The Lift

Editaudio

Welcome to The Lift, the show about leadership, growth, and getting what we want. On The Lift, we pull up to see the bigger picture from accomplished leaders who know how to get things done in a rapidly changing world. Host Ben Brooks dives deep into a relevant leadership topic each episode and connects the dots to leave you with powerful distinctions that you can use as a leader.

Episodes

  1. 17H AGO

    Send More Emails and Still Sign Off at 5 P.M.: Managing Expectations, Time, and Teams with Justin Kerr

    This week on The Lift, Ben is joined by Justin Kerr, also known as “the efficiency monster,” a former senior executive at brands like Levi’s, Uniqlo, Adidas, Old Navy, and Gap. Justin is the author of the “survival guide” How-To series (How to Cry at Work, How to Quit Your Job, How to Write an Email, and How to Be a Boss). Key takeaways:  Over-communication at work reduces anxiety and “status check” micromanagementClear expectations and deadlines are a core leadership skill, not just a nice-to-have, especially when managing up and across teamsTime management and early-morning routines create more freedom outside of workStructured one-on-ones and pre-read agendas make meetings more efficient, build trust with executives, and speed up decision-makingSmall process improvements (like better emails and links) compound into big efficiency gains, so you don’t have to “change the whole system” to make work easierRemote work has real limits for learning, feedback, and leadership development, and in-person connection still plays a crucial role in how teams grow In this episode of The Lift, Justin Kerr introduces us to his niche superpower: known as the “Efficiency Monster,” Justin is obsessed with making work simpler, faster, and less stressful through clear communication, sharp time management, and ruthless expectation-setting. Justin’s philosophy can be summed up in three words: send more emails. Not longer emails. Not more confusing emails. But more proactive, specific, expectation-setting messages that keep your boss, peers, and stakeholders fully informed so they never have to chase you for status. That one extra “FYI” or deadline reminder may take another 30 seconds in the moment, but it can save you hours of scrambling, anxiety, and follow-up meetings down the line. Justin explains why over-communication is not a weakness or a sign of insecurity. It’s actually a high-level leadership skill. If your boss is asking you for status, Justin says you’ve already failed. The anxiety in the system shows up as “just checking in” emails, Slack pings, and surprise questions in meetings. Sending more thoughtful updates up front fills the space before it floods with concerns. A big part of Kerr’s framework is his obsession with time. He’s a committed morning person and spent two decades in corporate roles without ever working past 5:00 p.m. – not because he was coasting, but because he built his days differently. He’d start extremely early, completing his deep work in those quiet morning hours before the offices started bustling. During that time, he’d send the emails, updates, and pre-reads that made the rest of the day run more smoothly. For Justin, time equals freedom. Working in corporate America wasn’t selling out; it was a way to fund his creative life, which included bands, record labels, zines, and later, books. All of that was only possible as long as he kept his workday tight and efficient. That meant a radical commitment to priorities. He argues that if you don’t know your top three priorities in life, it’s almost impossible to design your schedule in a way that makes sense. This conversation also dives into one of Justin’s favorite tools: the structured one-on-one meeting. In his view, you cannot be truly good at your job without a recurring 30-minute one-on-one with your manager. But it’s not enough to just “show up and chat.” He recommends: Sending a written agenda by 5:00 p.m. the day before, so your boss can pre-read and preparePrinting or bringing that agenda into the meeting, in priority order, to build momentum: quick wins first, harder asks laterTreating that time as your responsibility to manage, not just something the boss drives This approach works at every level, even for the C-suite. Executives, Justin notes, are often lonelier and more uncertain than people realize. They want clarity, confidence, and structure from their leaders, not more ambiguity. Justin breaks work down into two simple domains: people and process. People: relationships, trust, triggers, and individual differences. We all bring our family histories and emotional wiring to work; a manager’s tone or look might trigger old childhood patterns. Without self-awareness, it’s easy for simple feedback to spiral out of control.Process: the repeatable workflows – emails, forms, slides, approvals – that either make work easier or wildly inefficient. According to Justin, most people are waiting for some “grand organizational redesign” to fix broken processes. But real progress comes from small, local improvements: adding the right link to an email, creating a simple agenda template, or sending a pre-read to a difficult stakeholder so they can’t derail a meeting with “I’m hearing this for the first time.” Finally, Justin shares his hot take on the future of work: Remote work doesn’t fully work – at least not for everything. While digital tools can streamline process and documentation, he believes leadership, learning, and relationship-building still require in-person time. In his view, AI and automation should handle more of the process work. But the human side, including feedback, trust, creativity, and culture, happens best when people are actually together. If you’ve ever felt buried in Slack messages, frustrated by vague expectations, or stuck in a cycle of last-minute requests, this episode will give you practical and immediately usable tools to change the dynamic.  And yes, you may walk away sharing Justin’s belief that the secret to an easier work life might just be three deceptively simple words: send more emails. Links:  Justin KerrHow To Write The Perfect Email class (CreativeLive)Justin Kerr on Instagram (@mrcorpo) See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    41 min
  2. FEB 10

    Judgment at work: A framework for better leadership decisions with Sir Andrew Likierman

    This week on The Lift, Ben is joined by Sir Andrew Likierman, professor of Management Practice in Accounting at London Business School and the author of Judgement at Work: Making Better Choices.  Key takeaways:  Good judgment is a learnable leadership skill, not intuition or instinctApplying judgment principles requires context and flexibility, not rigid rule-followingAwareness of personal biases and emotions strengthens decision-makingIn the age of AI, judgment is a critical human advantage, helping leaders assess nuance, break patterns, and adapt when situations don’t fit the dataStrong leadership judgment depends on execution, not just analysis — a decision isn’t “good” if it can’t be carried out in the real world In today’s episode, Ben sits down with Professor Sir Andrew Likierman to unpack a deceptively simple idea: judgment isn’t a feeling. It’s a process. Andrew has spent decades studying what separates leaders who consistently make sound calls from those who get stuck in overconfidence, analysis paralysis, or “rule-following” that collapses the moment the context shifts. His core distinction lands fast: decision-making is an action – it’s something you do. But judgment is a capability – something you bring. We don’t usually praise someone for “good decision-making” as a personality trait; we say they have good judgment. That’s because judgment includes the human element: what you notice, the factors you weigh, who (and what) you trust, and how your beliefs and biases sneak into the room with you. To make judgment practical (and teachable), Andrew offers a six-part framework leaders can use no matter the situation, especially in moments when you’re tired, stressed, or under pressure to move fast. He breaks judgment down into components you can actually improve: Relevant knowledge and experience. What do you truly know that applies here – and what are you assuming?Awareness of context. Every decision happens inside a specific moment: politics, timing, incentives, constraints, hidden agendas.Trust. Are the people, data and inputs reliable? Are you over-trusting a “confident” source?Feelings, beliefs and biases. You’re not a machine. Your emotions and worldview shape what you see as “obvious.”How you make the choice. Slow down or speed up? Consider alternatives or commit? Who stress-tests the decision?Deliverability. The best call on paper is not “good judgment” if it can’t be executed in the real world. Throughout the conversation, Andrew makes a point to push back on rigid principles. Leaders often cling to rules (personal or organizational) as a shield, because saying “it was my judgment” can feel risky in bureaucratic or highly regulated environments. Andrew agrees that while blanket rules can be comforting, context is everything. Principles matter, but how you apply them in a given situation is judgment – mechanically applying a rule of thumb can be dangerous when the scenario doesn’t match the pattern. That’s where ethics enters the chat. Andrew frames ethics not as a compliance checkbox, but as part of how beliefs shape judgment in real life, especially in ambiguous environments where “normal” practices differ across cultures. It’s not just what you believe; it’s how you apply your ethical framework when the pressure is on. And consequently, there’s AI, the looming accelerant behind nearly every leadership conversation right now. Andrew’s take is bracing and oddly empowering: Yes, AI will dominate pattern recognition – the repeatable, rule-based, “if X then Y” stuff. But the differentiator for humans will be the next layer: deciding whether the current situation truly fits the pattern, noticing what’s different, and adapting accordingly. In other words, judgment is what keeps leaders valuable in an AI-shaped world. Finally, Andrew shares a personal example of poor judgment that’s painfully relatable: Not starting a risky project, but staying in it too long and ignoring what the evidence was telling him because sunk cost (and pride) can be louder than clarity. It’s a sharp reminder that judgment isn’t about always being right. It’s about improving your odds and being willing to update your course when reality changes. If you lead people, manage risk, build strategy, or simply want a clearer way to make hard calls, this episode gives you something rare: not what to decide, but how to think while deciding. Links:  Sir Andrew Likierman Judgement at Work: Making Better Decisions The Lift is hosted by Ben Brooks. Find out more about Ben Brooks and his company, PILOT, here. The show is made by editaudio.  Follow Ben on LinkedIn and Instagram. For even more fun, follow along on Ben’s adventures with his puppy, Jetson. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    39 min
  3. FEB 10

    Toxic leadership explained: What makes a bad boss with Mita Mallick

    This week on The Lift, Ben is joined by Mita Mallick, leadership strategist and the author of The Devil Emails at Midnight: What Good Leaders Can Learn From Bad Bosses (and also a self-proclaimed former bad boss).  Key takeaways:  Bad bosses are created, not born: Toxic leadership behaviors often emerge under stress, pressure, and unexamined power rather than from personality aloneManagers have an outsized impact on employee mental health, influencing wellbeing more than doctors or therapists and nearly as much as a spouse or partnerPoor management training fuels toxic leadership: many first-time managers are promoted for performance, not people-leadership skills, leading to micromanagement and fear-based controlDeveloping confidence and identity outside of work helps protect employees dealing with a toxic boss, by reducing burnout and restoring agency when leaving isn’t immediately possible Self-awareness and vulnerability are critical leadership skills Feedback, reflection, and accountability are essential to becoming a better boss According to this week’s guest, Mita Mallick, bad bosses aren’t born, they’re made. Mita brings a rare combination to the conversation: she’s lived the worst of it. She’s studied the patterns, and she’s also willing to say out loud what most leaders won’t – that she, herself, has been a bad boss  One of the most haunting examples from her career is about a boss she nicknamed “Medusa,” known for screaming, public humiliation, and unpredictable tantrums. Her point in sharing isn’t shock value; it’s the reality that this behavior often gets normalized as “just how they are,” especially when fear-driven leadership produces short-term results. But Mita makes the business case that too many companies avoid: when a boss behaves badly, teams lose clarity and momentum. People stop taking smart risks, communication gets distorted, and, eventually, performance suffers. Toxic leadership doesn’t just hurt feelings; it breaks productivity and execution. One of the most jaw-dropping moments in the conversation is the mental-health data Mita references. Research from UKG’s Workforce Institute showed that managers impact employees’ mental health (69%) more than doctors (51%) or therapists (41%), and about the same as a spouse/partner (69%). That statistic reframes “bad boss behavior” as more than an HR issue. It’s a leadership and wellbeing issue with real consequences, and it explains why so many people DM Mita long, painful stories asking how to survive a toxic manager. Then layer on a structural problem: Many organizations promote high performers into management without teaching them how to lead. “Congratulations, here’s a title and a team of 10. Now figure it out.” That “doing → directing” transition is where micromanagement, perfectionism, and fear-based leadership often begin. Ben asks the question everyone wonders: If bad bosses are the worst kept secret in a company, why are they still there? Mita is blunt: It’s often not HR’s call. HR may document patterns and advise accountability, but the decision to protect a high-performing toxic leader frequently sits with the CEO or business leadership, who can justify it with numbers, relationships, history, or convenience. The message to the organization becomes results at any cost, favoritism wins, and (thus) the culture is negotiable. But in today’s workplace, where employees can post, rate, leak, and speak, senior bad-boss behavior is increasingly public and reputationally expensive. This episode isn’t just for people enduring a nightmare manager; it’s also a mirror for leaders. Mita offers a practical self-check: Trust your internal moment of knowing. If you ended a Zoom and felt that post-meeting wince because you snapped at, dismissed or got sharp with someone, sit in the silence and name it. Repair starts with admitting it.Look for the signals you’re ignoring. People go quiet around you. You’re the last to know what’s happening. Exit interviews (when done well) leave breadcrumbs.Ask for feedback with structure, not vagueness. Instead of “What should I work on?” (which can feel unsafe in a power dynamic), try: “Here’s what I’m working on, can you tell me what you’ve noticed?” When it comes to escaping a bad boss, Mita knows not everyone has the privilege to resign on the spot. So she recommends a survival strategy that protects your future: Keep your resume ready (always).Start networking before you’re desperate.Identify internal transfer options when possible.Decide your expiration date (“I can do this for another 6 to 12 months.”)Rebuild confidence outside of work – volunteer, coach, return to a hobby, create something. Toxic bosses shrink your sense of self; your life outside work needs to expand it again. Poignantly, Mita shares how grief after losing her father intensified her “bad boss” tendencies and how vulnerability (not oversharing) can create context that reduces misinterpretation and increases humanity. The goal is not to excuse damage, it’s to stop repeating it. If you’ve ever wondered how bad bosses get made – or worried you might be on the path to becoming one – this conversation gives you language, tools and a framework to lead with more clarity, courage and care. Links:  Mita Mallick The Devil Emails at Midnight Managers Impact Our Mental Health More Than Doctors, Therapists — and Same as SpousesHogan Assessment  The Lift is hosted by Ben Brooks. Find out more about Ben Brooks and his company, PILOT, here. The show is made by editaudio.  Follow Ben on LinkedIn and Instagram. For even more fun, follow along on Ben’s adventures with his puppy, Jetson. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    37 min
  4. FEB 10

    Lead like a learner: Helen Tupper on “squiggly careers” and the power of vulnerability

    This week on The Lift, Ben is joined by Helen Tupper, the CEO and co-founder of Amazing If and the author of Squiggly Careers and Learn Like a Lobster.  Key takeaways:  Learning is a core leadership skill, not a side projectVulnerability accelerates learning and leadership growthPersonalized, “squiggly” career paths drive engagement and adaptabilityTurning off autopilot improves learning at work – small changes like reflection loops and varied routines increase learning agility without adding time“Mistake moments” – openly reviewing errors – are powerful learning toolsDiversifying how and where you learn leads to longer-lasting growth In this premiere episode of The Lift, Helen Tupper makes a bold case for modern leadership: learning isn’t a nice-to-have anymore. Learning is the job. In a world where roles, tools, and expectations evolve faster than most org charts, the leaders who thrive aren’t the ones who “already know.” They’re the ones who stay curious, adaptable, and willing to be a beginner, even (especially) when it feels uncomfortable. Helen opens with a line that frames the entire conversation: Vulnerability is a normal part of the learning process – it’s not something to fight against; it’s something to grow through. Her work challenges the idea that career progress should look like a straight climb upward. The “career ladder” model is limiting for individuals (because “up” isn’t everyone’s goal) and limiting for organizations (because it stalls talent mobility, cross-pollination, and resilience). Instead, Helen advocates for squiggly careers: development that can move sideways, diagonally, in loops, or into brand-new lanes. This is a career driven by learning, not just promotion. Senior leaders often feel anchored by responsibilities to teams, reputation, family, and the pressure to appear “certain.” But Helen says it’s more about age than career stage. People often become open to pivots during moments of change: restructures, new mandates, burnout, or opportunity windows. The question shouldn’t be, “What if I lose?” but rather, “What if I learn?” Helen introduces the earned dogmatism effect: When someone sees themselves as an expert, curiosity can quietly shut down. They begin to protect the identity of “knowing,” which makes learning feel like a threat. For senior leaders, this can be especially sticky because executive culture often rewards confidence and punishes uncertainty. But when leaders act like they don’t need to learn, teams learn less, too. The cutlure becomes one where success is aligned with certainty. That undermines psychological safety and makes it harder for anyone to ask for help, admit mistakes, or experiment. A major myth Helen dismantles is that learning must be time-consuming. Leaders often push learning to the bottom of the list because they picture courses, certifications, or big formal programs. Instead, Helen argues for “learning in the flow of work” by engaging in small practices with outsized payoff. One of her simplest tools is asking a series of questions that serves as a quick reflection loop after a meeting, conversation, or decision: “What? So what? Now what?” What happened / what did I notice?So what does it mean (patterns, feelings, implications)?Now what will I do differently? This kind of micro-reflection turns everyday work into a learning engine without adding hours to the week. Ben and Helen explore curiosity as “collecting and connecting dots.” Your brain will connect the dots naturally, but you have to collect them by varying inputs and breaking routine. Helen shares the “backwards bike” idea (a simple left/right reversal that forces your brain out of autopilot) as a metaphor for leadership learning: small rewires like shorter meetings, walk-and-talks, and different question prompts create conscious attention, which creates learning. And when the emotions show up – frustration, fear, failure – Helen normalizes them as part of the process, not proof you’re doing it wrong. Helen’s upcoming book Learn Like a Lobster uses the lobster as a powerful metaphor: To grow, a lobster must shed its shell, a process that takes energy and leaves it temporarily vulnerable before it grows back stronger. That’s the leadership invitation: If you want to keep growing, you can’t cling to the shell of “competence at all costs.” For perfectionists and high-achievers, Helen shares two practices that make learning safer and more consistent: “Mistake Moments”: Instead of rushing past errors, Helen’s team shares and unpacks them (what happened, why it happened, and what they’ll do differently). It releases shame, banks learning, and role models healthy vulnerability.Ask for feedback first: Feedback is less threatening when leaders initiate it. Helen uses “What worked well? Even better if…” because it keeps you in the driver’s seat and builds a habit of continuous improvement. Helen shares her own current “shell-shedding” experiment: evolving her podcast format in public by learning openly rather than staying comfortable on autopilot. If you’re a senior leader feeling pressure to have the answers, this episode offers a liberating alternative: lead like a learner, because your adaptability is now your advantage. Links:  Helen Tupper Amazing If Learn Like a LobsterThe Squiggly CareerAmy Edmondson on Psychological SafetyEmployee Coaching and Development for the Hybrid/Remote Workforce 3 ways to measure your adaptability - and how to improve it | Natalie FrattoBookTrustHarvard Business Review article on impact managers have Values InstituteHow to cage your confidence gremlins  The Lift is hosted by Ben Brooks. Find out more about Ben Brooks and his company, PILOT, here. The show is made by editaudio.  Follow Ben on LinkedIn and Instagram. For even more fun, follow along on Ben’s adventures with his puppy, Jetson. See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    38 min
5
out of 5
17 Ratings

About

Welcome to The Lift, the show about leadership, growth, and getting what we want. On The Lift, we pull up to see the bigger picture from accomplished leaders who know how to get things done in a rapidly changing world. Host Ben Brooks dives deep into a relevant leadership topic each episode and connects the dots to leave you with powerful distinctions that you can use as a leader.