A few NotebookLM generated podcasts from Peter Cramton

Peter Cramton

Electrifying nearly everything is necessary as the world transitions to net zero carbon emissions. Electricity demand will double with rapid innovation in supply and demand. As the share of intermittent renewables, primarily solar and wind, grows and extreme weather events become more frequent, balancing supply and demand every second becomes more challenging. Restructured wholesale markets provide real-time balancing. The market determines clearing prices that balance supply and demand, motivating operations to maximize social welfare. Prices vary by time and place. Electricity prices, typically about $40 per megawatt-hour, may be negative when renewable production is high and thousands of dollars during extreme weather. Participants attempt to manage this risk with forward trade, but several market failures limit risk management and undermine efficient investment. Electricity markets have struggled with these challenges for decades. Our market platform addresses the critical market failures that have hindered efficient electricity investment and stifled innovation: incomplete markets, market power, and uncertainty. Once adopted, this research will expedite decarbonization. It leverages robust market designs to foster innovation and competition, bringing essential flexibility for reliable and resilient electricity in a setting with high renewable penetration. The research identifies the need to involve demand, particularly during extreme weather. Such a market significantly enhances price incentives, enabling efficient investment and operation of participants' resources. Notably, retail consumers stand to benefit from these reforms. The result is a net-zero economy that provides reliable and resilient electricity at the least cost. The venture develops a forward energy market that aligns market participants' incentives with social welfare. The new market promotes competition and innovation through improved forward trading and improves investment incentives, reliability, and resilience to extreme events, avoiding a costly and inefficient capacity market. The market reforms are designed to be introduced by existing independent system operators. The process can be gradual and low-cost since core systems need not change. The open-source platform we are building and testing is highly customizable, recognizing that every system operator has its ideal adoption path. The forward energy market allows frictionless, gradual trade of energy and related products that are defined finely in terms of time and location. It complements the system operator's spot market. The bidding language is designed for easy and effective participation, and market participants can tailor strategies to their circumstances. Our team, comprising computer science, economics, applied math, and finance researchers, is leading a global effort to expedite the green energy transition while improving the reliability and resiliency of critical infrastructure. We have made enormous progress in developing ideas, building a proof-of-concept, and establishing ease of participation and robustness. These efforts will continue for many years through a continuous improvement and adoption cycle globally, underscoring the potential impact of our work on a global scale. This podcast discusses the power of flow trading to allow efficient and transparent trade of time-and-location commodities like electricity, communications, and transportation. The approach maximizes social welfare, enabling market participants to manage needs and risks as information is revealed.

  1. Universal service in Thailand. What policy is best?

    02/12/2025

    Universal service in Thailand. What policy is best?

    Peter Cramton's response to a telecommunications journalist on February 12, 2025, outlines a market-based approach to achieving universal service in the global communications market. He critiques traditional methods, such as buildout obligations or administratively allocated subsidies, and advocates for competitive procurement auctions, a system proven effective in the U.S. under the FCC’s Rural Digital Opportunity Fund (RDOF). Cramton’s approach involves three key steps: (1) defining standard mobile and fixed broadband services (e.g., $50/month for mobile service with 10 Mbps speed and 15GB data), (2) identifying noneconomic areas where market forces fail to provide these services, and (3) conducting annual descending clock auctions to select the least-cost providers for three-year contracts. This ensures efficient resource allocation, reduces subsidies, and improves consumer services. Providers must meet service standards or face penalties and disqualification from future auctions. Cramton defends the proposed Thailand Independent Market Operator (TIMO) model as grounded in proven economic principles. He underscores the effectiveness of price mechanisms in guiding market behavior and critiques special interests that misrepresent policies to maintain inefficiencies. Supporting materials on auction design and open-access markets are available on his website. Supporting material is available on my webpage cramton.umd.edu/communications “A Study on Designing IMT Multiband Auction Formats for Thailand,” prepared for NBTC. [First Workshop YouTube, Slides, 17 December 2024] “An Open-Access Market for Global Communications” (with Erik Bohlin, Simon Brandkamp, Jason Dark, Darrell Hoy, Albert S. Kyle, David Malec, Axel Ockenfels, and Chris Wilkens) Telecommunications Policy, 48, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2024.102820. [Presentation, Interactive Demo, Sample Code] “An open-access obligation is the best way to enhance competition following consolidation in mobile communications,” University of Maryland Working Paper, 2025.

    12 min
  2. Flow trading brings transparent and efficient pricing to electricity markets

    02/04/2025

    Flow trading brings transparent and efficient pricing to electricity markets

    Two papers propose innovative market designs to improve efficiency and transparency in financial and energy markets. One paper models electricity market dynamics using a regime-switching model to simulate realistic price distributions and explore hedging strategies. The other paper introduces "Flow Trading," a novel market design that allows for portfolio trading, continuous-scaled limit orders, and frequent batch auctions, demonstrating its computational feasibility and addressing several weaknesses of existing systems. A third source suggests a forward energy market that aligns participant incentives with social welfare, enhancing competition and resilience and potentially replacing capacity markets. These papers collectively explore how market design can improve resource allocation and risk management. Electricity requires a delicate balance of supply and demand every second. The system operator guides this behavior with the energy price—the reward for generators and the cost for wholesale consumers. The system operator optimizes the market participants' preferences to maximize as-bid social welfare subject to network and resource constraints. The problem is nontrivial as the startup of generating units introduces nonconvexities, and there are significant fluctuations in supply and demand due to weather, outages, and other factors. Price is the sole means to guide behavior to achieve the critical real-time balance. Despite the average energy price hovering around $25/MWh, the system's resilience depends on real-time prices fluctuating from -$100 to $9000/MWh—orders of magnitude more volatile than equities and bonds. Budish, Eric, Peter Cramton, Albert S. Kyle, Jeongmin Lee, and David Malec, “Flow Trading,” University of Maryland Working Paper, March 2023. Revise and resubmit at American Economic Review. Cramton, Peter, Simon Brandkamp, Hung-po Chao, Jason Dark, Darrell Hoy, Albert S. Kyle, David Malec, Axel Ockenfels, and Chris Wilkens, “A Forward Energy Market to Improve Reliability and Resiliency” University of Maryland Working Paper, February 2025. Simon Brandkamp, Cramton, Peter, Jason Dark, Darrell Hoy, David Malec, and Chris Wilkens, “Hedging electricity price spikes with forwards and options,” University of Maryland Working Paper, February 2025.

    24 min
  3. San Diego’s coastal train is train is unsustainable. Why is SANDAG denying it?

    01/30/2025

    San Diego’s coastal train is train is unsustainable. Why is SANDAG denying it?

    Over the past 20 years, it has become increasingly clear that the 61-mile San Clemente to San Diego segment of the coastal train is unsustainable. The region's coast is eroding at 6 inches annually. The train is a few feet from the bluff's edge in Del Mar and nearly in the surf in San Clemente. Twenty years of armoring at a cost approaching $1 billion have kept the train running most days, although outages are long and frequent. The Union-Tribune regularly reports on the coastal train and the efforts to relocate the rail away from the coast. Sadly, the stories echo the communications from SANDAG, which offer a steady spin on how essential the train is: "the only rail connection to the rest of the United States" or "the second-busiest rail corridor in the United States." As recently as Jan. 10, the paper reported on a federal grant intended to expand train service between Los Angeles and San Diego without a single comment on whether demand for this exists and what the true costs per user would be. Whether intended, this lack of critical perspective supports the myths about the train's value to the area. The articles, like SANDAG, never ask, "Does the train still make sense for the San Diego segment?" Opinion pieces have offered a more reasoned response to the issue. Trains cannot climb over mountains, so the solution requires tunnels in Del Mar and relocating the tracks in San Clemente, which, combined, may cost $20 billion over more than 10 years. This is despite the increasing evidence that existing heavy rail functions can be more economically accomplished in different ways, including light rail and electric vehicles — trucks, buses, cars, bikes and scooters — and information technology-supported transportation management via dedicated lanes along existing freeway corridors. Let's estimate the per-user subsidy to gauge the absurdity of the coastal train. The calculation is hampered by poor transparency in ridership. We focus on 2023, the most recent year for which we have data, and only on the projected costs to relocate the train, not the additional annual expenditures for operations and maintenance nor the opportunity cost of using the right-of-way for other purposes. Three passenger trains make use of the segment — Surfliner (San Clemente-San Diego), Metrolink (San Clemente-Oceanside) and Coaster (Oceanside-San Diego). We wish to calculate the annual per-user subsidy of a commuter taking the train to and from work five days per week for 48 weeks of the year. The round trips from all trains in 2023 were 576,884, and the annual amortization of $20 billion over 30 years with a 4 percent discount rate is $1,157 million, yielding a yearly subsidy per commuter of $481,137. Such a subsidy is indefensible.

    10 min

About

Electrifying nearly everything is necessary as the world transitions to net zero carbon emissions. Electricity demand will double with rapid innovation in supply and demand. As the share of intermittent renewables, primarily solar and wind, grows and extreme weather events become more frequent, balancing supply and demand every second becomes more challenging. Restructured wholesale markets provide real-time balancing. The market determines clearing prices that balance supply and demand, motivating operations to maximize social welfare. Prices vary by time and place. Electricity prices, typically about $40 per megawatt-hour, may be negative when renewable production is high and thousands of dollars during extreme weather. Participants attempt to manage this risk with forward trade, but several market failures limit risk management and undermine efficient investment. Electricity markets have struggled with these challenges for decades. Our market platform addresses the critical market failures that have hindered efficient electricity investment and stifled innovation: incomplete markets, market power, and uncertainty. Once adopted, this research will expedite decarbonization. It leverages robust market designs to foster innovation and competition, bringing essential flexibility for reliable and resilient electricity in a setting with high renewable penetration. The research identifies the need to involve demand, particularly during extreme weather. Such a market significantly enhances price incentives, enabling efficient investment and operation of participants' resources. Notably, retail consumers stand to benefit from these reforms. The result is a net-zero economy that provides reliable and resilient electricity at the least cost. The venture develops a forward energy market that aligns market participants' incentives with social welfare. The new market promotes competition and innovation through improved forward trading and improves investment incentives, reliability, and resilience to extreme events, avoiding a costly and inefficient capacity market. The market reforms are designed to be introduced by existing independent system operators. The process can be gradual and low-cost since core systems need not change. The open-source platform we are building and testing is highly customizable, recognizing that every system operator has its ideal adoption path. The forward energy market allows frictionless, gradual trade of energy and related products that are defined finely in terms of time and location. It complements the system operator's spot market. The bidding language is designed for easy and effective participation, and market participants can tailor strategies to their circumstances. Our team, comprising computer science, economics, applied math, and finance researchers, is leading a global effort to expedite the green energy transition while improving the reliability and resiliency of critical infrastructure. We have made enormous progress in developing ideas, building a proof-of-concept, and establishing ease of participation and robustness. These efforts will continue for many years through a continuous improvement and adoption cycle globally, underscoring the potential impact of our work on a global scale. This podcast discusses the power of flow trading to allow efficient and transparent trade of time-and-location commodities like electricity, communications, and transportation. The approach maximizes social welfare, enabling market participants to manage needs and risks as information is revealed.