Hot Takes on the Classics

Emily Maeda & Tim McIntosh
  • 4.9 (41)
  • Books
  • Biweekly

Hot Takes on the Classics is no dusty, academic approach to great books. It’s a gossipy, exciting discussion about the best literature ever written. Hosted by Tim and Emily, who are veteran teachers and long-time friends, Hot Takes is packed with playful debate, meaningful speculation, and hearty laughs.

  1. 4d ago

    Episode 14: Babette’s Feast: The Artist At Work - Isak Dinesen

    In this episode of Hot Takes on the Classics, Tim McIntosh and Emily Maeda explore Isak Dinesen’s “Babette’s Feast,” a story about beauty, sacrifice, holiness, and the demanding vocation of the artist. In a quiet Norwegian religious community shaped by austerity, Babette arrives as a refugee and spends twelve years serving two aging sisters before using her entire lottery fortune to prepare one magnificent French feast. Tim and Emily consider how the meal restores memory, fellowship, delight, and spiritual vision to the community, and how Babette brings material beauty and spiritual devotion together rather than setting them against one another. The episode closes by considering the artist as a formidable figure whose devotion to a vision can require radical sacrifice. Episode Outline Adulthood, middle age, and Aristotle’s picture of maturity between youthful rashness and old ageIsak Dinesen, the Scandinavian setting, and the story’s life in fiction, film, and theaterMartine and Philippa, the Dean’s religious community, and a sincere holiness shaped by austerity and renunciationLorenz Loewenhielm and Achille Papin as two encounters with beauty, love, music, and unrealized possibilityBabette’s arrival from France after the Paris Commune and her twelve years of quiet service in BerlevaagThe lottery fortune and Babette’s request to prepare a French feast for the centenary of the Dean’s birthThe feast as a transformation of the community from pettiness, old grievances, and restraint toward memory, joy, and reconciliationGeneral Loewenhielm’s recognition of the meal and his renewed encounter with the spiritual vision awakened in his youthBabette’s revelation that she spent all ten thousand francs and that she is a great artist who created the feast also for herselfThe artist at work: beauty as vocation, artistic vision as demanding discipline, and the union of material delight with spiritual realityKey Topics & Takeaways Holiness and Earthly Beauty: The story begins with a community that associates holiness with refusal, restraint, and the negation of earthly desire. The feast does not simply reject their devotion. Instead, it reveals that beauty, pleasure, food, memory, and fellowship can participate in spiritual life rather than compete with it.Piety, Pettiness, and Renewal: After the Dean’s death, the community retains the forms of its religious life but begins to lose the charity that once animated them. Babette’s feast loosens old resentments and allows the guests to remember why they loved one another before their disagreements hardened.The Artist as Giver and Maker: Babette’s sacrifice is generous, but she refuses to describe the feast only as an act of service to others. She spends her fortune because she is an artist and needs to create something worthy of her powers. Her gift to the community and her fulfillment as an artist are inseparable.Beauty as Transformation: Martine’s beauty, Philippa’s voice, and Babette’s cooking repeatedly awaken people to realities they had forgotten or resisted. Beauty does not merely decorate life in the story. It changes desire, calls people beyond themselves, and opens possibilities for conversion and reconciliation.Questions & Discussion Does Babette’s feast correct the sisters’ spirituality or complete it?Consider whether Dinesen presents austerity and renunciation as mistaken, or whether Babette supplies a missing dimension of beauty, embodiment, and delight that allows their genuine devotion to become more fully human.Why does the feast heal the community when argument and moral effort have not?Discuss how taste, memory, music, wine, conversation, and shared pleasure work beneath the guests’ conscious resistance and restore their ability to forgive and enjoy one another.Why is General Loewenhielm important to the meaning of the feast?Explore how his recognition of Babette’s artistry connects the remote Norwegian village to Paris and how the meal reawakens the spiritual longing first stirred by Martine decades earlier.What does Babette mean when she says she made the feast for herself?Ask how artistic creation can be both self fulfillment and gift. Does her statement make the feast less sacrificial, or does it reveal a deeper understanding of vocation and generosity?Why does the episode describe the true artist as formidable?Consider the comparison with Dorothy L. Sayers and the idea that an artist may endure deprivation, misunderstanding, and conflict in order to remain faithful to a vision of what is true and beautiful.Suggested Reading & Resources Babette’s Feast by Isak Dinesen translated by Karen BlixenOut of Africa by Isak Dinesen translated by Karen BlixenThe Unsolved Puzzle of the Man with No Face by Dorothy L. SayersFrank Mahilich and New Threads TheaterClassical Learning TestMy Name is Søren Kierkegaard by Tim McIntoshDevotchkaSubstack Instagram

  2. Sep 29

    Episode 13: Sonny’s Blues by James Baldwin: Music as Life

    In this episode of Hot Takes on the Classics, Tim McIntosh and Emily Maeda explore James Baldwin’s “Sonny’s Blues,” a story about two brothers trying to understand one another across the distance created by responsibility, suffering, addiction, and art. They discuss Baldwin’s lyrical prose, his Harlem upbringing and life in Paris, the tension between the older brother’s dutiful path and Sonny’s vocation as a jazz musician, and the way music gives form to experiences that ordinary speech cannot contain. The episode culminates in the jazz-club scene, where listening becomes an act of recognition and the narrator finally begins to understand why music is necessary to Sonny’s life. Episode Outline Adulthood as the season of responsibility, consequence, restraint, and accumulated burdensJames Baldwin’s family background, early preaching, literary vocation, experiences of racism, and years in ParisBaldwin’s lyrical prose: metaphor, rhythm, juxtaposed images, and writing that unfolds with a musical qualityThe story’s opening shock: Sonny’s arrest for using and selling heroin and the narrator’s attempt to understand his brotherHarlem, inherited suffering, and the older generation’s effort to shelter children from burdens they will eventually have to carryThe older brother as teacher, husband, father, and responsible provider versus Sonny as sensitive dreamer and aspiring musicianClassical music and jazz as contrasting images of structure, improvisation, establishment, and artistic freedomThe brothers’ conflict as a struggle between the call of duty and the call of beautyAddiction, intoxication, and music as different attempts to escape, endure, or transform sufferingSonny’s return, his invitation to the jazz club, and the older brother’s willingness at last to listenThe final performance: jazz as communal creation, triumph over suffering, and a language beyond wordsThe episode’s closing interpretation of Sonny as a returning younger brother and its comparisons with A River Runs Through It, It’s a Wonderful Life, and biblical sibling storiesKey Topics & Takeaways Music as Life and Order: Baldwin presents music as more than entertainment. Sonny’s playing gives shape to suffering and draws something ordered and communicable out of experiences that otherwise threaten to remain chaotic, private, or destructive.Responsibility and Beauty: The brothers embody different responses to adulthood. The narrator chooses duty, stability, work, and family; Sonny is drawn toward artistic freedom and beauty. The story refuses to make either impulse sufficient by itself and instead exposes the resentment and incomprehension that arise when each brother judges the other’s path.Listening as Reconciliation: The narrator spends much of the story trying to manage, correct, or interpret Sonny. Only when he enters Sonny’s world and listens to him play does he begin to understand what Sonny has been trying to say and why music is necessary to him.Addiction and Counterfeit Transcendence: The discussion contrasts the “flow” of musical performance with the altered states sought through drugs or alcohol. Sonny’s art becomes a way of facing and transforming pain rather than merely escaping it, even though his history of addiction remains part of what gives the performance its urgency.Inherited Suffering and Adult Burden: Baldwin places the brothers within a family, neighborhood, and racial history larger than either of them. Adulthood means receiving burdens from the past and deciding whether those burdens will be repeated, resisted, carried for others, or transformed into something new.Questions & Discussion Why does the older brother have such difficulty understanding Sonny?Consider how responsibility, fear, judgment, jealousy, and genuine love become entangled in his attempts to protect his younger brother.What can Sonny communicate through music that he cannot communicate directly in conversation?Discuss Baldwin’s idea that music can impose order on experiences too deep or painful for ordinary words and can make private suffering intelligible to other people.Is the conflict between the “call of duty” and the “call of beauty” a genuine opposition?Ask whether the brothers represent incompatible ways of living or whether the story ultimately suggests that responsibility and beauty need one another.How does Baldwin make the prose itself feel musical?Look at rhythm, repetition, metaphor, shifts in memory, and the story’s movement toward the final performance. Consider how form reinforces the story’s subject.What changes when the narrator finally hears Sonny play?Explore whether the climactic performance produces forgiveness, admiration, grief, understanding, or some combination of these, and why listening succeeds where advice and control have failed.Suggested Reading & Resources Sonny’s Blues by James BaldwinNotes of a Native Son by James BaldwinJames Baldwin: The Last Interview: and other Conversations by James BaldwinA River Runs Through It by Norman MacleanIt’s a Wonderful Life a film directed by Frank CapraThe Parable of the Prodigal Son: Luke 15:11–32Mary and Martha: Luke 10:38–42 Works by Zora Neale HurstonHemingway: The Paris Years by Michael S. ReynoldsThe Christopher Perrin ShowMy Name is Søren Kierkegaard by Tim McIntoshDevotchkaSubstack Instagram

  3. Sep 22

    Episode 12: Hills Like White Elephants — Ernest Hemingway

    In this episode of Hot Takes on the Classics, Tim McIntosh and Emily Maeda explore Ernest Hemingway’s “Hills Like White Elephants,” a story in which the most important subject is never named. At a Spanish train station, an American man and a young woman called Jig wait for a train to Madrid while circling around a “simple operation” that will determine the future of their relationship. Tim and Emily discuss Hemingway’s iceberg theory, the story’s compressed setting and dialogue, the unequal pressure between the couple, and the way Jig sees possibility where the man sees a threat to freedom. They close with Tim’s Hot Take and a discussion of what the story reveals about the difficult passage from adolescence into adulthood. Episode Outline “Hills Like White Elephants” as a difficult bridge from adolescence into adulthoodWhy the story is best encountered before the reader knows what the couple is discussingHemingway in Paris in 1927: rising fame, The Sun Also Rises, Hadley Richardson, and Pauline PfeifferA radically compressed story: one train station, two central characters, and almost nothing but dialogueThe unnamed pregnancy and abortion and Hemingway’s iceberg theory of omissionJig, “the girl,” and “the American”: naming, age, and the unequal pressure within the conversationThe white elephant image, the surrounding landscape, and Jig’s attentiveness to the worldThe train station as a liminal setting and the approaching train to Madrid as a deadline for decisionThe couple’s sticker covered suitcases and a life of travel, mobility, and limited responsibilityThe child as possibility for Jig and as a threat to freedom for the manHemingway’s biography, the temptation to read the story autobiographically, and the likely future of the relationshipKey Topics & Takeaways The Iceberg Theory and the Unspoken Center: The story never uses the words “baby,” “pregnant,” or “abortion.” Hemingway leaves the decisive reality beneath the surface, forcing the reader to infer it from pressure, repetition, gesture, and what the characters avoid saying.Power and Persuasion: The conversation is not simply a balanced exchange between two people weighing options. The man repeatedly reassures, minimizes, and pushes, while Jig keeps asking whether doing what he wants will restore the relationship they once had. The imbalance becomes part of the story’s emotional force.Liminal Space and a Closing Deadline: The train station holds the couple between places and between possible futures. Madrid is approaching with the train, so a story in which almost nothing physically happens nevertheless carries the pressure of an imminent decision.Freedom, Responsibility, and Adulthood: The couple’s luggage records a mobile life of travel and relative freedom. The pregnancy introduces a responsibility that cannot be treated as another destination, and the episode uses that conflict to mark a harsh transition from youthful freedom toward adulthood.Perception and Possibility: Jig notices hills, landscape, and possible futures; the man narrows his attention to one desired outcome. Their different ways of seeing expose how far apart they already are and why returning to the relationship “as it was” may no longer be possible.Questions & Discussion Why does Hemingway refuse to name the procedure directly?Consider what the omission requires from the reader and how the story would change if the central subject were stated plainly.How does the train station shape the drama?Discuss the importance of waiting, transit, limited time, and the knowledge that the train to Madrid is carrying the couple toward a decision.How much freedom does Jig actually have in the conversation?Look closely at the man’s reassurances, repetitions, and promises. When does persuasion become pressure, and how does the story communicate that distinction without explaining it?What do you think happens after the story ends?Consider whether the couple proceeds with the operation, whether the relationship survives, and whether the story gives enough evidence to favor one future or deliberately leaves the choice unresolved.Suggested Reading & Resources Hills Like White Elephants by Ernest HemingwayThe Sun Also Rises by Ernest HemingwayErnest Hemingway: A Biography by Mary V. DearbornHemingway: The Paris Years by Michael S. ReynoldsWhere Are You Going? Where Have You Been? by Joyce Carol OatesShort stories by Flannery O’ConnorThe Christopher Perrin ShowMy Name is Søren Kierkegaard by Tim McIntoshDevotchkaSubstack Instagram

  4. Sep 15

    Episode 11: Everything That Rises Must Converge: Coming Together May be Harder than it Seems - Flannery O’Connor

    In this episode of Hot Takes on the Classics, Tim McIntosh and Emily Maeda explore Flannery O’Connor’s “Everything That Rises Must Converge,” a story of young adulthood, race, pride, dependence, and painful moral awakening. Set largely on a city bus, the story brings Julian, a self-consciously progressive college graduate, into collision with his cheerful but deeply prejudiced mother as the changing South forces people who would rather remain separate into uncomfortable proximity. Along the way, Tim and Emily consider O’Connor’s grotesque humor, her idea of dark grace, the story’s title from Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, and the devastating moment when Julian’s superiority gives way to guilt and sorrow. Episode Outline Young adulthood and the idea that adulthood begins when other people can depend on youThe bus as a confined social space where strangers, classes, and racial tensions are forced togetherFlannery O’Connor’s Georgia upbringing, Iowa Writers’ Workshop years, illness, and return to AndalusiaO’Connor’s mastery of the short story, grotesque imagery, and moments of “dark grace”Recurring O’Connor figures: dependent mothers, educated young adults, racial conflict, and moral self-deceptionPierre Teilhard de Chardin and the phrase “everything that rises must converge”Julian as an educated, progressive, frustrated young writer who still depends on his motherJulian’s mother as cheerful, sacrificial, socially proud, and deeply shaped by racist assumptionsThe extravagant hat as a symbol of distinction that unexpectedly reveals common humanityJulian’s performative solidarity on the integrated bus and his mother’s condescending friendlinessThe matching hats, the penny, the blow from the purse, and the story’s violent moment of convergenceJulian’s final dark grace: the collapse of superiority and his entry into “the world of guilt and sorrow”Key Topics & Takeaways Adulthood as Dependability: Julian has graduated from college and thinks of himself as intellectually mature, yet he still lives with and depends upon the mother he treats with contempt. The episode’s opening definition of adulthood shifts attention from independence alone to becoming someone on whom others can depend.Convergence and Common Humanity: The bus, the shared stop, and especially the identical hats repeatedly collapse the distinctions the characters try to preserve. O’Connor turns Teilhard de Chardin’s hopeful image of convergence into a painful encounter with the fact that human beings share a nature even when social habits, prejudice, and resentment keep them apart.Prejudice and Performative Progressivism: Julian correctly recognizes the injustice of his mother’s racism, but his own moral posture is compromised by vanity and resentment. Sitting beside a Black passenger becomes partly a performance aimed at humiliating his mother rather than an act of genuine friendship or solidarity.Dark Grace: O’Connor’s moments of grace are not soothing. They arrive through shock, humiliation, violence, or loss. Julian’s awakening comes only when his mother collapses and the categories through which he has judged her are overwhelmed by the reality that he may be losing her.O’Connor’s Unsparing Moral Vision: The story refuses to let either the progressive son or the traditional mother hide behind the right ideas, social manners, or inherited identities. As Tim and Emily observe, O’Connor’s moral imagination subjects everyone to judgment, including positions and weaknesses she may have recognized in herself.Questions & Discussion Is Julian actually more mature than his mother?Compare his education, political awareness, dependence, resentment, and treatment of his mother with the episode’s definition of adulthood as becoming someone others can depend upon.Why is the bus such an effective setting for the story?Consider how a bus removes control over who shares one’s space and forces racial, class, generational, and personal differences into physical proximity.What does the matching hat reveal?Discuss how the hat begins as the mother’s attempt to appear distinctive and becomes a visual sign that the people she places beneath herself are not as separate from her as she imagines.How does O’Connor transform Teilhard de Chardin’s idea that “everything that rises must converge”?Explore the difference between an uplifting vision of spiritual convergence and the painful, humiliating, even violent convergence that occurs in the story.What is Julian’s moment of dark grace?Consider whether the ending represents punishment, awakening, the beginning of repentance, or all three as Julian enters what O’Connor calls “the world of guilt and sorrow.”Suggested Reading & Resources Wise Blood by Flannery O’ConnorA Good Man Is Hard to Find by Flannery O’ConnorGood Country People by Flannery O’ConnorParker’s Back by Flannery O’ConnorThe Sound and the Fury by William FaulknerThe Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock by T. S. Eliot“Faith in Man,” in The Future of Man by Pierre Teilhard de ChardinThe Habit of Being: Letters of Flannery O’Connor edited by Sally FitzgeraldIowa Writers’ Workshop - O’Connor’s graduate writing programAndalusia Farm - Flannery O’Connor’s home in Milledgeville, GeorgiaMy Name is Søren Kierkegaard by Tim McIntoshDevotchkaSubstack Instagram

  5. Sep 8

    Episode 10: “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock”: Anxiety, Modernism, and a Life Deferred — T. S. Eliot

    In this episode of Hot Takes on the Classics, Tim McIntosh and Emily Maeda explore T. S. Eliot’s “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock,” a poem that captures the uncertainty and self-consciousness of adolescence and early adulthood. They consider Prufrock’s anxious journey through the modern city, his inability to act or speak decisively, and Eliot’s use of jarring images, near rhymes, and the dramatic monologue to make interior experience visible. Along the way, Tim and Emily discuss why modernist writers broke with inherited forms, how Eliot remained deeply engaged with the tradition he challenged, and why Prufrock’s fear of embarrassment, wasted possibility, and an ordinary adult life remains so recognizable. Episode Outline T. S. Eliot’s American origins, Anglophilia, move to Britain, and conversion to Anglicanism“Prufrock” as a poem of adolescence, young adulthood, and the fear of never fully becoming youngEliot’s argument that modern writers must force and dislocate language to represent modern experienceModernism’s challenge to inherited artistic forms without necessarily abandoning the tradition behind themThe opening image of the evening sky as a patient “etherized upon a table”Eliot’s unusual similes and the “objective correlative” as a way of making interior experience concretePrufrock’s journey into the city and the repeated frustration of expectations for romance, conversation, and possibilityThe dramatic monologue tradition inherited from Robert Browning and Eliot’s reversal of its confident speakerEquivocation, social anxiety, near rhyme, and Prufrock’s repeated inability to “dare”The unanswered “you,” the unasked “overwhelming question,” and the poem’s atmosphere of paralysisThe poem’s three movements from invitation, to social paralysis, to longing for mythic grandeur“Prufrock” as an early expression of modernism and the broader conflict between inherited form and a rapidly changing worldKey Topics & Takeaways Young Adulthood and Social Paralysis: Prufrock embodies the acute self-consciousness of early adulthood, when social situations seem full of possibility but every word and action can also feel subject to judgment. His endless qualifications and hesitations turn ordinary social encounters into moments of existential anxiety.Breaking Form from Within the Tradition: Eliot challenges conventional poetic language because inherited expressions seem inadequate to modern experience. Yet Tim and Emily emphasize that Eliot knows, values, and remains in conversation with the classical forms he disrupts rather than simply discarding the past.Making the Interior World Visible: Images such as the etherized patient and the yellow fog translate Prufrock’s inward condition into physical images. The discussion of Eliot’s “objective correlative” centers on art’s ability to make an intangible emotional state present through concrete realities.A Life of Deferral: Coffee spoons, drawing rooms, repeated questions, and Prufrock’s continual “Do I dare?” create the sense of a life measured out in small acts rather than decisive commitments. The poem’s tragedy lies not primarily in catastrophe but in possibility continually postponed.Modernism and the Loss of Certainty: Eliot’s poem belongs to a larger cultural moment in which artistic forms, social hierarchies, and inherited ways of seeing were being unsettled. Modernist experimentation becomes not merely stylistic novelty but an attempt to find forms capable of expressing a fragmented modern world.Questions & Discussion Why is Prufrock unable to act decisively?Consider whether his paralysis comes primarily from insecurity, fear of judgment, excessive self-awareness, dissatisfaction with his social world, or some combination of all four.Who is the “you” in “Let us go then, you and I”?Explore the possibilities raised in the episode: a romantic companion, a friend, the reader, or Prufrock speaking encouragingly to himself. How does each interpretation change the poem?What is Prufrock’s “overwhelming question”?Discuss why Eliot never states it directly and whether the unanswered question concerns love, meaning, purpose, identity, or the courage to participate fully in life.Why does Eliot deliberately make some of the poem’s images and rhymes feel slightly “off”?Consider how the etherized patient, the yellow fog, and near rhymes create beauty while also reproducing Prufrock’s discomfort and the dislocation of modern life.Can breaking an inherited artistic form actually help preserve a tradition?Reflect on Tim and Emily’s discussion of Eliot as a writer who disrupts conventional forms because he knows and values them. What distinguishes creative renewal from simply abandoning the past?Suggested Reading & Resources The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock by T. S. EliotThe Waste Land by T. S. Eliot“Banquet Speech” by T. S. Eliot, Nobel Prize, 1948 Nobel Prize banquet speech by T. S. EliotThe Use of Poetry and the Use of Criticism by T. S. EliotThe Book of Nature: Wordsworth's Poetry on Nature by William WordsworthHowards End by E. M. ForsterMy Last Duchess by Robert BrowningFinnegans Wake by James JoyceSold a Story podcast by Emily HanfordMy Name is Søren Kierkegaard by Tim McIntoshDevotchkaSubstack Instagram

  6. Sep 1

    Episode 9: Trilogy: Three Stories of One Love - Jon Fosse

    In this episode of Hot Takes on the Classics, Tim McIntosh and Emily Maeda explore Jon Fosse’s Trilogy, the work of a Norwegian novelist and playwright whose spare, musical prose gives voice to experiences that resist ordinary explanation. Focusing primarily on “Wakefulness,” they follow the young lovers Asle and Alida as they wander through cold and rain searching for shelter before the birth of their child, while memories of music, love, rejection, and the past flow through the present. Along the way, Tim and Emily consider Fosse’s use of repetition and stream of consciousness, the story’s echoes of the Nativity, the self-giving character of young love, and the way his writing holds together harsh physical realities with a sense of mystery and transcendence. Episode Outline Jon Fosse’s international reputation as a novelist and playwright and his 2023 Nobel PrizeFosse’s use of Nynorsk and the cultural and linguistic world of western NorwayTrilogy and its three parts: “Wakefulness,” “Olav’s Dreams,” and “Weariness”Asle and Alida as young, unmarried lovers searching for shelter before the birth of their childBiblical and Nativity echoes in the couple’s wandering, rejection, and need for a homeFosse’s fluid treatment of memory, present experience, dreams, and indeterminate timeMusic as the language through which Asle and Alida first recognize their loveSelf-giving love and the couple’s devotion to the good of one anotherThe arrival of their son Sigvald and the temporary resolution at the end of “Wakefulness”Repetition, limited punctuation, and the musical rhythm of Fosse’s proseThe fiddle as a symbol linking love, music, family, and generations across the trilogyFosse’s religious background, Catholic conversion, and combination of bleak reality with transcendenceKey Topics & Takeaways Giving Voice to the Unsayable: Fosse’s prose attempts to express experiences that ordinary analytical language cannot fully capture. Music, love, memory, grief, and religious mystery are communicated through rhythm, repetition, and image rather than extensive explanation.Love as Self-Gift: Asle and Alida’s relationship is presented as more than youthful attraction. Each recognizes love through an increasing concern for the other, and Asle explicitly understands his love through the fact that he thinks more about Alida than about himself.Time, Memory, and Myth: Fosse allows present action, memory, and interior experience to move into one another without clear boundaries. The uncertain historical setting also gives the couple’s story a mythic quality, allowing their search for shelter to resonate with the story of the Holy Family without becoming a simple allegory.Prose as Music: Repetition functions like a musical refrain, creating a continuous forward movement that Emily compares to the Baroque principle of Fortspinnung, or “spinning forth.” The effect is cumulative rather than episodic, with resolution arriving only after sustained rhythmic movement.The Physical and the Transcendent: Fosse keeps his characters rooted in hunger, cold, exhaustion, pregnancy, shelter, and bodily need while simultaneously opening those experiences toward love, beauty, religious symbolism, and transcendence.Questions & Discussion Why does Fosse leave the time period of “Wakefulness” so difficult to determine?Consider how the absence of precise historical markers changes the story from a realistic account of one young couple into something more universal or mythic.What does music allow Asle and Alida to understand about one another?Discuss why Fosse associates their discovery of love with the experience of hearing and creating music rather than with explanation or conversation.How does Fosse’s repetition affect the experience of reading the story?Consider Emily’s comparison to musical refrains and Fortspinnung. Does repetition slow the story down, propel it forward, or accomplish both at once?In what sense does the story resemble the Nativity without functioning as a direct retelling?Reflect on the young couple, the imminent birth, their exclusion from respectable society, and their inability to find shelter.What makes Asle and Alida’s love different from simple romantic desire?Consider the episode’s emphasis on self-offering, responsibility, suffering, and each character’s concern for the good of the other.Suggested Reading & Resources Trilogy by Jon Fosse“Nobel Lecture” by Jon Fosse, Nobel Prize, 2023 Nobel Lecture by Jon FosseThe Bible, the Nativity narrative, Luke 2:1-21 Brandenburg Concertos by Johann Sebastian BachBabette’s Feast by Isak DinesenMy Name is Søren Kierkegaard by Tim McIntoshDevotchkaSubstack InstagramVisit TrueNorth.fm

  7. Aug 25

    Episode 8: "Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?”: Questions Can Lead You Astray by Joyce Carol Oates

    In this episode of Hot Takes on the Classics, Tim McIntosh and Emily Maeda enter the teen years with Joyce Carol Oates’s “Where Are You Going? Where Have You Been?,” a terrifying story in which almost nothing violent happens on the page. They follow fifteen-year-old Connie from a restless family life and flirtation at a drive-in to a long, increasingly threatening conversation with Arnold Friend at her screen door. Along the way, they discuss Bob Dylan’s influence on the story, Oates’s use of ordinary suburban details to create dread, the dynamics of grooming and seduction, and the ways Connie’s hunger for attention leaves her vulnerable to someone who seems to know far more about her than he should. Episode Outline Adolescence as a life stage caught between childhood and adulthoodBob Dylan’s influence on the story and “It’s All Over Now, Baby Blue”How Oates creates terror through an ordinary suburban setting rather than overt violenceConnie’s family life, restlessness, appearance, and desire for attentionThe drive-in encounter with Arnold Friend and his first unsettling promiseArnold’s arrival while Connie is home alone and the screen door as the story’s boundaryArnold’s escalating manipulation, intimate knowledge, and insistence that Connie will leave with himThe uncanny appearance, movements, slang, and shifting voices of Arnold Friend and EllieThe story as a realistic account of sexual predation and groomingCultural expectations, feminine vulnerability, and comparison with “Hills Like White Elephants”Clues that Arnold Friend may represent something more than an ordinary human predatorComparisons with Flannery O’Connor and closing questions about evil, family, and modern vulnerabilityKey Topics & Takeaways Adolescence Between Worlds: Connie is neither fully a child nor fully an adult, and Oates makes that instability central to both her longing for independence and her vulnerability to danger.The Terror of the Ordinary: The story needs no explicit violence to become frightening; a driveway, a screen door, a family barbecue, and an ordinary summer afternoon become the setting for escalating dread.Grooming Through Attention and Certainty: Arnold first approaches Connie in the language of flirtation and romance, then steadily replaces invitation with inevitability, using knowledge, confidence, and implied threats to narrow her sense of choice.Desire and Vulnerability: Connie has learned to seek affirmation through appearance and male attention, and Arnold exploits desires that are real even when the cultural forces surrounding them are debated.Human or Supernatural Evil: Arnold can be read as a terrifyingly ordinary predator, but his strange appearance, uncanny knowledge, incantatory speech, and refusal to cross the threshold also leave open a more supernatural interpretation.Questions & Discussion Why is the story so frightening when almost nothing violent happens on the page?Consider how Oates uses ordinary details, implied threat, repetition, and the slow loss of Connie’s control to create fear.How does Connie’s position between childhood and adulthood make her vulnerable?Reflect on her desire to be seen as mature, her dependence on attention, and the moments when she still reacts like a child.Is Arnold Friend best understood as an ordinary predator or as something supernatural?Examine his uncanny knowledge, strange physical details, shifting voice, incantatory language, and reluctance to enter the house.How much responsibility does Connie’s family bear for what happens?Discuss the emotional distance of her father, the conflict with her mother, and whether greater parental attention could have protected Connie from Arnold’s manipulation.Does the story feel more frightening or instructive in 1966 or today?Consider how contemporary forms of impersonation, digital intimacy, and AI-mediated relationships might change the way a modern teenager reads Arnold Friend.Suggested Reading & Resources 'Where Are You Going, Where Have You Been?': Joyce Carol Oates“It’s All Over Now, Baby Blue” by Bob Dylan“Mr. Tambourine Man” by Bob Dylan“Man in the Long Black Coat” by Bob DylanBeat poetry and the Beat Generation edited by Ann Charters“Good Country People” by Flannery O’Connor“Hills Like White Elephants” by Ernest HemingwayThe Guardian interview on an AI-chatbot relationship and financial ruinMy Name is Søren Kierkegaard by Tim McIntoshDevotchkaSubstack Instagram

  8. Aug 18

    Episode 7: The Little Prince: Philosophy and Foxes - Antoine de Saint-Exupéry

    In this episode of Hot Takes on the Classics, Tim McIntosh and Emily Maeda close their exploration of childhood with Antoine de Saint-Exupéry’s The Little Prince. Part children’s story, part fairy tale, and part philosophical meditation, the book asks readers to recover a childlike capacity for wonder without confusing innocence with naïveté. From the Little Prince’s encounters with kings, businessmen, lamplighters, and geographers to his friendship with the fox and devotion to his rose, Tim and Emily explore how relationships, rituals, responsibility, and attention reveal what matters most. Episode Outline The Little Prince as a book equally capable of delighting children and adultsSaint-Exupéry’s illustrations and the contrast between childhood imagination and adult seriousnessSaint-Exupéry’s experiences as a pilot and the Sahara Desert settingThe Little Prince’s planet, his rose, the baobab trees, and his love of sunsetsEncounters with the king, vain man, drunkard, businessman, lamplighter, and geographerRitual, repetition, and the ability to delight in ordinary thingsThe fox, “taming,” and the bonds created through love and responsibilityThe discovery that what is essential cannot simply be seenInnocence without naïveté and the child’s capacity for wonderThe Little Prince as a starting point for philosophical reflectionKey Topics & Takeaways Childhood and Wonder: The Little Prince sees the world without the layers of seriousness that prevent adults from recognizing its mystery and delight.Ritual and Repetition: Repeated actions can deepen rather than diminish experience, allowing ordinary things to become meaningful.Love Creates Responsibility: The Little Prince discovers that his rose matters because he has cared for her; relationship transforms something ordinary into something unique.The Invisible and Essential: The fox’s wisdom points beyond a purely material understanding of reality toward truths perceived through relationship, affection, and the heart.Innocence Without Naïveté: Saint-Exupéry captures childhood as a way of seeing reality clearly rather than simply knowing less than adults.Questions & Discussion What do children see that adults often fail to notice?Consider how the opening drawings and the Little Prince’s questions expose the limitations of an overly “serious” adult perspective.How can repetition deepen our experience of ordinary life?Reflect on the books repeated sunsets and the episode’s discussion of ritual as a way of inhabiting time more fully.Why does caring for the rose make her unique to the Little Prince?Discuss how responsibility, attention, and sacrifice create bonds that cannot be explained simply by preference or usefulness.What does the fox mean when he teaches that what is essential is invisible to the eyes?Consider how friendship, love, and meaning challenge a purely material or measurable understanding of reality.Can The Little Prince function as a work of philosophy as well as a children’s book?Explore how its characters and episodes invite philosophical reflection without reducing the story to an argument or lesson.Suggested Reading & Resources The Little Prince by Antoine de Saint-Exupéry“Ode: Intimations of Immortality” by William WordsworthThe Chronicles of Narnia by C. S. LewisFear and Trembling/Repetition by Søren KierkegaardThe Tao of Pooh by Benjamin HoffThe Turn of the Screw by Henry James“Barn Burning” by William FaulknerMy Name is Søren Kierkegaard by Tim McIntoshDevotchkaSubstack Instagram

See All (62)

Trailer

4.9
out of 5
41 Ratings

About

Hot Takes on the Classics is no dusty, academic approach to great books. It’s a gossipy, exciting discussion about the best literature ever written. Hosted by Tim and Emily, who are veteran teachers and long-time friends, Hot Takes is packed with playful debate, meaningful speculation, and hearty laughs.

Information

  • Creator
    Emily Maeda & Tim McIntosh
  • Years Active
    2024 - 2026
  • Episodes
    62
  • Rating
    Clean
  • Copyright
    ©TrueNorth.fm
  • Show Website
    Hot Takes on the Classics

You Might Also Like