The Tyler Woodward Project | Media & Radio Insights

Tyler Woodward

The Tyler Woodward Project is a weekly show about how technology, media, and radio infrastructure shape the world around us, told through the lens of a broadcast engineer who grew up with dial-up internet, FM and AM static, and the rise of the algorithm. Each episode unpacks the systems, signals, and corporate decisions behind how we communicate, listen, and connect, cutting through the marketing fluff and tech-industry spin. Expect sharp analysis, grounded storytelling, a touch of broadcast nostalgia, and clear explanations that make the technical human again.

  1. Why Podcasting Metrics Matter: Understanding the RSS Enclosure Tag

    5d ago

    Why Podcasting Metrics Matter: Understanding the RSS Enclosure Tag

    The Hidden Structure of Podcasting: Why It Matters Turns out, the core of podcasting isn't just about the content — it's about a tiny XML tag that nobody owns but everyone depends on. That one tag keeps the entire industry running, yet it leaves questions about measurement and control hanging in the air. In this episode: The origins of RSS and the enclosure tag Why no one owns the main infrastructure How platforms like Spotify tried to control the medium The complexity of measuring listens versus downloads What's new with Podcasting 2.0 and open extensions The implications for independence and platform risk Timestamps: 00:00 - The mystery of podcast download counts 00:21 - The birth of RSS and the enclosure tag 00:51 - How the enclosure tag revolutionized podcasting 02:04 - Who built the podcasting infrastructure? Nobody owns it. 03:56 - The basics of how podcast feeds work 04:37 - The difference between downloads and listens 06:14 - Radio vs podcast measurement methods 07:07 - How server logs improve download accuracy 08:07 - Spotify's big spend to control the medium 09:12 - The failure of platform-dependent exclusivity 10:29 - What's new with Podcasting 2.0 11:41 - The ongoing struggle to measure audience engagement 12:28 - The importance of openness for independence Resources & Links: RSS 2.0 Specification Adam Curry & Dave Jones' Podcasting 2.0 Spotify's Acquisition of Podsites Lightning Payments for Podcasts Connect with Tyler: Threads Instagram BlueSky

    14 min
  2. Understanding RDS: The Hidden Backbone of FM Radio

    May 18

    Understanding RDS: The Hidden Backbone of FM Radio

    You press your ear to the radio and wonder what’s buried in the static. Turns out, there’s a tiny data protocol still riding shotgun inside FM signals after all these years—RDS and RBDS. It’s the reason your car’s dashboard knows what’s playing, and it’s holding up a lot more than most folks realize. Key topics: History of RDS/RBDS Technical workings of RDS/RBDS Impact of RDS on modern radio and vehicles Timestamps: 00:00 Introduction to RDS and RBDS 06:41 The Role of RDS in FM Radio 13:24 Future of RDS and Its Importance Resources & Links: RDS Spy — Free RDS decoder tool Omnia 9 Processor — Audio processor with embedded RDS Nautel Exciter — RDS built-in Orban Optimod 5950 — Combines audio processing and RDS Connect with Tyler: Bluesky Threads Instagram

    17 min
  3. Cable News Is Not a Radio Product

    May 15 ·  Bonus

    Cable News Is Not a Radio Product

    This is my opinion as someone who works in broadcasting and spends probably too much time thinking about radio. Take it for what it is. Cable news channels have the infrastructure, the staff, the brand recognition, and the content volume to build genuinely compelling audio products. They have people who know how to talk and news gathering operations most radio stations can only dream of. Instead, they route the 24/7 TV audio feed to a streaming platform and call it done. CNN is on TuneIn. Fox News is on SiriusXM. MSNBC has a linear feed on TuneIn. You can listen to all of them. But listening to TV without the picture isn't the same thing as audio, and the fact that you can technically do it doesn't make it a radio product. Real audio is built around the assumption that you cannot see anything. The writing accounts for it. The pacing accounts for it. When something visual happens, someone describes it. When there's a graphic, someone reads it. When there's a clip, the anchor sets it up so you know what you're about to hear and why it matters. None of that is complicated, but all of it is deliberate. TV assumes you're watching. When an anchor says "as you can see here" and pauses while a map fills the screen, audio listeners get silence and no idea what they were supposed to be seeing. When a breaking news chyron goes up, nobody reads it aloud because everyone in the studio assumes you can see it. That's not a small problem. That's the whole product. The proof that it can be done differently isn't hard to find. WTOP in Washington D.C. has been running commercial all-news radio since 1969. Traffic and weather on a regular cycle, written for listeners, paced for listeners, ads sold against all of it. It consistently ranks as the highest-rated station in the D.C. market -- not the highest-rated news station, the highest-rated station period -- and has the Murrow Awards to back it up. The BBC and CBC get brought up in conversations like this because they did the same thing at a larger scale. BBC Radio and CBC Radio were built as distinct operations from their television sides, written and produced specifically for listeners. CBC Radio has been commercial-free since 1974. Those funding models are real differences, and anyone who says they don't matter is wrong. But WTOP is right there as evidence that the commercial-free argument is a deflection. The question was never about the funding model. It was about whether you treat audio as its own discipline or as a TV byproduct. If the business case for a fully produced commercial feed is still a tough sell, SiriusXM and TuneIn already have the infrastructure for tiered models. That's not a novel idea. Neither the production problem nor the monetization problem is actually hard to solve. MSNBC is worth noting because they're doing both things simultaneously. Their podcast operation is legitimate. Rachel Maddow Presents: Ultra earned an Edward R. Murrow Award in 2025, and those narrative series are produced for ears, not repurposed from TV. The criticism isn't about that work. It's specifically about the live 24/7 feed that gets dumped on a streaming platform and called radio. The national news audio space isn't crowded. Public radio serves a different mission. There's real room for a cable news operation to build something audio-first. The audience exists. The content pipeline exists. The talent exists. What's missing is the decision to treat the live feed as something other than a TV byproduct. Nobody is choosing TuneIn CNN because it's a great radio product. They're there because it's available and the brand is familiar. That's inertia, not a product strategy. WTOP has been answering this question since 1969. Cable news just hasn't bothered to ask it.

    7 min
  4. What’s Really Happening to AM Radio: The Infrastructure Side No One Talks About

    May 11

    What’s Really Happening to AM Radio: The Infrastructure Side No One Talks About

    The fight over AM radio isn’t about whether you listen to it — it’s about what happens when the infrastructure it relies on looks like a pile of scrap metal. Despite a steady decline in licenses and increasingly valuable real estate, AM's role in emergency warning and national security remains critical. But for how much longer? You’ll discover how radio towers are worth more than their signals, why copper theft gets more dangerous for stations, and what’s really behind the push to yank AM from new cars. The story isn’t about consumer habits. It’s about infrastructure, national safety, and whether this relic can survive the next ten years or get turned into a parking lot. The federal government and emergency responders say AM radio is vital — when the internet goes down, it’s still on. But private companies are choosing real estate over airwaves, and big bills to save AM are sitting in Congress waiting for a vote. In a world obsessed with bandwidth, AM is proving it’s still a lifeline when things get bad. If you care about national security, emergency preparedness, or how an entire industry collapses while the government talks about “modernizing,” this is your window into what’s really happening under the hood. AM isn’t dead yet — but it might be dead soon if nobody pays attention.

    14 min
  5. Ted Turner Didn’t Just Build a Network. He Exploited a Satellite Loophole.

    May 7 ·  Bonus

    Ted Turner Didn’t Just Build a Network. He Exploited a Satellite Loophole.

    Ted Turner died on May 6, 2026. He was 87. Most of the tributes are going to focus on CNN, on the Gulf War coverage, on the $1 billion he gave to the United Nations. All of that is real and worth discussing. But from a broadcast technology perspective, the most interesting thing Ted Turner ever did happened on December 17, 1976, at a satellite uplink in Atlanta. That's the day he beamed a struggling UHF station up to RCA's Satcom 1 and turned local television into something the industry hadn't named yet. WTCG was Channel 17 in Atlanta, a money-losing UHF station Turner had acquired six years earlier in exchange for a couple of radio properties. UHF was a graveyard in 1970. Turner programmed it cheap and scrappy: old movies, reruns, wrestling, and Atlanta Braves games. He made it profitable by 1973 on pure volume and low rates. What changed was HBO. In September 1975, HBO transmitted the Ali-Frazier "Thrilla in Manila" fight up to Satcom 1 and back down to cable headends across the country. It was the first commercial satellite delivery of a cable signal in the United States. Turner saw it and immediately understood what it meant: the satellite didn't care where your signal came from or what size your market was. If you had an uplink and the connection, your local station was suddenly everywhere. The regulatory framework had not caught up to this idea. Turner's lawyer found a gap: a 1972 FCC "Open Skies" policy had deregulated domestic satellite use to encourage competition. Nobody had thought to close the loophole that let a local broadcaster use that infrastructure to distribute nationally. Turner didn't wait for permission. He negotiated transponder time on Satcom 1 for roughly $1 million a year, built a ground station at the transmitter site, and on December 17, 1976, WTCG went national. Cable operators had a real problem: they were selling subscriptions but didn't have enough content to justify the price. Turner solved it. WTCG was advertiser-supported, so retransmission was free, and the FCC's distant signal rules had never been written with satellite distribution in mind. Within two years, more than two million cable subscribers were watching Channel 17 Atlanta from places that had never heard of the Atlanta Braves. The word "superstation" came from that gap. It wasn't a regulatory category, it was a description of what accidentally happened: a local station with a satellite uplink and enough cable carriage to function as a national network without any of the obligations that came with being one. Turner renamed it WTBS in 1979. Within a decade, the model had seeded ESPN, MTV, and The Weather Channel. All of them owed their distribution economics to the same principle: satellite is distance-agnostic, and if the rules don't say you can't, maybe you can. He bought the Atlanta Braves the same year he went national. That wasn't a vanity move. That was vertical integration. The team was programming the superstation needed that nobody else could simulcast. None of this required genius. It required someone willing to read a regulatory gap as an invitation rather than an oversight, and to move before anyone thought to close it. The broadcast engineers who built that uplink in 1976 were solving a straightforward RF problem. What Turner understood was that the business problem and the technical problem had the same solution, and that the FCC hadn't written any rules to stop him.

    6 min
  6. Why Broadcast Engineers Are Vanishing from Radio Stations

    May 4

    Why Broadcast Engineers Are Vanishing from Radio Stations

    Most of America's radio stations have lost their chief engineers, and nobody’s really noticing—until towers go dark or FCC fines pile up. When that one station sat silent for six months because no one knew the transmitter failed, it wasn’t an accident. It was a sign that the heart of local broadcast engineering is disappearing. Chief engineers used to keep the signal clean, the lights on, and the emergency systems wired. Now, they’re being replaced by remote monitoring and bean counters who don’t quite get how vital hands-on knowledge still is. Their departure isn't just a staffing issue; it affects safety, compliance, and the very reliability of local radio. We break down how industry changes—like telecom deregulation, consolidation, and low wages—have hollowed out the traditional engineering ranks. The numbers tell a story: membership in the Society of Broadcast Engineers is shrinking, the median age is climbing, and the incoming crowd is barely keeping pace with retirements. Meanwhile, tower thefts and outdated infrastructure threaten the remaining stations' survival. If local radio is going to stay on the air, the tech side needs a serious rethink. This isn’t just about fixing towers; it’s about safeguarding the infrastructure that keeps broadcasters accountable and connected. Listen closely—what’s lost in these quiet stations might be what’s lost in the public safety net altogether.

    15 min
  7. Why the FCC’s Public File Can Cost Your Radio Station Thousands

    Apr 27

    Why the FCC’s Public File Can Cost Your Radio Station Thousands

    Most stations are blind to how exposed they are the moment their FCC public file goes online. These aren’t just dusty binders anymore—every missed report, late political ad, or gaps in the issues list can cost tens of thousands in fines or threaten license renewal. If you’re not keeping a close eye on what’s in that digital folder, you’re playing with fire that you can’t see. The FCC moved the public inspection system online in 2018, turning what used to be a private, dusty collection into a searchable, date-stamped record anyone can scrutinize. That means political ads, ownership info, issues lists—if it’s late or incomplete, it’s on record, and it’s costly. The political file alone has sparked some of the biggest enforcement actions in radio history, with fines reaching into the hundreds of thousands for missing documentation or late uploads. Now, every quarter becomes a potential minefield. You’ll discover why most violations happen—forgetting to update the issues list, missing a quarterly report, or file late political ads. The rules haven’t changed much since the 80s, but the transparency has, making sloppy compliance a ticking time bomb that can blow up on license renewal day. Nobody’s exempt, not even the big groups, because every upload is timestamped and forever part of the public record. If you’re involved at any level—engineer, GM, or owner—it’s worth knowing what’s actually in that file and making sure it’s right. Because ignoring it now risks fines, license issues, or worse, a quiet investigation. The system’s tougher now, but it’s also clearer. Staying current isn’t just good practice—it’s survival. This episode is essential listening for anyone who thinks they’re flying under the radar. The rules are still the same, but the game’s changed. Know what’s in your FCC file before the next renewal hits, or risk the consequences.

    16 min
  8. The Cross-Platform File Transfer Tool Broadcast Engineers Actually Need

    Apr 16

    The Cross-Platform File Transfer Tool Broadcast Engineers Actually Need

    Moving a file three feet shouldn’t require a round trip to a distant server. We unpack a better way: LocalSend, a free, open source app that moves files, folders, and text directly over your own Wi‑Fi with end‑to‑end TLS and no accounts, ads, or tracking. If you live with mixed devices—Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and iOS—this is the rare tool that treats every platform like a first-class citizen and just works. We start with the everyday pain points: emailing yourself photos, juggling cloud links, and hitting platform walls when Airdrop meets Windows or Android. From there, we break down LocalSend’s simple but robust design: local discovery, a tiny HTTPS server on each device, and direct encrypted streams that run at LAN speed. You’ll hear how it compares to Airdrop and Quick Share, why stripping out relays and Bluetooth handshakes boosts reliability, and when the no-internet requirement is a feature—like on a travel router or hotspot with terrible hotel Wi‑Fi. Beyond basic transfers, we explore practical features that remove friction: sending entire folders, clipboard snippets, and large files with no artificial caps; favorites and auto‑accept for trusted devices; portable mode on Windows; and consistent UI across desktop and mobile. We also get candid about failure modes and fixes: mismatched SSIDs, AP isolation, strict firewalls, and VPNs that hijack local subnets. With a short checklist—same subnet, allow on private networks, open the right port, consider split tunneling—you can turn “devices don’t see each other” into instant, reliable sharing. If you’ve ever wished nearby sharing worked for every device in the room, this conversation is your blueprint. Learn how to keep your data local, move files at true LAN speeds, and skip the walled gardens without giving up ease of use. Enjoy the episode, then share it with the friend who still emails themselves attachments—and don’t forget to subscribe, leave a five‑star review, and tell us which device pair annoyed you the most before LocalSend fixed it.

    18 min
See All (27)

Ratings & Reviews

5
out of 5
3 Ratings

About

The Tyler Woodward Project is a weekly show about how technology, media, and radio infrastructure shape the world around us, told through the lens of a broadcast engineer who grew up with dial-up internet, FM and AM static, and the rise of the algorithm. Each episode unpacks the systems, signals, and corporate decisions behind how we communicate, listen, and connect, cutting through the marketing fluff and tech-industry spin. Expect sharp analysis, grounded storytelling, a touch of broadcast nostalgia, and clear explanations that make the technical human again.

Information