Alright let’s break this down properly because the list of issues isn’t short and it’s not random either. First, the presale. We’ve seen continuous extensions. The countdown says ending soon. Then it extends. Then it resets. Then there’s a bigger bonus. Then another phase. At some point “last chance” becomes a subscription service. Bonuses reportedly escalated into extreme territory, reaching levels that materially dilute earlier participants. When late entries receive massive percentage increases, it’s fair to ask what that does to token distribution and effective supply at launch. Because math doesn’t care about marketing. Then there’s the listing narrative. A five cent listing price was referenced repeatedly alongside aggressive return projections. At the same time, claims of launching on twenty exchanges circulated, while only limited confirmations were publicly visible. When numbers are big and confirmations are small, people start counting. Liquidity is another obvious question. If substantial capital was raised and substantial bonuses were distributed, investors naturally want to see how circulating supply reconciles with liquidity provisioning. If the supply is large and liquidity is thin, volatility isn’t a mystery. It’s predictable. There has not been a full independent public audit of treasury funds. No comprehensive reconciliation showing total tokens sold, vesting schedules, bonus allocations, and final circulating supply in one clear document. When nine figures are discussed publicly, spreadsheets should not be optional. Technical concerns were also raised. Written communication suggested the network was not fully ready at certain points, while marketing indicated readiness. Claim portal issues occurred. Some wallets displayed no allocation found. Others reported incorrect vesting amounts. If a launch is imminent, the plumbing usually needs to work. Governance structure became another focal point. Ultimate beneficial control reportedly rested with one individual during significant operations. That level of centralized authority isn’t illegal, but it does increase the importance of disclosure when retail capital is involved. Then things escalated. After transparency concerns were raised publicly, reports surfaced of DMCA takedown attempts, harassment across platforms, and wallets appearing excluded from claim allocations. Meanwhile, articles circulated alleging large referral payments to critics, which were denied. The timing of all of it raised eyebrows. There were also sponsorship questions involving major football clubs, reports of unpaid obligations, and continued promotional usage of branding after apparent termination. If partnerships end, branding usually ends with it. That’s standard business practice. The core issue isn’t one isolated event. It’s the pattern. Presale extensions. Escalating bonuses. Unreconciled supply figures. No full audit. Technical inconsistencies. Governance opacity. Legal escalation. When you stack those items together, investors don’t need drama. They need clarity. Because in crypto, hype can create momentum. But reconciliation creates confidence. And right now, people are asking for the spreadsheets.
