Common Sense Sorcery Podcast

Common Sense
  • 5.0 (1)
  • Games
  • Updated Weekly

Zac and Phil explore Sorcery The Contested Realm in ways only they can.

  1. 5d ago

    Play Sorcery Online Is Changing How We Play Sorcery

    www.patreon.com/EternaldurdlesALKEM GEAR BAGS!https://www.alkemgear.com/?ref=qhbtohkfChannel Art Assets by: https://www.instagram.com/jonthetallone/ TCGPLAYER AFFILIATE LINK:https://partner.tcgplayer.com/OexAAnPlay Sorcery Online is quickly becoming a major hub for the Sorcery: Contested Realm community. But what makes it different from Tabletop Simulator, and why are so many players choosing it for their online games?In this episode of **Common Sense Sorcery**, I sit down with **Aadu, the creator of Play Sorcery Online**, for a guided tour of the platform. We explore the features that make it easier to play with friends, learn the game, review your matches, and understand the competitive metagame.We get hands-on with the interface, play a game, and explore some of the most exciting features—including game replays, card statistics, custom analytics, achievements, and Sorcerer Summit integration.### What we cover- How Play Sorcery Online started and why Aadu decided to build it- How it compares with Tabletop Simulator- Playing with friends, joining queues, and spectating live games- Replays that let you revisit decisions and explore alternative lines- Card data and win-rate analytics for understanding the metagame- Achievements, weekly bounties, and community-driven development- Why preserving the tabletop feel matters- What's next for online SorceryOne of the most exciting parts is the ability to revisit a game and examine individual decisions. For competitive players, that opens up new possibilities for testing decks, discussing difficult turns, and learning from matches.**Check out Play Sorcery Online and support Aadu's work:**- Play Sorcery Online: https://playsorceryonline.com/- Aadu's Ko-fi: https://ko-fi.com/playsorceryonline- PSO DISCORD: https://discord.gg/herpqN6njj- PSO YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/@playsorceryonlineHave you tried Play Sorcery Online yet? Let us know what features you find most useful—and what you'd like to see added next!Subscribe to Common Sense Sorcery for more Sorcery: Contested Realm discussion, gameplay, deckbuilding, and community interviews.https://bit.ly/MoxfieldSorceryRiverside Partner Link: https://riverside.sjv.io/KB0E07

  2. 6d ago

    Play Sorcery Online Is Changing How We Play Sorcery

    www.patreon.com/EternaldurdlesALKEM GEAR BAGS!https://www.alkemgear.com/?ref=qhbtohkfChannel Art Assets by: https://www.instagram.com/jonthetallone/ TCGPLAYER AFFILIATE LINK:https://partner.tcgplayer.com/OexAAnPlay Sorcery Online is quickly becoming a major hub for the Sorcery: Contested Realm community. But what makes it different from Tabletop Simulator, and why are so many players choosing it for their online games?In this episode of **Common Sense Sorcery**, I sit down with **Aadu, the creator of Play Sorcery Online**, for a guided tour of the platform. We explore the features that make it easier to play with friends, learn the game, review your matches, and understand the competitive metagame.We get hands-on with the interface, play a game, and explore some of the most exciting features—including game replays, card statistics, custom analytics, achievements, and Sorcerer Summit integration.### What we cover- How Play Sorcery Online started and why Aadu decided to build it- How it compares with Tabletop Simulator- Playing with friends, joining queues, and spectating live games- Replays that let you revisit decisions and explore alternative lines- Card data and win-rate analytics for understanding the metagame- Achievements, weekly bounties, and community-driven development- Why preserving the tabletop feel matters- What's next for online SorceryOne of the most exciting parts is the ability to revisit a game and examine individual decisions. For competitive players, that opens up new possibilities for testing decks, discussing difficult turns, and learning from matches.**Check out Play Sorcery Online and support Aadu's work:**- Play Sorcery Online: https://playsorceryonline.com/- Aadu's Ko-fi: https://ko-fi.com/playsorceryonline- PSO DISCORD: https://discord.gg/herpqN6njj- PSO YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/@playsorceryonlineHave you tried Play Sorcery Online yet? Let us know what features you find most useful—and what you'd like to see added next!Subscribe to Common Sense Sorcery for more Sorcery: Contested Realm discussion, gameplay, deckbuilding, and community interviews.https://bit.ly/MoxfieldSorceryRiverside Partner Link: https://riverside.sjv.io/KB0E07

  3. Oct 7

    I Stayed Up Until 1AM Brewing This Magician Deck

    Mock Court may have fundamentally changed how Sorcery: Contested Realm decks need to be built. In this late-night brewing session, Force of Phil breaks down the evolution of his Immortal Throne Magician deck and explains why Mock Court represents a new kind of “universal guardrail” for deck construction. The previous version of Magician leaned heavily on Frog synergies, Sunken Treasure, Deep Sea Mermaids, Plague of Frogs, 13 Treasures of Britain and other engines that could generate enormous amounts of card advantage. But Mock Court changes the equation. If a single turn-one card can make your ordinary minions effectively unplayable, Phil argues that the answer isn't necessarily finding a way to beat Mock Court — it's building your deck so that Mock Court doesn't punish you in the first place. That leads to a completely different Magician build. This version moves away from the Frog package and toward Fire/Earth, with a dense collection of card-draw engines, Cores, Wiccan Tools, Philosopher's Stone, Searing Truth, Morgana Le Fay, Demonic Contract, Blood Mana, Poison Nova and the Immortal Throne combo. We also get deep into: Why Mock Court is a “universal guardrail”Why the Frog version of Magician struggles against itSearing Truth as the replacement for Sunken TreasureWiccan Tools + Philosopher's StoneDemonic Contract and unique DemonsWhy Magician wants extremely dense card drawManaging the deck's inherent Site floodImmortal Throne scalingKythera Mechanism + Chaos WishHow Fields of Kamlin and Mirage help against aggroBuilding the Collection for Demonic ContractExample opening hands and mulligan decisionsWhy adhering to Mock Court may actually make Magician a better deckThis is still an early version of the list, but Phil is already seeing a lot to like. What do you think? Is Mock Court forcing Sorcery deckbuilding in a healthier direction, or is it simply shutting down too many strategies? 00:00 Mock Court Changes Magician02:52 The Frog Magician Build06:00 Why Mock Court Breaks the Old Deck10:30 The New Immortal Throne List16:00 Demonic Contract & Card Advantage21:00 Searing Truth Replaces Sunken Treasure25:00 Sites, Mirage & Fields of Kamlin29:55 Building the Collection36:50 Goldfishing & Mulligan Decisions43:30 Final Thoughts on Universal Guardrails

  4. Oct 6

    Can Magician Survive Mock Court? | Sorcery Deck Tech

    Mock Court may have fundamentally changed how Sorcery: Contested Realm decks need to be built. In this late-night brewing session, Force of Phil breaks down the evolution of his Immortal Throne Magician deck and explains why Mock Court represents a new kind of “universal guardrail” for deck construction. The previous version of Magician leaned heavily on Frog synergies, Sunken Treasure, Deep Sea Mermaids, Plague of Frogs, 13 Treasures of Britain and other engines that could generate enormous amounts of card advantage. But Mock Court changes the equation. If a single turn-one card can make your ordinary minions effectively unplayable, Phil argues that the answer isn't necessarily finding a way to beat Mock Court — it's building your deck so that Mock Court doesn't punish you in the first place. That leads to a completely different Magician build. This version moves away from the Frog package and toward Fire/Earth, with a dense collection of card-draw engines, Cores, Wiccan Tools, Philosopher's Stone, Searing Truth, Morgana Le Fay, Demonic Contract, Blood Mana, Poison Nova and the Immortal Throne combo. We also get deep into: Why Mock Court is a “universal guardrail”Why the Frog version of Magician struggles against itSearing Truth as the replacement for Sunken TreasureWiccan Tools + Philosopher's StoneDemonic Contract and unique DemonsWhy Magician wants extremely dense card drawManaging the deck's inherent Site floodImmortal Throne scalingKythera Mechanism + Chaos WishHow Fields of Kamlin and Mirage help against aggroBuilding the Collection for Demonic ContractExample opening hands and mulligan decisionsWhy adhering to Mock Court may actually make Magician a better deckThis is still an early version of the list, but Phil is already seeing a lot to like. What do you think? Is Mock Court forcing Sorcery deckbuilding in a healthier direction, or is it simply shutting down too many strategies? 00:00 Mock Court Changes Magician02:52 The Frog Magician Build06:00 Why Mock Court Breaks the Old Deck10:30 The New Immortal Throne List16:00 Demonic Contract & Card Advantage21:00 Searing Truth Replaces Sunken Treasure25:00 Sites, Mirage & Fields of Kamlin29:55 Building the Collection36:50 Goldfishing & Mulligan Decisions43:30 Final Thoughts on Universal Guardrails

  5. Sep 21

    Why Every Sorcery Deck Has to Respect Mock Court

    What exactly is a guardrail card, and what happens when one becomes universal? In this Sorcery: Contested Realm theory episode, Zac and Phil break down the concept of guardrail cards and why they believe Mock Court may be the first true universal guardrail in Sorcery. The distinction is important. Cards like Garden of Eden and Mismanaged Mortuary act as specific guardrails. Garden of Eden forces Sorcerer players to account for its effect, while Mismanaged Mortuary can force Archimago and other graveyard-focused decks to adapt. But neither card affects the entire card pool. Mock Court is different. Because it costs zero mana and taxes ordinary minions, the argument is that every deck playing ordinary cards has to account for the possibility of an opponent opening on Mock Court. On the play, that can potentially disrupt the early turns where ordinary minions are designed to be deployed. And that leads to the bigger deckbuilding question: If a card exists that can punish an entire category of cards, should that category still be part of your deckbuilding equation? We also get into: What makes a card a universal vs. specific guardrailWhy Court of Equity doesn't necessarily invalidate Elites and UniquesThe relationship between card rarity and power levelWhy Ordinary cards may be uniquely vulnerable to taxationTurn economy and why early-game disruption mattersWhy removing Mock Court from the metagame could eventually bring Ordinaries backThe idea of an oscillating metagameWhy Overflowing Court may not provide a complete answerHow Mock Court compares to cards like Tax Collector and WitchWhether the existence of Mock Court actually means players should stop playing Ordinaries altogetherPhil's central argument is that Mock Court is fundamentally different from a card that simply answers a strategy: its existence potentially changes what is considered reasonable to put into every deck in the first place. Is that a problem? Or is this exactly what a healthy metagame should look like? Let us know what you think. 00:00 — What Is a Guardrail Card?02:28 — Mock Court vs. Specific Guardrails05:59 — Why Rarity Matters08:18 — The Problem With Taxing Ordinary Minions10:58 — Turn Economy & Mock Court13:00 — Does Mock Court Make Ordinaries Unplayable?16:18 — Should Everyone Just Play Mock Court?19:06 — The Oscillating Metagame Problem21:53 — Can You Actually Answer Mock Court?25:56 — What Does This Mean for Sorcery Deckbuilding? ⏱️ Chapters

  6. Sep 20

    Why Every Sorcery Deck Has to Respect Mock Court

    What exactly is a guardrail card, and what happens when one becomes universal? In this Sorcery: Contested Realm theory episode, Zac and Phil break down the concept of guardrail cards and why they believe Mock Court may be the first true universal guardrail in Sorcery. The distinction is important. Cards like Garden of Eden and Mismanaged Mortuary act as specific guardrails. Garden of Eden forces Sorcerer players to account for its effect, while Mismanaged Mortuary can force Archimago and other graveyard-focused decks to adapt. But neither card affects the entire card pool. Mock Court is different. Because it costs zero mana and taxes ordinary minions, the argument is that every deck playing ordinary cards has to account for the possibility of an opponent opening on Mock Court. On the play, that can potentially disrupt the early turns where ordinary minions are designed to be deployed. And that leads to the bigger deckbuilding question: If a card exists that can punish an entire category of cards, should that category still be part of your deckbuilding equation? We also get into: What makes a card a universal vs. specific guardrailWhy Court of Equity doesn't necessarily invalidate Elites and UniquesThe relationship between card rarity and power levelWhy Ordinary cards may be uniquely vulnerable to taxationTurn economy and why early-game disruption mattersWhy removing Mock Court from the metagame could eventually bring Ordinaries backThe idea of an oscillating metagameWhy Overflowing Court may not provide a complete answerHow Mock Court compares to cards like Tax Collector and WitchWhether the existence of Mock Court actually means players should stop playing Ordinaries altogetherPhil's central argument is that Mock Court is fundamentally different from a card that simply answers a strategy: its existence potentially changes what is considered reasonable to put into every deck in the first place. Is that a problem? Or is this exactly what a healthy metagame should look like? Let us know what you think. 00:00 — What Is a Guardrail Card?02:28 — Mock Court vs. Specific Guardrails05:59 — Why Rarity Matters08:18 — The Problem With Taxing Ordinary Minions10:58 — Turn Economy & Mock Court13:00 — Does Mock Court Make Ordinaries Unplayable?16:18 — Should Everyone Just Play Mock Court?19:06 — The Oscillating Metagame Problem21:53 — Can You Actually Answer Mock Court?25:56 — What Does This Mean for Sorcery Deckbuilding? ⏱️ Chapters

  7. Sep 16

    I Went 5-2 at Grand Contest Baltimore With Enchantress

    I took Enchantress to Grand Contest Baltimore and finished 12th with a 5-2 record — and honestly, I think I left Top 8 on the table. This is a full breakdown of my Enchantress list, my tournament run, the matchups I faced, and the two mistakes that ultimately cost me my final two losses. This is the same “Dankest Enchantress” list that won the Cornerstone about a month earlier, built around a resilient midrange Enchantress shell with cards like Acid Rain, Black Plague, Thunderstorm, Wildfire, Poison Nova, Abaddon Succubus, Coinxie, Fate Changeling, Order of the Sacred Torque, and Abundance. I'll walk through every round: Necromancer — surviving a blisteringly fast openingWave Shaper — using Scatter and Riptide to fight the boardSorcerer — where one major board-state mistake cost me the gameImposter — another mistake involving Sphere of Animosity and Flame CollarSteam Sorcerer — a brutally close game where Garden of Eden saved meFlame Collar — another aggressive matchup that came down to the final turnArchimago — controlling the graveyard and eventually turning the cornerThe biggest lesson from the tournament wasn't that the deck needs a complete rebuild. It was that I need to play the deck better. I made two mistakes in my losses that I immediately knew I wanted to eliminate before Avatar of the Realm. I also talk about why I'm so high on this version of Enchantress, what I'd change going forward, and why I think a Top 8 is eventually coming. If you want to follow the Enchantress testing, theory, and tournament preparation, check out the Enchantress tier on Patreon. Can Enchantress make Top 8 at Avatar of the Realm?

  8. Sep 16

    I Went 5-2 at Grand Contest Baltimore With Enchantress

    I took Enchantress to Grand Contest Baltimore and finished 12th with a 5-2 record — and honestly, I think I left Top 8 on the table. This is a full breakdown of my Enchantress list, my tournament run, the matchups I faced, and the two mistakes that ultimately cost me my final two losses. This is the same “Dankest Enchantress” list that won the Cornerstone about a month earlier, built around a resilient midrange Enchantress shell with cards like Acid Rain, Black Plague, Thunderstorm, Wildfire, Poison Nova, Abaddon Succubus, Coinxie, Fate Changeling, Order of the Sacred Torque, and Abundance. I'll walk through every round: Necromancer — surviving a blisteringly fast openingWave Shaper — using Scatter and Riptide to fight the boardSorcerer — where one major board-state mistake cost me the gameImposter — another mistake involving Sphere of Animosity and Flame CollarSteam Sorcerer — a brutally close game where Garden of Eden saved meFlame Collar — another aggressive matchup that came down to the final turnArchimago — controlling the graveyard and eventually turning the cornerThe biggest lesson from the tournament wasn't that the deck needs a complete rebuild. It was that I need to play the deck better. I made two mistakes in my losses that I immediately knew I wanted to eliminate before Avatar of the Realm. I also talk about why I'm so high on this version of Enchantress, what I'd change going forward, and why I think a Top 8 is eventually coming. If you want to follow the Enchantress testing, theory, and tournament preparation, check out the Enchantress tier on Patreon. Can Enchantress make Top 8 at Avatar of the Realm?

See All (128)

About

Zac and Phil explore Sorcery The Contested Realm in ways only they can.

Information

You Might Also Like