Beatles Rewind Podcast

Steve Weber and Cassandra

Beatles. All day, every day. Eight Days a Week !!! beatlesrewind.substack.com

  1. 6H AGO

    A Penny For Your Pick: The Beatles' Guitar Plectra

    There’s a persistent legend about Paul McCartney that feels too charming to be fake. The story goes that Sir Paul—a man who could afford a gold-plated factory—used to make his guitar picks by lining up pennies on train tracks and letting a locomotive do the flattening. Whether it was a one-time experiment or a career-long habit is up for debate, but the image of the world’s most famous bassist scavenging for flattened copper is irresistible. It’s also, in a strange way, the perfect introduction to how the Beatles approached the humble guitar pick. These small, almost disposable pieces of plastic—or apparently, occasionally, smashed currency—were the first point of contact between the players and the music. And the choices they made, from cheap celluloid in Liverpool coffeehouses to the specific picks that helped define some of the most recorded bass lines in history, turn out to be more interesting than anyone who’s never lost a pick under their couch cushion might expect. The Skiffle Years and the Hardware Shop Problem 🎵 When John Lennon formed the Quarrymen in 1956, the available guitar equipment in Liverpool was, to put it diplomatically, limited. The picks available in British music shops were basic celluloid affairs, thin and cheap, the kind that came in whatever was on the shelf. You played what you could get. The picks of the era offered a blend of flexibility and brightness that worked okay for strumming chords on a skiffle guitar. The main choices were the teardrop shape and the slightly wider “home plate” profile—so called because of its resemblance to baseball’s fourth base.🎶 The Home Plate Era 🎸 As the Quarrymen evolved—Johnny and the Moondogs, the Silver Beetles, eventually the Beatles—and as the group tightened up through their relentless Hamburg residencies, the three guitarists developed a shared preference. All three—Paul, John Lennon, and George Harrison—were known for favoring a “home plate” shaped pick during the Beatles years. It looked like a standard pick but with slightly different side angles, giving it a marginally different feel in the hand and a slightly different attack on the string. In photographs and film from the Cavern Club era through the peak touring years, this shape appears consistently, clutched between thumb and forefinger as they hammered away. 🎤 The specific brand that gets mentioned most frequently in this context is Bert Weedon, a British guitarist whose instruction book Play in a Day was quite literally the manual for an entire generation of British rock musicians. McCartney, Harrison, Keith Richards, Eric Clapton, all of them were influenced by Weedon’s book, which made the basics of guitar accessible to working-class British kids in a way nothing else had. ✨ John’s Teardrop 🎵 While all three shared the home plate preference as a group default, John Lennon’s personal pick of choice evolved to a celluloid teardrop-shaped medium. Unassuming, common, the kind of pick that cost almost nothing and was easily lost and easily replaced. The teardrop medium was well suited to Lennon’s role in the band. He was primarily a rhythm guitarist — something he was somewhat defensive about during his lifetime but which musicologists have increasingly recognized as a brilliant and underrated skill. The chord-driven strumming and chopping that powered songs like “A Hard Day’s Night” and “I Feel Fine” was rhythm guitar work of a very high order, and a medium celluloid teardrop was exactly the right tool. Not too stiff to strum, not too floppy to lose definition. 🎸 George’s Evolution 🌟 George started where everyone starts: basic celluloid mediums, the standard issue of the era. His early playing on guitars like the Höfner Club 40 and then the Gretsch Duo Jet didn’t require anything more specialized. But as Harrison’s playing deepened—as he moved from competent lead guitarist to one of the most distinctive voices on the instrument—his approach to picks evolved alongside everything else. Over time, George adopted the 351 pick shape in medium celluloid, the same general family as where he started, but more deliberately chosen. The pick that let him move between the delicate fingerpicked passages he loved and the more aggressive lead work that appeared as the band’s music grew more complex. 🎶 Paul McCartney: The Bassist Who Never Got the Memo 🎸 The convention in bass playing, established well before McCartney ever touched the instrument, was fingerstyle. The great Motown bassists—James Jamerson chief among them, an artist McCartney genuinely admired—used their fingers. Fingerstyle gives bass a warmer, rounder tone with more dynamic variation. It was the accepted approach, the “proper” technique, the thing bass players just did. McCartney had none of this training and did not particularly care. A pick on the Höfner 500/1 violin bass produces a sharper, brighter attack than fingers would — more presence in the midrange, cleaner note separation, a sound that cuts through drums and guitars rather than sitting warmly beneath them. For the music the Beatles were making, this turned out to be exactly right. Those melodic, inventive, harmonically sophisticated bass lines that gradually became McCartney’s signature needed to be heard, not felt. One of the things that bugged Paul the most about Beatles records was that his bass, he thought, was never loud enough. Paul began the Beatles years with the “home plate,” and also heavier felt picks, giving a softer, rounder attack when the song called for it. Later in his career he settled on heavy Fender 351-style picks for bass work, switching picks when he moved between guitar and bass onstage. He reportedly became so attached to the tactile feedback of a pick that on tour, when the nail on his picking finger wore down, his wife Nancy suggested he get a fake nail applied to maintain consistent feel. 💅 It’s unclear whether Paul really used pennies for picks, but such a thing isn’t totally unheard of—Queen guitarist Brian May uses sixpence coins as a his signature guitar pick—he enjoys the “chime” effect created by the serrated edge. A footnote: In 2019, London’s Daily Mirror newspaper published several photos of someone who looks very much like McCartney placing coins on a railroad track. However, Paul wasn’t interviewed for the story. The Tiny Plastic Thing That Changed Everything ✨ It would be easy to dismiss the guitar pick as the most boring component of the Beatles’ gear—the thing you think about after you’ve finished discussing the Rickenbacker 325, the Höfner violin bass, the Vox AC30s, and George Martin’s arrangements. But picks are the interface. They’re what actually touches the string. Today, picks that were actually used by the Beatles are highly prized by collectors. A pick John used for rehearsals at his Madison Square Garden performance in 1972 sold for $2,560 a few years ago through Julien’s Auctions. As the legend goes, Paul’s journey started with flattened pennies on the Liverpool tracks. It ended with a sound that redefined the bass forever. The distance between those two points is one of the great arcs of rock history—a transformation fueled by a simple piece of celluloid or felt that changed everything in ways no one saw coming. 🎸✨ Visit my Beatles Store: Get full access to Beatles Rewind at beatlesrewind.substack.com/subscribe

    10 min
  2. 2D AGO

    The Priceless Portrait John Lennon Tried to Destroy

    Picture this. It’s 1968. John Lennon is at Kenwood, his sprawling home on the St. George’s Hill estate in Weybridge, Surrey. He’s in the middle of one of the most turbulent periods of his life—his marriage to Cynthia is falling apart, Yoko has arrived, and the world he’d carefully built is coming undone around him. He’s burning it all down—the house, the marriage, the version of himself that had lived here—and anything connected to that old life has become impossible to look at. Including, apparently, a painting on the wall. That painting was a portrait of Lennon himself, made by his closest friend, Stuart Sutcliffe—dead at twenty-one and never gotten over. It had hung in the sunroom at Kenwood throughout the Cynthia years, a quiet reminder of the young man John had been before all of this. And now, in the middle of all that chaos and grief and upheaval, he’s standing there tearing it apart. Bernard Clark, the director of a local photo studio, happened to be at Kenwood that day delivering gear—a task he handled personally to spare the Beatles from being mobbed. Seeing Lennon in mid-tear, Clark stepped in with a beautifully simple request: "Can I have it?" Without a second thought, Lennon handed over the pieces. Bernard had no idea what he was walking out with. Two Boys from Liverpool 🎸 To understand why that painting matters, you have to go back about a decade—back to Liverpool College of Art, where John Lennon met Stuart Sutcliffe in 1957. The two were inseparable almost immediately. Beatles historian Mark Lewisohn put it simply: “They inspired each other and they laughed, drank, painted and read together.” They pushed each other in ways that only the best of friends can. Sutcliffe was, by many accounts, the more naturally gifted visual artist of the two. When Lennon was pulling together the band that would eventually become The Beatles, he wanted his best friend along for the ride. The fact that Stuart couldn’t really play bass was treated as a minor detail. Stu sold a painting, bought a guitar, and joined the band. 😄 Hamburg changed everything. The Beatles went there for their legendary residencies, and it was there that Sutcliffe met photographer Astrid Kirchherr, fell completely in love, and made a decision that felt inevitable: he left the band to study painting at the Hamburg College of Art under the legendary Eduardo Paolozzi. Lennon understood. The friendship didn’t just survive, it deepened. The portrait is believed to have been painted in 1961 or 1962, in the attic studio of the Kirchherr family home in Hamburg—the same house where the whole band was welcome, where Astrid fed them English breakfast and introduced them to ideas that were quietly reshaping who they were. Sutcliffe captured Lennon in a highly stylized head study—pen, ink, watercolor, and mixed media—abstract enough to be serious art, but specific enough that every single person who sees it says the same thing: that’s John Lennon. A simple “J” is inscribed to the left of the sitter’s neck. That’s the only signature the painting needs. Then, on April 10, 1962, Stuart Sutcliffe died of a brain hemorrhage. He was twenty-one years old. Lennon was devastated—the kind of grief he rarely let show, but that people close to him recognized immediately. He had lost his closest friend, his artistic conscience, the person who perhaps knew him better than anyone. On the Wall at Kenwood Lennon kept the portrait, of course. It hung in the sunroom at Kenwood — his favorite room in the house — for years. And here’s where the story gets genuinely thrilling for anyone who loves this kind of historical detective work. A photograph taken sometime between June and December 1967 shows John lying on a couch in that sunroom. And there, just above his head, on the wall behind the sofa, is a painting. A face. The Attic, the Box, and the Discovery After Bernard brought the torn pieces home and had the painting repaired, it had one more long chapter before the world got to see it. His wife, who had been close friends with Cynthia Lennon, was deeply unhappy about the way John and Cynthia’s marriage had ended. She didn’t want the reminder of that era on the wall. The painting was banished to the attic—like a portrait of Dorian Gray, sealed away and forgotten. In 2024, after Bernard and his wife passed away, their son, Stephen, was clearing the family estate when he opened a box and found the portrait. When the painting came up for auction, the photograph of John in his sunroom was used to authenticate the painting. John Silk of Ewbank’s Auctions performed a gloriously nerdy piece of art forensics. He took the image of the painting they’d been consigned for auction, “parallelogramtized” it (his word)—squished it, angled it, reduced the opacity, and overlaid it on the photograph. Perfect match. 🔍 The painting that Bernard Clark had walked out of Kenwood with in 1968 was the same one that had hung above John Lennon’s head the year before, while he was recording Sgt. Pepper and Magical Mystery Tour and living inside the most creative period of his life. A portrait of John, painted by the friend he’d lost, watching over him from the wall. The Sale 🏛️ When the portrait went to Ewbank’s Entertainment & Memorabilia, the pre-auction estimate was cautiously set at £3,000 to £5,000. It sold for £19,500 (about $26,500 in today’s U.S. dollars)—nearly four times the auction estimate—which surprised exactly no one who understood what the painting actually represented. This wasn’t just a piece of Beatles memorabilia. It was a painting made by a twenty-one-year-old artist for his best friend, kept by that friend for years after his death, nearly destroyed in a moment of grief and upheaval, saved by a simple act of kindness, hidden in a loft for decades, and finally brought back into the world. Every one of those layers is visible in the torn, reassembled surface of the thing itself. Stuart Sutcliffe left The Beatles to become the artist he believed he was meant to be. He never got the chance to find out how the story ended. But the portrait survived. And in the end, that feels like exactly the right outcome. 🎶 Visit my Beatles Store: Get full access to Beatles Rewind at beatlesrewind.substack.com/subscribe

    9 min
  3. 5D AGO

    🎸Day Tripper: The Riff That Ruled the World

    There’s a moment — you’ve heard it a thousand times — where a single guitar note bends upward out of silence, and before the second note even arrives, you already know exactly what song it is. That’s the power of the “Day Tripper” riff. Two bars. One chord. Infinite replay value. It’s the musical equivalent of a perfectly thrown punch — compact, precise, and impossible to shake once it lands. Released in December 1965 on the world’s first double A-side single (alongside “We Can Work It Out”), “Day Tripper” arrived at a pivotal moment. The band was under pressure to deliver a Christmas single and had just returned from an American tour soaked in Motown and Stax soul. That summer on the road changed everything about how they heard rhythm, groove, and the relationship between guitar and bass. The riff they came back with wasn’t just a song — it was a statement. 🎵 🕵️ Who Wrote It? Here’s where things get delightfully murky, because the Beatles being the Beatles, almost nothing about their creative process was ever simple or clean. John Lennon claimed the riff as his own, loudly and repeatedly. In a 1980 interview, he was characteristically blunt: “That’s mine. Including the lick, the guitar break and the whole bit.” Classic John — no ambiguity, no hedging, no room for argument. Paul McCartney, in his more diplomatic fashion, has said it was a collaboration but that John deserved the main credit, which in McCartney’s careful world of credit-sharing essentially means John wrote it. Who played it? John almost certainly didn’t play it on the record. The riff you hear — that grinding, insistent, perfectly executed two-bar figure running through the entire song — was almost certainly played by George Harrison, doubled by Paul on bass, with John likely handling rhythm guitar and the guitar solo. The irony isn’t lost on serious fans: Lennon came up with one of the most celebrated riffs in rock history and then handed it to his lead guitarist to actually perform. 🎸 George was playing a Gibson ES-345 and a 1963 Gretsch Tennessean on the session, and the tonal quality of the riff lines up far more naturally with those instruments than with John’s Rickenbacker 325. Paul, brilliantly, doubled the riff on his Rickenbacker bass — not on the open E string but up on the 7th fret of the A string — which gave the bottom end an unusual compression and punch that would directly influence the approach they’d later refine on “Paperback Writer.” The whole recording is a masterclass in how three musicians can lock onto a single idea and make it feel like one enormous instrument. 🥁 🎵 The Bobby Parker Connection No honest account of the “Day Tripper” riff can skip over Bobby Parker. Lennon himself acknowledged it — the riff drew heavily from Parker’s obscure 1961 track “Watch Your Step,” a grinding blues-soul number that made the rounds on American R&B radio and in the record collections of serious British musicians who were hunting for the authentic stuff. This wasn’t plagiarism. It was the Beatles doing what they had always done with surgical brilliance: absorbing the DNA of American music and reassembling it into something that felt entirely new. “Watch Your Step” was itself indebted to earlier blues traditions, and Lennon had already pulled from Parker once before when constructing the “I Feel Fine” riff in 1964. He knew exactly where he was fishing. Musicologist Walter Everett traces the “Day Tripper” riff even further, identifying it as a synthesis of ostinatos from multiple Motown recordings — the Temptations’ “My Girl,” Barrett Strong’s “Money (That’s What I Want),” Marvin Gaye’s “I’ll Be Doggone” — with a rockabilly undertow that recalls Roy Orbison’s “Oh, Pretty Woman.” There’s also a compelling theory that Lennon was directly motivated by competitive instinct toward the Rolling Stones: their massive 1965 hit “(I Can’t Get No) Satisfaction” had shown the world what a simple, repeated guitar figure could do to a song, and Lennon reportedly wanted to improve on it. If true, mission accomplished. 🏆 🔥 Is It One of the Greatest Guitar Riffs Ever Written? Let’s make the argument properly, because it deserves one. The case for “Day Tripper” sitting in the conversation with the all-time greats rests on several pillars. First, pure memorability — author John Kruth noted that the riff was something every young guitarist in the UK and the US simply had to learn in 1965, and that kind of mandatory cultural transmission is the ultimate measure of a riff’s power. Lenny Kaye, later of the Patti Smith Group, called it one of the era’s truly great riffs and pointed out that Beatles music was consistently harder to master than it looked — the Stones and the Yardbirds wrote riffs you could fake; the Beatles wrote riffs that punished imprecision. 🎯 Second, structural elegance. The “Day Tripper” riff is built on a single chord — E major — across two bars, which sounds almost absurdly simple until you actually play it and realize how many musicians would have cluttered it. The genius is in the note choices and the rhythmic placement, the way the riff creates momentum without ever resolving until it absolutely has to. It opens the song, forms the foundation of the verses, migrates through the chord changes (shifting to A, then B during the solo section), and closes the song. The whole thing is essentially the riff wearing different hats for three minutes. Most songs use riffs as decoration. “Day Tripper” uses it as architecture. 🏗️ Third, influence. The Total Guitar/Guitar World poll of the greatest riffs ever placed “Ticket to Ride” — another Beatles groove — at number 49, and “Day Tripper” perennially appears in these lists alongside the giants: Jimmy Page’s “Whole Lotta Love,” Keith Richards’ “Satisfaction,” Ritchie Blackmore’s “Smoke on the Water,” Tony Iommi’s “Iron Man.” These are the riffs that didn’t just accompany great songs — they became the reason those songs existed in the first place. “Day Tripper” belongs in that company. 🎸 The Brotherhood of the Great Riff To understand where “Day Tripper” sits historically, it helps to look at the company it keeps. Keith Richards and “(I Can’t Get No) Satisfaction” (1965) — Richards came up with the riff half-asleep in a hotel room, recorded it on a cassette before he fell back to sleep, and woke up not entirely sure he hadn’t dreamed it. Three fuzztone notes that became the most recognizable guitar sound of the decade. ⚡ Jimmy Page and “Whole Lotta Love” (1969) — Page constructed this on a houseboat on the Thames, drawing from Willie Dixon’s blues vocabulary and amplifying it into something that sounded like it was coming from a different planet. Total Guitar called it the definitive riff. 🚀 Tony Iommi and “Iron Man” / “Paranoid” (1970) — Iommi had lost the tips of two fingers in an industrial accident and learned to play with homemade prosthetics, which forced him to tune down and attack the strings differently, accidentally inventing the heavy metal guitar sound in the process. 🖤 Ritchie Blackmore and “Smoke on the Water” (1972) — The most widely played riff in history by sheer volume of beginners attacking it in guitar shops worldwide. Four notes in fourths, conceived while watching a casino burn in Montreux. Its power lies in its almost aggressive simplicity. 🔥 Jack White and “Seven Nation Army” (2003) — Three descending notes through an octave pedal that became a stadium chant heard at sporting events worldwide. Proof that great riffs weren’t a vintage phenomenon locked in the 60s and 70s — the right idea at the right moment still hits the same way. ⚡ What all these riffs share with “Day Tripper” is the quality that separates great riffs from merely good ones: they don’t just introduce a song — they make the song inevitable. You can’t imagine any of these recordings starting any other way. The riff isn’t a hook bolted onto the front — it IS the song, and everything else is built around it. 🎵 The Day Tripper Legacy The recording itself, completed in just three takes on October 16, 1965 — with Paul’s unusual high-register bass doubling, Ringo’s increasingly aggressive drumming building through the verses, and that deliberately mysterious guitar dropout near the end that George Martin apparently let stand as an intentional quirk — remains one of the most tightly constructed three minutes in rock history. 2:47 of pure economy, as Paul would later describe it. Nothing wasted. Nothing missing. The song’s subject matter — Lennon’s arch portrait of a “weekend hippie,” the day-tripper who wanted the experience of counterculture without the commitment, the dabbler who took the easy way out — gave the riff an edge that pure musicianship alone couldn’t supply. The riff doesn’t sound like an invitation. It sounds like an accusation. That tension between the grinding, relentless guitar figure and the slightly contemptuous lyric is what keeps “Day Tripper” feeling dangerous sixty years later when so many of its contemporaries feel merely nostalgic. 🎶 Whether it was John’s idea executed by George, or George’s instincts shaping John’s concept in real time — the answer, honestly, is probably both — “Day Tripper” gave the world a riff that young guitarists are still learning, still arguing about, and still unable to play just once. That’s the only definition of greatness that actually matters. 🌟 Visit my Beatles Store: Get full access to Beatles Rewind at beatlesrewind.substack.com/subscribe

    12 min
  4. 6D AGO

    More Than Gold: The Secret to the Lennon-McCartney Magic

    When John Lennon and Paul McCartney first met at a church fete in Woolton on July 6, 1957, neither could have predicted they were about to form what would become the most successful songwriting partnership in the history of recorded music. The Beatles would go on to sell over 600 million records worldwide, with John and Paul credited on approximately 180 songs between 1962 and 1970. But the numbers, as staggering as they are, tell only part of the story. What made this partnership truly extraordinary wasn’t just the quantity of hits they produced—it was the way their collaboration pushed both men to heights neither could have reached alone. 🎸 In the beginning, they wrote songs the old-fashioned way: sitting across from each other with acoustic guitars, working “eyeball to eyeball” as John later described it. He remembered the moment they got the chord that made “I Want to Hold Your Hand”—they were in Jane Asher’s house, downstairs in the cellar playing on the piano at the same time, both contributing in real-time to create something neither had walked in with. This was true collaboration in its purest form, where the line between “John’s contribution” and “Paul’s contribution” blurred into irrelevance. The song that emerged belonged to both of them equally. 💿 McCartney once said they never had a writing session that wasn’t successful during those early years, it always resulted in a song. That’s a remarkable claim, but it speaks to the chemistry they developed. They had made an agreement before the Beatles became famous that everything they wrote individually or together would be credited to both names—Lennon-McCartney. This decision would later cause some friction, but in those early days it reflected their genuine belief that they were a team, that their collaboration was integral to their identity as songwriters. 📝 What distinguished Lennon-McCartney from many other famous songwriting partnerships was that both men wrote both music and lyrics. Unlike George and Ira Gershwin, Rodgers and Hammerstein, or Elton John and Bernie Taupin—where one partner focused on music and the other on words—John and Paul were both complete songwriters. This meant they could challenge each other on every aspect of a song, pushing back on a weak lyric or suggesting a better chord change. As John’s first wife Cynthia Lennon observed, “John needed Paul’s persistence and attention-to-detail while Paul needed John’s anarchic, lateral thinking.” They complemented each other perfectly, one’s strength covering the other’s weakness. ⚖️ As their career progressed, their writing process evolved. By the mid-1960s, it became more common for one of them to write most of a song individually and then bring it to the other for refinement and input. This is where the real magic of their partnership became evident—not in the songs they wrote together from scratch, but in how they improved each other’s individual compositions through constructive criticism and creative additions. Paul wrote the melody for “In My Life,” a song that’s become intrinsically linked to John’s confessional lyrical style. Meanwhile, John later admitted he had a significant hand in creating “Eleanor Rigby,” which is typically credited solely to Paul. 🎵 The contributions each made to the other’s songs are legendary. When Paul brought in “Getting Better,” a song with its relentlessly optimistic chorus, John added the cynical counterpoint “It can’t get no worse,” grounding Paul’s sunny disposition with a dose of Lennon realism. For “A Day in the Life,” John had written the opening section and the “I’d love to turn you on” refrain, but the song lacked a middle section. Paul contributed the “Woke up, fell out of bed” bridge, which provided the perfect contrast to John’s dreamier verses. The result was a masterpiece that neither could have created alone—John’s surrealism and Paul’s mundane everyday imagery creating something greater than the sum of its parts. 🌟 Their healthy competition drove both men to continually raise their game. When John wrote “Strawberry Fields Forever,” Paul responded with “Penny Lane.” When Paul delivered “Yesterday,” John felt pressure to come up with something equally profound, eventually producing “In My Life.” This wasn’t destructive rivalry—it was the kind of competitive edge that elite athletes talk about, where having a worthy opponent makes you perform at your peak. Paul would later say that having John in the room kept him from being lazy, from settling for the easy lyric or the obvious melody. And John admitted that Paul’s meticulous attention to craft pushed him to be more disciplined, to not just rely on raw talent and inspiration. 🏆 Their producer, George Martin, observed this dynamic up close and understood its importance. He once said that while John and Paul were both extraordinary talents, what made them truly special was their willingness to accept criticism from each other. Most artists are protective of their work, defensive when someone suggests changes. But John and Paul had developed enough trust and mutual respect that they could say “that lyric isn’t working” or “that melody is boring” without the other taking offense. This created an environment where songs could be refined ruthlessly until they reached their potential. 🎹 Compare this to the partnership of Richard Rodgers and Oscar Hammerstein II, widely considered the greatest collaboration in American musical theater history. Rodgers composed the music while Hammerstein wrote lyrics and libretto—a clear division of labor that worked brilliantly for shows like Oklahoma!, South Pacific, and The Sound of Music. But their process was more sequential than collaborative: Hammerstein would write the lyrics first, then Rodgers would compose music to fit those words. When Rodgers had previously worked with Lorenz Hart, the process was reversed—Rodgers wrote music first, Hart added lyrics. These partnerships succeeded through complementary skills rather than overlapping ones. 🎭 The Gershwin brothers—George composing, Ira writing lyrics—created timeless standards like “I Got Rhythm” and “Embraceable You” through a similar division of labor. George died tragically young in 1937, and while Ira continued working with other composers, he never recaptured the magic of that fraternal partnership. Jerry Leiber and Mike Stoller, who wrote rock and roll classics like “Hound Dog” and “Jailhouse Rock,” also maintained clear roles—Leiber handled lyrics, Stoller focused on music. They met at 17 and worked together for decades, but their collaboration was built on specialization rather than the kind of all-encompassing partnership Lennon and McCartney developed. 🎼 What made Lennon-McCartney different—and arguably more dynamic—was that both could do everything. This meant genuine collaboration where they could meet each other on any level of the songwriting process. It also meant they could work independently when needed, which became increasingly important as their individual artistic visions diverged in the late 1960s. By the time of the White Album, most songs were essentially solo compositions with minimal input from the partner. Yet even then, the Lennon-McCartney credit remained, a testament to the foundation they’d built together. 📀 The contrast in their personalities fueled their creative chemistry. Paul was meticulous and organized, always carrying a notebook to jot down ideas in his neat handwriting. John was the opposite—scrambling to find scraps of paper to write unreadable notes whenever inspiration struck. Paul was diplomatic and smooth in communication; John was confrontational and provocative. Paul would work methodically through a song, refining it over time; John preferred to capture the initial burst of inspiration and move on. These differences could have been fatal to the partnership, but instead they created a creative tension that generated electricity. ⚡ The partnership began to fracture in the late 1960s for reasons that had as much to do with business and personal relationships as with creative differences. The death of manager Brian Epstein in 1967 removed a stabilizing force, and disagreements about how to manage the Beatles’ affairs created tensions that spilled into the studio. John’s relationship with Yoko and his desire to pursue more experimental, avant-garde work clashed with Paul’s more commercial instincts. By the time they recorded Abbey Road, they were barely functioning as a partnership, though that album’s medley showed what they could still achieve when they set ego aside. 💔 After the Beatles split in 1970, both men embarked on solo careers that would test the hypothesis of whether they were better together or apart. The results were... complicated. Paul formed Wings and enjoyed massive commercial success throughout the 1970s with hits like “Band on the Run,” “Live and Let It Die,” and “Silly Love Songs.” His melodic gifts and pop sensibility served him well, and Wings became one of the decade’s biggest acts. John, meanwhile, produced raw, confessional work like “Imagine” and “Jealous Guy” that showcased his lyrical depth and emotional vulnerability. Both proved they could succeed independently. 🎤 But neither ever quite recaptured the consistent brilliance of their Beatles output. Paul’s solo work, while commercially successful, was sometimes criticized for being too lightweight, too eager to please. Without John around to add edge and cynicism, Paul’s natural optimism occasionally tipped into saccharine territory. John’s solo work could be powerful and moving, but also self-indulgent and under-produced. They needed each other more than either wanted to admit. 💭 This is the paradox of

    13 min
  5. 6D AGO

    Paul McCartney Releases Soundtrack for "Man on the Run” Documentary

    Paul McCartney just announced a companion album for the upcoming documentary Man on the Run, set for release on February 27th on Amazon Prime Video. The album serves as a musical complement to director Morgan Neville’s movie documentary exploring McCartney’s creative rebirth and Wings’ remarkable trajectory through the 1970s following the Beatles’ dissolution. 🎸 The soundtrack offers what McCartney’s team describes as “a snapshot of Paul’s creativity in the 1970s in 12 songs,” drawing from the extensive Wings catalog and McCartney’s solo work from that transformative decade. However, Paul’s announcement leaves some ambiguity regarding exactly how much genuinely new material fans can expect versus remastered versions of familiar classics—a question that’s probably keeping McCartney obsessives up at night parsing every word of the press release. 📀 Based on the track listing (shown below) and promotional materials, the album appears to contain three previously unreleased recordings that constitute the “new” content: “Arrow Through Me (Rough Mix)” from the 1979 Back to the Egg album sessions, “Live and Let Die (Rockshow)” from the 1980 concert film, and “Gotta Sing Gotta Dance” from the 1973 television special “James Paul McCartney.” The remaining nine tracks appear to be remastered versions of established recordings spanning 2010 through 2018 remasters. So if you’re hoping for a vault-clearing treasure trove of unreleased Wings material, this might not be your moment—but those three tracks still promise something intriguing. 💿 Sneak peeks of two tracks—”Arrow Through Me (Rough Mix)” and “Live and Let Die (Rockshow)”—are now available on the Amazon Music streaming service, and those tunes are most intriguing offerings for devoted McCartney scholars. The rough mix provides insight into the creative process during the 1979 Back to the Egg sessions, a period when Wings was experimenting with new wave influences and expanding their sonic palette beyond the melodic rock that defined their mid-1970s peak. The Rockshow version of “Live and Let Die” captures Wings in full theatrical concert mode, performing the James Bond theme that became one of their signature live spectacles complete with pyrotechnics and dramatic staging—because if you’re going to perform a Bond theme, you might as well bring the explosions. 🎬 “Gotta Sing Gotta Dance,” the third previously unreleased track, originates from the 1973 ABC television special that represented McCartney’s ambitious attempt to showcase his versatility across multiple entertainment formats. Its inclusion suggests Neville’s documentary explores not just Wings’ musical evolution but McCartney’s broader creative ambitions during the decade when he deliberately sought to establish an identity independent of Beatles nostalgia—no small task when you’re the guy who wrote “Yesterday.” 📺 This essay continues below. Click on the title of this product to view on Amazon. As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases. Man On The Run Soundtrack (Amazon Exclusive) The album’s sequencing tells a deliberate narrative arc. Opening with “Silly Love Songs (Demo)” is a brilliant choice that acknowledges both the critical dismissal McCartney faced (accusations of writing lightweight pop rather than meaningful art) and his defiant response to those critics. The track listing then moves chronologically through his early solo work (”That Would Be Something”), the partnership with Linda that defined his post-Beatles personal and professional life (”Long Haired Lady,” “Too Many People”), Wings’ progressive development (”Big Barn Bed”), their commercial and critical peak (”Band on the Run”), and their unexpected late-decade successes including the massive UK hit “Mull of Kintyre” and the new wave-influenced “Coming Up.” 🎵 After the Beatles’ acrimonious breakup, conventional wisdom suggested the band members’ solo careers would pale in comparison to their collaborative work. McCartney’s determination to prove otherwise drove Wings’ evolution. Looking back on his body of work, there’s no denying McCartney achieved massive commercial success and, more importantly, artistic validation on his own terms—showing the world that yes, he could absolutely do it without the other three Beatles looking over his shoulder. 💭 What remains unclear from the announcement is whether additional unreleased material exists in Neville’s documentary that didn’t make the soundtrack album. Documentaries often feature rehearsal footage, alternate takes, and studio conversations that provide context for the finished recordings. If Man on the Run includes such material, fans may find themselves wishing for a more comprehensive archival release beyond this 12-track snapshot—maybe a deluxe box set with 47 discs and a USB drive shaped like a taxi? One can dream. 🎞️ The February 27th simultaneous release of documentary and soundtrack represents strategic cross-platform marketing, encouraging viewers to engage with McCartney’s 1970s catalog while watching Neville’s film chronicle that era’s creative battles and triumphs. For longtime McCartney devotees, the three previously unreleased tracks justify purchase despite the familiar remastered material. For newer fans discovering Wings through the documentary, the album serves as an expertly curated entry point into a catalog that remains somewhat overshadowed by Beatles mythology despite producing numerous classics that defined 1970s rock and pop. The question is whether these particular selections—however well-chosen—can fully capture the creative restlessness and remarkable productivity that characterized McCartney’s most underappreciated decade. ⚠️ ⁠Man on the Run - Music from the Motion Picture Soundtrack, Track listing: 1 Wings - Silly Love Songs (Demo)⁠2 Paul McCartney - That Would Be Something (2011 Remaster)⁠3 Paul and Linda McCartney - Long Haired Lady (2012 Remaster)⁠4 Paul and Linda McCartney - Too Many People (2012 Remaster)⁠5 Paul McCartney and Wings - Big Barn Bed (2018 Remaster)⁠6 Paul McCartney - Gotta Sing Gotta Dance⁠7 Wings - Live and Let Die (Rockshow)⁠8 Paul McCartney and Wings - Band on the Run (2010 Remaster)⁠9 Wings - Arrow Through Me (Rough Mix)⁠10 Wings - Mull of Kintyre (2016 Remaster)⁠11 Paul McCartney - Coming Up (2011 Remaster)⁠12 Paul McCartney and Wings - Let Me Roll It (2010 Remaster) Visit my Beatles Store: Get full access to Beatles Rewind at beatlesrewind.substack.com/subscribe

    11 min
  6. FEB 9

    The Beatles’ Bedroom Scoreboard: Who Was the Biggest Womanizer? 🎸

    The Beatles sang “All You Need Is Love,” but let’s be real: they also needed appointment secretaries, highly creative alibi generators, and a lifetime supply of tea to soothe their long-suffering partners. These four lads from Liverpool didn’t just conquer the music world; they treated romantic fidelity like a trendy guitar effect—fun to try, but ultimately something you could toggle off when the mood struck. 🕶️ Of course, it wasn’t unusual for 1960s rock stars to attract groupies, but the Beatles took it to a whole new level. It wasn’t exactly nonstop orgies—that word suggests an organized event. Hamburg was more of a chaotic, 24-hour blur of proximity. The Beatles lived in a tiny, windowless room behind a cinema screen, and living quarters became a rotating door of fans and local residents. Behind the mop-top charm and "yeah yeah yeah" innocence lay a reality of constant sexual opportunity that few men in history have experienced, and the Beatles took full advantage of it from Hamburg through their solo careers. The question isn’t whether the Beatles were world-class flirts—that’s just documented rock history. The real mystery is: who actually took home the “Womanizer” trophy? Is it the one who spent a year in bed for peace, or the “Quiet One” who was actually running a very busy schedule behind the scenes? The answer might surprise you. 💔 Hamburg: The “University of Sin” 🍺 The transformation began in Hamburg’s Reeperbahn district, where the Beatles performed marathon sets in clubs surrounded by sex workers, sailors, and a general atmosphere of moral flexibility. This wasn’t the sanitized Beatlemania to come—this was raw, dirty rock and roll in Germany’s red-light district. All four Beatles lost whatever innocence they’d brought from Liverpool during those residencies. Before the tailored suits, the Beatles were just four sweaty guys in leather jackets living in a tiny room behind a screen at the Bambi-Kino cinema. Their “education” in Germany’s red-light district involved mastering eight-hour sets and dodging the advances of local characters. John Lennon later joked that they learned more about life in those wild German nights than they did in any Liverpool classroom. It was basically a PhD program in “How to be a Rock Star,” with a heavy emphasis on the fringe benefits. John Lennon later described Hamburg as their sexual awakening. The band members were young, far from home, performing in front of women who were sexually available and interested. They learned that being in a band came with benefits their day jobs in Liverpool never offered. Pete Best, the drummer before Ringo, later claimed the Beatles had sex with numerous women during the Hamburg period, sometimes in the same room while others were performing or sleeping. This established a pattern of viewing women as conquests and treating fidelity as optional—a pattern that would persist throughout their careers. Beatlemania: A 24-Hour Buffet of Chaos ⚡ By 1964, the temptations didn’t just walk up to them; they literally broke down hotel room doors. Fans were known to hide in laundry baskets and luggage carts just to get a glimpse of their favorite lad. Paul McCartney and John were the primary targets, generating the loudest screams, but all four were essentially living in a state of permanent siege. Saying no would have required the discipline of a monk—and let’s face it, these guys were closer to mischievous choirboys. 🍭 Beatlemania and the Hotel Room Years (1963-1966) When Beatlemania exploded, the sexual opportunities escalated exponentially. Fans literally threw themselves at the band with such frequency that saying no became the exception rather than the rule. The Beatles’ road manager and confidantes have described hotel rooms filled with female fans who’d managed to get past security, backstage areas resembling harems, and a general atmosphere where sex was as readily available as room service. During their first visit to America in February 1964, several hookups began: * Geri Miller: A Peppermint Lounge dancer who dated Ringo. They met when the Beatles came to watch her dance troupe. She recalled Ringo asking her out even though she didn’t drink or smoke, and they arranged to meet after her 4am shift. * Jill Haworth: A film actress who dated Paul McCartney during this period. * Estelle Bennett: One of the Ronettes, who had a relationship with George Harrison that apparently predated this tour and was resumed during the visit. John was already married to Cynthia Powell by this point—they’d wed hastily in 1962 when she became pregnant with Julian. But marriage didn’t slow John’s extramarital activities. He had affairs throughout the Beatlemania years, though many remain unconfirmed. One rumored relationship was with British singer Alma Cogan, though this has never been definitively proven. The Hotel Room Setup. Philip Norman's authorized McCartney biography describes an "extraordinary setup" the Beatles had during tours that allowed them to "unwind after gigs." Beatles road managers Neil Aspinall and Mal Evans reportedly kept their rooms "full of junk and w****s and who-the-f**k-knows-what, and policemen with it," according to John Lennon's own description. The "Apple Scruffs." A dedicated group of female fans who waited outside Apple Corps and Abbey Road Studios. Key members included Margo Stevens, Jill Pritchard, Nancy Allen, Carol Bedford, and Wendy Sutcliffe. According to Carol Bedford's published account, George Harrison went home with her one night and confided that his marriage to Pattie Boyd was in trouble. George even wrote a tribute song called "Apple Scruffs" for them on his All Things Must Pass album. In Lennon’s 1970 interview with Jann Wenner for Rolling Stone magazine and later published in the book Lennon Remembers, the Beatles had a system during tours that emnabling them to “unwind after gigs.” Beatles road managers Neil Aspinall and Mal Evans reportedly kept their rooms “full of junk and w****s and who-the-f**k-knows-what, and policemen with it,” according to John Lennon’s own description. Journalist Larry Kane, who traveled with the Beatles on their 1964 and 1965 U.S. tours and maintained a lifelong friendship with Lennon, wrote about incidents where stage mothers would procure their daughters for the Beatles. Lennon described their tours as "Satyricon"—referring to Fellini's 1969 film full of orgies and wild sex—saying "Wherever we went, there was always a whole scene going. We had our four separate bedrooms... There's photographs of me crawling about in Amsterdam on my knees coming out of whorehouses." (Though these Amsterdam photographs have never surfaced publicly.) The Married Years: It’s... Complicated 💍 John Lennon: The Honest Rogue. John married Cynthia Powell in 1962, but he treated the marriage more like a secret club that he forgot to attend. He was notoriously jealous, despite being the one usually breaking the rules. The Beatles' womanizing had profound effects on their personal lives and relationships. Cynthia Lennon spent years feeling humiliated and abandoned, raising Julian largely alone while John pursued fame and other women. And John didn’t confine his womanizing to one-night-stands; while married to Cynthia, he had a long affair with Alma Cogan, a major British pop star of the 1950s. The two reportedly met in secret at Alma’s London apartment, a place John viewed as a refuge from the chaos of the band. She was nearly 10 years older than John, and they shared a secret, intense relationship that many insiders believe was one of the most significant of his life. Some biographers suggest John was genuinely enamored by her sophistication and success, and her sudden death in 1966 at only 34 devastated him. Cynthia had the last word, but she didn’t wallow in bitterness. In her 2005 memoir John, she painted a picture of a man who was deeply insecure and used womanizing as a way to "reassure himself". She noted that while the world saw a rock star, she saw a husband who was "hopeless at resisting temptation" once the fame became overwhelming. Her tone was less about anger and more about a profound, weary sadness at how the "Beatlemania" machine essentially ate her marriage. The children suffered too. Julian Lennon grew up with an absent, unfaithful father who showed more interest in his second son Sean. The emotional distance John maintained from Julian paralleled the emotional distance he maintained from Cynthia—both were casualties of his selfishness and inability to commit. John's relationship with Yoko Ono began while he was still married to Cynthia, with significant overlap that made the transition messy and public. However, John gets points for brutal honesty. He famously admitted, “I was a hitter and a womanizer,” which is a dark bit of self-reflection you didn’t often hear from 60s pop stars. His wild streak peaked during the infamous “Lost Weekend” in the 70s, where he and 22-year-old personal assistant May Pang cut a path through Los Angeles that would make a Viking blush. 👨‍👦 The period was known as John’s “Lost Weekend,” but the weekend stretched on for 18 months. Technically, John’s affair with May Pang wasn’t cheating. Yoko had orchestrated the relationship, and her logic was practical in a way only Yoko could be. “The affair was not something that was hurtful to me,” she recalled. “I needed a rest. I needed space.” But according to May, Yoko kept a close watch over the relationship, phoning ten to fifteen times daily to monitor the relationship In 1974, Yoko actually asked for a divorce, and John told May “I’ll be a free man in six months,” but Yoko changed her mind May claims that after John returned to Yoko in 1975, she and John continued having phone conversations and "sexual intimacies" for the next five years, with

    21 min
  7. FEB 8

    Censoring Sgt. Pepper: Who Didn’t Make the Cut?

    By the spring of 1967, the Beatles had grown tired of being “the four lads you’d take home to meet your mother.” They had stopped touring, started meditating, and were beginning to dress like they’d just looted a Victorian costume shop. When it came time to design the cover for Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band, they didn’t want a simple band photo; they wanted a funeral for their own past, attended by every hero, villain, and occultist who had ever rattled around in their collective subconscious. 🎩 The concept was simple: a crowd of people the Beatles admired (or loathed). But as the lists started coming in from John, Paul, and George, the lawyers at EMI got nervous. McCartney wanted high-brow literati and Hollywood starlets; George Harrison wanted a mountain of Indian gurus to prove his spiritual street-cred; and Lennon, ever the professional provocateur, wanted to see if he could sneak in history’s most famous dictator and the world’s most famous Christian. Both were vetoed by the record company, among others. 🚩 Pop artist Peter Blake and Jann Haworth were tasked with turning this chaotic wishlist into a life-sized collage of cardboard cutouts. It was a logistical nightmare involving telegrams sent to movie stars asking for permission to use their likenesses—most of whom said “yes.” But not everyone was a fan of the idea, leading to a frantic, last-minute game of musical chairs with history’s most famous faces. ✂️ So, behind the vibrant colors and the famous “Beatles” drum skin, a silent war of airbrushing was taking place. As the cameras prepared to click, the record label’s suits intervened, physically hiding the most controversial figures behind the band members or scrubbing them from the negatives entirely. It was the first time a rock album cover had been treated like a state secret, subject to censorship that would make a MI6 agent blush. 🕵️‍♂️ What remains is a vibrant lie—a masterpiece of editing that tells us as much about what the world wasn’t ready to see as what it was. From the “ghost” of Leo Gorcey to the coverup of Mahatma Gandhi, the album photo is a map of the era’s shifting taboos and the band’s refusal to play by the old rules of celebrity. 🎨 By looking at who they included—and who the censors forced them to remove—we see a band caught between their working-class Liverpool roots, their Hollywood dreams, and a new, radical desire to challenge every boundary in sight. The Ones Who Didn’t Make It Adolf Hitler Who: The dictator of Nazi Germany. Why: Believe it or not, John Lennon requested him. John’s goal was to be as provocative as possible, but the idea was immediately vetoed. A cardboard cutout of Hitler was actually made and brought to the studio—he is visible in several “behind the scenes” outtake photos—but he was carefully positioned so that he was completely obscured by the Beatles themselves in the final shot. Mahatma Gandhi Who: The leader of the Indian independence movement. Why: He was originally in the lineup (right next to Lewis Carroll). However, Sir Joseph Lockwood, the head of EMI, became terrified that including Gandhi would cause a riot in India or lead to a ban on the album in the Far East. To protect international sales, Gandhi was painted over with a palm tree at the last minute. Jesus Christ Who: The central figure of Christianity. Why: This was another provocative request from John Lennon. However, this was less than a year after John’s “more popular than Jesus” comment had caused Beatles records to be burned in the American South. The record label put their foot down immediately, fearing that putting Jesus on a pop cover would be the final nail in the band’s coffin in the United States. Leo Gorcey Who: One of the “Bowery Boys” comedy team. Why: He made the cut for the photo but was airbrushed out later. He was the only person who demanded a fee ($400) for using his likeness. In a legendary show of Beatles “frugality” (or perhaps just principle), they chose to erase him entirely rather than pay the fee. The “Unknown” Soldier Who: An anonymous soldier figure. Why: During the shoot, a waxwork of a soldier was placed near the back, but he was shifted around so much during the lighting setup that he effectively vanished behind other taller figures. He exists in the “set,” but he is a ghost on the finished cover. Sophia Loren Who: The iconic Italian actress. Why: A longtime favorite of the Beatles, she was originally requested and a cutout was prepared, but like Mae West, there were initial concerns about permissions. Unlike Mae West (who was persuaded by a personal letter from the band), Loren’s placement was eventually swapped out for other figures during the chaotic assembly of the set. The Ones Who Made It (Back Row) Sri Yukteswar Giri Who: A renowned Hindu guru and the author of The Holy Science. Why: He was one of the four Indian gurus suggested by George Harrison, reflecting George’s burgeoning obsession with Eastern philosophy and meditation. Aleister Crowley Who: A notorious English occultist, ceremonial magician, and novelist. Why: Suggested by John Lennon. John was fascinated by “outsider” figures and rebels, and Crowley’s “Do what thou wilt” philosophy appealed to the counter-culture spirit of 1967. Mae West Who: A legendary American actress and sex symbol of the 1930s. Why: Initially, she refused to appear, famously asking, “What would I be doing in a Lonely Hearts Club?” The Beatles wrote to her, and she changed her mind. Lenny Bruce Who: A provocative American stand-up comedian known for his trial regarding obscenity charges. Why: Bruce had died only a year earlier in 1966. The Beatles (especially John) admired his “truth-telling” comedy and his status as a free-speech martyr. Karlheinz Stockhausen Who: A German avant-garde composer. Why: Suggested by Paul McCartney. At the time, Paul was deeply into electronic “musique concrète,” which influenced the sound collage of “A Day in the Life.” W.C. Fields Who: An American comedian known for his “curmudgeonly” persona. Why: A group favorite. The Beatles loved his sharp, cynical wit, which matched the dry humor they often used in interviews. Jung-u-Kuo Who: A high-ranking officer in the Chinese military during the early 20th century. Why: He was another choice by Lennon, who was browsing through books of historical figures. His inclusion adds to the diverse, global “crowd” feeling of the cover. Edgar Allan Poe Who: The famous American writer and poet known for his macabre and mystery stories. Why: Suggested by John Lennon. The Beatles often cited Poe as an influence on their more surreal lyrics; John even mentioned him by name later that year in the song “I Am the Walrus.” Fred Astaire Who: The legendary American dancer, singer, and actor. Why: He was a personal favorite of the band. Astaire was reportedly “delighted” to be included on the cover, which wasn’t always the case with the Hollywood stars they asked. Richard Merkin Who: An American painter and illustrator. Why: Merkin was a friend of the cover’s designer, Peter Blake. His inclusion was a “nod” to the contemporary art scene that Blake was a part of in London during the mid-60s. The “Ghost” of Leo Gorcey Who: One of the “Bowery Boys” actors. Why: Gorcey was originally in the lineup, but he was the only person to demand a payment ($400) for the use of his likeness. The Beatles refused to pay, so he was airbrushed out, leaving a distinct, slightly discolored blue gap in the crowd next to Huntz Hall. Huntz Hall Who: Another member of the “Bowery Boys” comedy team. Why: Unlike his co-star Leo Gorcey, Hall was happy to appear for free. He remains on the cover, standing right at the edge of the gap where Gorcey used to be. Simon Rodia Who: The Italian-American artist who spent 33 years building the Watts Towers in Los Angeles. Why: He was a symbol of “outsider art” and individual perseverance—themes that resonated with the Beatles’ desire to break away from traditional pop music constraints. Bob Dylan Who: The folk-rock icon and a massive influence on the Beatles’ transition to “serious” songwriting. Why: By 1967, Dylan was a peer and a friend. His inclusion was mandatory; without Dylan’s influence, the Beatles likely wouldn’t have felt empowered to create an album as experimental as Sgt. Pepper. Aubrey Beardsley Who: A famous 19th-century illustrator known for his provocative, black-and-white ink drawings. Why: His “Art Nouveau” style was a major influence on the psychedelic aesthetic of the 1960s. Beardsley’s influence had already appeared on the Beatles’ previous album, Revolver, which featured Klaus Voormann’s Beardsley-inspired line art. Sir Robert Peel Who: A 19th-century British Prime Minister and the founder of the modern Metropolitan Police. Why: British police officers are still called “Bobbies” because of him. His inclusion was likely a playful, quintessential British reference—a “nod” to authority figureheads in a decidedly counter-culture collage. Aldous Huxley Who: The English author famous for the dystopian novel Brave New World and his essay The Doors of Perception. Why: The Doors of Perception, which detailed his experiences with mescaline, was “required reading” for the 1967 hippie movement. The band The Doors even took their name from his book. Dylan Thomas Who: A legendary Welsh poet known for his booming voice and poems like Do not go gentle into that good night. Why: All the Beatles were fans of his work, but Robert Zimmerman (Bob Dylan) famously took his stage name from this poet. By including both Dylans on the same row, the Beatles were acknowledging the lineage of their own inspirations. Terry Southern Who: An American satirical novelist and screenwriter who wrote Dr. Strangelove and Easy Rider. Why: He was a

    13 min
  8. FEB 6

    John and Paul Blocked George Harrison: It Backfired

    Here’s an uncomfortable truth about the Beatles: The greatest songwriting partnership in rock history actively conspired to keep their lead guitarist out of the creative process. John Lennon and Paul McCartney didn’t just dominate the band’s songwriting—they agreed to limit George Harrison’s contributions. And for years, it worked. George was the kid brother, the “young follower,” the talented guitarist who should stick to what he does best and leave the composing to the grown-ups. 🎸 As Paul recounted in the band’s 2000 autobiography, Anthology: “I remember walking up through Woolton... with John one morning... [asking] ‘Should we? Should three of us write, or would it be better just to keep it simple?’” They decided to keep the songwriting partnership between the two of them. Except George didn’t stay in his lane. He broke through the gatekeeping to release a massive triple solo album in late 1970, filled with masterpieces that had been shelved or ignored during the Beatles years. All Things Must Pass didn’t just top the charts—it became a cultural phenomenon, achieving a level of critical and commercial success that proved, once and for all, that George had been a giant in hiding all along. The story of how George went from dismissed sideman to vindicated genius is one of the most satisfying underdog tales in music history, and it starts with John Lennon fundamentally misunderstanding the “quiet” Beatle. The Young Follower Let’s set the scene: When George joined the Quarrymen in 1958, he was just 15 years old—a grammar school kid who looked up to John Lennon with absolute hero worship. John was already an art student, older, more experienced, more confident. Paul was John’s songwriting partner and intellectual equal. George? George was the guitarist they were lucky to have, but he wasn’t part of the creative brain trust. That hierarchy got established early and hardened into concrete over the years. 🎭 John admitted this dynamic years later with remarkable candor: “George’s relationship with me was one of young follower and older guy. He was like a disciple of mine when we started. I was already an art student when Paul and George were still in grammar school.” Translation: George was the kid, and kids didn’t get to write songs for the Beatles. John further acknowledged it was a “love/hate relationship” and that George bore “resentment toward me for being a daddy who left home.” George hadn’t been a songwriter... because John and Paul never let him be a songwriter. They controlled access to the recording studio, they decided which songs made the albums, and they had an actual gentleman’s agreement to keep George’s contributions to a minimum. 💔 So George was excluded because he lacked experience. But how do you gain experience when you’re systematically excluded? It’s the musical equivalent of “you can’t get a job without experience, but you can’t get experience without a job.” The First Attempts George’s first original Beatles song was “Don’t Bother Me,” which appeared on their second album, With the Beatles, in 1963. The story behind it is both mundane and revealing: George wrote it while sick and bored in a Bournemouth hotel room during a tour. He was literally killing time with a guitar, seeing if he could actually write a song. The result was... fine. Not great, not terrible—just fine. It’s a competent but unremarkable track that sounds exactly like what it was: a first attempt by someone teaching himself to write songs while his bandmates had years of practice. 🏨 Songwriting is a skill you develop through practice, something that most people struggle with during the first five or ten years. John and Paul had been writing together since they were teenagers, churning out dozens (maybe hundreds) of songs before the Beatles ever recorded their first album. George was starting from scratch in his early twenties, trying to learn in public while working alongside two of the most naturally gifted songwriters in rock history, and a pair of huge egos. George himself acknowledged the struggle: “The most difficult thing for me is following Paul’s and John’s songs. … They obviously got better and better, and that’s what I have to do.” George wasn’t demanding equal time. He was apologizing for even suggesting his songs might be worth recording. That’s what years of being shut out will do to you. 🎵 The Turning Point So when did John Lennon finally realize George Harrison was a serious songwriter? The answer: 1967’s Sgt. Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band. George contributed only one song to that groundbreaking album—”Within You Without You”—but it was a quantum leap forward in quality and ambition. Influenced by his time in India and his friendship with Ravi Shankar, George created something entirely unique: a philosophical meditation set to Indian classical music that somehow fit on an album full of psychedelic pop experiments. It wasn’t trying to be a Lennon song or a McCartney song. It was unmistakably, undeniably a George Harrison song. ✨ Years later, in 1980, shortly before his death, John finally gave George credit for ‘Within You Without You’—the credit he’d withheld: “One of George’s best songs. One of my favourites of his, too. He’s clear on that song. His mind and his music are clear. There is his innate talent; he brought that sound together.” That was the moment John could no longer deny what was becoming obvious to everyone else: George Harrison had found his voice, and it was spectacular. 🌅 But here’s the beautiful irony: John actually helped George become the songwriter who would eventually challenge the Lennon-McCartney monopoly. George credited John with giving him crucial advice that changed his entire approach: “John gave me a handy tip. He said, ‘Once you start to write a song, try to finish it straight away while you’re still in the same mood.’” That single piece of advice helped George complete “Something”—which John himself later called “the best song on Abbey Road“ and which Frank Sinatra declared “the greatest love song of the past 50 years.” 💕 The Floodgates Open By 1968-69, George was on an absolute tear. “While My Guitar Gently Weeps.” “Something.” “Here Comes the Sun.” These weren’t just good songs—they were great songs, songs that could stand alongside anything John or Paul had written. George had gone from writing one forgettable track per album to creating genuine classics that would define the Beatles’ legacy. But recognition came with a bitter edge. By 1969, during the contentious Let It Be sessions, the Beatles’ internal dynamics had become toxic. George briefly quit the band, frustrated by his continued second-class status. When the band tried to regroup and plan their future, John Lennon proposed something radical: each songwriter—John, Paul, and George—should get four songs per album, with two more slots available for Ringo if he wanted them. Equal space. Equal respect. Equal status. 🤝 Paul McCartney rejected the plan. Paul, who often positioned himself as George’s ally, said no. The Beatles never recorded another album together. The Ultimate Vindication Here’s where the story gets deliciously ironic: In 1970, the Beatles broke up. Each member went solo. And George—the dismissed kid brother, the songwriter who’d been rationed to one or two songs per album—released All Things Must Pass, a massive triple album that became a critical and commercial smash. The guy they’d kept in the shadows for a decade immediately proved he had a catalog’s worth of incredible songs that never got recorded because there wasn’t room on Beatles albums. The Lesson George’s exclusion might have made him better. Being shut out forced him to find his own voice instead of trying to write Lennon-McCartney pastiches. Being dismissed made him determined. Being the underdog made him hungry. When he finally got his moment in the spotlight, he was ready—and he had years of pent-up creativity to unleash. ⚡ The tragedy is that by the time John fully recognized George’s talent and tried to give him equal status in the band, it was too late. The Beatles were done. The “young follower” had become a master, but the teacher would never get to fully appreciate the student’s graduation. Visit my Beatles Store: Get full access to Beatles Rewind at beatlesrewind.substack.com/subscribe

    10 min

About

Beatles. All day, every day. Eight Days a Week !!! beatlesrewind.substack.com

You Might Also Like