The Blue Ridge Breakdown

Troy N. Miller

Breaking down the breakdowns. blueridgebreakdown.substack.com

  1. FEB 10

    Congress Cut Medicaid to Fund ICE — and Left WV's Legislature to Foot the Bill

    Republicans in Congress gutted health care funding to expand Trump’s “papers please” goon squad, and now states like West Virginia are left to absorb the fallout, forced to decide whether to slash essential services or scramble to replace billions in lost federal dollars. In this conversation, I’m joined by Mindy Renae Holcomb of West Virginia Citizen Action Group to unpack what that tradeoff looks like on the ground: who pays the price, why so-called “optional” services aren’t optional at all, and what’s still at stake as the legislative session barrels forward.This transcript has been generated with machine and human input and errors are likely. Troy Miller So we are halfway done, just about halfway done with the West Virginia legislative session, which is, for people who don’t know, a 60-day session. We are a part-time legislature here in West Virginia. And so it’s a, it’s a little bit of time to cram in a lot of chicanery and robbery and bad ideas and all of this from income tax cuts that we can’t afford to taking any sort of regulations off of private schools while cracking down and making sure the public schools have to do more with less. All of these things. If you know it is. In summary, it is impossible, I think for any single person to be able to follow everything that’s going on in the legislature. So with that as backdrop, I do find that you can follow some groups including West Virginia Citizen Action Group and which in who employ my next guest, Mindy Renae Holcomb. Mindy Renae Holcomb, who is their organizing manager, healthcare lead over at West Virginia Citizens Action Group and she joins us now. So thank you Mindy, first of all for taking the time here. Mindy Renae Holcomb Oh absolutely. Thanks for having me. Troy Miller Always a pleasure. Okay. With all of that is kind of the background about what may or may not be going on down there. What is you’re the organizing. I’m sorry, I have to get it right. Organizing manager at healthcare lead. So let’s really focus in on that angle. What, what do we have going on? What are you paying attention to? What is particularly bad or particularly good? Take it from there, if you will. Mindy Renae Holcomb Well, yeah, we’re, we’re watching for of course any vaccination adjustments that they, that may be made. You know, reduction in requirements simply because West Virginia has one of the, if not the top vaccination program in the country. It’s one of the good things we are known for and we want to keep that. We want to keep our state healthy. And so we are definitely watching that pretty closely. We’re also watching for things that we will reduce because of the HR1 is which how I simply just demand on referring to it instead of the one big beautiful bill, the big ugly bill is how I I big ugly nasty bill. Yeah. That anything that’s going to reduce any services that are associated with Medicaid, particularly because that is, you know, we have a high population in West Virginia who utilizes Medicaid. We’ve already had the disaster of the, well, this is separate from Medicaid, but the enhanced premium tax credits that got, did not get renewed and those helped lower lower middle class folks afford plans on the exchange on the marketplace. And those have pretty, that, that up in Washington, D.C. that’s pretty much been dropped. So we’ve seen a drastic reduction of folks who are utilizing the marketplace. And I think, you know, even though it’s, you know, because of everything else that’s exploded in D.C. we still need to put pressure on our representatives there to, you know, because this is such an important program and it’s vitally important to West Virginians. So I’m not ready to pull the plug on anything being done. Obviously, it’s not going to help anyone this year, but I think we need to continue to bang that drum so that we can get people back on, get people insured and get them the care that they rightfully deserve. Troy Miller Yeah. And I’ll just say on that front, I think it’s starting to become clearer in people’s actual lives what we were, you know, screaming about last year when all of this was being either inaction on the part of the enhanced tax subsidies or the enhanced subsidies or action in the terms of just gutting rural health systems. And then, you know, saying, oh, here’s, here’s what, $200 million, that whatever it is, that’s a, that’s a band aid for under the amputation after you cut billions out. And we’re seeing like, you know, local business owners here in Jefferson County. There are a number of them who I know have said my family could no longer afford the, the coverage we need. And we’re going to piece it. Well, you know, we’ll try to piece it together, but please call your Congress, your Congress critters here in West Virginia. Yeah, that is huge. And to really hammer it home, West Virginia is also one of the states with the highest rates of people living with disabilities. And so there’s this whole article or feature over at PBS NewsHour a couple of weeks ago, particularly about how people with disabilities are going to bear the burden of these Medicaid funding cuts more than other people with disabilities in rural areas are going to disproportionately impact it. And it really pissed me off when I saw a couple of it must have been last month that our Congress people didn’t even manage to get us like the per person, per-rural-patient the same amount of revenue or the same amount of incoming funds to make up the Medicaid cap as, like, rural New York or rural Connecticut. Which just boggles my mind that we have such bad negotiators in Congress who are willing to just. I mean, with Shelley, her son got an appointment to the federal prosecutor’s office or the representing this dish. So, you know, cool, I guess, for them, but for the rest of us in West Virginia. Yeah. And it’s up to the. It’s up to our state legislature now to either exacerbate this problem through inaction or to start to address the problem from the state level. What are you looking at in terms of that? I know that there are some. There have been some movement that might even have some bipartisan support to, like, not totally hose all of us, but correct me if I’m wrong. Mindy Renae Holcomb Well, what we are concerned about is that Morrissey has said, don’t ask for any state funds to supplement or not supplement, but replace federal funds. So that’s going to put us in a pretty hard, hard way. And also, one of the ways that they are going to have. That they’re going to have to look at this is by cutting optional services. And that would be dental care that we fought so hard to get for West Virginia. I’m really worried about how IDD waiver is going to survive this. That is considered an optional service. So for those that don’t, there are services that are absolutely required under federal mandate for Medicaid. Anything else that is provided through the states is considered optional, and they aren’t what we would consider optional. Troy Miller Right, right. And I just want to ask you to elaborate on IDD a little bit. Mindy Renae Holcomb What is it for sure, Intellectual, developmental disabilities. So folks that have, you know, autism, that need additional care, those who have other, you know, disabilities that affect their ability to work, go to school, that need extra services in order to allow them to live a full life and participate fully in school and in work. Those services can be cut, eliminated. I mean, I’m not trying to put the fear out there, but it’s just. Troy Miller It could be right, something, as you were about to say, they’re not optional for the families, you know. Mindy Renae Holcomb Exactly. Troy Miller These services need to be. Especially, I mean, with dental, it really puts the nail on the head. Like, I’m sorry, we all have teeth. You know, it’s not really an optional thing to take care of them or not. And they’re a big indicator for our general health. Mindy Renae Holcomb 100%. Troy Miller And it’s only because the dentistry lobby has been so effective in America of sectioning themselves off from the rest of healthcare that this is even a discussion. Which is why, right. We don’t have any sort of. Well, we don’t have any universal healthcare, but there’s not even a requirement for dental services on private insurance to cover any damn thing. Basically, it’s all very patchwork, which is why we see commercials on the TV for this type of dental insurance and this type of supplemental dental insurance and all of this. Which is just mind boggling in the richest country in the world at the richest time in our history that we’ve turned an industry into. Hey, do you have teeth? Do you not want them to fall out of your head? Great. You can pay for this extra insurance for it. You know, that’s absurd. And our governor has, of course, he’s not going to supplement the funds with what we actually need. And as I pointed out back then and in past years, these are federally matched funds a lot of the time. So it’s not just, you know, we’re not just cutting the spending by $1, we’re cutting it by $2 to $3 a lot of the time. Just right out of our system and right out of the care that, yeah, West Virginians need just as much as anyone. What else do we have going on down in the legislature? Watch on YouTube, Like and Subscribe! Mindy Renae Holcomb Well, you know, I would argue more. So we have a very aging population. We have a very sick population. So, you know, I would put the argument out there that, you know, I have said from the beginning of HR1 that West Virginia will suffer the most out of anyone in the nation. And I still stand by that statement. And we seem to have a lot of folks who, you know, in our legislature who are prioritizing other pet projects or, you know, I’m just going to name it. And this is me speaking as M

    49 min
  2. JAN 15

    Thom Hartmann Breaks It Down: Oligarchy vs. Democracy, From Mesopotamia 11000 BC to Minneapolis 2026

    At a moment when democracy itself feels increasingly fragile at home and abroad, I sat down with Thom Hartmann to talk about power, oligarchy, and what he calls “humanity’s ancient way of living.” We discuss the historical roots of democracy, the rise of modern technocratic elites, the long arc from the New Deal to Project 2025, and why the struggle between democracy and authoritarianism is not new, but newly urgent. This conversation is wide-ranging, candid, and grounded in history, with an eye toward what comes next. Below is a transcript generated in part using Alice.ai and ChatGPT. You can watch and listen to The Blue Ridge Breakdown across the internet This conversation is available on YouTube, Apple Podcasts, and Spotify, with clips and highlights on Troy’s Instagram. Troy MillerThom Hartmann is America’s number one progressive talk radio host. You can find him daily from noon to 3 Eastern, 9 to noon Pacific, pretty much anywhere you can find radio, or progressive radio at that. And he’s the New York Times bestselling author of dozens of books, one of which is The Hidden History of American Democracy: Rediscovering Humanity’s Ancient Way of Living, another of which is The Last Hours of Ancient Sunlight, which I’m very proud to have worked on the updated edition of. Before we get too much further: Thom, welcome back to The Blue Ridge Breakdown. Thanks for joining us. Thom HartmannThanks, Troy. It’s always nice to hang out with you. My cat says hi, too. Troy MillerThom, as we’re recording this on January 14, 2026, I see basically everywhere I look, from the sort of intraparty Democratic level out to the streets of Minneapolis, out to the streets of Venezuela, this sort of existential question of: are we, the people, going to be in charge of our future here? Are we going to be able to do something about the existential crises of machine learning, artificial intelligence, automation, all of this? The existential crisis of climate change? Elon Musk has said that don’t bother squirreling away money anymore for retirement because in 10 or 20 years it’ll be irrelevant. Says a guy who’s about to be a trillionaire. And in the streets of Minneapolis, I think we’re seeing the same sort of thing play out, whether we’re going to have a bunch of masked bandits who are accountable only to Kristi Noem and Donald Trump basically roaming the streets and deciding who is ripe for violence, or whether we’re going to take control of our country. And the parallels—I see the end of the Roman Republic into the Empire stages. I see the British, the Boston Massacre has been coming to mind as I look at Minneapolis. FDR talked about in one of his inaugural addresses: we fought the enemy without in the American Revolution; we fought the enemy within in the Civil War; and at the time, FDR was saying that we were again confronting the enemy without with Fascist Italy and Nazi Germany and imperialist Japan. I think we’re facing the enemy within again today. So with all of that, one of the reasons I really wanted to talk to you today, and in the midst of all of this, is that you have literally written a book on American democracy and rediscovering humanity’s ancient way of living. So with all of that as primer, what do you mean when you’re talking about reclaiming humanity’s ancient way of living, for one? And for two, what do we have with American democracy? How is this so special? Why is this so special? Thom HartmannYeah, well, I mean, what we have right now is increasingly oligarchy in the United States, unfortunately. But yeah, democracy is the oldest operating system for humanity. Virtually every aboriginal or Indigenous tribe around the world is organized democratically or something close to it. That’s the system that the founders of this country—Madison and Jefferson and Franklin in particular—they were the three who had a lot of interactions with Native Americans as they were growing up and throughout their lives, particularly Jefferson and Franklin. And what they observed was democracy actually happening in these communities, the largest of which, of course, was the Haudenosaunee Confederacy. And so this message—that there is a way that humans can live where power flows from the bottom up, not the top down, where government derives its authority from the consent of the governed, to quote the Declaration of Independence—it’s a principle that really, really resonates with people. And it has, all around the world, over and over and over again, at least in the modern era, the last 200 years, changed governments and changed the way people live. There’s always been a dynamic tension. You could argue that the rise of—well, in fact, Daniel Quinn makes this argument very cogently in his book Ishmael, which is a novel, but it’s just brilliant. I used to know Dan before he passed away—that we were always largely democratic prior to the agricultural revolution. And what happened with the agricultural revolution was suddenly we went from basically everybody being involved in food production—mostly the men hunting, mostly the women gathering, but nonetheless everybody involved in food production—to a very small number of people being in charge of food production, those being the farmers. And the farmers quickly discovered that they could lock up the food. And because without food, after a couple of weeks you die, or a couple of months depending on what your stores are like in your body, this became the power of life or death. And thus came the original kings and kingdoms. It was all based on locking up the food, on controlling the critical resources—food, water, transportation, stuff like that. So I think in that context you could make the argument that the post-agricultural revolution era from 7,000 years ago up until about 200 years ago was an argument for oligarchy and kingdom and authoritarian governance. Because everybody said all these advances that we made from the Stone Age literally to the modern technological age happened during times of kings and kingdoms and emperors and princes and all that kind of stuff. I’ve heard that argument made over and over again throughout the years. And the corollary argument, which was being made in a big way during FDR’s time, was that if you try to insert too much democracy, you’re going to end up with chaos. This was Russell Kirk’s The Conservative Mind. And I think what we’ve found, what we’ve learned, is that even—or particularly maybe with the experiment of democracy in the United States and in northern Europe—high levels of democracy, high levels of diffusion of power, high levels of participatory democracy, where power flows from the bottom up, actually enhance the growth of economies and enhance the development of innovation and things like that. But there’s always been this dynamic tension between democracy and autocracy. And the autocrats—you’ve got right-wing billionaires. One famously said he’s increasingly convinced that democracy and freedom are incompatible. That was, I believe, Peter Thiel. You’ve got others saying women shouldn’t have—well, again, it was Peter Thiel—saying the biggest mistake we made was letting women vote. These are very powerful and influential people. J.D. Vance wouldn’t be vice president without Peter Thiel. And so there’s this broad skepticism about democracy among the tech bros and the dark-enlightenment figures. And I see that as probably the biggest challenge that we have going forward, outside of the Trump administration’s naked attempts to turn us into a dictatorship. Troy MillerRight. I mean, I honestly see these guys in the wings basically just allowing Trump to have a nice big playpen of whatever, knowing that he’ll be gone soon enough and then they’ll be able to implement whatever they want. And Peter Thiel has also said basically that he doesn’t know why he should have to go and appeal to people who are never going to agree with him. Let’s use technology to basically go around the institutions of politics and the democratic system and our legislation. And I’ve been saying since Project 2025 was leaked, as I recall, that this is nothing more than a blueprint for what the Powell Memo laid out in 1973 that can be implemented as swiftly as humanly possible, so there’s no potential for pushback—or it can be done swiftly enough behind Donald Trump’s chaos. But I also now see that I think they—the tech billionaires in large part, but also Singer on Wall Street and all of it—it’s the classic villains, ironically enough. And I think now they’re basically trying not only to undo the New Deal and the Great Society, which were the goals of Project 2025, but to take us all the way back to pre-Civil War America, where you can have basically a feudalized system, but the feudal system this time is a technocracy. What do you think about that? Thom HartmannI would argue that to the extent that’s the trajectory that they’re pursuing—and I would not disagree with the argument, although I’d add some nuance—I would argue that what they’re trying to do is recreate the Confederacy. What you had in 1810, 1820, the South was pretty much like the North politically. And what happened was Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin in 1797 and started marketing it in the 1810s. One machine could do the work of 50 enslaved people. It was also very expensive. And so only the biggest plantations could afford it. They got massive economies of scale, which I think is analogous to the assembly line with Henry Ford and to AI and search technology today. That technological change wiped out their small competitors and turned people into sharecroppers. People had to sell their land to the big plantations and then continue to live on that land and work it on behalf of the plantation owners. By the mid-1840s, democracy in the South had completely ended. Th

    31 min

About

Breaking down the breakdowns. blueridgebreakdown.substack.com