Major Pandemic's Bunker Bar Podcast

Major Pandemic - Spread the Pandemic
  • 5.0 (1)
  • Education
  • Updated Daily

A blend of entertainment, survival, hunting outdoors and gun reviews. www.majorpandemic.com

  1. 3d ago

    I Chunk Cut Ported my Canik METE Prime

    This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.majorpandemic.com Major Pandemic - MajorPandemic.com is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Thanks for reading Major Pandemic - MajorPandemic.com! This post is public so feel free to share it. Canik METE MC9 Prime Chunk Port Modification: Does a Bigger Port Deliver Less Recoil? By Major Pandemic | MajorPandemic.com Chunk ports are becoming one of the hottest trends in the handgun industry, and for good reason. Manufacturers are increasingly experimenting with larger barrel ports and integrated compensator designs to tame muzzle rise, reduce felt recoil, and deliver flatter-shooting pistols. We’ve seen variations of the concept from Springfield Armory with the Echelon and Smith & Wesson with its Performance Center Carry Comp models. Meanwhile, Canik took a somewhat different approach with the METE MC9 Prime, incorporating its distinctive Tri-Port barrel design. The Prime is already an outstanding pistol right out of the box, but after spending time with my Radian-equipped setup and experiencing how much softer it shot, I started wondering just how much more performance I could squeeze out of the factory Prime. That curiosity led me to an experiment: What would happen if I converted the Canik Prime’s three smaller barrel ports into a single larger chunk-style port? Well, I did it. And honestly, the results surprised me. Why Modify an Already Excellent Pistol? First, let’s give Canik some credit. The METE MC9 Prime is an exceptionally well-executed handgun for its price. The fit, finish, ergonomics, and overall shooting experience are impressive. More importantly, my Prime has been remarkably reliable. However, the Prime does have a relatively sharp recoil impulse and a distinctive bark compared with some other compensated pistols. My theory was simple. The factory Tri-Port system uses three relatively small openings to redirect expanding gases. While effective, those ports are fairly conservative compared with the larger chunk-style ports appearing on newer compensated handguns. In theory, a larger opening could allow a greater volume of propellant gases to escape upward, potentially creating more downward counterforce against muzzle rise. Of course, gas dynamics are more complicated than simply assuming bigger is always better. Port geometry, ammunition pressure, barrel length, projectile velocity, and timing all play a role. Nevertheless, I was curious whether the Prime had some untapped potential. The Chunk Port Experiment I decided to experiment with a spare, replaceable barrel rather than make any permanent changes to the slide or frame. Using my small machine-shop milling equipment, I had the existing barrel port configuration professionally machined into a larger, unified opening. The work was relatively straightforward with the equipment available, although barrel modifications demand proper tooling, careful inspection, and an understanding of the mechanical and safety implications. Importantly, I left the factory slide completely unchanged. This was intentional. The MC9 Prime already has three generous openings in the slide aligned with its barrel ports. I wanted to determine whether those original openings were sufficient to accommodate the altered gas flow without additional slide machining. One concern was whether the larger barrel opening would direct excessive carbon, debris, or hot gases into the interior of the slide. As it turned out, that concern was largely unfounded during my initial testing. First Impressions: It Actually Works Let me skip to the most important observation. The chunk-ported Canik Prime shoots noticeably softer than my original factory configuration. That was the entire point of this project, and I’m happy to report that the modification delivered a genuine improvement in my shooting experience. The difference wasn’t earth-shattering. This wasn’t a transformation from an uncontrollable pistol into a competition race gun. Instead, it was a meaningful refinement of an already excellent handgun. The muzzle tracked flatter, the recoil impulse felt softer, and follow-up shots seemed easier to manage. What surprised me most was that I genuinely hadn’t expected the difference to be particularly noticeable. After all, the factory Prime already incorporates barrel porting. I figured there might be diminishing returns from increasing the port area. Apparently, there was still some performance left on the table. How Does It Compare With the Radian Setup? This was probably the comparison I was most interested in. My earlier Radian-equipped configuration had impressed me with its recoil reduction, and I wanted to know whether the modified Prime could close the gap. Based on my subjective range impressions, the chunk-ported Prime came surprisingly close to the Radian configuration. I’d estimate the remaining difference in muzzle rise between the two at approximately 10–15%, depending on how the pistols and recoil characteristics are evaluated. To be clear, these percentages are my personal estimates rather than measurements from a controlled recoil-testing fixture or high-speed camera analysis. The important takeaway is that the chunk modification appeared to narrow the performance difference considerably. The Prime was already good. With the larger port, it became noticeably better. An Unexpected Benefit: A Different Sound Here’s something I didn’t necessarily anticipate. The modified Prime actually seemed a little quieter to my ears. Now, I certainly wouldn’t claim that the pistol produces fewer measured decibels without proper sound-testing equipment. However, the character of the report changed. The factory Prime has a relatively sharp, snappy bark, possibly influenced by high-pressure gases exiting through its smaller ports. After the modification, the sound seemed to take on a slightly deeper, less piercing character, more reminiscent of the report from some larger compensated pistols. That’s a subjective observation, not a measured noise reduction. Any ported handgun still produces hazardous sound levels and requires appropriate hearing protection. Nevertheless, it was an interesting change. What About Reliability? This is where many modifications either prove themselves or become expensive experiments. A ported barrel changes gas behavior, which can potentially influence the energy available to cycle the slide. Depending on the design, some compensated pistols can become more sensitive to ammunition selection. Fortunately, my modified Prime continued running exceptionally well. During testing, I used a variety of ammunition, including different bullet weights and several batches of my own range reloads. These included 115-grain, 124-grain, and 147-grain projectiles. The handgun functioned reliably throughout my reported testing, including with ammunition that isn’t exactly premium match-grade material. I experienced: * No reported feeding failures. * No reported extraction or ejection problems. * No observed failures to fire. * No noticeable deterioration in cycling reliability. Across approximately 500 rounds of reported testing, the modified Prime demonstrated excellent function. That is encouraging, although 500 rounds is an initial reliability evaluation rather than proof of long-term durability. Additional testing across ammunition brands, operating conditions, and round counts would provide a more complete picture. Still, the results gave me considerable confidence in this particular setup. Surprisingly Clean After 500 Rounds One of my concerns involved the relationship between the larger barrel port and the Prime’s original three slide openings. Would the new configuration dump additional carbon and debris inside the slide? Would it create more fouling around the barrel and internal components? After approximately 500 rounds, I disassembled the pistol and inspected the interior. Honestly, I was surprised. The inside of the slide was remarkably clean. In fact, I couldn’t identify any meaningful increase in fouling compared with the original factory Tri-Port configuration. My impression was that the existing slide openings were already providing more than enough area for gas and debris to escape. I had initially considered whether enlarging the slide openings might be beneficial, but the observed cleanliness gave me little reason to pursue additional modifications. I would not assign a precise percentage to the amount of gas exhausted without instrumentation, but visually, the existing slide geometry appeared to be doing its job exceptionally well. That’s good news because it suggests the factory slide design is already quite capable. Did Accuracy Suffer? This was another important question. Any barrel modification introduces the possibility of negatively affecting accuracy, particularly if it influences the crown, rifling, projectile stability, or barrel harmonics. Fortunately, I didn’t observe any deterioration in accuracy. If anything, I actually shot slightly better groups with the modified configuration. My informal estimate was that some groups improved by approximately 5%. Now, before anyone gets too excited, I’m not suggesting that opening the port magically made the barrel mechanically more accurate. The improvement could simply reflect the softer recoil impulse, better shot-to-shot recovery, or the fact that I happened to be shooting well that day. Without a controlled accuracy test, there’s no way to isolate the exact cause. What matters is that I saw no apparent accuracy penalty from the modification during my range testing. For me, that was a significant win. Why the Canik Prime Is Such an Interesting Platform One reason I was comfortable experimenting with the MC9 Prime is that it’s an unusually strong value proposition. Canik has delivered a tremendous amount of pisto

  2. Oct 17

    Reviewing the Canik MC9 Prime Radian

    This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.majorpandemic.com Canik METE MC9 Prime Radian 9mm Review: Less Recoil, Less Muzzle Flip, More Control Major Pandemic - MajorPandemic.com is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Thanks for reading Major Pandemic - MajorPandemic.com! This post is public so feel free to share it. The micro-compact 9mm market has evolved dramatically over the last several years. What started as a race to produce the smallest, lightest concealed-carry pistol has become a competition to deliver full-size handgun performance in increasingly compact packages. The Canik METE MC9 Prime Radian represents another step in that evolution, combining Canik’s feature-rich MC9 Prime platform with Radian’s compensator technology. The goal is simple: deliver a compact, high-capacity 9mm that offers improved recoil control, reduced muzzle rise, and faster sight recovery without sacrificing the practical advantages of a concealable handgun. The MC9 Prime Platform: A Strong Starting Point The Canik METE MC9 Prime was already an impressive entry into the compact handgun market. Unlike traditional micro-compacts that compromise ergonomics and shooting comfort to achieve their small dimensions, the Prime takes a more performance-oriented approach. The pistol features an ergonomically designed grip, aggressive texturing, an optics-ready slide, and the crisp striker-fired trigger characteristics that have helped Canik build its reputation. Its 17-round magazine capacity also places it among the more capable handguns in its size category. The Prime’s slightly larger grip and performance-focused design make it more substantial than the smallest concealed-carry pistols, but those dimensions provide meaningful benefits in controllability and shooting comfort. Adding Radian’s compensator technology takes that foundation a step further. Radian Compensator: The Real Story Is Muzzle Control The centerpiece of the Radian-equipped MC9 Prime is its compensator system, designed to reduce muzzle rise by redirecting propellant gases during firing. When a conventional pistol fires, the recoil impulse pushes backward against the shooter’s hands while the relationship between the bore axis and grip causes the muzzle to rotate upward. That upward movement is what shooters commonly describe as muzzle flip. The Radian compensator uses escaping propellant gases to generate a counteracting force, helping limit that upward rotation. The important distinction is that reduced muzzle flip is not the same thing as eliminating recoil. The pistol still produces rearward recoil energy. What changes is how the firearm moves during the firing cycle. Reduced muzzle rise can translate into several practical advantages, including less sight movement, quicker recovery between shots, and a more controlled shooting experience. For a compact 9mm, where muzzle movement can be more noticeable than on larger, heavier handguns, those improvements are particularly relevant. Actual effectiveness will depend on ammunition, shooter technique, and the specific configuration. Claims of dramatic recoil reduction should always be evaluated against controlled testing rather than marketing percentages alone. Trigger Performance: One of Canik’s Strongest Advantages Canik has consistently focused on delivering good factory triggers, and the MC9 Prime follows that philosophy. A clean break, predictable pull, and positive reset provide a solid foundation for accurate shooting. On a compact handgun, trigger quality matters because the shorter grip and lighter overall weight can make poor trigger control more noticeable. A good trigger helps the shooter disturb the sight picture less while firing, while the compensator helps manage what happens immediately afterward. Together, these characteristics are intended to provide a more refined shooting experience than one might expect from a compact concealed-carry pistol. Ergonomics, Grip, and Shooting Comfort A compensator can only accomplish so much if the shooter cannot maintain a secure grip. The MC9 Prime’s grip geometry and aggressive texturing are important parts of its performance equation. The fuller grip provides more surface area for the shooter’s hands compared with smaller micro-compact designs. Better hand contact generally translates into more consistent control, particularly during rapid strings of fire. The tradeoff is concealability. A longer, fuller grip may be more noticeable under clothing than the shorter grip of a conventional micro-compact. However, that compromise can be worthwhile for shooters who prioritize a balance between practical carry dimensions and range performance. Optics-Ready Design and Modern Features The MC9 Prime platform embraces the growing expectation that modern defensive handguns should support miniature red-dot sights. An optics-ready slide allows shooters to configure the pistol around their preferred sighting system, subject to optic compatibility. The addition of a red-dot sight can complement the compensator because a flatter-shooting pistol may help keep the dot within the optic window during recoil. That does not automatically make the shooter faster or more accurate, but it can reduce the amount of visual movement that must be managed between shots. The pistol’s modern controls and performance-focused construction further reinforce its position as something more sophisticated than a basic concealed-carry handgun. Range Performance: Where the Radian System Should Shine The most compelling argument for a compensated compact handgun isn’t necessarily defensive use. It’s how enjoyable and controllable the pistol can become during extended range sessions. Small 9mm pistols often produce a snappier shooting experience than larger handguns. While manageable, that repeated muzzle movement and concentrated recoil sensation can become tiring. A well-designed compensator can help reduce muzzle movement, making extended practice more comfortable for some shooters. It may also improve shot-to-shot consistency, particularly when shooting multiple rounds in succession. However, compensators introduce their own considerations. They can increase upward gas discharge, muzzle blast, and cleaning requirements. Their effectiveness can also vary with ammunition selection. Reliability testing is especially important because changes to barrel and compensator configurations can affect how a pistol cycles. Ultimately, the real-world value of the system should be measured by how consistently the pistol runs and how effectively it helps the shooter maintain control. Concealed Carry Versus Performance The MC9 Prime Radian sits in an increasingly popular category of handguns that blur the line between dedicated concealed-carry pistols and compact performance guns. Its 17-round capacity, capable trigger, ergonomic grip, and recoil-management features give it characteristics traditionally associated with larger handguns. At the same time, the compact format keeps it relevant for concealed carry. The compensated configuration may add overall length and could require a compatible holster, so prospective buyers should evaluate those practical considerations before assuming it will carry exactly like the standard Prime. For someone who wants one handgun capable of serving as a daily carry pistol and an enjoyable range gun, the concept is appealing. Is the Radian Version Worth the Additional Cost? The value proposition depends on what a shooter wants from the handgun. Someone primarily interested in the smallest possible concealed-carry pistol may find that the standard MC9 Prime already provides the desired combination of size, capacity, and features. A shooter who spends considerable time at the range, values reduced muzzle rise, or simply prefers the shooting characteristics of compensated handguns may find the Radian configuration more attractive. The decision should come down to measurable improvements in performance, personal shooting comfort, and the price difference between configurations. A compensator alone should never be mistaken for a guarantee of faster or more accurate shooting. Final Verdict: A More Refined Compact 9mm The Canik METE MC9 Prime Radian represents the direction the premium compact handgun market is moving. Manufacturers are no longer satisfied with offering small pistols that are merely convenient to carry. The expectation is increasingly that compact handguns should deliver excellent triggers, usable ergonomics, substantial ammunition capacity, optics compatibility, and sophisticated recoil-management systems. The MC9 Prime already checks many of those boxes. Radian’s compensator technology adds another potentially valuable dimension by addressing one of the most persistent complaints about compact 9mm handguns: excessive muzzle movement. The biggest selling point isn’t that the pistol produces less recoil on paper. It’s the potential for a flatter, more controlled shooting experience in a carry-friendly package. Whether the improvements justify the price premium will ultimately depend on real-world reliability, ammunition compatibility, and comparison testing against the standard MC9 Prime. For shooters who appreciate modern handgun engineering and want a compact 9mm that emphasizes control rather than simply minimizing dimensions, the MC9 Prime Radian is an intriguing option worth a closer look. Major Pandemic’s Bunker Bar — Practical reviews, real-world performance, and firearms engineering without the marketing fluff. Major Pandemic - MajorPandemic.com is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Thanks for reading Major Pandemic - MajorPandemic.com! This post is public so feel free to share it.

  3. Sep 29

    FRT - Forced Reset Triggers Tested - AS Design, Deez Nuts, and Atrius

    This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.majorpandemic.com FRT Trigger Testing: Are Forced Reset Triggers Reliable, Practical, or Just a Damn Good Range Toy? Major Pandemic - MajorPandemic.com is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Major Pandemic’s Bunker Bar Forced reset triggers—better known simply as FRTs—are having a moment. They promise a shooting experience that can produce an incredibly fast cadence while still operating around an individual trigger function for each shot. That sounds great on paper, but I wanted to answer a much more practical question: Are FRTs actually reliable, easy to live with, and worth putting into an AR—or are they mostly an entertaining range toy that requires more patience than most shooters expect? To find out, I tested several different FRT-style systems from Deez Nuts Tactical, AS Designs, and Atreus across multiple AR platforms. And after moving these systems between different rifles, triggers, bolt-carrier groups, buffer configurations and gas systems, I came away with one overwhelmingly clear conclusion: FRTs can be an absolute blast—but they are not necessarily plug-and-play. What Is an FRT Trigger? An FRT, or forced reset trigger, mechanically assists the trigger reset as the firearm cycles. The result is a dramatically faster potential firing cadence than you would normally get from a conventional semi-automatic trigger. That does not automatically mean every rifle equipped with one behaves identically. Far from it. One of the biggest lessons from my testing was that the rifle itself becomes part of the FRT system. Small variations in components, tolerances, gas delivery and cycling characteristics can have a surprisingly large impact on reliability. That means an FRT that runs beautifully in one AR may be troublesome when those same basic components are moved into another. The Three FRT Systems I Tested For this project, I deliberately chose several different approaches. Deez Nuts Tactical FRT The Deez Nuts Tactical system represents what I would consider the more traditional or straightforward FRT approach. The design is relatively simple, and the examples I tested appeared well made. That last part matters. There are a lot of FRT-style components available today, and quality can vary considerably. With a mechanism operating at this speed, I don’t believe questionable parts are the place to save a few dollars. The Deez Nuts system was attractive because it provided a comparatively simple entry into the FRT experience without requiring an elaborate build. And simplicity turned out to be valuable. AS Designs FRT The AS Designs FRT was another system that performed well during my testing. Of the more advanced setups I tried, I generally experienced fewer problems with the AS Designs configuration once the rifle and trigger combination were behaving properly. One reason may simply be that the system narrows the number of variables involved. When you start introducing radically different trigger geometries and highly specialized aftermarket components, you create additional variables that can affect timing and cycling. The AS Designs setup felt comparatively predictable. Atreus FRT The Atreus system was probably the most interesting of the three. From a design standpoint, it offered some of the flexibility I liked most because it potentially opens the door to a broader selection of aftermarket triggers. That includes some of the lighter, performance-oriented trigger options many shooters already prefer. But that flexibility comes with a tradeoff. In my testing, Atreus also proved to be somewhat more sensitive to the particular rifle in which it was installed. I could get the system running extremely well in some rifles while another specific build simply refused to behave the same way. That experience perfectly illustrates one of the most important things anybody considering an FRT should understand. Every AR Is Different AR owners sometimes assume that because two rifles share the same basic pattern, they should behave identically. With FRTs, that assumption can get frustrating very quickly. I tested systems across several different rifles and discovered that a combination that ran beautifully in one firearm did not necessarily produce the same result when transferred into another. In one older, generously gassed AR configuration, virtually everything seemed happy. Other rifles were considerably more particular. That does not necessarily mean there is something wrong with the FRT. It also does not necessarily mean something is wrong with the rifle. It means you are dealing with a system where timing, cycling energy and component tolerances matter more than they do with a conventional semi-automatic trigger. That is probably the single biggest takeaway from this entire experiment. FRT Reliability: How Reliable Were They? This is where things get interesting. Once properly matched to a rifle, several of the FRT configurations I tested were highly reliable. But none of them gave me the same absolute confidence that I would expect from a quality conventional semi-automatic trigger. There is simply more happening mechanically. More interaction between components means more opportunities for tolerances, fouling, ammunition differences or cycling characteristics to affect performance. During testing, I encountered situations where the rifle would experience an issue while using the FRT mode but would immediately return to normal operation when switched back to conventional semi-automatic fire. That tells you something important. The rifle itself may be perfectly functional while the additional timing requirements of the FRT system push it outside its happy operating window. Are FRTs Good for Home Defense? For me, the answer is straightforward: I would not choose an FRT-equipped rifle as my primary defensive rifle. That conclusion is not because I think FRTs are inherently bad. It is because defensive firearms occupy a completely different category. For a defensive rifle, my priorities are boring: Reliability. Predictability. Simplicity. I want something that works every single time under the worst possible circumstances. During my testing, the FRT systems could achieve very high reliability once sorted out, but I still occasionally encountered problems. I therefore would not personally put them in the same reliability category as a proven conventional trigger setup. The transcript testing reached the same bottom line: even when reliability was in the high-90-percent range, occasional issues remained, and the recommendation was not to treat these systems as first-choice defensive equipment. Where FRTs Make Perfect Sense: Range Toys and Clone Builds Now we get to the fun part. Because as a range toy? Absolutely. This is where I think FRTs shine. Put one into an appropriate recreational AR, get the rifle functioning reliably, bring a pile of ammunition and prepare to start laughing. There is something inherently entertaining about the cadence these systems can produce. Bang-gety-bang-gety-bang-gety-bang. It sounds less like somebody methodically shooting an AR and more like somebody turned a sewing machine loose on the firing line. And yes, ammunition disappears accordingly. Very quickly. For a clone build, novelty rifle or dedicated range gun, however, that may be exactly the point. The testing ultimately came down strongly in favor of this role: build a range toy, have fun and enjoy the FRT experience, rather than assuming it needs to serve a serious defensive purpose. The Cheap FRT Range-Gun Argument One thing became increasingly obvious during this project: You do not necessarily need to put an FRT into your most expensive AR. In fact, I would argue there is a pretty compelling reason not to. Rapid strings of fire create heat. Heat creates wear. And lots of rapid shooting burns ammunition at a rate capable of making your credit card whimper. That makes a reasonably priced dedicated range rifle an interesting platform for an FRT. Instead of taking an expensive precision-oriented or carefully balanced rifle and changing its operating characteristics, I would rather start with something I am comfortable treating like a recreational machine. Shoot it. Enjoy it. Maintain it. And if you eventually wear out a component, replace it. When the ammunition bill eventually becomes substantially larger than the cost of the barrel, worrying excessively about barrel life starts becoming somewhat academic. FRTs Are Not Necessarily Drop-In Components If there is one misconception I would eliminate, it is the idea that every FRT is simply: Buy it. Drop it in. Shoot it. Sometimes that may happen. Sometimes it won’t. My testing showed enough variation between rifles that anyone considering an FRT should expect that compatibility and reliability may differ considerably from one firearm to another. This is especially relevant for highly customized AR builds. A beautifully balanced rifle that has been optimized around a particular combination of components may not automatically be the ideal host for an FRT. And personally, I would hesitate before changing an expensive, perfectly functioning rifle simply to accommodate one. FRT Safety Deserves Serious Attention The speed of these systems makes proper function particularly important. During testing, I encountered combinations where the relationship between cycling and trigger behavior did not inspire enough confidence for me to continue using that particular configuration. That is a good reminder that these systems should not be treated casually simply because they are entertaining. Component quality matters. Proper function matters. Testing matters. And if something does not seem mechanically correct, stop. One specific lesson from my testing was that I would be especially conservative about experimenting with platforms whe

  4. Sep 6

    MDT AAC Premier 10/22 Chassis - Simply the Best 10/22 chassis ever

    This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.majorpandemic.com MDT ACC Premier Gen2 10/22 Chassis: Upgrading a Legend Without question, the Ruger 10/22 is one of my favorite .22s of all time. I have shot the crap out of these rifles over the years, built more of them than I can count, and I keep coming back to the platform for one reason: the 10/22 can become almost anything you want it to be. It can be a cheap backyard plinker, a lightweight field rifle, a suppressor host, a steel-challenge gun, or an absolutely ridiculous precision build. And once you move into that last category, the chassis starts to matter a lot. That brings us to the MDT ACC Premier Gen2 chassis for the Ruger 10/22. This is a chassis I have wanted MDT to build for years, and for PRS-style rimfire, NRL22, NRL22X, bench shooting, or anyone obsessed with squeezing every last bit of accuracy out of a custom 10/22, this is about as serious as it gets. I Have Been Waiting for This One My history with MDT goes way back. Around 2009, I was introduced to MDT and its LSS chassis, a compact billet-aluminum system designed to lock an action solidly into place. The results were impressive, and I became a believer pretty quickly. Since then, MDT has grown into one of the biggest names in precision rifle chassis systems. But for years I kept asking one question: Where is the Ruger 10/22 inlet? The concern was understandable. Would people really spend serious money putting a premium precision chassis around a 10/22? My answer was always yes. Anyone deep into custom 10/22s knows these rifles can go far beyond the factory gun sitting on the rack at a sporting-goods store. Add a premium receiver, match barrel, bolt, trigger, optic and competition hardware, and suddenly you have a rifle capable of some truly stupid levels of accuracy. That kind of build deserves a chassis to match. Fixing the 10/22’s Biggest Weakness The basic 10/22 action was never designed around the idea of becoming a heavy precision competition rifle. One of its limitations is the way the action mounts into the stock. The system relies heavily on a single primary mounting point, and when you’re chasing tiny groups, any movement in the receiver becomes something you want to eliminate. Over the years, manufacturers have attacked that problem with rear tangs, wedges, tension screws and other solutions. MDT took a different approach. The ACC Premier Gen2 uses a yoke-style system at the rear of the receiver to help lock the action solidly into the chassis. That is the part of this design I really like. Instead of just machining a 10/22-shaped hole into an existing chassis and calling it good, MDT actually addressed one of the fundamental weaknesses of the platform. The result is a receiver that feels properly supported and locked in place. Heavy Is the Point This is not a lightweight squirrel rifle chassis. And it isn’t supposed to be. The ACC Premier Gen2 is designed around stability. For bench shooting, barricades, bags, bipods and PRS-style competition, weight is often your friend. A heavier rifle moves less. A rigid chassis flexes less. A properly supported action stays consistent. That doesn’t mean adding weight magically makes a rifle more accurate, but if you already have an extremely accurate barreled action, a stable platform helps you take advantage of what that rifle can do. I had already seen this with MDT’s more affordable Oryx chassis, where some of my best 10/22 groups came from a heavy, rigid setup. The ACC Premier Gen2 takes that concept and adds far more adjustability and competition-oriented refinement. For carrying through the woods all day? Probably not. For bench work, NRL22, NRL22X or a ridiculous custom precision build? Absolutely. Built Around the Shooter The appeal of a premium chassis isn’t simply that it’s a giant piece of aluminum. You’re paying for adjustability, ergonomics, balance and mounting options. Comb height matters. Length of pull matters. Bipod position matters. How the rifle balances on a bag matters. The ACC Premier Gen2 gives you the ability to tune the rifle around the shooter instead of forcing the shooter to adapt to the rifle. Pair it with an ARCA-mounted bipod and you end up with an exceptionally stable platform. M-LOK and other attachment options give you plenty of room to configure the rifle exactly how you want it. That’s the difference between a stock and a true precision chassis. Yes, It Is Expensive We’re talking about roughly an $1,100 chassis. That is a lot of money to wrap around a .22 LR action. But context matters. Once you start talking about premium receivers, match barrels, custom triggers, bolts and quality optics, a high-end 10/22 build can easily climb into several thousand dollars. At that point, spending serious money on the chassis isn’t nearly as crazy as it sounds. The better question is whether the ACC Premier Gen2 earns its place in that build. For me, it does. This feels like lifetime-quality equipment. It is not something I look at and expect to feel outdated in five or ten years. There is a difference between expensive and overpriced. This is expensive. I don’t think it is overpriced. The Rest of the Build Still Matters Obviously, the chassis is only one part of the equation. Start with a good receiver. Add a quality barrel from somebody like Feddersen, Proof Research, KIDD, Volquartsen or another proven rimfire barrel maker. Use a good match bolt. Install a legitimately good trigger. Then lock everything into the ACC Premier Gen2. At that point, you have the foundation for an absolutely ridiculous precision 10/22. And don’t forget the optic. For rimfire work, parallax adjustment is a big deal. I strongly prefer an optic that adjusts down to at least 25 yards, and 10 yards is even better. Then comes ammunition. A great 10/22 can make cheap ammunition look surprisingly good, but when you start feeding it Lapua, SK or other quality match ammo, that’s when the magic really starts. Final Thoughts I’ve wanted MDT to build a serious 10/22 chassis for years. Now they finally have, and they didn’t simply check the box. They addressed the receiver lockup, brought the adjustability and stability of a serious precision chassis to the 10/22 platform, and created something that feels completely at home underneath a high-dollar rimfire build. The MDT ACC Premier Gen2 10/22 chassis is big, heavy, rigid, adjustable and unapologetically built for precision. It isn’t for the guy throwing together a casual plinker. It’s for the shooter who already understands just how far a custom 10/22 can be pushed. For that guy, MDT finally built the chassis I’ve been asking for. And they didn’t just knock it out of the park. They shot the damn ball to the moon. Upgrade a legend. Build the 10/22 you always wanted. Major Pandemic - MajorPandemic.com is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Thanks for reading Major Pandemic - MajorPandemic.com! This post is public so feel free to share it.

  5. Aug 25

    StellAR Arms - Possibly the Best AR I have Owned

    This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.majorpandemic.com Stellar Arms: The Rare AR That Actually Surprised Me After more than 20 years around the firearms industry, I have become pretty difficult to impress. That is not necessarily because the products are bad. The problem is that genuine innovation in the AR market is rare. There are an incredible number of very good rifles available today, but much of what gets marketed as “new” is usually another variation of something we have already seen. Different handguard. Different coating. Different furniture. Maybe a new logo carved into the receiver. Warm it over, change a couple things, and call it innovation. So when something genuinely catches my attention, I pay attention. That is exactly what happened with Stellar Arms. Stumbling Into Something Different My introduction to Stellar was almost accidental. I had previously noticed some of their rifles hanging on the wall at 88 Tactical’s massive facility in Nebraska. Later, while wandering around Lincoln, I remembered the name and decided to look them up. That little detour turned into one of the more interesting discoveries I have made in the AR world in a long time. The first thing that struck me was the level of machining. This was not simply another billet receiver set with some aggressive styling carved into it. Stellar was doing things I had rarely seen executed this well on a production-class AR. The handguard indexes into the upper receiver so precisely that visually it can be difficult to see where one component ends and the other begins. Then an additional locking system ties the assembly together into something approaching the rigidity of a monolithic upper. The mating surfaces were nearly perfect. And coming from somebody who has built a ridiculous number of ARs over the years, that got my attention immediately. Aerospace Manufacturing Shows There is a reason these rifles feel different. Stellar’s roots are in aerospace manufacturing. Their previous firearms branding was MASP, operating under the broader aerospace manufacturing operation, and they have been working on these guns for roughly 13 years. That matters. Walk through the manufacturing capability and you begin to understand why the rifles look the way they do. Five-axis machining, advanced machining centers, metal 3D printing and an operation capable of producing extremely complex parts are all part of the equation. This is not a company buying receivers, handguards and controls from half a dozen suppliers and assembling another AR. They manufacture a significant portion of the rifle themselves. Upper receivers. Lower receivers. Handguards. Gas blocks. Muzzle brakes. Selectors. Magazine releases. Magazine catches. End plates. Charging handles. And numerous other components. There are obviously parts sourced from outside manufacturers where it makes sense. Stellar uses B5 furniture, for example, and Elfman Tactical triggers across the lineup. Springs, detents and several smaller components are sourced as well. But even there, the emphasis is clearly on premium components and premium finishes. The result feels less like an assembled rifle and more like a rifle that was engineered as a complete system. Fit and Finish That Shouldn’t Be Remarkable — But Is Anyone who has assembled enough billet ARs knows that “premium” does not automatically mean “everything fits perfectly.” Sometimes it means exactly the opposite. Specialized receivers can introduce tolerance stacking. Upper and lower receivers may need adjustment. Handguards may require some persuasion. Anodizing thickness can change fitment just enough to create problems. With both of the MASP receiver sets I built, none of that happened. Everything went together exactly as it should. That includes an anodized green receiver set where the upper-to-lower fit remained exceptionally tight after finishing. Think about what that means. If two precision-machined components still fit properly after anodizing, the manufacturer accounted for the dimensional change introduced by the coating process. That is the kind of detail you expect from aerospace manufacturing. The receivers even include provisions for a nylon-tipped tensioning screw between the upper and lower. The funny part? You don’t need it. The fit is already that good. The Stellar Lineup Stellar essentially builds three main production tiers, followed by some extremely high-end custom offerings. The Technician is the entry point at roughly $1,866. Calling an almost $1,900 rifle “entry level” tells you immediately where Stellar is positioning itself. Even the Technician uses billet construction and many of Stellar’s in-house components. This is not a stripped-down economy gun intended to get customers through the door. The next step is the Specialist, priced around $2,400. That is the rifle I ended up with. Above it sits the Executive, beginning somewhere in the roughly $3,200-$3,400 range depending on configuration. Then things start getting wild. Stellar also builds custom rifles and packages stretching considerably higher, including configurations approaching the $12,000 level. Clearly, competing with inexpensive ARs isn’t the goal. The goal is building some of the most premium AR-platform rifles available. The Executive Is Essentially Machined Jewelry The Executive is where Stellar’s manufacturing capabilities become almost ridiculous. One of its signature details is an extensive crosshatch machining treatment covering essentially the entire exterior surface of the rifle. Not just a decorative panel. Not just the magazine well. The contours of the rifle receive this incredibly detailed machining treatment. That process can consume roughly an entire day of machine time. Machine time is expensive. But the result is absolutely stunning. I have seen some extraordinary custom rifles over the years. I have been fortunate enough to work on high-dollar firearms projects, including guns auctioned to raise around $100,000 for the Lone Survivor Foundation. I have handled and built some fairly crazy stuff. The Stellar Executive still stopped me. It genuinely looks like jewelry. Calling it the most beautiful production-class custom AR I have personally seen would not be an exaggeration. Building the Specialist Eventually I decided I needed one. During my visit I built a Stellar Specialist under their supervision, which gave me an opportunity to see the rifle from a perspective that simply handling a completed gun cannot provide. Everything went together correctly. No weird surprises. No machining issues. No tolerance problems. No parts that suddenly required fitting despite supposedly being designed for one another. Apparently I did well enough assembling it that the guys suggested I could get a job building rifles. I’ll take the compliment. I even managed to show them one of my own little assembly tricks they hadn’t seen before. Pandemic teaching the aerospace guys something. I’ll take that one too. A Charging Handle That Actually Solves Something One component I particularly liked was Stellar’s Throttle charging handle. Mount an LPVO on an AR and charging-handle access can become annoying quickly. Your fingers end up fighting around the optic while trying to get enough purchase on the handle. Stellar addressed that problem with an extended design specifically intended to provide better access around optics. But the interesting part is the gas management. Their vented version routes excess gas toward the right side, moving it away from the shooter’s face. That is a small detail, but it illustrates the broader theme of the rifle. Somebody actually thought about how the component would be used. It isn’t different just so Stellar can advertise something different. It solves a legitimate problem. Premium Components Where They Matter The Specialist continues that philosophy throughout the rifle. The trigger is from Elfman Tactical. The bolt carrier group is a premium Sand Cutter-style unit. The barrel is a premium 5.56 barrel. The bolt carrier groups receive high-pressure testing and magnetic-particle inspection. The controls are well positioned. There aren’t sharp edges where there shouldn’t be sharp edges. The lower receiver is heavily stylized without becoming uncomfortable or awkward. And there is no forward assist. Stellar’s reasoning is straightforward: on this class of rifle, they don’t believe the forward assist is necessary. I tend to agree. I cannot remember the last time I actually needed one. If a cartridge refuses to chamber, my inclination is not to force it harder into the chamber. Something is wrong, and I would rather remove the round and determine why. The slab-side upper also contributes to the rifle’s clean appearance. One Area I Would Like to See Evolve If there is one area where I think the rifle could move forward, it is the muzzle-device mounting system. Stellar currently uses an ASR-pattern threaded QD brake, although without the traditional ratcheting mechanism. It is beautifully machined and visually fits the rifle extremely well. The issue is simply where the suppressor market seems to be moving. A lot of shooters are shifting toward smaller, lighter mounting standards such as Plan B-style systems and compact options such as YHM’s SRX. Stellar told me they are working on some Plan B-oriented designs, although nothing was officially released at the time. That would make a lot of sense. If they bring the same level of engineering to a more compact suppressor mounting system, I would absolutely like to see it. The Difference Between Expensive and Engineered There are plenty of expensive ARs. Expensive does not automatically mean exceptional. Sometimes you’re paying for a brand name. Sometimes you’re paying for a coating. Sometimes you’re paying for a collection of premium aftermarket components installed on somebody else’s receivers.

  6. Jul 31

    No crappy plastic holster belt clips - DCC is a better clip for under $15

    This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.majorpandemic.com Best Holster Clips: Why Discreet Carry Concepts May Be the Best Upgrade for Your IWB Holster A great concealed-carry holster can still fail at the worst possible moment if it is attached to your belt with a weak clip. That sounds dramatic until you see someone draw a handgun and watch the entire holster come out with it. It happens during range sessions, defensive training and dry-fire practice. The gun clears the waistband, but the holster remains attached to the firearm because the clip failed to hold onto the belt. The problem is often not the holster itself. It is the cheap plastic belt clip attached to it. Fortunately, replacing a poor holster clip may cost less than $20 and can dramatically improve retention, concealment and everyday comfort. Why Holster Clips Matter The holster performs two separate retention jobs. First, it must retain the handgun until the shooter deliberately draws it. Second, the holster itself must remain firmly attached to the wearer’s belt or waistband. A holster that holds the handgun securely but pulls free during the draw is still a failed system. Many inexpensive IWB holsters come with a wide, generic polymer clip secured by two screws. These clips are cheap, simple and easy for manufacturers to install. Unfortunately, they are often the weakest part of the holster. Poor holster clips can: * Slide off narrow or slick belts * Flex excessively during the draw * Fail to hook underneath the belt * Catch on clothing or furniture * Break after repeated use * Allow the holster to shift or rotate * Increase printing under clothing A better clip can turn an inexpensive holster into a much more dependable carry system. The Problem With Cheap Plastic Holster Clips Not every polymer clip is bad. Mission First Tactical, for example, has developed aggressive polymer clips that perform much better than the generic versions found on many entry-level holsters. Polymer also has one legitimate advantage: it is generally easier on clothing and leather belts. However, common plastic clips have several weaknesses. Polymer can be slippery Plastic naturally tends to slide more easily than properly formed spring steel. When the clip is installed over a narrow, smooth or low-profile belt, it may not have enough bite to resist the upward force of the draw. Plastic clips can break Holster clips experience repeated flexing every time the holster is installed or removed. They also get hit against chairs, vehicle interiors, counters and other hard surfaces. Over time, polymer clips may crack or snap. Excessive flex reduces retention Spring steel generally increases resistance as it is flexed farther open. Many polymer clips do not produce the same progressive clamping force. A plastic clip may accommodate a wider range of belt thicknesses, but that flexibility does not always translate into better retention. Large removal tabs catch on everything Many polymer clips use an oversized outward-facing ramp or lip. This helps the clip slide over the waistband and gives the user a place to lift it during removal. Unfortunately, some manufacturers make that ramp far too large. The result is a protruding catch point that can snag on shirts, furniture, seat belts and other objects. Discreet Carry Concepts Holster Clips Discreet Carry Concepts, commonly abbreviated as DCC, produces some of the best spring-steel holster clips currently available. These clips are found on many premium concealed-carry holsters, but they can also be installed on affordable holsters from companies such as We The People, Black Scorpion Gear, CrossBreed and Mission First Tactical. That means you do not necessarily need to spend $100 or more on an entirely new holster. A relatively inexpensive clip upgrade can provide many of the same retention benefits found on considerably more expensive systems. Why DCC Clips Work So Well DCC clips use thin spring steel with substantial downward clamping force. They are also designed with an aggressive lower hook that catches beneath the belt or waistband. Several design details help distinguish them from ordinary clips. Thin profile DCC clips are significantly thinner than many molded polymer clips. The reduced thickness can improve concealment and reduce unnecessary bulk around the waistband. Strong spring tension The steel construction provides considerable clamping force once the clip is secured against the holster. This helps the clip remain attached to both traditional gun belts and thinner everyday belts. Aggressive lower hook The lower portion of the clip includes a sharply formed hook that catches beneath the belt. That hook is critical because it resists the upward force created during the draw. Minimal front ramp DCC clips use a relatively short ramp at the nose. It is large enough to help the clip move over the belt during installation, but small enough to reduce snagging. This is a major improvement over clips with oversized protruding removal tabs. DCC Monoblock Gear Clip For many holsters, the DCC Monoblock is the easiest and most affordable upgrade. The Monoblock replaces the common wide plastic clip used on countless IWB holsters. It attaches through the holster’s existing two-hole mounting pattern and provides two spring-steel gripping points in one compact unit. This design helps: * Prevent the holster from pulling free * Reduce unwanted rotation * Improve stability * Maintain a low profile * Grip belts and waistbands securely The Monoblock itself is inexpensive, making it one of the best value upgrades available for an IWB holster. Do Not Forget the Correct Hardware One important detail is easy to overlook. The original screws used with a thick plastic clip may be too long for a much thinner steel replacement. Attempting to reuse those screws can prevent the clip from tightening correctly or cause the hardware to extend too far through the mounting posts. Purchasing the proper DCC hardware kit is usually worthwhile. The correct shorter screws and mounting hardware help ensure the clip is securely attached without damaging the holster or interfering with the firearm. DCC HLR Gear Clips DCC HLR clips are an excellent choice for holsters that use two separate attachment points or require adjustable cant and ride height. The HLR series provides particularly aggressive belt engagement. These clips work well for people who prioritize maximum retention and want the holster firmly locked into position. They may also help improve concealment because separate clips can distribute the weight of the handgun over a wider area. For heavier pistols or holsters that tend to rotate, dual HLR clips may provide a noticeable improvement over a single central attachment. DCC 1 Series Gear Clips The DCC 1 Series offers a more traditional steel-clip shape. It retains many of the advantages of the HLR design but uses a somewhat less aggressive lower section. That can make it a better option for someone concerned about damaging an expensive leather belt. The 1 Series may be appropriate when: * Maximum retention is still important * The belt surface needs additional protection * A traditional clip profile is preferred * The holster requires cant or ride-height adjustment The HLR remains the stronger choice when maximum grip is the priority, while the 1 Series offers a slightly more belt-friendly compromise. UltiClip Holster Attachments UltiClip takes a different approach. Instead of functioning primarily as a spring-steel hook, an UltiClip uses a mechanical clamping system. The clip closes over clothing or a belt and locks into position with a hinged lever. The result is extremely strong clamping force. UltiClip products can be particularly effective for: * Fixed-blade knives * EDC tools * Beltless carry * Lightweight equipment * Applications requiring direct attachment to clothing The system grips exceptionally well, but that strength comes with tradeoffs. UltiClip Disadvantages on Handgun Holsters The UltiClip has a relatively narrow gripping surface. When supporting the weight and leverage of a handgun, that concentrates force in a small area. Depending on the holster and carry position, this can allow more movement than a wider attachment system. UltiClips can also be hard on clothing and leather belts. Because they clamp directly against the belt or fabric, their metal edges and high pressure may leave marks, wear spots or even holes. This appears to be less of an issue when they are used with knives or lightweight equipment. On a handgun holster, however, the additional thickness and movement of the firearm can increase wear. For that reason, UltiClip remains an excellent product, but it may not be the ideal choice for every IWB handgun holster. CrossBreed Micro SnapLok Clips CrossBreed’s Micro SnapLok is another strong all-metal attachment. These clips are durable, substantial and offer considerably better retention than most generic plastic clips. They were among the better choices available before the current generation of DCC products became widely used. The potential weakness is the larger ramp at the front of the clip. That protruding nose can catch on objects and may bend if it is struck or snagged hard enough. DCC offers comparable steel designs with a shorter, less exposed front ramp. Owners of CrossBreed holsters may therefore benefit from evaluating compatible DCC HLR or 1 Series clips. Can Better Clips Improve Concealment? A better clip does more than keep the holster attached during the draw. It can also improve concealment. When a holster shifts, rotates or rides upward, the handgun may begin to print through the wearer’s shirt. A stronger clip helps maintain the intended ride height and cant. Dual clips or a properly sized Monoblock can also stabilize the holster against the body. Potential concealment improvements include: * Less holster rotation * More consistent grip position * Reduced moveme

  7. Jul 11

    Modern Spartan Systems - lube & cleaner that is safe, non-toxic and it works even improving accuracy.

    This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.majorpandemic.com Modern Spartan Systems Review: Green Gun Lube, Cleaners, and Suppressor Shield Tested Modern Spartan Systems caught my attention because I take firearm lubrication seriously. A good lubricant is not just about making a gun feel slick. It is the heart and soul of keeping a firearm running, protected, corrosion-resistant, and consistent. After testing Modern Spartan Systems products, I came away impressed for a lot of reasons, including several I did not expect.Join - Modern Spartan Systems - The Great Mass Gun Optimization Experiment - modernspartansystems.com/great-experiment Modern Spartan Systems is built around a green, safer lubricant technology. Their product line reaches beyond firearms into areas like machine cutting oil, engine oil additives, fishing reel care, and knife lubrication, but the focus here is their firearms lineup: Accuracy Oil, Carbon Destroyer, Carbon Destroyer Double X, Copper Lead Destroyer, Crystal Clear, Nothing Left Behind, Spartan Accuracy Grease, Suppressor Shield, and their shooter kits. What I like right away is that this is not a giant catalog full of random products. They have a focused lineup, and from my testing, the products work extremely well. The core technology is based around bonded lubrication. This is not a typical “slather it on and go” gun oil. With Modern Spartan Systems, the application process matters. The surface needs to be properly cleaned and prepped so the lubricant can bond to the metal. That is where the real benefit starts to show up. The idea is pretty simple: reduce friction, fill microscopic pores and surface imperfections, and create less drag between moving parts. In the bore, that means less drag between the barrel and bullet. Logically, that can help tighten standard deviations from shot to shot, and in my testing, I saw about a 20% improvement in accuracy. That does not make it magic. It makes sense mechanically. A smoother, better-treated surface can help improve consistency. In my before-and-after testing, I saw a rifle that had been shooting around one-inch groups move into the 0.8 to 0.75-inch range. Your results may vary, but the logic is there, and my results backed it up. The first product I would recommend trying is actually Crystal Clear, their lens cleaner. It may be the standout product in the whole lineup because almost everyone can use it. Shooters have scopes, red dots, range glasses, sunglasses, and binoculars. Even non-shooters have sunglasses or prescription glasses. I used Crystal Clear on an old set of sunglasses I kept in my truck. I thought they were scratched up and worn out. After a couple of cleanings, they looked like new sunglasses. It also helped reduce fogging and left an anti-static layer that repels dust. That is a big deal for optics because some cleaners leave behind a static charge that actually attracts dust and makes lenses harder to keep clean. If you test nothing else from Modern Spartan Systems, try Crystal Clear. It is inexpensive, useful, and easy to judge immediately. The firearm cleaning products also performed well. Carbon Destroyer was one of the bigger surprises. I tested it with an ultrasonic cleaner and also with a simple Ziploc bag method. For a bolt carrier group, I let the parts soak, came back later, and saw black and brown carbon fouling pulled out of the parts. It worked shockingly well. The key is dwell time. This is not always a quick spray-and-wipe process, especially the first time. The first deep clean and treatment takes longer because you are stripping the surface down and preparing it for the bonded lubricant. After that, follow-up cleanings become much faster. For the bore, the process continues with Copper Lead Destroyer, then a final clean and dry before applying Accuracy Oil. Accuracy Oil is not a one-pass conventional oil treatment. It needs to be applied as a process because the carrier solution evaporates off and leaves the bonded lubricant behind. The treated surface may look fairly dry afterward, but that is part of how the product works. For moving parts and higher-friction areas, Spartan Accuracy Grease makes sense. I used it on bolt carrier group contact points and also like the idea of using it lightly in a buffer tube. A little grease on the buffer spring can quiet down spring noise dramatically, which is basically the cheap version of buying one of those expensive quiet buffer springs. The Suppressor Shield process is similar. You want the suppressor as clean as possible before treatment. For suppressors, I recommend an ultrasonic cleaner when possible because suppressors have a lot of internal complexity. A Ziploc bag soak can also work depending on the suppressor type. I tested the suppressor process on a Heresy Design Resonator 22. After treatment, the suppressor ran cleaner. After 500 rounds, it looked like it had only seen a few hundred rounds, and the post-range cleaning process was much easier and faster than previous sessions. For rimfire suppressors, that matters. Rimfire cans get filthy fast. Anything that makes suppressor cleanup easier is worth paying attention to. Another major benefit is the safer, non-toxic positioning. I care about limiting exposure to harsh chemicals. A lot of gun cleaning products work, but they are nasty. If you clean guns in a basement, garage, shop, or small work area, reducing exposure to harsh industrial chemicals matters. Modern Spartan Systems gives you a product line that is safer for the user, safe for the firearm, and still effective. That is the key point. The green technology would not matter much if the products did not work. In this case, they do. Pricing is another strong point. These are not ridiculous $50 bottles of magic gun oil. The prices are fair, practical, and economical. Their kits also make sense because you get the products that work together: Accuracy Oil, Carbon Destroyer, Copper Lead Destroyer, Crystal Clear, and Spartan Accuracy Grease. The shooter kit is probably the easiest way to get into the system because the products are designed to work together. Clean the surface, prep the metal, apply the bonded lubricant, and use grease where heavier staying power is needed. What I appreciate most is that Modern Spartan Systems is not asking you to believe in fairy dust. The science is straightforward: reduce friction, prep the surface, bond the lubricant, and improve consistency. Based on my testing, the products performed exactly the way they were supposed to. Modern Spartan Systems works. It is affordable, safer than many traditional chemical-heavy gun care products, and it delivered real performance in my testing. The Crystal Clear lens cleaner is an easy win, Carbon Destroyer cleaned better than expected, the Accuracy Oil showed measurable accuracy potential, and the Suppressor Shield made rimfire suppressor cleanup easier. For shooters, suppressor owners, hunters, and anyone who takes firearm maintenance seriously, Modern Spartan Systems is worth a hard look. Major Pandemic - MajorPandemic.com is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Thanks for reading Major Pandemic - MajorPandemic.com! This post is public so feel free to share it.

  8. Jun 27

    The Firearms Industry is Going Broke

    This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit www.majorpandemic.com Why the Firearms Industry Is Struggling: The Post-2020 Gun Sales Hangover No One Wants to Talk About SEO Title: Why the Firearms Industry Is Struggling in 2026: Gun Sales, NICS Checks, Inventory Glut & the Post-2020 HangoverMeta Description: The firearms industry is facing one of its toughest downturns in decades as post-2020 demand fades, NICS checks soften, inventory piles up, and manufacturers fight for fewer buyers.Suggested URL Slug: why-firearms-industry-is-struggling-2026Focus Keywords: firearms industry, gun sales, NICS checks, shooting sports industry, firearms market downturn, gun industry sales, firearm manufacturers, gun retailers, suppressor sales, firearms accessories The Firearms Industry Is Not Dead — But It Is Absolutely in Trouble Welcome back to Major Pandemic’s Bunker Bar, where the drinks are cold, the walls are reinforced, and the industry talk is brutally honest. There is no soft way to say this: the firearms industry is struggling right now. Not the Second Amendment. Not gun culture. Not shooting sports as a lifestyle. Those are still alive and well. But the actual business of selling new firearms, moving inventory, keeping manufacturers healthy, and keeping retailers profitable is in one of the roughest spots it has seen in decades. The warning signs are everywhere: slow retail traffic, stacked distributor shelves, manufacturers fighting over the same shrinking demand, and accessory companies wondering where the next wave of customers is supposed to come from. The problem is not that Americans suddenly stopped caring about guns. The problem is that the industry built itself for the boom — and the boom ended. 2020 Was the Peak, Not the New Normal The firearms industry had an unbelievable run in 2020. Between COVID, riots, political uncertainty, personal-security concerns, and first-time buyers flooding the market, gun sales exploded. NICS checks became the easiest public shorthand for that surge. They are not perfect, because a NICS check does not equal one gun sold, and not every firearm purchase requires a new background check. But they are still one of the best indicators of retail firearm demand. The rough trend tells the story: YearEstimated NSSF-Adjusted NICS Checks2019~13.2M2020~21.1M2021~18.5M2022~16.4M2023~15.85M2024~15.24M2025~14.61M2026 est.~14.8M–15.0M That means the industry is down roughly 25% to 30% from the 2020 boom peak based on NICS-driven demand indicators. That is a massive drop. But here is where the story gets more complicated: the broader shooting sports industry can still look strong in dollars while firearm unit demand is clearly down. The Dollar Numbers Can Be Misleading Some people look at the shooting sports industry and say, “What are you talking about? The industry is up. The economic impact is huge.” That is partly true — but it depends which number you are looking at. There are really three different things people mix together: * NICS checks — a proxy for firearm transaction volume. * Firearm-related direct sales/output — closer to actual commercial revenue from firearms, ammo, accessories, retail, and related channels. * Total shooting sports economic impact — the broader economic footprint, including jobs, wages, suppliers, taxes, and downstream spending. Those are not the same thing. A cleaner view looks like this: YearNSSF-Adjusted NICSEst. Firearm-Related Direct Sales/OutputTotal Shooting-Sports / Firearm Industry Economic Impact2019~13.2M~$24B est.~$60.0B2020~21.1M$25.5B$63.5B2021~18.5M$28.4B$70.5B2022~16.4M$32.1B$80.7B202315.85M$33.5B$90.1B202415.24M$34.1B$91.7B2025 est.14.61M~$33B–$34B est.~$90B–$92B est.2026 est.~14.8M–15.0M est.~$34B–$35B est.~$91B–$94B est. This is the heart of the confusion. NICS checks are down. Firearm unit demand is down. But total industry dollars are not down the same way because prices are higher, accessories are still selling, suppressors are hot, training is strong, and the total economic-impact number includes far more than guns sold at retail. So yes, the shooting sports industry can look healthy on a macroeconomic chart while many firearm manufacturers and retailers are getting crushed in the real world. The Industry Overbuilt for a Boom That Did Not Last The biggest mistake was assuming 2020 was a new baseline. It was not. A lot of manufacturers looked at the 2020 surge and expanded production. More machines. More employees. More buildings. More inventory. More SKUs. More everything. Then the wave disappeared. By late 2021, the market had already started normalizing. The panic demand was gone. First-time buyers had made their purchase. Political fear cooled. Retail traffic slowed. But the production capacity was already built. That is how the industry ended up with firearms sitting on manufacturer shelves, distributor shelves, and retailer shelves. Too many guns. Too many similar products. Too many companies chasing too few active buyers. The Used Gun Market Is Also Hurting New Gun Sales Another overlooked issue is the flood of used guns coming back into the market. Older gun owners are selling off collections. Some buyers who entered the market during 2020 are not becoming repeat buyers. Others are trading instead of buying new. That creates a problem for manufacturers: a used gun sale may help a retailer or transfer dealer, but it does not help the manufacturer move new inventory. It also gives budget-conscious buyers an alternative. Instead of buying a new rifle, shotgun, or handgun, they can buy something used, refinish something they already own, or spend money upgrading what is already in the safe. That is one reason services like Cerakote, customization, and gunsmithing can still be busy while new firearm sales struggle. The Generational Problem Is Real The gun industry also has a demographic problem. Boomers already own a lot of firearms. Many are slowing down, selling extras, or becoming more selective. Gen X is probably the strongest remaining repeat-buyer group because they have the income, interest, and practical use cases. But there are not enough Gen X buyers to rescue every manufacturer. Older Millennials are becoming more meaningful buyers, but many are still under pressure from housing costs, inflation, debt, and family expenses. Gen Z has interest, but they are not yet in a position to replace the spending power of Boomers and Gen X. Many are younger, lower-income, more experience-driven, and less likely to be heavy product collectors at this stage. That leaves the industry stuck between an older buyer base that is saturated and younger buyers who are not yet able or willing to spend enough to fill the gap. No Panic Buying Means No Artificial Demand For years, the industry benefited from fear-driven buying cycles. Election years. Regulatory threats. Riots. Magazine bans. Assault weapon ban chatter. Shortages. Supreme Court fights. ATF uncertainty. When people believed they might lose access to certain firearms, they bought immediately. Right now, the environment is different. Many gun owners feel politically safer. They may still care about court cases, executive orders, ATF interpretations, pistol braces, forced reset triggers, suppressors, and NFA reform, but the average buyer is not acting like everything must be purchased today. That is good for constitutional confidence, but bad for panic-driven sales. The industry is learning a hard lesson: you cannot build a healthy long-term business model around people being afraid. Some Categories Are Getting Destroyed While Others Are Still Working The pain is not evenly spread. Traditional AR-15s, standard black rifles, pump shotguns, basic rifles, and commodity products are under heavy pressure. Some categories appear to be down dramatically from the boom years. But other categories still have energy: * Suppressors * Pistol-caliber carbines * Innovative defensive handguns * Premium 2011-style pistols * Custom guns * Cerakote and refinishing * Training * Female-focused shooting accessories * Optics and accessories tied to new platforms The key difference is innovation. The companies doing better are not simply making another version of the same thing everyone else already sells. They are offering a new angle, a premium experience, a specialized product, or something that gives buyers a reason to spend. The “me too” manufacturers are the ones in danger. Suppressors Are Masking Some of the Pain One of the brightest spots right now is suppressors. A lot of disposable firearm dollars are flowing into suppressors because the wait times, tax-stamp discussions, legal momentum, and product innovation have created real demand. For many enthusiasts, suppressors have gone from a rare special purchase to a normal part of the collection. That is great for suppressor manufacturers, dealers, and related accessory companies. But it can also mask the broader problem. Money going into suppressors is not always money going into new rifles, shotguns, handguns, optics, or traditional accessories. Suppressors are helping the industry, but they are not fixing the entire firearms market. Female Shooters Are One of the Strongest Bright Spots The growth of female shooters may be one of the healthiest long-term trends in the shooting sports industry. Female buyers often approach purchasing differently. Instead of simply buying a gun and figuring out the rest later, many think in terms of the whole solution: firearm, carry method, storage, training, accessories, range comfort, safety, confidence, and personal fit. That creates strong opportunities across accessories, education, apparel, bags, holsters, optics, and training. This is one reason the broader shooting sports market can remain healthier than the pure firearm-sales market. New shooters do not only buy guns. They buy the ecosystem. Why Accessory Companies Are at Risk Accessory companies tied directl

See All (112)

About

A blend of entertainment, survival, hunting outdoors and gun reviews. www.majorpandemic.com

Information

You Might Also Like