House of Life

Asim & Tom

House of Life explores the deeper meaning of sustainability by bridging philosophy, spirituality, and politics, challenging dogmatic thinking, and opening minds to new possibilities. holpod.com

  1. S1:E16 - UFOs, Energy, and the Future of Sustainability

    12/18/2025

    S1:E16 - UFOs, Energy, and the Future of Sustainability

    We’ve talked about some strange topics this year on House of Life and occasionally the topic of aliens rears its head. This week we decided to tackle it head on and ask: what do UFOs and potential alien disclosure have to do with sustainability? The answer, it turns out, might be everything — if, that is, the key to a sustainable future lies in energy. You might immediately dismiss any discussion of UFO’s (or UAP), but we start this discussion from the fact that there have been a number of US congressional hearings on the topic, a new bill going through congress called the ‘Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Disclosure Act of 2025’ and a growing number of government officials speaking publicly about the subject, notably in the recent documentary The Age of Disclosure. If we’re serious about exploring the depths of sustainability then, this is a topic that we need to explore with open minds, even if it is still speculative at this time. In particular we consider what advanced propulsion systems might reveal about alternative energy sources such as zero-point energy — a potentially unlimited, clean energy source. We discuss how access to energy is fundamental to human civilisation, with Asim referencing economist Steve Keen’s thesis that energy, not GDP, is the real currency of the world — explaining wars, politics, and quality of life. We ask whether breakthrough energy technology could revolutionise sustainability: from cleaning up pollution and restoring ecosystems to eliminating resource conflicts. Tom suggests that if we could harness “creative” rather than “destructive” energy — organising matter instead of blowing it up — it could solve problems the environmental movement has struggled with for decades. And then there is the question of suppression. If such an energy technology was possible, would the multi-trillion dollar fossil fuel industry, or even the nuclear and renewable industries, allow it to make them obsolete? We dig into this question. Finally, we discuss the question of whether UFO disclosure would actually change anything. Would humanity actually care if aliens were confirmed, or would just become another TikTok meme? Would unlimited access to energy change how countries behave and eliminate wars over resources? Or would the same dysfunctional behaviours continue to play out? Tom highlights physicist Hal Puthoff’s suggestion that contact might teach us “what it means to be human” in ways more profound than any technological advancement, but Asim isn’t convinced. If you’re curious, have a listen and leave us a comment to let us know what you think about the potential of this topic to expand our thinking on sustainability and human progress. And if you enjoy it, we’d be grateful if you like and share it on your preferred platform. Thanks! Thanks for listening to House of Life! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and podcast episodes. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit holpod.com

    1h 30m
  2. S1:E15 - Is AI Conscious? Exploring the Boundaries of Awareness

    12/03/2025

    S1:E15 - Is AI Conscious? Exploring the Boundaries of Awareness

    In yet another mind-bending episode of House of Life, we dive deep into one of the most intriguing questions of our time: Could AI be conscious? What starts as light-hearted banter about dubious awards and bestseller hacks evolves into a profound exploration of consciousness itself — drawing from ancient philosophies, wild scientific experiments, and modern AI debates. If you’ve ever wondered what it really means to be conscious, or why we might want to say “please” to our computers, this conversation will challenge your assumptions and spark your curiosity. This leads us into some unexpected places, exploring whether other non-human entities — whales, plants, rocks, gas clouds, mycelium networks, Gaia — might also have some form of awareness and be conscious in a way that is difficult (or maybe impossible) for us humans to comprehend. On the one hand Asim suggests that, “If consciousness is just information, then AI is more conscious than us because it’s holding a huge amount of information... It could be even a higher consciousness than humanity.” But it may be far more complex than that and Tom suggests that “To feel is to be alive... The question with AI is, can it feel?” The conversation expands to contemplate life’s purpose, morality, humanism’s pitfalls, and why assuming consciousness in everything (from plants to AI and even to plastic) might lead to a more compassionate, less destructive society. This episode is ideal for anyone fascinated by AI, philosophy, or the mysteries of the mind. Whether you’re an AI skeptic, a consciousness enthusiast, or just love thoughtful conversations, tune in to join us (Asim and Tom) on this journey of confusion and discovery. Listen now on your favourite podcast platform, and let us know: What do you think consciousness is? And do you think AI could be conscious? Drop your thoughts in the comments or on social media! And as a final note, Tom apologises for his sound quality being worse than usual. This was due to being unable to plug his podcast mic into a newer laptop that didn’t have any USB ports. An adapter is now primed and ready for future episodes! Thanks for listening to House of Life Podcast! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and podcast episodes. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit holpod.com

    1h 37m
  3. S1:E14 - Are these the End Times?

    10/16/2025

    S1:E14 - Are these the End Times?

    In episode 14 of House of Life, we reach an unexpected conclusion to our exploration of life and sustainability over the past thirteen episodes, and we get there by asking one of humanity’s oldest questions: are we approaching the end times? But rather than getting lost in doom and gloom, we take an unexpectedly illuminating journey through prophecy, fear, and what it really means to live well in uncertain times. What We Explore The discussion begins with an unusual martial art called “mad dog fist” (yes, really) before diving into the geopolitical tensions surrounding Israel, red heifers, and biblical prophecy. Tom unpacks the bizarre confluence of ancient end-times beliefs and modern politics. From there, we examine why end-times narratives are so compelling across cultures, from Abrahamic apocalypse to Hindu Yugas, Greek cycles, and Native American prophecies. We discuss the Doomsday Clock (currently closer to midnight than during the Cold War), why tech billionaires are building bunkers, and whether AI, environmental collapse, or holy war will be our undoing. But this isn’t doom-scrolling in podcast form. Quite the opposite. Asim shares eye-opening experiences from visiting Israel, and we dig into why populations become “brainwashed,” why everyone thinks they’re the “goodies,” and how fear keeps us chronically anxious rather than actually solving problems. The conversation takes an unexpected turn when we realize that perhaps the real issue isn’t which solutions we’re fighting for, but that we’re fighting at all. Unity among people might matter more than being right. Self-healing might matter more than being on the winning side of history. By the end, we arrive at a conclusion in our quest to better understand sustainability that applies as much to marriages and personal relationships as it does to global crises. It’s about something deeper than carbon targets or political victories. Something that ancient wisdom traditions understood but our modern cultures seem to have forgotten.We hope it inspires you and gives you a sense of hope and direction in these strange and challenging times. As always, we would love to hear your thoughts in the comments, and if you have been enjoying these conversations, please do share House of Life with people who you think might also enjoy it. Big thanks! Thanks for listening to House of Life! Subscribe for free to receive new episodes and articles. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit holpod.com

    1h 36m
  4. S1:E13 - Do we need to disconnect to reconnect?

    10/02/2025

    S1:E13 - Do we need to disconnect to reconnect?

    In episode 13, we explore a deceptively simple question: do we need to disconnect to reconnect? But as we quickly discover, it’s not so straightforward — what exactly are we disconnecting from, and what are we trying to reconnect to? The conversation weaves through personal experiences and bigger questions about modern life. Tom shares insights from a recent Reiki course where he experienced an unusual depth of human connection, which made him wonder: why isn’t this normal? Why do we have to seek out special experiences to feel truly present with other people? We dig into the paradox of digital connection — we’re supposedly more connected than ever through email, social media, and video calls, yet mental health problems continue rising and society feels increasingly fragmented. Email becomes a burden rather than a joy. Social media feels more like an addiction than genuine connection. Even video calls leave us exhausted in ways that in-person meetings don’t. Using Asim’s vivid metaphor of “threads” of attention, we explore how our focus gets pulled in dozens of directions simultaneously — WhatsApp notifications, unfinished email conversations, social media feeds, news cycles— leaving us perpetually distracted and unable to be fully present anywhere. It’s not just about being busy; it’s about having mental residue from incomplete conversations and unresolved threads constantly running in the background. Our discussion takes an interesting turn as we compare different types of connection to food. In-person interaction is like whole foods — rich, nourishing, full of layered information through body language, energy, and presence. Digital connection, especially social media, is more like white bread or Doritos — highly processed, easy to consume in large quantities, potentially addictive, but ultimately leaving us feeling worse despite the momentary pleasure. We go on to explore why physical presence matters so much. Drawing on psychology research, Tom explains how Zoom calls create a dissonance between what your brain thinks is happening (you’re with someone) and what your body knows (they’re not actually here), leading to that peculiar exhaustion many of you will recognise. There’s something about bioelectric fields, subtle energies, and the quality of information transfer that simply can’t be replicated digitally. The conversation touches on historical shifts too — from the last town to get television (which promptly saw all its social clubs close as people stayed home watching TV) to how the pandemic forced different kinds of disconnection and reconnection, with wildly different impacts depending on your circumstances. Towards the end, we land on a practical framework: maybe we need to actively track and measure connection quality, similar to how we track physical fitness. What if we scored different interactions — not by duration, but by how nourished or depleted they leave us feeling? A thoughtful hour-long conversation with a friend might score thousands of points, while hours of YouTube shorts might barely register despite consuming far more time. This episode offers no easy answers, but it does suggest something important: in our pursuit of endless digital connectivity, we may be sacrificing the deeper, richer forms of connection that actually nourish us. The challenge isn’t abandoning technology, but being more intentional about seeking out high-quality connection — the whole food connection instead of the junk food. As mentioned in the podcast, Tom previously proposed his '“Disconnect to Reconnect Manifesto” in episode 29 of Gillian Burke’s podcast, If I Ruled The World, which you can listen to here. Thanks for listening. Please do share this episode with anyone who may find it interesting, and join the conversation with us by leaving a comment below. Thanks for reading House of Life Podcast! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit holpod.com

    1h 27m
  5. 09/18/2025

    S1:E12 - Can we fix government?

    In this latest episode of House of Life, we tackle one of the most fundamental questions of our time: is it possible to fix governance, and if we can't come up with alternatives, do we have the right to criticise what we have? The problem with representative democracy We start by examining why our current system feels broken. Representative democracy — where we elect people to make decisions for us — consistently fails to deliver what people actually need. Politicians get institutionalised, lose touch with their constituents, and the whole thing devolves into the theatrical nonsense you see at Prime Minister's Questions. As Tom points out, what we call "democracy" today might actually be closer to what Plato warned about: demagogy. Charismatic leaders making empty promises while serving their own interests of wealth and power. Sound familiar? An alternative for today’s world Instead of electing representatives who ignore us, what if we had a system where people directly participate in decision-making through informed deliberation? Think ancient Athenian democracy, but updated for the digital age and without the slavery and disenfranchisement of women. The key insight from philosophers like Habermas: you can achieve genuine consensus through "reasoned dialogue and deliberation under ideal conditions" - where people can freely question any position, express any view, and engage without coercion. The catch? People need to be informed, engaged, and willing to have everything on the table for discussion. The adapter pattern Here's Asim's wild proposal: create a political party where the MPs are literally human placeholders. They shave their heads, wear identical clothes, change their names to numbers like "29.3", and have zero personality. Their only function is to walk into the correct voting corridor in Parliament and execute the will of the people. The real decision-making happens through participatory consensus among citizens, aided by AI to synthesize discussions and find common ground. The MPs are contractually bound to vote exactly as the membership decides, with automatic expulsion for any deviation. It's like the adapter pattern in software engineering - you need something that can interface with the existing broken system while running completely different logic underneath. The technology stack We dive into how this could actually work using current technology: * Voice-to-text input (people speak more honestly than they write) * AI analysis to identify points of agreement, disagreement, and outlier opinions * Structured deliberation focusing discussion time on areas of disagreement * Transparent, open-source systems to build trust * Personal AI assistants that could eventually represent your views on routine matters Beyond problem-solving to collective vision One of the most compelling ideas we explore: instead of just reacting to problems, what if we used this system to crowdsource collective visions for the future? What kind of community do we want Malvern or Crawley to be? What future do we want for the UK? What do we want for our global society? Having that shared vision would give the AI system a north star for evaluating decisions - not just solving today's crises, but moving incrementally toward the future people actually want. The Fundamental Problem But here's where we hit the wall: even if you fix the governance system, execution of decisions isn't guaranteed. Banks, corporations, and other power centres can simply say "computer says no" and crash the economy if they don't like what the people decide. This reveals a deeper truth - maybe there's never been real governance of any form. Maybe it's all theatre, and the reason governments don't do what we want isn't incompetence, but powerlessness against other systems. Despite these challenges, this kind of mass participatory system could still pull back the curtain on power imbalances and wake people up to how the world actually works. And sometimes, when illusions shatter, amazing transformations become possible. What's Next? Would this actually work? Could it start small at the local level and scale up? How do we prevent it from being co-opted by the very interests it threatens? We don't have all the answers, but we've sketched out a framework that could be built, tested, and evolved. The question is: are we ready to try? Listen to the episode and let us know what you think in the comments. House of Life is a podcast exploring big questions about technology, society, and human flourishing. Hosted by Tom Greenwood and Asim Hussain. Thanks for listening to House of Life. Subscribe to receive the latest episodes and articles. This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit holpod.com

    1h 43m
  6. S1:E11 - Re-Finding Balance: Genetic Pollution, Addictions, and True Abundance

    09/11/2025

    S1:E11 - Re-Finding Balance: Genetic Pollution, Addictions, and True Abundance

    In episode 11 of House of Life, we explore begin with Tom's personal health journey — from post-viral fatigue to recovery through infrared light therapy. But what starts as a discussion about cellular energy quickly expands into a broader examination of how our efficiency improvements, from LED lights to modern medicine, may be creating invisible deficiencies we don't yet understand. We find ourselves diving into the nature of viruses, challenging conventional understanding by exploring them not as living organisms but as "genetic pollution" — bits of code floating in our environment that occasionally find compatible systems to run on. This reframing connects to our view of personal and environmental health: not as a binary state but as a constant process of re-finding balance in an imbalanced world. The conversation then pivots to examine abundance versus abstinence through both personal and systemic lenses. Travel choices become a case study in the complexity of sustainable abstinence in a world engineered for consumption. We explore how religious traditions understood the value of periodic abstinence for spiritual and physical health, contrasting this with modern consumer culture's manipulation of abundance and scarcity. Once again though our conversation leads us to look at addiction as we wrestle with the central paradox of sustainability messaging: we ask people to abstain from things specifically designed to be addictive, while the systems creating those addictions remain largely unchallenged. The episode concludes by examining how inner abundance — a sense of spiritual and emotional fullness — might be the ultimate defence against manufactured dependencies. Thanks for reading House of Life Podcast! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work. Share your thoughts We love hearing your thoughts so please do leave a comment on Substack or tag us on Linked in (Tom Greenwood & Asim Hussain). Here’s some things to think about: * How might our optimisation for efficiency be creating invisible deficiencies in other areas of life? * What might change in your consumption patterns if you viewed them through the lens of addiction? * What approaches have you found to cultivate inner abundance in your own life? This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit holpod.com

    1h 36m
  7. S1:E10 - Is the Jevons Paradox a genuine limit to sustainability?

    09/04/2025

    S1:E10 - Is the Jevons Paradox a genuine limit to sustainability?

    What if the very efficiency improvements we champion in sustainability actually increase resource consumption? The Jevons Paradox suggests this troubling possibility. However, we dive deep into the historical evidence and find yet another paradox, that this increase in resource consumption seems to go hand in hand with genuine social progress. In this episode our conversation spirals through economics, addiction, power dynamics, and the fundamental question: if resource consumption improves human lives, how do we balance that with protecting the environment?Through our exploration we find that there may be limits to the Jevons paradox that would allow us to transcend it, enabling social and environmental progress to go hand in hand, but first we must overcome the power of vested interests that benefit from ever growing consumption. Thanks for listening to House of Life. Subscribe for free to be updated about new episodes. Share your thoughts We love hearing your thoughts so please do leave a comment on Substack or tag us on Linked in (Tom Greenwood & Asim Hussain). Here’s some things to think about: * Where do you see increased consumption actually helping improve human welfare? * Have you noticed the difference between genuine needs and manufactured wants in your own consumption patterns? * Can you see hidden addictions in society, or your own life, driving unnecessary consumption? Thanks for listening! This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit holpod.com

    1h 42m
  8. S1:E9 - The $500 Billion AI Gamble

    07/31/2025

    S1:E9 - The $500 Billion AI Gamble

    In episode 9 of the House of Life podcast, Asim lead’s us into the high-stakes world of AI investment, exploring OpenAI's audacious $500 billion Stargate project and its implications. Together we unpack the "money moat" strategy, where vast wealth is used to dominate industries, questioning whether this reflects true capitalism or a modern feudalism. The conversation spans the societal impact of AI, the concentration of power in mega-corporations, the implications of unlimited money to dominate society, and the potential for smaller, AI-empowered organizations to reshape the future of work. We even get into the question of whether employment is an inherently unnatural relationship for humans to live in as well as whether some environmental initiatives are hijacked to benefit the consolidation of wealth and power. With candid insights into human ambition, trauma, and systemic inequality, we do what we always do and seek new insights on technology, sustainability, and life.As always, we would love to hear your perspectives so please do leave a comment or share the podcast with your thoughts on your favourite platform. P.S. I’ve been trying out various different styles of these emails (show notes) to see what works best. I’d love to know how they land with you as listeners, so drop me a note. Thanks! Tom This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit holpod.com

    1h 22m

About

House of Life explores the deeper meaning of sustainability by bridging philosophy, spirituality, and politics, challenging dogmatic thinking, and opening minds to new possibilities. holpod.com