Welcome back to the dispute.ae podcast. I’m Paul, and this is Episode 38. In the last episode, we built the escrow and payment trail. Today, we move from the ledger to the unit: what happens when a snag is marked “closed,” but the problem is still there? As always, this is general information, not legal advice. A buyer identifies 27 snags. Later, the developer’s portal shows 24 as closed. But on inspection, a pipe still leaks, a door still does not close, and a damaged tile has been filled rather than replaced. The issue is no longer simply what defects existed. The question becomes: what was reported, what work was attempted, and was the same condition properly retested? A snag list is only a snapshot. A repair-history file tracks each defect from first observation through notice, acknowledgement, access, attempted repair and retest. Start with the source documents: SPA, specifications, plans, handover notice, inspection records, snagging report and access records. Keep clean originals. Next, create one defect register. Give every snag a stable ID, such as kitchen-01 or bathroom-02. Record its location, condition, date observed, photographs or videos, notification date, ticket number, developer response, access dates, reported work, retest date and current status. Keep descriptions factual. “Water visible below the kitchen sink after the tap runs for three minutes” is stronger evidence than “major plumbing failure.” Photographs should show context and detail. Keep original files and link them to the relevant defect ID. For leaks, noise or intermittent faults, video may provide a clearer record. Preserve every portal submission, email, ticket number and access appointment. After repair work, retest the same defect. If the portal says “closed,” save that status—but remember: a closed ticket shows what the system recorded. It does not itself prove the physical condition was resolved. Keep quotations, inspection fees, emergency repairs and other costs separately. Do not automatically label them recoverable; responsibility and remedies require case-specific analysis. Dubai Law No. 6 of 2019, Article 40 addresses certain structural defects and defective installations, but those provisions are not a universal deadline or remedy for every snag. The SPA, handover documents, technical evidence, dates and applicable law still matter. For immediate safety risks—such as active flooding, exposed electrical components or fire-safety concerns—use the appropriate emergency or building channels and obtain qualified assistance. The administrative goal is simple: one defect register, one evidence folder, one notice history, one access log and one retest record. Remember: a snag list shows what was observed once. A repair-history file shows what happened next. Next episode: can a DLD or RERA complaint obtain a contractual property refund? Thanks for listening. Full transcript at transcript.ae. For pre-legal dispute support, visit dispute.ae.