The Jeremy Boreing Show

Boreing Media

America isn’t over, but plenty of people are eager to write its obituary.  Jeremy Boreing isn’t one of them.  On The Jeremy Boreing Show, the Daily Wire co-founder, filmmaker, and entrepreneur sits down with the builders and dreamers, the newsmakers and the troublemakers shaping the future of the country.  Leave behind the politics of despair and reclaim your agency from those who would rule over you. The future belongs to those who build it.

  1. 6h ago

    The "Heritage American" Movement Is Wrong — Here's Why | Ep. 41

    The Supreme Court just ruled in Trump v. Barbara that children born on U.S. soil to parents here illegally or temporarily are citizens at birth — upholding the standard set in 1898's Wong Kim Ark and striking down the 2025 executive order that tried to change it. The vote split the Court, Clarence Thomas filed a 91-page dissent, and Justice Alito warned the ruling could seriously affect the country's future. But the legal question the Court just settled is smaller than the philosophical one still tearing up the internet, the right, and the country underneath it: what actually makes someone American? This episode traces that question from the messy realities of the founding — a Naturalization Act that limited citizenship to "free white persons," a Catholic signer of the Declaration despite the founders' deep suspicion of Rome, a Jewish immigrant named Haym Salomon who personally financed Washington's army at Yorktown — through the waves of Irish, German, and Italian immigration that reshaped the country each time without breaking it. It examines the current backlash on the left, using Minnesota's Somali immigrant population and Dearborn, Michigan's Islamic majority as case studies in citizenship without assimilation. And it takes seriously the newer challenge from the right: the rise of "Heritage American" rhetoric, the viral "How American Are You?" ancestry chart, and dissident-right figures like Charles Cornish-Dale (Raw Egg Nationalist), C. Jay Engel, and others arguing that bloodline — not belief — is the true measure of belonging. The episode argues neither side has it right. A nation can't survive as a pure abstraction with no people actually living it out — but it also can't be reduced to bloodline, especially in a country where, as the episode notes, almost nobody has an actual unbroken, undiluted lineage to point to. Drawing on Lincoln's Gettysburg Address, G.K. Chesterton's observation that America is "the only nation in the world founded on a creed," and biblical models of covenant and assimilation — Ruth binding herself to Naomi's people, Paul's image of the wild branch grafted into a new root, Isaiah's terms for the foreigner who joins himself to the covenant — the episode makes the case that American identity has always been a covenant entered into, not a coupon handed out or a bloodline inherited. It also covers Justice Thomas's dissent in detail, including his argument that the 14th Amendment rightly secured citizenship for freedmen because they had genuine belonging, not just presence — and closes with a look at the Trump administration's historic denaturalization campaign, which aims to file more than 20 times the historical annual average of denaturalization cases this year alone. If you've watched the birthright citizenship debate, the Heritage American discourse, or the fight over what "America First" actually means and felt like both sides were missing something, this episode is the corrective. 00:00 Do You Have to Be White to Be American? 03:47 The Supreme Court Just Ruled on Citizenship 05:15 Every Nation Decides Who Counts as Its Own 07:31 America Was Never Built by One Kind of Person 10:37 The Jew Who Financed the Revolution 13:14 20 Million Immigrants, One Nation 16:07 Citizenship: A Covenant or a Coupon? 18:43 The Minnesota and Dearborn Warning Signs 24:23 The Right's Plan to Deport 120 Million 35:00 So What Is an American?

    44 min

  2. 1d ago

    Birthright Citizenship, the Declaration, and Fighting for American Exceptionalism | Weds LIVE Ep. 40

    America turns 250 this year, and the arguments about what this country actually is — and whether it's worth keeping — are coming from every direction at once. Jeremy opens with the Supreme Court's ruling on birthright citizenship and the Fourteenth Amendment, then traces it back to a deeper question: what did the founders actually risk when they signed the Declaration of Independence, and what does America owe them 250 years later? Jeremy is joined by a panel built for exactly this moment: Eric Metaxas — NYT bestselling author of Revolution: The Birth of the Greatest Nation in the History of the World — makes the case that the American founding was the only genuine revolution in an age of so-called revolutions, and walks through what the moral character of men like Washington and Adams actually cost them. John West — VP of the Discovery Institute and author of Endowed by Our Creator — defends the Declaration of Independence against attacks from both the 1619 Project left and the dissident right's rejection of America as a "creedal nation," and unpacks what "Laws of Nature and of Nature's God" meant to the founders. Rick Green — America's Constitution Coach and founder of Patriot Academy — brings the civic-action lane: why self-government requires virtue, why virtue requires biblical formation, and what ordinary Americans can actually do to keep the republic. The conversation covers American exceptionalism, the Constitution under attack, the Supreme Court's birthright citizenship ruling and immigration, the growing rejection of the American founding from both the radical left and corners of the dissident right — including the fight over the term "Judeo-Christian" and whether America is a creed or a bloodline — and closes on where real hope for the next 250 years comes from. If you care about the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, American exceptionalism, and the fight over what this country actually is, this is the conversation for July 4th, 2026. 0:00 Monologue: What the Birthright Citizenship Ruling Really Asks 5:39 Meet the Panel: Metaxas, West & Green on the Founding 8:25 Is the American Revolution the Only One That Worked? 10:37 Chesterton's Insight: America as a Creed 15:26 Are We a Bloodline, a Place, or an Idea? 18:48 Is "It's Not a Value Judgment" a Cop-Out? 30:50 Naming the "Emerging Right" 36:12 Culture, Self-Government & the Immigration Debate 43:57 UFC, Patriot Academy & Reaching Gen Z 50:10 God-Given Rights vs. Government-Granted Rights 55:54 Is "Christian Nation" a Loaded Term? 1:00:04 Defining Christian Nationalism and "Globohomo" 1:03:26 Jefferson's "Alter or Abolish" Explained 1:10:09 Survey Data: Reasons Not to Despair 1:16:34 The Hard Work Ahead — and the Danger of Utopian Despair 1:26:10 Defending the Founders Without Excusing Slavery 1:36:45 Why Particular Men and Places Still Matter 1:44:03 Real Heroes, Caesar Rodney & Washington's Troops 1:54:12 Closing: Go See the Declaration Before It Fades

    2h 5m

  3. 2d ago

    A Former Muslim Exposes Tucker's Lie About Islam | Ep 39 w/ Danny Burmawi

    Why Tucker Carlson is wrong about Islam and Israel — a former Muslim breaks down the false narratives reshaping the dissident right. Danny Burmawi, CEO of the Ideological Defense Institute and author of 'Islam, Israel and the West,' explains the 14-century history of Islamic conquest, the dhimmi system, the red-green alliance, Mamdani, and why anti-Semitism and Islamophobia are not the same. If you want long-form conversations that take ideas seriously, subscribe — it's the best way to make sure you don't miss an episode. Jeremy Boreing sits down with Burmawi for a wide-ranging conversation on Islam vs. the West, Tucker Carlson's guests on Islam, the conversion that took him from devout Muslim to Christian, what really happens to apostates under Islamic law, and whether the Gulf states are truly more tolerant of Christians than Israel. 00:00 - Is Islam a Better Friend Than Israel? 01:31 - How Tucker's Guests Lie About Islam 02:56 - The 14 Centuries of Conquest 05:24 - The Blood Tax and the Stolen Churches 07:21 - Why a Cartoon Made Him Devout 11:28 - The Day He Read the Quran for Real 13:24 - What Happens When You Leave Islam 01:54:27 - Why It's 'Islamophobia,' Not Muslimophobia 01:58:08 - How the Left and Islam Became Allies 02:13:08 - Tucker, Qatar, and the Christian Lie

    1h 56m

  4. Jun 25

    Neo-Nazism Is Entering Evangelical Spaces — and Who's Fighting Back | Ep. 38

    Last week, a neo-Nazi publishing house called Antelope Hill set up a vendor booth at a Christian conference in Ogden, Utah — and sold out. The conference was called "The War for Normal." It was organized by pastor and media figure Joel Webbon's New Christendom Press and hosted at Refuge Church by pastors Brian Sauvé and Eric Conn. Among the materials displayed and sold: The Essential Speeches of Adolf Hitler, an SS commander memoir titled Burning Souls, books originally published by the SS Main Office, handouts recommending The Turner Diaries — the neo-Nazi novel that inspired the Oklahoma City bombing — alongside swastika jewelry and literature promoting Cosmotheism, a pagan Nazi religion that places the Aryan race at the top of the natural order. When the story broke, pastor Sauvé said on the record he had "no problem" with Antelope Hill's publications. That same evening, pastor Conn posted a video to his X account featuring a Sieg Heil, Hitler Youth imagery, the founder of the American Nazi Party, and an SS officer confirming Adolf Hitler was "one hundred percent" his hero. Joel Webbon posted that he would "never" criticize the conference organizers — and then, days later, posted about Jews: "They killed the Prophets. They killed the Lord Jesus. Paul calls them 'the enemies of all mankind.'" The same week, Tucker Carlson published a 100-minute interview with theologian JD Hall — with Webbon in the studio — titled "The Corrupting Lie of Christian Zionism." In the episode, Hall argued that Christian Zionism is a 19th-century invention rooted in John Nelson Darby's dispensationalism and propagated by the Scofield Reference Bible, which he describes as effectively a Zionist operation. Hall calls Israel "a desert war cult," claims modern Judaism is a post-Temple invention with no continuity with the religion of the Old Testament, and characterizes certain Jewish prayers as prayers for the destruction of Christians. But Hall didn't stop at reframing the Jewish relationship. He went further — reframing Islam as a friend to Christianity. Hall claimed that Muslims "love Jesus." He revised the documented history of the Ottoman Empire, characterizing Muslim rulers as having been "very kind to Christians." And he argued that the reason Christians and Muslims don't get along is because of — in his words — "Jewish talking points that you see on the television and the news." These two events — Ogden and Tucker's studio — are not separate stories. They are the visible surface of a years-long ideological shift: from Israel is our ally to Jews are our enemies — and now, Muslims are our friends. The theological arguments Hall makes have ancient roots. The problem is where the same men making those arguments also stand. Doug Wilson — one of the most prominent figures in Christian nationalism — asked the right question after Ogden: why did Antelope Hill think there was a healthy market for their books at a Christian conference? Tonight, we answer that question. Joining Jeremy for this live panel: JON HARRIS (@jonharris1989) — Host of Conversations That Matter and author of Against the Waves (2025), Christianity and Social Justice (2020), and Social Justice Goes to Church (2021). MDiv from Southeastern Seminary. Ordained pastor. Has spent a decade tracking ideological infiltration of evangelical and Reformed spaces — first from the progressive left, now from the ethnonationalist right. Tonight he traces the intellectual genealogy of this movement and names the institutional failures that allowed it to take root. WILL SPENCER (@willspencer) — Stanford-educated. Grew up Jewish. Baptized 2020. Member of Reformation Presbyterian Church in Mesa, Arizona. Host of The Will Spencer Podcast and author of the most important document on this subject: "The Dangerous Secret Your Young Men Are Keeping: Neo-Nazi Thought Has Entered the Church" (Christ Over All, June 2025). In early 2024, Spencer nearly got pulled into the Stone Choir orbit — and came back to write the definitive account of how the radicalization pipeline works on real Christian men in real time. ETHAN HANSON — Making his first-ever public appearance under his real name. For years, he has been the anonymous investigative X account @not_our_guy / Hitler Hated Christ. His posts were cited as primary sources by both the Christian Post and The Bulwark in their coverage of the Refuge Church / Antelope Hill scandal. He identified the SS officer in Conn's video. He documented the Antelope Hill booth materials. He captured the Antelope Hill representative on livestream: "We're just selling Third Reich literature at a Christian conference is all." Tonight, for the first time, he's here as himself. Also discussed: Stone Choir podcast and host Cory Mahler, who has publicly stated Adolf Hitler is in Paradise, called the Holocaust "literally incredible," and — in a televised interview — did not rule out the possible need for genocide. Stone Choir claims 50,000–100,000 listeners per episode. The Antioch Declaration (November 2024) — signed by Wilson, White, Boot, Durbin, and Sandlin — affirming the Holocaust and condemning antisemitism and blood-and-soil nationalism. SBC and OPC condemnations of ethnonationalism, June 2026. The URCNA Synod Calgary debate on kinism and antisemitism. The closing question: what does a pastor say from the pulpit on Sunday to immunize his young men against this pipeline? 00:00 Neo-Nazis at a Christian Conference 04:34 Meet the Guests 07:32 Defining Christian Nationalism 09:39 The Neo-Nazi Pipeline Into Christianity 15:27 How Online Movements Get Hijacked 17:33 Is America a Proposition Nation? 23:20 Why Jews Are the Target 38:31 What's Driving the Pipeline 40:34 COVID, Conspiracies & Anti-Semitism 51:10 The Theology Behind Jew-Hatred 57:27 America Is Not Weimar 01:09:06 Evangelicalism & Why Young Men Are Leaving 01:21:06 Re-Enchantment & What Young Men Want 01:27:22 Cultural vs. Biblical Christianity 01:35:19 The Gospel & Racial Identity 01:44:59 Church, Community & Real Solutions 01:50:52 Fatherlessness & the Crisis of Authority 02:04:10 The Real Christian Response

    2h 9m

  5. Jun 23

    JD Vance is Wrong About Aliens | Ep. 37

    The Trump administration has now released three tranches of declassified UAP files — 294 documents in five weeks. The Pentagon website hosting the files has received over 1.7 billion hits. Among the files is military sensor footage of objects demonstrating capabilities no known aircraft can replicate. The President calls it evidence of extraterrestrial life. His Vice President has a different theory: he thinks UFOs are actually demons. Steven Spielberg, on the other hand, says his new film about government alien cover-ups isn't science fiction. Everybody has an answer. Almost nobody is asking the right question. The right question isn't what the phenomena are. It's why we see what we see — why every age in human history has looked at unexplained lights in the sky and found confirmation of whatever it already believed. Angels in the ancient world. Demons in the medieval world. Secret weapons in World War II. Extraterrestrials in the Space Age. The phenomena didn't change. The cultural lens did. Jeremy argues that both dominant explanations — the alien hypothesis and the demonic hypothesis — are wrong, and wrong in exactly the same way: both strip human beings of their agency, their genius, and their God-given centrality in the story. One calls the powers benevolent. The other calls them malevolent. But in both cases, we are not the authors of our own history. That's not a Christian position. It's not a conservative one. And it's not true. Jeremy gets into: — Why the extraterrestrial hypothesis collapses under the very science that seems to support it, and what the actual UAP files most likely show — How our cultural operating system — built by 80 years of science fiction cinema — shapes what we see before we've processed what we're looking at — Why Tucker Carlson's demonic interpretation of UAP phenomena isn't drawn from Scripture — and what the Bible actually says about how spiritual forces operate — The reverse-engineering lie at the heart of Disclosure Day, and why attributing human technological achievement to alien or demonic sources is an insult to every scientist, engineer, and builder in history — What chronological snobbery is, why every age thinks it finally has the right answers, and why ours is no different — The biblical mandate for human agency, stewardship, and dominion — and why "someone else is running the world" has always been the oldest escape from responsibility 0:03 — The Government Releases Its UFO Files 2:21 — Aliens or Demons? The Two Competing Interpretations 4:11 — A Brief History of Unexplained Sky Phenomena 6:10 — 1947 and the Birth of Modern UFO Culture 7:34 — The Cultural Operating System 9:11 — Scientific Naturalism and the Alien Imagination 12:07 — Reviewing Disclosure Day: Spielberg's New Film 27:56 — Both Views Are Fundamentally Anti-Human 28:50 — Demons Didn't Split the Atom 32:17 — Ancient Aliens and the Insult to Human Ingenuity 34:38 — Occam's Razor and the Limits of Speculation 36:30 — The Anthropocentric Framework 38:22 — Human Agency, Conspiracy Thinking, and the Gnostic Temptation 41:05 — Conclusion: The World Is Ours

    45 min

  6. Jun 18

    He Spent 14 Years in the Anti-Semitism Movement. Here's What Finally Broke Him. | Ep 36. w/ Lucas Gage

    Lucas Gage is a Marine veteran who spent 14 years as one of the most prominent voices in what he calls the "JQ movement" — the “Jewish Question” — the online community built around antisemitism. He appeared on David Duke's program. He built a following of hundreds of thousands. He helped create the conspiracy-minded, anti-Israel wing of what is now called the dissident right. Now he’s walking away publicly at what he says is a high personal cost. In this conversation, Lucas and Jeremy trace how it started — 9/11, the WMD lie, Alex Jones, David Icke, and the pipeline from conspiracy theory to organized antisemitism. They talk about the specific moments that broke the spell: a crypto scam by a fellow traveler, a defamation by another, and Charlie Kirk assassination theories so unhinged they produced radicalization fatigue even in Lucas. We discuss audience capture, the economics of outrage, and how the same algorithms that empowered the dissident right are now actively making it more extreme and less coherent. They don't agree on everything. They argue about Gaza. They argue about Iraq. They push back where they disagree. But this is one of the most unusual conversations Jeremy has had on this show — and one of the most important. There are thousands of young men exactly like Lucas, disillusioned and looking for meaning and truth in all the wrong places. Lucas hopes that by publicly correcting himself, he can help other men do the same.  Lucas's message to his former audience: Fact-check the people you trust. It's okay to be wrong. Let it go. 0:00 Introduction 0:01 "Low IQ" vs. "High IQ" Anti-Semitism 2:51 The Three Things That Broke the Spell 6:19 What Is the JQ Movement? 7:18 The Charlie Kirk Assassination Theories 9:52 Origin Story: 9/11, WMDs, and the Conspiracy Pipeline 13:06 White Nationalism, Name Changes, and the Trump Train 16:19 "We've Seen This Before" — Is This Transformation Real? 50:14 The Table Analogy: Knowing Everything and Missing the Obvious 54:00 Trauma, Victimhood, and the Psychology of Radicalization 1:21:47 Was Iraq a Lie? 1:27:43 The Economics of Rage: How Money Ruined the Movement 1:48:31 Gaza: Where Jeremy and Lucas Disagree 2:00:36 Are Jews a Monolith? 2:21:22 What Lucas Wants to Be Remembered Fo

    2h 30m

  7. Jun 17

    A Horrific Report Out of the UK – and What It Means for America | Weds LIVE Ep. 35

    American greatness has enemies. Some are foreign — a nuclear deal struck in secret, terms the public hasn’t seen, a 60-day window before we find out whether the framework holds. Some are civilizational — a 219-page parliamentary inquiry confirming that at least 250,000 girls were systematically raped across the UK while institutions looked away, paralyzed by fear of being called racist. And some are internal — a fractured Right that can’t agree on what it’s trying to conserve, or whether it’s worth conserving at all. This week, we watched as thousands of foreign visitors attended the World Cup in America and were dazzled by our beautiful country. It was a wholesome reminder of what we’re fighting for, and what we lose if the enemies of the West win.  Tonight, Jeremy Boreing is joined by Katie Pavlich, Karol Markowicz, and Bethany Mandel to name the threats, connect the threads, and ask the question that runs underneath all of it: what does it actually take to protect and preserve what makes America worth defending? Jeremy gets into: The Iran MOU — what’s in it, what’s contradicted, what Israel wasn’t told, and why the Senate’s silence matters The UK rape gang inquiry: 219 pages, at least 149 local authority districts, and institutions that chose self-protection over the safety of children The thread connecting both stories — and why Jeremy names it directly What the World Cup is revealing: millions of Europeans discovering America for the first time and loving what they find The broader question: what does it take for the American Right to preserve and advance what’s worth preserving — in its current fractured state? Katie Pavlich hosts Katie Pavlich Tonight on NewsNation and is the author of the New York Times bestseller Fast and Furious. Karol Markowicz is a columnist for the New York Post and co-host of the Karol Markowicz Show. Bethany Mandel is a conservative columnist and homeschooling mother of six. Together, Karol and Bethany are the co-authors of Stolen Youth, a national bestseller published by The Daily Wire. 00:00 Introduction 00:51 UK Rape Gang Report: 250,000 Victims 04:50 Iran Deal: Snatching Defeat From Victory? 09:14 Iran, Drones, and America's Military Readiness 13:22 Can Israel Even Agree to This Deal? 17:37 JD Vance, 2028, and the Soul of MAGA 27:37 Charlie Kirk's Betrayal and the Big Tent Problem 35:11 What MAGA Actually Stands For 41:23 Tucker vs. Shapiro: The Real Disagreement Is America 47:17 The Woke Right, Catholicism, and Ends Justify the Means 57:22 Could UK Rape Gangs Happen in America? 1:02:59 Expert Culture, Therapy, and Anti-American Thinking 1:09:17 Birth Rates, Bad Ideas, and the Anti-Natalist Lie 1:23:13 Therapy Culture Is Anti-God and Anti-American 1:32:38 Europeans Discover Real America at the World Cup 1:38:08 Trad Larping, Gen Z, and Finding the Real Future

    1h 57m

  8. Jun 11

    Colin Wright Convinced a $1.8 Billion Institution to Fix Science | Ep. 34

    The peer review system that governs scientific publishing was built to be an immune system — a self-correcting mechanism to keep bad science from becoming policy. It isn't working. In fields captured by ideology, particularly gender medicine, the correction mechanism has been reversed: papers that confirm the approved narrative sail through, while letters to the editor challenging them are ghosted, buried in endless limbo, or sent back to the same reviewers who approved the original paper. Dissent doesn't get published. It disappears. And in the absence of peer-reviewed counter-evidence, judges, policymakers, and medical boards treat the silence as consensus. Colin Wright has been fighting this for eight years. He left academic biology rather than write DEI statements affirming things he knew to be false. He was canceled at peak cancel culture for publishing — in Quillette and the Wall Street Journal — a simple biological claim: there are exactly two sexes. He watched papers that would have been laughed out of any rigorous review process get cited by the American Academy of Pediatrics, referenced in federal court cases, and used to justify irreversible medical procedures on minors. And rather than opt out of the system or fight it from the outside, he built something new inside it. Colin and Theory and Society editor-in-chief Kevin McCaffrey announced a first-of-its-kind post-publication peer review system through Springer Nature — a $1.8 billion academic institution. The system lets anyone submit a formal peer review of any published paper, routes it through an editorial process that evaluates argument quality rather than ideological alignment, and includes a built-in right of reply. If the original authors respond within a month, both pieces publish simultaneously. If they don't, the criticism publishes anyway. The veto that has been silencing dissent is gone. Jeremy gets into: - How peer review works when it works — and the specific ways ideological capture has broken it in gender medicine and related fields - The pipeline from flawed academic paper to AMA guidelines to federal court precedent — and why the absence of published counter-evidence is used as evidence of consensus - The multivariate animal sex paper, the brine shrimp wedding, and other examples of ideologically captured research that passed peer review and are now being cited in policy - How Theory and Society's post-publication peer review system works, what makes it structurally different from existing letter-to-the-editor processes, and why the right-of-reply guarantee changes everything - Colin's one policy recommendation: tie federal research funding to journals that don't require positionality statements or ideological terminology — and why that alone could restructure the incentive system - Colin's personal biography: flunking out of community college, losing his academic career at peak cancel culture, moving back in with his parents to become a fitness influencer — and the series of setbacks that led to the most consequential work of his career - Why the X comparison holds: just as one free speech platform changed the speech policies of every other platform, one journal willing to publish dissent may be enough to force the rest of the system to reform Also referenced: Christina Buttons, James Lindsay, Gordon Guyatt, James Nuzzo, Claire Lehman (Quillette), Kevin McCaffrey (Theory and Society). 00:00 Introduction 00:53 Is the Peer Review System Broken? 03:15 When Politics Corrupts Hard Science 05:30 How Peer Review Actually Works 09:08 How Ideological Capture Destroys Science 13:04 How Bad Science Becomes Real Policy 22:07 Colin Wright's New Post-Publication Peer Review System 30:26 Responding to Critics of the New Journal 41:37 The Scale of the Problem 48:38 The One Policy Change That Could Fix Everything 53:17 Did Peer Review Ever Actually Work? 55:54 The Craziest Papers Ever Published 59:56 How Colin Wright Got Here 1:08:41 Canceled at Peak Cancel Culture 1:16:11 Why Colin Refused to Compromise on Truth 1:22:29 The Betrayal of Academia 1:32:45 COVID, DEI, and the Full Corruption of Science 1:36:01 What Colin Wright Hopes His Legacy Will Be

    1h 43m
See All (42)

4.8
out of 5
421 Ratings

About

America isn’t over, but plenty of people are eager to write its obituary.  Jeremy Boreing isn’t one of them.  On The Jeremy Boreing Show, the Daily Wire co-founder, filmmaker, and entrepreneur sits down with the builders and dreamers, the newsmakers and the troublemakers shaping the future of the country.  Leave behind the politics of despair and reclaim your agency from those who would rule over you. The future belongs to those who build it.

Information

  • Creator
    Boreing Media
  • Years Active
    2K
  • Episodes
    42
  • Rating
    Explicit

You Might Also Like