Progressive Indiana Network Special Events

Progressive Indiana Network
  • 0.0 (0)
  • News

PIN special events: debates, town halls, collaborations. www.progressiveindiana.net

  1. Oct 26

    Indiana’s State House District 4 Virtual Debate

    Moderators: Scott Aaron Rogers: https://hoosleft.us/ Dion Bergeron: https://www.youtube.com/@dionsdailydose Candidates: Ryan Kominakis (D): https://www.ryankominakis.com/ Travis Gearhart (L): https://www.travisgearhart.com/ SUMMARY: With just over a week until Election Day, HoosLeft host Scott Aaron Rogers and Dion’s Daily Dose host Dion Bergeron co-moderated a debate for Indiana House District 4, which covers parts of Porter County including Valparaiso and Kouts. Democrat Ryan Kominakis and Libertarian Travis Gearhart took part. Republican incumbent Ed Soliday, who has chaired the House Utilities Committee since 2011, was invited but did not respond to the moderators’ requests. The candidates answered ten questions across five topic areas — cost of living, health care, education, economic development, and public safety — followed by a 12-question yes/no speed round and closing statements. The two found wide common ground: both criticized corporate tax breaks and data center subsidies, called for repealing right-to-work, backed legalizing and taxing cannabis, and were critical of license plate cameras and of Soliday. They split on a data center moratorium and on school vouchers, which. Gearhart closed by urging voters who don’t choose him to vote for Kominakis rather than Soliday. Progressive Indiana Network is powered entirely by our subscribers. To help us continue presenting special events like this, please consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. BREAKDOWN: 00:00:31 Introduction Rogers and Bergeron introduce themselves and the candidates, note that Soliday did not respond to requests to participate, and explain the format: two-minute opening statements, five topic areas with two questions each (one from each moderator), 90 seconds per answer with alternating turn order, a yes/no speed round, and two-minute closings. 00:02:07 Opening Statements Gearhart goes first, as determined by a backstage coin flip. - Gearhart: Former Republican: South County Republican chair, Hebron Town Council member, and an unsuccessful at-large county council candidate. Left politics disenfranchised and returned after Soliday’s text message to Republican Portage Mayor Austin Bonta. Says he was always more libertarian and that a third-party candidate isn’t beholden to downstate special interest money. Describes Northwest Indiana as a mixed bag, neither red nor blue. - Kominakis: Marine Corps veteran who deployed multiple times in five years, including Afghanistan. Says he fights for workers every day. Criticized Soliday’s 20 years in office, especially as House Utilities chair, for corporate handouts and for representing donors over constituents. Pledged to be a real voice for House District 4. (Parts of his statement were lost to a connection problem, which Rogers noted afterward.) 00:06:48 Q1: Housing and Local Control (Cost of Living) Bergeron cited a $275,000 statewide median home price, a national first-time buyer median age of 40, and House Enrolled Act 1001’s pros and cons. He asked what else Indiana should do for housing affordability in Porter County and how much the state should decide versus local communities. - Gearhart: Agrees with critics that decisions should be as local as possible. Fine with cutting red tape and zoning hurdles but says local governments need autonomy. Compared it to data centers, where local voters’ objections should be heard. Said the bigger fix is raising Hoosier wages by attracting good jobs, not small data centers. - Kominakis: Noted Valparaiso requires builders to include some affordable housing. Said first-time buyers face private mortgage insurance and down payments, which his VA loan let him avoid, and that young buyers likely need subsidies. Said he isn’t deeply versed in HEA 1001 and would want to investigate it. Called for common-sense solutions. 00:11:48 Q2: Utility Rates (Cost of Living) Rogers cited a NIPSCO rate increase of about $23 a month (nearly 17%) and noted the House Utilities Committee shapes the rules on trackers, the sales tax on utility bills, and fixed charges. He asked what changes each candidate would support in January and how to keep them from raising costs elsewhere. - Kominakis: Said Soliday, as House Utilities chair, is far more than one vote and wrote the legislation that raised utility bills. Wants to repeal laws that let utilities pass costs to customers through trackers outside the regular rate case, including those tied to House Bill 1007. - Gearhart: Agreed with Kominakis “100%” and would go further: a full audit of NiSource and a rethink of the legal monopoly system. Floated changing how the IURC is chosen, such as election by mayors instead of governor appointment, without committing to a single fix. Cited rate increases and a large CEO pay raise at NiSource. Added that a Republican text message criticizing him for saying he would caucus with Democrats shows why he would. 00:16:40 Q3: Medicaid Cuts and Fraud (Health Care) Rogers cited a drop of about 343,000 in Indiana’s Medicaid rolls in a year, many due to missed paperwork, a new federal pilot using AI to look for billing fraud, and work requirements beginning in January. He asked where to draw the line between guarding against fraud and keeping eligible Hoosiers covered. - Gearhart: Supports finding fraud, but wants it pursued at the top level too, including corporate subsidies such as data center tax cuts (”corporate welfare”). Said Republicans tend to slash and burn, and that cuts must be measured and targeted. Asked why so many Hoosiers need assistance and pointed to bringing in high-paying, often union, jobs. - Kominakis: Said health care should be a right and that people will lose coverage under these laws while officials focus on cuts rather than people. Pointed to a $4 billion surplus and said data centers should invest in Hoosier communities. Faulted Soliday for not forcing that through House Bill 1601 and said he would negotiate to get something in return for constituents. 00:21:34 Q4: Medicaid Waivers (Health Care) Bergeron described caps on waiver services, two full waivers, and a waiting list of more than 13,600 Hoosiers. He asked about the state’s responsibility to people on the waivers and to providers, and for one specific thing each would do in the House to protect them. - Kominakis: His wife used to work at Opportunity Enterprises. Said the state should take care of vulnerable people and pointed to the $4 billion surplus and $655 million in tax revenue lost to data center incentives. Believes the needs can be met without raising taxes. Blamed the Republican supermajority for protecting corporations and utilities and said he expects to flip it. - Gearhart: His fiancée, a past Direct Support Professional of the Year, works at Opportunity Enterprises. Agreed with Kominakis and called handing large tax breaks to big companies cronyism, not free-market capitalism. Called cutting necessary services amid a surplus “criminal.” Proposed legalizing and taxing marijuana as one way to pay for services. 00:27:43 Q5: Funding Priorities and Property Taxes (Education) Bergeron described Senate Enrolled Act 1’s property tax limits and the state budget split, with education and health and human services making up nearly 87% of the roughly $46 billion general fund. He asked whether more money for schools or health care would come from cuts, taxes, or something else, and for one specific cut or tax. - Gearhart: Said Indiana is taxed enough. Criticized the state for cutting property taxes while shifting burdens to local governments and stripping local authority — “pick a lane.” Would rather cut the income tax than property taxes. Would end corporate tax breaks and legalize and tax cannabis, citing Michigan and Illinois. - Kominakis: Called SB 1 a scam that siphons money from police, fire, and schools and leaves communities choosing among a local income tax, a school referendum, or accepting data centers. Said local officials of all parties are angry a… Get full access to Progressive Indiana Network at www.progressiveindiana.net/subscribe

    Indiana’s State House District 4 Virtual Debate

  2. Oct 6

    PIN Virtual Town Hall w/ Kelly Thompson for IN-3

    https://progressiveindiana.net https://www.kellythompsonforcongress.com/ SUMMARY: Kelly Thompson, Democratic candidate for Congress in Indiana’s 3rd District, joined Scott Aaron Rogers for a PIN virtual town hall covering her evolution from a Republican upbringing to a progressive Democrat, campaign fundraising and her opponent Marlin Stutzman’s refusal to debate or hold town halls, voter disillusionment and turnout, the root causes of the affordability crisis, a single-payer healthcare system, her opposition to AIPAC money in congressional leadership, free public college and trade education, the U.S.-China relationship, government regulation (and in some cases nationalization) of utilities and other essential industries, and the risks and regulation of AI and data centers. Progressive Indiana Network is subscriber-supported independent media. To help us continue doing this work, please consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. IN DEPTH: 0:00:21 - Introductions and welcome - Scott opens the town hall, explains PIN’s mission, and notes how viewers can submit questions via chat, the web form, or QR code - He frames these virtual town halls as a public service for voters who can’t attend in-person events 0:02:49 - Kelly introduces herself and her “Running Like a Mother” campaign - Thompson describes her background: lives in North Webster, runs a concrete contracting business with her husband, has six adult children and 13 grandchildren, and founded a nonprofit serving local families - She recounts an unsuccessful 2020 statehouse run, after which her district was redrawn around her home - She explains her campaign slogan, “running like a mother,” as a mama-bear instinct to protect people before they’re the ones getting hurt - She says her family’s diversity (including a mother with stage four breast cancer and a sister lost to addiction) shaped her decision to run after watching Congress fail to check the executive branch 0:05:56 - Q (Tom Snyder, Facebook Live): With Indiana being so “Trumplican,” do you have funds for advertising? - Thompson pushes back on the “Indiana is red” framing, arguing it discourages turnout and reinforces the idea that votes don’t matter - She says the campaign is nearing a $100,000 fundraising threshold needed to launch a full digital ad campaign (TV, streaming, and social) focused on the district’s rural counties - She argues her policies for farmers, educators, and truck drivers are paid-for and have a positive ROI for those communities 0:08:17 - Q: You used to be a Republican — trace your political evolution to progressive Democrat - Thompson says she was raised in a fundamentalist church that taught “Republicans go to heaven, Democrats go to hell” - She credits running a nonprofit, raising six children close in age, and her eldest daughter introducing her to mutual aid and solidarity (she founded Forward Indiana’s food pantries) with reshaping her politics - She describes her father’s muted reaction to her 2020 run and says both parents are now committed straight-ticket Democratic voters, partly due to her mother’s cancer diagnosis and experience with UnitedHealthcare - She shares anecdotes of persuading skeptical Republican voters, including one who donated $1,000 despite disagreeing with her on some issues 0:15:41 - Q (Jeannie Garriott Ford, Facebook): Will Stutzman debate you, and how will you be different from him? - Thompson says she’s repeatedly asked for a debate and been told local media won’t host one because Stutzman won’t show, which she calls a “breach of contract” with constituents - She pledges to be available, hold town halls, and bring constituents along in the legislative process rather than operate “behind the curtain” - She contrasts herself with Marlin Stutzman, whom she accuses of relaying “White House approved rhetoric” and engaging in culture-war distractions - She lists affordable healthcare, housing, food, and education — and saving family farms (which she says the country is losing at a rate of 61 a day) — as her priorities in Congress 0:19:32 - Q (Kelly in Leesburg): How do you stay focused every day on the crisis, and what’s your first priority in Congress? - Thompson compares staying focused on the “crisis” to fighting a house fire that’s endangering people you love, and says it’s okay if voters need to look away sometimes while she stays locked in - She names campaign finance reform — getting big money out of elections — as foundational to everything else Congress needs to fix - She cites a Yale study on single-payer healthcare, saying it would save “114,000 lives a year and a trillion dollars.” - She argues lawmakers who take pharmaceutical and insurance industry money are “complicit” in preventable deaths, and frames this as a bipartisan problem 0:25:10 - Q (Tom Snyder): How do we get people disillusioned with government in general to come out and vote? - Thompson says she can only speak to her own approach: building a direct, ongoing relationship with constituents and publicly naming lawmakers who block popular policies - She cites having roughly 63,000 Facebook followers as a tool to hold other members of Congress accountable in public - She argues that voter suppression efforts (citing the gutting of the Voting Rights Act, mid-cycle redistricting, shortened early voting, and the SAVE Act) prove that votes are powerful, not powerless - She describes a house-party conversation with a group of Republican-leaning voters, including a retired GOP state legislator, that ended with yard signs and donations 0:30:55 - Q: What’s the root of the affordability crisis, and how will you solve it? - Thompson says the root problem is twofold: wages are too low and costs are too high, which benefits corporations at people’s expense - She blames tariffs (which she calls disguised taxes) for raising costs on construction materials like lumber, fly ash, and potash imported from Canada, and for hurting the housing market - She proposes passing the PRO Act to strengthen organized labor, enacting a single-payer healthcare system so unions don’t have to bargain over healthcare, and creating a federal jobs guarantee tied to needs like electrical grid modernization - She criticizes “record corporate profits” that aren’t matched by “record worker wages” as a sign of a government focused on corporations rather than people 0:34:47 - Q (@TimothyMusic-x9y on YouTube): Will you be in Columbia City again soon, where some voters filter policy through their religious beliefs? - Thompson confirms she held a town hall in Columbia City about three weeks earlier and lists upcoming stops in Wells County (Bluffton) and Jay County - She argues the Republican platform doesn’t align with Christian teaching, despite some voters’ belief that it does - She says her strategy is to keep showing up in person so people can connect her platform with values they recognize from their faith - Scott adds that he thinks critics are “looking in the wrong books” of the Bible for policy guidance 0:39:50 - Q: What should be in the Democrats’ own roadmap to counter Project 2025? - Thompson says Democrats are now in the position of having to both undo damage from Project 2025 and build a positive agenda at the same time - She says Congress needs to recruit back the experienced officials purged from agencies like the military and the CDC - She frames her campaign as part of a roughly 98-candidate “Take BAC Congress” coalition of first-time candidates aiming to represent working-class America - She jokes about renaming a future Democratic platform something like “make the country safe again” or simply restoring constitutional government 0:42:01 - Q: Why is a single-payer, Medicare for All system the best healthcare solution? - Thompson argues that as long as private insurers are involved in healthcare, the system will be wired for profit rather than patient outcomes - She says insurance companies, which lack medical expertise, shouldn’t have control over treatment decisions that belong to patients and… Get full access to Progressive Indiana Network at www.progressiveindiana.net/subscribe

    PIN Virtual Town Hall w/ Kelly Thompson for IN-3

  3. Sep 22

    PIN Virtual Town Hall w/ Cinde Wirth for IN-6

    https://progressiveindiana.net https://wirth4congress.com/ SUMMARY: Dr. Cinde Wirth, Democratic candidate for Congress in Indiana’s 6th District, joined Scott Aaron Rogers for a PIN virtual town hall covering the Trump administration’s tariffs and their impact on farmers, congressional accountability and impeachment, her continued support for abolishing ICE, online harassment tied to her immigration advocacy, her opponent Jefferson Shreve’s refusal to hold town halls or debates, the collision of AI and data center development with Indiana’s land, water, and electricity costs, organized labor’s role in that fight, the U.S.-China relationship and the gutting of the State Department, the national debt, conditioning military aid to Israel, single-payer healthcare, food insecurity, and Social Security solvency. She closed with support for the John Lewis Voting Rights Act and opposition to “poison pill” riders in congressional legislation. Progressive Indiana Network is subscriber-supported independent media. To help us continue doing this work, please consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. IN DEPTH: 0:00:22 - Introductions and welcome - Scott opens the town hall, explains PIN’s mission and how viewers can submit questions - Welcomes Dr. Cinde Wirth back to the network - Wirth introduces herself as a seventh-generation Hoosier from Bartholomew County, a teacher and scientist - She describes her path into politics via the Albert Einstein Distinguished Educator Fellowship on Capitol Hill in 2018 - She recounts her small-business and community-board background in Columbus, Indiana before running for office 0:06:35 - Q: What’s your read on the impact of Trump’s tariffs on farmers, and what should trade policy look like? - Wirth says tariff harm to farmers ripples out to affect everyone connected to agriculture - She argues the tariffs are likely unconstitutional, since Congress — not the executive — holds the power to levy them - She cites harm to grain, soybean, corn, tomato, and cattle producers alike - She says a functioning Congress could use its oversight tools to rein in the executive branch, but Jefferson Shreve won’t do it 0:09:47 - Q: What does accountability look like under a Democratic Congress — is impeachment on the table? - Wirth says impeachment is justified given the administration’s unconstitutional actions, including the Maduro operation - She says accountability may come through multiple channels, including international bodies, but some paths take time - She stresses that Congress’s checks-and-balances role is currently non-functional - She pivots to the urgency of early voting, noting Indiana’s election period runs October 6 to November 2, not just Election Day 0:16:39 - Q: Do you still support abolishing ICE? - Wirth reaffirms her stance, saying officers who follow unlawful orders should be held accountable - She describes stories from canvassing about families torn apart by ICE - She emphasizes immigrants’ contributions to communities and lack of due process in enforcement 0:18:56 - Q: If not ICE, what replaces it, and how do we handle actual criminal offenders? - Wirth says existing law enforcement already knows how to identify and detain criminals - She criticizes ICE for detaining people at their own immigration hearings - She points to bipartisan immigration legislation that was shelved for political reasons in 2024 - She calls for an immigration system that is understandable, affordable, and humane, grounded in due process 0:22:24 - Q (anonymous viewer): How do social media trolls and haters influence your campaign? - Wirth says they don’t influence her, noting the racist double standard in anti-immigrant rhetoric - She describes her own immigrant ancestry (Irish, Scottish, Czech, English, German) - She argues the backlash is about racism, not immigration policy, and says she has weathered bullies her whole life - Scott adds that much hostile social media activity comes from bots and foreign-operated accounts, not real constituents 0:31:07 - Q (Paige, South Indianapolis): How do independents and Republicans feel about Shreve refusing to debate or hold town halls? - Wirth says Republicans she’s spoken with want to hear directly from candidates - She describes attending a town hall hosted by Sarah Janisse Brown, where voters engaged with her despite not being her base - She recounts Shreve’s campaign dismissing a joint town hall request from the League of Women Voters, NAACP, and Indivisible chapters as a “leftist” setup - She defends those groups’ nonpartisan status and history 0:35:20 - Q (Kylie, Hancock County): What federal plan would you support to address data centers’ costs to ratepayers, land prices, and AI risks like harmful chatbots? - Wirth says data center growth is driven by corporate profit at the expense of Hoosier communities - She cites rate increases of over 30% tied to infrastructure costs passed on to consumers - She describes environmental harms: water strain, pollution, noise, and effects on wildlife reproduction - She says she supports a federal moratorium on new data centers pending greater transparency and environmental safeguards 0:40:59 - Q: What about the risks of the AI models themselves? - Wirth says she is concerned that industry leaders remain focused on profit over responsibility - She calls for slowing down AI development and listening to credentialed professionals and industry insiders raising alarms - She pushes back on the framing of an AI “race” with China, criticizing rhetoric from figures like Ted Cruz as xenophobic 0:44:08 - Q: Organized labor is one of the few groups supporting the AI data center push — how do you thread that needle? - Wirth calls for ending “right to work” laws and strengthening labor unions - She proposes redirecting labor toward rebuilding schools (funded by ending Indiana’s voucher program) instead of building data centers - She argues that redirected FEMA funding, currently going to ICE, could instead support flood recovery and infrastructure work for unions like LiUNA 0:48:08 - Q: How do you see the broader U.S.-China relationship? - Wirth says restoring a professional diplomatic corps is a top priority, noting the State Department was gutted in the DOGE cuts - She says the public lacks visibility into diplomatic operations and criticizes less-qualified political appointees handling sensitive negotiations - She says she is not a China expert but argues displaced career diplomats should be brought back into government 0:52:01 - Q: The national debt has surpassed $40 trillion — are you worried? - Wirth says yes, but argues deficit reduction cannot come from cutting Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, or education - She calls for ending tax breaks for billionaires and corporations and enforcing antitrust and consumer protection laws - She criticizes unauthorized military spending as part of the problem 0:55:17 - Q: Should the U.S. condition, limit, or cut military aid to Israel? - Wirth says the U.N.-recognized genocide in Gaza and Hamas’s actions both demand accountability - She calls for a ceasefire and a restored diplomatic corps to help navigate a two-state solution - She says the U.S. can’t leave Israel “high and dry” as an ally but that Israel must be held accountable - Pressed directly on whether aid should be conditioned, she answers “absolutely,” and confirms “yes” when Scott follows up 1:00:18 - Q (Mark): What is your solution for the broken healthcare system? - Wirth advocates for single-payer, Medicare for All, citing administrative overhead dropping from 20-30% to roughly 3-5% - She estimates the switch equates to about a $24,000 annual raise for most people through eliminated premiums - She says it would “unbundle” jobs from healthcare, benefiting farm families and small businesses - She cites polling showing approval has risen from 70% to over 80% 1:03:03 - Q: What happens to the health insurance industry under Medicare for All? - Wirth says insurance corporations would need to find new business models - She says current … Get full access to Progressive Indiana Network at www.progressiveindiana.net/subscribe

    PIN Virtual Town Hall w/ Cinde Wirth for IN-6

  4. Sep 1

    PIN Virtual Town Hall w/ Drew Cox for IN-4

    https://progressiveindiana.net https://www.drewcox.org/ SUMMARY: In this first PIN Virtual Town Hall of the general election season, Scott Aaron Rogers sits down with Drew Cox, the Democratic congressional candidate in Indiana’s 4th District, who is taking a leave of absence from his position as a music history professor at Purdue University to campaign full time. Cox — a Marine Corps veteran, farmer’s son, and grassroots-only fundraiser — makes a consistent case throughout the hour that nearly every affordability problem Hoosiers face traces back to the same root causes: a Congress bought by corporate donors, a president acting without constitutional constraint, and a Supreme Court that has enabled both. The conversation covers tariffs, the war in Iran, veteran’s care, farm policy, hemp and cannabis, right to repair, FEMA and disaster response, Citizens United, Supreme Court reform, congressional stock trading, Ukraine, and single-payer health care. Viewer questions came from Witherman39 on YouTube, Darcy in Clayton, Hendricks Blue in Avon, Edward on YouTube, and Malcolm on progressiveindiana.net. Progressive Indiana Network is subscriber-supported independent media. To help us continue doing this work, please consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. IN DEPTH: 0:00:22 - Introductions - Scott opens the first general-election-season PIN town hall and previews upcoming appearances from Mary Allen (8th District), Cinde Wirth (6th), Kelly Thompson (3rd), and Brad Meyer (9th). - Cox introduces himself: Tippecanoe County resident, raised in Henry County, son of a fourth-generation farmer and a 37-year elementary school educator, Marine Corps veteran, and Purdue music history professor on leave to campaign full time. - His campaign structure is lean — he is simultaneously the candidate, the logistical manager, and the primary phone-banker, making hundreds of calls per day — funded entirely by what he calls “ethically sourced” grassroots donations. - The goal: win in November and not return to Purdue in January. 0:05:54 - Q: Everything is getting more expensive and paychecks haven’t kept up. What are you going to do about it in Washington? - Cox leads with tariffs: constitutionally a congressional responsibility, but the current Congress has abdicated that role entirely, allowing Trump to levy them as an emotional and political tool with costs passed directly to consumers while the Supreme Court has ruled corporations get profits back. - The war in Iran compounds the affordability crisis directly — fertilizer and goods flow through the Strait of Hormuz, squeezing Indiana farmers, while gas prices are expected to stay above $3 for years. - Jim Baird has voted six times in support of continued bombardment, tying him directly to those economic consequences for his own farm-heavy district. - Cox’s confidence is in the incoming 120th Congress — he believes enough grassroots candidates will be elected to reassert congressional authority on both tariffs and war powers, and he’s prepared to push for impeachment given Trump’s violations of both emoluments clauses. 0:11:28 - Q: Would you use Congress’s power of the purse to defund the Iran war? - Unequivocally yes — “defund the war, not defund the troops.” Cox is a Marine Corps veteran and draws a sharp distinction between supporting service members and funding a war he views as illegal and ill-conceived. - The administration, he argues, is repeating the same pattern as the post-9/11 wars: vague goals, a fear-based justification (nuclear threat from Iran), and no honest accounting of casualties or costs. - He notes the practical military fallout: U.S. bases throughout the region have been damaged or destroyed, limiting port-of-call options — which is exactly why the USS Abraham Lincoln went 250-plus days without resupply. - Iran’s supposed nuclear capability was declared fully destroyed last summer, yet the war continues — Cox takes this as evidence that the stated rationale was never the real one. 0:16:20 - Q: After the war, should we rebuild those Middle East bases? Are we overextended with 70-plus countries hosting U.S. military presence? - Cox declines to give a clean answer, arguing the question is genuinely premature — we don’t yet know the full fallout from the Iran conflict, including what long-term retaliation might look like. - He draws on Ghost Wars by Steve Coll and Descent into Chaos by Ahmed Rashid to contextualize the risk: the U.S. military footprint in the region after Desert Storm is what radicalized bin Laden and set 9/11 in motion, and history should inform how we think about blowback now. - The lesson is not isolationism but humility — we don’t understand the damage we’ve caused or what long-term game adversaries may now be planning. 0:20:25 - Q: As a veteran who navigates the VA, how would you improve it? - The biggest threat to the VA is deliberate sabotage-by-privatization: allowing vets to use private-sector doctors sounds compassionate but pushes them into a broken private system while hollowing out the VA’s funding and staff — Cox received a letter shortly after Trump’s election informing him his VA doctor had left and he’d been assigned a nurse practitioner. - Scott draws an explicit parallel to Indiana Republicans starving public schools and then pointing to poor outcomes as justification for vouchers — the same playbook. 0:23:34 - Q: Are you a Medicare for All guy? - Unequivocally yes — Cox argues the case on efficiency grounds: government doesn’t carry the overhead of marketing competing plans or generating profit, and Social Security’s roughly 2% overhead is the model to emulate. - The Sanders Medicare for All Act would establish government negotiation of prescription prices and universal coverage — Cox frames the additional tax cost as far preferable to a system producing 500,000 medical bankruptcies a year. - His personal stakes are direct: his nephew, born with a heart defect who had a transplant at age two and takes 20 pills daily, was thrown off Medicaid when Indiana got ahead of the “big, beautiful bill” cuts — as was a cousin. - The Yale study finding that Medicare for All would save 114,000 lives and a trillion dollars annually is exactly the kind of evidence Cox says we’re conditioned to ignore — the only people who truly can’t afford it are hospital and insurance CEOs protecting their $30 million salaries. 0:28:46 - Q: What would you like Congress to do on antitrust? - The corporate concentration problem is at the heart of the affordability crisis — from agriculture (Monsanto/Bayer’s dominance of the seed market) to media to cell phones, oligarchies and monopolies raise prices and suppress competition. - In agriculture specifically, Cox wants to reform how subsidies are calculated — basing them on per-acre input costs rather than raw acreage, which currently rewards massive operations at the expense of small farmers already facing record bankruptcy rates this year. - He is wary of the Bayer/Monsanto dynamic — Monsanto’s Roundup has been linked to non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in massive litigation settlements, while Bayer (Monsanto’s parent company) previously marketed Aliqopa® (copanlisib), a treatment for relapsed follicular lymphoma (a form of NHL), before voluntarily withdrawing it from the U.S. market in 2023 after it failed to confirm clinical benefit in a follow-up trial — and flags the broader conflict as the kind of vertically integrated arrangement that antitrust law should scrutinize. [Cox flagged this detail as unverified at the time; the connection is substantiated but more limited than implied.] - The structural root of all of this, in Cox’s view, is Citizens United — he points to the Thomas Massie vs. Ed Gallrein primary in Kentucky as the most expensive congressional race in history, decided largely by outside money from people who don’t even live in the district. 0:33:37 - Q (viewer, Witherman39): How would farmers being allowed to farm hemp help? - Cox’s father would switch to hemp today if he cou… Get full access to Progressive Indiana Network at www.progressiveindiana.net/subscribe

    PIN Virtual Town Hall w/ Drew Cox for IN-4

  5. May 23

    Virtual Town Hall w/ Blythe Potter for Secretary of State

    https://progressiveindiana.net https://www.blythepotter.com/ SUMMARY: In this PIN Virtual Town Hall, Brianna - The Recovered Republican - hosts Blythe Potter, Democratic candidate for Indiana Secretary of State. Potter — an Army veteran, small business owner, and mother from Johnson County — makes the case that the Secretary of State’s office should be a boring, customer-service-oriented administrative job, and that she has the organizational and marketing background to fix it. The conversation ranges across voter accessibility, website modernization, transparency, office culture, digital disinformation, and election security, with Potter consistently returning to three themes: proactive voter outreach through a comprehensive statewide ballot book, citizen-led ballot initiatives as the mechanism for expanding voting options, and restoring basic accountability to an office she says has been hollowed out by Diego Morales’s nepotism and cronyism. Viewer questions from touched on auto-mail ballots, an Indiana Office of Digital Integrity, reallocation of overpaid political hires, and the obstacles Potter has faced from party insiders during the primary. Progressive Indiana Network is subscriber-supported independent media. To help us continue doing this work, please consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. IN DEPTH: 0:00:22 - Introductions - Brianna Indiana opens the town hall under her “Recovered Republican” banner, framing the evening around transparency, accountability, and substance over soundbites. - Potter introduces herself as a mom, Army veteran, and small business owner — and argues that the Secretary of State’s office should fundamentally be a boring administrative job focused on maintaining systems, securing data, and serving the public. - She draws on 30 years in customer service and 20 years of administrative work, and flags two core problems she wants to fix: Hoosiers who show up to vote without knowing what’s on their ballot, and the broken INBiz website that she and her own business partner struggled to navigate. - Her pitch in brief: if you want people to know about elections, you market them — and as a small business owner, that’s exactly what she does every day. 0:04:20 - Q: What concrete steps would you take in the first year to make voting easier and more accessible? - Potter’s centerpiece proposal is a comprehensive statewide ballot book — mailed opt-in to registered voters, available online, in Braille, and in multiple languages — that goes well beyond the current website’s bare office/name/party listing. - She would start by adding public feedback boxes to all Secretary of State websites (including INBiz) to let end users identify what’s broken, rather than imposing top-down fixes. - Roughly 10% of Indiana’s population — over 600,000 residents — lacks internet access, so physical mail distribution is essential, not optional. - Funding mechanisms include HAVA grants and existing budget reallocation; the goal is to make election information so ubiquitous that voters would have to “intentionally ignore” it. 0:07:58 - Q: What specific transparency measures would you implement to end no-bid contracts and restore accountability? - Potter would open the office with an independent audit, release the results publicly in real time, and use the findings to establish a baseline for reform. - All contracts would be publicly posted before bidding, with unions and small businesses specifically notified so they have a real shot at winning work — keeping money in local economies. - She frames transparency as a cultural posture, not just a procedural one: politicians should own their mistakes publicly the same way she tries to as a candidate. - The Secretary of State’s office is inherently nonpartisan in function — no hot-button policy decisions — which makes it, in her view, the ideal place to model what responsive, ethical government looks like. 0:10:09 - Q: What new supports or resources would you provide to county clerks? - Every county has different needs; Potter would start by visiting and listening before prescribing solutions. - HAVA grants — which she says stopped flowing to counties like Morgan and Monroe under Diego Morales — would be restored to fund voter education, poll workers, and equipment. - She would ensure all Secretary of State staff are certified notaries to prevent the kind of filing paperwork failures the office has already experienced, and would push county clerks’ offices to maintain notaries on staff as well. 0:11:39 - Q: What would you do to make elections safer? - Potter notes that “election security” means different things to different voters — some fear voter intimidation (including ICE presence at polls), others worry about vote-counting integrity — and that the office should speak to both concerns. - Her primary prescription is transparency through education: live demonstrations of how voting machines work, YouTube videos, and clear explainers on the bipartisan inspector system already in place at every polling site. - By and large, Indiana elections are safe — the problem is a lack of public understanding, which creates a noise environment that bad-faith actors exploit. 0:13:28 - Q (viewer): Diego Morales hired family members. How should the hiring process work in your office? - No family members, period — and no cronyism either. All open positions would be publicly posted. - She would retain long-serving career staff who do good work and aren’t responsible for Morales’s decisions; they deserve credit for doing their jobs under difficult circumstances. - Hiring decisions would incorporate public feedback on what qualities people want to see in office staff. 0:14:52 - Q (viewer): What steps would you take to increase civic engagement for working families, seniors, and young voters in communities like Johnson County? - The ballot book addresses all of these groups: comprehensive, accessible, optionally mailed — and would include civics basics like how to become a precinct chair, what a township trustee does, and how to run for office. - For seniors and homebound voters, Potter supports opt-in permanent absentee ballot enrollment — once you opt in, you receive a ballot every election without re-applying — and would publicize travel board options for those who want in-person assistance. - She flags the shift from neighborhood polling locations to consolidated vote centers as a specific barrier for voters without cars, and says county-level needs must be assessed individually. - Johnson County lacks adequately handicap-accessible polling locations — a concrete local example of gaps the office should identify and address. 0:18:08 - Q (viewer): What are your plans for the work environment inside the Secretary of State’s office? - Potter would begin with an internal listening tour — asking current staff about culture, morale, and unmet needs before making changes. - She would review and update the employee handbook, which she suspects is outdated, and clear out anyone who’s incompatible or checked out. - Requiring all office staff to be certified notaries would eliminate a specific operational vulnerability that caused problems with filing paperwork under the current administration. - The goal is a nonpartisan, impartial, psychologically safe workplace — because politics can be uncomfortable, and staff need to be able to do their jobs without pressure. 0:20:06 - Q: Tell us more about the proposed statewide voter guidebook — what’s in it and how does it reach every Hoosier? - Beyond candidate listings, the book would include party platforms, how to become a precinct chair or delegate, what a township trustee does, how to file as an independent candidate, and county party contact information for all parties. - Candidates would have space for a brief (roughly 500-700 character) nonpartisan self-description, a website link, and social media handles — and any candidate who refuses to fill it out gets “candidate chose not to respond,” which Potter says speaks for its… Get full access to Progressive Indiana Network at www.progressiveindiana.net/subscribe

    Virtual Town Hall w/ Blythe Potter for Secretary of State

  6. May 4

    Virtual Town Hall w/ Dr. Tim Peck

    https://progressiveindiana.net https://timpeckforcongress.com/ SUMMARY: With Indiana’s May 5th primary two days out, the Progressive Indiana Network hosted its final virtual town hall of the primary season, featuring Dr. Tim Peck, emergency physician and Democratic candidate for Indiana’s 9th Congressional District. Peck, who lost the 2024 general election to Republican incumbent Erin Houchin, is making his second run for the seat covering Indiana’s 18 southeastern counties. Over the course of the hour, Peck made the case for a grassroots, no-corporate-PAC campaign rooted in his medical experience, discussing healthcare affordability, the Supreme Court, AI and data centers, the Fifth Circuit’s mifepristone ruling, bipartisan dealmaking, and his evolving view of corporations — closing with a pitch for why this cycle is different from 2024 and how viewers can join his movement before Tuesday. Progressive Indiana Network is subscriber-supported independent media. To help us continue doing this work, please consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. IN DEPTH: 00:00:21 Opening Remarks - Scott introduces the show as PIN’s final virtual town hall of the primary season, two days before the May 5th primary - Peck thanks Scott for the work PIN does to bring educated voters to the polls and introduces himself as an emergency physician living on a farm in Clark County, across the river from Louisville - Peck frames his campaign around a door-knocking encounter: a constituent who told him “it costs too much to go to work,” citing gas, credit card interest, housing, childcare, student debt, and healthcare premiums - Peck notes that only six of IN-9’s 18 counties can deliver babies, calling the district a microcosm of rural healthcare collapse - Peck says he has sworn off all corporate PAC money and has built a movement of 1,000 volunteers who have knocked over 10,000 doors 00:06:02 Viewer Question (Sarah, web form): Will you accept corporate PAC money, and how do you guard against taking it indirectly through leadership PACs? - Peck says he signed on with roughly 70 candidates nationwide to a pledge covering term limits, no individual stock trading, no corporate PAC money, Supreme Court ethics transparency, and a five-year post-office lobbying moratorium - Peck defines his pledge broadly: he also refuses dark money PACs and money from Democratic incumbents who themselves take corporate PAC money — including declining a check offer from Rep. Andre Carson - Peck argues that taking corporate PAC money creates a structural conflict of interest: when Chase Bank calls, you cancel your constituent meeting; without that money, you don’t - Peck says the national Democratic Party — including the progressive wing — has abandoned Indiana, which actually gives him freedom to run the campaign Hoosiers deserve rather than one dictated by national party strategy 00:12:03 Viewer Question (Christine, YouTube): What type of Democrat do you consider yourself? - Peck calls himself a left-of-center Democrat with progressive ideals who is willing to work with those who don’t share all of them — distinguishing that from moderation - Peck says labels obscure more than they reveal; he knocked on a door that same day belonging to a union worker with a Trump yard sign who voted for Trump three times and is now unhappy with him - Peck argues that working with Republicans isn’t ideological compromise but legislative strategy: there is bipartisan support for things like the PRO Act that simply never gets to the floor because Mike Johnson blocks it - Scott offers “pragmatic progressive” as a label; Peck says he’ll take it 00:16:13 What do we do about the Supreme Court? - Peck opposes court expansion, calling it the nuclear option — like eliminating the filibuster, it only empowers whoever holds power at the moment - Peck’s path forward: pass Amy Klobuchar’s anti-mid-decade gerrymandering bill, enact binding Supreme Court ethics legislation, win the presidency to appoint new justices, and use impeachment only once ethics laws are in place and being violated - Peck says he does not support using impeachment for messaging purposes, but that Clarence Thomas, Sam Alito, and John Roberts cannot be impeached yet because Congress has not yet passed the ethics laws that would make their conduct clearly illegal - Peck frames the long game: chip away at the structural damage, neutralize the court over time, and focus on winning elections rather than procedural shortcuts 00:22:04 How do you tackle healthcare affordability and get toward universal coverage? - Peck believes healthcare is a human right but does not think Medicare for All is achievable now, and argues Medicare itself has serious flaws: no dental, vision, or hearing coverage; 20% of recipients still carry medical debt; no long-term care coverage; and lengthy ICU stays can bankrupt patients - Peck’s plan centers on weakening insurance monopolies through antitrust enforcement: UnitedHealth owns Optum (a physician network), nursing homes, pharmacy benefit managers, and NP groups — Aetna and CVS have merged similarly - Peck wants to haul insurance executives before Congress and demand an accounting of how much Medicare payroll tax money went to executive bonuses and shareholder payouts - Peck calls for banning prior authorization (an insurance company making a medical decision) and eliminating pharmacy benefit managers, which he says extract money from the system with no added value — both have bipartisan support - Peck argues that Citizens United is the real obstacle to full Medicare for All; until corporate money is out of politics, the insurance industry has too much power to be displaced entirely 00:32:21 Viewer Question (Anonymous, web form): Your career has ties to Sam Altman of OpenAI and Joe Lonsdale of Palantir. Your FEC filings show a $2,000 donation from Brian Bloom, VP of Millennium hedge fund. Will your votes on AI and tech policy protect Hoosier working families or will your industry connections sway you? - Peck says the Bloom donation came from a childhood friend who is a Democrat, not from Millennium as an institution - Peck focuses on data centers as the most immediate AI policy question: deals are being struck in backrooms, contracts signed, and only then is the public invited to discuss — he calls this insane and in need of regulation - Peck draws a parallel to Indiana’s casino licensing process, where communities had robust public input and could negotiate community benefits (schools, libraries, a YMCA) before deals closed — data centers should work the same way - Peck says he is directly affected: a massive Facebook data center is being built in Clark County, his home county, and he has no meaningful say over its electricity or water consumption 00:38:10 Viewer Question (Anonymous, web form): You suggested people use ChatGPT to vet candidates. Where do you stand on AI use and responsible guardrails? - Peck says he recommended ChatGPT because voters are uninformed — he knocked on doors during early voting and met people who had already cast a ballot without knowing who they voted for in his race; any research tool is better than none, but he stressed using the cited references - Peck says the incumbent, Erin Houchin, sits on tech and crypto policy committees while taking heavy money from Silicon Valley VCs and voting for maximum deregulation — he wants the opposite - Peck argues AI should be treated like nuclear energy: even when driven by private industry, technologies that pose existential risks require public ownership of the decision-making process - Peck says AI development needs to be slowed down and subjected to the same kind of public discourse and regulatory guardrails applied to other civilization-scale technologies 00:43:06 Viewer Question (Ruth, web form): The Fifth Circuit just ruled mifepristone cannot be sent by mail. Does this improve patient safety? - Peck flatly says no — the “patient safety” rationale from the court is false; mifepristone is a very … Get full access to Progressive Indiana Network at www.progressiveindiana.net/subscribe

    Virtual Town Hall w/ Dr. Tim Peck

  7. Apr 25

    Indiana's 9th Congressional District Democratic Primary Debate

    Produced by: Progressive Indiana Network: https:/www.progressiveindiana.net Moderator: Kacey Blundell: https://hoosierwomenforward.org/kacey-blundell/ Candidates: Brad Meyer: https://bradmeyer.org/ Tim Peck: https://timpeckforcongress.com/ Keil Roark: https://www.keilroark.com/ Jim Graham was invited but unable to attend due to a scheduling conflict. SUMMARY: Progressive Indiana Network hosted the final primary debate of the 2026 cycle for Indiana’s 9th Congressional District, moderated by Kacey Blundell. Three candidates participated: Dr. Tim Peck, an emergency medicine physician from New Washington; Brad Meyer, a former manufacturing leader from Bloomington; and Keil Roark, a licensed electrical engineer, Navy veteran, and former UAW assembly line worker. A fourth candidate, Jim Graham, was invited but declined citing a scheduling conflict. The debate covered 11 questions across a broad range of policy areas -- including the cost of living, healthcare, education, infrastructure, immigration, data centers, and government accountability -- followed by a 15-question lightning round exposing intra-party fault lines, and closing statements from each candidate. Peck ran on a platform of rejecting corporate PAC money, reducing healthcare costs by eliminating middlemen and directing Medicare dollars to patient care, and labor-first infrastructure policy. Meyer advocated for a $20 minimum wage, Medicare for All, and a structural progressive overhaul of the economy. Roark positioned himself as the pragmatic, electable candidate, focused on ACA subsidies, a $15 minimum wage, and appealing to disaffected Republicans. Progressive Indiana Network is powered entirely by our subscribers. To help us continue presenting special events like this, please consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. BREAKDOWN: 00:00:23 Welcome and Introductions - Blundell introduces the debate and PIN, explains the format, and welcomes the three candidates. - A fourth candidate, Jim Graham, was invited but could not attend due to a scheduling conflict. - Opening statement order determined by random draw: Peck first, then Meyer, then Roark. 00:03:21 Opening Statements - Peck introduces himself as an emergency medicine physician who co-led a bipartisan coalition to expand telemedicine ahead of the pandemic, frames the central problem as “it costs too much to work,” and pledges to accept no corporate PAC money. - Meyer highlights 25 years in manufacturing leadership, calls for a $20 minimum wage, Medicare for All, and the first $20,000 in earnings tax-free, and argues Democrats lose by softening their message. - Roark introduces himself as a Purdue-educated electrical engineer, Navy officer, and former UAW assembly line worker, calls for a $15 minimum wage and ACA subsidy restoration as pragmatic near-term priorities, and frames himself as the electable candidate in a conservative district. 00:09:43 Q1: What is your top priority for residents of Indiana’s 9th Congressional District, and how do you plan to achieve that? Keil Roark - Prioritizes reinstating ACA subsidies, passing a minimum wage increase, and repealing the “big, beautiful bill” to restore SNAP and Medicaid funding. - Also called for a No Stock Trade Act to prohibit members of Congress from trading on insider information, and Supreme Court ethics reform. Brad Meyer - Top priorities: stabilize the ACA and rural health care system, and enforce the Impoundment Act to compel the executive branch to spend congressionally allocated funds. - Called for impeachment proceedings against Trump for the Iran war and for gutting federal programs in violation of law. Tim Peck - Focused on the “costs too much to work” problem he hears at the doors: gas, housing, childcare, groceries, education debt, and health insurance all consume more than a paycheck provides. - Proposed restoring war powers, first-time homebuyer assistance to compete with private equity, universal pre-K, grocery price gouging investigations, lower student loan interest rates, and reversing the big, beautiful bill’s ACA cuts. 00:15:56 Q2: How would you address rising costs of living, including housing, groceries, and health care for families in this district? Brad Meyer - Proposed $20/hour minimum wage, raising the non-exempt salary threshold to $100,000 for overtime purposes, and making the first $20,000 earned tax-free. - Advocated for Medicare for All to reduce medical debt bankruptcies, ending corporate speculation in single-family housing, building more housing supply, and helping first-time buyers with down payments. - Also called for stabilizing Social Security. Tim Peck - Identified corporate PAC money as the root cause -- arguing that business interests now control government, citing the current congresswoman’s Duke Energy record as a specific example. - Proposed leveling the tax code between corporations and individuals: credit card interest rates, PE firm housing tax rates, and ACA premium taxation all favor corporations over working people. Keil Roark - Framed housing as primarily a supply problem stemming from the post-2008 construction slowdown, calling for tax incentives for development, low-interest loans for first-time buyers, and anti-monopoly cost controls on predatory developers. - Tied grocery prices to fertilizer costs elevated by war, and argued ACA subsidy restoration would cut average monthly health care costs by roughly 25%. 00:21:59 Q3: What is your stance on public safety and criminal justice reform, and what specific policies would you support? Tim Peck - Supports funding police while also addressing the root causes that produce crime. Described a real incident from the night before -- a middle schooler waving a gun outside a high school dance in Salem -- as emblematic of the problem. - Called for background checks, safe storage requirements, red flag laws, school-based mental health and conflict resolution, and access restrictions for those who should not have firearms. Brad Meyer - Framed the issue as reactive (policing and courts) versus proactive (addressing poverty and lack of hope). - Criticized the country’s failures on mental health, addiction policy, and recidivism -- noting that roughly half of those released from prison reoffend. - Called for body cameras and federal oversight to rebuild community trust, and argued the federal government’s retreat from consent decrees has made things worse. Keil Roark - Emphasized the direct link between unemployment and crime: good-paying jobs reduce recidivism. - Called for upgraded police recruiting, training, and federal grants to struggling departments; eliminating cash bond for nonviolent offenders; and better in-prison vocational training to reduce reoffending. 00:28:19 Q4: How do you plan to support small businesses and economic growth in the suburban and rural parts of the district? Tim Peck - Argued that rural infrastructure is the prerequisite: broadband, transportation links, local hospitals, and schools must exist before small businesses can survive. - Described his own community’s situation -- local hospital closed, fiber internet only recently arrived, limited transport to urban centers -- as the lived reality of rural economic hollowing. Keil Roark - Drew on his own blue-collar background in construction to argue for protecting small business tax deductions for equipment, materials, and operating costs. - Called for working with local mayors and county leaders to identify specific infrastructure and economic development needs, then targeting tax incentives accordingly. Brad Meyer - Outlined four steps: reduce barriers to starting businesses (limit non-competes, pass Medicare for All to decouple health insurance from employment); strengthen the local economy through minimum wage and overtime policy; expand capital through the Small Business Administration; and invest in broadband, infrastructure, and workforce development. - Noted that Kentucky receives roughly twice Indiana’s federal funding, and called that a failure of congressional repres… Get full access to Progressive Indiana Network at www.progressiveindiana.net/subscribe

    Indiana's 9th Congressional District Democratic Primary Debate

  8. Apr 24

    Indiana's 6th Congressional District Democratic Primary Debate

    Produced by: Progressive Indiana Network: https:/www.progressiveindiana.net Moderator: Scott Aaron Rogers: https://www.hoosleft.us Candidates: William Kory Amyx: https://amyxforcongress.com/ Nick Baker: https://electnickbaker.com/ Cinde Wirth: https://wirth4congress.com/ David Boyd was invited and and confirmed but pulled out of this debate citing to a scheduling conflict. SUMMARY: Progressive Indiana Network hosted a Democratic primary debate for Indiana’s 6th Congressional District, featuring moderator Scott Aaron Rogers and candidates William Kory Amyx, Nick Baker, and Dr. Cinde Wirth. A fourth candidate, David Boyd, was invited and confirmed but withdrew citing a scheduling conflict. The debate covered ten questions on foreign policy, technology accountability, immigration, affordability, healthcare, education, human rights, taxation, social security, and labor, followed by a fifteen-question speed round and closing statements. The candidates showed clear ideological distinctions throughout, particularly on healthcare — with Amyx and Wirth supporting universal single-payer and Baker advocating a public option — and on immigration, where Amyx and Wirth called for abolishing ICE and Baker opposed that position. The speed round revealed unanimous agreement on several issues including data center moratoriums, DC and Puerto Rico statehood, abolishing the Electoral College, cannabis legalization, FISA reauthorization, impeaching Trump, and opposing Hakeem Jeffries for Speaker, while the candidates split on an assault weapons ban, student debt cancellation, free higher education, and abolishing the federal death penalty. Progressive Indiana Network is powered entirely by our subscribers. To help us continue presenting special events like this, please consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. BREAKDOWN: 00:00:22 Opening and introductions - Scott Aaron Rogers opens the debate on behalf of Progressive Indiana Network, introducing the 6th Congressional District race. - Candidates introduced: William Kory Amyx, Nick Baker, and Dr. Cinde Wirth; David Boyd was invited and confirmed but withdrew at the last minute citing a scheduling conflict. - Format outlined: two-minute opening statements, ten questions with 90-second responses, a fifteen-question speed round, and closing statements. 00:02:49 Opening statements - Amyx leads, citing 23,000 doors knocked across 11 counties and a focus on affordability, healthcare, education, public safety, and economic dignity. - Baker follows (order swapped due to technical difficulties with Wirth), highlighting his Camp Lejeune Supreme Court case, a push for a balanced budget through healthcare reform, and an argument that he is the most electable candidate in a conservative district. - Wirth closes, introducing herself as a seventh-generation 6th District resident, public school teacher, small business owner, and PhD scientist, and citing her 2022 run against Greg Pence as proof of her commitment to the district. 00:08:10 Q1: Separation of powers and the war with Iran - Rogers frames the question around the Iran war, sweeping tariff authority, and the revival of impoundment powers, asking what each candidate would do to reassert congressional authority and what their position is on the war. - Baker calls the war illegal and unconstitutional, argues for winning back the House majority to challenge executive overreach through legislation. - Amyx proposes replacing the War Powers Resolution with a modern version requiring affirmative congressional authorization within 30 days, automatic funding cutoffs for unauthorized hostilities, congressional approval windows for tariffs, and reform of the National Emergencies Act. - Wirth argues Congress members who took an oath to defend the Constitution have a duty to hold domestic enemies accountable, and calls for restoring the State Department’s professional diplomatic corps to end the Iran conflict. 00:15:12 Q2: Tech accountability and Section 230 - Rogers uses the discovery of a network of online chat groups called “Rape Academy” with an estimated 62 million members as the entry point for a question on platform liability and Section 230 reform. - Amyx calls for full repeal of Section 230 and introduces two pieces of draft legislation: the Real Identity Integrity Act (tokenized logins to verify identity while preserving anonymity) and the Digital Integrity and Algorithmic Accountability Act (algorithmic transparency requirements). - Wirth draws on her classroom experience with cyberbullying, calls for guardrails on big tech, and argues the root problem is money blocking legislation that has been proposed repeatedly over 15 years. - Baker calls Silicon Valley the “Wild West,” applauds a New Mexico verdict against Meta for hosting child predators, references Indiana’s Haley’s Law, and cautions against regulation that tips into censorship. 00:21:32 Q3: Immigration and ICE - Rogers frames the question around the removal of DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, ICE shootings of U.S. citizens, and a Democratic base that increasingly supports abolishing ICE. - Wirth states she called for abolishing ICE last summer and co-organized an anti-ICE rally at Johnson County Park in Atterbury; she supports retaining professional Customs and Border Protection at ports of entry while eliminating ICE entirely. - Baker opposes full abolishment, arguing ICE can be returned to how it functioned under Clinton and Obama — deporting people lawfully without the abuses of the current administration; warns that “abolish ICE” messaging will cost votes in a conservative district. - Amyx introduces his Unity Pathway Act: provisional legal status for undocumented individuals, a pathway to a green card after five years, and replacement of ICE with a new Immigration Enforcement Service refocused on trafficking networks, cartel operations, and violent criminals rather than families and workers. 00:28:20 Q4: Affordability - Rogers presses all three on the affordability crisis, noting that “we’ll lower costs” is a talking point, not a policy, and asking for root causes and specific solutions. - Amyx cites real wage data (3.3% price increases vs. 0.3% real hourly earnings growth in March), and outlines a structural approach: raise wages with small business offsets, universal healthcare to cut costs, expand housing supply, and treat child care as an economic investment. - Baker points to insurance as the largest inflationary metric — with profits up fourfold while premiums rose 10-21% — and argues for reforming healthcare overhead, returning tax revenue to communities, and raising the minimum wage. - Wirth argues Medicare for All would give every family an effective lift of approximately $24,000 through 2-3% administrative overhead, calls for CEO pay accountability, enforcement of antitrust laws, and investment in 50 million affordable housing units. 00:34:30 Q5: Healthcare - Rogers uses a direct Baker quote from a Hancock County forum — “I would love the dream of universal healthcare to come true, but I don’t think right now it’s a workable solution” — to open a deeper discussion on how each candidate would get to their preferred healthcare system. - Baker clarifies he does not support propping up the ACA, which he calls broken, and instead supports a public option he describes as “Medicare for More” — leaving a capitalistic private market open while eliminating administrative waste; he says universal healthcare would require a two-thirds congressional majority. - Wirth cites polling showing over 70% of Americans support single-payer in some form, advocates a phased-in approach funded through payroll taxes and a wealth tax on investment gains, and proposes job transition programs for insurance industry workers displaced by the change. - Amyx agrees with Wirth that preventative care is critical, supports universal healthcare but opposes a sudden transition that could “crush” rural hospitals, and calls for phased implementation with Medicare negotiating drug prices, cap… Get full access to Progressive Indiana Network at www.progressiveindiana.net/subscribe

    Indiana's 6th Congressional District Democratic Primary Debate
See All (27)

About

PIN special events: debates, town halls, collaborations. www.progressiveindiana.net

Information