Of Darkness & Light

Daphne

Writer, Meditation Instructor, Parent, and Free Thinker Sharing Her Gifts & Story www.ofdarknessandlight.net

  1. 18h ago

    Protect The Wild & Green | Paper One

    PWG-01: THE ECOLOGICAL COST OF USEFUL SERVICEThe scientific foundation for the entire Protect the Wild and Green research program THE CENTRAL LESSON An environmental improvement is not proven merely because something uses less energy, water, material, or produces less waste. We must establish that it delivers an equivalent useful service and that its overall environmental consequences are genuinely better. 1. WHAT PWG-01 ESTABLISHES PWG-01 develops a rigorous framework for evaluating environmental claims. It demonstrates how to distinguish: * Measured improvements: A technology demonstrably uses less of a particular resource. * Environmental tradeoffs: An improvement in one category may worsen another. * Defensible ecological benefits: Evidence supports an improvement under clearly defined conditions. * Unresolved comparisons: Available evidence cannot justify declaring a winner. It does not prove a universal environmental ranking or introduce a fundamentally new life-cycle assessment method. Its contribution is organizing established scientific methods into a transparent, reproducible standard for judging claims. 2. WHAT IT REVEALS ABOUT THE DIFFICULTY OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE The paper’s water-treatment investigation exposes a particularly important problem. Even with thousands of original inventory records, authenticated source data, and reproducible calculations, we encountered inconsistent measurement units, incomplete upstream supply chains, uncertain allocation assumptions, and environmental impacts that could not be fully characterized. We could reproduce calculations without necessarily being able to prove their environmental interpretation. That distinction is one of PWG-01’s most valuable findings. It demonstrates why scientific uncertainty is not simply a lack of effort or computational power. Sometimes the available evidence genuinely cannot distinguish competing environmental outcomes. 3. HOW IT SUPPORTS THE REMAINING 29 PAPERS PWG-01 becomes the program’s common scientific standard. Here is how it applies to each future research subject: Artificial Intelligence and ComputingCompare environmental burdens per equivalent useful computation or service, including electricity, water, hardware, and infrastructure. Plastics and RecyclingCompare equivalent packaging services while accounting for collection, processing, substitution, and material losses. Renewable EnergyExamine lifecycle burdens, reliability, storage, and equivalent delivered energy services. Agriculture and FoodCompare nutrition or agricultural services alongside land, water, biodiversity, and emissions. TransportationCompare equivalent mobility services, infrastructure, manufacturing, and operational impacts. Conservation and RestorationEvaluate measurable ecological outcomes, displacement effects, and long-term uncertainty. These applications will require subject-specific methods and evidence, but the underlying discipline remains consistent. 4. ITS GREATEST CONTRIBUTION TO THE SERIES PWG-01 gives the program a way to distinguish what we know, what we can calculate, what we can reasonably infer, and what remains unproven. That means subsequent papers do not need to reinvent their standards of evidence. They can begin with PWG-01’s framework, adapt it to their scientific questions, and concentrate on producing new findings. And importantly, a paper can still make a worthwhile scientific contribution even when its ultimate comparison remains unresolved, provided it establishes something reproducible, identifies the precise obstacles, and shows what evidence would resolve them. IN ESSENCE PWG-01 teaches the research program how to prove an environmental benefit, and, just as importantly, how to recognize when one has not yet been proven. DIVISION I — Foundations & Ecological Accounting PWG-01 — The Ecological Cost of Useful Service Establishes how environmental benefits must be evaluated against equivalent useful services, lifecycle burdens, tradeoffs, and uncertainty. Provides the scientific standard for the series. PWG-02 — The Atlas of Preventable Loss Maps resource waste across major economic and industrial systems, reconciling material flows to identify where preventable losses are greatest and most actionable. PWG-03 — The Conservation Deployment Test Develops a decision framework for determining whether environmental interventions offer credible ecological and economic benefits, accounting for uncertainty, rebound effects, safety, and unintended harm. DIVISION II — Homes & the Built Environment PWG-04 — The Water-Wasting Home Investigates household water losses, leakage, inefficient fixtures, and conservation opportunities, emphasizing measurable savings and low-material interventions. PWG-05 — Retrofit Without Regret Compares practical building improvements, repair-first strategies, weatherization, and energy-saving technologies across climates, lifetimes, and embodied environmental costs. PWG-06 — The Home as a Flexible Resource Examines how homes can intelligently shift energy demand, reduce grid stress, and support renewable electricity without sacrificing comfort, safety, or accessibility. DIVISION III — Phones & Electronic Design PWG-07 — The True Cost of Replacing a Smartphone Evaluates smartphone replacement, repair, longevity, software support, and manufacturing burdens to determine when continued use is environmentally preferable. PWG-08 — Robotic Repair Before Destruction Investigates robotic and modular systems for diagnosing, repairing, dismantling, and recovering electronics before valuable components are destroyed. PWG-09 — Electronics Designed for a Second Life Explores repairable, modular, and recoverable electronic design, integrating product longevity, circular materials, and producer responsibility. DIVISION IV — Waste Collection, Recycling & Landfills PWG-10 — The Recycling Yield Gap Traces recyclable materials from collection through sorting, contamination, processing, and final reuse to distinguish reported recycling from actual productive recovery. PWG-11 — Rebuilding the Recovery Plant Examines improvements to material recovery facilities through adaptive sorting, automation, contamination detection, and energy-efficient retrofits. PWG-12 — The Least-Waste Collection Network Models waste collection routes, schedules, vehicle systems, and access requirements to reduce transport burdens without compromising service. PWG-13 — The Landfill as Reactor and Hazard Investigates landfill methane, leachate, chemical exposure, long-term contamination, and monitoring systems for identifying and preventing ecological harm. PWG-14 — Should We Mine the Landfill? Evaluates whether selective landfill excavation and material recovery can outperform containment once safety, emissions, contamination, and ecological risks are included. DIVISION V — Plastics, Oceans & Wastewater PWG-15 — Plastic Production and Persistent Harm Examines plastic production, additives, degradation, exposure, and persistent pollution while testing whether proposed alternatives genuinely reduce harm. PWG-16 — Intercept Before the Ocean Investigates watershed plastic transport and upstream interception technologies designed to prevent marine pollution without harming wildlife or increasing flood risk. PWG-17 — Cleaning Seas Without Harming Seas Assesses marine debris retrieval, fishing-gear recovery, and ocean cleanup against vessel emissions, habitat disturbance, bycatch, and ecological benefit. PWG-18 — Wastewater Without Secondary Pollution Studies treatment of PFAS and other emerging contaminants, tracking pollutants into sludge, brines, residues, and destruction products to avoid shifting pollution elsewhere. DIVISION VI — Climate & Manufacturing PWG-19 — Climate Change: Attribution Without Spin Reconstructs the physical evidence for human-caused warming using observational datasets, radiative forcing, climate fingerprints, and transparent uncertainty analysis. PWG-20 — The Heat We Cannot Afford to Waste Investigates industrial waste heat, process electrification, thermal recovery, and practical energy efficiency within engineering and economic constraints. PWG-21 — Chemistry With Fewer Regrets Evaluates safer chemical and material substitutions across toxicity, exposure, performance, waste generation, and unintended cross-media environmental consequences. PWG-22 — A Factory That Wastes Less Models manufacturing improvements through circular feedstocks, defect prevention, predictive maintenance, process controls, and reduced material and energy losses. DIVISION VII — Food, Habitat & Environmental Justice PWG-23 — Food That Never Becomes Waste Investigates preventable food loss alongside nitrogen and phosphorus leakage, connecting food systems, nutrient cycling, recovery, and agricultural efficiency. PWG-24 — The Cost of Fragmenting the Living World Examines habitat fragmentation, landscape connectivity, biodiversity persistence, and restoration strategies using spatial ecological evidence. PWG-25 — Rivers and Wetlands as Infrastructure Explores how wetlands, riparian habitats, and watershed restoration can provide flood protection, water purification, biodiversity, and resilient natural infrastructure. PWG-26 — Building Without Endless Extraction Compares construction, building reuse, retrofitting, and material-efficient design to reduce virgin extraction while preserving safety and useful building lifetimes. PWG-27 — Who Bears the Residual Burden? Investigates how pollution, waste infrastructure, and environmental risks are distributed across communities, incorporating exposure, equity, and harm-transfer safeguards. DIVISION VIII — Mineral Circulation & Ecological Early Warning PWG-28 — The Mineral Loop: Extraction Avoided, Materials Secured Examines critical-mineral recovery, reuse, remanufacturing, recycling quality, and genuine displacement of environmentally

    Protect The Wild & Green | Paper One
  2. 2d ago

    PIXAR CRY INDEX: PERSONAL TOP 20

    PIXAR CRY INDEX: PERSONAL TOP 20October 20, 2026 THE FORMULA Cry Points = D × S × Q × [1 + 0.10 × (H − 3)] D = Duration of crying, in minutesS = Strength of crying, rated 1–5Q = Emotional quality of crying, rated 1–5H = Healing nature of crying, rated 1–5 Healing Modifier H = 1: ×0.80, Emotionally burdensomeH = 2: ×0.90, Painful or unresolvedH = 3: ×1.00, Neutral or mixedH = 4: ×1.10, Comforting or restorativeH = 5: ×1.20, Profoundly healing All scores represent personal, subjective experiences. The formula provides a consistent ranking method, not an objective scientific measurement of emotional responses. TOP 20 PIXAR CRY RANKINGS D = Minutes | S = Strength | Q = Quality | H = Healing | Modifier = Healing multiplier. Ties share the same rank. 20. Toy Story 2: 1.8 pointsD 1 · S 1 · Q 2 · H 2 · ×0.90 18. (tie) Onward: 2.0 pointsD 1 · S 1 · Q 2 · H 3 · ×1.00 18. (tie) Monsters University: 2.0 pointsD 1 · S 1 · Q 2 · H 3 · ×1.00 17. Incredibles 2: 2.2 pointsD 1 · S 1 · Q 2 · H 4 · ×1.10 16. Finding Nemo: 4.4 pointsD 1 · S 1 · Q 4 · H 4 · ×1.10 15. Finding Dory: 6.0 pointsD 1 · S 2 · Q 3 · H 3 · ×1.00 13. (tie) Turning Red: 6.6 pointsD 1 · S 2 · Q 3 · H 4 · ×1.10 13. (tie) Brave: 6.6 pointsD 1 · S 2 · Q 3 · H 4 · ×1.10 11. (tie) Elemental: 8.8 pointsD 1 · S 2 · Q 4 · H 4 · ×1.10 11. (tie) WALL-E: 8.8 pointsD 1 · S 2 · Q 4 · H 4 · ×1.10 9. (tie) Toy Story 3: 13.2 pointsD 1 · S 3 · Q 4 · H 4 · ×1.10 9. (tie) Monsters, Inc.: 13.2 pointsD 1 · S 3 · Q 4 · H 4 · ×1.10 8. Coco: 22.5 pointsD 1 · S 5 · Q 5 · H 2 · ×0.90 7. Lightyear: 32.0 pointsD 2 · S 4 · Q 4 · H 3 · ×1.00 5. (tie) Soul: 36.0 pointsD 2 · S 3 · Q 5 · H 5 · ×1.20 5. (tie) Cars 3: 36.0 pointsD 2 · S 3 · Q 5 · H 5 · ×1.20 4. Up: 48.0 pointsD 3 · S 5 · Q 4 · H 1 · ×0.80 3. Inside Out: 52.8 pointsD 3 · S 4 · Q 4 · H 4 · ×1.10 2. Ratatouille: 57.6 pointsD 3 · S 4 · Q 4 · H 5 · ×1.20 1. Luca: 90.0 pointsD 3 · S 5 · Q 5 · H 5 · ×1.20 THE TOTALS Total Crying Duration: 31 minutesTotal Cry Points: 450.5 WATCHED FILMS THAT PRODUCED NO TEARS Toy Story (1995): 0 pointsA Bug’s Life (1998): 0 pointsThe Incredibles (2004): 0 pointsCars (2006): 0 pointsCars 2 (2011): 0 points UNRANKED PIXAR FILMS: NOT YET WATCHED The Good Dinosaur (2015)Toy Story 4 (2019)Inside Out 2 (2024)Elio (2025)Hoppers (2026)Toy Story 5 (2026) These five films are excluded from the rankings because I have not watched them. They have not received scores, and their absence does not indicate a negative judgment of their emotional quality or storytelling. An unwatched film is UNRANKED, not a zero-point film. FINAL SURVEY ACCOUNTING 20 films produced tears and received positive scores.5 films were watched without crying and scored zero.6 films remain unwatched and unranked. 31 Pixar feature films accounted for. All 20 positive scores have been independently recalculated and verified against their component ratings. Get full access to Of Darkness & Light at www.ofdarknessandlight.net/subscribe

  3. 6d ago

    On Completing My Full “Devil’s Arc”

    I have long term spiting to complete and predestined smote to throw by fire, all with a smile. Let me tell you about it. My family deserves it. And I deserve your help. Funny story. I laid down for a few hours of sleep last night before my early morning 1:20-11:50AM shift on Friday morning and had a fire quartz crystal in my hand. I do that sometimes, using the crystal as an intention holder of sending healing energy to people for their highest good. In my dream I literally called out a person’s name and felt a full body, highest-energy surge that was legitimately scary to me. Then, there was a second person called out by intention and another, less powerful wave. No spoilers. I’ve had that happen a couple times now. When I woke up this song—of all songs—was stuck in my head. Who let these people write and perform this? The lyrics are terrifying outside of my own metaphorical interpretation. If someone out there felt particularly cleared of distortion late last night… you’re welcome…? Possum Kingdom Regarding the greatness that is my filmmaking capabilities, I recommend you proceed to the page for STONE. It was my swansong of trying to make film as a boy-lie. It’s an ode to bad action films of the 80’s and 90’s. I tried to imagine what a Canon Film would be like if directed by a twelve-year-old Michael Mann. Mentioned Video of My Gender Journey Get full access to Of Darkness & Light at www.ofdarknessandlight.net/subscribe

    On Completing My Full “Devil’s Arc”
  4. 6d ago

    Why I Dislike Psychiatry and None of My Former Friends or Family Will Help Me

    Please remember. I have a genuine legal case that probably needs pruning and focus but could literally get me a settlement with the right law team that would offer me fair and deserved restorative justice. Also, I may be the one person to have done the most significant discovery of time in the history of humanity. I started emailing scientists in fields related to my synthesis and the documents are getting downloaded. One - Physical TimeWhat time is in physics, how we measure it, and what remains unexplained.Two - Time Throws FireHow energy and physical change create, preserve, and destroy records of the past.Three - Reconstructing the PastHow we recover history from physical evidence and the limits of what we can know.Four - Human Temporal ArchitectureHow the brain, memory, and prediction shape our perception and experience of time.Five - The Cosmological ArrowWhy the universe has an apparent direction through time and what we can determine about its origin. My plea for restorative justice:This was my last outreach email attempt to legal groups. Attached, just in case it might be passed along in some direction known by anyone.Greetings,My name is Daphne Garrido. I am a transgender woman in Washington State recovering from a substance-related psychotic disorder. I am looking for an attorney willing to evaluate whether what happened to me raises disability or civil-rights claims, particularly under the ADA, Section 504, Washington law, or Olmstead’s community-integration protections.Before this happened, I was an Equipment Manager for Compass Group on Microsoft’s campus, earning approximately $93,000 a year.In late 2024, after overusing blue lotus flower, I entered a prolonged psychosis. I was diagnosed with bipolar disorder at Connections Kirkland and referred to Mindful Therapy Group, but my condition was misunderstood and I continued without the diagnosis or support I actually needed.By October 2025, I was deteriorating badly enough that I voluntarily gave up custody of my daughter to seek help. The following month, an old friend and social worker—someone I had been frantically contacting for help while psychotic—sought a protective order against me. I spiraled further and eventually left my job because I knew I needed treatment.I initially received unemployment benefits, which barely covered rent and food. I could not afford private insurance and could not find a workable path to psychiatric diagnosis and treatment. At the same time, I encountered social-service systems that required documentation of a disability I could not obtain without access to care. I was severely ill, visibly unraveling online, and repeatedly asking people and systems around me for help.I later received another protective order from a former high-school acquaintance in Wisconsin whom I had also repeatedly contacted while psychotic and seeking help.My former employer then challenged my unemployment benefits. Without an adequate diagnosis documenting what was happening to me, my benefits were revoked, my appeal was unsuccessful, and I was ordered to repay more than $9,000.Without that income, I became homeless in April 2026.After moving through crisis centers and shelters, I eventually reached a tiny-home village. Ironically, becoming homeless and losing my income finally made me eligible for Washington Apple Health/Medicaid and gave me access to the psychiatric care I had been trying to obtain. Harborview has now formally diagnosed my psychosis and considers me to be in recovery.The consequences have been enormous. I remain homeless. I have not seen my daughter since January 2026. Divorce proceedings occurred without my participation, and the resulting orders require supervised visitation that I cannot afford. I also still face the $9,000+ unemployment repayment demand.There is a transgender discrimination component as well. During my illness, people close to me said that I had caused or deserved my condition because I underwent hormone replacement therapy. I believe disability and transgender status affected how I was perceived and treated, including within my family, while I was severely impaired and trying to get help.I also have an unusually extensive contemporaneous record. Beginning in December 2025, I video-journaled nearly every day and published much of it at ofdarknessandlight.net. The recordings document my mental state, deterioration, repeated efforts to obtain help, and many of the events described above. I also have medical records, unemployment and appeal records, employment information, court and protective-order records, and homelessness documentation.I understand that suffering serious harm does not necessarily mean there is a viable legal claim. What troubles me most is the systemic sequence: I was too ill to function, could not access adequate psychiatric care or obtain the diagnosis needed to establish my disability, lost the income keeping me housed, became homeless, and only then became eligible for the health coverage that finally allowed me to receive diagnosis and treatment.I am currently without income and cannot retain counsel on an hourly basis. I am seeking pro bono, contingency, statutory-fee, public-interest, or other appropriate representation. I would be deeply grateful if you could evaluate whether these circumstances present viable disability, civil-rights, community-integration, or related claims. If this is outside your practice, even a referral to someone better positioned to help would mean a great deal.Thank you for reading this and considering my situation.Sincerely,Daphne Garrido Get full access to Of Darkness & Light at www.ofdarknessandlight.net/subscribe

  5. Oct 16

    Time Is Bigger Than Us: From the Cosmos to the Human Experience of Time

    You can read about my next research project here: Protect the Wild and Green-ˋˏ ༻❁✿❀༺ ˎˊ- The Human Temporal Architecture Wiki The Preprints on Zenodo: One - Physical TimeWhat time is in physics, how we measure it, and what remains unexplained. Two - Time Throws FireHow energy and physical change create, preserve, and destroy records of the past. Three - Reconstructing the PastHow we recover history from physical evidence and the limits of what we can know. Four - Human Temporal ArchitectureHow the brain, memory, and prediction shape our perception and experience of time. Five - The Cosmological ArrowWhy the universe has an apparent direction through time and what we can determine about its origin. What This Research Contributes A plain-language introduction to the Human Temporal Architecture series What is time? We often ask this as though there must be one answer. But consider what the question might mean. We might be asking why a clock ticks, why a broken glass does not spontaneously repair itself, why evidence of yesterday survives, why an hour of waiting feels longer than an hour with friends, or why the universe has a direction we call the future. These are not the same question. A good answer to one cannot simply be carried over to the others. This is where my five-paper research series, Human Temporal Architecture, begins. Its central contribution is a way of investigating the connections between these questions without confusing them. The project moves from the physical structure of time, to the creation and survival of records, to the reconstruction of the past, to human memory and experience, and finally to the cosmological origin of time’s apparent direction. The ambition is broad, but the claims are deliberately bounded. I am not announcing a newly discovered force, a proof of what happened before the Big Bang, or a solution to consciousness. Time’s direction, the relationship between memory and entropy, and subjective time have been studied for many decades. Other researchers have also brought physics and neuroscience into conversation. The distinctive contribution here is a connected framework with explicit tests for where one explanation ends and another begins, together with mathematical examples showing why several tempting shortcuts fail. I cannot responsibly claim that every part is unprecedented in the history of science. The first achievement is to separate things that sound alike but are physically different. The first paper, Physical Time, asks what we can actually recover from clocks, causal relationships, geometry, and physical laws. Knowing that one event can influence another is not automatically the same as knowing the elapsed time between them. A clock measures duration in a particular physical setting; it does not single-handedly explain why the universe has temporal structure. Likewise, being able to distinguish two directions does not necessarily tell us why one is physically favored. The paper turns these distinctions into a practical question: what information do we start with, what conclusion does it justify, and what assumptions are still missing? The second achievement is a more precise account of how the universe leaves evidence behind. Time Throws Fire examines the physical work needed to create and preserve a record. A star produces light, an event leaves a trace, and a living organism stores information. These processes can make the past accessible, but energy use, irreversibility, and useful memory are not interchangeable. The paper develops examples in which a reversible operation writes a record because a prepared memory is available; it also shows how strong evidence that a process has a direction can coexist with poor information about its earlier details. A particularly revealing result is that many perfect copies of a historical record need not reveal anything about the deeper origin from which that history arose. More copies do not create missing information. The third achievement is to make the limits of knowing the past explicit. Reconstructing the Past treats history as a scientific investigation rather than a story filled in after the fact. Suppose two different events leave exactly the same available evidence. No amount of clever analysis of that evidence alone can tell us which event occurred. A new, genuinely informative observation might separate them; repeatedly processing the same data cannot. The paper makes this idea mathematically precise and proposes a kind of reconstruction certificate: a clear statement of what was inferred, which traces supported it, which alternatives remain, and what new measurement could make the conclusion stronger. That is useful far beyond cosmology—in any science that works backward from incomplete evidence. The fourth achievement is to connect physical records with human temporal judgment without pretending they are identical. Human Temporal Architecture brings together neural activity, bodily state, event boundaries, memory, prediction, and action. It challenges the simple picture of a single clock inside the head. When we remember an afternoon, the brain may draw on how many changes occurred, where events began and ended, what surprised us, and what is available when we try to remember. Our judgment about duration can therefore differ from the interval a clock measured. The paper proposes ways to test these competing explanations, and it keeps an essential question open: explaining a person’s temporal reports is not yet the same as explaining why the passage of time feels like something. The fifth achievement is a disciplined account of what the universe’s arrow does—and does not—tell us about its origin. The Cosmological Arrow compares seven broad families of cosmological explanations. They create twenty-one possible pairwise comparisons. Under the paper’s deliberately strict standards, none currently establishes a reliable, source-neutral choice of one ultimate origin. Two comparisons have specific forms of observational ambiguity; thirteen lack a justified common basis for ranking the alternatives; six depend on missing physical ingredients. This is a finding about the limits of the declared comparison framework, not proof that all origin theories are equally likely or that the answer will always be unknowable. It identifies what additional evidence or physics would be needed to make progress. There is a common thread through all five papers: we must not credit an explanation with information it never supplied. A measured clock rate does not automatically explain the origin of time. A photograph does not prove every detail of the event outside its frame. A collection of copies does not replace a missing original. A brain signal correlated with a time judgment does not, by itself, explain conscious experience. And a universe full of traces of its history does not necessarily reveal why that history had its particular beginning. This is why some of the series’ most significant results are carefully constructed negative results. In science, showing that a plausible inference fails can be as useful as showing that one succeeds. It prevents us from calling a guess a discovery. It tells an experimenter what measurement would matter. It points to the exact gap between a convincing story and an established explanation. The series also produces positive tools: a step-by-step approach to testing claims about physical time; a framework for tracking the creation, survival, and accessibility of records; criteria for deciding when the past is reconstructible; experimental designs for distinguishing different sources of human time judgment; and a structured map of cosmological origin questions. Some individual mathematical ingredients are inherited from established science. Their particular assembly, applications, and model-dependent counterexamples are contributions offered for scrutiny—not a declaration of universal priority. What, then, has this research accomplished? It has made a large, often confusing question more answerable. Rather than insisting that time is entropy, or clocks, or memory, or consciousness, it shows how each belongs to a different part of a connected problem. The aim is not to turn uncertainty into certainty by force. It is to find out exactly where certainty is justified, where it is not, and what could change that judgment. That may sound less dramatic than claiming to have solved time. I believe it is more useful. If we want to know what time is, we first need to understand what each kind of evidence actually tells us—and how the physical universe’s history becomes something a human mind can know. The Universe Has Time. We Have an Experience of It. What the Human Temporal Architecture series tells us about clocks, history, memory, and the future Imagine two people spending the same ten minutes in very different ways. One is waiting anxiously for a telephone call. The other is absorbed in a conversation with someone they love. The wall clock measures ten minutes in both cases, yet the two intervals may feel nothing alike. Neither person has changed the time measured by the clock. Something different has changed: the way a living mind attends to events, gathers information, and later remembers what happened. That everyday contrast opens onto a much larger question. If time can feel so different from the way it is measured, what is time in the universe itself? And how does a universe of matter, energy, and physical laws give rise to creatures who remember yesterday, anticipate tomorrow, and experience something called now? The five papers of Human Temporal Architecture offer a way to approach these questions without treating physical time and human time as either identical or completely unrelated. Start with the universe, before anyone is there to watch it. Stars form, light travels, particles interact, and gravitational fields affect how clocks measure duration.

    Time Is Bigger Than Us: From the Cosmos to the Human Experience of Time
  6. Oct 15

    Garnishments, Setbacks, and a Health Issue

    I’ll be okay. It felt good to get this out. If you know you shouldn’t be watching or listening: DON’T you can reach me at dontmesswiththetree@gmail.com if you want to help As a reminder, for the financially capable, I have a legal case that is a shoe-in settlement with the right law team in terms of disability/trans rights that I cannot find a pro-bono lawyer for. I would obviously make that worth it to anyone. This is my best email about it yet: Greetings,My name is Daphne Garrido. I am a transgender woman in Washington State recovering from a substance-related psychotic disorder. I am looking for an attorney willing to evaluate whether what happened to me raises disability or civil-rights claims, particularly under the ADA, Section 504, Washington law, or Olmstead’s community-integration protections.Before this happened, I was an Equipment Manager for Compass Group on Microsoft’s campus, earning approximately $93,000 a year.In late 2024, after overusing blue lotus flower, I entered a prolonged psychosis. I was diagnosed with bipolar disorder at Connections Kirkland and referred to Mindful Therapy Group, but my condition was misunderstood and I continued without the diagnosis or support I actually needed.By October 2025, I was deteriorating badly enough that I voluntarily gave up custody of my daughter to seek help. The following month, an old friend and social worker—someone I had been frantically contacting for help while psychotic—sought a protective order against me. I spiraled further and eventually left my job because I knew I needed treatment.I initially received unemployment benefits, which barely covered rent and food. I could not afford private insurance and could not find a workable path to psychiatric diagnosis and treatment. At the same time, I encountered social-service systems that required documentation of a disability I could not obtain without access to care. I was severely ill, visibly unraveling online, and repeatedly asking people and systems around me for help.I later received another protective order from a former high-school acquaintance in Wisconsin whom I had also repeatedly contacted while psychotic and seeking help.My former employer then challenged my unemployment benefits. Without an adequate diagnosis documenting what was happening to me, my benefits were revoked, my appeal was unsuccessful, and I was ordered to repay more than $9,000.Without that income, I became homeless in April 2026.After moving through crisis centers and shelters, I eventually reached a tiny-home village. Ironically, becoming homeless and losing my income finally made me eligible for Washington Apple Health/Medicaid and gave me access to the psychiatric care I had been trying to obtain. Harborview has now formally diagnosed my psychosis and considers me to be in recovery.The consequences have been enormous. I remain homeless. I have not seen my daughter since January 2026. Divorce proceedings occurred without my participation, and the resulting orders require supervised visitation that I cannot afford. I also still face the $9,000+ unemployment repayment demand.There is a transgender discrimination component as well. During my illness, people close to me said that I had caused or deserved my condition because I underwent hormone replacement therapy. I believe disability and transgender status affected how I was perceived and treated, including within my family, while I was severely impaired and trying to get help.I also have an unusually extensive contemporaneous record. Beginning in December 2025, I video-journaled nearly every day and published much of it at ofdarknessandlight.net. The recordings document my mental state, deterioration, repeated efforts to obtain help, and many of the events described above. I also have medical records, unemployment and appeal records, employment information, court and protective-order records, and homelessness documentation.I understand that suffering serious harm does not necessarily mean there is a viable legal claim. What troubles me most is the systemic sequence: I was too ill to function, could not access adequate psychiatric care or obtain the diagnosis needed to establish my disability, lost the income keeping me housed, became homeless, and only then became eligible for the health coverage that finally allowed me to receive diagnosis and treatment.I am currently without income and cannot retain counsel on an hourly basis. I am seeking pro bono, contingency, statutory-fee, public-interest, or other appropriate representation. I would be deeply grateful if you could evaluate whether these circumstances present viable disability, civil-rights, community-integration, or related claims. If this is outside your practice, even a referral to someone better positioned to help would mean a great deal.Thank you for reading this and considering my situation.Sincerely,Daphne Garrido Get full access to Of Darkness & Light at www.ofdarknessandlight.net/subscribe

    Garnishments, Setbacks, and a Health Issue

Ratings & Reviews

5
out of 5
3 Ratings

About

Writer, Meditation Instructor, Parent, and Free Thinker Sharing Her Gifts & Story www.ofdarknessandlight.net