L E S S O N S - with Lennox Saint

Lennox Saint

$32,700 in savings. 10 months of runway. non-technical founder building a real SaaS to $10K/month using only AI tools - or going broke trying. this playlist is my full journey from $1,940 MRR to $10K MRR, filmed in real time with real numbers. the wins. the f**k-ups and the dollars. no code experience. no safety net. just AI tools and a deadline. new videos every week. subscribe to see how it ends.

  1. 5d ago

    i gave GPT-6 Astra and Fable 5.1 the same video to edit

    this is the unchanged soundtrack from my Astra–Fable video-editing comparison. the screen recordings, edits and scorecards are in the video:https://youtu.be/fYuok6zOlPo i gave GPT-6 Astra and Fable 5.1 the same video and two rounds of prompts. each made three Shorts and three long edits. then i added my own long edit and scored all 13. i want to hand an AI a recording, go away, and come back to a finished video. so i checked how much nudging each model needed, then watched what it actually made. watch the edits before the reveal and tell me which one you'd keep. include the cut number so i can find it. these are my personal scores from this experiment. the AI labels were hidden during scoring, but i recognised my own edit. the human entry only competes in the long-form results. this doesn't prove AGI or that an AI can replace every editor. the scorecards use the saved ratings. where a spoken number differs, the on-screen correction shows it. the original contestant clips keep their own pacing, sound and mistakes. 00:00 one recording, 13 edits00:30 the prompts and first attempts01:21 round two: asking both models to improve02:48 blind edit reviews04:52 the long-form edits08:19 the last three edits09:57 scores and the final verdict10:58 what should i test next? music:Slowly by Tokyo Music Walker | https://soundcloud.com/user-356546060Royalty Free Music by https://www.free-stock-music.comCreative Commons / Attribution 3.0 Unported License (CC BY 3.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.en_US Music excerpted and mixed beneath narration.

  2. Sep 8

    OpenAI's new internal model is getting ridiculous

    OpenAI says its next-generation internal model helped solve the Navier-Stokes Millennium Prize Problem. Around 10,000 coordinating agents. 88 hours. I wanted to understand what that means without needing a maths degree. I walk through the announcement, the vortex, and a plain-English explanation from GPT-6 Astra. Then I give my take on what this could mean for AI and scientific discovery. Watch the video: https://youtu.be/LlAoO5AErJU CHAPTERS 0:00 OpenAI’s new maths claim 0:29 The internal model beyond GPT-6 Astra 1:09 10,000 agents and 88 hours 2:00 How the agents worked together 2:41 Tokens and the hypothetical cost 3:36 Why OpenAI won’t claim the prize 4:39 Navier-Stokes in plain English 6:06 Five details worth knowing 6:53 My take on AI and discovery SOURCE OpenAI’s announcement, with links to the paper and Lean proof: https://openai.com/index/navier-stokes-solution/ CLARIFICATIONS The $15M and $6.5M figures in this video are hypothetical output-token price comparisons, not OpenAI’s reported spending. $15M refers to all attempted problems; $6.5M refers to Navier-Stokes alone under the pricing assumption discussed. My later references to “spent $15M” overstate what is known. The concurrent Alpöge/Buckmaster result concerned forced Euler, a different result. My imagined rivalry dialogue is speculation, not a reported exchange. “AGI” is my interpretation, not an established conclusion from this result. The thumbnail vortex is an illustration.

About

$32,700 in savings. 10 months of runway. non-technical founder building a real SaaS to $10K/month using only AI tools - or going broke trying. this playlist is my full journey from $1,940 MRR to $10K MRR, filmed in real time with real numbers. the wins. the f**k-ups and the dollars. no code experience. no safety net. just AI tools and a deadline. new videos every week. subscribe to see how it ends.