Climate Economics with Arvid Viaene

Arvid Viaene

A research-focused podcast on the economics of climate change and air pollution. Episodes are released every two weeks on Tuesday at 6 am CET.  Episodes will be either expert interviews or solo explorations of key issues. Hosted by Dr. Arvid Viaene, a climate economist with a PhD from the University of Chicago. He has done research on the impacts of climate change on agriculture and mortality. His research on climate-related mortality has been published in The Quarterly Journal of Economics, and he has advised the European Commission on the impacts of climate policy on firm competitiveness.

  1. #14 Dr. Matilde Bombardini - U.S. Climate Politics

    12/16/2025

    #14 Dr. Matilde Bombardini - U.S. Climate Politics

    We talk a lot about the “right” climate policies—carbon pricing, clean investment, regulation. But there’s a step before all of that: politics. Who wins elections. What voters actually do—not just what they say in surveys. And how politicians reposition when the climate gets hotter and the economy starts to transition. Today’s episode asks three concrete questions: When a place experiences unusually extreme heat, does it measurably shift votes?Do local green and brown jobs shape climate politics in predictable ways?And crucially: when voters move, do politicians follow… or do they sometimes move the other way?My guest is Professor Matilde Bombardini, and we’re discussing her working paper “Climate Politics in the United States.” What makes this research stand out is the data: precinct-level election results—so we can compare neighborhoods within the same congressional district—and detailed measures of candidates’ environmental policy positions.  You’ll hear the headline results, how to interpret the magnitudes, and what their framework implies for the future probability of something like a carbon-pricing bill passing in the U.S.  Matilde Bombardini holds the Oliver E. and Dolores W. Williamson Chair in the Economics of Organizations and is Professor of Business and Public Policy at UC Berkeley Haas, affiliated with NBER, the BFI’s IOG group, CEPR, and CESifo.  For questions, comments or suggestions, you can contact me at arvid.viaene.ce@gmail.com

    37 min
  2. #11 Dr. Jos Delbeke - The History of the EU ETS: Key Turning Points, Challenges and Policy Lessons

    10/25/2025

    #11 Dr. Jos Delbeke - The History of the EU ETS: Key Turning Points, Challenges and Policy Lessons

    On paper, climate policy sounds simple: you put a price on carbon. Either you tax it, or you cap it and let firms trade. In practice, doing that for one of the world’s biggest economies — as the first mover — is anything but simple. This episode looks at 20 years of the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): how it started, the challenges, the lessons, and where it’s going next. The ETS is the world’s first major carbon market, and it has helped drive CO₂ emissions in covered sectors down by more than 50% since 2005.  My guest is Professor Jos Delbeke. Jos is the former Director-General for Climate Action at the European Commission and one of the key architects of the EU ETS. He now holds the EIB Chair on Climate Policy and International Carbon Markets and served as the Commission’s lead climate negotiator in the run-up to the Paris Agreement.  We cover: • Why the EU chose cap-and-trade over a carbon tax — and why that wasn’t just an economic choice, but a political one. Taxation in the EU requires unanimity, and that was never going to happen, while industry was more open to a trading system than to a tax.  • Phase 1 as a “pilot”: building the monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) system so anyone could actually trust the emissions data. That early data work is what let the system mature.  • The early overallocation problem and the first carbon price crash — and why that was a necessary wake-up call.  • Windfall profits in the power sector, the political fight over free allocation, and why auctioning allowances to power producers became the rule. That shift also created revenue streams for things like the Innovation Fund and Modernisation Fund.  • The 2008–09 crisis, the flood of international credits, and the massive oversupply that pushed prices down. We talk through how the Commission responded by tightening access to external credits and designing the Market Stability Reserve (MSR) to effectively “put surplus allowances in the fridge.” Prices moved from ~€5–6 to €25–30 in a matter of months once that reform landed.  • How repeated reforms gradually “Europeanised” the ETS: from nationally driven allocation and fragmented rules to a more harmonised, EU-wide carbon market with common auctioning rules and a single registry.  • The psychology of carbon pricing: once CEOs realised pollution had a cost, they started planning around a carbon price — sometimes even using internal shadow prices of €50–100/ton to guide long-lived investment decisions.  • The next 20 years: ETS2, decarbonising heavy industry instead of just shutting it down, CBAM (the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, due to enter into force in 2026), and whether the MSR is ready for a world of higher prices, tighter caps, and more volatile geopolitics.  If you want to understand how real climate policy gets made — not on a whiteboard, but in actual law, markets, and boardrooms — this is the episode. If you have any advice on how to improve the podcast or advice on future guests or episodes or ideas, please let me know. I’d love to hear from you. For questions, comments or suggestions, you can contact me at arvid.viaene.ce@gmail.com

    41 min
  3. 10/21/2025

    #10 - Best of Air Pollution Episodes - Impact, China's War on Pollution and India's innovative cap-and-trade approach - ft. Dr. Hasenkopf, Dr. Debb and Dr. Trimarchi

    Air pollution isn’t just a climate co-benefit—it’s the number one threat to human health. In this best-of compilation, we revisit three standout conversations to trace the arc from global impacts to two of the world’s most important case studies: China and India. Both tackled air pollution, but one  In this episode: The global picture (Dr. Christa Hasenkopf, EPIC – UChicago): Why fine particulate matter (PM2.5) quietly shaves ~2 years off global life expectancy—and how microscopic particles damage organs far beyond the lungs. China’s “war on pollution” (Dr. Christa Hasenkopf & Prof. Lorenzo Trimarchi): From “beyond index” days in Beijing to a ~40% drop in pollution in ~10 years, powered by political will, strict enforcement, and transparent monitoring—plus how the US–China trade war unexpectedly loosened local environmental regulation. India’s market innovation (Dr. Kaushik Deb): Inside Gujarat’s groundbreaking particulate-matter cap-and-trade pilot: near-100% compliance vs. ~64% under command-and-control, 20–30% lower emissions, and 11–12% lower compliance costs—with expansion underway to SO₂, industrial effluents, and new state programs. Why it matters: China shows what rapid national action can achieve; India shows how markets + measurement deliver cleaner air at lower cost—an approach now scaling across states and sectors.  Guests: Dr. Christa Hasenkopf • Dr. Kaushik Deb(b) • Dr. Lorenzo Trimarchi. Keywords: air pollution, PM2.5, life expectancy, China, India, cap-and-trade, environmental regulation, EPIC, J-PAL, SO₂, public health, climate co-benefits.  For questions, comments or suggestions, you can contact me at arvid.viaene.ce@gmail.com

    22 min
  4. 10/07/2025

    #9 - Marian Krüger - Carbon Capture: Technologies, Competitiveness, and the Importance of Demand-side Policy

    Marion Kruger, co-founder of Remove, explains how carbon removal technologies are essential for achieving net zero targets by compensating for emissions that are impossible or extremely expensive to eliminate. Carbon removal is what puts the "net" in net zero, and by 2050, we'll need to remove 5-10 gigatons of CO2 annually—creating an industry comparable in size to today's oil and gas sector. • Three main types of carbon removal technologies: nature-based, hybrid, and engineered solutions • Nature-based solutions like afforestation cost around $50/ton but face durability challenges • Hybrid solutions like biochar offer middle-ground approaches at roughly $150/ton • Engineered solutions like direct air capture provide the most permanent storage but currently cost $1000+/ton • The "like-for-like principle" matches emission types with appropriate removal technologies • Market development requires policy support, particularly integration into compliance systems like the EU ETS • Geographic flexibility is needed to deploy removal solutions where they're most cost-effective • Carbon removal startups face a "valley of death" in financing that threatens industry development • Public procurement programs and early innovation funding are critical to bridge the gap until markets mature • Carbon removal complements rather than replaces emissions reduction efforts For questions, comments or suggestions, you can contact me at arvid.viaene.ce@gmail.com

    47 min
  5. 09/23/2025

    #8 - Dr Lorenzo Trimarchi - How the 2018 U.S.– China Trade War Increased Air Pollution and CO2 Emissions in China

    Did the 2018 US–China trade war make China’s air dirtier and increase its CO2 emissions? This question is not easy ex-ante. On the one hand you have a decrease in production which decreases emissions and pollution. On the other hand, there is more pressure on politicians to relax environmental standards. Notice any similarities with recent events?   In my latest episode, I therefore sit down with Prof. Lorenzo Trimarchi to unpack these forces in his new JDE paper, “The Unintended Consequences of Trade Protection on the Environment.” We dig into how a large tariff shock can relax local environmental regulation, and why that raised pollution without delivering big economic gains.  Episode link: Topics with time-stamps: * A puzzling observation: Pollution went up after the Trade War [1:28]  * 3 Measures of Environmental Stringency [6:33] * Chinese Political Economy and Politician's Promotion Criteria [11:50] * Trade-offs Between Growth and Environment [19:46] * Younger politicians Were More Likely to Relax Environmental Standards [20:30] * Weak Effects of Environmental Regulation on Economic Performance [24:30] * The US-China Trade War Explained [28:30] * The Story of the Targeted Retaliatory Tariffs from China [36:40] * Chinese Policy Experimentation & A Positive Take-away [38:40 * Implications for EU Carbon Border Tax & Uniform Tariffs [41:30] * Future Research on Climate Politics [46:08] Highlights: * Local political leaders in China are promoted in a “tournament” style format using KPI’s, similar to a company.  * U.S. tariffs shifted weights of these KPI's back towards GDP over clean air in light of the trade war. * Key stats from the 2018–2019 trade wars: tariffs of 10–25% on about $200B of exports; by Sept 2019 ~48% of Chinese exports affected to about roughly 6% of China’s GDP. These numbers are massive. I did not realize the 2018 tariffs were that large.  * Why younger politicians more strongly relaxed environmental standards  * Easing rules increased emissions (PM2.5/CO₂) but didn’t materially change the economic output. This has implications for the EU’s carbon border policy and for using tariffs to deliver environmental goals. Naturally, extrapolation to current developments is out-of-sample. But similarities abound! For more information on the research discussed, see "The Unintended Consequences of Trade Protection on the Environment" in the Journal of Development Economics. For questions, comments or suggestions, you can contact me at arvid.viaene.ce@gmail.com

    50 min

About

A research-focused podcast on the economics of climate change and air pollution. Episodes are released every two weeks on Tuesday at 6 am CET.  Episodes will be either expert interviews or solo explorations of key issues. Hosted by Dr. Arvid Viaene, a climate economist with a PhD from the University of Chicago. He has done research on the impacts of climate change on agriculture and mortality. His research on climate-related mortality has been published in The Quarterly Journal of Economics, and he has advised the European Commission on the impacts of climate policy on firm competitiveness.

You Might Also Like