Better Minneapolis Podcast

Terry White

Newsletter focused on local Minneapolis politics and resident stories. www.betterminneapolis.com

  1. 2D AGO

    Good Governance Still Matters

    Competence rarely goes viral. It does not dominate headlines or trend online. But steady, smart governance is what allows cities and states to function, and voters tend to notice when it disappears. In Minnesota, Operation Metro Surge may carry long-term political consequences for Republicans. While the goal may have been short-term gains, the tactics used have likely deepened resistance in a state that already leans Democratic. Whether by design or miscalculation, the result could be that Republicans are shut out of state-wide office for many years to come. Nationally, the political landscape remains volatile. Current projections for the U.S. House of Representatives suggest Democrats could regain control if they win the 208 seats currently rated in their favor by the Cook Political Report and capture at least 10 of the 18 toss-up districts. Given President Trump’s weak polling numbers driven by controversies surrounding Epstein, ongoing corruption allegations, immigration policy, tariff disputes, and persistent inflation, Democrats are expected to make gains. Failing to do so would raise serious questions about the party’s strategy and message. The Senate presents a more difficult path. Democrats would need to win the 11 races where they are currently favored, secure all four toss-ups, and flip at least two Republican-held seats. That outcome is possible but unlikely. Even so, control of the House alone would provide a check on executive overreach and shape federal priorities for the next two years. For Minneapolis residents, stability and competence still matter. The quality of governance at every level — federal, state, and local — directly affects budgets, public safety, infrastructure, and the economic health of our communities. Political strategy may grab attention, but effective leadership is what sustains cities over time. How Could Democrats Lose Their Advantage? If Democrats want to squander the advantage they currently hold, the most effective way might be to overestimate the appeal of an anti-Trump, pro-immigration message while underestimating how much voters value competent governance of everyday essentials: schools that balance their budgets, hospitals that remain open, safe streets, and an economy that creates opportunity. Minneapolis may be viewed nationally as a bold symbol of resistance to federal immigration enforcement, but resistance alone does not make a city functional. No wave of admiration is forming around our school finance practices, hospital solvency, or economic competitiveness. That contrast should give DFL leaders pause. Cultural and political signaling may generate headlines, but voters ultimately judge those in power by whether streets are safe, budgets are balanced, and institutions are competently run. Political analyst Ruy Teixeira of The Liberal Patriot argues that Democrats’ deeper problem is not messaging — it is governance. Fraud, he writes, is only one visible symptom of a broader issue: when ideological commitments and interest-group pressures outweigh the practical demands of running government well. Voters, he suggests, ultimately judge a party by whether it delivers results. Put more plainly: if a voter wants safe streets, competent administration, efficient public services, and projects completed on time and on budget, is their first instinct to think of Democratic leadership? In many places, including Minneapolis, that confidence appears to be eroding. Governance is political advertising. When government functions poorly, it weakens the case for those in charge. Several recent developments have raised legitimate questions about whether the DFL and its elected officials are getting the basics right: * Minneapolis Public Schools recently announced that its projected 2026–27 deficit has grown from $30.3 million to $50.5 million. The district’s finance division experienced 50% turnover under its former leader, who departed after disciplinary action. To stabilize operations, the board has approved $830,000 for an outside consulting firm. For families and taxpayers, this does not inspire confidence. * Hennepin Healthcare, operator of Hennepin County Medical Center and now the largest downtown employer following Target’s downsizing, is laying off 100 full-time employees amid a $50 million shortfall. The system provides roughly $100 million in uncompensated care annually. The Hennepin County Board assumed control last year due to financial instability, and additional uncertainty — including the dissolution of UCare — could further strain the system. If conditions worsen, the greatest burden will fall on residents with the fewest resources. * Downtown economic recovery remains fragile. High vacancy rates persist, and businesses continue to struggle. Against that backdrop, the Minneapolis City Council’s public debate over reviewing liquor licenses for two hotels that served federal immigration officials struck many observers as politically performative. Whatever one’s stance on immigration enforcement, the episode raised concerns about how the city presents itself to employers and investors at a time when job growth is urgently needed. * Ongoing fraud investigations have uncovered an alarming number of conspirators and oversight failures. Rapidly escalating reimbursements and minimally vetted providers should have triggered scrutiny earlier. Residents are still asking why accountability has been limited. Republicans have centered this issue in their campaigns, and it continues to erode public trust in state government. The common thread running through all of this is not ideology but competence. Voters may share Democratic values, but shared values are not enough. What sustains political support over time is transparent budgeting, operational stability, real accountability, and sound economic stewardship. If the DFL wants to maintain its position in Minneapolis and Minnesota, it cannot assume that opposition to Trump will carry them. They must demonstrate that they can run complex institutions well. That is the standard voters ultimately apply. DFL Glide Path Minnesota’s DFL candidates for governor and U.S. Senate may have a favorable political landscape ahead of them, but strong state and federal prospects do not lessen the importance of getting local governance right. Consider the Nicollet Avenue bridge over Minnehaha Creek. Beginning March 3, the bridge is scheduled to close for two years for a long-overdue rehabilitation project estimated at $55.2 million. More than 14,000 vehicles per day will be rerouted into surrounding neighborhoods during construction. Two years is a long time for residents and businesses to absorb disruption. And fair or not, projects like this shape public perception. When voters see extended timelines and rising costs, they do not instinctively think government is operating at peak efficiency. That perception problem extends beyond a single bridge or a single party, but it is particularly relevant for the party that currently dominates state and local government. We moved to Minneapolis from the East Coast twenty years ago because of the city’s reputation for good schools, affordable housing, and a strong economy. The fact that it was a drop of blue in a sea of red appealed to us politically, but that was not the primary reason we came. We came for work, for stability, for a place to build a life. We want families and entrepreneurs around the country and the world to see Minneapolis — and Minnesota — as a world-class place to start something. To regain and sustain that reputation, we need leaders focused less on symbolic battles and more on the steady work of maintaining infrastructure, managing budgets responsibly, and ensuring that public systems function well. Competence rarely electrifies a crowd, but it determines who earns the public’s trust. When families weigh which leaders can deliver opportunity and manage the fundamentals of daily life, they reward performance. If the party in power fails to produce tangible results, voters will hand that responsibility to someone else. Signal: bttrmpls.33 Get full access to Better Minneapolis at www.betterminneapolis.com/subscribe

    13 min
  2. 6D AGO

    City Council Divided Over Withholding Hotel Liquor Licenses

    The Minneapolis City Council suspended its regular committee meetings on January 26, citing “ongoing community needs” related to the presence of federal immigration agents in the city. Since then, the Committee of the Whole has wrestled with whether to withhold liquor license approvals for two downtown hotels — Canopy by Hilton and the Depot Minneapolis, a Renaissance hotel. At issue is whether the city can use its licensing authority to pressure private businesses not to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement. On February 17, after a lengthy debate, the committee voted 7–6 to send the matter to the full Council without a recommendation. The Committee of the Whole determines which items advance to the full Council and, if so, whether they do so with a recommendation. The full Council is scheduled to take up the issue on Thursday, February 19, at 9:30 a.m. When we stopped watching to finish this newsletter, the debate had stretched into its fifth hour. The packed agenda was partly due to delays tied to Operation Metro Surge. Business Fallout from ICE Controversy In this section, we examine two actions that reflect how the Council is responding to businesses connected to ICE activity. The first involved Council Member Wonsley’s proposal to block the appointment of Michael Berk to the Stadium Village Special Service District Advisory Board. Berk is part of the management group for the Graduate Hotel on Washington Avenue, where ICE agents stayed and where multiple noise protests later occurred. An internal message from Berk to hotel employees — leaked on Reddit last month — asked staff to treat ICE agents as they would any other guests. The message sparked significant backlash online, with some commenters sharply criticizing his stance. It is unclear how much that online reaction influenced the Council’s decision. During the meeting, however, City Attorney Quinn O’Reilly cautioned members against screening advisory board appointees based on their political views. Council Member Wonsley argued that the “criminalization of protesters” had taken place and that the hotel’s management bore at least some responsibility. Council Members Rainville, Palmisano, Vetaw, and Warren voted against blocking the appointment. Council Member Whiting abstained. Mixing Liquor and Guns After the vote on Berk’s appointment, the Council turned to the legal and ethical arguments surrounding whether hotels could be denied liquor license renewals for providing rooms to ICE agents. The matter will be decided at the full Council meeting on February 19. By a 7–6 vote, the motion was forwarded without recommendation. Council Members Whiting, Warren, Rainville, Osman, Palmisano, Shaffer, and Vetaw voted to move it forward. The remaining six members sought additional time for investigation. Council Member Warren expressed frustration with the review process, saying members were “throwing confetti in the air to see what sticks to the static balloon.” She called the effort “ridiculous” and “discriminatory,” and warned the city was “shooting itself in the foot” with these types of actions. Tensions among members were evident throughout the debate. Council Member Vetaw said, “We’re doing what Trump did to Jimmy Kimmel. We’re using what power we have to get rid of what we don’t like.” She cited the city’s prior attempt to suspend the liquor license of Merwin Liquors at North Lyndale and West Broadway after community complaints about crime associated with the business. At that time, the Council ultimately granted the license based on legal advice that the establishment had not violated city rules. Vetaw argued that disregarding similar legal guidance now would represent a shift in standards. City Attorney Quinn O’Reilly was repeatedly asked to clarify legal questions. He noted that occupation is not a protected class under the law — a point some members interpreted as meaning businesses could legally refuse service based on someone’s employment with ICE. Council Member Chowdhury emphasized safety concerns, referencing the presence of firearms carried by federal agents in hotel spaces where alcohol is served. One speaker testified about reports questioning ICE’s hiring and training processes, arguing that inadequate screening could increase the risk of injury. Of the ten people who testified, most described the presence of ICE as creating unsafe working conditions. Multiple representatives of Unite 17, which represents hotel employees, spoke in support of that view. The first speaker, however, expressed concern about job security as a banquet server, warning that reduced business would mean fewer hours and lower pay. Council Member Rainville returned to that theme several times, saying hotel owners had told him that businesses were canceling future events because of uncertainty surrounding the liquor licenses. Council Member Chughtai questioned that assertion and said she wanted to verify whether events had in fact been canceled and for those stated reasons. We are necessarily summarizing a lengthy debate. Council Member Shaffer distilled the argument for approving the licenses: “We’re sending a message that Minneapolis is not a stable environment for business.” Supporters of the license restrictions framed their concerns primarily around safety and accountability. Opponents warned that using licensing authority in this manner could establish a precedent in which the city weighs political considerations alongside regulatory compliance. The tension between expressing community values and maintaining predictable business standards is likely to shape the final vote. Council members appear united in their belief that ICE’s presence and tactics have harmed the city and its businesses. How to respond and what response is justified remain open questions. Signal: bttrmpls.33 Get full access to Better Minneapolis at www.betterminneapolis.com/subscribe

    9 min
  3. FEB 15

    The World is Watching Minnesota, No Pressure

    Note: We are featuring photos of New Mexico in this issue. Frank Spring is based there, and we lived in the state for five years after college. Los Alamos is the birthplace of the atomic bomb. The New York Times recently published an article about New Mexico’s fight with the U.S. Department of Energy over cleaning up radioactive waste that still sits in massive pools dating back to the 1940s. It’s worth a read: “New Mexico Rebukes Federal Agency Over Nuclear Waste at Los Alamos.” “The continued presence of a large volume of unremedied hazardous and radioactive waste demonstrates a longstanding lack of urgency by the U.S. Department of Energy,” regulators wrote in a statement, “and elevates the risk of waste storage failures” at the lab, in northern New Mexico. In case you missed it (ICYMI): The only remaining arms control treaty between the United States and Russia expired last week. The Department of Energy is planning to produce nuclear bomb cores at Los Alamos as part of a $1.7 trillion federal effort to modernize the nation’s nuclear weapons. Critics argue this represents another step backward in national policy. There Are Facts, and Then There Are Government Reports Disputes over how many people have been detained by the Department of Homeland Security are fueling disagreement and mistrust. Some government sources have claimed that 4,000 people in Minnesota have been detained. That number has been widely questioned and has contributed to growing distrust in government information. The dispute over this figure is not the only one people are debating. In the financial world, there are also doubts about reported employment numbers, job creation, and inflation. A 2025 Gallup/Bentley University poll found that only about one-third (31 percent) of U.S. adults say they have “a lot” or “some” trust in the federal government. Recent actions by ICE agents in Minnesota, along with misleading public statements made by Kristi Noem and others about those actions, may have pushed that number even lower. Many people say they are frustrated when public officials share inaccurate figures or conflicting accounts. This frustration adds to broader skepticism about government reporting and transparency. What has been on display for some time now is that shaping the narrative often takes priority over confronting reality. There appears to be little motivation to pursue solutions grounded in facts. Instead, the goal seems to be charting a path based on how President Trump and his allies want events to be understood. That dynamic is one reason we featured Frank Spring in today’s newsletter. Spring is a founding partner at Altum Insights and managing partner and cofounder of Undaunted Ventures. He has built his career studying how people’s attitudes and biases influence elections. His focus is on identifying the gap between facts and perception and on understanding how beliefs drive behavior. The stories we tell ourselves about events can be more powerful than the events themselves. This administration has placed heavy emphasis on shaping those narratives. What we have seen in Minnesota is a shared determination among residents to define that narrative for themselves. The broader lesson is clear: collective action can shape public understanding. When people come together to tell their own stories, they can influence how their community and the wider world interpret what is happening. Interview Summary In this interview, I speak with Frank Spring, a narrative consultant who studies how stories shape political beliefs and behavior. Spring explains that politics is not just about policies, but about the stories leaders tell and the stories voters tell themselves about who they are and what their country represents. He says the current administration believes there is a “silent majority” of Americans who feel threatened by immigration and social change. In response, leaders have tried to create strong narratives about crime, disorder, and the need for crackdowns in cities like Minneapolis. Spring argues that this strategy has not worked as planned in Minneapolis. He says many Americans are not strongly anti-immigrant but instead want an orderly and fair immigration system. When federal agents used force in Minneapolis and officials defended those actions, Spring believes it caused what he calls a “moral injury.” By that, he means people saw authorities harm others and then deny or misrepresent what happened. He says this deepened public anger and distrust, especially when videos and firsthand accounts contradicted official statements. The conversation also explores the future of media and public trust. Spring says traditional news outlets are struggling, and more people are turning to citizen journalism and social media for information. While this shift creates risks, he believes new forms of independent and community-based journalism could emerge. He also notes growing concern about artificial intelligence and its potential to spread misinformation. Overall, he predicts higher civic engagement, stronger grassroots organizing, and significant political consequences in upcoming elections. Get full access to Better Minneapolis at www.betterminneapolis.com/subscribe

    1 hr
  4. FEB 11

    The 2,300-mile “Walk for Peace” Arrives in Washington, D.C.

    It would have been fitting if the monks who walked from Fort Worth, Texas, to Washington, D.C., to promote peace had been able to stop in Minneapolis along the way. Governor Tim Walz has said he believes ICE agents will be leaving the state within days. If that proves true, the Minnesota left behind after Operation Metro Surge will be markedly different from the one federal immigration agents first encountered. For many residents, their presence has felt less like a law enforcement action and more like a natural disaster — sudden, disruptive, and terrifying. Schools and businesses have emptied. Some storefronts are boarded up. Families are staying inside, afraid to draw attention to themselves. At the same time, neighbors have banded together, delivering food and medicine and checking in on one another. In many practical ways, people are doing what they can to protect those around them. The bonds formed in moments like this between neighbors, friends, and like-minded residents resisting what feels like a hostile invasion are likely to outlast the operation itself. Long after the SUVs with tinted windows and obscured plates have left our streets, those relationships will remain, shaped by a shared experience of fear, solidarity, and care. There are, of course, important differences between what Minneapolis is experiencing and a natural disaster. For one, residents are not waiting for help from the federal government. If anything, many are acting on the assumption that no help is coming. Congress is struggling to agree on basic guardrails for immigration enforcement, such as whether agents should be allowed to conceal their identities. The federal government appears paralyzed and may partially shut down. Where the comparison does hold is in what comes next. As with any disaster, the cameras will leave. The reporters will move on. Minneapolis, meanwhile, will be left to reckon with the aftermath: an estimated $100 million carved out of the local economy, families forced to navigate the costly and painful process of reunification, and residents who have spent weeks in a state of crisis now expected to return to something resembling normal life. Instead of federal aid, the response is coming locally. City leaders are proposing a temporary ban on evictions and would like to commit an additional $1 million toward preventing displacement. The city is shifting $500,000 from the Fire Department’s budget to fund legal defense and exploring the creation of a $5 million pool to support small businesses struggling to survive the disruption. These measures may help, but they also underscore a stark reality: Minneapolis is being asked to absorb the costs of a federal action largely on its own. The state legislative session begins February 17, and it remains an open question whether lawmakers will deliver additional local government aid to help cities recover. Stemming the Tide of Tyranny We don’t pretend to know the single best way to halt what feels like a growing slide toward authoritarianism in this country. The expanding presence of ICE with its increased budget, broader mandate, and aggressive tactics is only one visible manifestation of a larger pattern. That pattern is evident elsewhere as well: in the erosion of democratic norms, in the casual acceptance of self-enrichment and political favoritism, and in the insistence that truth itself bends to power. In a recent Atlantic essay, “Yes, It’s Fascism,” Jonathan Rauch explains why he has come to believe the term applies to Donald Trump. Central to his argument is the deliberate demolition of norms and the open glorification of force and violence as political tools. That worldview is echoed by Trump adviser Stephen Miller, who has described politics in starkly amoral terms: “We live in a world, in the real world, that is governed by strength, that is governed by force, that is governed by power.” We contrast that belief — that might makes right — with the example set by the several dozen Buddhist monks who walked 2,300 miles to Washington, D.C., to raise awareness of peace, loving kindness, and compassion. Along the way, they endured extreme weather and even a tragic accident that cost one monk his leg. Their leader, Bhikkhu Pannakara, explained that the walk was not a protest, but an effort to “awaken the peace that already lives within each of us.” At our most optimistic, we believe messages like this can still reach people who have traded compassion for the political rewards of coercion. At other moments, that optimism falters. What sustains us are the many forms of peaceful resistance already taking shape — from marches and vigils to quieter acts of solidarity, like knitting circles raising funds for local immigration aid by knitting red resistance hats like those worn by Norwegians in the 1940’s. We don’t know which actions will matter most. It may be marches, music, or mutual aid, or more likely a combination of all the various tactics being used. At a minimum, we can insist on adoption of the basic guardrails now being proposed by Democrats in the federal spending bill, including judicial warrants for home entries, visible identification for agents, a ban on masks, and meaningful local oversight. These are not radical demands. They are basic rights and reasonable limits on a federal agency that has expanded rapidly with little resistance — until it arrived in Minneapolis. Get full access to Better Minneapolis at www.betterminneapolis.com/subscribe

    8 min
  5. FEB 8

    How Republicans Could Win Statewide in Minnesota

    The tragedy unfolding in Minnesota as a result of overzealous immigration enforcement has, for now, strengthened the Democratic Party. Moderate and more left-leaning factions have united in opposition to government overreach and illegal ICE tactics. However, turning this unity into electoral success will require vigilance around a familiar vulnerability: fraud. Republicans will use it aggressively against them. Unity around how to confront and prevent fraud would improve Democrats’ chances in the midterm elections and strengthen the state overall. Republicans are offering a timely example of how a party can erode support from the political center by allowing extremists to set the agenda. Extremism is a Failed Playbook Republicans have taken a page from the Democratic playbook in turning public support into aggressive opposition. If they had kept their focus on fraud and mismanagement—issues they leveraged into removing Tim Walz as a candidate for governor—and avoided pivoting to supercharged immigration enforcement, they might have had a chance to win statewide races. Instead, Republicans failed to understand that many people who hold racist beliefs do not want to be seen as racists. This miscalculation has left only the most extreme members of the party willing to openly support Republican candidates. Where they could have expanded their appeal, they instead managed to shrink it. There is a lesson here for Democratic leadership. What Republicans have engaged in is a kind of political self-immolation: allowing the loudest, most extreme, and most aggressive voices in the party to set policy and direction. Governing by the likes and comments of a social media feed is a recipe for failure—regardless of party. Now is the moment for Democrats to attract voters who have abandoned the party in the past, if they can demonstrate a willingness to clean up government, curb wasteful overspending, and put common-sense oversight of social programs in place. Democrats owe it to the families of Renee Good and Alex Pretti to keep MAGA-style Republicans out of office and prevent them from enacting policies that are undermining the economic, social, and political foundations of our state and country. To succeed, Democrats must expand their base, and that requires stepping back from condescending virtue signaling and focusing instead on programs and policies that demonstrate practical, competent governance. Operation Metro Surge has been a disaster on multiple levels. It has shown the country, and even the world, the worst impulses of the Republican Party. It has revealed the extent to which Republicans are willing to disregard the Constitution, the law, and long-standing democratic norms. Resistance from Minnesotans appeared to catch them off guard, and the response was increased brutality. Trump’s memes, along with those of his right-wing influencers, have laid bare the depth of their racism, whether further proof was needed or not. This will not fade away. The midterms will be the first real opportunity for Democrats to reject it. They cannot afford to hand momentum back to Republicans, which could easily happen once federal agents withdraw from the state. Holding onto the High Ground If Democrats want to maintain the moral high ground they currently occupy, they must be consistent in demanding accountability and transparency in social programs. Consider the findings from the recent review of claims in high-risk social programs administered by the Department of Human Services. The Star Tribune reported, “Ninety percent of claims that Medicaid-funded autism intervention providers billed the state for over a four-year period veered from acceptable standards.” That level of fraud or incompetence cannot be ignored. Government officials failed badly in their responsibility to manage taxpayer funds, and the department heads overseeing these programs should lose their jobs. The politicians who sponsored the legislation creating these programs would best serve the state by becoming the loudest advocates for cleaning up the rot. John Connolly, the agency’s deputy commissioner and the state Medicaid director, said during a press briefing that the findings will be shared with the state Attorney General and the U.S. Attorney’s Office. He added that mass resignations of federal prosecutors have complicated efforts to prosecute fraud in Minnesota. The Star Tribune further reports: The report excludes the names of providers but identifies the types of programs vulnerable to what it calls an “egregious pattern” of irregular claims. Connolly said these range from billing for services that are not clinically justified to documentation that is nonsensical. The programs that stood out include autism intervention, nonemergency medical transportation, and housing stabilization services. The state shut down the housing stabilization program in October amid allegations of widespread fraud . . . Connolly said it could take years for the state to reimagine its social service programs in ways that prevent further wrongdoing, an issue that is expected to be a major focus of the upcoming legislative session. Years of Cleanup Democrats could easily misread their current level of public support and fumble the moment. Most people oppose detaining individuals simply because of the color of their skin. They also oppose overcrowded detention facilities that bear an unsettling resemblance to concentration camps. People want warrants and strong protections for the First, Second, and Fourth Amendments. At the same time, many people also want a functional immigration policy that rewards those who follow the rules and recognizes that deportation is justified in certain cases. They want those carrying out deportations to remove their masks, operate transparently, and be held accountable for their actions. Most people are also strongly opposed to the theft of taxpayer dollars, especially when they themselves are struggling with high taxes, rent, education costs, and health care. The massive fraud that has occurred in this state will remain an issue for years. It will be a sledgehammer Republicans use repeatedly. Democrats must find a way to contain fraud, waste, and extremism within their own ranks if they want a chance to win back control of the U.S. Senate and the presidency. They cannot rely on Republicans to continue destroying themselves. Instead, Democrats must stay ahead of the narrative by clearly explaining that helping those who need it most requires functional social programs that distribute benefits as intended. Signal: bttrmpls.33 Get full access to Better Minneapolis at www.betterminneapolis.com/subscribe

    10 min
  6. FEB 5

    The Toll on Businesses in Minneapolis is Steep

    The Minneapolis small business community, particularly its restaurants, is feeling the effects of Operation Metro Surge. While immigrant-owned businesses along Lake Street appear to be facing the sharpest downturn, with the Lake Street Council estimating that 50% of the 1,652 businesses have closed in the last two months, restaurants and small businesses across the city are also being impacted. This conversation with French Meadow Bakery owner Marlene Leiva highlights how precarious the moment has become, not only for business owners but for the entire network that depends on them, including delivery drivers, farmers, and other small vendors. Although some relief efforts are underway, such as the GoFundMe for Mercado Central, and support from the Minneapolis Foundation and the ConnectUp! Institute, they are unlikely to be sufficient on their own. Without a meaningful economic recovery plan from the city and state, the damage now unfolding risks deepening into a broader economic crisis. The Community Call Fundraiser A community response supporting local businesses and the people who work for them SATURDAY, FEB 7, 2026 — 2:00 - 6:00 PM; Mayor Jacob Frey to attend @ 2:30 At French Meadow’s Nord Social Hall, 2610 Lyndale Avenue S Raffle, Silent Auction, DJ, Food Suggested Donation $20+ or pay what you can Interview Summary Marlene Leiva became the owner of French Meadow Bakery in September 2025, stepping into restaurant ownership just as Minneapolis entered another period of upheaval. A longtime resident who built her career in real estate, Leiva was drawn to the restaurant business by a belief in food as a way to build community and bring people together. But only a few months into ownership, she finds herself navigating challenges she never anticipated, ones that go far beyond the already thin margins of the restaurant industry. Leiva says the increased ICE presence in the city has had an immediate and severe impact on her business. Staffing has become unpredictable, with some employees, citizens included, afraid to travel to work. Vendors are affected as well, as reduced sales force smaller orders throughout the supply chain. On top of that, cancellations of private events have surged, often from out-of-state customers who believe Minneapolis is unsafe based on news coverage. Since she took over, Leiva estimates foot traffic at French Meadow has dropped by roughly 40 percent, a decline that makes day-to-day operations increasingly unsustainable. Despite the strain, Leiva continues to push forward, supporting a payroll of roughly 75 employees and drawing on income from her other businesses to keep the restaurant afloat. She worries, however, that if conditions persist for months, many small restaurants won’t survive. Leiva is frustrated by the lack of visible city support for businesses like hers and says words alone won’t pay vendors or employees. Still, she remains committed to Minneapolis, organizing a fundraiser for struggling small businesses and insisting the city is safe and worth supporting. For her, keeping French Meadow’s doors open is about more than one restaurant—it is about preserving a sense of normalcy, dignity, and community in a city she calls home. Get full access to Better Minneapolis at www.betterminneapolis.com/subscribe

    25 min
  7. Bad Bunny vs. Turning Point USA

    FEB 4

    Bad Bunny vs. Turning Point USA

    Spectacle of Spectacles Super Bowl LX, between the Seattle Seahawks and the New England Patriots on Sunday, will likely generate debate about the presence and tactics of ICE in Minnesota. The National Football League typically tries to keep politics separate from its enormously profitable game, but that became unavoidable when it chose Bad Bunny as its halftime performer. On Sunday, February 1, the artist won three Grammy Awards: Best Album (DeBí TiRAR MáS FOTos), Best Global Music Performance, and Best Música Urbana Album. The NFL didn’t invite him for his politics and will almost certainly ask him to leave them at home during his performance. But during his Grammy acceptance speech, Bad Bunny made his views clear, saying, “Before I say thanks to God, I’m gonna say: ICE out.” The NFL invited him because he is a global superstar who will attract millions of viewers to the halftime show—viewers that translate directly into higher advertising revenue. Bloomberg reports that a 30-second Super Bowl ad now costs between $8 million and $10 million. When musicians and athletes begin speaking out on public issues, it’s often a sign that “normal” voters are paying attention. In another example of this crossover, the Minnesota Timberwolves recently wore warm-up shirts reading “Stand with Minnesota” and released a statement referencing the “times of hardship and need” facing the state. While celebrity endorsements have a mixed record when it comes to producing substantive change, they do signal that the chaos and abuse we’re experiencing are being felt even by those who usually tune politics out. Fans who oppose Bad Bunny’s politics will have an alternative. They can change the channel and watch a halftime show hosted by Turning Point USA, featuring Kid Rock alongside country music performers Brantley Gilbert, Lee Brice, and Gabby Barrett. These competing halftime options are symbolic of the parallel belief systems operating in America today. Some oppose ICE, view its tactics as illegal, and believe they are trying to manipulate us with fear and intimidation rather than immigration enforcement. And some believe that if paid protesters were to simply stand down, ICE could do its job. They often devalue the contribution immigrants have made to the country. There is very little overlap between these two groups. Perhaps the one common denominator this Sunday will be that both sides are drinking beer over bowls of guacamole made with avocados picked by Mexican laborers earning about $10 a day. The Beef with Policing If you are among the rare Americans who socialize with people holding different political views than your own, there may be some heated debates this weekend about the role local police and the Hennepin County Sheriff should play when it comes to federal immigration officials. According to “czar” Tom Homan, Sheriff Dawanna Witt could resolve the current standoff simply by opening the Hennepin County jail to ICE agents. In a recent interview with CBS, Sheriff Witt said she felt “scapegoated.” There are several complications with opening the jail to federal agents, including the risk of lawsuits if inmates are held longer than legally allowed. The federal government is not going to step in to cover defense costs or legal fees. Sheriff Witt has said the county will hold someone for federal agents if they present a warrant signed by a judge. One critical factor in this dispute is the complete lack of trust between the agencies involved. Even if Hennepin County were to grant the Department of Homeland Security everything it wants, there is no guarantee that DHS would reduce its presence or change its tactics. Local police find themselves in a similarly difficult position. In a politics-free environment, officers would be responsible for enforcing the law regardless of whether the individual involved is a federal agent or a private citizen. In a recent Star Tribune opinion piece, Community Safety Commissioner Toddrick Barnette wrote: Officers also have a duty to intervene if they observe clearly excessive force, and we will document injuries or property damage caused by federal agents just as we would in any other case. All engagement decisions are reviewed at the command level or by the chief of police. In every instance, the goal is de-escalation. We reached out to Barnette’s office to ask whether this approach is the same as the executive order Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson signed, known as “ICE On Notice.” That order directs police to document illegal actions by federal agents and forward those cases to the county attorney for prosecution. Mayor Johnson told Democracy Now! host Amy Goodman that the goal was accountability and transparency. The procedure outlined by Barnette in his Opinion are not new for the MPD. We were told the situation isn’t quite as clear-cut as Mayor Johnson suggests. For example, if an agent is masked and lacks visible identification, prosecuting a crime becomes extremely difficult. That reality—more than concerns about doxing—may help explain why federal agents are wearing masks. Still, videos captured by observers could lead to prosecutions. Without citizen-recorded footage, the public would be entirely reliant on the federal government’s version of events. Georgia Fort explained the importance of video documentation in an interview with Rachel Maddow on MS Now. She cited the manipulated photo of Nekima Levy Armstrong as an example. Without alternative images showing Armstrong’s actual expression during her arrest, the public would be left with a government-released photo altered to depict her crying, with her skin tone darkened. This kind of manipulation makes trusting official narratives—and promises about when a drawdown might occur—nearly impossible. Fort and Don Lemon were both prepared to voluntarily turn themselves in for arrest, but DHS instead sought to capture images of them in handcuffs. Actions like these suggest that much of what the federal government is doing is driven more by public relations than by public safety. Puerto Rico Wins Regardless of who wins the Super Bowl, the world will see a proud Puerto Rican singing at halftime. In many ways, they will be witnessing the American dream made real. Born in a small town outside San Juan to a truck driver and a schoolteacher, Benito Antonio Martínez went from bagging groceries and uploading songs to SoundCloud to becoming the biggest global music star. Whether you watch Bad Bunny, tune into Turning Point USA, or protest the Super Bowl altogether, it’s worth remembering that America was widely seen as a beacon of opportunity, free speech, and democracy. That reputation has been compromised by illegal searches, handcuffing women to bathroom sinks, public arrests of journalists, and masked agents roaring through cities in unmarked SUVs. These tactics are the hallmarks of dictators. That damage could be compounded by unnecessary meddling in state elections. If you care about the flag and about democracy, this is a moment to consider how America is being perceived, whether you’re watching the game in Minneapolis, San Juan, Caracas, or Tehran. Get full access to Better Minneapolis at www.betterminneapolis.com/subscribe

    10 min
  8. FEB 1

    Minneapolis and the Dual State

    Staying Put Despite ICE A friend texted me last week to say he could see Mark Zuckerberg’s 387-foot yacht, Launchpad, from his hotel room in Playa del Carmen, Mexico. Part of me wished I were there, too, far away from the arbitrary searches and the violence that have become familiar sights on the streets of Minneapolis. But he was writing to ask what was happening here in Minneapolis. And that question made something clear to me: there’s nowhere else I’d rather be right now. It has been inspiring to watch neighbors and strangers stand together, pushing back against a system of power that feels increasingly detached from accountability and the rule of law. What we’re witnessing is what some political theorists describe as a “dual state”—one that preserves legal process for some, while suspending it for others. On the ground, that system is being enforced by ICE agents. They are paid with public dollars to carry out the directives of President Trump and his closest advisers, particularly Stephen Miller. While ICE agents are the visible face of this enforcement and bear the brunt of public anger, they are not the architects of the policy. They are functionaries. The authority that allows masked agents to operate with weapons drawn and minimal transparency flows directly from the White House. The purpose of the bike rally past Alex Pretti’s memorial, the human S.O.S. on Bde Maka Ska, the candlelight vigil at Lake Nokomis, and countless other acts of protest has been consistent: keep pressure on federal immigration enforcement to leave Minneapolis and end a cycle of fear affecting our community. In the weeks since the fatal shootings of Renee Good and Alex Pretti by federal agents, everyday acts of kindness and bravery have played out alongside protest. This morning, we began our social media consumption by watching footage of a woman from St. Peter, Minn., refuse to exit her car even after being threatened by three masked men pointing guns. In the aftermath of Good’s and Pretti’s deaths, that stood out as a profound act of courage and a visceral illustration of the tension and fear gripping our city and state. A judge recently denied Minnesota’s request for an injunction to halt “Operation Metro Surge,” the federal immigration enforcement operation in Minneapolis, meaning the presence of agents will continue for now, and the anxiety many are living with will persist. We don’t yet know how much longer this will last, but there’s hope that as more cities join the protest movement, the national chorus calling for accountability will reach the White House. Demonstrations have spread this week to New York City, Boston, Los Angeles, and Austin. However, it isn’t lost on us that images of protest and statements of solidarity are being shared on platforms like Facebook—platforms that reap enormous profits from our attempts to find and sustain online community. We help pay for Zuckerberg’s $300 million luxury yacht with our clicks, likes, and photos. The tech billionaires who stood behind Trump at his inauguration included Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Sundar Pichai, Mark Zuckerberg, and Tim Cook. Business Insider reports that Musk, Bezos, Zuckerberg, and Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang collectively made $288 billion in Trump’s first year. We Are in the Midst of a Rupture Canada’s Prime Minister, Mark Carney, gave a striking speech at the World Economic Forum this year. In it, he described the current moment as a rupture, a break from the accepted world order. Rather than pretending otherwise, Carney urged other nations to acknowledge the change and begin forming new coalitions suited to this reality. At the same time, amid the chaos generated by the Trump administration, the stock market has continued to climb, hovering near all-time highs. These numbers may matter more to the president than poll results or the size of protests in the streets. Market performance creates an illusion of stability or what the German legal scholar Ernst Fraenkel described as the “normative state” in his 1941 book, “The Dual State.” Fraenkel argued that authoritarian systems endure because, for most people, life appears normal. They work, vacation, and go out to brunch. The rules that govern their daily lives remain largely intact and predictable. This normalcy coexists with a second reality, which he called the “prerogative state,” where certain groups are subjected to unlimited arbitrariness and violence, unchecked by legal guarantees. What we are experiencing acutely in Minneapolis, and increasingly across the country, is this dual state in action. For some, especially in other states, life continues uninterrupted. In Minnesota, however, we are seeing the dual state up close. Wanton brutality is observed daily. For much of the country, life can go on, for now, as normal. From the outside, it is easy to dismiss those resisting as agitators. In reality, they include a 72-year-old retiree and a mother of three who can no longer look away from what is happening. Most of the people participating have never protested in their lives and are now volunteering to pack food boxes or standing on street corners in freezing temperatures with whistles. The rupture Carney described is not abstract. It is already here, unevenly distributed, and impossible to ignore. The question is how to reach those living comfortably in the normative state and help them recognize that a rupture has occurred. What feels normal may not last, and a prerogative state already exists, pulling more people into it. There is a growing concern that if this condition hardens, it will lead the country to a dark place. In thinking through that challenge, we came across a proposal from Scott Galloway. He is an academic, an entrepreneur, and a co-host of the podcast Pivot with Kara Swisher. He is calling for what he describes as an “economic strike.” His idea targets the companies that drive the stock market and, in his view, enable the current administration. More details about the effort can be found at resistandunsubscribe.com. Galloway proposes a one-month mass unsubscribe from services provided by Amazon, Apple, Google, Microsoft, Meta, and others. It’s an imperfect but intriguing concept. If it gained real traction, it could offer a way to puncture the divide between the normative and prerogative states. The stock market’s recent strength has been heavily dependent on these firms, and meaningful disruption would not go unnoticed. Regardless of how people choose to participate, some form of action is necessary if we are to avoid slowly accepting capricious and unlawful behavior as the new normal. Trump has repeatedly expressed admiration for leaders like Vladimir Putin, whose power is reinforced by oligarchs invested in regime stability because it protects their wealth. No one is calling for a market collapse that would erase savings or cost families their homes. But it is becoming harder to deny that some form of disruption may be needed to stir widespread resistance to creeping authoritarianism. Get full access to Better Minneapolis at www.betterminneapolis.com/subscribe

    10 min

About

Newsletter focused on local Minneapolis politics and resident stories. www.betterminneapolis.com

You Might Also Like