Weighed in the Balance

Jonathan Brooks & Co
  • 0.0 (0)
  • CHRISTIANITY

Weighed in the Balance, the show where we weigh claims against scripture and see if they hold up, of if they fall flat. 

  1. Are You Studying the Bible for Truth… or Just to Be Right?

    4D AGO

    Are You Studying the Bible for Truth… or Just to Be Right?

    Send us Fan Mail Are we studying Scripture to discover what’s true—or just to defend what we already believe? In this episode of Weighed in the Balance, we break down a key issue behind so many theological debates: confirmation bias. Using a real exchange on Bible translations, we look at what happens when someone prioritizes their conclusions over the evidence. We cover: Why “uniformity” in manuscripts is a mythWhether modern translations actually remove doctrineHow presuppositions shape interpretationWhat it really means to seek truth in theologyThis one gets a bit more intense than usual—but the question matters. 👇 Jump into the comments: Do you think most people study to learn—or to defend their position? 👍 Like & subscribe if you enjoy thoughtful, charitable theological discussion. 00:00 Introduction to the Podcast and Its Goals 01:11 The Purpose of Studying Scripture 06:12 Exploring Different Theological Perspectives 07:01 The Importance of Challenging Biases 08:31 Debate Analysis: The Blood of Christ 17:06 Uniformity vs. Preservation in Translations 22:35 Misrepresentation in Theological Arguments 27:04 Conclusion: Seeking Truth vs. Defending Biases Support the show Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!  Click here to find us everywhere!!

    28 min
  2. Do Modern Bibles Remove “the Blood”? | KJV Onlyism Answered

    APR 28

    Do Modern Bibles Remove “the Blood”? | KJV Onlyism Answered

    Send us Fan Mail Do modern Bible translations actually remove references to the blood of Christ? And what about people who struggle to understand the KJV—don’t we want people to actually read and understand the Bible for themselves? In this episode, we look at two major audience questions from the KJV Onlyism debate: Should Christians be expected to read a Bible they cannot understand?Are modern translations removing key doctrines by omitting phrases like “through His blood” in Colossians 1:14?The goal is not just to possess a Bible—but to know God through His Word. If you enjoy careful, charitable theological discussion, consider subscribing and joining the conversation. 00:00 Introduction to Biblical Study 02:03 Understanding Scripture and Its Importance 06:43 The Role of the Holy Spirit in Understanding 17:00 Textual Variants and Their Implications 32:08 The Debate on King James Version vs. Modern Translations Support the show Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!  Click here to find us everywhere!!

    40 min
  3. KJV Onlyism, Origen, and Manuscripts: Let’s Think Clearly

    APR 21

    KJV Onlyism, Origen, and Manuscripts: Let’s Think Clearly

    Send us Fan Mail In this episode of Weighed in the Balance, we continue working through audience questions from the Cravat–Canupp debate, focusing on King James Onlyism and textual criticism. Can anything good come from Egypt? Should manuscripts be dismissed based on their origin? Did Origen corrupt the text of Scripture? And what exactly is textual criticism anyway? We take a careful and charitable look at these questions, distinguishing between lower and higher criticism, addressing common misconceptions, and emphasizing why these issues matter for how we understand the Bible today. My goal is not to attack, but to think clearly and faithfully about Scripture, history, and the tools God has given us to understand His Word. If you enjoy thoughtful theological discussion, consider liking the video and subscribing. 📌 Let me know your thoughts in the comments: – Should Egyptian manuscripts be dismissed? – How do you understand textual criticism? – Do translation differences affect doctrine? 00:00 Introduction to the Debate and Audience Questions 01:55 Critique of King James-Onlyism 07:36 Understanding Origen and Textual Criticism 14:23 Lower vs Higher Criticism in Textual Studies 24:54 Philosophy and Its Role in Theology 29:11 Examining Scriptural Citations and Errors Support the show Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!  Click here to find us everywhere!!

    40 min
  4. Is Sola Scriptura Logically Inconsistent? (A Clear Answer in Response to Sean Hiller)

    APR 14

    Is Sola Scriptura Logically Inconsistent? (A Clear Answer in Response to Sean Hiller)

    Send us Fan Mail In this episode of Weighed in the Balance, we examine a common Roman Catholic objection: that sola scriptura is logically inconsistent. But is that actually true? Before responding to that claim, we lay out the positive case for sola scriptura, grounded in the Westminster Confession of Faith, and present a clear syllogistic argument:  God alone is the final authority  We access that authority through His Word  God’s Word was given orally and in Scripture  Oral revelation has ceased  Therefore, Scripture is now the only access point to God’s final authority From there, we evaluate whether objections to sola scriptura actually demonstrate a logical contradiction, or whether they simply challenge the truth of the premises. We also interact with a video by Sean Hiller and examine several common misunderstandings of the doctrine. 00:00 Introduction to Sola Scriptura 01:18 The Positive Case for Sola Scriptura 05:02 Understanding Final Authority 07:57 Logical Consistency of Sola Scriptura 12:42 Addressing Objections to Sola Scriptura 17:48 The Role of Secondary Authorities 21:50 The Importance of Church Authority 25:11 Examining Mr. Hiller's Arguments 30:11 Clarifying Misunderstandings 34:11 Conclusion and Invitation for Discussion Support the show Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!  Click here to find us everywhere!!

    53 min
  5. KJV Onlyism Debate Wrap-Up: Psalm 12, Calvinism, and Audience Questions

    APR 7

    KJV Onlyism Debate Wrap-Up: Psalm 12, Calvinism, and Audience Questions

    Send us Fan Mail Welcome back to Weighed in the Balance, where we examine whether claims can hold up to scrutiny. In today’s episode, we wrap up the debate between Mitch Canupp and Nathan Cravatt—but the most interesting part is just beginning: the audience questions. We cover:  Nathan Cravatt’s final speech and whether it actually addressed the debate question  The credibility issue and historical claims about James I of England Whether the debate truly engaged textual criticism  A deep dive into Psalm 12 and the Hebrew grammar behind a major KJV-only argument  Why masculine vs. feminine forms matter for interpretation  A problematic answer involving the Holocaust and why it fails theologically  How Scripture speaks about God’s preservation of His people  The difference between the canon of Scripture and textual transmission We also reflect on a broader principle:  Even long-held beliefs should be examined carefully and honestly in light of truth. If you enjoy careful, charitable theological analysis, consider liking the video and subscribing—it really helps more people discover these discussions. Support the show Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!  Click here to find us everywhere!!

    58 min
  6. He Got King James COMPLETELY Backwards…

    MAR 31

    He Got King James COMPLETELY Backwards…

    Send us Fan Mail In this episode, we continue analyzing the 2021 debate on King James Onlyism—and take a closer look at a historical claim that simply doesn’t hold up. Was James I of England a Presbyterian but not a Calvinist? Did he reject the Geneva Bible because of Calvinist theology? The historical record tells a very different story. Drawing from the Hampton Court Conference and the contemporary account by William Barlow, we examine what King James actually said—and why he objected to the Geneva Bible’s marginal notes. This episode is a reminder of two crucial skills:  Verify historical claims  Follow the logic of arguments carefully If you do those two things, you’ll avoid most bad arguments—especially on topics like Bible translation. 📌 Topics Covered:  King James and Presbyterianism  The Geneva Bible controversy  The real reason behind the King James Version  Calvinism vs. church polity  Evaluating historical claims responsibly Support the show Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!  Click here to find us everywhere!!

    40 min
  7. The Fatal Flaw in King James Onlyism (It Doesn’t Hold Up)

    MAR 24

    The Fatal Flaw in King James Onlyism (It Doesn’t Hold Up)

    Send us Fan Mail Weighed in the Balance helps Christians evaluate arguments and discern truth. In an age of well-produced, eloquently spoken, and highly persuasive claims, this channel asks a simple question: Is this true? In this episode, we continue analyzing the debate between Nathan Cravatt and Mitch Canupp, focusing on a critical question: Which manuscript tradition is most trustworthy? But as the discussion unfolds, a deeper issue emerges: inconsistency. Can the arguments for King James Onlyism be applied universally? Or do they collapse under their own weight? We explore:  Lower vs. higher criticism  Internal vs. external evidence  The “law of first mention”  The claim that “Egypt = bad”  Why inconsistency may undermine the entire position Ultimately, this episode isn’t just about Bible translations—it’s about learning how to evaluate arguments carefully and honestly. 👍 Like, comment, and subscribe for more thoughtful theological analysis. Support the show Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!  Click here to find us everywhere!!

    49 min
  8. KJV-Onlyism Falls Apart Here (1 John 5:7 & Revelation 16:5 Explained)

    MAR 17

    KJV-Onlyism Falls Apart Here (1 John 5:7 & Revelation 16:5 Explained)

    Send us Fan Mail In this episode, we continue analyzing the 2021 debate on KJV-onlyism and examine two key passages—1 John 5:7 and Revelation 16:5—that raise serious challenges for the position. While the King James Version remains a faithful and valuable translation, elevating it to the only acceptable English Bible creates major apologetic, theological, and interpretive problems. We also address common misconceptions about the New King James Version and its textual basis. Quick clarification: While there are a few minor differences between the KJV and NKJV (such as “God” vs “Lord” in some places), these remain within the Textus Receptus tradition and do not indicate a shift to the Majority or Critical Text. If you enjoy careful, charitable theological discussion, consider subscribing and joining the conversation in the comments. Support the show Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!  Click here to find us everywhere!!

    50 min
See All (62)

About

Weighed in the Balance, the show where we weigh claims against scripture and see if they hold up, of if they fall flat. 

Information

  • Creator
    Jonathan Brooks & Co
  • Years Active
    2025 - 2026
  • Episodes
    62
  • Rating
    Clean
  • Copyright
    © 2026 Weighed in the Balance
  • Show Website
    Weighed in the Balance

You Might Also Like