Lyle Muller Doesn't Have a Fancy Column Title Podcast

Lyle Muller

Lyle Muller Doesn't Have a Fancy Column Title is from eastern Iowa and deals with how policies and trends affect everyday life. lylemuller.substack.com

Episodes

  1. College energy drinks story came from reporter's strong motivation

    May 1

    College energy drinks story came from reporter's strong motivation

    This podcast also appeared at the Iowa Writers’ Collaborative Emerging Journalist Corps website. Go here to learn more about this effort to showcase reporting by young Iowans. Avery Dykstra, a University of Northern Iowa student in her first year of college but with sophomore standing, felt a strong motivation for writing an Iowa Writers’ Collaborative Emerging Journalist Corps story about energy drinks. “In my generation, I see a lot of my friends go from coffee to energy drinks a lot lately,” she said in a podcast accompanying her story, which you can read at this link. “On campus, especially, it’s a lot of culture. If one friend wants to grab a drink, with another its, ‘me, too.’” Dykstra from Urbandale, wrote in her story: Catered to the younger generation with bright colors and celebrity promotions, energy drink sales are surging. Even with unpleasant side effects — ranging from sleeplessness, anxiety spikes, heart problems and dehydration — demand continues to grow. She goes into detail in this short interview. Avery Dykstra is a University of Northern Iowa sophomore from Urbandale, Iowa. Lyle Muller is a member of the Iowa Writers’ Collaborative and leads the Emerging Journalist Corps. Check out the corps here and some of then Iowa Writers’ Collaborative’s most recent reporting in this week’s summary. The Iowa Writers’ Collaborative Emerging Journalist Corps showcases the work of student journalists selected to participate in the reporting project. The program gives aspiring reporters something increasingly difficult to find in today’s media environment: hands-on mentorship, real-world reporting experience and a public platform for their work. Get full access to Lyle Muller Doesn't Have a Fancy Column Title at lylemuller.substack.com/subscribe

    5 min
  2. Apr 7

    Podcast: Conversation with Iowa Heartlanders President Matt Goetz

    The following is a transcript of this podcast, if you want to read along. Minor edits — such as removing repeated words, ums and the like — were made but the words printed are verbatim. Muller: First of all, thank you for doing this. I want to get an idea of how the idea for the suspension came about and the reasons behind it, and then what you hope to accomplish, or what the Heartlanders hope to accomplish during that year. Goetz: Yeah. So as far as how it came about, our owner told me in early January that he was going to ask our ECHL Board of Governors, which is a group of all the presidents and owners for every team across the league, to potentially let us consider this voluntary suspension of operations for next season. And kind of where I believe it came from is when, when he bought the team in July of 2023, I wouldn’t say that it was in a terrible spot. But certainly, when you buy a team three months before the season is going to start there’s not a whole lot of time to say, ‘let’s figure out what we have here, and then let’s build it the right way, which, when you see teams come into the league like New Mexico down in Albuquerque, is going to have a team that starts next fall. They’ve been operating for a year already. READ THE STORY HERE So for a place that has an 18-month runway versus a three-month runway, and part of that runway is clearing out the issues that got left behind from the previous owner, which was lots of unpaid bills, people in the community that didn’t want to work with us because, even though it was a different ownership group, it’s still the same team name. So in their mind, you stiffed us on money. We’re not going to work with you. So there was a lot of, like, repairing and rebuilding. To do that probably took the better part of that first season. And then, at the end of the first season, we did some reorganization. And we saw lots of progress last season in terms of revenue growth, fan growth, corporate partnership growth, our social media following, the marketing that we were doing, and so we saw some good growth. And then halfway through this season, that growth had kind of stalled out. It certainly hadn’t regressed but it hadn’t continued to grow in the exponential fashion that we had anticipated. So what our owner wanted to do is, it’s expensive to own a team … what he wants to do right now is sort of put pause on things, and then let’s reorganize in terms of local and minority investment. He’s the sole owner of the team, which is a rarity. He’s not the only one in our league, but it’s very rare that there’s not a group of people that do that. And in a lot of other markets, when you have local businesses that are also investors, they’ve got a different interest in making sure that they’re marketing us as well, that they’re using tickets as a way to drive business for them. And so our owner is looking to find additional investment that sort of takes some of the lift off of just the front office staff and coaches to market, to sell tickets, to get people excited about it. Muller: You just made the playoffs last year. Goetz: We did. Yeah. Muller: Did that help? Goetz: What’s really interesting is that in our league, and this is based off of data that we had — the University of Iowa, Tippie College of Business has a data analytics program and so we had a capstone course do a project for us — that in our league, winning and losing really doesn’t impact attendance. It’s there. There are people that will argue that — these are the numbers that were based on four years here, as well as attendance numbers and records across the ECHL. And so to kind of put that into a little more perspective, I go to two Cedar Rapids Kernels games a year. I have no idea who they’re playing. I have no idea if they’re better than the team they’re playing. I have no idea if they even won the last time I was there. I’m there to have a good time. And that’s what minor league sports is by and large. So, there are certainly a group of fans that winning and losing matters to them but that’s more about happiness than it is somebody who’s not a fan making a decision to come to a game or not. So certainly, there’s a lot of good feelings and joviality around that. But, we saw a little bit of an increase in season ticket holders but I attribute that to some changes we had made in the season ticket holder packages. Previously we just had one season ticket. And what we did was, we created a lower tier and an upper tier with differing benefits. And we saw most of our growth, which was about 40 season ticket holders, was from a group of people that hadn’t bought season tickets, that bought in at this new no-frills kind of: just give me the ticket kind of package. And so to get back to your answer, the playoffs are helpful in some regard, but it certainly isn’t something that’s a huge jumping off point, if it’s not something that’s already ingrained in the community. Muller: So, it sounds like what you’re talking about here is a loyalty to just the program for whatever reason. Is that, right? Goetz: Well, we certainly have people that are incredible. We’ve got an amazing season ticket holder base, amazing in terms of, like, the support that they give and the showing up. It’s hard for me to do something five times a year and we have people that are doing this 36 times a year. And when we made the playoffs, they came to all three home games. So they’re doing 39 times a year. They’re making a choice to come and support what we’re doing in the players and the coaches, which is really great. It’s building additional, instead of loyalty, I would maybe say affinity for some of the people who maybe are not hockey enthusiasts. But is this something that you can do a couple times a year because you enjoy it? It’s a family night out instead of going to a movie or going bowling or down to a high school sporting event. Is this something that we can capture more affinity from people? And we made some progress in that certainly. I could bore you with numbers all day long, if you wanted to, but the number of people who come to a game and then come back for a second or third game has almost doubled in the last two years. And that’s a really good sign. But there’s not enough new people getting to a game to fall in love with it, and that’s really where I think we’ve not been able to hit the mark. The people who are here love it and they’re enjoying it probably more and more. The people who have experienced it, are enjoying it and coming back more often, but not quite to the level of — you know, there’s a team in our league has a 5,000 season ticket holder base. (Savannah Ghost Pirates) We have a 5,000-seat arena. That would be lovely if we had that scenario. But it’s it’s not where we are right now. And in our attempts to grow towards that, we just haven’t made the progress that was necessary. So, our owner wants to take a pause, regroup and get some get some additional investment, be that financial, be it relationships. There needs to be some more investment from people locally to make sure that we’ve got the resources and the partnerships to move forward in a way that’s going to be more successful for us moving forward. Muller: Other teams have done this and come back. Goetz: That’s my understanding, yeah. Muller: One thing I’ve been wondering about is just how hard it is to compete with the University of Iowa. For example, you came off a three-day weekend visit, and at that time the Iowa Hawkeyes were in the NCAA basketball tournament. Iowa State was, too, for people want to watch on television. But Iowa was in the men’s tournament, there was an expectation the women might have been there as well. Goetz: Yeah. Muller: How easy is it to compete with that? Goetz: I would say not just the University of Iowa. I’m good friends with André Perry, who’s the executive director over at Hancher, and we were having a conversation a couple weeks ago that: one of the things that’s amazing about living in this community is that there’s, like, 19 different things that you could do every day. And that’s fantastic as a person who lives here but as somebody who’s trying to get people to forget about the other 18, that’s an additional challenge that, maybe, other markets don’t see the same way that we see. And I’m certainly not saying there the other markets that have ECHL franchises don’t have competition either but the University of Iowa is certainly one that’s really, really well ingrained, not just locally, but in the state. And so, whether that’s men’s basketball, women’s basketball, wrestling, football — which, the first third of our season happens during football season — high school football on Friday nights in the fall, the NFL on Sundays. there’s just so many different other opportunities, And so, one, trying to cut through the noise to make sure that people know that we’re available, because our our PR and marketing machine is as hard as our staff works at it. We don’t have the resources or the reach right now that a University of Iowa has so we don’t get the news coverage that they do. So, I would hate to say that it’s insurmountable but it is a reality of where we are right now, and we’ve got to find ways to make our make ourselves more visible and more attractive for people to say yes to once they see us. Muller: What happens with the affiliation with Minnesota Wild during the suspension? Goetz: The Minnesota Wild, we alerted them shortly before the announcement came out and, so, I don’t know what their plans are. Certainly they’re going to need an affiliate in the ECHL. So my assumption, which is not based in fact but my assumption, is that they’re going to look for a team to be an affiliate. And my hope is that they do that on a one-year basis b

    29 min
  3. Jan 4

    PODCAST: 2025 was PolitiFact’s The Year of Lies

    The truth took a big hit in the year we just passed into the rearview mirror, so much so that PolitiFact, which had awarded — if you want to call it that — a Lie of the Year award since 2009, named 2025 The Year of Lies. Many of the falsehoods in 2025 reached the fact-checking news organization’s threshold for being significant: they were repeated often and demonstrably false and consequential. Being consequential was key to these big lies because they negatively affected the lives of several people. PolitiFact Editor-in-Chief Katie Sanders took time to talk about that in this video podcast. We spoke on Dec. 30. Lyle: As you point out in a number of articles at Politifact, the last decade has been a bit of a firehose for falsities, and I want to talk to you at the end about 2026, especially with AI and the ability to produce falsehoods in a very short period of time with perhaps the imagination of a person being the only gate. Katie: Sure. Lyle: Let’s start with the Year of the Lies. How did that all come about? Katie: Well, we went about choosing our Lie of the Year the way we usually do. I round up a list of what I think stood out in terms of the most egregious falsehoods of the year, the most ridiculous, but also the ones that like weren’t just one-offs. They had real significance. So we had a pretty long list — longer than usual — but we’ve had long lists in the past. I mean, we all were there for the 2024 campaign and COVID, and you know, we’ve had a tumultuous decade, as I said in the column. So that part wasn’t unusual. But, when we were talking about how to isolate one, both with our staff just to have the discussion, and then with our leadership at Poynter and Politifact who decide by the year, we just felt it was, I think the word is insufficient, to declare one as more significant and more impactful than all the others because there were just so many strong candidates in the running. And so, it felt like a good time to step back from our annual exercise and try to make a different point about why lies are harmful and why we do this. And, that’s because lies can harm real people. So, we just thought it was time to shake it up because of the moment we’re in is not a moment, it’s an era, and we have to try to get people to care about it. Lyle: Well, few things can really make you feel good about a year than a story that starts with: “The concept of truth feels particularly bleak in 2025. Government leaders deploy up-is-down narratives at an exhausting clip. Online worlds drip with artificial intelligence-generated slop that incites rage. Chatbots answer questions with fabricated information, and the government folds it into a report card on America’s health.” And, it seems like that’s just the tip of the iceberg as far as problems that have existed with keeping a focus on what really is a fact. Katie: Those are all examples from 2025. And, like you said, those are just the items that I linked to in the sentences that are just the tip of the iceberg. … It was day after day. Just the steady drumbeat of what you’re seeing with your own eyes is not real, and what we were caught doing we didn’t do. I guess they did go back and change the MAHA report (Make Our Children Healthy Again) that was informed by some AI hallucinations. Thank you for mentioning the top of the column, because … that was almost the easiest part to write, because it was, just as an observer, looking out for facts every day, that’s that’s how it felt. It felt like an assault on every front. “LIE OF THE YEAR” STARTED WITH SARAH PALIN Lyle: This is the 17th year that you would have been looking at lie of the year. Can you take us through a little bit of a history about lie of the year? Katie: Sure. It predates me in my time at Politifact. It started in 2009. We were, the country was in the throes of a vigorous healthcare debate. … The first Lie of the Year went to Sarah Palin’s claim that the Affordable Care Act had death panels, and that was just, I think, very memorable choice. Again, I wasn’t there until a few years later … The Tampa Bay Times at the time had this idea to step back and kind of have a marketing moment. And so, somebody thought of the term Lie of the Year, and they decided to make it an annual tradition to single out a falsehood that really had a lot to teach us about the year that that we had in political rhetoric. Lyle: … Who’s responsible for all of these lies, because it would be easy to say the last 10 years Donald Trump. But, that’s too easy of an answer, isn’t it? Katie: It is, yes. I don’t want to diminish Trump’s role in shaping the, you know, the nature of our discourse. He … has a penchant for flouting the facts, not letting facts get in the way of a talking point, or many talking points that he likes. No politician has earned the Lie of the Year accolade more than Donald Trump. He’s either won the award outright or shared in it several times since the political scene. Lyle: Yeah, he certainly is good at understanding that a lie is useful. Katie: He’s very good at it. But like I said, the roots of Lie of the Year go back to 2009 so the lying predated Donald Trump. It will come after him as well but he just has a very different relationship to it. But, I think that the point that we also make in the column this year — and in the approach — is that our dire information ecosystem isn’t entirely directed or dependent on Donald Trump as president. You mentioned that we were going to talk about generative AI and how you can, you can invent a viral, convincing falsehood with sophisticated AI — generated imagery and visuals and video like that. You don’t have to be an expert in cutting video or illustration or anything like that. So, we’re going to run into a new front in fake news, to kind of use an old term. And the column makes the point that, you know, we may not have arrived at our … moment of catastrophe with AI, where something so fake has gone so viral and caused this destruction. I feel like that’s been something we’ve heard researchers and journalists warn about for many years now with the rise of deep fake technology, but it did feel in 2025 that we are closer than ever. And, there are several little moments that I talk about in the column. But, there are many, many more examples behind it that show how people on both sides of the political aisle share responsibility for identifying fake stuff online. And, we’re very bad at it collectively. We’re still very bad at it. We have not developed the media literacy skills that help us discern and stop and pause before taking something online at face value. There are a lot of innocuous examples that we kind of cover day to day at PolitiFact. I argue they’re seemingly innocuous: … older Americans at a facility dressed up in funny Halloween costumes that got so many of my friends because it looked so hyper-realistic. It might have gotten me at first too, because I’m, you know, scrolling Instagram like everyone else, time to time. But I look back at that moment and think that that could have been something else that generated a positive response of people saying, “Oh, this is so funny. Share it.” What if it generated different response but it was entirely fabricated. That’s where I get really uncomfortable and kind of fearful about what’s next in 2026 if we don’t become a bit more sophisticated. Lyle: I want to talk about some of the examples that you have in your column. But first, it’s really important to understand the three criteria that PolitiFact looks at for the Lie of the Year, or the Year of the Lies. And, one of them is consequences. Can you take us through the criteria and how you weighed the things that were spoken that weren’t true? LIES’ CONSEQUENCES CARRY WEIGHT Katie: Well, consequences is probably the most important element of this year’s Year of the Lies. I felt like that was the word in the writing and editing of the piece and the associated pieces about humans that were affected by false talking points. That really captured our interest the most this year, was illustrating the consequences. … Usually we will look at the top kind of options for Lie of the Year, we will, our very small committee of about three people, will kind of argue what we think it should be. And, we kind of decide: Yeah, okay, this makes the most sense because it speaks to the criteria of being significant. It’s not going to surprise everyone. Like, everyone knows this one, it was prominent and it had significant consequences. And, we’ve weighed consequences in the past with our selection of COVID-19 falsehoods and denials and downplay or Jan. 6 downplay and denials. But this year, it just didn’t feel like it was enough to kind of retrace the anatomy of the talking point and talk to experts about what this says about our misinformation ecosystem. I’ve written that story or edited that story many times now, and it just felt like we should really focus on one of the key elements of this selection, which is consequences. So we ended up doing a more ambitious package of multiple stories by multiple reporters, which was hard at the moment, but, you know, felt really good once we started rolling it out day after day and giving our readers something new to chew on each day. Lyle: And those criteria: repeated often, demonstrably false and perhaps above all, consequential. And so, one of the consequential items that you had was a farmer in North Dakota, which would be of interest in Iowa as well — a farmer who had grain in, ready to be sold to an international buyer, and the Trump tariffs and foreign policy come into play. Do you remember that one at all, that farmer? Katie: Sure. I remember Randy Richards. I didn’t interview him. My colleague, senior correspondent, Amy Sherman, did. …We weren’t examining the impact of tariffs as poli

    32 min
  4. 09/09/2025

    College student news editors face dilemma reporting visa holders' names and photos

    Back in the day when newspapers I worked at published a daily police log we often we got calls from people who ended up there. Their pathway to the log included shoplifting, drunken driving, simple assault, things like that. The call went something like: Please don’t put my name in the paper. If you do, I will be fired. Or, my wife will find out. Or, in the case of college students, I won’t get into law school or medical school or get my first job after I graduate. Our usual response made sense: Won’t you get fired, in trouble with your wife or with your grad school application because you shoplifted, drove drunk or beat someone? Another call, especially at college newspapers, would be something along the lines of: Please don’t put my name or picture in your story about the political protest I was at because it will cause trouble for me. Sorry, we would say. You were in a public event, likely in a public place, causing a public disruption in order to change public policy. That answer might be changing, and that is cause for concern. College newspapers are being forced to rethink identifying people in stories because of the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown and revocation of F-1 visas for selected college students. The immediate reaction some of you have to that probably is that these students should not have to worry if they behave themselves and don’t disrupt things in the country that willingly took them in so they can take their knowledge back home. If only it were that simple. I wrote about this last spring, but reports of students taken into custody for what they wrote or said in a public forum has students, faculty and staff at colleges and universities on edge, genuinely worrying that the Trump administration vindictively will come after them simply for things Trump and his followers do not like. That would include writing a letter to a student newspaper protesting U.S. policies. It famously happened earlier this year with the deportation case of Rümeysa Öztürk, the Tufts University graduate student from Turkey who wrote an opinion piece for The Tufts Daily student paper about divesting university funds from companies with ties to Israel. Closer to home you have University of Iowa grad students on F-1 visas who sued to overturn their spring 2025 government-ordered deportation. The case still must go to a resolution but the international students have been winning court rulings. Colleges and universities are working to protect their international students from government harassment. One result across the country has been requests from international students to remove their names from stories previously published online. Moreover, the requests extend to removing photos and even entire stories featuring international students who fear they are at risk as the federal government scans the internet for someone to target. Öztürk’s effort to regain her F-1 status is in federal court. She is free from custody after serving 45 days in a Louisiana processing facility. A judge has determined that the Trump administration had no legal right to send masked feds after her and take her from a public street and into custody because of the letter she wrote. “Throughout, I was disoriented, hungry and nauseous,” Öztürk wrote in a piece for Vanity Fair and her student paper about being in custody. “In Georgia, after suffering a severe asthma attack without my primary inhaler and having a hard cry, I was feeling completely hopeless. In Louisiana, I found myself in a cramped, cagelike bus, waiting for hours. I watched as countless people arrived from a nearby plane, all shackled — hands, feet and waists.” So, yeah, international students are worried and young journalists on a lot of campuses are scrambling to figure out how to cover them. Grinnell College Scarlet & Black co-editors Taylor Nunley (left at table) and Sarah Evans preside over the student paper’s first layout session Sept. 4, 2025. (Photo by Lyle Muller) The student journalists worry that the common practice of identifying people in stories — for accuracy but also ethical reasons dealing with authenticity — might cause undo harm to those people. The Tufts Daily editors have though about it and have a policy that says requests that names be removed from online stories get reviewed by an Ethics and Inclusion Committee and the Managing Board, with the newspaper holding the right to grant or refuse the request. College student editors questioning whether or not they should identify people who make public calls to change public policy is serious business. We need accuracy and knowledge of those who have an effect on our notion of what is normal. Withholding public information could alter factual descriptions of a newsworthy, historical event. Grinnell College student Tammy Zywicki was a staff photographer for The Scarlet & Black. Her unsolved murder made national news in 1992 when she failed to show up for the beginning of the fall semester. Her body was found in Missouri. This is a photo of the page layout for a Sept. 8 story in the newspaper about her death and photos for the paper. (Photo by Lyle Muller) On the other side of the news desk, students who stop expressing opinions in their college paper or do not participate in a political event for fear of being identified on a news website and arrested by feds have a chilling effect, too, especially if they are not committing a crime. Losing their voices can raise questions years down the road that range from “what were they thinking?” to “why didn’t they do anything to stop that?” Students I work with as the Grinnell College Scarlet & Black professional adviser are trying to come up with a policy as quickly as possible to deal with requests by students who fear being identified. That includes stories previously published and online for some time. It also goes for S&B staff who are part of a college known for its diversity and international student population. Real names give stories credibility. But for some that now comes with a risk. “In normal circumstances, we wouldn't necessarily be going back and, like, redact all sorts of things,” S&B co-editor in chief Sarah Evans said. “But these are not necessarily normal circumstances.” Evans said the policy will be explained to its audience once it is completed. “I think it's been a little bit difficult to do that in real time,” she said. “We're trying to make a policy that makes sure that our journalism isn't doing any harm to the people we're covering, or just to the general Grinnell community as a whole. And that takes into account a lot of the changes that we've been seeing in the past.” The college reported in the latest S&B edition that only 24% of international students offered a spot accepted and enrolles for the fall semester. The rate was 42% for 2024 and 41% for 2023. College admissions officials said they suspect anti-immigration rhetoric and administration actions against international students left some wary of coming to the United States. Also, The S&B’s Akash Roy reported, incoming students were having problems getting appointments for visas as late as going into August. For those who think all of this is coddling and nonsense, you need to see a larger picture. You don’t want lawbreakers you can ship out of the county to be here? Makes sense. But due process should be used to send them back according to the law, not a trumped up (pun intended) charge based on a political belief that may include criticism of the United States. If the infraction is writing a letter, protesting a perceived injustice, demonstrating in favor of a political view, check the First Amendment and how the U.S. Bill of Rights applies to anybody, not just U.S. citizens. Lyle Muller is a proud member of the Iowa Writers Collaborative. Go here to learn more about the collaborative and its journalists and support all local journalists who write for your community. He is a retired Iowa journalist who still works as an independent contractor and professional adviser for Grinnell College’s The Scarlet & Black newspaper. His views are his own and do not reflect those of any official at Grinnell College or the institution. Get full access to Lyle Muller Doesn't Have a Fancy Column Title at lylemuller.substack.com/subscribe

    2 min

About

Lyle Muller Doesn't Have a Fancy Column Title is from eastern Iowa and deals with how policies and trends affect everyday life. lylemuller.substack.com