Scientists Free From Religion

Jorge Guerra Pires, Ph.D.

This publication is dedicated to scientists and thinkers exploring the frontiers where science and religion intersect—and sometimes clash. Here, we dive into what science can explain, question, and support in areas traditionally dominated by religious beliefs. Our content highlights evidence-based perspectives on origins, morality, and existence, encouraging a rational, secular approach to understanding the natural world. We focus on how scientific discoveries and methods challenge, redefine, or refute common religious narratives. Whether you're a scientist without religious affiliation or a curious mind interested in objective inquiry, this is a space for rigorous analysis and thoughtful discussion.

Episodes

  1. 3d ago

    Sam Harris: Science can determine human values

    Sources: "Blood Feud: Moral Judgment and Tradition": A dialogue containing direct excerpts from the introduction of Sam Harris's book, focusing on the Albanian Kanun and the initial argument for a science of well-being."Hume, Facts and Values in Science": A discussion regarding the "Humean Guillotine" (the is-ought distinction) and how modern scientific perspectives, like those of Harris, challenge this separation."Book Reading in Blocks": Extensive conversation logs providing original text from the introduction and subsequent discussions on the definitions of moral relativism and its history."Moral Realism Against Emotivism": Chat excerpts specifically analyzing how Harris responds to non-cognitivist positions and positions himself as a moral realist."Moral Relativism and Science": An essay and discussion about the humanitarian costs of moral relativism and Harris's contribution to treating morality as a factual domain."Resuming Book Reading": Continued direct excerpts from the book, dealing with the consensus between religious conservatives and secular liberals regarding values."Sam Harris and Morality" (Sam Harris e a moralidade.pdf): A PDF document authored by Jorge Guerra Pires, providing a synthesized defense of objective morality based on Harris's work."The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values": The primary source, book (2010).With mention to the Pope interest in AI With reference to my book AI by Sci fi This publication focus on atheism, but with a scientific touch. Learn more We are on Spotify.

  2. 4d ago

    Philippa Foot: Good and evil are biological facts

    Primary Sources Foot, Philippa. Natural Goodness. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001.Pires, Jorge Guerra. "Philippa Foot: The Architect of Secular Morality and Realism without God." Published in Medium (Atheist Mindset).Dialogue Records (Gemini Chat). Transcripts including "Foot: Morality, Reason and Nature" and "Philippa Foot: Objective Secular Morality".Key Authors and Works Cited in the Sources The sources reference several philosophers and foundational works essential to the development of Philippa Foot's thought and the broader debate in moral philosophy: Anscombe, G. E. M.: Extensively cited for her influence on Foot, particularly for her essays "Modern Moral Philosophy" (1958), "On Promising and its Justice," "Intention," "Rules, Rights and Promises," and "The Two Kinds of Error in Action".Aquinas, St. Thomas: Referenced for his teleological structure and the distinction between rational choice and animal instinct in the Summa Theologica.Aristotle: His work Nicomachean Ethics serves as the foundation for Foot's revival of naturalism and biological teleology.Foot, Philippa: Seminal essays such as "Morality as a System of Hypothetical Imperatives" (1972), "Moral Beliefs" (1958), and the collection Virtues and Vices and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy (1978).Geach, Peter: Cited for the article "Good and Evil" (1956), which is essential for the distinction between attributive and predicative adjectives.Hume, David: Discussed primarily through A Treatise of Human Nature and An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals, specifically regarding the "practicality requirement" and "Hume's Guillotine".Kant, Immanuel: Referenced for his Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals and the theory of categorical imperatives, which are central targets of Foot's critique.Moore, G. E.: Cited for Principia Ethica (1903) and his defense of non-naturalism.Quinn, Warren: His book Morality and Action, including the essays "Putting Rationality in its Place" and "Rationality and the Human Good," is noted as a crucial influence on Foot's later shift in position.Thompson, Michael: His article "The Representation of Life" is the source for the discussion on "Aristotelian categoricals" and the description of life forms.Wittgenstein, Ludwig: Referenced for his Philosophical Investigations and his advice on bringing words back from their metaphysical use to their everyday use.Additionally, the sources mention dialogues and debates with other prominent thinkers, including Bernard Williams, Christine Korsgaard, John McDowell, A. J. Ayer, C. L. Stevenson, R. M. Hare, and Friedrich Nietzsche. With mention to the Pope interest in AI With reference to my book AI by Sci fi This publication focus on atheism, but with a scientific touch. Learn more We are on Spotify.

About

This publication is dedicated to scientists and thinkers exploring the frontiers where science and religion intersect—and sometimes clash. Here, we dive into what science can explain, question, and support in areas traditionally dominated by religious beliefs. Our content highlights evidence-based perspectives on origins, morality, and existence, encouraging a rational, secular approach to understanding the natural world. We focus on how scientific discoveries and methods challenge, redefine, or refute common religious narratives. Whether you're a scientist without religious affiliation or a curious mind interested in objective inquiry, this is a space for rigorous analysis and thoughtful discussion.