mullis has at no point made any specific statements about the PCR test and the corona pandemic, as he died before the pandemic. Instead, he has stated unequivocally that the PCR test cannot be used to test for diseases caused by viruses, for example. The PCR test is also very conveniently used by politicians who want to use the corona pandemic to shut down societies and take control of the population, as happened in Denmark during the lockdowns in 2020 and 2021. Here, the population was put at bay with the primary reason being that the number of infections was increasing, and the PCR test was used as an argument to declare many people sick without them being affected by the virus or disease in any way. Danish Associate Professor Emeritus Niels Harrit at the University of Copenhagen has created a 54-minute lesson in which he goes into great detail about how the PCR test works and the theory behind it. The lesson was videotaped and posted on YouTube, and Harrit explains the DNA and RNA theory behind the PCR test and why it cannot be used to test for COVID-19 disease as a result of a coronavirus attack. He also explains why it is called the RT-PCR test, where RT stands for both ‘Real Time’ and ‘Reverse Transcript’. As both Kary Mullis and Niels Harrit have validated, you can vary the number of cycles when performing a PCR test. And the higher the number of cycles, the higher the probability of finding coronavirus, for example. However, a positive test result does not indicate that the test subject is sick with coronavirus or any other virus. The “Quick Test” (lateral flow test) is even more useless According to the Danish Health Authority, the so-called antigen tests, also known as the quick test, rapid test and self-test, are less accurate than the PCR test. If the inventor deems the PCR test useless for diagnosing coronavirus disease, and the Danish Health Authority states that the antigen test is less reliable than the PCR test, then why are politicians and health authorities so keen on testing for COVID-19 and basing their pandemic-fighting decisions on the results of testing the population? Could it be because politicians and health authorities are in the pocket of the giant pharmaceutical industry? On 16 February 2022, Politiken wrote an article about how poor these rapid tests are under the title ‘The worst test only caught 2.5 percent of those infected’. Although not all of the 46 different variants of rapid tests tested are quite as inaccurate as the worst one according to the article, it illustrates the Wild West market we are dealing with. It's also important to realise that if the authorities hadn't had the PCR and antigen tests to push out news of increased infection rates, we would hardly have had a scenario in Denmark that could be called anything close to a pandemic. I will discuss these dubious testing tools in more detail in a later section about the war-profiteering, longtime friends with the Danish King and deeply immoral businessman, Jeppe Handwerk, who, like the Falck Group, has earned staggering amounts of money selling tests to Danish authorities. Nobelitis - The Nobel disease Of course, it's hard for Big Pharma when Nobel Prize winners like Kary Mullis and Luc Montagnier reveal their profit-driven theatre tricks. So what does Big Pharma do? Well, they get some of their paid minions to slander the scientists in question to undermine their credibility. In the case of Kary Mullis and Luc Montagnier, they have both been unofficially diagnosed with Nobel disease, or Nobelitis. Apparently, it's a disease that affects Nobel Prize winners who become a little too critical of the mainstream narrative. Although there are officially no names of those who carry out this vile diagnosis, Wikipedia does see itself fit to publish an entire article mentioning Kary Mullins and Luc Montagnier among half a dozen other Nobel dissidents. Propaganda comes in many more variants than coronavirus. If you do not feel like becoming a paid monthly subscriber, but want to support my work, you can buy me a cup of coffee for aprrox. 5 USD/35 DKK(click HERE!): Links: Odysee video. Kary Mullis, inventor of the PCR test, explains that the PCR test cannot be used to identify viruses:https://odysee.com/@action4canada:a/05-Kary-Mullis-Inventor-of-the-PCR-Test:f Niels Harrit, chemist, lic.scient. and Associate Professor Emeritus at the University of Copenhagen about the PCR test (in Danish):https://youtu.be/9IEhEaFgCI8 Politiken 16 February 2022 ‘The worst test only caught 2.5 percent of those infected’ (in Danish):https://politiken.dk/forbrugogliv/sundhedogmotion/art8622146/Den-ringeste-test-fangede-kun-25-pct.-af-de-smittede WayBack Machine copy of Danish Health Authority’s homepage discussing PCR and antigen tests: https://web.archive.org/web/20221219090201/https://www.sst.dk/da/corona/Test-symptomer-og-tidlig-behandling/Hvornaar-anbefales-test/Typer-af-test-du-kan-bruge Wikipedia article on Nobel Disease:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_disease BigThink article on September 15, 2023 “Nobel disease: Why some of the world’s greatest scientists eventually go crazy:https://bigthink.com/the-past/nobel-disease-great-scientists-go-crazy/ Get full access to The Danish Illusion at thedanishillusion.substack.com/subscribe

    7 min
See All (22)

About

This podcast offers free listening to the book "The Danish Illusion" read by the author himself. This is Flemming Blicher's personal account on what actually happened from a Danish perspective during the years 2020 through 2022, when the World, first got enthralled in the corona pandemic war, and subsequently war broke out in Ukraine. thedanishillusion.substack.com

Information

  • Creator
    Flemming Blicher
  • Years Active
    2024 - 2026
  • Episodes
    22
  • Rating
    Clean
  • Copyright
    © Flemming Blicher
  • Show Website
    The Danish Illusion Podcast