Hot Takes on the Classics

Emily Maeda & Tim McIntosh

Hot Takes on the Classics is no dusty, academic approach to great books. It’s a gossipy, exciting discussion about the best literature ever written. Hosted by Tim and Emily, who are veteran teachers and long-time friends, Hot Takes is packed with playful debate, meaningful speculation, and hearty laughs.

  1. 2D AGO

    Episode 24: Favorite Reads of 2025

    Description In this special year-end episode of Hot Takes on the Classics, Tim McIntosh and Emily Maeda share their five favorite reads of 2025. Moving from plays and poetry to memoir, philosophy, theology, neuroscience, and historical fiction, they reflect on the books that most shaped their thinking this year. Along the way, they discuss stage design and historical drama, political memoir, levitating saints and historiography, divided brain theory, mystical theology, and poetic devotion. They also ask an intriguing question: Which of these contemporary works might endure as future classics? The episode closes with a preview of next season’s theme—short narratives exploring the milestones of human life. Episode Outline Introduction to the “Top Five Reads of 2025” formatDiscussion of the “Top Five Reads of 2025”Preview of next season: short stories and short narratives across the arc of lifeKey Topics & Takeaways Literature and Performance Across Time: The Lehman Trilogy demonstrates how stagecraft and direction can elevate historical narrative into sweeping theatrical art, while Herbert’s The Temple shows how poetry functions as an architectural whole rather than isolated lyrics.Autobiography vs. Memoir: Dorothy Day’s A Long Loneliness offers a straightforward recounting of lived experience, in contrast to more literary memoirs like Augustine’s Confessions. The distinction between recounting and artistic shaping becomes part of the interpretive conversation.Mysticism and the Limits of Modern Materialism: Carlos Eire’s They Flew challenges historians to take seriously supernatural claims recorded in early modern sources, raising questions about empiricism, testimony, and belief.The Divided Brain and Cultural Imbalance: Ian McGilchrist’s The Master and His Emissary and The Matter with Things argue that Western culture overprivileges left-hemisphere abstraction at the expense of right-hemisphere wholeness, intuition, and poetic knowledge.Devotion and Incarnation: Simone Weil’s Waiting on God and George Herbert’s The Temple exemplify deeply incarnational spiritual writing—faith expressed through attention, humility, and beauty.The Question of the “Future Classic”: Throughout the episode, the hosts consider which of their contemporary selections might endure. While older works like Kierkegaard and Herbert are already canonical, authors like Franzen, Fosse, and McGilchrist raise the question of long-term literary legacy.Questions & Discussion What makes a book feel “classic” rather than merely contemporary?Consider whether clarity of moral vision, stylistic excellence, cultural influence, or thematic universality determines lasting status.How does rereading change a book’s power?Reflect on whether returning to a familiar text (like The Temple) reveals layers missed in earlier readings.Is intuition a legitimate form of knowledge?Drawing from McGilchrist’s work, consider how intuition functions in your own decision-making and whether it can be trusted.Can contemporary fiction capture generational change convincingly?Discuss whether multi-generational novels like Crossroads can successfully portray cultural shifts across decades.Which of these books do you think will still be read 100 years from now?Identify one title from this episode and defend its potential longevity.Suggested Reading & Resources DevotchkaThe Lehman Trilogy by Stefano MassiniCrossroads by Jonathan FranzenThe Sickness Unto Death by Søren KierkegaardTrilogy by Jon FosseWaiting for God by Simone WeilThe Temple by George HerbertThe Long Loneliness by Dorothy DayThey Flew: A History of the Impossible by Carlos EireThe Master and His Emissary by Ian McGilchristThe Matter with Things by Ian McGilchristThe Life You Save May Be Your Own by Paul Elie The League of the LexiconClassical Academic Press

    32 min
  2. FEB 10

    Episode 23: What We Learned About Love

    Description In this penultimate episode of Hot Takes on the Classics’ season on love, Emily Maeda and Tim McIntosh step back to reflect on what a sustained engagement with classic texts has revealed about love itself. Drawing on philosophy, novels, poetry, and plays explored throughout the season, they consider why love is harder to portray than war, why modern culture lacks an adequate vocabulary for love, and why friendship has been undervalued. The conversation revisits themes from C.S. Lewis, Cicero, Jane Austen, Tolstoy, and others, while also looking ahead to future seasons and the kinds of questions classic literature continues to provoke. Episode Outline Introduction and framing the season on love in contrast to the prior season on warWhy conflict is easier to dramatize than loveThe need for a richer vocabulary of love beyond romantic erosReconsidering the importance and rarity of true friendship (philia)Distinguishing friendship from camaraderie and social closenessReflections on The Wind in the Willows and Cicero as models of friendshipLove as an ontological and demanding subject rather than entertainmentRevisiting major literary masterworks on love and why they remain underratedAffection (storge) as love of place, home, and belongingMysticism and love: Simone Weil and Waiting on GodThe range of genres and voices explored during the seasonRomantic love as a mystery in classical thoughtRapid-fire reflections and closing thoughts on the season’s legacyKey Topics & Takeaways Love vs. War in Literature: War is often more narratively exciting because it centers on conflict, while love is more difficult to portray precisely because it aims at harmony and unity.The Poverty of Modern Love Vocabulary: English lacks precise terms for different kinds of love, flattening distinctions that were carefully preserved in Greek and Latin traditions.The Recovery of Friendship (Philia): True friendship is rare, selective, and morally demanding—far more than mere companionship or camaraderie.Affection and Love of Place (Storge): Love of home and country need not depend on superiority or perfection, but on belonging and loyalty despite flaws.Masterworks Remain Underrated: Familiar texts like Romeo and Juliet, Pride and Prejudice, and Anna Karenina are often misunderstood because their popularity obscures their depth.Mysticism as Energizing Love: Simone Weil’s Waiting on God presents love not as sentimental or escapist, but as demanding attention, patience, and openness.Romantic Love as Mystery: Classical thinkers treated romantic love as something strange, destabilizing, and difficult to explain—closer to a force of nature than a manageable emotion.Questions & Discussion Why is love harder to portray in literature than war?Consider how conflict, suffering, and resolution function differently in narratives about love versus narratives about violence.Do we need more words for love today?Reflect on how language shapes moral imagination and whether modern culture collapses distinct loves into a single category.What distinguishes true friendship from camaraderie or social closeness?Think about Cicero’s idea of friendship as “another self” and how that challenges modern assumptions.Why do classic love stories remain undervalued despite their fame?Consider whether overexposure dulls attentiveness and how rereading changes interpretation.Is romantic love best understood as rational choice or mystery?Compare modern expectations of romance with classical portrayals of love as destabilizing and inexplicable.Suggested Reading & Resources Waiting for God by Simone WeilThe Four Loves by C. S. Lewis   On Friendship by CiceroWind in the Willows by Kenneth Grahame    Romeo and Juliet by William Shakespeare Pride and Prejudice by Jane AustenAnna Karenina by Leo TolstoyLittle Women by Louisa May Alcott Devotchka

    31 min
  3. 12/30/2025

    Episode 22: Waiting on God - Simone Weil: An Incandescent Life

    Description In this episode of Hot Takes on the Classics, Emily Maeda and Tim McIntosh close their season on love by turning to Simone Weil’s Waiting for God. Through a wide-ranging conversation, they explore Weil’s life as an “activist mystic,” her radical commitment to solidarity with the afflicted, and her understanding of attention as the heart of prayer, learning, and love of neighbor. The episode examines Weil’s reflections on affliction, consent to suffering, and the paradoxical joy that emerges when the self is emptied, situating her thought alongside figures such as Julian of Norwich, Plato, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, and George Herbert. Episode Outline Opening quotation from Waiting for God and introduction to Simone WeilWeil’s historical context: a life spanning the two World WarsSimone Weil as “activist mystic”: solidarity, deprivation, and integrityWeil’s intellectual brilliance and philosophical formationEncounters with suffering: factory work, war, and social marginalizationWaiting for God as a book of letters and essaysLetters to Father Jean-Marie Perrin and Weil’s struggle with baptismAttention as the core of prayer, education, and loveAffliction (malheur) and consent to the voidJoy, suffering, and supernatural reversalWeil’s encounter with George Herbert’s “Love (III)”Closing reflections on mysticism, activism, and transformed loveKey Topics & Takeaways Attention as Prayer: For Simone Weil, attention is not an act of willpower but a receptive openness. Taken to its highest degree, attention becomes prayer and prepares the soul to receive God.Affliction and the Void: Weil understands affliction as more than physical suffering—it annihilates the ego and creates an empty space in which God alone can enter.Consent Rather Than Escape: Spiritual transformation comes not from avoiding suffering but from consenting to it without illusion, allowing a mysterious reversal to occur.Education and Desire: True learning occurs through attention and is driven by desire and joy, echoing insights found in Plato and later educators like Charlotte Mason.Love of Neighbor as Creative Attention: Weil insists that genuine love recognizes the afflicted not as categories but as persons, offering presence and attention as acts of love.Questions & Discussion What does Simone Weil mean by “waiting for God”?Consider how waiting differs from asking, striving, or controlling, and how this challenges modern ideas of prayer and productivity.How does Weil redefine attention in both education and spiritual life?Reflect on how her understanding of attention contrasts with the modern “attention economy.”What role does affliction play in spiritual transformation?Discuss whether Weil’s insistence on consent to suffering is compelling, troubling, or both.How does Weil’s thought compare to other mystics discussed this season, such as Julian of Norwich?Explore similarities and differences in how they understand suffering, joy, and divine love.What does it mean to love one’s neighbor through attention?Consider the practical implications of Weil’s claim that attention itself is an act of love.Suggested Reading & Resources Waiting for God by Simone WeilSimone Weil's The Iliad or the Poem of Force by Simone WeilRevelations of Divine Love by Julian of NorwichThe Republic by Plato translated by Allan Bloom The Cost of Discipleship by Dietrich BonhoefferThe Temple, “Love (III)” by George HerbertDevotchka

    37 min
  4. 12/23/2025

    Episode 21: Revelations of Divine Love: St. Julian's Mystical Sight

    Description In this episode of Hot Takes on the Classics, Emily Maeda and Tim McIntosh explore Revelations of Divine Love by Julian of Norwich, the first known book written in English by a woman. They discuss Julian’s life as a fourteenth-century anchoress, her extraordinary visions during a near-fatal illness, and her enduring theological vision of divine love as all-encompassing, sustaining, and ultimately victorious over sin and suffering. Along the way, they reflect on the nature of mysticism, the symbolic imagination of medieval Christianity, and why Julian’s insistence that “all shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of thing shall be well” can only be understood in the shadow of the Cross. Episode Outline Opening quotation from "Little Gidding" by T.S. Eliot and its connection to Julian of NorwichJulian of Norwich’s historical context: anchoress life, Middle English, and medieval spiritualityThe recovery, transmission, and modern rediscovery of Revelations of Divine LoveWhat it means to call Julian a “mystic” and how mysticism differs from systematic theologyJulian’s illness, visions, and the structure of the “shewings”The hazelnut vision and Julian’s understanding of creation as sustained by loveSin as “behovely” and the meaning of “all shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of thing shall be well”Julian’s Trinitarian vision of love and being “oynd” with GodChrist as mother: metaphor, symbolism, and theological daringThe lasting relevance of Julian’s mystical theology for modern readersKey Topics & Takeaways Mysticism and Direct Vision: Julian exemplifies the mystic as one who receives interior visions that convey theological truth through symbol, image, and contemplation rather than abstract doctrine.Love as the Structure of Reality: For Julian, divine love is not merely an attribute of God but the sustaining force of all that exists, holding creation together like a hazelnut in God’s hand.Sin as Privation, Not Power: Sin is real and painful, but it has no independent substance; it is contained within God’s larger work of love and redemption.The Cross as the Context of Hope: Julian’s famous assurance that “all shall be well and all manner of thing shall be well” emerges not from denial of suffering but from prolonged contemplation of Christ’s Passion.Expansive Christological Imagery: Julian’s portrayal of Christ as mother draws on medieval symbolism to express nourishment, sacrifice, and intimate care, expanding the reader’s theological imagination.Questions & Discussion What distinguishes mysticism from formal theology in Julian’s writing?Consider how vision, symbol, and lived experience function differently from doctrinal explanation.How does the hazelnut vision reshape the way we think about creation and evil?Reflect on whether seeing the world as sustained entirely by love alters how we interpret suffering.What does Julian mean when she says that “Sin is behovely”?Discuss how this idea challenges modern assumptions about moral causality and blame.How does Julian of Norwich’s assurance “all shall be well and all manner of thing shall be well” resonate with Tolkien’s idea of eucatastrophe?Consider how both thinkers understand hope not as the denial of suffering, but as the surprising revelation of goodness emerging through loss, failure, or apparent defeat.How should modern readers approach Julian’s image of Christ as mother?Consider the role of metaphor and symbolism in theology and whether discomfort signals resistance or misunderstanding.Suggested Reading & Resources Revelations of Divine Love by Julian of NorwichThe Book of Margery Kempe by Margery KempeFour Quartets,"Little Gidding" by T.S. EliotThomas Aquinas: Selected Writings by Thomas Aquinas The Lord of the Rings by J.R.R. Tolkien Devotchka

    44 min
  5. 12/16/2025

    Episode 20: The Temple: The Architecture of the Soul — George Herbert

    Description In this episode of Hot Takes on the Classics, Tim McIntosh and Emily Maeda explore The Temple by George Herbert, one of the most profound devotional poetry collections in the English language. Through close readings of Herbert’s poems and reflections on his life, suffering, and vocation, the hosts examine how Herbert uses poetic form, architectural structure, and startling imagery to express the depths of divine love. Along the way, they reflect on the experience of reading poetry slowly and attentively, the relationship between affliction and grace, and why Herbert continues to shape poets, theologians, and readers centuries later. Episode Outline Opening reading of George Herbert’s poem “Bitter-sweet”Emily’s personal encounter with Herbert through Christine Perrin’s lecture at The CiRCE National ConferencePoetry as an experiential art: reading collections versus isolated poemsComparing poetry collections to listening to a full albumDiscussion of poetry collections by Rainer Maria Rilke, T.S. Eliot, and R.S. ThomasGeorge Herbert’s life: education, illness, vocation, and pastoral ministryHerbert’s relationship to John Donne and the metaphysical poetsThe Country Parson as Herbert’s only work published during his lifetimeThe posthumous publication and reception of The TempleStructural “architecture” of The Temple: Church Porch, The Church, The Church MilitantClose readings and discussion of poems from The Temple, including “The Glance,” “The Agony,” “Virtue,” “The Wreath,” and “Love (III)”.Herbert’s use of poetic form (visual poems, repetition, symmetry)Reflections from T.S. Eliot, W.H. Auden, Elizabeth Bishop, and Simone WeilPoetry as the proper language for suffering and divine loveClosing reflections on poetry, attention, and formationKey Topics & Takeaways Poetry as Formation: Herbert’s poetry resists abstraction and demands patient attention, shaping the reader through image, rhythm, and form rather than argument.Affliction and Divine Love: Herbert presents suffering not as a contradiction of God’s love but as one of its deepest avenues, especially in poems like “The Agony” and “Love (III).”Architectural Meaning: The Temple is structured like a sacred space—moving inward, upward, and through the stages of the Christian life.Form Serves Meaning: Herbert’s experimental poetic forms (wreaths, wings, typographic play) embody theological truth rather than merely decorate it.Enduring Influence: Herbert’s work continues to shape modern poets, theologians, and seekers across belief traditions.Questions & Discussion Why does reading poetry slowly matter?Consider how reading an entire poetry collection—rather than isolated poems—changes interpretation and emotional impact.How does Herbert connect suffering and love?Reflect on how poems like “The Agony” and “Love (III)” portray pain as a vehicle for grace rather than its opposite.What does Herbert gain by using poetic form visually?Discuss how poems like “The Wreath” or “Easter Wings” communicate meaning through structure, not just words.Can poetry communicate theological truth better than prose?Think about why figures like Erik Varden argue that poetry is uniquely suited to expressing spiritual realities.Why does “Love (III)” remain so powerful for readers today?Reflect on its depiction of divine hospitality, shame, and acceptance, and why it continues to resonate across centuries.Suggested Reading The Temple by George HerbertThe Poems of George Hebert by George HerbertThe Country Parson by George HerbertConfessions by St. Augustine translated by Sarah RudenHoly Sonnets by John DonneDuino Elegies by  Rainer Maria RilkeFour Quartets by T.S. EliotR.S. Thomas: Everyman Poetry by R.S. ThomasWaiting for God by Simone WeilHealing Wounds by Bishop Erik VardenChastity: The Reconciliation of Senses by Bishop Erik Varden

    1h 3m
  6. 12/09/2025

    Episode 19: The Art and Music of Love: Theresa, Dido, and Shepherds

    Description In this episode of Hot Takes on the Classics, Emily Maeda and Tim McIntosh explore how Western art and music have depicted the many faces of love—from divine ecstasy to tragic longing to the gentle affections of pastoral life. They move through Beethoven’s Pastoral Symphony, Purcell’s Dido and Aeneas, Bernini’s Ecstasy of St. Teresa, and Bruegel’s The Wedding Dance, examining how artists across eras have tried to portray the beauty, complexity, and vulnerability of human and divine love. Through music, sculpture, and painting, Emily and Tim reflect on what these works reveal about desire, the human soul, and our longing for harmony. Episode Outline Opening reflections on how music and visual art express forms of love beyond wordsBeethoven’s Pastoral Symphony and the emotional world of shepherdsThe pastoral tradition and the association of shepherds with simplicity, joy, and musical beautyPieter Bruegel’s The Wedding Dance and the communal joys of embodied loveBernini’s The Ecstasy of St. Teresa as a depiction of divine, overwhelming unionThe ambiguity of mystical imagery—sensual, spiritual, or both?Shift to tragic eros in Purcell’s Dido and AeneasDido’s lament as one of the most powerful expressions of forsaken loveClassical echoes: Virgil’s Aeneid and Dido’s place in the InfernoClosing reflections on what art and music teach us about the varieties of loveKey Topics & Takeaways Music as a Language of Affection and Joy: Beethoven’s Pastoral Symphony evokes the emotional clarity, peace, and playfulness associated with shepherds—figures who embody a simpler, more integrated relationship to nature and love.The Pastoral Tradition and Innocent Desire: From classical poetry to Renaissance art, shepherds symbolize a state of harmony where affection and desire are uncorrupted by ambition or social pretense.Embodied Celebration in Bruegel’s The Wedding Dance: Bruegel captures the physicality, joy, and communal warmth of love—reminding us that affection is often expressed through bodies in motion.The Ecstatic Union in Bernini’s St. Teresa: Bernini dramatizes a moment of mystical encounter that blurs the line between spiritual and sensual love, inviting viewers to consider the intensity of divine desire.Dido’s Tragic Eros in Purcell and Virgil: Dido’s grief in Dido and Aeneas echoes the literary Dido of the Aeneid, revealing how erotic love can elevate and devastate. Her lament remains one of the most moving expressions of abandonment in Western music.Questions & Discussion How does pastoral imagery shape our understanding of innocent love?Consider how shepherds represent harmony, simplicity, and musical beauty. Does this imagery still resonate with modern listeners? What role do bodies play in the expression of love?Reflect on Bruegel’s Wedding Dance. How does embodied joy communicate forms of affection that words cannot? Is Bernini’s Ecstasy of St. Teresa primarily spiritual or sensual?Discuss whether the sculpture’s intensity reveals something essential about divine love—or whether it intentionally makes us uncomfortable.What makes Dido’s lament so emotionally powerful?Think about how Purcell uses musical repetition, silence, and harmonic descent to portray a soul collapsing under the weight of loss.How do these artworks together expand our understanding of love? Explore how divine love, tragic love, and communal love form a fuller picture than any single work could express.Suggested Reading & Related Resources The Four Loves by C. S. LewisThe Aeneid by Virgil  The Holy Bible Symphony No. 6 (“Pastoral”) by Ludwig van BeethovenDido and Aeneas (“Dido’s Lament”) by Henry Purcell The Wedding Dance by Pieter Bruegel the Elder“The Ecstasy of Saint Teresa” by Gian Lorenzo Bernini Various sculptures, fountains, architectural works by Gian Lorenzo BerniniAs You Like It by William ShakespeareThe Winter’s Tale by William ShakespeareAll’s Well That Ends Well by William Shakespeare

    53 min
  7. 12/02/2025

    Episode 18: A Treatise Concerning Religious Affections - Jonathan Edwards: Testing of Our Loves

    Description In this episode of Hot Takes on the Classics, Emily Maeda and Tim McIntosh take a deep dive into Jonathan Edwards’s A Treatise Concerning Religious Affections, one of the most important theological works ever published in America. They explore Edwards’s historical moment in the midst of the First Great Awakening, the cultural divide between “old lights” and “new lights,” and Edwards’s effort to distinguish genuine spiritual transformation from mere emotional excitement. Along the way, they unpack Edwards’s definition of “affections,” discuss why Edwards remains so influential, and consider how his framework might apply to the renewed spiritual energy emerging in the U.S. today. Episode Outline Opening quotation from A Treatise Concerning Religious AffectionsWho was Jonathan Edwards? Background, intellect, and role in American ChristianityEdwards’s historical moment: The First Great AwakeningOld Lights vs. New Lights — a cultural and theological divideWhy Edwards’s preaching feels “medieval” to modern earsEdwards on the nature of “religious affections”False signs of spiritual renewal — emotions vs. lasting changeTrue signs of grace — the centrality of long-term obedienceEdwards’s pastoral purpose in writing the TreatiseParallels between the Great Awakening and contemporary spiritual “vibe shifts”Closing reflections on agape and the love of GodKey Topics & Takeaways Edwards’s World: Revival and Upheaval: Edwards writes in the heart of the First Great Awakening—a period of mass conversions, emotional preaching, and widespread debate about what counts as “true religion.”Affections vs. Emotions: For Edwards, affections are deep movements of the will—love, hatred, desire—not fleeting emotions. Genuine Christianity requires these affections to be transformed.False Signs of Spiritual Renewal: Intense emotions, tears, dramatic experiences, or even hearing Scripture in powerful ways do not necessarily indicate genuine spiritual change.True Signs of Grace: Edwards insists that lasting obedience, humility, love, and good works—not dramatic feelings—are the real evidence of transformed affections.Relevance for Today: Tim and Emily connect Edwards’s concerns to modern American spiritual trends, asking whether our current “renewals” will lead to sustained, virtuous lives.Questions & Discussion What distinction does Edwards make between emotions and true spiritual affections?Consider why Edwards locates religious transformation in the will rather than in fleeting feelings. How might this help us evaluate contemporary spiritual experiences?How does Edwards challenge both the ‘old lights’ and the ‘new lights’?Reflect on Edwards’s attempt to affirm genuine emotion while warning against emotional excess. Where do you tend to locate yourself in this debate? Why does Edwards place so much emphasis on long-term obedience?Discuss whether you agree with Edwards that sustained virtue—not emotional intensity—is the clearest sign of genuine Christian faith.How does understanding the First Great Awakening illuminate Edwards’s Treatise?Think about how cultural, theological, and political pressures influenced Edwards’s writing and why his framework was so needed in a divided moment.What parallels do you see between Edwards’s time and current spiritual movements?Explore how Edwards’s insights might help us discern whether today’s “vibe shift” reflects genuine spiritual change.Suggested Reading Treatise on Religious Affections by Jonathan Edwards Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God by Jonathan Edwards A Religious History of the American People by Sydney E. AhlstromJonathan Edwards by George M. Marsden Pew Research CenterMcIntosh, Timothy Andrew. My Name Is SØREN KIERKEGAARD. Directed by Frank Mihelich

    41 min
  8. 11/25/2025

    Episode 17: The Confessions of St. Augustine: The Journey of Transformed Love

    Description In this episode of Hot Takes on the Classics, Emily Maeda and Tim McIntosh explore one of the most influential works in Western thought—St. Augustine’s Confessions. Through Augustine’s prayerful reflections, they trace the restless search of a soul divided between desire and grace, and how divine love—caritas—gathers a disintegrated self into unity. Emily and Tim discuss Augustine’s literary innovation, his relationship with his mother Monica, his encounter with Ambrose, and the pivotal conversion in the garden that forever shaped the Christian imagination. Along the way, they uncover why Confessions remains possibly not only the first memoir but also the greatest story of a heart transformed by love. Episode Outline Opening reading from Confessions, Book X: “Late have I loved you, beauty ever ancient, ever new…”Defining memoir vs. autobiography—why Confessions resists both labelsThe revolutionary nature of self-reflection in Augustine’s writingThe influence of Confessions on Western thinkers and writers: Dante, Kierkegaard, and WittgensteinAugustine’s relationship with his mother Monica as an image of caritasMonica’s perseverance and the bishop’s prophecy: “The son of so many tears will not perish.”Augustine’s flirtation with Manichaeism and the intellectual restlessness it revealedEncounter with Ambrose in Milan and the power of typological readingThe conversion in the garden: “Tolle lege, tolle lege”—“Take and read”Reading Romans 13 and the surrender of the divided willAugustine’s vision of divine love gathering a fragmented soul into unityThe final scene with Monica: shared contemplation of eternal wisdomAugustine’s later reflections on memory, time, and creation—feeling ideas rather than merely thinking themThe enduring image of Confessions as a prayer, not merely a storyKey Topics & Takeaways The Birth of the Modern Self: Augustine’s Confessions created a new literary form—introspective, honest, and spiritually reflective—laying the groundwork for later memoirs and psychological writing.Love as Caritas: For Augustine, divine love (caritas) is self-giving, faithful, and redemptive. It unites a fragmented soul and orders all human loves under the love of God.The Role of Monica: Augustine’s mother models steadfast, intercessory love—a living embodiment of patient, redemptive grace that mirrors divine charity.From Disintegration to Unity: Augustine’s conversion is not merely moral but ontological—the healing of a divided self through the gathering power of divine love.The Nature of Conversion: Augustine’s moment in the garden reveals that faith is both intellectual assent and surrender of the will—love that transforms desire itself.Influence Across Centuries: From Kierkegaard to Tolstoy, Confessions shaped how the West understands interiority, repentance, and the restless search for meaning.Questions & Discussion What makes The Confessions more than a memoir?Consider how Augustine’s prayerful address to God transforms the genre. In what ways is it less about recounting facts and more about revealing divine truth?How does Monica’s love exemplify caritas?Reflect on her perseverance and faith. How might Monica’s love serve as a model for parental or spiritual intercession today?Why is Augustine’s conversion scene set in a garden?Discuss the symbolism of the garden—from the theft of pears to the moment of surrender. What might Augustine be saying about the restoration of Eden?What does it mean that Augustine “felt ideas”?Explore how Augustine’s intellect and emotion intertwine. How does his way of “feeling ideas” invite readers into a deeper, more embodied understanding of truth?How does divine love unify the divided self?Consider Augustine’s confession: “You gathered me from the disintegration in which I had been lost.” How does love heal fragmentation in our modern experience of selfhood?What legacy did Confessions leave on Western thought?Identify how Augustine influenced later thinkers such as Dante, Kierkegaard, Wittgenstein, and Charles Taylor. How does his vision of selfhood still shape our modern world?Suggested Reading Confessions by St. Augustine translated by Sarah RudenCity of Godby St. Augustine translated by Henry BettensonA Confession by Leo Tolstoy translated by Alastair Hannay Philosophical Fragments and Fear and Trembling by Søren KierkegaardPhilosophical Investigationsby Ludwig WittgensteinSources of the Self by Charles Taylor Chronicles of Wasted Time by Malcolm MuggeridgeRomans 13The Gospel of John

    50 min
5
out of 5
34 Ratings

About

Hot Takes on the Classics is no dusty, academic approach to great books. It’s a gossipy, exciting discussion about the best literature ever written. Hosted by Tim and Emily, who are veteran teachers and long-time friends, Hot Takes is packed with playful debate, meaningful speculation, and hearty laughs.