Changemakers’ Handbook with Elena Bondareva

Elena Bondareva

Your front-row seat to PhD findings into change-making and no-holds-barred insight into my experience across 6 continents. Join me in fueling dialogue on the why, the how, the how not to, and the personal toll of creating regenerative transformation. changemakershandbook.substack.com

  1. 21h ago

    Art is water for changemaking

    I may have been bullying artists recently. Or, perhaps, I have been excessively compelling changemakers who are capable of making art to do so. Either way, a poet, a satirist, a couple of painters, and an occasional dancer have been subjected to fervent appeals that their therapists may eventually hear about. Please make art. Please do not underestimate what it does the world. The longer I study changemaking, the more convinced I become that art is one of civilization’s oldest changemaking technologies — and one whose powers we have persistently underestimated. Changemaking demands strategy, competency, meticulous process, and masterful execution. These reshape the conditions around people: institutions, incentives, relationships, resources, and systems. They matter enormously. However, meaningful change also expects something of the people moving through it. It asks us to loosen identities, certainties, loyalties, fears, griefs, and hopes. It asks us to become capable of inhabiting a future that does not yet exist. This journey cannot be engineered. It must be imagined and experienced. And that is where art comes in. A private place to meet ourselves Art changes the conditions within people, but not by issuing instructions, winning arguments, or demanding agreement. When societies know who they are, art celebrates. When societies know what they are fighting, art mobilizes. But when people can no longer make sense of themselves —when decent people are unsure whether to take pride or shame in their private thoughts — art becomes something else entirely. It becomes a kind place for an unmasked meeting with ourselves. Public life has become remarkably poor at holding such encounters. It demands conclusions before we have woven an understanding. It rewards declarations and treats uncertainty as weakness, guilt, or evasion. Art asks something quieter of us. It asks us to stay. To remain by an unfolding idea. With an authentic moment. Inside a paradox. Despite the urge to run. A poem, a song, a dance, a painting, a novel, or a satirical sketch may quietly ask: Is this what you want? Is this who you want to be? The gift of art is that no one ever has to hear our answers. The artist creates the work, but the decisive conversation occurs in private between the work and the person encountering it. Away from applause and outrage, we can notice what frightens, attracts, disgusts, consoles, implicates, or awakens us. We can mourn what we cannot explain. We can reconcile envy, tenderness, prejudice, delight, resentment, hope, and love within the human heart. Art gives us permission to confront ourselves before confronting one another. This privilege is one of art’s greatest kindnesses. Practicing paradox In my last essay, I argued that one of the defining competencies of changemakers is the capacity to remain inside paradox: to resist resolving complexity too quickly and to tolerate uncertainty long enough for better judgment to emerge. LINK: https://changemakershandbook.substack.com/p/can-changemaking-be-taught Art is one of the places where we practice that competency. It can suspend judgment without abolishing discernment. It can loosen shame without excusing harm. It can delay action without surrendering responsibility. This suspension matters because action taken too quickly may be little more than fear dressed as moral courage. Art does not tell us what to think or who to become. It challenges us to question, imagine, and remain present long enough to encounter truths that cannot be marketed, legislated, or argued into existence. Art gives wisdom room to form. Refusing collective self-deception For the artist, creation can be an act of defiance: pointing to what everyone else pretends not to see. The declaration that the emperor has no clothes is not reserved for governments. Art exposes the delusions of markets, institutions, ideologies, movements, communities, and individuals. It reveals where certainty has become performance, where language has outrun humanity, and where the stories we tell have locked us out of possibility. It invites us to consider where we, too, might disappoint ourselves. This is why authoritarian movements have so often feared artists. Not every artist is politically radical, but art itself resists reduction. It refuses to collapse a human being into a caricature, demographic, diagnosis, voting bloc, algorithm, market segment, or enemy. Art insists that human experience is always larger than the systems attempting to explain or control it. Long before investigative journalism, peer review, decentralized governance, or social media, artists were helping civilizations fulfil one of their most important responsibilities: refusing collective self-deception. Artists have risked ridicule, censorship, exile, imprisonment, and obscurity to insist on questions capable of disturbing complacency. Art allows the artist to remain truthful. It allows the rest of us to discover whether we are. Changemaking changes the changemaker Yes, this is a mouthful. It also feels increasingly important to me. Planning matters. Action matters. Power matters. Connection matters. But for any of these to be exercised wisely, changemakers must attend to transformation within people, including within themselves. Art helps us notice where conviction has calcified into identity, where fear has disguised itself as certainty, where shame has hardened into cruelty, and where hope remains alive beneath the rubble. It reminds us that the people affected by change are not merely components of a system and that changemakers, too, are frightened, contradictory, grieving, and sometimes giddy with excitement. Art softens what argument often hardens. Without it, changemaking risks becoming technocratic. People become obstacles to move, audiences to persuade, populations to manage, behaviours to modify, or instruments of somebody else’s vision. Art tethers transformation to our humanity. Art is water Perhaps this is why I keep returning to water as a metaphor. Water does not command a seed to grow. It changes the condition of the ground to make growth possible. It softens what has hardened, carries nourishment, restores what drought has made brittle, and awakens life that appeared to be gone but was merely dormant. Similarly, art breaks through the baked-on residue of ignorance and injury. It rehydrates our capacity for imagination. It welcomes contradiction without spectacle. It restores compassion and delight, because human beings cannot live indefinitely on urgency, duty, and outrage. Water also offers hospitality. To hand someone a glass of water is to honor them. Art offers a respite to parts of us that public life rarely welcomes. It enables humility without humiliation. It allows for trust. Art does not force transformation. It creates conditions in which transformation can live. If you are an artist, please do not mistake your work for decoration, indulgence, or retreat. You are wielding one of humanity’s oldest transformational technologies. You create places where we can look ourselves in the eye. You give truth a place to hatch and imagination — somewhere to soar. You expose the invisible and restore life to what grief, fear, and certainty have made brittle. Please write, paint, compose, carve, print, dance, perform, and fashion matter into meaning. Please make visible what the rest of us have stopped noticing. Please keep reminding us that no movement is worth building if it requires us to abandon our humanity. I would love to know how art has changed what you see, feel, imagine, or do. Please share! * * * Changemakers’ Handbook is an audience-supported publication focused on professionalizing chaangemaking in a post-solutions world. Consider subscribing to invest in this work, join future live conversations and to access all posts. Image credit: Alexandr Ivanov from Pixabay. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit changemakershandbook.substack.com/subscribe

  2. Jul 23

    Can changemaking be taught?

    Approximately 70% of transformational efforts fail. We often blame strategy, leadership, culture, funding, politics, or bad luck. Increasingly, my research suggests another explanation: we have never treated changemaking as a profession. Architects, teachers, engineers, surgeons, firefighters, pilots, and musicians all develop explicit competencies. We expect them to practise, improve, receive feedback, and continue learning throughout their careers. Changemakers, by contrast, are largely expected to figure it out as they go. That has left generations of extraordinary people underprepared, unsupported, and far more dependent on talent and perseverance than any serious profession should tolerate. One of the central questions driving my PhD is deceptively simple: if changemaking is a profession, what are its competencies? This post offers an early answer. If you listened to my Q2 Field Notes (LINK: https://changemakershandbook.substack.com/p/field-notes-on-changemaking-q2-2026?r=1i4aw7), you'll recognize this as one of the biggest shifts in my thinking. Increasingly, I suspect that successful transformation depends not only on good methods but on the abilities of changemakers. If that's true, understanding the competencies they can develop becomes just as important as understanding the tools they use. While my recent writing has focused on the predispositions that may draw someone toward changemaking, today's post turns to a different question: once someone is drawn to this work, what can they deliberately learn to become most effective? Changemakers have largely learned through improvisation. We apprentice ourselves to problems, borrow techniques from adjacent professions, accumulate scars, and hope that experience eventually resembles expertise. No mature profession would deem that sufficient. If we can articulate the competencies of changemaking, we can begin to do what every mature profession eventually learns to do: * recruit people whose natural predispositions fit the work, * develop them intentionally rather than accidentally, * coach them through increasingly complex challenges, * recognize excellence, * and sustain meaningful impact over an entire career. My research suggests 9 core and 6 situational competencies. While most of the competencies below emerge from my own research and practice, they are also informed by the work of others who have shaped my thinking. In particular, futurist Bob Johansen's work on future leadership skills has influenced several of the situational competencies, including dilemma flipping, bio-engaging, human calming, and what he calls "smart-mob swarming." His work has been an important companion as I develop a competency framework specifically for changemakers. LINK TO BIO: www.iftf.org/people/bob-johansen/ LINK TO BOOK: https://www.iftf.org/insights/navigating-the-age-of-chaos-a-sense-making-guide-to-a-bani-world-that-doesnt-make-sense/ The 9 Core Competencies of Changemakers These are the competencies all effective changemakers demonstrate. Some emerge naturally. Others require years of deliberate practice. Together, they form the professional foundation of changemaking. * Curiosity — Embracing uncertainty; actively seeking and enjoying new perspectives and experiences. * Systems Thinking — Building on the predisposition of systems sensitivity, this competency involves analysing interdependence, feedback loops, leverage points, and unintended consequences in order to design more effective interventions. Detailed in my earlier post: https://changemakershandbook.substack.com/p/want-to-change-the-world-master-systems?r=1i4aw7 * Empathy — Understanding and responding to the lived experience of others when designing and leading change. * Strategy — Stripped of rigidity, effectively coordinating action across all spheres of influence. Related to Bob Johansen's concept of "clarity." * Facilitation & Collaboration — With humility and vulnerability, guiding groups toward possibility that is unlocked through cooperation. * Intentionality — Translating conviction into deliberate action. * Influence — Enlisting others, whether through charisma, story, or orchestration. Closely related to Bob Johansen's "smart-mob swarming." * Impact Assessment — Defining and communicating success; indispensable for legitimacy and scale. Detailed in my earlier post: https://changemakershandbook.substack.com/p/are-you-impactful-how-you-can-know?r=1i4aw7 * Sense of Purpose — Knowing your “why”; the compass and stamina behind changemaking. Detailed in my earlier series: https://changemakershandbook.substack.com/p/playlist-purpose-is-fuel-for-changemaking?r=1i4aw7 Situational Competencies While not universal, these competencies can give changemakers the edge to navigate crises, build resilience, and turn intractable problems into breakthroughs. Think of them as the extra gear. You can ride without it, but if the journey challenges you, you’ll be glad it’s there. 1. Self-Awareness Knowing yourself: your motivations, blind spots, and triggers. This isn’t indulgence — it’s essential for trust, clarity, and the power of conviction. Leaders at peace with both their ego and trauma — who know how they come across — are better able to mobilize others. 2. Self-Care & Resilience Effective changemakers burn bright, and that takes stamina. In some, it may mean cultivating stoicism: staying grounded under pressure. For others, it means implementing habits that allow for renewal. Either way, resilience is non-negotiable for a lifetime of impact. Human Calming -- “Developing a sense of centeredness that cultivates inner focus, maintains composure under pressure, and guides others with steady grounded presence in a brittle, anxious, nonlinear, and incomprehensive world.” — Bob Johansen 3. Decisiveness Consensus has its place. But when the moment demands action, indecision can sink a movement. Decisiveness is the courage to make the hard call when it matters most. 4. Dilemma Flipping (after Bob Johansen) The toughest problems present as unsolvable paradoxes — until someone reframes them into opportunities. It’s a skill of foresight, timing, judgment, and creativity: resisting premature conclusions while avoiding endless delay. 5. Bio-Engaging (after Bob Johansen) Nature holds wisdom, and biomimicry has rightfully been pushing its way into mainstream decision-making. Changemakers who draw on ecological principles — interdependence, resilience, regeneration — design solutions better suited for today’s crises. 6. Gameful Mindset Play is not frivolous. It’s an adaptive, experimental, and engaging approach to solving problems. Changemakers who approach transformation with a playful mindset — testing, iterating, inviting collaboration — create momentum and possibility. Why the distinction matters Core competencies are universal. Without them, transformation doesn’t stand a chance. Situational competencies are amplifiers. They mark the difference between good and great practice. Core skills let you survive the terrain of change. Situational skills let you thrive in its steepest climbs. They don’t replace the core ones. They extend them. Cultivating changemaker competencies For more than twenty years and across six continents, I have been helping leaders, executive teams, coalitions, and mission-driven organizations build these competencies — long before I had language for the framework emerging through my PhD. I increasingly see my work as professional development for changemakers. Sometimes that means coaching individual changemakers or executive teams through an especially complex or ambitious transformation. Sometimes it involves diagnosing why transformational efforts stall or derail. I often develop transformational strategy, build collaborative processes, recalibrate systems, or help groups develop the confidence and judgment required to lead meaningful change together. If your organization is navigating significant change — or if you're a leader who wants to become a more capable changemaker — I offer executive coaching, team development, facilitation, and strategic advisory grounded in this work. Contact: Elena@vivitworldwide.com The bigger picture My work in defining changemaking isn’t about narrowing the field to an elite few. It’s about professionalizing the craft so that we can recruit, equip, and sustain more changemakers for the long haul. Competencies are not the whole story. My research increasingly suggests that changemakers also share certain recurring predispositions—ways of seeing and relating to the world that make some people more likely to step toward transformation in the first place. LINK: https://changemakershandbook.substack.com/p/how-to-spot-a-change-maker-signs?r=1i4aw7 Predispositions may influence who becomes a changemaker. Competencies shape how effective they become. That distinction has become one of the central questions of my research — and, increasingly, the reason this publication exists. _ _ _ Changemakers’ Handbook is an audience-supported publication focused on professionalizing chaangemaking in a post-solutions world. Consider subscribing to invest in this work, join future live conversations and to access all posts. Cover image credit: Pexels from Pixabay This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit changemakershandbook.substack.com/subscribe

  3. Jul 5

    Field Notes on Changemaking (Q2 2026)

    In this second installment of Field Notes on Changemaking, I again step back after a quarter of essays and conversations to reflect, synthesize, and help build shared memory for an emerging profession. These field notes serve two purposes. First, they provide an overview of the content generated during the quarter, helping you decide what source material is most worth your time. Second, they offer my reflection across that material to identify emerging patterns, refine working hypotheses, pose the next set of questions, and invite you to shape the coming quarter of inquiry. One unexpected gift of writing these notes is that they force me to examine not only what I published, but how my own thinking has changed. What has changed in how I understand changemaking? LINK to Notes from Q1: https://changemakershandbook.substack.com/p/field-notes-on-changemaking-q1-2026?r=1i4aw7 Q1 ended with eight questions that I believed would shape the next phase of my work. They remain the living research agenda behind The Changemaker’s Handbook, my doctoral research, and the conversations within this growing global community. * What builds legitimacy at scale? * Can we create transformation without social movements? * How does power actually move? * How do we design for impact—not merely moral correctness or agreement? * Why do changemakers continue to serve, against all odds? * What would it mean to professionalize changemaking without flattening it? * How do we build the infrastructure this emerging profession lacks? * And how do we reduce the unequal cost of change? Q2 certainly advanced some of those questions. More surprisingly, it reorganized them. Regardless of whether I was speaking with Dr. Laura Mae Lindo about public service, Dr. Whitney Austin Gray about public health, Andrew MacLeod about trafficking and institutional courage, Dr. Dominique Hes about regenerative design and story, or reflecting on gender, mothering, fathering, and invisible work, I found myself pulled further upstream. Questions about legitimacy became questions about trust, standards, and story. Questions about social movements became questions about adoption. Questions about power became questions about relationships, institutions, and narrative. Even my longstanding interest in transformation infrastructure began to feel incomplete. Infrastructure, I realized, is itself dependent on something more fundamental: the conditions under which it can emerge, be maintained, and ultimately become ordinary. Rather than asking how we create change, these conversations probed what makes change possible. If we better understand the conditions that allow transformation to spark, spread, and endure, perhaps legitimacy, adoption, professionalization, and even power become more intelligible as consequences rather than starting points. That, I now believe, was the central discovery of the quarter. Q1 questions were pointing toward a more fundamental one. The quarter in review The quarter opened with a milestone in my doctoral research into changemaking: three essays that captured some of my findings. What are changemakers for? Are all people changemakers? and How can we recognize one — or know that we’re “it”? introduce the function changemakers serve in society, the six attributes they appear to share, and why the world benefits from a diversity of contribution — not merely a diversity of people. LINK: https://changemakershandbook.substack.com/p/how-to-spot-a-change-maker-signs?r=1i4aw7 LINK: https://changemakershandbook.substack.com/p/most-people-are-not-changemakers?r=1i4aw7 LINK: https://changemakershandbook.substack.com/p/what-are-changemakers-for?r=1i4aw7 I also revisited the origin story of my own work. Rather than recounting a biography, Why I Care explores why I have spent two decades trying to professionalize changemaking, and what experiences convinced me that the world needed better transformation infrastructure. LINK: https://changemakershandbook.substack.com/p/why-i-care-10e?r=1i4aw7 For Mothers’ Day and Fathers’ Day, I stepped outside my usual territory to explore two forms of contribution that get trapped in biology and gender. To All Who Choose to Mother the World argued that mothering is best understood as a choice: caring for what is vulnerable. LINK: https://changemakershandbook.substack.com/p/to-all-who-choose-to-mother-the-world?r=1i4aw7 What Are Fathers For? drew on my global audience and 50+ answers to what fathering had contributed to your lives. Your responses suggested that fathering may be less a category of person than a category of care: helping people trust themselves, understand the world, and participate in it with integrity. LINK: https://changemakershandbook.substack.com/p/what-are-fathers-for?r=1i4aw7 The LIVE conversations extended those themes in unexpected directions. Dr. Laura Mae Lindo challenged the way we educate changemakers for public service, arguing that we devote disproportionate attention to methods over the formation of the practitioner. If changemakers themselves are one of the variables shaping outcomes, that imbalance matters. LINK: https://changemakershandbook.substack.com/p/we-are-teaching-changemakers-wrong?r=1i4aw7 Dr. Whitney Austin Gray showed how public health increasingly succeeds not by persuading people to make better choices, but by making healthier conditions inevitable. Standards, buildings, and environments become forms of invisible changemaking when they make flourishing easier than harm. LINK: https://changemakershandbook.substack.com/p/on-making-change-stick-interview?r=1i4aw7 Drawing on decades of international humanitarian work, Andrew MacLeod took us into some of society’s most difficult territory: human trafficking, gender-based violence, untenable social norms, and institutional failure. My subsequent reflection explored a question that stayed with me long after the recording ended: what happens when a problem is not merely difficult, but socially and psychologically avoided? LINK: https://changemakershandbook.substack.com/p/post-live-reflection-what-happens?r=1i4aw7 LINK: https://changemakershandbook.substack.com/p/changemaking-on-unspeakable-territory?r=1i4aw7 Finally, Dr. Dominique Hes brought many of the quarter’s themes together. We discussed regenerative design, story as infrastructure, representing Nature on fiduciary boards, and why she increasingly believes our greatest challenges are no longer technical, but narrative. LINK: https://changemakershandbook.substack.com/p/beyond-solutions-our-story-problem?r=1i4aw7 This conversation changed something in my own thinking. I now see story not primarily as communication but increasingly as infrastructure. 6 working hypothesis Here are the arguments occupying me after this exceptional quarter of learning: 1. The world is not short on solutions; it is short on transformation infrastructure This has been a recurring argument in my work for several years, but the conversations this quarter have refined what I mean by it. Again and again, I encountered fields rife with technical knowledge: we know how to build healthier buildings, reduce suffering, and restore ecosystems. We know a great deal about learning, leadership, and human flourishing. Yet the existence of good ideas remains a remarkably poor predictor of their adoption. The bottleneck, increasingly, appears to lie elsewhere. Transformation requires far more than evidence. It requires legitimacy, coordination, institutions, incentives, governance, relationships, and people willing to sustain difficult work long after novelty has faded. In other words, it requires infrastructure. This quarter has strengthened my conviction that changemakers are often less in the business of generating solutions than of building the social architecture through which transformational solutions become ordinary. 2. Stories are transformation infrastructure Dr. Dominique Hes offered that our greatest challenges may no longer be technical but narrative. While at first glance, that can sound like a call for better communication, it is much deeper. Economics is a story. Leadership is a story. Organizations are stories. Even many of the systems we experience as fixed are, ultimately, stories that have become institutionalized over time. They shape what we notice, what we value, what we consider possible, and which futures appear legitimate before a single decision has been made. Stories do not merely describe reality. They determine what reality becomes thinkable. If that is true, stories are not decorations around change. They are part of the infrastructure through which change becomes possible. They determine which solutions feel inevitable, which feel threatening, and which remain invisible altogether. I increasingly suspect that one of the changemaker’s most important responsibilities is not merely to tell better stories, but to help societies inhabit stories capable of supporting the futures they hope to build. 3. Invisible work remains our greatest blind spot One pattern reappeared across remarkably different conversations: we consistently celebrate visible achievements while overlooking the quieter work that makes those achievements possible. Dr. Laura Mae Lindo spoke about the formation of practitioners rather than simply the methods they use. Dominique described herself as “mycelium,” quietly connecting people and ideas beneath the surface. My Father’s Day inquiry revealed that what people most remembered were rarely grand gestures. They remembered someone who believed in them before there was evidence, helped them trust themselves, or quietly expanded what they thought was possible. Perhaps invisible work feels difficult to value precisely because, when done well, it dissolves into the success of others. It leaves stronger institutions, healthier cultures, more capable people, and better decisions, but rarely obvious credit. If changemaking is to become a profession, we

  4. Jun 28

    Beyond solutions — our story problem: Interview with Dr. Dominique Hes

    I had the honor of interviewing Dr. Dominique Hes — regenerative design pioneer, educator, co-author of Designing for Hope, and one of the biggest influences on my own thinking over the past two decades. “We have become very good at changing the stuff. We have paid far less attention to changing the story.” — Dr. Dominique Hes That distinction (and how it came to matter to Dominique) framed almost everything we discussed. For years, Dominique has worked across science, engineering, architecture, and regenerative development. Yet she increasingly believes that: Our greatest challenges are no longer technical. They are narrative. Because economics is a story. Planning is a story. And so is law. organizations. and markets. Even many of the systems we experience as fixed are, ultimately, stories we collectively agreed to live inside. Stories are infrastructure. That conversation led somewhere neither of us expected: the regenerative brain. The possibility that our collective excellence in analytical, literate, reductionist thinking has left us less practiced at noticing, relationships, presence, and seeing wholes. Perhaps regeneration requires a different way of paying attention. “Listen with the intent to learn.” — Dr. Dominique Hes Listen not to reply, persuade, or defend, but to understand. That feels rare. And vital. Another lovely moment came from me asking Dominique, What kind of changemaker do you consider yourself to be? “I’m mycelium.” — Dr. Dominique Hes Not a profession. Invisible infrastructure in healthy forests. Connecting ideas, people, and places. Moving nutrients where they are needed. It struck me because invisible work was one of the themes of my Field Notes for Q1 2026. Perhaps some of the most important changemaking resembles mycelium far more than the visible leadership we tend to celebrate. Nature on the Board We also explored one of Dominique’s newest experiments: serving as the Voice of Nature on the board of Regen Melbourne. Not symbolically. Practically. She reads every board paper twice: once as Dominique (the left-hand page in her notebook) and then again as Nature (the right-hand page). Her description of the moments when the two disagree—and how that practice has changed the board’s governance — was one of the most thought-provoking parts of our conversation. What is hope? We finished on hope, which is in the title of Dominique’s book and at the heart of her work. Not hope as optimism, but hope as a practice of contribution, one relationship at a time. If you’ve been following the recent conversations here — from Laura Mae Lindo, Whitney Austin Gray, Andrew MacLeod, and now Dominique Hes — you may notice a thread emerging. Again and again, the work comes back to the same question: How do we create the conditions in which better futures become not merely imaginable — but normal? Dominique’s answer is both deceptively simple and profoundly challenging: Perhaps to expand what is possible, we must change our stories. References * Designing for Hope (2015) by Dr. Dominique Hes & Dr. Chrisna du Plessis: https://www.booktopia.com.au/designing-for-hope-dominique-hes/book/9781763874909.html?srsltid=AfmBOor4mU4litT-1fW7VPrEDuHkx_CPiZ2G5tqNjOQq8isD1fYkTstd * Mycelium Seed, Dominique’s Substack: https://myceliumseed.substack.com * Regen Melbourne: Nature on the Board https://regen.melbourne/gazette/dominique-hes-nature-on-the-board * Change the Story, Change the Future: A Living Economy for a Living Earth (2015) by David Korten. https://www.amazon.com/Change-Story-Future-Living-Economy/dp/1626562903 * Right Story, Wrong Story (2023) by Tyson Yunkaporta. https://www.amazon.com/Right-Story-Wrong-Tyson-Yunkaporta/dp/1922790958 ▶️ Watch or listen to Changemakers Handbook on Substack, Spotify, or Apple Podcasts. https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/changemakers-handbook-with-elena-bondareva/id1828981728 https://open.spotify.com/show/4MGxEQM72DhSvpURHo7IQS?si=e6cef2e629474b12 https://changemakershandbook.substack.com/about Thank you to Susan Kain, Regina Pistilli, Fiona Gray, Luke Middleton, Tim McIntosh-Hannah, Sarah Patterson, Fiona Gray, Dawna Jones, Laurie McGinley and all others who joined us live because conversations like these are always richer for our shared curiosity in real time. If this conversation resonates, please subscribe, share it with someone who thinks deeply about change, and join us for the next LIVE conversation to help build a shared body of practice for changemakers. Changemakers’ Handbook is an audience-supported publication focused on professionalizing chaangemaking in a post-solutions world. Consider subscribing to join future live conversations and to access all posts. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit changemakershandbook.substack.com/subscribe

  5. Jun 20

    What are fathers for?

    I thought that writing something that went beyond biology and stereotypes for Mothers’ Day was hard. Then I started thinking about fathering. For Mother’s Day, I found myself writing about mothering as a choice: a way of caring for what is vulnerable. It felt surprisingly coherent. Fatherhood felt different. More contested. More uneven. More shaped by personal experience. What are fathers for? In a moment when many men seem increasingly uncertain about masculinity, fatherhood, and their place in society, I wasn’t sure I knew how to answer. Partly because my own experience refuses to fit neatly into any story I know how to tell. So I asked my audience: What is something a father or father figure gave you that would have been difficult to receive elsewhere? More than fifty responses arrived from around the world. Some people answered immediately. Others took days. A surprising number struggled to answer at all, and that, too, felt significant. One person responded: “A longing for a father… If I had my father, I wouldn’t long for one in others.” Another wrote: “There is something uniquely painful about being hurt the most by the person who was supposed to love you the most. Whatever fathering is, people seem to notice both its presence and its absence. Your answers were remarkably varied Some named values: “Integrity. Work ethic.” — Sujatha “Humility.” — Jeff “Patience.” — Rick “Counsel.” — Jim “Compassion.” — Alex “High standards as a man, father, leader.” — H.G. "Discipline." - Gunther Others described confidence: “Belief — my Dad always believed in me, sometimes when I didn’t.” — Davina “Confidence in life.” — Mukt “Confidence in my abilities.” — Andrea One respondent described learning to build and repair almost anything alongside her father before concluding: “That confidence in turn birthed resilience.” Others spoke about safety: “A safe place. Acceptance. Reassurance. Rescue.” — Sara “The space to make my own decisions (and mistakes) without fear of judgement... the room to grow.” — Anthony “Security.” — Nick, Jennifer “A grounding presence.” — Paul “Unconditional support and always a safe place to land.” — Lynn “Unconditional love and support in all my decisions, even the ones he disagreed with.” — Eric One surprising answer stayed with me: “To know what it feels like to be delighted in.” — Tiffany Interestingly, this question is attracting attention far beyond my inbox. Dr. Sanjay Gupta (CNN’s Chief Medical Correspondent) has just interviewed the author of the new book Dad Brain, exploring the growing body of research on how fatherhood changes men’s brains and behavior. Who fathers us? What struck me was not just the variety of answers, but who people were talking about. Fathers, certainly. But also grandfathers. Professors. Mentors. Advisors. Stepfathers. Coaches. People who were not necessarily related to them at all. One responded opened with, “I don’t think these things are inherently masculine.” He then proceeded to describe a grandfather who taught him generosity, courage, emotional openness, humor, advocacy, and how to love with his whole heart. That response helped clarify something for me. Perhaps fathering is less about who performs it than what is contributed. Our parenting norms aren’t universal Nature itself seems remarkably unconcerned with our assumptions. Male seahorses carry pregnancies. Emu fathers incubate eggs and raise chicks. Across the animal kingdom, parenting responsibilities are distributed in countless ways. Perhaps humans are not so different. Perhaps fathering is not a category of person but a category of care. Again and again, people described fathering as modeling a way of being in the world. Sometimes that meant trust in themselves: confidence, self-reliance, resilience, ambition, a sense of worth or the room to grow. Sometimes it meant trust in how the world works: how to build, fix, compete, endure, recover, or make sense of things. And sometimes it meant trust in how to participate with integrity: how to love, how to treat others, how to stay calm, how to stand for something, how to be strong without becoming hard. And perhaps the strongest evidence that it matters is that people notice when it is there — and when it is not. So this Father’s Day, consider thanking or honoring the father figures who helped you trust yourself a little more, understand the world a little better, and participate in it a little more wisely. And to every single person who chooses to father the world: Happy Father’s Day! May you know that your care mattered, often in ways you may never fully see. Changemakers’ Handbook is an audience-supported publication focused on professionalizing chaangemaking in a post-solutions world. Consider subscribing to join future live conversations and to access all posts. Image credit: Leo Lachnit and Lisa Yount from Pixabay This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit changemakershandbook.substack.com/subscribe

  6. Jun 11

    Why I Care

    Almost two years ago, I published a piece called Why I Care. Change-maker’s Handbook (the book) came out in late 2023. I was starting to mine my twenty years of changemaking experience for patterns and lessons that may benefit others, interviewing practitioners, and shaping my PhD research. Re-reading this piece now, I am struck by how many of the themes that would later emerge in my research were already present within it — not as theory or findings, but as lived experience. Most of you would have never seen this essay, so I thought I would share it again. After the original piece, I’d like to tell you what I now see differently. _ _ _ Why I Care (2024) The baby in the photo, I was born and raised in Moscow. Now Russia, then the traumatically imploding Soviet Union and the West’s sandbox for crude experimentation in forging a democracy and a market economy from scratch. Unlike many other countries — including those of the former Soviet Union — Russia had no history of either. This was like teaching a child to swim by throwing them into the deep end: there was no muscle memory to trigger. Raised by two university professors and a veteran of one of WWII’s all-female front-line battalions, I witnessed what it meant to strip a society of its value system without meaningfully replacing it. Once-respected professionals, my mom and dad were now paid in towel fabric, plates, and promises because anybody who relied on the government was, well, instantaneously overboard without a life raft. Surgeons, police officers, and scientists were bartering on street corners. In shame, nobody was making eye contact. I was not yet seven when I — clad in layers that kept us somewhat warm via sheer bulk, not smarts — first held my parents’ spot in lines for bread, sugar, or butter in the pitch black of winter mornings. Those were, indeed, separate lines with none of the efficiency of Western food banks. As it relegated people to shuffling huddles, I looked Need in the eye before I could recognize its power over everybody in my world. It would be years before I understood the meaning of eating pancakes for dinner every night of the week. By the age of eleven or twelve, I was responsible for growing (often to be canned) our annual supply of vegetables, fruit, and berries during the summer. I still can’t throw food away. At school, we routinely sat for hours on end without teachers, who were forced out into the fickle market economy to make ends meet. There were no extracurricular activities. Playgrounds got dismembered for parts. All the parents were so preoccupied with surviving that as children, we were raising ourselves. I remember acknowledging that change was non-negotiable. Still, I knew in my gut that it need not callously decimate people’s lives. Before even hitting my teens, I remember the Moscow intersection where I first committed to finding better ways to do it; ways that did not pull the rug from under people’s feet; ways that protected the environment as well as human dignity; ways that reinvigorated rather than decimated; that unlocked possibility rather than entrenched despair. My postgraduate research at Cornell University allowed me to delve into broad-spectrum change, and I have not stopped since. I was in my 20s when, on a flight, I first wrote down my purpose, “To mobilize people to imagine and create realities far better than they have experienced.” Curiously, this has not changed for me. I don’t know if this is atypical. I accept that one’s purpose may change with time, and I wish we knew more about this; one of my standing invitation for social sciences research. Even if it took me years to see it clearly, my purpose has been my compass for over three decades. May I suggest that you have a lot to gain and nothing to lose by giving a go at distilling yours. Section 1 of my book, Change-maker’s Handbook, focuses on purpose and can guide you. It may mean all the difference in the impact and contentment you experience as a changemaker, and I would love to hear from you whether it does! https://open.substack.com/pub/changemakershandbook/p/playlist-purpose-is-fuel-for-changemaking?r=1i4aw7&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web _ _ _ When I wrote this piece, I was trying to explain myself and my commitment to better equip changemakers for their vital work. Today, I find myself asking a different question. Not why I care but why some people repeatedly find themselves caring in this particular way. The distinguishing feature is not compassion. Many people are compassionate. It is not intelligence. It is not idealism. It is not even a desire to help. What keeps catching my attention is something more specific: an inability to fully look away once certain forms of harm, contradiction, or unrealized possibility become visible. A tendency to keep asking: * Why is it like this? * Why do we accept this? * Could this work differently? * What would it take to change it? Those questions have followed me for most of my life. Increasingly, I wonder whether they have followed some of you as well. I’ve been working on something that explores that possibility. More soon. Changemakers’ Handbook is an audience-supported publication focused on professionalizing chaangemaking in a post-solutions world. Consider subscribing to join future live conversations and to access all posts. Are you a changemaker? https://open.substack.com/pub/changemakershandbook/p/how-to-spot-a-change-maker-signs?r=1i4aw7&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web Most are not changemakers https://open.substack.com/pub/changemakershandbook/p/most-people-are-not-changemakers?r=1i4aw7&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web What are changemakers for? https://open.substack.com/pub/changemakershandbook/p/what-are-changemakers-for?r=1i4aw7&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web Purpose as fuel for changemaking https://open.substack.com/pub/changemakershandbook/p/playlist-purpose-is-fuel-for-changemaking?r=1i4aw7&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit changemakershandbook.substack.com/subscribe

  7. May 31

    What are changemakers for?

    I have repeatedly spoken and written about purpose. Across earlier posts, I have argued that purpose is fuel for changemaking; explored the idea that each of us possesses gifts, experiences, and motivations that point toward particular forms of contribution; and written about superpowers, mandates, and the strange experience of feeling repeatedly drawn toward work that is neither convenient nor obviously rewarded. Those ideas remain central to my thinking. Yet the deeper I go into this work, the more they seem to point toward another question entirely: What are changemakers for? This may sound obvious, odd, or both. We tend to think of changemakers as individuals with causes, ideas, wounds, gifts, convictions, and projects. We ask what drives them, what problems they are solving, and how we can help. All useful questions. But if changemakers are real — more than a corporate buzzword or aspirational LinkedIn identity, but as people predisposed toward transformation — then another question becomes unavoidable. Why do changemakers exist? Across countries, sectors, professions, ideologies, and generations, some people seem persistently drawn to changemaking. They notice problems others normalize. They imagine alternatives others dismiss. They struggle to disengage from harms they did not create. They continue engaging long after exhaustion, cynicism, self-interest, or social pressure would have persuaded many others to stop. Not all changemakers agree. Not all succeed. Not all are even pursuing the same future. Still, they are everywhere. What if societies require transformation in the same way they require continuity? What if human communities need people who are unusually sensitive to unrealized possibility? People who repeatedly question inevitability. People who become uncomfortable when preventable harm is normalized. People willing to move toward uncertainty in pursuit of a future that does not yet exist. Goodness knows we need them now. Perhaps we always have — whether anybody, changemakers included — recognized the function clearly or not. Human beings are astonishingly capable of normalizing the unbearable. We adapt to institutions that degrade us, incentives that distort reason, technologies that outpace our ethics, economies that drain us, and narratives that shrink our hopes. This capacity to adapt can protect us. But at times, it can also trap us. Changemakers, at their best, disrupt that trap. They are not the whole answer. They are not saviors. They are not automatically wise, ethical, effective, or right. But they may perform a necessary function inside human systems: noticing where reality no longer fits the frame, where harm has been normalized, where possibility has been declared impossible too soon. Studying changemakers reminds me of immune systems Healthy immune systems do not dominate the body. They detect threats, respond to harm, support repair, and help living organisms survive what might otherwise overwhelm them. Without an immune system, the body becomes dangerously vulnerable. With an overactive or misdirected one, the body can self-sabotage. This feels increasingly useful to me as a metaphor for changemakers. A society without changemakers would likely struggle to adapt. A society composed entirely of changemakers would likely implode. The work, then, is not to romanticize changemakers. Nor is it to dilute, silence, or punish them for picking at what others would rather leave alone. The work is to understand what function they perform, what conditions allow that function to become regenerative rather than destructive, and what kinds of support, ethics, relationships, competencies, and institutions might help changemakers serve transformation well. This matters because changemakers are often treated as anomalies. Too disruptive. Too intense. Too idealistic. Too impatient. Too difficult. Too unwilling to accept “that’s just how things are.” Sometimes, all of that is fair. Yet perhaps some of what makes changemakers difficult is inseparable from what makes them useful. The person who cannot stop asking whether the system is solving the wrong problem may prevent pseudo-consensus. The person who balks at existing constraints may chip away until unrealized possibility comes into view. The person who feels responsible for harms they did not create may help an entire society take responsibility. Without changemakers, many necessary transformations may never happen. Purpose, in this sense, is not only personal. It is ecological. The question is not simply, What gives my life meaning? It may also be, What kind of contribution does the world seem to need of me? Changemakers’ contribution seems to be helping systems change before their failures become irreversible. What if that is their function? And if changemakers perform a function within transformation, the next question follows naturally: Do all changemakers play the same role? I no longer think they do. And that realization may prove just as important as discovering changemakers themselves. References: https://changemakershandbook.substack.com/p/how-to-spot-a-change-maker-signs https://changemakershandbook.substack.com/p/playlist-purpose-is-fuel-for-changemaking https://changemakershandbook.substack.com/p/most-people-are-not-changemakers Changemakers’ Handbook is an audience-supported publication focused on professionalizing changemaking in a post-solutions world. Consider subscribing to join future live conversations and to access all posts. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit changemakershandbook.substack.com/subscribe

  8. May 22

    Most people are not changemakers

    Modern “change” culture may create an impression that those oriented toward continuity, care, craft, mastery, preservation, relationship, beauty, stability, or stewardship are somehow less vital — or even less committed to humanity’s future — than those oriented toward disruption and reinvention. I do not believe this for a second. In fact, the more I practice changemaking, the more reverence I feel for people whose primary contribution to the world may not be transformation at all. My last post introduced the 6 attributes of changemakers. Now, I turn to the people whose contributions let changemakers do their thing. Theirs is not secondary work. It is civilization. I am increasingly aware that my changemaking has been made possible by countless people who are probably not changemakers themselves. The teachers who honed my potential. The people who ensured my scholarships were credited correctly to my university tuition accounts. Those who made sure I ate something wholesome. The friends who tethered me back to reality when I became a hot air balloon buoyed too far upward by causes and ideas. I owe everything I have accomplished — and likely much of what I still will — to people who built the roads I travel on, ensured fresh water and air, grew my food, tended to my health, and created art that kept weaving me back into humanity while I wrestled with how it might need to change. What studying changemakers has shown me * Changemaking is real. Not merely as a buzzword or aspirational personal brand, but as a recognizable practice of transformation. * Some individuals — I refer to them as changemakers — appear uniquely predisposed toward changemaking. They persistently ask: Why is it like this? Why do we accept this? Could this work differently? What would it take to change it? Goodness knows we need people willing to question inevitability, challenge harmful systems, imagine and build alternatives, and continue long after exhaustion, cynicism, self-interest, or social pressure would convince many others to stop. For more, see my last post: https://changemakershandbook.substack.com/p/how-to-spot-a-change-maker-signs * Our future equally depends on the people whose contributions take entirely different forms. I have become equally convinced that changemakers depend on people oriented toward many other equally vital forms of human contribution. * Importantly, changemakers do not have exclusive dibs on creating change. Nor does it mean that changemakers cannot care deeply about continuity, ethics, beauty, relationship, or stewardship. The more I study changemakers, the more I think of them as something like a society’s immune system. At their best, changemakers help societies detect harm, aim higher, adapt, and regenerate. At their worst, they are destabilizing, reckless, and destructive. Weak immune systems are dangerous, but so are overactive ones. Left entirely to themselves, changemakers might redesign civilization incessantly. Some of those redesigns would be extraordinary. Some would be catastrophic. All would be exhausting. Human flourishing has probably always depended on many different forms of devotion existing alongside one another. Which may be one reason changemakers need not only to hone their own strengths, but to cherish the countless contributions that keep us alive, connected, nourished, honest, safe, or sane long enough to do our thing at all. A future worth building takes both Perhaps maturity — especially for changemakers — involves finally recognizing that people who do not share our particular fixation on transformation are not necessarily barriers to the future we want. They may be part of the reason we survive long enough to build it. Are you a changemaker? I have been building a survey (stay tuned) to help explore that question, based on six recurring attributes my research increasingly points toward, to better understand one particular orientation toward change — and how it exists alongside many other equally vital forms of human contribution. _ _ _ Changemakers’ Handbook is an audience-supported publication focused on professionalizing changemaking in a post-solutions world. Consider subscribing to join future live conversations and to access all posts. Image credit: Eleanor Smith from Pixabay This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit changemakershandbook.substack.com/subscribe

Ratings & Reviews

5
out of 5
5 Ratings

About

Your front-row seat to PhD findings into change-making and no-holds-barred insight into my experience across 6 continents. Join me in fueling dialogue on the why, the how, the how not to, and the personal toll of creating regenerative transformation. changemakershandbook.substack.com