Sergio DeSoto The Counterintuitive Podcast

Sergio DeSoto
  • 0.0 (0)
  • Religion & Spirituality
  • Updated Weekly

This podcast delves into the lessons drawn from personal and professional journeys, examining human nature, counterintuitive thinking, and the principles of adaptability for a richer, more fulfilling life. With a deep exploration of biblical topics, it offers thoughtful insights for navigating the complexities of existence. substack.sergiodesoto.com

  1. 5d ago

    I Have Been Screaming the Wrong Word

    Rome mediated, and burned the men who handed out keys. Protestants gatekeep. For years I aimed the first charge at the second church, and I could not work out why it kept sliding off the people I most wanted it to land on. Say no mediation to a Protestant and he agrees with you. He doesn’t squirm — he quotes 1 Timothy 2:5 back at you before you finish the sentence, and he means it. His tradition was founded on saying it out loud against Rome. I was walking into rooms and prosecuting a count the jury had returned five hundred years earlier. A charge that costs the hearer nothing isn’t a charge. It’s a compliment he has learned to receive politely. So I went back to look at who Yeshua was hardest on — not corrected, not warned, but pronounced woe over. Read Matthew 23 and Luke 11 and notice who is standing there. It is not the priesthood. The kohanim ran the sacrificial system; they were the mediating class by definition. The scribes and Pharisees were the interpreters — the teaching class. And that is where the woes fall: you have taken away the key of knowledge (Luke 11:52); you shut the kingdom of heaven in people’s faces (Matthew 23:13). Not you inserted yourselves between men and atonement. You took the key. You shut the door. The episode works through: * A key is named for opening. Hebrew mafteach is built on patach, to open — the object named after the act. There is no Hebrew word for key meaning the thing that keeps you out. Greek splits the same root against itself: kleis in Luke, kleio, to shut, in Matthew. And the key was to gnosis — da’at underneath, the knowing of Hoshea 4:6 and the knowing Yirmeyahu 31:34 promised to everyone, least to greatest. They confiscated the key to the exact thing the covenant had just promised every child in the room. * Rome’s two crimes. It mediated, and it also gatekept — the loud way. The Vulgate in a Europe that didn’t speak Latin. Arundel’s Constitutions of 1408 making English Scripture a crime. Hus burned in 1415, Wycliffe’s bones dug up and burned in 1428, Tyndale strangled and burned at Vilvoorde in 1536 for wanting a ploughboy to know more Scripture than the prelates. A gate that obvious trains your eye for locks and flames — and leaves you unequipped to see the second gate, which has neither. * What the Reformation kept. Mediation went. Sola scriptura, the priesthood of all believers, the book in the vernacular. The custody did not go. Tyndale’s heirs inherited what he bought: the ploughboy has the book, in his own language, on his nightstand — and still waits until Sunday to be told what it means. * The sanctuary is the gate. The sign says sanctuary — mikdash, chartered in one sentence: let them make Me a sanctuary, that I may dwell in their midst (Shemot 25:8). Then look at what the room does with the middle. Chairs bolted one direction, a raised platform, one microphone among four hundred people, one name on the printed schedule — and the thing nobody wrote down: stand up mid-sermon and ask how did you get that out of the Hebrew, and it is not a question, it is an incident. The gate is not the opinion. It is the opinion plus the impossibility of testing it in the moment it is handed to you. * He could be interrupted. At twelve, in the temple, sitting among the teachers, listening to them and asking them questions (Luke 2:46). Both verbs. Four men tearing a hole in a roof over His head, and no rebuke for the interruption. Luke’s verb for Sha’ul in the synagogues is dialegomai — argument running both directions — nine times in Acts. And 1 Corinthians 14:29-31, where the man speaking is ordered to stop so a seated man can speak, and the congregation is given a job: let the others weigh what is said. Prophecy was on the floor when he commanded it. Kal v’chomer — if the room must weigh a prophet, how much more a man explaining a passage. * The narrow exception. Five marks of a teacher this doesn’t describe, including the two that decide it: he teaches you how to dig without handing you the conclusion, and you can stop him on the spot without it being a scandal. There is another key, and it is not in anybody’s pocket. He opens and no one shuts (Yeshayahu 22:22; Revelation 3:7-8). The actual key was never in the building, because it was never theirs to hold. You were never locked out. You were told to wait in the lobby, and you believed it, because a good man told you gently and every chair in the room was pointed at him. Shalom v’shalvah. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit substack.sergiodesoto.com/subscribe

    I Have Been Screaming the Wrong Word

  2. 5d ago

    The Heart Hires the Mind

    This one started with a book. Reading David Robson’s The Intelligence Trap — a study of how smart people end up believing foolish things — I kept seeing educated minds use their full horsepower to rationalize attachments they had already formed. Robson was not writing about romance. He was describing why people attend the systems of Western Christianity, and why pastors and churches curate them. Nobody reasons his way into love. The attachment arrives first, uninvited, and then the mind goes to work — cataloging virtues, explaining away warnings, building a case that sounds airtight to everyone except the friends watching from outside. The conclusion was never on trial. The heart decided, and then the heart hired the mind. The episode works through: * The word behind the word. Your English Bible splits you in two — heart feels, head thinks, and the cool head polices the hot heart. Hebrew refuses the split. The lev is where a man thinks, plans, and talks to himself. Which is why Yirmeyahu 17:9 lands harder than the English carries it: the lev is aqov — crooked, uneven, heel-grabbing ground, from the same root that named Ya’akov. The organ that reasons is the organ that deceives. And the next verse names the only examiner left: I, YHWH, search the lev. * Private logic. Adler’s term for reasoning built in service of a goal already chosen. Sha’ul filed the same finding without a laboratory — people “will accumulate teachers to suit their passions” (2 Timothy 4:3). Read the order of operations. Desire first. Teachers after. * The same engine, dressed in robes. Roman courtroom vocabulary entering through Tertullian’s Latin. Anselm proving the atonement remoto Christo and discovering, to the letter, the necessities of the feudal honor system outside his window. Calvin arguing like the lawyer he was trained to be at Orléans and Bourges. The brilliance is the tell, not the defense — coherence measures investment, not truth. And the tell inside the tell: a tradition that teaches the fall corrupted every human faculty, then exempts the faculty that built the system. * Where the two logics part. The lover eventually wakes up next to the actual person; reality keeps the breakfast appointment. An institution never has to. It writes conclusions into creeds before the questions arrive. The lover at least chose his beloved — yours was handed to you in the crib along with the finished arguments. And a person can surprise you back into the truth; a frame cannot speak. * What keeps you hooked. The lights come down, the band swells, the music climbs for twenty minutes, and the lev files the feeling as evidence. The feeling is real. The filing is the fraud. The first-century assembly sang — a psalm at a table, a hymn before walking out into the night (Matthew 26:30). What it did not have was the maintenance schedule. The Berean answer is not a colder heart. Luke praises the assembly at Berea for two things in one breath: they received the word with all eagerness, and they examined the Scriptures daily to see whether these things were so (Acts 17:11). Eagerness honestly owned, carried to the text and put under oath. The intellect is not fired; it is reassigned — no longer counsel for the defense, now a witness. And the audit Yirmeyahu warned about becomes something David asks for: Search me, El, and know my lev (Tehillim 139:23-24). One honest test closes the episode, and it is neither the quality of your defenses nor the depth of what you felt on Sunday: has the text ever overruled one of your loves? If your Bible has never cost you a conclusion you cherished, consider that you may not be reading it. You may be courting it, and it has been answering in your own voice. Shalom v’shalvah. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit substack.sergiodesoto.com/subscribe

    The Heart Hires the Mind

  3. 5d ago

    There Were No Jews at Nicea

    There were no Jews at the Council of Nicea. The men who walked with Yeshua were Jews. The men who ratified the empire’s Christianity were not. That absence is not a footnote to church history — it is the story. This episode walks the sequence in order: * 135 CE — Hadrian bans Jews from Jerusalem after the Bar Kokhba revolt. The city is rebuilt as Aelia Capitolina, and the unbroken line of fifteen Jerusalem bishops “of the circumcision,” running back to Ya’akov (James), ends. The next bishop is a gentile. * 325 CE — The same empire that severed the root convenes the council that defines the faith without it. Macarius of Jerusalem attends — a gentile holding the seat of Ya’akov in a city no Jew could lawfully enter. * The Notzrim — the Torah-keeping Jewish believers whose communities descended from the apostles’ own — could not sit at all, and within two generations were filed under heresy by Epiphanius for practicing what Ya’akov practiced. * The Pascha ruling — the resurrection festival is detached from the fourteenth of Nisan. Constantine’s own circulated letter gives the reason: so that Christians might have “nothing in common” with the Jews. The stated ground was not exegesis. It was distance. Along the way: the shape of Acts 15 against the shape of Nicea, and why a seating chart is a creed. The torn veil of Matthew 27 read against the covenant terms of Yirmeyahu 31 — Torah relocated, knowledge distributed, the mediating caste retired — and what it means that at Nicea the office came back enthroned, funded, and armed. The question of jurisdiction: the moedim are called mo’adei YHWH in Vayikra 23, fixed by His own word, and the only justification on record for moving one is an emperor’s motive standing where a text should be. And the counterintuitive turn at the center: this ugly history is evidence for Yeshua, not against him. Rome spent three centuries failing to kill the movement, then absorbed it. Execution, then co-option. Institutions do not mobilize against nothing. The episode closes where the essay closes — with Revelation 12:17 and the offspring the dragon makes war on: those who keep the commandments of God and hold the testimony of Yeshua. Both clauses, one people. Rome kept minutes. HaShem kept a remnant. For the wild branch tempted to feel superior, and for the reader halfway out the church door, there is a word here for both. Primary sources cited so you can check every date yourself: Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History 4.5–6 and 5.23–25; Eusebius, Life of Constantine 3.18–19; Socrates Scholasticus, Ecclesiastical History 1.9; Justin Martyr, First Apology31 and Dialogue with Trypho 11, 123, 135; Epiphanius, Panarion 29; Theodosian Code 16.1.2 and 16.2. Shalom v’shalvah. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit substack.sergiodesoto.com/subscribe

    There Were No Jews at Nicea

  4. Jul 8

    The Grave Was a Mikvah

    Ask what happened in the three days between the cross and the empty tomb and you get one of two answers: a holy pause, or a raid on hell. The Hebrew was built to say a third thing. In this episode I read the burial itself, from the third sentence God speaks in Genesis to the stone rolled away, and make the case that the grave was a mikvah. An immersion. You go down a servant and come up a King, down with a heart of stone and up with a heart of flesh. The water Yeshua rose through is the same water you were buried into. Bring your sharpest scholar and test it. Then go check the Hebrew yourself. https://www.sergiodesoto.com/posts/the-grave-was-a-mikvah This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit substack.sergiodesoto.com/subscribe

    The Grave Was a Mikvah

  5. Jul 8

    Communion: What It Really Is, and Why I Refrain

    I get invited to church often, and every time we do communion, I refrain. On purpose. This episode is why. Look hard at what we did with that cup. Yeshua put the new covenant in His own blood into the hands of His friends, and we turned it into a sacrament, administered on a schedule, from the front of a room, by a professional. But a covenant that is sealed cannot be re-sealed. There is nothing left to administer. The cup was never meant to found a priesthood. If anything, it dissolves the need for one. We took the very end of the priesthood and built a priesthood around it. Remembrance, zikaron, is a memorial among friends, not a re-sacrifice. Come test it with me, and then answer the only question that matters: are you going to be biblical, or not. https://www.sergiodesoto.com/posts/communion-what-it-really-is This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit substack.sergiodesoto.com/subscribe

    Communion: What It Really Is, and Why I Refrain

  6. Jul 8

    He Did It Himself

    Most of us were handed a courtroom: a holy God, a guilty defendant, a debt paid on a substitute so the books balance. Millions have loved Yeshua sincerely inside that frame. This episode questions the frame, not the love, because it is not the story the Hebrew Scriptures tell. Their story is a Garden, a rupture, and a long walk home. I follow one thread from Eden to Revelation and name the frameworks that buried it, Augustine, Anselm, Calvin, Darby, none of them in the text. And I say the thing that took me years to find words for: you cannot have the New Covenant of Jeremiah 31 unless God Himself comes down and takes the human side of it. Both. Because the covenant required both. https://www.sergiodesoto.com/posts/he-did-it-himself This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit substack.sergiodesoto.com/subscribe

    He Did It Himself

  7. Jun 20

    What the Spirit Does With the Letter

    Here is where every myth runs out of road, and where the real picture finally comes into view. A letter can be guarded. A letter can be abandoned. A letter can be mistaken for the voice already in your own chest. But a letter can also be written, the true letter, the Father’s own words, somewhere it can never again be lost. And that is what He intended all along. Listen to the promise in Yirmeyahu 31 once more, now that we know what it is not. A day is coming, He says, when He will put His Torah within us and write it on our hearts. The same lev He asked us to lay His words upon, He now promises to inscribe Himself. We could not carry Him there on our own, so He says He will do the carrying. The heart that could not be forced, He wins by writing on it. And He tells us how. In Yechezkel [Ezekiel] 36 He says, “I will put my Ruach [Spirit] within you, and cause you to walk in my chuqqim [statutes]” (Yechezkel [Ezekiel] 36:26-27). There is the hinge the whole letter has been moving toward. Understand what the Ruach is, because everything turns on it. The word means breath, wind, the moving air of life itself. It is the same Ruach that hovered over the waters in the beginning (B’reshit 1:2), the very breath HaShem breathed into the first man (B’reshit 2:7). So the Ruach HaKodesh, the Spirit of Holiness, is not some separate being standing apart from Him, and it is not your own conscience given a holier name. It is HaShem’s own breath, His own presence, set down inside you. The Ruach is not an alternative to the mitzvot, and not an alternative to Him. It is how He writes the mitzvot inward, how He turns a command you obey into a love you live, how He makes the reading become a knowing. And mark this, because it is the whole difference: it is not your own heart amplified. It is His heart, given. The Torah written by the Ruach on the lev is the Father Himself teaching you to want what He wants. Watch what that does to an ordinary commandment, because this is where it stops being abstract. Two people keep Shabbat. One is watching the clock and counting the prohibitions, measuring the permitted distance, anxious he has missed something. He is tending a fence. The other has been drawn by the Ruach into the Father’s own rest, and the day has become the weekly hour a son spends unhurried in his Father’s house. Same command. Two entirely different interiors. One is managing a rule. One is keeping an appointment with Someone he loves. Two people give tzedakah [righteous giving]. One writes the check to balance the ledger and feel the account is square. The other has had his very wants rebuilt, so that the Ruach has made him love the man he is helping, and the giving is no longer a tax on righteousness but the natural motion of a retrained heart. Same mitzvah. One is paying. One is loving. Two people come to the moadim [appointed times], the feasts Constantine’s church legislated away. One shows up because the calendar says to. The other meets the Bridegroom at the times He set for the meeting, and finds the feasts were never Israel’s homework but the Father’s own anniversaries, the dates He circled to be with His people. The same is true at the table, in the keeping of His ways with food, in every command you could name. Kept from the outside, it is compliance. Written on the inside by the Ruach, it is the native language of a son who has learned his Father’s house. This is not a new arrangement that cancels the old one. This is the Father keeping the Yirmeyahu promise. When the Ruach was poured out at Shavuot [the Feast of Weeks], the same feast where Israel received the Torah at Sinai, HaShem was not replacing the Torah. He was writing it where it could never again be guarded into silence, or set down as expired, or mistaken for a voice we generated ourselves. This is what Sha’ul means by the Torah of the Ruach (Romans 8:2), and by the fruit of the Ruach against which there is no law (Galatians 5:22-23). How could there be a law against it? It is the law itself, finally lived from the inside. the rest… https://www.sergiodesoto.com/posts/written-on-the-heart This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit substack.sergiodesoto.com/subscribe

    What the Spirit Does With the Letter

  8. Jun 7

    The Community You Cannot Build

    We engineer belonging the way a marketer designs a room, then call the feeling "community." But the Hebrew edah was never the building. You cannot build community; you can only become the kind of person it forms around. A study on the people that programs cannot manufacture. We have confused a production with a people. The modern church engineers belonging the way a marketer designs a room: tiered seating, lowered lights, a stage where the many watch the few, and it calls the feeling that machinery manufactures “community.” But when the program changes, the relationships dissolve, because they were never built on the people in the first place. In this study, Sergio draws on his own marketing background to take apart the machinery of manufactured belonging, then goes to the Hebrew to recover what was lost. The edah (עֵדָה), from the root meaning to be appointed and summoned, is not a crowd filling a space. It is a people gathered around a shared purpose, around the presence of God at the ohel moed, the tent of meeting. When the cloud lifted, Israel moved, and the edah stayed whole, because it was never the tent. From there: why program-based community hardens into rival branded camps instead of the one ekklesia; why Hebrews 10:25 commands covenant gathering, not organizational attendance; and why manufactured belonging is exactly the “commandment of men learned by rote” that Isaiah named and Yeshua confronted. The heart of it is simple and uncomfortable. You cannot build community. You can only become the kind of person community forms around. Aim at the fruit and you get a program. Tend the root, daily obedience, proven character, a life pointed at Abba and spent on people, and the fruit comes on its own. A word for anyone who has felt alone in a crowded sanctuary, or wondered whether walking away from the production means walking away from the body. It does not. Closes with three Selah questions, including the one that cuts cleanest: if your congregation closed its doors tomorrow and the schedule simply stopped, which of your relationships would still be standing six months later? This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit substack.sergiodesoto.com/subscribe

    The Community You Cannot Build
See All (110)

About

This podcast delves into the lessons drawn from personal and professional journeys, examining human nature, counterintuitive thinking, and the principles of adaptability for a richer, more fulfilling life. With a deep exploration of biblical topics, it offers thoughtful insights for navigating the complexities of existence. substack.sergiodesoto.com

Information