Weighed in the Balance

Jonathan Brooks & Co

Weighed in the Balance, the show where we weigh claims against scripture and see if they hold up, of if they fall flat. 

  1. Can Protestants Disagree and Still Be Christian?

    3d ago

    Can Protestants Disagree and Still Be Christian?

    Send us Fan Mail Can Christians disagree on doctrine and still recognize one another as genuine believers? In this episode of Weighed in the Balance, we examine arguments against Protestantism that claim doctrinal disagreement inevitably leads to chaos, relativism, or endless division. We discuss the difference between primary, secondary, and tertiary doctrines, why Protestants reject false teaching without demanding absolute uniformity on every issue, and whether Sola Scriptura actually provides a meaningful basis for theological certainty. Topics include:  Protestantism and doctrinal disagreement  Sola Scriptura  Heresy vs theological error  Baptismal regeneration  Roman Catholic critiques of Protestantism  Essential vs non-essential doctrines  The clarity of Scripture  Church authority and tradition If you enjoy careful, charitable theological discussion, please consider liking the video and subscribing to the channel. 00:00 Introduction to Theological Discussions 00:51 Focus on Roman Catholicism 02:14 Addressing the Commenter's Concerns 05:19 The Clarity of Scripture 10:07 Baptism and Salvation 15:27 Membership and Doctrine in the Church 19:41 Understanding Different Interpretations 26:33 Distinguishing Between Doctrinal Issues 31:10 Navigating Disagreement in Faith 33:37 Understanding Sola Scriptura and Its Implications 37:08 The Role of Authority in Teaching 41:37 The Challenge of Competing Perspectives 46:28 The Church's Authority and Its Interpretation 50:57 Closing Thoughts on Respectful Dialogue Support the show Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!  Click here to find us everywhere!!

    55 min
  2. The REAL Problem with King James Onlyism

    May 19

    The REAL Problem with King James Onlyism

    Send us Fan Mail In this episode of Weighed in the Balance, we continue examining audience questions from the 2021 debate between Mitch Canupp and Nathan Cravatt on the King James Only controversy. This section of the debate reveals some of the deepest theological differences between the two sides. We discuss: Textual variants and how textual criticism actually worksTranslation differences vs. manuscript differencesTitus 2:13 and the Granville Sharp construction1 Peter 3:18 and translation philosophyWhether Christ can truly be preached from modern translationsActs 12:4 (“Easter” vs. “Passover”)Claims that chapter and verse numbers contain inspired revelationThe purpose of Scripture according to the Reformed traditionWhy the gospel itself must remain central in our doctrine of ScriptureMy goal in this series is not mockery or outrage, but careful and charitable theological analysis. Even where disagreements are sharp, Christians should strive to represent opposing positions accurately and fairly. If you enjoy careful theological discussion, please like the video, subscribe to the channel, and consider sharing the episode. 00:00 Introduction to the Debate 02:10 Understanding Textual Variants 06:07 Translational Differences Explained 15:32 The Role of Scripture in Salvation 31:10 Interpreting Prophecy and Scripture 50:18 The Purpose of Scripture 58:14 Conclusion and Reflection Support the show Do you think this claim is found wanting? Let us know on social!!  Click here to find us everywhere!!

    59 min

About

Weighed in the Balance, the show where we weigh claims against scripture and see if they hold up, of if they fall flat. 

You Might Also Like