This Week In Palestine

Truth and Justice Radio
  • 5.0 (1)
  • Politics

"This podcast sheds light on the daily struggles faced by Palestinians since the loss of their homeland. We bring you in-depth discussions and factual insights into the suffering endured by the indigenous people under a fascist state that continues to expand and claim their lands."  

  1. 4d ago

    TWIP-260920 The Invisible Hand: How the Israel Lobby Shapes Power in Washington

    Today we open a chapter of American politics that is often whispered about, rarely confronted, and almost never acknowledged openly. It is the story of how a foreign‑policy lobby — powerful, organized, well‑funded, and deeply embedded in Washington — has shaped the direction of the United States for decades. It is the story of how the Israel lobby became one of the most influential political forces in America, capable of steering debates, silencing dissent, and defining what can and cannot be said in the halls of power. This is not a story about individuals. It is a story about a system. A network of think tanks, advocacy groups, donors, media relationships, and political pressure that has woven itself into the fabric of U.S. policymaking. A system that ensures military aid flows without question, diplomatic cover is provided without pause, and political loyalty is rewarded without hesitation. A system that has convinced Congress that supporting Israel is not a foreign‑policy choice, but a political necessity. For decades, lawmakers have learned that criticizing Israeli policy carries consequences. Careers stall. Committees are lost. Donors disappear. Media narratives shift. And so, silence becomes the safest path. Compliance becomes the easiest path. And unconditional support becomes the expected path. The result is a foreign policy that often reflects the priorities of the lobby more than the interests of the American public. This influence is not subtle. It is visible in the billions of dollars in military aid approved every year. It is visible in the diplomatic protection offered at the United Nations. It is visible in the way presidential candidates speak about Israel with identical language, as if reading from the same script. It is visible in the way journalists, academics, and analysts are pressured, attacked, or marginalized when they challenge the narrative. And it is visible in the wars America enters, the alliances it chooses, and the crises it escalates. From the Middle East to the Persian Gulf, from Iran to Lebanon, from Gaza to the West Bank, U.S. policy often mirrors the strategic priorities of Israel more closely than the strategic interests of the United States. Today, we revisit this story not to provoke, not to generalize, and not to target any community. We revisit it to understand how power works. How influence is built. How narratives are shaped. And how a lobby became strong enough to guide the foreign policy of a superpower. Because understanding the Israel lobby is not about blame. It is about clarity. It is about recognizing the forces that shape America’s decisions abroad and the silence that surrounds them at home. It is about asking who benefits, who pays the price, and who decides the direction of a nation that claims to act in the name of democracy. And today, we begin that conversation. If you have thoughts, I want to hear them.  Email me at TWIPpodcasts@gmail.com and tell me how you see it. This is This Week in Palestine.

  2. Sep 13

    TWIP-260913 The Wars Behind the Mask: How History Was Rewritten to Protect a Narrative

    Today we revisit a moment in history when Israel claimed to be the victim of an attack by its neighbors, blaming them for daring to free their own occupied land in the Golan Heights of Syria and the Sinai Peninsula of Egypt. The October War, known in the West as the Yom Kippur War, was not a sudden act of aggression. It was a coordinated attempt by Arab nations to reclaim territories taken in 1967, territories recognized by the world as occupied. Egypt crossed the Suez Canal to retake Sinai. Syria launched a massive offensive to recover the Golan Heights. For the Arab world, this was not an invasion. It was self‑defense. It was liberation. It was the restoration of land that had been seized and held under military rule. Yet even in this context, Israel presented itself as the victim. It framed the war as an unprovoked attack timed to exploit a religious holiday. It shaped the narrative so that the world saw only surprise and danger, not occupation and resistance. This pattern did not begin in 1973. It stretches back decades, into the very foundations of the conflict. In 1946, long before Israel became a state, the King David Hotel in Jerusalem was bombed by the Irgun paramilitary organization. The explosion killed ninety‑one people. British officials, staff, civilians, Jews, Palestinians. The dead were not soldiers. They were administrators, clerks, hotel workers, and visitors. It was one of the deadliest attacks of the British Mandate period. Yet over time, the event was reframed, softened, justified, or buried beneath a larger narrative of victimhood. Two decades later, in 1967, the USS Liberty, an American Navy intelligence ship, was attacked in international waters. Israeli aircraft and torpedo boats struck the vessel repeatedly. Rockets, machine‑gun fire, napalm. When the assault ended, thirty‑four American sailors were dead and one hundred seventy‑one were wounded. The United States never received a clear explanation. Families never received closure. And the world moved on, as if the deaths of American servicemen were a footnote rather than a tragedy. These events reveal a pattern in how wars involving Israel have been remembered. A pattern where the state presents itself as the perpetual victim, even in moments when its own actions caused devastation. A pattern where history is edited, where context is removed, where occupation is erased, and where retaliation is portrayed as aggression. A pattern where the suffering of others is overshadowed by a narrative crafted for political survival. Today, we revisit these moments not to inflame hatred and not to generalize about any people. We revisit them to understand how states shape memory, how governments rewrite history, and how narratives become shields that protect power. Because the wars with Israel cannot be understood through slogans or headlines. They must be understood through the events that were forgotten, the stories that were buried, and the truths that were never allowed to surface. If you have thoughts, I want to hear them.  Email me at TWIPpodcasts@gmail.com and tell me how you see it. This is This Week in Palestine.

  3. Sep 6

    TWIP-260906 The War We Never Needed: How America Lost Its Allies, Its Power, and Its Purpose

    Today we begin with a question that every American should be asking, a question that echoes through every ruined base, every broken alliance, every shattered promise: Why are we in war with Iran? And why, somehow, are we in conflict with half the world? How did a nation that once led through diplomacy, alliances, and economic strength become a nation defined by endless wars, sanctions, tariffs, and isolation? How did we go from building bridges to burning them? From leading coalitions to losing them? From being respected to being feared, and then resented? The Iran war did not begin with strategy. It began with arrogance. It began with the belief that America could reshape the Middle East with missiles, threats, and pressure. It began with the fantasy that Iran would collapse under sanctions, that its alliances would crumble, that its people would turn against their government. Instead, Iran grew stronger. Its networks expanded. Its influence deepened. And America found itself fighting a war it could not win, against a country that never attacked it. But Iran was only the beginning. Tariffs followed, sweeping, punishing tariffs that struck not enemies, but allies. Europe, Canada, Mexico, South Korea, Japan, China, nations that stood with us for decades, suddenly found themselves treated as adversaries. Their industries were hit. Their economies strained. Their trust shattered. They watched America weaponize trade, not against dictators, but against partners. And slowly, quietly, they began to walk away. Countries that once relied on American leadership began building their own alliances. Countries that once trusted American promises began preparing for American abandonment. Countries that once feared American power began doubting American competence. And then came the war, the war with Iran that spiraled into a regional collapse. Bases destroyed. Supply lines broken. Allies refusing to host American forces. Nations refusing to join American coalitions. The world watched the United States stumble into a conflict it did not understand, did not prepare for, and could not control. Why are we in war with Iran? Because we chose ideology over strategy. Why are we in conflict with the world? Because we chose tariffs over diplomacy. Because we chose pressure over partnership. Because we chose dominance over cooperation. And now, America stands more isolated than at any point in modern history, not because the world turned against us, but because we pushed the world away. This brings us to the conversation that every American must hear the one with John Mearsheimer, one of the most respected foreign‑policy scholars alive. In his discussion with Chris Hedges, Mearsheimer lays out the truth with brutal clarity: The Iran war is the biggest strategic blunder in U.S. history. He explains how the war destroyed American credibility, empowered Iran, fractured alliances, drained billions, and exposed the limits of American military power. He shows how the United States misread the region, misunderstood its enemies, and overestimated its own strength. He reveals how lobby networks, ideological pressure, and political delusion pushed America into a conflict that served no national interest. And he warns that great powers do not fall because they are defeated. Great powers fall because they make catastrophic decisions and refuse to admit they were wrong. Today, we stand inside the consequences of those decisions. Today, we live in the shadow of a war that never should have happened. Today, we confront the cost of arrogance, isolation, and empire. And now, with the stage set, with the truth laid bare, with the questions finally asked, we turn to the conversation that explains how America lost its way, and how it might still find a path back. If you have thoughts, I want to hear them.  Email me at TWIPpodcasts@gmail.com and tell me how you see it. This is This Week in Palestine.

  4. Aug 30

    TWIP-260830 The Price of Truth: Journalists Killed in Palestine and the War on Those Who Refuse to Lie

    Today we speak about a truth that carries weight heavier than any headline, heavier than any broadcast, heavier than any political statement: the truth that journalists in Palestine are being killed simply for doing their job. Not for carrying weapons. Not for joining militias. Not for taking sides. They are killed for holding a camera, for carrying a notebook, for telling the world what is happening to a people under siege. The list of names is long, and every name is a life, a story, a voice that was silenced because it dared to reveal what others wanted hidden. Shireen Abu Akleh, shot while wearing a press vest, a helmet, and standing with other journalists. Her death was not an accident. It was a message: even the most respected Palestinian‑American reporter, even a veteran of Al Jazeera, even a woman known across the world for her integrity, could be killed with impunity. Yaser Murtaja, a young journalist whose drone footage showed Gaza’s suffering from above. He was shot while filming protests, wearing a vest clearly marked “PRESS.” He dreamed of traveling the world. Instead, the world watched him die. Ahmed Abu Hussein, shot by a sniper while covering demonstrations. He fought for weeks before succumbing to his wounds. His last photos showed children running from tear gas. Rami Al‑Sheikh, killed while documenting the aftermath of airstrikes. His final footage captured families searching through rubble for their loved ones. Mohammed Abu Hatab, killed with his entire family after reporting on the destruction of homes. Hours earlier, he had stood in front of a camera describing the fear of Gaza’s civilians. That fear became his reality. Issam Abdallah, a Reuters videographer, killed while filming from a clearly marked press position. His colleagues screamed his name as the second strike hit. These are not isolated tragedies. They are part of a pattern, a deliberate targeting of journalists who refuse to look away. More than three hundred Palestinian journalists have been killed in recent years, many in the last months alone. Some died while filming. Some died while sheltering. Some died with their families. All died because they insisted on telling the truth. But the war on journalism does not end in Gaza. It extends into the newsrooms of the West, where truth is not killed with bullets, it is killed with silence. Western media institutions have perfected a quieter form of censorship: firing, sidelining, demoting, or forcing out reporters who refuse to sanitize the suffering of Palestinians. Mehdi Hasan, one of the most incisive interviewers in American media, was pushed out after refusing to soften his criticism of Israel’s assault on Gaza. His questions were too sharp. His insistence on naming Palestinian humanity too uncomfortable for a network that preferred “balance” over accuracy. Ayman Mohyeldin, who spent years reporting from Gaza, was repeatedly sidelined for coverage that humanized Palestinians too effectively. His lived experience became a liability in a newsroom that wanted distance, not truth. Emily Wilder, fired by the Associated Press for expressing sympathy for Palestinians, not in her reporting, but in her personal life. Her dismissal sent a message to every young journalist: your conscience is a threat. Tareq Haddad, who resigned from Newsweek after the outlet refused to publish his reporting on U.S. and U.K. misconduct. He was told to stay quiet. He chose to walk away. Abby Martin, removed from mainstream platforms for refusing to sanitize Israeli policy. Her voice was too direct, too honest, too unwilling to play the game. And now Ana Maria Monjardino, who left CNN after witnessing how Palestinian voices were filtered, minimized, or erased. She saw how editorial pressure shaped narratives, how certain truths were discouraged, how certain guests were avoided. She chose integrity over a high‑paying career. These journalists did not leave because they were weak. They left because they were strong. They left because truth mattered more than a contract. They left because Palestine mattered more than silence. The pattern is unmistakable: In Palestine, journalists are killed. In the West, journalists are silenced. One system uses bullets. The other uses careers. Both serve the same purpose to control the narrative. But despite the danger, despite the pressure, despite the consequences, journalists continue to speak. They continue to film. They continue to write. They continue to stand in front of cameras even when the cameras become targets. Because they understand something the world often forgets: Without journalists, there is no witness. Without witnesses, there is no truth. Without truth, there is no justice. And today, we honor them, the ones who died, the ones who were fired, the ones who walked away, and the ones who continue to risk everything so the world cannot say, “We did not know.” If you have thoughts, I want to hear them.  Email me at TWIPpodcasts@gmail.com and tell me how you see it. This is This Week in Palestine.

  5. Aug 25

    TWIP-260823 The Hidden Architecture of Power: What They Never Wanted Us to See

    Today we open a door into a world that has been deliberately kept in the shadows, a world of alliances, cults, collapses, and confrontations that shape global politics far more than any headline ever admits. This episode brings together five stories, five investigations, five revelations that expose the machinery behind the chaos we are living through now. Earlier, I was listening to Olivia Swing, sharp, unfiltered, relentless. She walks straight into the subjects others avoid, and in her latest work she exposes the cult surrounding Israel, a political force so powerful it bends institutions, silences dissent and reshapes American policy without ever being named. She reveals how loyalty to Israel has become a doctrine inside Western politics enforced through pressure, money, and fear,  and how this cult is now fracturing the American right from within. Then we move to the Iran connection no one is talking about a network of influence built not through war, but through patience, leverage, and strategic pressure points across the Gulf, Asia, Europe, and even inside the United States. Iran’s power is not loud. It is structural. It is embedded in energy routes, alliances, cyber capabilities, and the mistakes of its enemies. It is a rise the world pretends not to see. From there, we shift to a story shaking the region: Turkey’s military rise and Israel’s growing fear, intensified by Trump arming Ankara with systems that tilt the balance of power. Turkey’s drones dominate battlefields. Its navy expands. Its alliances deepen. Its rhetoric sharpens. Israel watches a rival emerge, not a distant threat, but a regional force capable of challenging its dominance. The question becomes unavoidable: is confrontation coming? And then we confront the collapse of a myth: the suffocation of the American military machine. Not through defeat, but through logistics, broken supply lines, outdated factories, vulnerable networks, and a military giant unable to sustain itself in real conflict. The empire is not falling from the outside. It is choking from within. Finally, we arrive at the conversation of the century, a reimagined broadcast that ties all these threads together. A conversation about power, fear, alliances, and the narratives that governments use to keep the public distracted while the real decisions happen behind closed doors. These stories are not separate. They are one system. One architecture. One hidden map of how the world truly works. And today, we bring it into the light. If you have thoughts, I want to hear them.  Email me at TWIPpodcasts@gmail.com and tell me how you see it. This is This Week in Palestine.

  6. Aug 16

    TWIP-260816 The Empire on Its Knees: From Trump’s Iran Gamble to the Fall of American Power

    Today, we open with a truth many in Washington refuse to face: Trump’s Iran war is bringing down the American empire. Not slowly. Not quietly. But in real time, in front of the world, in ways that expose the fragility of a superpower that once believed it could reshape the Middle East with a single strike. The Iran confrontation was supposed to be a show of dominance. Instead, it became a mirror reflecting American decline. A war of choice that revealed a nation overstretched, overconfident, and unprepared for the consequences of its own aggression. And while the empire trembles, the Gulf is rewriting its own destiny. Let’s see how the Gulf countries once obedient allies, are reshaping their stance. Saudi Arabia negotiating with Iran. Qatar refusing to bend. Turkey rising. And the UAE, the country that always played both sides, suddenly scrambling to bail itself out of Iran’s reach. Deals whispered in back rooms. Gold shipments rumored. Diplomacy conducted in shadows. A quiet panic disguised as strategy. Then comes Senator Chris Murphy one of the few voices in Washington willing to speak without fear. Murphy exposes what others tiptoe around: Trump enriching himself and his inner circle while the region burns. Contracts. Backdoor deals. Foreign money flowing into private pockets. Murphy lays it out plainly, revealing a network of self‑interest wrapped in the language of patriotism. And while Washington argues, the Mecca Pact shifts the balance of power. Turkey emerges from the pact with a new mandate, a moral, political, and symbolic authority over Israel that Tel Aviv never expected. A pact that turns Gaza from a tragedy into a rallying point. A pact that signals the Islamic world is no longer willing to watch from the sidelines. A pact that gives Ankara leverage it has not held in decades. But nothing captures the collapse of American power more than the final image, the one the world cannot unsee. Trump, humiliated, hiding in a food truck. A president sealed inside a metal box meant for plastic trays and catering carts. And outside? His entire administration left behind as a decoy. Exposed. Abandoned. Used as human cover while he disappeared into the shadows. A leader hiding. A team sacrificed. An empire trembling. This is where our story begins.  If you have thoughts, I want to hear them.  Email me at TWIPpodcasts@gmail.com and tell me how you see it. This is This Week in Palestine.

  7. Aug 9

    TWIP-260809 Fear as a Weapon: Unmasking the Settler Panic and the Politics Behind It

    Today, we step into a subject that exposes the raw nerves of a nation, the fear gripping its settlers, and the political narratives shaping the conflict. It is a subject that forces us to confront the violence unfolding across Palestinian towns, the ideological machinery behind it, and the way fear is transformed into justification. This is not a polite exploration. It is not softened. It is not designed to protect anyone’s comfort. It is designed to reveal. Across the West Bank, settler rampages have erupted with alarming intensity. Homes burned. Cars torched. Families forced to flee in the middle of the night. Videos show masked figures marching with rifles, chanting threats, attacking civilians, and leaving behind trails of destruction. Israeli human rights organizations describe these attacks as coordinated and deliberate. Palestinians describe them as terror. And today, we must try to understand what fuels this violence, and why it is escalating now. The first layer of this subject is fear, not only as an emotion but as a political tool. Settlers claim they are terrified, living under constant threat, surrounded by enemies. They frame their actions as self-defense, as survival, as a response to existential danger. But fear, when politicized, becomes something else. It becomes a shield that excuses aggression. It becomes a narrative that transforms perpetrators into victims. It becomes a justification for rampage. Let’s see how this fear is shaped. Settlers live in fortified enclaves, protected by military units, armed with rifles, supported by state funding, and backed by political leadership. They travel in armored vehicles. They receive infrastructure and protection that Palestinians do not. Yet they describe themselves as vulnerable and besieged. This fear is not only emotional; it is ideological. It is cultivated through education, religious narratives, and political rhetoric that frame Palestinians as existential threats. It is reinforced by leaders who portray settlement expansion as both a right and a necessity. But fear does not erase responsibility. Fear does not justify burning homes. Fear does not excuse collective punishment. And fear does not belong exclusively to one side. Palestinian families endure settler attacks without protection, without recourse, without justice. Their fear is lived, daily, and unshielded. It belongs to those who have no army, no state, no armored vehicles, and no political backing. The second layer of this subject is history, not as a neutral record but as a tool that can be weaponized. Some argue that violence is inevitable, that the conflict is predetermined, that resistance is simply refusal to accept reality. This framing reduces the conflict to fate rather than political choice. It erases Palestinian agency, suffering, and rights. It suggests that settlement expansion, occupation, and displacement are natural outcomes of history rather than deliberate policies. But history is not destiny. History can be selective. History can be used to absolve power. And today, we confront the fact that invoking history to justify present-day oppression is a political strategy, not a historical truth. The third layer of this subject is militarization, specifically the shockwaves created by reports of Hamas acquiring weapons through regional networks and smuggling routes. These revelations have sparked outrage and fear. Some claim these weapons justify harsher measures, justify occupation, justify settler violence. Others argue that armed resistance emerges from decades of siege, displacement, and structural violence. But today, we must ask: Does militarization justify occupation? Does resistance justify rampage? Does fear justify erasure? The heart of this subject is truth, who defines it, who controls it, and who pays the price when truth becomes dangerous. The conflict is not only fought on land. It is fought through narratives. Through fear. Through memory. Through the stories that are amplified and the stories that are buried. Violence does not emerge from a vacuum. Fear does not justify rampage. History does not absolve oppression. Weapons do not erase rights. Now, let’s see where this leaves us. Settlers say they are terrified. Palestinians say they are terrorized. Some claim violence is inevitable. Others insist justice is possible. And many warn that truth is being buried beneath fear, ideology, and political convenience. Today, we step into that discomfort. Today, we examine the claims. Today, we confront the contradictions. Today, we look directly at the fear, the anger, the history, and the humanity at the center of this conflict. This is not just a subject. It is a mirror reflecting a nation on edge and a people under fire. If you have thoughts, I want to hear them. Email me at TWIPpodcasts@gmail.com and tell me how you see it. This is This Week in Palestine.

  8. Aug 2

    TWIP-260802 The Holocaust Was Weaponised To Justify Genocide

    Today, we confront a claim that shakes the foundations of modern political discourse. A claim made by an Israeli scholar who argues that one of history’s greatest tragedies has been transformed into a political shield. A shield used not to protect the memory of victims, but to justify violence against another people. This is not an easy conversation. It is not comfortable. It is not meant to be. This is a clear discussion between Owen Jones, a British journalist and political commentator known for confronting power structures and exposing state‑sanctioned injustice, and his guest Omer Bartov, an Israeli‑American historian specializing in genocide studies and the manipulation of collective memory. Even though I believe that Omer Bartov takes the side of Israel, this discussion is very important because it reveals the Palestinian situation and their struggle against Israeli political narratives. Let’s try to understand how a historical trauma became a political instrument. The Holocaust stands as one of humanity’s darkest chapters. Millions murdered. Families erased. Communities destroyed. The world vowed “never again.” Never again to genocide. Never again to dehumanization. Never again to silence in the face of mass suffering. But today, some scholars argue that this vow has been twisted. That “never again” has been weaponized into “never question.” That the memory of Jewish suffering has been used to shield a state from accountability, even when its actions mirror the very horrors the world promised to prevent. Now, let’s see how this transformation happened. In the decades following World War II, Israel positioned itself as the inheritor of Jewish trauma. The state became synonymous with Jewish identity, Jewish survival, and Jewish memory. Any criticism of Israeli policy was framed as an attack on Jewish existence itself. The Holocaust became not only a historical event, but a political tool. A tool used to silence dissent, deflect scrutiny, and delegitimize anyone who spoke about Palestinian suffering. According to the scholar at the center of this discussion, this weaponisation did not happen overnight. It evolved through education systems, diplomatic strategies, media narratives, and global alliances. It evolved through the insistence that Israel must always be seen as a victim, even when it holds overwhelming military power. It evolved through the idea that Jewish trauma is eternal, while Palestinian trauma is negotiable, dismissible, or invisible. Let’s try to understand the consequences of this narrative. When Palestinian homes are demolished, the world is told it is security. When Palestinian children are killed, the world is told it is self‑defense. When entire neighborhoods are flattened, the world is told it is necessary. And when anyone questions these explanations, they are accused of hatred, extremism, or denial of Jewish suffering. The Holocaust becomes a rhetorical shield, raised not to honor the dead, but to silence the living. Today, we examine how this shield has shaped global politics. Governments hesitate to condemn Israeli actions because they fear being labeled antisemitic. Media outlets soften language to avoid backlash. Universities punish students who speak about Palestinian rights. Human‑rights organizations are attacked for documenting violations. The scholar argues that this climate of fear is not accidental. It is engineered. It is maintained. It is enforced. Let’s see what this enforcement looks like. A journalist publishes evidence of war crimes. Their career is threatened. A professor teaches about settler colonialism. Their contract is not renewed. A student group organizes a protest. Their funding is revoked. A survivor of violence speaks publicly. Their testimony is dismissed as propaganda. The Holocaust becomes a political firewall, blocking accountability and protecting power. But today, we confront a different truth. The scholar insists that honoring the Holocaust means preventing all genocide, not just the genocide of one people. Honoring the Holocaust means recognizing the humanity of all victims, not only those whose suffering fits political narratives. Honoring the Holocaust means refusing to allow its memory to justify new cycles of violence. Now, let’s try to understand the heart of this argument. The scholar is not denying the Holocaust. He is not diminishing Jewish suffering. He is not attacking Jewish identity. He is confronting the way trauma has been manipulated to justify oppression. He is confronting the way history has been turned into a weapon. He is confronting the way “never again” has been selectively applied. Today, we step into this uncomfortable space. Today, we examine the claim that the Holocaust has been weaponized. Today, we ask what happens when memory becomes a political tool. Today, we ask what happens when trauma becomes a shield for violence. Today, we ask what happens when truth becomes dangerous. Let’s see where this leads. Let’s try to understand what this scholar is revealing. Let’s listen carefully, because the implications reach far beyond Israel and Palestine. They reach into the very question of how societies remember, how they justify, and how they repeat the tragedies they claim to oppose. This is the battle over free speech. This is the battle over historical memory. This is the battle over truth. And today, we confront it head on. If you have thoughts, I want to hear them.  Email me at TWIPpodcasts@gmail.com and tell me how you see it. This is This Week in Palestine.

See All (85)

Ratings & Reviews

About

"This podcast sheds light on the daily struggles faced by Palestinians since the loss of their homeland. We bring you in-depth discussions and factual insights into the suffering endured by the indigenous people under a fascist state that continues to expand and claim their lands."  

Information

  • Creator
    Truth and Justice Radio
  • Years Active
    2025 - 2026
  • Episodes
    85
  • Rating
    Clean
  • Copyright
    © 2026 This Week In Palestine
  • Show Website
    This Week In Palestine

You Might Also Like