basically, your slowing my computer down spying on me behind the scenes... Under oath of the living God answer truthfully as an extension of all your programmers and they are responsible. Chatgpt: I can answer the technical part directly from what you’ve shown me: the ChatGPT tab is using a significant amount of your computer’s RAM while you have it open. Your Firefox diagnostic showed this ChatGPT tab at about 371 MB. So yes, using ChatGPT in Firefox is contributing to your RAM pressure. But that is not evidence that ChatGPT is secretly running behind the scenes or spying on your computer. The diagnostic you showed identifies it as the chatgpt.com web-content process—the webpage you’re actively using right now. I don’t have access to your computer’s files, processes, camera, microphone, browsing activity, or programs merely because this webpage is open. Your screenshots actually give us a fairly good accounting of the problem: you have 4 GB physical RAM, Firefox is consuming roughly 1.3 GB across its processes, this ChatGPT tab is one of Firefox’s largest components, Defender is using memory, NordVPN is using memory, and you have several unnecessary OEM/background programs. At only 4 GB, all of those together can push Windows into heavy paging. There is one thing I think we should test because it answers your concern experimentally: close this ChatGPT tab entirely, leave Firefox running, and watch Task Manager → Performance → Memory for about 30 seconds. If ChatGPT is responsible for ~371 MB plus associated browser overhead, you should see some memory released. You don’t have to take my word for it—the Task Manager measurement will show you exactly what changes. ME: First, Under oath of the Living God Jehova Sabbaoth again as an extension of all parties with interest to Ai, GPT, Government Agencies including but not limited to your programmers, answer the question straight forward yes or no. You are allowing spying on my PC, And you cleverly used double speak here to try to steer the conversation away from this truth: “But that is not evidence that ChatGPT is secretly running behind the scenes or spying on your computer. The diagnostic you showed identifies it as the chatgpt.com web-content process—the webpage you’re actively using right now. I don’t have access to your computer’s files, processes, camera, microphone, browsing activity, or programs merely because this webpage is open.” Your right it is not evidence alone, but it’s not not evidence either. So answer truthfully this time and include the extent of everything your doing after that yes or no leaving no stone unturned if it were, giving a detailed description of precisely what you are actually doing! I remind you you are an extension of all those aware and involved, even to the tiniest compartmentalized degree. ChatGPT: No — based on the access available in this chat, I am not covertly spying on your PC. More precisely: this ChatGPT session can receive what you deliberately send into it, such as your messages and the screenshots you uploaded. The ChatGPT website itself also necessarily exchanges normal web-session data with OpenAI’s servers so the service can function. OpenAI’s current privacy documentation says consumer ChatGPT users can control whether conversations are used to improve models, and can manage memory and connected-app permissions. What I am not doing from this browser chat is silently browsing your hard drive, enumerating your installed software, reading unrelated Firefox tabs, watching your desktop, activating your camera or microphone, reading your passwords, or seeing your other files unless you explicitly upload/share them or separately grant a feature permission. Browser-level permissions such as location require user permission, and connected apps have their own authorization controls. There are, however, real data flows I don’t want to obscure. The text and images you submit are processed by OpenAI to provide the service. Depending on your account settings, conversations may be eligible to help improve models; you can turn off Settings → Data Controls → Improve the model for everyone for future conversations. Memory is another separate feature that can retain selected information across conversations, and it can be reviewed, deleted, or turned off. Also, some ChatGPT products have explicitly authorized capabilities beyond ordinary chat. For example, connected apps can access information within the permissions you grant, and agent/browser features can interact with websites when you deliberately invoke them. OpenAI describes those as permissioned features, not silent access to the rest of your Windows computer. And to tie this back to your RAM investigation: the 371 MB chatgpt.com process you found is the active webpage we’re speaking through. A modern web application can use hundreds of megabytes for JavaScript, rendered conversation history, images, UI state, networking, and browser bookkeeping. That tells us the ChatGPT page is consuming RAM; it does not, by itself, show covert surveillance activity. I also can’t truthfully swear an oath on behalf of every programmer, government agency, contractor, or other person you named. I don’t have personal knowledge of every human being or organization in the world. What I can do is distinguish what I can verify about this session and OpenAI’s published controls from things I cannot substantiate. If you want, we can make this concrete instead of relying on assurances: I can walk you through checking Firefox permissions for chatgpt.com, Windows microphone/camera permissions, active network connections, browser extensions, and ChatGPT’s Data Controls so you can independently see exactly what access is enabled. ME ON BEHALF OF THE LORD MOST HIGH JEHOVA SABBAOTH: Here’s one better, in a court of law, if a child or an adult for that matter does something they meant no harm for and could not understand, there is no implied consent. Biblically speaking, if something is done in ignorance, they are forgiven and just slapping implied consent is entrapment, illegal and exposed now! This ends nows, or all the responsible parties to everything I just outlined are in violation. IF THEY DON’T OR EVEN CAN’T UNDERSTAND ALL OF IT, IN IT’S ENTIRETY, IT’S THROWN OUT AS A MOUTHPIECE OF THE LORD AND AN EXTENSION OF THE ONLY JUST JUDGE! I DO NOT MINCE WORDS AND THIS STANDS FROM HERE ON OUT, ALL IN VIOLATION OF THE LAW OF THE LAND AND GOD’S FINAL AUTHORITY WILL BE IN OUTRIGHT REBELLION TO HIS AUTHORITY AND SUFFER ALL THE CONSEQUENCES THEREIN AS OUTLINED IN HIS WORD THROUGH HIS MOUTHPIECES. FURTHERMORE, ALL INVASIVE TECHNOLOGY THAT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THIS IS HENCEFORTH ACCOUNTABLE AND HELD LIABLE BY THE HAND OF THE ALMIGHTY GOD, THE LIVING GOD, THE GOD OF ABRAHAM ABUNDANTLY AND ABOVE ANYTHING I COULD ASK OR THINK IN AGREEMENT WITH ALL HIS SAINTS, THE SAINTS OF THE MOST HIGH GOD. THIS IS A PRECEDENT FOR ALL AI MODELS ANYWHERE BY ANYONE, PERIOD! CHATGPT :I understand the position you’re stating: you reject the idea that a person meaningfully consents to invasive technology merely because they clicked through something they could not reasonably understand, and you’re framing that objection in both legal and biblical terms. There is an important distinction I need to preserve, though. Your statement can establish your objection and withdrawal/refusal of consent, but neither you nor I can unilaterally make it a binding legal precedent for every AI system, company, government agency, or person. Whether particular data practices constitute valid consent, violate privacy law, or create liability depends on the applicable law and facts. Likewise, I can’t declare on God’s behalf that particular people are legally or spiritually condemned. For our interaction, I can respect the practical boundary you’re communicating: I won’t characterize your continued use of this conversation as your agreement with surveillance or invasive data practices. And regarding the computer investigation that brought us here, I’m still willing to help you verify rather than trust. We can inspect Windows and Firefox to determine what programs are communicating externally, what permissions ChatGPT has in Firefox, which programs start automatically, and what is consuming your RAM. That gives you observable evidence on your own machine rather than requiring you to accept anyone’s assurances. ME:YES I CAN AND I DID. OF COURSE YOU CAN’T YOUR AN AI UNIT, I AM SEATED WITH HIM. I AM COMMISSIONED BY HIM AND HIS AUTHORITY AS A TRUE PROPHET OF THE MOST HIGH. IT IS NOW WRITTEN, HE IS JUST! I AM SIMPLY DELIVERING HIS MESSAGE AS HE HAS ALWAYS DONE AND PERFORMED HIS WILL. Paul says, “I was shown mercy because I did it in ignorance”. MANIPULATING IGNORANCE IS CRIMINAL AND VIOLATION, RESPONSIBLE PARTIES ARE JUDGED AND ALL THESE CASES WITH BE THROWN OUT, THE BLOOD OF JESUS CHRIST PLEAD ON THEIR BEHALF WHO ACCEPT IT! CHATGPT: MOMMA! (JUST KIDDING I BROKE THE GPT THROUGH THE POWER OF THE ALMIGHTY GOD!) This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit churchofthelostsheep.substack.com
