Lit Lessons on Flight School

NYT Bestselling Author, Jennifer Lauck

Internationally celebrated author with 25+ years of teaching experience who demystifies the creative writing game. Learn what you need to finish a memorable and publishable book in simple, easy to understand lessons. jenniferlauck.substack.com

  1. 6d ago

    Write Heroic. Be Heroic.

    Welcome into Flight School: It’s back-to-school at the Studio but also at the Conscious Writers Collective where I’m teaching Bones of Storytelling for Maya C. Popa and a lot of very bright, hungry and inquisitive minds. NOTE: Yes, you can join us. It’s never too late. More on that in a moment. One thing that bubbled up was a story I’m not proud of but that illustrated perfectly what ambition does to the best of people with the best of intentions: It was 2021, lockdowns, my daughter struggling, and I had a deadline. A book going out to publishers the next morning. And I chose the book over her, yelled and ranted rather than being there for someone I adore. I’ve never forgotten that moment. I never will. And that’s what ambition looks like at its worst — not the drive, not the hunger, not the desire for success, fame, money. Those are understandable. Human, even. It’s OVER DRIVE of ambition at its worst and the moment you realize what you traded for it. And that you can never get it back. The history: First book (Blackbird, 2000): Because I was with a man who needed me to show up financially and do my part. Second book (Still Waters, 2001): Because the publisher, editor and agent insisted it be done “NOW” for the sake of my career and sale and holding tight the wave of initial success. Plus, tack on a nonexistent happy ending, I was told. Readers LOVE happy endings. Third book: (Show Me the Way, 2003):Because after #2—which didn’t do well thanks to the release a month after 9-11, a fact I pointed out was a disaster-decision all it’s own but was ignored—I now had to “redeem myself,” as if the date of release was my call. Fourth book (Found, 2011): Because, as my numbers tanked—my agent, editor, and publisher were no longer interested in me—I threw this one together with a new publisher (a smaller one) in order just to have “something out there.” The last thing I published was an essay edited by Ann Hood and published in the Norton Anthology Knitting Yarns, 2013. (TY Hope Edelman for recommending me and Ann’s heroic editing skills). Then I stopped. Just stopped. Not writing. I’ve written my little fingers off and have a lot of wonderful writing piling around me, but I stopped with the ambition that was ruining me and a business that made so little real sense. My ambition reasserted itself in 2021 when I felt I had a pretty decent draft of a novel and, having secured another agent, was back in the whirlwind again. Cue the insanity. It’s easy for me to say that a writer needs to seek a balance for their writing life and ambitions. I’ve enjoyed astronomical successes that I can look back on and even call upon (would you even be reading this if I didn’t? Doubtful). And, how I wish I would have listened when I was told to put this all into perspective and seek balance first. What I mean is this: Balance in perspective. In ambition. In obligations. In energy. In happiness. In rest. What Balance Looks Like: A Habit of Being My favorite go to for this question is the letters of Flannery O’Connor which are in this amazing collection, The Habit of Being, edited by Sally Fitzgerald. O’Connor had lupus, forcing balance in her life. She gave about 2.5 hours a day. First thing in the morning. And that’s it. The rest of the time was filled with practice of her faith, peacocks, speaking, answering letters, being annoyed by and annoying her mother. It’s a wise and reasonable plan and I follow it to heal myself of my workaholic tendencies and the belief that “I have to get my book done.” 🤔 Your Turn: What about you? What does your balanced-ambition look like? Share your process, and your sanity, or your struggles. I’m listening. Thanks for being here, Jennifer 🐦‍⬛ PS: Yes. You can join me at CWC. We’re going until mid-December and there’s plenty of time for you to either drop in where we are and pick up, or even catch up. This is a class of fun, of deep thinking, and learning, and imagining. Check it out. And if you join, you are joining the PROSE collective as well as taking my class which is an amazing gift. Use BLACKBIRD in the coupon box for a $25 discount on your first month at CWC and enjoy. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jenniferlauck.substack.com/subscribe

  2. Sep 4

    Lost and Found

    Welcome into Flight School: What a treat to speak with Nina Schuyler, a woman lit up by a well-made sentence the way some people are lit up by music or by light on water. In a time when language has been reduced to a means to an end via the caption, the text, the email that sounds like a text, Nina’s teaching over at Stunning Sentences does something quietly radical. It asks writers to slow down and inhabit the sentence. To hear it. To feel it in the body. And, like her, fall in love with what words can do when you stop rushing them toward a destination. She’s in excellent company, too. Jane Smiley, in 13 Ways of Looking at the Novel, builds a pyramid of everything a novelist needs to know. At the base — the foundation — Smiley places punctuation, spelling, grammar which she calls “the most artificial layer, but also the most necessary to master” as an automatic function so internalized it gets out of the writer’s way. Above language, Smiley builds story and character, then setting and theme, then complexity, and finally, at the apex arrives at diction. My own pyramid here at the Blackbird Studio for Writers starts at the foundation: idea, concept, theme. Then the seven basic plots, the archetypal characters, structure, antagonistic forces, setting. At the top, I arrive at language, scene, and exposition. Intersection Points: Like Nina, I love the sentence. I do now and always have. When working with writers who stay with me for several years, I set the sentence aside at first because I believe a writer needs to know what they’re building before they can choose the right materials to build it with. My teaching then is where I build relationship and trust that will serve over the long haul. In the end, as you’ll see, Nina and I agree without question that writing is an embodied act, not an intellectual one. We both believe the sentence has to be felt before it can be fixed. And Nina loves to be lost in the writing — lost in the beauty and the aliveness of language itself, whereas I want to be found in the writing, want to know something I didn’t know, have some assumption interrogated and seen as untrue (or true). I want to gasp at the sentences, yes, but the meaning of them—cumulatively—is where I land in awe and humility. Both are acts of love. But our methods ask different things of the page, and of the person sitting down to fill it. I hope you enjoy this conversation for the place where two teachers find each other across the distance of their methods, and where we discover, underneath everything, how much we share. ✍️Your Turn: What's a sentence you've loved so long you've never forgotten it? I’ll see you in the comments and maybe Nina will grace our comments, too! Jennifer, 🐦‍⬛ This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jenniferlauck.substack.com/subscribe

  3. Aug 20

    What the Algonquin Taught Me About the Novel

    Welcome into Flight School: In this post, Maya C. Popa and I talk about the Foundations Intensive I’ll be teaching for her Conscious Writers Collective this September. First about Maya: She is a terrific lady. Whip-smart (as Tay Hohoff said about Harper Lee). Funny. Bursting with style, energy and purpose. And, last, no-nonsense about the art and craft of creative writing. Then comes her professional credits: The author of If You Love That Lady (W. W. Norton, 2026), Wound Is the Origin of Wonder, and American Faith. Her work is published in The New Yorker, Poetry, The Atlantic, The Paris Review, Granta, The Guardian, and elsewhere. And, she’s the Poetry Editor of Publishers Weekly, a teacher in the undergraduate and MFA in Paris programs at NYU. Maya and I found each other here on Substack, where I’ve been generally cheering on her honesty and hard work. One day, we got to talking about my foundations program and pretty soon, I was building a version for her remarkable Conscious Writers Collective. How could I not? In short, CWC is a new kind of institution built around the life of the writer rather than the duration of a degree — combining live programming, an ever-growing archive, and a global community of serious writers committed to the work. Bottomline: CWC overflows with talent and Maya’s integrity. In this interview, Maya asks some key questions about my journey as a writer and a teacher. I was delighted to answer. Where it all began: When Blackbird came out in 2000, my then-agent elbowed me to write fiction. I wasn’t ready. “But your career,” she said. “Think about your career.” So, I wrote an awful novel all about dreams. “The worst piece of drivel I’ve ever read,” the agent said had me fly to New York and meet a developmental editor at the Algonquin. Yes, that Algonquin. There I sat in that beautiful old lounge surrounded by the ghosts of some of the most interesting writers, and the editor talked about the rewrite using terms I’d never heard and didn’t understand. While I took copious notes, all I could think was, “No. I can’t do this. I don’t get a word of what she’s saying.” I wrote and published three more memoirs and eventually signed up for an MFA in hopes I’d finally learn everything I needed about fiction. When it was over, I learned how to rid myself of $50,000 but still knew nothing. Never give up: Post MFA, I started a story “think tank” with a group of talented fellows in various stages of their own projects. In a dank upper room of a freezing cold building—the very opposite of the Algonquin—we tore down novels and memoirs. And soon they brought in teaching texts on structure, antagonistic forces and plot. “Let’s talk about this,” they’d say. And we did. Those fellows included Lindsey Lee Johnson, Kate Hope Day, Ruth Warnier, Jody Little, and Becky Ellis. All published now. After about four years, the teachings formalized into the Bones of Storytelling which became the core of my own school, The Blackbird Studio for Writers, founded in 2015. What I’ve learned over the course of the journey is that the spirit of the Algonquin—that is, the collective thinking and gathering and talking—is what matters. And I’ve never stopped with that approach. Over these years, I’ve taught Bones at least two hundred times around the US and in Paris. I love Bones for one reason: It answers EVERY question I have about story. Finally. Take Foundations at CWC this Fall: September 12 through December 19, 2026 is a semester of learning on Saturday morning. 8 a.m. PST. CWC classes will be live on Zoom with lessons, handouts, slides, group discussions and work time. And again, I built the teaching specifically for CWC. This Bones will be unlike any version of this course I’ve taught before because Maya’s writers are unique: Poets who want to write fiction. Novelists on their second and third books. Writers who are serious about the long game. If you’re a CWC member, I’ll see you in September. If you’re not, think about becoming one. And use the above link adding in the the coupon BLACKBIRD for $25 off your first month’s plan. Alternatively, you can always take Bones with me on the regularly scheduled Studio program: Blackbird Studio Bones Class October 12 – December 14, 2026 Tuesday - 10:00 a.m. – noon PST Live on Zoom. Beginners to advanced. All welcome. No matter what, the first class of Bones is always free (below). Watch and see what happens when this teaching lands on your story. Thanks to Maya and thanks to everyone here on Flight School. I hope to see you in one of these terrific classes very soon, Jennifer 🐦‍⬛ This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jenniferlauck.substack.com/subscribe

  4. Aug 10

    The Summer of the Finch: The Question That Remains

    “We’re all like trees. If you cut us in half you can see exactly where our conscience began to form. But we’ve got all these rings.” ~ Patricia Boynton Welcome into Flight School and our last live conversation about these two amazing books. One we all know, one most of us cannot finish. Go Set the Watchman and To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee. What was Watchman about? In our live meet up, Patricia said it cleanly: Jean Louise built her house on what she thought she knew about Atticus — not on what was real, not on what she had tested and earned — and she was fully prepared to live there. She was prepared to build her little house on that rock, Patricia said. And so yeah, there would be tremors and there would be roof collapsing. When the tremors came Jean Louise pulled the ripcord. She was ready to destroy the most important relationship of her life based on a single week of new information, without grace, without debate, without allowing the full human being of her father to exist alongside her disillusionment. Uncle Jack stops her. Not because she’s wrong to be hurt. But because she is cutting herself off from the very information she needs to build something real. Pamela, who came to the book already knowing To Kill a Mockingbird by heart, said the hardest part was trying to unsee the Atticus she already loved, Gregory Peck, in order to read the first draft clearly. But when she could, she found something unexpected: hope. Not for Atticus. For Jean Louise. Because Jean Louise refuses to marry Henry Clinton — not for class reasons, not because Aunt Alexandra wins — but because he is not her kind. His values are not hers. And that refusal, Pamela said, is the first thing Jean Louise has decided entirely for herself. She did get values from Atticus, Pamela said. But she was able to form her own by refusing to marry Hank. That is the Rebirth. Tentative, painful, incomplete. But real. To Kill a Mockingbird’s craft revelation and what makes a book endure: * In Watchman we are told about Atticus’s goodness but in To Kill a Mockingbird we are shown. And that changes everything about how we understand our own writing. Lee, in her first draft didn’t do the work. But in the second (Mockingbird), she did and we will never get those images out of our mind. * To Kill a Mockingbird will be read a hundred years from now. So will A Tale of Two Cities. So will the Brontës. So will A Prayer for Owen Meany by John Irving. Why? Because they hold values that press against the flawed human self and ask it to go further. Most books on the bestseller list this year will be gone in one or two. Not because they aren’t well written but because they don’t press hard enough on the thing that doesn’t change. Atticus at the end of Mockingbird. Heroic? Or not? In one of the last scenes of To Kill a Mockingbird, Atticus is sitting in his living room, having a drink, while his children are being attacked on a road in the dark. He didn’t know. He couldn’t have known. But when it is over and he stands in that room, his magnificent code tells him his own son killed Bob Ewell. And the code says: turn him in. Heck Tate has to stop him and he does: I’m the law, Heck says. And I say Bob Ewell fell on his knife. And Atticus — shaken, humbled, defeated in the best possible way — accepts it. He lets the code bend in the hands of a plainer and wiser man. He comes back from the end of this book knowing something his magnificent mind could not have reasoned its way to. Patricia closed it with the image I want to leave you with: Harper Lee knew these people. She knew her conscience. She knew where it came from. She knew the bands around it. We’re all like trees. If you cut us in half you can see exactly where our conscience began to form. But we’ve got all these rings. Those rings are your story. 🤔 Your Turn Ten weeks later: who formed your conscience? And has anything shifted in how you understand it? Drop it in the comments. This conversation doesn’t have to end here. One more post coming that wraps up our Summer of the Finch. Thank you for being with me and I hope you enjoy the video replay, Jennifer 🐦‍⬛ PS: I’m delighted to be teaching a foundations program, the most updated of my Bones series for Maya Popa’s CWC program. Click the link below and get a $25.00 discount! This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jenniferlauck.substack.com/subscribe

  5. Jul 10

    The Summer of the Finch: A Conversation in Paris

    “You go to the very end, Jennifer. Which is why I wanted to be here.” — Pamela Combastet, Paris, 8 p.m. Welcome into Flight School and this deep conversation I was lucky to have with Pamela who is the President of WICE, a Paris literary program, a former New York magazine editor, and one smart lady. When we met in Paris, a few years back, she passed me the little book on conscience examination and I have it still. I’m not as rigorous about this examen as she is but the fact that she is a woman of deep conscience makes our conversation perfect. It was just Pamela and me in the room, too. Calling in from Paris at eight o’clock on a sweltering Monday night, Pamela was still thinking hard about Watchman, which she’d already read year ago but now listened to as a performance, in order to get through to the end. Together we did what good literature demands: We worked hard, we thought harder, and we let the questions go all the way down. It is a deep, therapeutic how do I live my life conversation. How do I bear the discomfort of the unbearable? This is what we found. On the book that changed you: Think about the one book you’ve read over the course of your life that moved something in you. What was the title? What did it ask of you? And looking back — does it still? Why? Or why not? These are the questions that literature, good literature, have been nudging out of human beings since pen was put to papyrus. Not answers. Questions. The kind that live in you for decades and keep changing shape. Pamela and I, in this conversation, used our time to push those questions about Go Set a Watchman. It is raw, unfinished, exposed, and yet inside live gems that cannot be gathered without going the full distance and finishing it. Who was your Atticus? Pamela has been turning this question over since she registered for this series. She can’t land on a single person. What she named instead was a moment. Robert Kennedy. Campaigning in the South. Stopping at a sharecropper’s farm. Asking a group of children if they’d had lunch. The children, aware of the camera, said yes. And she watched his face — the blank moment when he knew they were lying. When he understood they hadn’t eaten. When the crusade stopped being political and became personal. That, she said, is when he became sincere. She has never forgotten that quiet moment. Years later it still lives in her — the standard for what authentic engagement with another person’s reality actually looks like. That is not a borrowed conscience. That is a formed one, built from a single witnessed moment of genuine recognition. I took that and turned it around for anyone watching, because the question works both ways. Jean Louise projected a kind of perfection onto Atticus — his view became her view, his certainty became hers, and she didn’t have to think too hard because she could always go to him. That is the borrowed conscience. But the reverse is also true: we have all been someone else’s Atticus at some point. We have all been the person someone projected their ideal onto, and then disillusioned, and then condemned. When I was writing Blackbird and evidence showed me a different father than the one I’d believed in, I went from idealization straight to villain. Just like Jean Louise. It takes time to find the full human being in the middle. Jean Louise has less than a week. That’s what makes the book so uncomfortable to read. That teeter-tottering, with no processing time, compressed into seven days. The question Jean Louise, and all of us, are being asked: I put it to Pamela directly: what do you think the end of this conversation is? When you are standing in a room with someone whose position you find monstrous, whose words eliminate the humanity of entire groups of people — what do you do? Pamela: You accept them. Not superficially — not ‘I’ll pray for you’ which often just means go to hell. But a real acceptance. I can’t understand you but I agree to be in this difficult uncomfortable middle space. Where hopefully something will illuminate between us. A way forward. And that is exactly what Uncle Jack is pointing Jean Louise toward. Not agreement. Not forgiveness. Not pretending the horrible man at the Citizens’ Council meeting didn’t say what he said. But the recognition that she has a gift. Jean Louise doesn’t see color, she never has, because of how Atticus raised her and entrusted his children to Calpurnia and stood in a courtroom for Tom Robinson. Uncle Jack offers that Jean Louise’s gift needs to come back to Maycomb as a voice, not a judge. On serving wittily: We landed, near the end, on a quote from A Man for All Seasons. Thomas More, on the brink of being beheaded by Henry VIII, speaks to his daughter: God made the angels to show him splendor, he made animals for innocence, plants for their simplicity. But he made man to serve him wittily, in the tangle of his mind. That is what this book is asking of us. Not to resolve the tangle. To serve wittily inside it which means to use the mind that was given to us, connected to the heart, connected to the soul, and asking the hardest questions without looking away from the answers. (24.25) “You walk through Paris. I walk through Portland,” I said. “We see the suffering. We ask what we can do.” “We surrender. We accept,” she said. A note on faith: Yes, this conversation steps into the terrain of God and we make no apology for that. We are not talking about religion or pushing a particular belief system. We are talking about the greater consciousness of the human heart and soul. Land where you can. Let it move you toward the biggest questions you can ask. Three questions: * Who formed your conscience? * If that was shattered by disillusionment, how long would you need to process it? (I’ve personally needed forty years after my father disillusioned me.) * And — can you arrive on the other side changed enough to withstand someone you detest, in order to add your own voice to the conversation That last one is what Uncle Jack is asking of Jean Louise. It is what this book, never meant to be read, is asking of us. Coming July 21st: Post Three of this series drops about the editorial miracle performed by Harper Lee on Go Set a Watchman. The miracle that produced one of American’s foundation literary masterpieces. Watch for that. AND, you are reading To Kill a Mockingbird. Same town. Twenty years earlier. Through a child’s eyes that see everything clearly, precisely because she doesn’t yet know what she’s supposed to look past. If you want to catch up, here’s your map: Post 1: Summer of the Finch. The Beginning Post 2: Summer of the Finch: Zoom Launch Post 3: Go Set a Watchman: Post 🤔 Your Turn What is the one book that changed you? And what did it ask of you that you are still answering? Drop your answer in the comments. I’m listening. Thanks to Pamela for thinking so hard with me and thanks to all of you for being with me on this journey, Jennifer, 🐦‍⬛ This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jenniferlauck.substack.com/subscribe

  6. Jun 28

    The Summer of the Finch: Launched

    Welcome into Flight School for our Summer of the Finch: We had a full house of writers signed up for this meeting and then, come Go Time, we only had two and then one and then two again. That’s summer for you so I’m delighted to bring you this follow up conversation from our launch. I opened with an exercise. Close your eyes. Imagine your unfinished manuscript — the one that isn’t ready, the one in the drawer, the one you know needs more work. Now imagine you drop dead. And someone publishes it anyway. Jennifer from Oklahoma put it perfectly: It would be like someone just pushing you out of a plane. That is exactly what happened to Harper Lee. Her first draft, raw, unrevised, the book she locked away and said would never see the light of day, was published fifty-five years later while she was deaf, nearly blind, and living in an assisted care facility. Her protector, her older sister Alice, had died months before. Holding that context in your hands changes everything about how you read Go Set a Watchman. It is not just a difficult book. It is an exposed one. And as writers we feel that in our bones. Who Formed Your Conscience? That’s the question to hold. Not who taught you manners. Not who gave you rules. Who had a moral certainty so complete that you absorbed it as your own — a parent, a priest, a teacher, a tradition, a belief system — and trusted it so fully that you never had to build one yourself? And NOW the harder question: What happened, or what would happen, if that person or institution turned out to be wrong? Not wrong about something small. Wrong about something that sits at the very center of what you both believed. Jean Louise Finch built her entire moral life on Atticus. His certainty became hers. She called it her conscience when it was really his. And then she comes home to Maycomb and the floor drops. That is not a story about race politics in 1950s Alabama, though that context matters enormously and we’ll sit with it. It is a story about any person — any writer — who has been living inside someone else’s certainties and suddenly has to find out what they actually believe. Patricia (New Mexico): She walked into Go Set a Watchman already knowing To Kill a Mockingbird by heart. And so she couldn’t help but see, the whole time she was reading the first draft, what was going to be lifted and transformed into the masterpiece. Jean Louise becoming Scout. The difficult, annoying, self-righteous adult becoming the child every reader fell in love with. The transformation, she said, is just amazing. That observation is the heart of where we’re headed. Lee didn’t abandon her first draft. She went back inside it and found the real story hiding in the margins. Her editor Tay Hohoff, a Quaker, a serious reader, pointed at the flashbacks, the childhood memories, the child’s clear eyes looking up at her father, and said: go there. Write that story. Two and a half years of revision later, To Kill a Mockingbird emerged. One of the most perfectly constructed novels in the American canon. Built from the bones of the book everyone says is unreadable. Nothing was wasted. Jennifer (Oklahoma): This is a writer who gets the Harper Lee Award of the day. She finished Watchman nine minutes before our Zoom. And her honest response? I didn’t think it was bad. I liked it. I went along with it. That is the right response for a newer writer, and a genuinely important craft observation. When you haven’t yet spent years learning what makes a novel great, you don’t feel the weight of the telling, the exposition, the pages of interiority that exhaust the experienced reader. You just ride it. The audio helps too. When a book is being read to you, the telling washes over you the way a song on the radio does. If you are listening, that’s great, but to capture the feeling I’m pointing to, that drag in this book, go back and read that first chapter on the page to feel how inside Jean Louise’s head we are rather than in a room with other people. That is the craft lesson. And it is exactly what Hohoff saw and why she sent Lee back to revise. The Full Teaching: Lit Lesson 57 This lives on my Blackbird Studio site, where the advanced writers in the thirty week program go. You’re invited in now, too. This post lays the groundwork for our Summer of the Finch. If you are just joining the challenge: Start Here with that teaching. Then go read Go Set a Watchman if you haven’t. And if you have started and stalled —> keep going. The gold is at the end. I promise. Summer of the Finch Schedule: 6/27/26: Live Zoom Meeting 1: The Live Launch/Conscience (post 6/28) ✔️ 6/29/26: Post Two Drops on our Deep Watchman Teaching (PAID ONLY) 7/7/26: Live Zoom Meeting 2: Debrief Watchman & Assign Mockingbird 7/14/26: Reaction Posts Drops: Our conversation from 7/7/26 + on editing and what Harper Lee took from Watchman and dropped into Mockingbird Bonus: How this impacts you and your writing 7/21/26: While you’re reading Mockingbird in Review Post Drops (PAID ONLY) 7/25/26: Live Zoom Meeting 3: Debriefing your read of Mockingbird 8/3/26: Post Drops: Our edited 7/25/26 conversation + Mockingbird and Plot (PAID ONLY) 8/8/26: Live Zoom Meeting 4: Wrapping the Finch teachings 8/17/26: Final Post Drops: Our 8/8 edited conversation and last thoughts 🤔 Your Turn Who formed your conscience? A parent, a teacher, a tradition, a belief system — whose moral certainty became yours before you ever had to build your own? Drop it in the comments. This is where the real conversation starts. I’m looking forward to this terrific series. And your insights on a story about a Finch who touches the thorns and lives to sing about it, Jennifer 🐦‍⬛ This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jenniferlauck.substack.com/subscribe

  7. Jun 5

    The Romp Knows Something You Don't

    Welcome to Flight School: When Heide Island emailed asking for a blurb on her new book Romp, I almost said no. I’d worked with her briefly, years ago, when I was just starting to build what would eventually become The Blackbird Studio and this fabulous tributary: Blackbird’s Flight School. She was a science writer. I wasn’t sure what I had to offer. But she was insistent. So I read the book. And I wrote her a blurb: Heide Island brings a Jane Goodall-like patience and wonder to the world of otters, observing with both scientific rigor and deep reverence. Romp! is an intelligent study that never loses sight of its heart, written in prose that’s as playful and engaging as its subjects. This is a book that will make you feel both smarter about the natural world and grateful to inhabit it ~ Jennifer Lauck Romp! (Tarcher/Penguin) is the kind of book that sneaks up on you. It’s about otters, yes — all fourteen global species, anchored in one family on Whidbey Island. But it’s really about community. About how nothing survives alone. About how the same thing that’s true in a Pacific Northwest estuary is true at a writing desk. Heide is now a published author with a second book already in proposal. She teaches at Pacific University. And she got here, not through luck (though there’s a great Cinderella moment in this conversation) but through years of showing up, building a platform, learning to take critique without flinching, and finally, finally, asking for help. I wanted her on Flight School because her story is your story. Or it can be. Enjoy this conversation. Time Stamps: * [3:00] What it means to muscle it alone * [17:00] The Cinderella publishing story —> and why she resists it * [20:30] Critique vs. criticism: the rolling out of bed analogy * [26:30] Crisis in Higher Education 🤔 Your turn: * Heide talks about the difference between criticism and critique. One is a judgment about you. The other is someone pulling the toilet paper off your shoe before you walk out the door. This is one of the best framings I’ve heard for what we do in this community. How are you with feedback? Does it hurt? Can you take it? What have you learned about the two and the difference? * Where are you still muscling it alone? Is it the writing itself? The submission process. The belief that you need to figure it out by yourself? See you in the comments, Jennifer 🐦‍⬛ Cover image: Marc Webber/UFSWS This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jenniferlauck.substack.com/subscribe

  8. Mar 23

    The Egoic Trap Running Your Hero's Life

    Welcome into Flight School: Week 1: What your hero fights for (and which level your story actually reaches)Week 2: Which plot you’re actually writing (not the one you wish you were)Week 3: The egoic trap you can’t see yet (but your writing will reveal) Over these three classes we had fifty people sign up. WOW. Unheard of. And yet, as you’ll see from the classes themselves, only four to six showed up in person each week. And those who did show up did a great job thinking together. In this last meeting, we had a great conversation that was raw and personal. I shared fresh material from a tiny book called Born Only Once by Conrad Baars, a Dutch psychiatrist who survived Buchenwald. I hope you get a lot out of this group with two novelists and two memoirists who covered the full terrain of story. The question that drove this entire class: What is the egoic trap your hero is caught in? And what will it take to set them free? The Setup: Marilyn Monroe and Hitler Marilyn Monroe: abandoned by her mother, raised in a house of horrors by mentally ill caregivers, never knew her father, beaten with religion. She had spunk, determination, a strong will. But she was the tragedy of the unaffirmed person attempting self-affirmation. Walking around saying “I’m okay, I’m okay” when she had never been shown her basic goodness. Adolf Hitler: raised by an authoritarian father (one shot, that’s it) and an indulgent mother (no limits, no boundaries). Average intelligence, failed entrance exams, years of poverty and unemployment. Emotionally deprived at the key formative years. Also had a strong will. Same foundational wound. Different manifestations. Both destroyed themselves in the end. The six egoic traps Konrad pulled from the text: * Amassing material possessions * Becoming a millionaire many times over * Success in studies, oppressive array of degrees and titles * Reaching the top of the ladder * Attaining fame (or associating with famous people) * Gaining power over others through authority, dictatorship, gangsterdom * Promiscuous behavior (there were actually seven) These are the compensations for feeling worthless, lonely, inferior. And after class, Konrad sent me this terrific chart: The Counter-Example: Pope John XXIII Considered unattractive by the standards of the world, yet anyone who met him walked away feeling their own goodness. Why? He was affirmed. And he carried these qualities: * Sensitive (not discouraged sensitivity, but awareness of what’s happening in every moment) * Open to the goodness of life * Calm, unhurried way of life * Unselfish and humble (the humility to be wrong, to say “I’m wrong and I’m okay with that”) * Moral self-restraint (meeting people where they’re at, not expecting them to be beyond that) I gave my daughter these qualities on a 3x5 card when she was struggling: Be yourself. Stop repressing emotions. Don’t hang on your fears. Be assertive. Don’t put people down to make yourself important. The Example That Landed: Cast Away Tom Hanks. Go-go-rush guy. Time is his God. Gets stranded on a desert island. Talks to a volleyball for years. Wants to take his own life because he can’t control anything (same egoic trap as Marilyn and Hitler: Control). But nature affirms him. Survival tests him. He comes back a quiet man. At the end, he’s at a crossroads. Literally. And it’s enough. He doesn’t need all the answers. He’s been freed from the egoic trap. Then We Worked on Real Stories * David (tragedy): “My hero longs for power. Gets it. Blows it. Betrays himself and everything else. Which prompts the rise of an antagonist who becomes the hero in the second book to defeat him.” Clear when it’s tragic. * Konrad (novel): “My midwife wants to write the first book about midwifery by a woman. Her husband says women don’t write books. So she becomes unaffirmed by her husband and pushes her daughter to become a doctor instead.” I gave him the Jung quote: “Children are driven unconsciously to fulfill everything that was left unfulfilled in the life of their parents.” Konrad: “I never thought of it that way till this piece. Crazy.” * Chrissy (memoir): “I’m befuddled.” Me: “It’s almost impossible when it’s about yourself. The lines will show you. Don’t worry.” * Sarah (memoir about adoption): “My trap was a desire to appear fine. Everything is fine. We were a successful adoptive family. We were fine. We were NOT fine.” * My own trap (from Blackbird): Blind loyalty to the point of self-sacrifice. So loyal to my mother and father that I created truly dangerous circumstances for myself. Why? Years later in therapy I discovered my father tortured me with cold showers if I didn’t take good care of my mother. I was three and four years old. That loyalty was a three-year-old’s interpretation, not a grown woman’s understanding. The Revelation A woman told me yesterday on a podcast: “I read your book so many times and it gives me courage to recontextualize my own experience. I felt like I was the only one.” My heart soared. Because that’s the job. We bring forth the human experience. Truth. Goodness. Or in David’s case, a cautionary tale about abject awfulness—but written in such a human way we go, “I know that guy.” Remember, this is a long-game art form: Your book could last fifty years. A hundred. I just celebrated the twenty-fifth anniversary and nothing is more powerful than knowing I wrote something that asked the tough questions and pushed beyond what was comfortable in my era. All handouts and teaching materials below. We Have Room in the Live Bones of Storytelling When: Wednesday March 25 at 5 to 7 p.m. These three classes are a taste. Bones is the full meal deal. A direction-changing class that will inspire you to go the distance. If you’re a subscriber, you get 20% off. Check the footer of your last email. Handouts: ✍️Your Turn: What is the egoic trap YOUR hero is caught in? Don’t panic if you can’t answer yet. The writing will show you. It showed me ten years after I wrote Blackbird. It showed Patricia in this very class. It might show you on page 200 of your draft. But start asking the question now. Watch for it. The lines will reveal it. Drop your thoughts in the comments. Thanks for three weeks of this work. You showed up. You engaged. You’re on your way. Jennifer 🐦‍⬛ This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit jenniferlauck.substack.com/subscribe

About

Internationally celebrated author with 25+ years of teaching experience who demystifies the creative writing game. Learn what you need to finish a memorable and publishable book in simple, easy to understand lessons. jenniferlauck.substack.com