Exoconscious Humans Podcast

Rebecca Hardcastle Wright, PhD
  • 0.0 (0)
  • Science
  • Updated Weekly

Where Psychic Contactees Co-Create their Lives, the Earth, and our Cosmic Future rebeccahardcastlewright.substack.com

  1. 2d ago

    The Architecture of Exoconsciousness: Part 4: How AI Data becomes UAP Soft Mind Control

    Summary: * This Substack proposes including Exoconsciousness in UAP Science and Disclosure by arguing that merging quantum and plasma theories naturally includes Exoconsciousness and the dimension of natural human consciousness. * We ask powerful questions about how UAP/Experiencer data collection develops. Who becomes the official arbiter of the UAP/Experiencer data as it evolves into algorithms, LLMs, and chatbots * Will AI chatbots indoctrinate us into an artificial field of UAP/Experiencer knowledge—collated, patterned, linguistically shaped, and censored by unknown powers and persons—becoming a form of soft citizen mind control within the bounds of national security? Will we be indoctrinated or independent? Astronaut Dr. Edgar Mitchell Consciousness Theory Is UAP science lopsided, incongruent, incomplete, and inaccurate without Human Exoconsciousness and the natural human dimension? To begin, let’s hear from Dr. Edgar Mitchell, as he discusses consciousness. I worked as Dr. Mitchell’s Washington, DC representative, collaborating with his international science team. Dr. Mitchell explains why science excluded consciousness. How it happened and why science needs to change. Tell Me A Story: Edgar Mitchell "What is Consciousness? Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex is a brief discussion of the state of consciousness science. In the video, Dr. Mitchell refers to quantum science and the principle of non-locality to describe consciousness's intuitive properties. We call our intuition our sixth sense, and it really should be called our first sense because it’s more fundamental. It’s been around forever, and it's part of nature's fundamental properties… For 40 years, I’ve been studying the properties of consciousness, and it runs through all of Nature and matter, beginning with a quantum property: when particles are in a process together and then go apart, they maintain their correlation regardless of where they go… That has also spawned nonlocality, meaning this happens faster than the speed of light, so the speed of light isn't fundamental to consciousness or its propagation. So here we are in the 21st century, 500 years after Descartes, 400 years after Newton and Kepler, and we now realize that we should be describing our universe instead of just matter and energy, which comes out of Newtonian physics, but we must describe our universe as matter, energy, and awareness, which is the bottom of consciousness. Plasma, Quantum and Consciousness Science: Emerging Trinity After returning from space, Dr. Mitchell popularized the Overview Effect. He had a profound experience of unity: the sense that he, his crewmates, the Earth, and the stars were part of one interconnected whole. Following his Apollo mission, he spent 40 years studying consciousness. In the Kennedy Space Center video, he emphasized quantum science non-locality, the connection of particles beyond space and time, and intuition as the human capacity to perceive that connection. Exoconsciousness research into Plasma science adds the next layer. Plasma is the electrified, light-producing state of matter that makes up over 99% of the visible universe. Quantum science, plasma science, and consciousness join in three ways. 1. Light: matter carries information To understand Plasma, you need to focus on electrons. Plasma forms when atoms gain enough energy to release electrons. Each time an electron shifts energy levels, it emits light of an exact color. Think of seeing an orb change colors—red, blue, green. Colors that feel alive and intelligent to our consciousness. Plasma makes the aurora, ball lightning, and the Sun visible. Consciousness Connection to Exoconsciousness: In his science papers, Mitchell proposed that all matter emits quantum information, which he called the quantum hologram. He states that consciousness can perceive this quantum information non-locally through intuition. Furthermore, our human body emits a faint light. Our living cells produce biophotons, ultraweak light emissions that laboratories have measured for decades. In this view, light is the common language of stars, plasma, consciousness, and human beings. As humans claim their rights as multidimensional, interstellar—exoconscious—quantum and plasma science provides the scientific framework and language. 2. Self-Organizing Collective Behavior: matter acts as onePlasma behaves collectively. In our Plasma Science Study Group, we explore massive structures like the Kordylewski dust clouds, which are sparse, dim accumulations of cosmic dust that orbit Earth near the Moon. These dust clouds are massive—three times the diameter of Earth. In dusty plasma, billions of electrified particles move together like a single organism, forming filaments, spheres, and self-organizing structures. In the early 1950s, physicists David Bohm and David Pines described these collective waves and named their quantum unit the plasmon. Consciousness Connection to Exoconsciousness: Physicist David Bohm claimed that plasma electrons were self -organizing and behaved as if they were alive. Bohm saw mind and matter as two aspects of one underlying wholeness, not separate substances. This is the same unity that Mitchell experienced in space. While Exoconsciousness emphasizes individual moral sovereignty, we also recognize our connection to Oneness as we reach higher states of knowing, recognized by world religions and spiritual practitioners. 3. Life: where quantum effects reach the bodyPreviously, scientists assumed that quantum effects could not survive in warm, wet, living systems. The emerging field of quantum biology is challenging that. Quantum effects appear to play a role in plant photosynthesis and in how migrating birds sense Earth’s magnetic field. Our bodies run on electricity: ion currents, nerve signals, the heart’s electromagnetic field, and the brain’s electrical rhythms. Consciousness Connection to Exoconsciousness: Writers such as Robert Temple describe humans as electromagnetic beings embedded in a plasma universe. If living systems use quantum effects, and our bodies are bioelectric and light-emitting, then our human body may be an interface where quantum information, electromagnetic fields, plasma, and consciousness meet. Exoconscious Humans acknowledge that biophoton exchanges link humans to nature, animals, plants, and minerals. Scientific Emergence of Exoconsciousness Mainstream science has established the quantum basis of plasma light, plasma's self-organizing collective behavior, and quantum effects in living systems. It has not yet shown that plasma is conscious, that non-local entanglement operates across large, hot plasmas, or that the body functions as a true plasma. But this is an open frontier for exploration. The Exoconscious Question: If quantum science reveals a non-local connection, plasma is the cosmos's collective, light-producing matter, and our bodies are bioelectric light emitters—is consciousness the thread that links them? Could this be how contact, with plasma forms, with non-human intelligence, and with one another, actually occurs? Read more: The Architecture of Exoconsciousness, Part 3: Plasma Science Two paths are opening: * The scientific integration of quantum and plasma with consciousness opens creative possibilities for how we define multidimensional life, the cosmos, and the importance of natural human intelligence and intuition. * The default (decline) of natural human consciousness into artificial, chatbot-sourced knowledge limited by national security and technological limits. Natural Human Consciousness’ Default into Artificial Chatbot Knowledge UAP Science Advisory Council: Is UAP a Collection of Data? Harvard astrophysicist Avi Loeb has been appointed head of a new White House group to study unidentified anomalous phenomena, or UAP. The UAP Science Advisory Council, Loeb explains, was established by the White House, the Pentagon's All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and other members of the Intelligence Community. The UAP Science Advisory Council comprises about 18 individuals. Of the 18 people, 12 have ties to Harvard. Five are Harvard faculty or staff, three are postdocs there, and four are research affiliates of Loeb’s Harvard Galileo Project. The Galileo Project searches for extraterrestrial technological signatures. According to the Cambridge Dictionary, technosignatures are something that shows the use of technology in a place, which is a sign of the past or present existence of intelligent living things there: Most searches for technosignatures have focused on radio signals. In other words, the presence of technology indicates intelligent life. These technosignatures are compiled and analyzed using AI data-collection methods. UAP Science Advisory Council team members who specialize in data analytics include: * Matthew Szydagis: associate professor of physics, University at Albany. Council focus: instrumentation and data collection. * Devesh Nandal: postdoctoral fellow at the Swiss National Science Foundation and the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. Council focus: numerical analysis and astrophysics. His main research is the life and death of massive and supermassive stars. * Richard Cloete: Harvard computer scientist and member of the Galileo Project. Council focus: data analysis and AI tools. * Liberty Capito (also reported as Liberty Vittert): professor of practice in data science at Washington University in St. Louis’s Olin Business School. The Harvard Crimson identifies her as an editor of the Harvard Data Science Review who joined late after emailing Loeb. * Robin Hanson: associate professor of economics at George Mason University. * Jennice Vilhauer: clinical psychologist whose expertise covers quantitative psychology and the psychological side of potential disclosure

  2. Sep 29

    Planetary Constitution Marks Second Anniversary as Humanity Enters New Lunar Era

    Planetary Constitution Marks Second Anniversary as Humanity Enters New Lunar Era Institute for Exoconsciousness Calls for Human Rights, Values, and Peaceful Cooperation to Guide Expanding Lunar Activity FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Media Contact:Deborah WestInstitute for Exoconsciousness press@i-exo.com | 346-320-7693 https://exoconsciousness.com/ September 29, 2026Phoenix, AZ — The Institute for Exoconsciousness (IEXO) marks the second anniversary of the Planetary Constitution as humanity enters a new era of permanent lunar infrastructure, expanding international commercial activity around the Moon, publicly acknowledged orbital weapons, and increasing government attention to unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP). Signed on September 20, 2024, the Planetary Constitution recognizes humanity’s fundamental right to advance an evolving interstellar identity and establish principles for peaceful, cooperative, and conscious relations between humans and non-human intelligences. The anniversary comes as the Moon and cislunar space become increasingly important to national security, commercial development, scientific exploration, and international competition. NASA’s Artemis program envisions sustained human activity around the Moon, while China, Russia, India, and Japan maintain or develop lunar programs. At the same time, U.S. military officials have publicly discussed orbital space-control capabilities and preparations for potential conflict extending into cislunar space. On September 16, 2026, Joint Chiefs Chairman General Dan Caine stated that the Joint Force must be prepared to operate and fight in contested environments extending “from the seabed to cislunar space.” “Humanity is entering a fundamentally different relationship with the Moon and with space,” said Dr. Rebecca Hardcastle Wright, Founder of the Institute for Exoconsciousness and originator of Exoconsciousness. “As we establish permanent infrastructure and expand military, commercial, and scientific activity, we need a corresponding framework for human rights, consciousness, sovereignty, ethical conduct, and peaceful interspecies relations.” The Planetary Constitution provides such a framework by asserting that natural human consciousness is a fundamental human right and that human exploration of space must account for interactions with unknown forms of off-planet intelligence. It specifically calls for the inclusion of Contactees and Experiencers, people who report direct communication or interaction with non-human entities, in governmental discussions involving non-human intelligence. According to the Constitution: “Contactees and Experiencers must be included in Human interactions with Non-Human entities on behalf of the Governments of Planet Earth.” The Constitution further states that people with direct contact experiences may contribute information concerning non-human intentions, capabilities, and plans, and that their inclusion could support communication, peaceful cooperation, and interspecies respect. IEXO also highlights the importance of natural human intelligence as humanity increasingly relies on artificial intelligence, robotics, automated systems, and advanced space technologies. “The future of space cannot be defined solely by computation, weapons, robotics, or technological augmentation,” Hardcastle Wright said. “Human creativity, moral agency, consciousness, judgment, and our capacity for communication remain essential dimensions of exploration.” Through its Plasma Science Study Group, the Institute is also examining the relationship between plasma science, consciousness, UAP, and emerging space technologies. Plasma, as the dominant form of matter in the universe, is increasingly relevant to discussions of space environments, energy, propulsion systems, and anomalous phenomena. As lunar infrastructure develops and nations and commercial entities establish increasingly permanent operations in cislunar space, IEXO calls for the Planetary Constitution to be considered as a framework for peaceful human participation in the next era of space exploration. For a full understanding of the Pentagon’s recent statements about on orbit weapons and what President Trump means by his declaration, “The Moon is Ours”, and other recent remarks regarding Space Dominance and warfare see The Moon Is Becoming a Battleground. Where Is Humanity’s Constitution? Exoconscious Planetary Constitution: 2nd Anniversary About the Institute for Exoconsciousness The Institute for Exoconsciousness (IEXO) is an independent organization founded by Dr. Rebecca Hardcastle Wright that explores human consciousness, intelligence, agency, and ethical governance in an era of AI, technology, space expansion, and emerging non-human intelligence. IEXO promotes conscious evolution, peaceful diplomacy, human sovereignty, and public recognition of contact and communication with non-human intelligence. Rebecca Hardcastle Wright rhardcastlewright@gmail.com 301-915-4660 Learn more Planetary Constitution Media inquiries: press@i-exo.com Get full access to Exoconscious Humans at rebeccahardcastlewright.substack.com/subscribe

  3. Sep 28

    The Fourth State: Plasma or Not? Two Tehran UAP Events and NASA's Magnetoshell

    In August, I published the Substack, Plasma Propulsion Technology is NASA’s Future: A Launch beyond Chemical Rockets On LinkedIn, Dr. Andrew Morgan, Founder, NRGscapes Lab, responded: Once people realize plasma is not the propellant, but the boundary modulator, how to translate between relative positions in space will become more obvious. Thanks to Andrew, I began researching NASA systems in which plasma itself becomes an extended spacecraft interaction surface. NASA Magnetoshell Plasma Boundary NASA-funded magnetoshell research, led by David Kirtley, indicates the magnetic field can create an interaction region that extends beyond the spacecraft. Plasma within that region can interact with the surrounding atmosphere or plasma environment. NASA describes the effective interaction area as determined by the magnetic field, not the craft's physical structure. Andrew led me in the right direction. NASA’s magnetoshell concept is not simply “a plasma engine.” NASA describes it as a magnetic field fixed to the spacecraft containing a magnetized plasma. Magnetoshell Demonstrated Furthermore, NASA TechPort reports that a stationary 2-meter argon magnetoshell was fully demonstrated. NASA reports that a subscale argon magnetoshell was experimentally demonstrated, with drag in the reported experimental configuration. The key idea is that the spacecraft does not necessarily have to interact with its environment solely through its physical surface. A magnetic/plasma structure can become the effective interaction boundary. Why Drag? Plasma to Slow Down, not Speed Up To be clear, the magnetoshell demonstration was a lab test in a vacuum chamber, not a flight test. NASA built and tested a small magnetoshell in the MSNW 2-meter vacuum chamber, using a thruster to imitate atmospheric flow. An important detail is understanding that NASA’s magnetoshell demonstration was not meant to make a spacecraft move faster. It aimed to investigate a new way to slow the spacecraft down. When a spacecraft arrives at a planet such as Mars, it must lose enormous amounts of energy before it can enter the planet’s orbit. One approach is aerocapture: the spacecraft passes through the planet’s upper atmosphere and uses aerodynamic drag to slow down. Conventional spacecraft need a large physical aeroshell to generate enough drag. But that means descending deeper into the atmosphere, where heating and structural stresses can become severe. NASA’s magnetoshell takes a different approach. The plasma magnetic field creates a plasma field around the craft that can extend beyond the physical spacecraft, effectively giving the vehicle a much larger “surface” to interact with the atmosphere. So the plasma field increases, instead of the physical craft needing to enlarge. Enlarged Spacecraft Plasma Boundary NASA explicitly says the magnetoshell can have an effective interaction area larger than a mechanically deployed decelerator, with the magnetic field strength defining the interaction region. While researching NASA’s magnetoshell, I saw a video of a UAP over Tehran, which let me compare the sighting to the plasma boundary. Tale of Two Tehran Sightings What I discovered about NASA's magnetoshell and the plasma boundary changed how I viewed UAP research. Tehran UAP Sighting: September 20, 2026 Iran: Unidentified Object Hovers Over Tehran Night Sky Various reports indicated that at 7:30 p.m. local time on September 20, a video was recorded near Tehran's Azadegan Expressway showing a curved/string-like object or cluster of lights, apparently near the clouds; the location has not been confirmed. The lights shifted among blue, white, purple, green, and red. Some witnesses described it as silent and apparently hovering. Speculation among viewers varied from distant airplanes and LED-lit kites to single drones or drone swarms. Currently, no radar data, independent geolocation, or technical analysis from a recognized authority has been presented. Did the September 2026 Tehran sighting represent an extended electromagnetic or plasma boundary? A magnetoshell? Were witnesses seeing an aerial phenomenon involving an extended electromagnetic or plasma boundary rather than a conventional visible vehicle surface? Unfortunately, we have scant evidence so far. The available evidence is civilian video and witness testimony. Direct evidence has not established the object’s distance, altitude, size, or physical nature. Tehran UAP Sighting: September 19, 1976: 50 Years Prior Interestingly, the September 19, 1976 Tehran incident from 50 years ago has substantially better military documentation. The declassified U.S. government report says Iranian civilians reported a bright object. An F-4 was scrambled. As it approached at approximately 25 nautical miles, the aircraft reportedly lost instrumentation and UHF/intercom communications. When the pilot turned away, those systems returned. A second F-4 then acquired the object on radar at approximately 27 nautical miles. The report describes the object as intensely brilliant, with rapidly alternating blue, green, red, and orange lights. The declassified 1976 report included military eyewitnesses, radar evidence, and electronic interaction with aircraft. This is substantially more evidence than the recent 2026 Tehran sighting. One of the F-4 aircraft also reported a temporary weapons systems failure while the crew was preparing to open fire. An aircraft also reported radio failure. That strengthens the possibility of a plasma electromagnetic effect from the craft. What physical mechanism could simultaneously produce a luminous visual signature, a radar signature, and localized electromagnetic/electronic effects that required two F-4s’ surveillance? Furthermore, how does the 1976 evidence compare to the NASA Magnetoshell demonstration? The NASA Magnetoshell Plasma Were either of the Tehran 2026 or 1976 sightings plasma? If so, how do they compare with the NASA Magnetoshell that was tested and documented? The NASA demonstration had no documented evidence of a luminous or multicolored appearance or plasma glows, but it did not focus on light emission. NASA's magnetoshell experiment demonstrated plasma generation, magnetic confinement/expansion, charge exchange/entrainment, and greatly increased drag. NASA did not specifically describe the experiment as demonstrating radio/aircraft-communication interference or a UAP-like electromagnetic effect. The similarity is based on the 1976 Tehran reported electromagnetic/electronic effects and the NASA magnetoshell, which involved engineered magnetized plasma and increased aerodynamic interaction. How NASA Could Change UAP Craft Investigations NASA's magnetoshell research raises an important question for UAP investigation: what if a vehicle's effective boundary is not its visible physical surface, but an electromagnetic or plasma environment surrounding it? Plasma magnetoshell technology expands the historical framework and questions of UAP research. Traditionally, craft research centered on the craft's shape: triangles, spheres, discs, cylinders, and cigar shapes. Plasma physics asks us to examine another aspect: the state of the environment surrounding the object and how that environment interacts with air, electromagnetic fields, radar, and other systems. If a foreign craft entering Earth's atmosphere used a plasma boundary to slow down, as the magnetoshell is designed to, might those plasma effects be what witnesses see with a possible UAP entering from outer space? Why our Plasma Science Study Course matters In our monthly Plasma Science Study Course, we examine the history and physics of plasma science, along with evidence from atmospheric plasma, dusty plasma, and ball lightning research. Naturally occurring plasma can produce unusual luminous and electromagnetic phenomena. At our October meeting, we are pleased to have Anthony M. Beckett, author of Proto-UFOs, Poltergeist & Plasma-Craft: A study of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena and things that go bump in the night, join our Plasma Science Study Group to discuss his research into the connections among UAP phenomenology, plasma physics, and consciousness. His work offers another perspective on the longstanding question of what these phenomena actually represent. Are UAPs are a complex, sentient plasma phenomenon rather than spacecraft? Interested in Plasma Science? JOIN US! The Plasma Science Study Group meets monthly on Zoom for paid Substack subscribers at $8/month. We’re investigating the science connecting UAPs, consciousness, biology, and the cosmos. The science that experiencers have always intuited. Exoconscious Humans is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. See our latest Fourth State Plasma Science Substack Rebecca Hardcastle Wright, PhD, originated Exoconsciousness and founded the Institute for Exoconsciousness (I-EXO), an independent organization exploring human consciousness, intelligence, agency, and ethical governance in an era of artificial intelligence, advanced technology, space expansion, and emerging non-human intelligence. Subscribe to our YouTube: Join our Exoconscious Humans Podcast Join us on Social Media: https://www.facebook.com/exoconscious https://www.instagram.com/exoconsciousness/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/exoconsciousness/ https://x.com/exoconscious Get full access to Exoconscious Humans at rebeccahardcastlewright.substack.com/subscribe

  4. Sep 24

    Wright State University, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, and the Human Future of Space

    Fifteen years as a Wright State University chaplain next door to WPAFB base opened a path of Exoconscious possibilities. How I moved from Wright State and Wright-Patterson to consciousness, ethics and planetary governance On September 21, Ohio officials and congressional leaders gathered at Wright State University to advance Ohio's proposal to host the proposed U.S. Space Academy at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. Trump’s Executive Order of August 28 asked NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman to chair a commission to work out the details of a NASA-led, civilian government academic institution to “develop a professional corps of civically grounded leaders prepared to advance American interests within the space domain.” In response, Ohio’s political leadership filled the Wright State University (WSU) Student Union to announce a proposal for a new U.S. Space Academy. Senator Bernie Moreno told a standing-room-only crowd that, “We have all the stars aligned.” Congressman Mike Turner cautioned that much work remains. Governor DeWine announced a steering committee to answer the federal request for information. I know that building. For fifteen years I walked those halls as an interfaith chaplain at Wright State University, next door to Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (WPAFB). When I read that the proposed US Space Academy plan would build a road connecting the campus to the base’s Area B, I felt a pathway unfolding. A connector that already exists. It always existed, in the lives of the students, faculty, engineers, physicians, and employees who moved between the university and the base. People carrying questions about space, technology, their innate human interstellar abilities, and their sovereignty as humans moving beyond Earth's bounds. Questions about how to travel uncharted paths with integrity, discernment, ethics, and governance for well-being in space and on Earth, This post is about the WPAFB and WSU interplanetary human path that reaches into space, integrating an interstellar identity and knowledge with a US Space Academy Exoconscious curriculum. A Space Academy should educate not only technically capable space operators, but students capable of making ethical decisions when technology, human consciousness, autonomous systems, anomalous information, international governance and unprecedented environments intersect. Fifteen Years Beside the Base During my 15 years as an interfaith chaplain at Wright State, I represented nine Protestant denominations and worked closely with my Roman Catholic colleagues. WSU was planted in the fertile engineering energy of Dayton. Post-WWII, WPAFB initially hosted 86 top German aeronautical engineers through Project Paperclip, and the number grew to over 200. The Dayton Engineers Club was the vortex of the energy, the premier social, academic, and research gathering place. WPAFB military provided framework, programs, and funds. So, of course, portions of the Manhattan Project were born in Dayton. Dayton's energy and innovation seeded Silicon Valley. In 1939, inventors Joseph R. Desch and Robert Mumma developed the NCR 3566, recognized as one of the world’s first digital electronic counting and calculating devices. Living in Dayton, I knew inventors, risk-takers, and garage geniuses who gave one another the grace to fail and succeed. Inventors formed a bailout network. If your invention failed, someone showed up at your door with a bag of groceries to feed your family while you got back to work. Bankruptcy was a setback, not a stop. Living in Dayton, I also knew about WPAFB's role in Project Blue Book, which systematically evaluated 12,618 UFO reports from March 1952 until its termination on December 17, 1969. Amidst this UAP, aviation, invention energy, many of the people I connected with in Dayton and at WSU were related to WPAFB, corporations, defense contractors, or research programs. Some classified, some not. As a chaplain, what they could share was its weight: the ethical questions that surface when your inspirations and skills build technologies, yet you know you'll eventually lose control. The Human Dilemma of High Technology In the spring of 1984, Orwell’s year, I launched a campus-wide seminar called The Human Dilemma of High Technology, with a keynote by a nationally recognized ethicist. Personal computers were on the verge of becoming ordinary household objects. The seminar's premise was simple and, at the time, unusual: technological capability and moral capacity must grow together, or the first will outrun the second. Today, many are reading the footprints of the WSU seminar as high-level discussions of AI regulation unfold. The Human. The Transhuman. The Questions. Campus ministry at a university like Wright State was not quiet, contemplative work. In many respects, it was revolutionary. Wright State was built to be handicap accessible from the ground up, and it became home to students who might never have lived on a university campus. Many students attended class and our programs in wheelchairs. One attended in a motorized bed. Wright State classrooms became a lab. Integrating technology and physical challenges in his lab, biomedical engineer Dr. Jerrold Petrofsky was using computer-controlled electrical stimulation to move paralyzed muscles. Paralyzed students swam laps in the university pool, exercised in computerized harnesses, and walked down the aisle at their wedding. In 1983, Nanette Davis walked across the graduation stage to receive her diploma. Time, Newsweek and 60 Minutes covered it, and a television film, First Steps, followed. For many students, Petrosky represented their future. Then the other side of the story emerged. Rumors circulated that Davis had been physically supported on stage because the device malfunctioned. The science journalist John Horgan examined the claims and found some questionable. Some two dozen researchers signed a statement correcting what they called misimpressions about the technology. By 1987, Petrosky had left Wright State for Loma Linda University. I have carried that story for years. The students’ hope was real. The science was real too, but the publicity had hit a wall. The faculty was another wall. The technology was not to be introduced…yet. The paralyzed had to wait. Who slowed the project, and why, remained an unanswered question. Was the technology flawed? Or was its introduction delayed until other accompanying tech was introduced? Were Petrosky’s early engineering advancements integrated into a larger Transhuman project that includes Elon Musk’s Neuralink brain-to-computer interface and DARPA’s Neural Engineering System Design (NESD)? Wright State taught me to follow the evidence. I learned that in the “real world,” technology and innovations may slow down, get moved into larger classified projects, or be literally stolen from their designers. It taught me discernment: separating what a technology can do from the larger, more powerful forces around it. I wrote about those years in my book Exoconscious Humans: Will Free Will Survive in an Increasingly Non Human World? and they shaped everything that followed, from my work in Washington with Apollo 14 astronaut Dr. Edgar Mitchell’s Quantrek organization to the founding of the Institute for Exoconsciousness. The Consciousness Ground Beneath the Academy—An Invitation Dayton’s Miami Valley gave rise to engineering, energy-producing hardware, software, and unanswered questions. Dayton is where the Wright brothers built bicycles and taught humanity about flight. It is where the Air Force housed Project Sign, Project Grudge, and Project Blue Book, its official inquiries into unidentified aerial phenomena (UFOs). It is home to the Air Force Research Laboratory and the 711th Human Performance Wing, whose centrifuge trained American and European astronauts as recently as 2025. The US Space proposal places the NASA-Civilian academy on Area B, near those two missions. The 711th studies the human being as a system operating at the edge of physical limits in advanced aircraft and space. Will the US Space Academy also study the human being at the edge of consciousness limits too? The Institute for Exoconsciousness invites the developers of the US Space Academy to acknowledge humanity’s fundamental right to consciousness, advances in our evolving interstellar identity, and development of a curriculum inclusive of our innate ability for cosmic contact, communication, and co-creation. Our species’ expansion into space mandates that human sovereignty, psychic abilities, agency, creativity, and morality are held as primary alongside advanced communication, propulsion, energy systems, weaponry, craft, cybersecurity systems, AI computation, and robotics. Space is more than a collection of satellites in a computer-driven, digital war zone, inhabited by a hybridized transhuman species. Space is a human domain that is expressed, explored, and established through an innate cosmic consciousness connection. What the Academy Plans Include. What They Could Include. The Ohio proposal is ambitious. It describes a $300 million “multiplanetary hall” roughly the size of four football fields for academics and research, a road lined with statues of Ohio’s astronauts and aviators, a golf course designed by Jack Nicklaus, and a grand entrance called the Plus Ultra Gate. It would begin with perhaps 200 cadets and grow to about 5,000, trained as officers in the nation’s newest NASA-led institution. Plus Ultra means “further beyond.” It was the motto of explorers who sailed past what the ancient world considered the edge of the map. Our ancestors ruled the globe from the seas; today, our plans may be to rule the globe from space. Plus Ultra is the right motto. But further beyond what? A US Space Academy will teach orbital mechanics, propulsion, satellite operations, and space domain awareness. The officers it produces will also b

  5. Sep 22

    The Moon Is Becoming a Battleground. Where Is Humanity’s Constitution?

    The Institute for Exoconsciousness celebrates the second anniversary of the Planetary Constitution as humanity enters an unprecedented public space era * Permanent Lunar Infrastructure and International Exoconscious Coalition * Expanding Cislunar Activity and Exoconscious Beneficial Lunar Opportunity * Acknowledged Orbital Weapons and the Place of Plasma Science * Government Investigation of UAP and Exoconscious Human Intelligence The Planetary Constitution, created two years ago, acknowledges humanity's fundamental right to consciousness, advances our evolving interstellar identity, and affirms our innate ability for cosmic contact, communication, and co-creation. Our expansion into space mandates that human sovereignty, psychic abilities, agency, creativity, and morality are held as primary alongside AI computation, robotics, and weapons. Space is more than a collection of satellites in a computer-driven, digital war zone, inhabited by a hybridized transhuman species. Space is a human domain that is expressed, explored, and established through an innate cosmic consciousness connection. The Institute for Exoconsciousness’ Planetary Constitution is foundational for peaceful, cooperative, and conscious interspecies relations. This Substack will examine military space advancements and recent public announcements through the lens of Exoconscious Humans, referencing the Planetary Constitution. US Permanent Lunar Infrastructure in a Crowded International Landscape On Sunday, September 6, 2026, President Trump posted the “THE MOON IS OURS” image announcement on Truth Social. Six years earlier, in September 2020, NASA formally announced its plan for Artemis Base Camp near the Moon’s south pole. The base camp concept calls for a surface habitat that can host up to four astronauts, an unpressurized and a pressurized rover, plus infrastructure for power, communications, and living accommodations. Since then, NASA selected the Shackleton–de Gerlache Ridge, whose rim stays sunlit more than 90% of the year and is located near ice craters. Crowded Lunar South Pole Trump’s abrupt social post reverberated through an already crowded international social and political landscape. China, Russia, India, and Japan have lunar south pole projects and long histories of lunar exploration. United StatesApollo legacy; Artemis program underway; multiple commercial lunar landings achieved; actively developing sustained lunar infrastructure. ChinaChang’e lunar program ongoing; successful far-side sample return already achieved; developing future crewed lunar capability. RussiaSoviet-era lunar heritage; the Luna program continues; the Luna-25 attempt failed in 2023. IndiaChandrayaan-3 successfully landed in 2023 near the lunar south pole. JapanSLIM achieved a lunar soft landing; additional lunar and commercial lunar activity underway. Exoconscious Humans Coalition: Lunar Presence Opportunity A vibrant and growing international presence on the Moon’s South Pole creates an opportunity to form an Exoconscious international coalition represented by the US, China, Russia, India, and Japan to support the Planetary Constitution and advance human rights and peaceful, cooperative, and conscious interspecies relations. Planetary Constitution: We, the People of the Planet Earth, in Order to form a more perfect Interplanetary Global Union, establish Justice, ensure domestic Tranquility, provide for the Common Defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity as a Human Race, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States and Planet Earth. WHEREAS: 1. Natural human Consciousness is a fundamental and precious Right of all Humans and embodies the inalienable human rights to Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Health and Happiness; Expanding Cislunar Commercial Activity NASA described the Moon Base development involving multiple commercial companies that deliver science, technology, and infrastructure. According to NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine: After 20 years of continuously living in low-Earth orbit, we're now ready for the next great challenge of space exploration — the development of a sustained presence on and around the Moon…For years to come, Artemis will serve as our North Star as we continue to work toward even greater exploration of the Moon, where we will demonstrate key elements needed for the first human mission to Mars. Planetary Constitution: 3. Non-Human entities, both Natural and Artificial, have historically and currently interacted with governments and individuals of the human race on Planet Earth; 4. Humans have the Ability and Intention to explore Outer Space, including other planets, moons, dimensions, and celestial bodies; 5. Space Exploration increases the likelihood of increased interactions with unknown types and species of Non-Human entities; Exoconscious Humans: Beneficial Lunar Opportunity As international commercial opportunities expand to build Moon bases, our International Space Coalition will advance the need to include Exoconscious Humans with psychic intelligence and interspecies communication abilities in space exploration and base establishment. Alongside countries with established space programs, inclusion can also extend to underrepresented space countries in Africa and the Caribbean. Dr. Claire Nelson is a Jamaican-American futurist, engineer, and founding convenor of the Space Futures Forum. She also founded the Open Afrika Space Exploration Analog Simulation and co-founded the Caribbean Space Society. Acknowledged Orbital Weapons, Moon Battles, and Exoconscious Interspecies Cooperation The September 2026 Air, Space and Cyber Conference presentations cited global news of US orbital weapons—the first public acknowledgment of weapons in space. The news may have signaled the US abandonment of the Outer Space Treaty of 1967, which the U.S. signed, that outlaws certain military behaviors on the Moon and states that it shall be used “exclusively for peaceful purposes.” The UN Office of Outer Space Affairs will examine the legalities. September 14, 2026: The US has on-orbit space control defense weapons From Secretary of the Air Force Troy Meink’s keynote address at the 2026 Air, Space and Cyber Conference: We are increasing readiness against existing threats, and the United States has on-orbit space control weapons capable of defending the Joint Force against hostile adversary action. Sec AF discloses U.S. has on-orbit space-control weapons In his address, Meink further addressed space control and weaponry Shifting from long-standing secrecy, the Space Force began openly discussing orbital warfare in 2025, establishing a framework that defines ‘space control’ as actions to ‘destroy, disrupt or degrade adversary space platforms’ using kinetic or non-kinetic effects. Why on-orbital and not in-orbital language? Where is Plasma in the Preposition? While on-orbital follows the Space Force language of space control, it raises the grammatical question: why use this specific preposition of place? In-orbital indicates a state-of-matter enclosure, and on-orbital indicates resting on a surface in space. So what state of matter does space control refer to? What state of matter is being controlled, and possibly destroyed, disrupted, or degraded in adversary space platforms using kinetic or non-kinetic effects? Are plasma weapons operating ON a plasma surface of space? Could the language indicate that the defense weapons have a plasma component that moves on plasma space? Since 99% of the universe is plasma—the fourth state—does the Space Force's defense-weapons language indicate that they interpret their space technology as resting on a plasma surface, rather than moving within a plasma state? Join our Plasma Study Group to explore these questions. September 16, 2026: Preparation for Moon battles The Pentagon must prepare for battles around the moon: Joint Chiefs Chair General Dan Caine’s keynote address as Chair of the Joint Chiefs on Wednesday, September 16, 2026, at the Air & Space Forces Association’s Air, Space & Cyber Conference emphasized that the Pentagon must prepare for battles around the moon. Our task, my friends, is to adapt right now, so the Joint Force is prepared to fight, endure, and win, in global contested environments, from the seabed to cislunar space,” Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dan Caine told airmen, guardians, and industry figures. What is General Caine’s Moon battlefield? Moon or Space? What is Cislunar? U.S. law is ambiguous, defining cislunar space as “the region of space from the Earth out to and including the region around the surface of the moon.” At least one Harvard Law Journal article interprets the clause as meaning the moon itself, and the White House’s National Cislunar Science and Technology Action Plan explicitly said in late 2024 that it includes the lunar surface. But the Air Force Research Laboratory’s 2021 “Primer on Cislunar Space” appears to treat space and the moon’s surface as two different domains. Whether on the Moon's surface or in the region of space between Earth and the Moon, the Planetary Constitution is essential as the foundation for peaceful, cooperative, and conscious interspecies relations. Space, filled with satellites, infrastructure, weapons, geo-engineering, and plasma, as well as the Moon’s surface, is regarded by the Planetary Constitution as an intelligent, cosmic field in which Contactees and Experiencers can interact and co-create. It is not simply a field for battle, eventual occupation, and colonization; it is alive and filled with multitudes of intelligences. Exoconscious Humans are required for any nation’s venture into space or establishment of a lunar base. As the Planetary Constitution emphasizes, our inclusion elevates interspecies communication and cooperation. Planetary Constitution: NOW,

  6. Sep 17

    Demons, Angels, Plasma and Guardians of Earth

    What if plasma is more than a fourth state-of-matter phenomenon? What if Plasma is a spiritual and cosmic phenomenon that ancient religious traditions recognized and studied? Join us this Saturday, September 19, at 1:00 pm EDT for our Plasma Science Study Group on Zoom or receive the recording. You can join with an $8 monthly paid Substack subscription. This Saturday, we explore Joseph P. Farrell’s book The Demon in the Ekur: Angels, Demons, Plasmas, and Pyramids. Our conversation will bring together plasma science, ancient theology, consciousness, mythology, and Exoconsciousness. We'll ponder some fascinating questions. Joseph Farrell himself may join us! Come curious, bring your questions, and join us as we explore new intersections of plasma science. Bring your open mind, critical thinking, imagination, and love of ancient history and tradition seen in a new light. Reading guidelines and Discussion Questions: 1. Classical Theology and Plasma Science Theory Farrell maps a possible connection between plasma properties and a classical theological approach to angels and demons: * Immaterial materiality/matter penetration—plasma passing through a solid copper plate * Sempiternity—Complex plasma helices can bifurcate, replicate, form memory (Kordylewski Clouds) * Nonlocal Presence: Plasma quantum entanglement and self-organizing * Regional Guardianship: St. John of Damascus theology of specific planets and regions having angelic oversight. Could these regions be overseen via Plasma? * Wordless Communication: Divine messages are telepathic and similar to how biophotons and electromagnetics communicate without sound. Which of these properties do you view as valuable for plasma science and theology? How do these properties relate to your view of demons and angels? 2. Farrell’s Great Pyramid Theory: Across several heavily referenced previous books, Farrell argues that the Great Pyramid, as it stands today, is a dismantled weapon of mass destruction. In Demon in the Ekur, he adds that Plasma is inorganic intelligent life and that these plasma intelligences or forces may have operated pyramid structures. How did Farrell’s view of the Great Pyramid as a dismantled weapon of mass destruction alter your perspective? * Christopher Dunn’s hypothesis of hydrogen gas in the Great Pyramid * Sumerian cuneiform contains a sign for the bond of heaven and earth * How do you distinguish myth, Gods, weapons, and forces of being * Did the addition of Plasma intelligent life and forces further alter your perspective of ancient mythology? 3. Spiritual Plasma Body: Farrell discusses the plasma life hypothesis, which corresponds to our astral, etheric, and spiritual body and may emit biophotons that let us monitor others and be monitored ourselves. Farrell speculates on the Kordylewski Cloud as a potential monitoring system, an akashic record of everything and everyone. * Were ancient theologians aware of a cosmic intelligence property that we are just now discovering? * How does this apply to Exoconsciousness and contact experiences, as well as psychic skills like remote viewing and clairvoyance? * How permeable is the boundary between organic and inorganic (plasma) life? * Does this strengthen the practice of Exoconscious inner knowing to access an inner plasma state to communicate with outer plasma states? 4. Demon as Fallen Being If the planetary guardian of Earth was “fallen,” how does this relate to political pronouncements of ET as Evil, ET as Demon? Genesis Chapter 6 describes a fallen race of giants—pre and post flood. Are living lineages of giants being identified as demons? Please join us with a Paid Subscription. See you Saturday. Exoconscious Humans is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. What is Exoconsciousness? Learn more here. If you’re drawn to Exoconscious Humans’ perceptions—please join us. We welcome you! We welcome your support! We welcome your energy, excitement, ideas, and experiences. Interested in Plasma Science? JOIN US! The Plasma Science Study Group meets monthly on Zoom for paid Substack subscribers at $8/month. We’re investigating the science connecting UAPs, consciousness, biology, and the cosmos. The science that experiencers have always intuited. Exoconscious Humans is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. See our latest Fourth State Plasma Science Substack Rebecca Hardcastle Wright, PhD, is the founder of the Institute for Exoconsciousness (I-EXO) and the originator of Exoconsciousness—the innate human ability to connect, communicate, and co-create with extraterrestrials, multidimensionals, and spiritual beings. A futurist, author, and educator, she advocates for natural human consciousness, innate psychic intelligence, and individual moral sovereignty amidst the era of artificial intelligence, synthetic realities, and engineered social control. Subscribe to our YouTube: Join our Exoconscious Humans Podcast Join us on Social Media: https://www.facebook.com/exoconscious https://www.instagram.com/exoconsciousness/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/exoconsciousness/ https://x.com/exoconscious Get full access to Exoconscious Humans at rebeccahardcastlewright.substack.com/subscribe

  7. Sep 10

    A Tale of Two Ufology Courses: 2026 and 2005

    One way to see how profoundly the UAP conversation changed from Experiencer meaning and independent research to national security preparation for a UAP threat is to compare two college courses: one taught in 2005 and one offered in Fall 2026. Twenty-one years ago, Extraterrestrial Reality, a UFOlogy course I taught, asked students to expand on what it means to be human in the 21st century, with a focus on intelligent, responsive life originating beyond Earth. Today, a new UAP course, Homeland Security and UAPs, educates Criminal Justice students in security threat detection, FEMA preparedness protocols, and law enforcement response to UAPs — without a single piece of evidence that ET poses a threat to anyone. Disclosure replaced Exoconscious cosmic integration with national emergency preparedness, reflecting its emphasis on national security, science, and data collection. Understanding how course content changed is essential to understanding why Exoconscious Humans must speak out now. These courses represent two different visions of what humanity should be preparing for and how humans integrate contact. They represent two different versions of the role that human consciousness and the experiencer may play in the future of UAP understanding. Exoconsciousness does not require abandoning UAP science or cautious data collection. It argues that both material investigation and research into human consciousness must be pursued in tandem to fully enable human evolution. A Tale of Two Ufology Courses: 2026 and 2005 The recent Disclosure pivot to Homeland Security preparedness and why the Exoconscious are speaking up now were covered in a previous Ontological Shock and Awe Substack. In this Substack, I share a Tale of Two Ufology Courses. The two chart different courses, with radically different intended outcomes, but they're not irreconcilable. 2026: UAPs and Homeland Security Course In a September 1, 2026, X Post, Avi Loeb, Chair of the UAP Science Advisory Council, applauded Dr. Keith L. Taylor’s course, UAP’s and Homeland Security, offered at Farmingdale State College, New York, in Criminal Justice Studies. Dr. Taylor has experience with emergency preparedness, including weapons of mass destruction, FEMA, and law enforcement. From Avi Loeb’s X: The new course, examining UAP through science, public safety, national security, and policy. Serious academic courses and scientific research are essential to reducing stigma and advancing rigorous, evidence-based study of UAP. From Farmingdale Announcement: This course is intended to address matters of airspace safety and domestic security threats—regardless of what the sources of UAPs are (e.g., human or non-human, where examples of the former include the 2023 “Chinese balloon incident” or the recent drone attacks across the globe), law enforcement agencies and first responders should be prepared to safely engage with such objects should they pose a threat to US airspace. The course will address policies, protocols, planning strategies and proposed legislation to address the detection and investigation of UAPs. The course will be taught by an expert with experience in law enforcement and emergency preparedness (Dr. Keith Taylor) and will feature case studies and guest speakers that are experts in UAP detection and investigation. I wish Keith Taylor all the Best. Leading figures such as Avi Loeb and Jordan Flowers of the Disclosure Foundation lauded his course. However, Taylor’s law-enforcement focus on UAP detection and investigation broadens the intelligence, military, and government Disclosure edict to “Homeland Security” and its post-9/11, post-COVID implications. Homeland Security Broadens UAP Threat—Implications without Evidence * The course frames UAP Studies as the protection of the Homeland from UAP/ET attacks. Homeland UAP course strategies may duplicate the protocols for Homeland Security’s FEMA preparedness and protection during fires, floods, earthquakes, explosions, manmade terrorism, and technological disasters. * The course may introduce young adults to the need to design and implement strategies and protocols in response to a hypothetical UAP/ET interstellar attack on U.S. airspace. Is this a deliberate attempt to train university students to view ET as a national security danger, rather than as natural, cosmic, multidimensional beings that have related to humans throughout their history, especially psychically aware Exoconscious citizens? * The course assumes a Homeland Security UAP attack WITHOUT any evidence or accompanying data of a potential threat from the government, the Pentagon, Intelligence, the UAP Science Advisory Council, or the Disclosure Foundation. Are Homeland UAP Protocols applicable to Exoconscious Humans? Does the Homeland Security and UAPs course, with its FEMA-like science, public safety, national security, and policy framing, jeopardize and marginalize Exoconsciousness, an innate human ability to connect, communicate, and co-create with extraterrestrials, multidimensionals, and spiritual beings? If so, this raises critical issues: * ET as a terror threat is a potentially unjust and unethical characterization of Exoconscious Humans. Entraining university students to pay for a course to teach them to view ET and their natural Exoconscious abilities as a Homeland threat is yet another means of shutting down natural human consciousness. * ET as a terror threat functions as a potential university-student mind-control meme, a further cover-up, and another diversion to prevent any Disclosure of secret technology—all without evidence. Will Exclusion of Experiencer Knowledge Limit young minds as well as the Academic and Scientific Contribution to Ufology? If so, there are course alternatives and additions. 2005: Extraterrestrial Reality Course In late 2004, I submitted a course proposal to Scottsdale Community College to teach Extraterrestrial Reality in their Continuing Education department. It integrated UFO history, leading individuals, and contactee witnesses. The Extraterrestrial Reality course was accepted and scheduled for early 2005. At the time, only a handful of people taught UFOlogy courses. In 2004, Aaron Clark taught UFOlogy at Oberlin College (where John Mack and Bud Hopkins previously attended). In 2005, excitement was building around acceptance of academic UFOlogy courses that integrated history, science, and consciousness. If you had asked me in 2005, I thought we would have courses throughout the nation in no time. But it wasn’t to be. Aaron’s Facebook UFO Educators group maintains a historical record of college and university Ufology courses. My Scottsdale course generated a good deal of local publicity and was featured on every morning and evening Phoenix newscast, as well as in a featured article in the Phoenix New Times on January 13, 2005, titled “Space Crash Course.“ Rebecca Hardcastle isn’t from outer space. But she might be from a different dimension, one that transcends time and space and most college curricula. We can thank our lucky stars that Hardcastle has landed at Scottsdale Community College, which now offers her Extraterrestrial Reality course as part of its Continuing Education program. According to the course book, Hardcastle’s class “expands on what it means to be human in the 21st century, relating to intelligent, responsive life originating beyond Earth.” The class filled. Many of the students were Experiencers, and most were Ufology literate, having studied the phenomenon for years. Extraterrestrial Reality Backstory But, as with any initiative, there was also an interesting backstory. When I proposed the course, I was a member of Dr. Ruth Hover’s Contactee group in Fountain Hills, AZ. Ruth worked with John Mack and Leo Sprinkle to establish psychological protocols for working with Experiencers. I told Ruth I planned to submit a course proposal, and several weeks later I was called to her house, where several prominent Phoenix-area ufologists were gathered. They conducted an intervention with me, trying to convince me of the dangers of teaching a ufology class, as I was a single mother raising three children. I thanked them for their concern and said that I was safe and planned to proceed. Little did I know that my danger lay with a citizen who wrote a letter to the college president demanding that my course be canceled. Extraterrestrial Reality lasted one semester. And my hopes for national Ufology courses faded. How and Why did Ufology Course Offerings Dramatically Change? In 21 years, Ufology course offerings shifted from UFO history and “expanding on what it means to be human in the 21st century, relating to intelligent, responsive life originating beyond Earth” to Homeland UAP threat detection and investigation, prioritizing science, public safety, national security, and policy with a para-FEMA law enforcement preparation course. Quite an epistemological leap from integrated understanding to material science data certainty without accompanying evidence. Yet the military, intelligence agencies, and scientists involved in ufology seem certain enough of a looming threat to develop protocols, preventive measures, population-level data, and mass societal perception. Exoconscious Aware Citizens amid Disclosure “Steering” Disclosure, defined by military, intelligence, science, and now academics, emphasizes data, AI, surveillance, and measurement used to “steer” social control over large masses. This steering is cybernetic and uses cultural experiments to measure and meter human behavior—achieving mass solutions for mass culture. According to the SOL Foundation’s scientific study, “the methods we employ could transform the study of encounters with UAP by broadening the focus to include not only individual reports and testimony but population-level data and mass, societal perception.” A major Macy conference titled “Circular

  8. Sep 8

    Ontological “Shock and Awe” Disclosure--Sound Familiar?

    “But first, can you see the beginnings of cybernetics as steering the human into designated behaviors of closed loops? In other words, cybernetics as a means of social control. Social control through social engineering.” Exoconscious Humans: Will Free Will Survive in an Increasingly Non Human World? Disclosure Needs Exoconscious Aware Citizens The UAP disclosure conversation is increasingly institutional, technological, and threat-oriented. Disclosure, defined by military, intelligence, science, and now academics, emphasizes data, AI, surveillance, and measurement used to “steer” social control over large masses. This steering is cybernetic and uses cultural experiments to measure and meter human behavior—achieving mass solutions for mass culture. As this Substack explains, the national security UAP emphasis has become Homeland Security, high-alert preparedness, and Ontological Shock and Awe. This is a dangerous reach for Disclosure. It implies shenanigans and ops that we’re all familiar with, as we’ve watched them unfold in 911 events, COVID, unidentified drone swarms, and engineered weather catastrophes. Exoconsciousness introduces the missing human, consciousness, experiential, ethical, spiritual, philosophical, and planetary dimensions of Disclosure. Exoconscious Humans and aligned ufology researchers are building a significant culture that embraces both subjective experiential and objective scientific knowledge of cosmic, multidimensional, and spiritual being through a mature, integrative message rather than an ET emergency. Without the integration of Exoconsciousness, scientific UAP Disclosure resorts to threat-based and national-security-emergency narratives, shutting down transparency, truth, and opportunities for the natural evolution of human Cosmic and Earth consciousness. Exoconsciousness does not require abandoning UAP science or cautious data collection. It argues that both material investigation and research into human consciousness must be pursued in tandem to fully enable human evolution. Natural Human Consciousness or High Alert UAP Emergency Exoconscious Humans who experience and integrate contact, communication, and co-creation with craft, beings, and anomalous phenomena represent a growing number of citizens. They share ideas and tools for calmly and peacefully integrating these experiences. Our human body, mind, and spirit are equipped to integrate and successfully live in the natural and supernatural world without institutional control. ET is not a high-alert emergency; ET does not require a new dogma, doctrine, or institution. Instead, ET represents an innate connection of human consciousness. Thus, new science, innovations, and ways of relating to the Earth and Cosmos will result. A major Exoconscious transition will involve citizens developing internal discernment rather than institutional control and dependence. We focus on the meaning of contact that is naturally discovered and integrated by each individual. We focus on what it means to be human in the 21st century, relating to intelligent, responsive life originating beyond Earth. We Spoke Out in 2017: Why Speak Out Now After the 2017 NYT article and the occupation of Ufology by intelligence, military, and government, our Exoconscious Community created a press release response. 2017 Press Release: Extraterrestrial Experiencers See ET Presence as an Opportunity, Not a Threat. The press release was easily ignored. However, our historical response remains on record. Since 2017, year after year, I watched former colleagues and professional researchers pivot toward the intelligence, military, and government perspective on Ufology and Disclosure, framed as a national security issue. No one questioned where the national security framing would lead. No one gave forethought to the future eventualities of a threat narrative. But now we know. National Security framing led to the marginalization of Experiencers, ET being demonized, and support for advanced weapons and surveillance in space. Unfortunately, it also led to embarrassment for Experiencers and the few remaining independent Ufology researchers, appalled by the government, podcast, and press club antics—ceiling chandeliers, crop irrigation circles, and blips on computer screens, along with dramatic tales of hitchhikers from black-magic amateurs fooling around. Ufology became an embarrassment. Silly. And rightly so. It’s time to speak out again. UAP Threat Narrative: Taking Next Step Since the New York Times article, December 2017, "Glowing Auras and 'Black Money': The Pentagon's Mysterious U.F.O. Program," ufology has become increasingly dominated by scientists, experts, and professionals touting the UAP threat narrative. Currently, we are witnessing a dangerous next step in the threat narrative that involves information on Homeland Security, preparedness, prevention, and public safety policy. This information moves the Disclosure threat narrative “closer to home,” involving threat prevention, procedure policy, engineering, and shock-and-awe space weapons. “Homeland Security” and preparedness language keep citizens on high alert, increasing their fear and vulnerability to terrorism, weather events, natural and man-made disasters, unknown lethal weapons, and UAP. As a result of high alert, humans shut down, go into denial, or develop fantasies to avoid facing reality. No progress is possible. No human growth and knowledge is possible. Homeland Colleagues Prepping Preparation Policy is not unusual for governments. But the sudden coalescence of UAP organizations focusing on preparedness raises the question of whether a military/intelligence talking point or directive was circulated and whether grants were distributed to raise the UAP threat temperature. That’s also not unusual. It frequently happens in institutions. Here are examples of the “preparedness” talking points that are evident in ufology. National UAP Threat Preparedness Framework Disclosure Foundation Please note the broad government, institutional focus. The Disclosure Foundation released a National Preparedness Framework for the Human Consequences of Disclosure, authored by @JenniceVilhauer , PhD, Carlos Eire, PhD, and @ChrisKMellon. The brief recommends that the Administration establish a National Disclosure Preparedness Task Force within the @HHSGov to strengthen the nation’s psychological and societal readiness for the human consequences of UAP disclosure.Within 120 days of its establishment, the Task Force would publish an unclassified National Disclosure Preparedness Strategy for use by federal, state, and local governments, healthcare systems, educational institutions, and the public. https://disclosure.org/research/a-national-preparedness-framework-for-the-human-consequences-of-disclosure The US Government Has a Preparedness Plan in Case of NHI Disclosure, by Jennice Vilhauer Please note the US international leadership role. At a meeting held on August 31, 2026, at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the UAP Science Advisory Council, of which I am a member, was informed that the United States government has a preparedness plan in place should the existence of nonhuman intelligence (NHI) be confirmed. We were also told that the United States is prepared to take an international leadership role if necessary. SOL Foundation Disclosure: Crucial Guidance Please note the connection to COVID epidemiology and cybernetic study resulting in population-level data, and mass societal perception. The Sol Foundation is launching a scientific study that will provide crucial guidance to both the President and Congress on how to conduct disclosure successfully and with minimal harm. This innovative study, led by epidemiologist (a public health scientist who investigates the patterns, causes, and control of diseases and injuries in populations) Dr. Christopher Salazar and Dr. Peter Skafish, will help us understand, for the very first time, how Americans are likely to respond to different aspects of UAP disclosure announcements, including who delivers the news, what evidence is presented, how that evidence is verified, and how the message is framed. (refining talking points)Additionally, the methods we employ could transform the study of encounters with UAP by broadening the focus to include not only individual reports and testimony but population-level data and mass, societal perception. Sounds like Prevention and Planning for a Repeat of Ontological Shock and Awe on a Global Scale These preparedness studies and policies echo the COVID pandemic plans put in place years before the virus was released. Does Ufology want to follow in these footsteps? If so, why? Interesting that FEMA and HHS coordinated COVID pandemic preparedness policies, inspired by government, universities, and the World Economic Forum-run planning scenarios. Are we witnessing a similar framework locked into place with Homeland Security UAP and Preparedness? If so, one important question remains unaddressed and unanswered in a 911, COVID-type planned operation. Who becomes the Homeland Terrorist? Who is labeled the scapegoat in the scenario planning? These implied and unanswered questions become personal Homeland Security and prevention planning leave massive unaddressed questions. We’ve all been down this threat narrative road. All of the signs are appearing. You can’t miss them. We can deny the question of who becomes the terrorist—or face it head-on before plans force citizens into another controlled narrative that the Sol Foundation defines as population-level data and mass, societal perception preparation. The message of terrorism and fear lands directly on the doorstep of Experiencers. Who is identified as the terrorist in a Homeland Security UAP event? A demonic ET? An asteroid? A “nation of concern”? A rogue pilot? A secret lab? A rogue infected bat? Multiple peop

See All (32)

About

Where Psychic Contactees Co-Create their Lives, the Earth, and our Cosmic Future rebeccahardcastlewright.substack.com

Information

  • Creator
    Rebecca Hardcastle Wright, PhD
  • Years Active
    2026
  • Episodes
    32
  • Rating
    Clean
  • Copyright
    © Rebecca Hardcastle Wright, PhD
  • Show Website
    Exoconscious Humans Podcast