Walk With Me

Giovanni Dejesus
  • 5.0 (4)
  • Social Sciences

Walk With Me is a podcast for people who feel stuck, misaligned, or disconnected from their lives despite doing the “work.” It helps them understand the internal pillars, patterns, and beliefs shaping their reality so they can create real, lasting change. Unlike traditional self-improvement or manifestation content, Dr. Giovanni DeJesus DC, MSPP, focuses on systems over quick fixes, blending logical breakdowns with honest conversation to help people stop performing growth and start understanding the version of themselves creating their life. Walk With Me — because you can’t change your life until you understand the version of you creating it.

  1. 5d ago

    Busy, But Not Starting

    Send us Fan Mail How can you stay busy all day and still put off the thing that matters most? Sometimes procrastination doesn't look like doing nothing. It looks like answering emails, researching, organizing, planning, cleaning, helping everybody else, and somehow never beginning the task you originally sat down to do. In this episode of Walk With Me, Dr. Gio explores the gap between intention and action. Instead of assuming procrastination is always laziness, fear, poor discipline, emotional avoidance, or a nervous-system response, we ask a more useful question: Why was everything else easier to start than this? Because the same delay can happen for very different reasons. The task may feel unpleasant. The next action may be unclear. Your attention may have moved somewhere easier. You may genuinely be depleted. Starting may be harder for you than staying with something once you're engaged. Or the task may have become about much more than the task itself. The application becomes the possibility of rejection. The first video becomes proof of whether you're really a creator. The proposal becomes a test of whether you're competent. And as Gio puts it in the episode: Potential is undefeated. As long as the work stays in your head, reality hasn't had a chance to respond. This walk explores procrastination without pretending there is one explanation that applies to everyone. We look at the task itself, the moment you're trying to begin, and the meaning you've attached to the work. Then we bring in the Walk With Me Internal Architecture: Awareness: What actually happened? Mind: What was I telling myself? Capacity: Do I reasonably have room for this right now? Identity: What have I made this task mean about me? Behavior: What did I actually do? Eventually, understanding has to meet behavior. So rather than demanding that you finish the whole project, this episode leaves you with a smaller question: What action would actually connect you with the thing? Open the document. Write the sentence. Send the email. Make the call. The first move doesn't need to solve everything. Its job is to cross the line into action. Research Behind the Walk Research informing this episode includes: Piers Steel (2007), The Nature of Procrastination, a foundational meta-analysis examining predictors including task aversiveness, self-efficacy, impulsivity, distractibility, and self-regulation. DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65 A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis of 88 studies and more than 63,000 participants examining the association between procrastination and depression, anxiety, and stress. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1624094 Sæle et al. (2026), examining procrastination and self-reported difficulties with task initiation and other metacognitive abilities in a healthy adult sample. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-026-04221-1 Garg, Shelat & Schooler (2025), testing a brief intervention involving task appraisal, subtask generation, and reward selection. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-025-03388-3 Garg & Schooler (2026), examining task structuring, immediate engagement, reinforcement, and persistence during work on real procrastinated tasks. DOI: 10.3390/bs16101832 Sheeran, Listrom & Gollwitzer (2025), a meta-analysis of 642 tests of implementation intentions and if-then planning. DOI: 10.1080/10463283.2024.2334563 The research points toward multiple influences rather than one universal explanation for procrastination, which is why this walk focuses on understanding the particular obstacle before deciding what response fits. So here's the question to walk with: What is making this particular thing harder to begin than everything you're doing instead, and what action would mean you've actually started? Follow the show so we can keep walking together. Want to see the face behind the voice and additional content not shared on the podcast? click the links below, ike and subscribe and most importantly engage with me. I read every comment and reply.  https://www.youtube.com/@RisetoReclaim-gio https://www.facebook.com/giovanni.f.dejesus/ https://www.instagram.com/giovanni.f.dejesus/

  2. Oct 26

    When Awareness Isn't Enough | Emotional Triggers, Reactions, and Repair

    Send us Fan Mail  Why do you still react when you already know your emotional triggers? Recognizing what's happening is awareness. Being able to influence what happens next is part of emotion regulation. And what you actually say or do is behavior. Those things are connected but they aren't identical. In this episode of Walk With Me, Dr. Gio explores the space between knowing your patterns and actually responding differently when a conversation becomes emotionally charged. We follow one argument before, during, and after the reaction. You know you're becoming defensive. You can hear your voice changing. Part of you recognizes exactly where the conversation is going. Somehow, you still say the thing. So what happened between knowing and doing? We explore why stress can make some forms of flexible thinking harder without pretending that emotion makes us helpless, how our interpretation of someone else's words can become the conversation we're actually responding to, and why your first warning sign may not be anger at all. Sometimes the signal is simpler: Curiosity disappeared. You stopped listening. You started preparing your defense. That may be an earlier place where something different becomes possible. This walk doesn't stop at emotional regulation. Because sometimes we don't catch the reaction. Sometimes somebody gets hurt. That's where we explore repair, accountability, apology, and one of the central ideas of this episode: You can be right about what hurt you and still be responsible for how you responded. Understanding why you reacted matters. It just doesn't automatically erase the impact. In this walk You'll explore the difference between emotional awareness, emotion regulation, and behavior; how stress and context can affect the responses available to us; the role of Awareness, the Nervous System—the “Hallway Monitor”—Capacity, and Behavior within the Walk With Me Internal Architecture; recognizing earlier warning signs; using simple pre-planned responses when appropriate; and what meaningful repair can require after conflict. This episode does not assume every situation is the same. Ordinary relationship conflict, mental health challenges, coercion, intimidation, and abuse require very different considerations. Safety comes before preserving a relationship or producing the “perfect” emotionally regulated response. Research behind the walk This episode draws on research including: Scheffel & Gärtner (2025), The Role of Cognitive Effort in Emotion Regulation, which reviews identification, selection, implementation, and monitoring across the emotion-regulation process. DOI: 10.1007/s42761-025-00324-x Shields, Sazma & Yonelinas (2016), The Effects of Acute Stress on Core Executive Functions: A Meta-Analysis and Comparison with Cortisol, examining how acute stress affects working memory, cognitive flexibility, and different forms of inhibition. PMID: 27371161 Sheeran, Listrom & Gollwitzer (2025), The When and How of Planning, a meta-analysis of 642 tests of implementation intentions—or “if-then” planning—across cognitive, emotional, and behavioral outcomes. DOI: 10.1080/10463283.2024.2334563 Lewicki, Polin & Lount (2016), An Exploration of the Structure of Effective Apologies, examining components of apologies including acknowledgment of responsibility and offers of repair. DOI: 10.1111/ncmr.12073 Research provides useful models and evidence, but no single study can explain every person's reaction, relationship, or path to repair. So here's the question to walk with: Now that I recognize my pattern, what am I willing to do differently, and what responsibility remains when I don't? Subscribe and follow wherever you listen so we can keep walking together. Want to see the face behind the voice and additional content not shared on the podcast? click the links below, ike and subscribe and most importantly engage with me. I read every comment and reply.  https://www.youtube.com/@RisetoReclaim-gio https://www.facebook.com/giovanni.f.dejesus/ https://www.instagram.com/giovanni.f.dejesus/

  3. Oct 19 ·  Bonus

    BONUS: Understanding the Manosphere | Why So Many Men Feel Invisible

    Send us Fan Mail  Why has the manosphere become so influential with men searching for masculinity, confidence, purpose, and self-worth? This week has been quite busy with a lot of travel, catching up on housework, and an exciting possibility. I hope you enjoy this bonus episode while I prep for next week's episode. It is from a previous Walk and it shows what happens when Identity becomes dependent on external evidence. In this bonus episode of Walk With Me, we revisit an earlier conversation about the manosphere, not to condemn the men drawn toward it or blindly defend the culture surrounding it, but to understand the need underneath its rise. Because before we debate masculinity, dominance, status, or dating, there is a more fundamental question: What is a man searching for when he no longer feels seen, valued, or certain of his place in the world? A lot of men feel invisible. And when someone finally says, “I see what you're going through. I understand why you're angry. I can show you how to become valuable,” that message can become extraordinarily powerful. The problem begins when self-improvement becomes ranking. When confidence depends on being above someone else. When money, women, appearance, status, achievement, or dominance become the evidence that you are finally enough. In this conversation, Dr. Giovanni DeJesus examines the difference between building yourself and constantly proving yourself, including his own experiences chasing status and external validation. Because external validation can work. For a moment. It can also become like drinking saltwater: the more you consume, the thirstier you become. This episode explores: Why the manosphere resonates with men who feel invisible or directionlessThe difference between self-improvement and ranking yourself against othersHow external validation can become tied to masculine identityWhy achievement and status cannot permanently stabilize self-worthThe difference between dominance and genuine strengthHow belonging, identity, and survival can shape the version of masculinity we performWhat healthier masculinity can look like without rejecting ambition, confidence, or strengthThe destination isn't weakness. And it isn't dominance. Real strength is stability. The episode closes with the Sail & Anchor exercise, an opportunity to examine which parts of your identity help you move through the world—and which parts you have mistaken for the source of your worth. You can have success without becoming your success. You can pursue strength without needing someone beneath you to prove you're strong. And you can build a life without requiring the world to continuously remind you that you deserve to exist inside it. Walk With Me — because you can't change your life until you understand the version of you creating it. Want to see the face behind the voice and additional content not shared on the podcast? click the links below, ike and subscribe and most importantly engage with me. I read every comment and reply.  https://www.youtube.com/@RisetoReclaim-gio https://www.facebook.com/giovanni.f.dejesus/ https://www.instagram.com/giovanni.f.dejesus/

  4. Oct 12

    How Groups Change Who You Are | The Stress Test of Belonging (2/2)

    Send us Fan Mail Who are you becoming because of the people and groups you belong to? In this episode of Walk With Me: The Architectural Stress Test, Identity and Internal Architecture Coach Dr. Giovanni DeJesus takes belonging through the eight pillars of the Walk With Me Method to examine how community, conformity, acceptance, disagreement, social pressure, and group identity can shape who we become. This is the companion episode to Can You Belong Without Losing Yourself? That walk asked whether individuality and collective identity can coexist. This one asks something more personal: What does belonging ask of you? Think about your family. Your workplace. Your friendships. Your religious community. Your political affiliations. Your team. Your relationship. Your online communities. Any place where there is an “us.” Belonging can bring courage, responsibility, solidarity, discipline, meaning, and growth. It can also bring pressure. Silence. Fear of rejection. Conformity. Contempt toward outsiders. And the gradual erosion of values you once believed were non-negotiable. The question isn't simply whether the group is “good” or “bad.” The deeper question is: What happens to your internal architecture when you become part of the group? Through Awareness, Gio asks what changes in your thoughts, language, and behavior when you're around certain people. Through Identity, he asks whether you're contributing yourself to the group or replacing yourself with the version of you that's easiest for the group to accept. Through The Mind, he examines the stories groups create about who “we” are, who “they” are, who can be trusted, and who should be feared. Through The Nervous System, he explores what happens when acceptance feels safe and disagreement threatens belonging. Through Emotions, he looks at the power of pride, loyalty, love, solidarity, shame, fear, anger, and contempt to mobilize collective behavior. Through Capacity, he asks one of the episode's central questions: Can your belonging survive disagreement? Can you say: “I love you, and I don't agree with you.” “I belong here, and I think we're wrong.” And can you offer somebody else the same freedom to disagree with you? Through Behavior, the question becomes brutally simple: What does belonging actually cause you to do? Because Behavior is where philosophy cashes the check. And through Meaning, Gio explores what can happen when individual purpose connects with collective purpose without being consumed by it. Using the image of a starling murmuration as metaphor, the episode explores a possibility: Coordination does not require sameness. Individuals can remain distinct while participating in something none of them could create alone. The episode concludes with The Belonging Audit, six questions you can use with almost any group in your life: Does belonging make my conscience louder or quieter? Does this group need my contribution or my conformity? Can I disagree and still belong? Does dissent automatically become betrayal? Does belonging expand my humanity toward people outside the group—or shrink it? And finally: Who do I become when I'm around these people? Maybe healthy belonging doesn't ask: “How much of yourself are you willing to surrender to us?” Maybe it asks: “What can you bring that only you can bring?” Your experience. Your gifts. Your questions. Your courage. Your conscience. Even your disagreement. The power of “we” is not inherently moral. Its direction depends on what the “we” rewards, what it condemns, what it asks you to become, and whether the “I” is still allowed to have a conscience. Take a walk with me. Want to see the face behind the voice and additional content not shared on the podcast? click the links below, ike and subscribe and most importantly engage with me. I read every comment and reply.  https://www.youtube.com/@RisetoReclaim-gio https://www.facebook.com/giovanni.f.dejesus/ https://www.instagram.com/giovanni.f.dejesus/

  5. Oct 5

    Can You Belong Without Losing Yourself? | Identity, Conformity & Community

    Send us Fan Mail Can you belong to something bigger than yourself without losing the individual identity, values, and conscience that made you who you are? In this episode of Walk With Me, Identity and Internal Architecture Coach  Dr. Giovanni DeJesus revisits an idea from one of his earliest walks: the tension between individual identity and group belonging. Seven months earlier, standing outside in twelve-degree weather, Gio explored what can happen when people surrender their conscience to a collective when conformity, propaganda, obedience, and group identity begin replacing independent judgment. That danger is very real. But it was only one side of the story. Human beings have also used the power of “we” to rescue neighbors, solve impossible problems, preserve cultures, create communities, and accomplish things no individual could accomplish alone. So the question changes: Can you belong without disappearing? To explore it, Gio looks at three very different moments of collective action. During the Danish rescue of 1943, thousands of Jewish people escaped Nazi persecution because ordinary citizens and organized networks chose to protect their neighbors. During Apollo 13, engineers, flight controllers, astronauts, and specialists with radically different expertise had to coordinate around one shared purpose: bringing three people home alive. And during the Baltic Way of 1989, people across Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania joined together in a massive peaceful demonstration defending cultural identity and self-determination. The lesson isn't that groups are inherently good. It isn't that groups are inherently dangerous. It's that collective power can move in radically different directions. A group can erase identity. And a group can protect it. Gio then brings the question closer to home through his experience in Chayon Ryu martial arts. The dojang had hierarchy. Discipline. Tradition. Shared values. But questioning an interpretation wasn't automatically treated as disrespect. People could study, challenge, disagree, and continue belonging. That experience raises an important distinction: Does the group need your contribution or your conformity? Healthy collective action doesn't necessarily require everybody to think the same. Sometimes it requires different people bringing different abilities, perspectives, questions, and experiences toward a shared purpose. Maybe belonging isn't supposed to make the individual disappear. Maybe healthy belonging gives individuality somewhere to contribute. But that answer creates a harder question. Because belonging changes us. Sometimes it makes us more courageous. More compassionate. More disciplined. More generous. Sometimes it makes us quieter. More afraid to question. More hostile toward outsiders. More willing to defend things we once would have challenged. So knowing that healthy belonging is possible isn't enough. We also have to ask: What is belonging actually doing to me? That question continues in the companion episode, The Stress Test of Belonging, where Gio runs belonging itself through the eight pillars of the Walk With Me Method. Take a walk with me. Because you can't change your life until you understand the version of you creating it. Want to see the face behind the voice and additional content not shared on the podcast? click the links below, ike and subscribe and most importantly engage with me. I read every comment and reply.  https://www.youtube.com/@RisetoReclaim-gio https://www.facebook.com/giovanni.f.dejesus/ https://www.instagram.com/giovanni.f.dejesus/

  6. Sep 28 ·  Bonus

    When Group Identity Replaces Your Conscience | The First Walk

    Send us Fan Mail What happens when belonging to a political, religious, ideological, or social group begins to replace your individual judgment, values, and sense of self? This is a special archival episode of Walk With Me: the first walk I intentionally wrote and recorded as the beginning of what would eventually become this podcast and the larger Internal Architecture framework. It was recorded seven months ago, outside in 12-degree weather with a real feel below zero. There was no polished production, no eight-pillar method yet, and no Season Two stress test. There was simply a question I couldn't stop thinking about: What happens when a person allows a system to define who they are? In this early walk, I explore identity, conformity, political and religious belonging, propaganda, obedience, individual conscience, and the psychological danger of reducing complex human beings to symbols of an opposing group. The journey moves through history and political philosophy, including the violent deaths of Johan and Cornelis de Witt during the Dutch Rampjaar of 1672, Baruch Spinoza's reaction to the killings, Hannah Arendt's controversial idea of the “banality of evil” after observing Adolf Eichmann's trial, Thomas Hobbes's Leviathan and its image of individual citizens forming the body of the sovereign, and Socrates's conflict with political authority and conscience. I also reflect on my own former experience working as a correctional officer and on contemporary events that originally pushed me into the cold to record this walk. This episode is not an argument that belonging to a group is inherently dangerous. Human beings build families, communities, teams, movements, institutions, religions, nations, and identities together. Group belonging can produce cooperation, courage, care, meaning, and extraordinary collective action. The question underneath this walk is more specific: What happens when belonging requires you to stop thinking for yourself? When disagreement becomes betrayal. When another person stops being a complex human being and becomes only “the enemy.” When loyalty to the group begins replacing individual conscience. And when your value comes entirely from your usefulness to something larger than yourself. Listening to this episode again seven months later, I can hear ideas that would eventually become central to Walk With Me: Identity as an internal blueprint. Awareness as the ability to observe the forces shaping you. Behavior as evidence of the system operating underneath you. Meaning as the question of what your life ultimately serves. And perhaps most importantly, the belief that understanding who you are matters because the alternative is allowing someone or something else to answer that question for you. This recording is being reposted in its original form. My language, research process, and framework have developed considerably since this first walk, and some legal and historical details available today require more nuance than I gave them in the original recording. I am leaving it intact because growth is easier to understand when we don't erase where we started. Seven months later, I'm still walking. The method is clearer. The research is stronger. The questions are harder. But underneath all of it remains the same idea: You cannot change your life until you understand the version of you creating it. Take a walk with me. Want to see the face behind the voice and additional content not shared on the podcast? click the links below, ike and subscribe and most importantly engage with me. I read every comment and reply.  https://www.youtube.com/@RisetoReclaim-gio https://www.facebook.com/giovanni.f.dejesus/ https://www.instagram.com/giovanni.f.dejesus/

  7. Sep 21 ·  Bonus

    BONUS: The Heart | Why Knowing What You Want Isn’t Enough

    Send us Fan Mail Why can you know exactly what you want, feel deeply called toward it, and still struggle to move in that direction? Sometimes the problem isn’t a lack of desire, clarity, or connection to what matters. The challenge is whether your internal system has the capacity to live what your heart already knows. This bonus episode of Walk With Me comes from an earlier conversation that became one of the foundational pieces of what would eventually develop into the Walk With Me Method. Before the eight pillars were fully organized into Awareness, Identity, Mind, Nervous System, Emotions, Capacity, Behavior, and Meaning, I was already wrestling with a central question: What happens when the deepest part of you wants one thing, but the systems built to protect you keep pulling you somewhere else? In this walk, I explore the heart not simply as emotion or romance, but as an orientation toward your deepest values, intentions, and sense of who you are beneath conditioning. We talk about why you can say: “I know what I want.” “My heart is telling me…” “I feel called toward this.” …and still find yourself frozen, delaying, rationalizing, or choosing safety instead. The heart may point toward a direction, but that direction still has to move through your identity, mind, body, nervous system, emotions, and capacity. When those systems interpret expression as dangerous, wanting something more intensely doesn’t automatically make movement easier. That distinction eventually became central to the Walk With Me Method: Awareness can reveal.  The heart can orient.  But your internal architecture helps determine what you can actually hold, express, and live. In this episode, we explore: In this episode, we explore:  Why knowing what you want doesn’t always create action  The difference between feeling called and having the capacity to respond  How protection can override expression  Why forcing positivity may not resolve internal resistance  The relationship between the heart, nervous system, mind, and identity  Why feeling stuck doesn’t necessarily mean you lack clarity  How capacity creates room to live more consistently with what matters to you And I’ll leave you with the same question this early Walk With Me conversation was built around: What does your heart already know that your system is still afraid to live? Don’t rush to answer it. Just notice. Because awareness is the beginning of every shift. Walk With Me. Want to see the face behind the voice and additional content not shared on the podcast? click the links below, ike and subscribe and most importantly engage with me. I read every comment and reply.  https://www.youtube.com/@RisetoReclaim-gio https://www.facebook.com/giovanni.f.dejesus/ https://www.instagram.com/giovanni.f.dejesus/

  8. Sep 15

    The Certainty Trap | Why You Can't Stop Overthinking the Future

    Send us Fan Mail Why can't you stop overthinking the future even after you've researched the decision, asked people you trust, weighed the risks, and thought through every possible outcome?  I am a day late but as I heard in one of my all time favorite quotes "The universe is always on time" In this episode of Walk With Me: The Architectural Stress Test, Dr. Giovanni Dejesus DC, MSPP explores The Certainty Trap: the point where responsible problem-solving can become certainty-seeking, and thinking stops producing useful information but continues because you still don't feel safe enough to move. Gio I am an Identity and Internal Architecture Coach, chiropractor, speaker, U.S. Marine Corps veteran, and creator of the Walk With Me Method, an eight-pillar framework for understanding the internal system shaping how we interpret and respond to life. You researched it. Replayed it. Made the list. Changed the list. Imagined what could go wrong. Imagined what could go right. Then imagined what could go wrong again. And somehow, you still don't feel ready. What if sometimes overthinking isn't simply an attempt to solve the problem? What if it's an attempt to eliminate uncertainty? Psychological research offers a useful concept for understanding part of this experience: intolerance of uncertainty. Research has found a strong relationship between difficulty tolerating uncertainty and worry, while also showing that people can respond to uncertainty in different ways, including repeatedly seeking predictability or becoming mentally and behaviorally stuck when certainty isn't available. But this isn't an episode about telling you to stop thinking. Planning is important. Due diligence takes effort. Some decisions genuinely require more information. The more useful question is: How do you know when thought is still serving the decision and when thought has become a strategy for avoiding the discomfort of making one? Through the eight pillars of the Walk With Me Method, Gio examines why uncertainty can become so difficult to hold. Awareness — The Observer Are you still discovering something new, or have you begun thinking in circles? There is a difference between “I need more information” and “I need the discomfort of not knowing to go away.” Identity — The Blueprint Sometimes the fear isn't only making the wrong decision. It's what being wrong might mean about you. If the relationship fails, can you still trust yourself? If the business doesn't work, were you foolish for trying? If you leave and regret it, does that make you irresponsible? When the outcome becomes evidence about your worth, intelligence, judgment, or identity, uncertainty becomes much harder to tolerate. The Mind — The Interpreter The Mind can generate Scenario A, Scenario B, Scenario C, and then ask what happens if B creates D. There will always be another variable available to think about because reality hasn't happened yet. Your Mind can simulate the future. It cannot certify it. The Nervous System — The Hallway Monitor Uncertainty is not universally experienced the same way. The unknown can feel threatening. It can also feel exciting. This episode explores how context, interpretation, previous experience, and physiological activation can influence what uncertainty comes to mean. Emotions — The Dashboard “I feel anxious” is not automatically the same statement as “this decision is wrong.” Fear, dread, anxiety, and excitement contain information. But information is not the same thing as a verdict. What are you making the feeling mean? Capacity — The Container The goal isn't to eliminate uncertainty. It's to increase your ability to remain responsible and present while some part of the outcome remains unknown. Can you hold an unanswered question without requiring yourself to resolve it tonight? Can you say: “I have enough information to move, and I still don't know exactly what happens next”? Behavior — The Evidence Certainty-seeking can look surprisingly productive: Another Google search. Another podcast. Another book. Another conversation. Another AI prompt. Another spreadsheet. Another pros-and-cons list. Another bank-account refresh. Another review of the text message. Another “What would you do?” The question isn't whether those behaviors are inherently bad. It's: What happens after the useful information runs out? Sometimes certainty-seeking can disguise itself as preparation. Meaning — The Compass The deeper cost isn't only worry. Sometimes it's a life placed on hold. I'll start when… I'll leave when… I'll apply when… I'll publish when… I'll commit when… I'll trust myself when… I know. Except some answers only arrive after you live the decision. Gio closes the episode with The Certainty Examination, a six-step process for one decision you've been circling: Separate what is known, knowable, and unknowable. Determine what additional information would actually change your decision. Set an information stop-rule. Identify what being wrong would mean about your identity. Read the emotional data without automatically treating discomfort as danger. Then choose the next responsible move rather than waiting for the perfect or guaranteed one. confidence is not about: “I know this will work.” I understand confidence as: “I don't know exactly what happens next, and I trust myself, my values, and my capacity to meet myself there.” The Certainty Trap isn't that you want answers. It's believing you need an answer life cannot give you before you give yourself permission to move. Take a walk with me. Follow Walk With Me for Season Two: The Architectural Stress Test, where Awareness, Identity, The Mind, The Nervous System, Emotions, Capacity, Behavior, and Meaning are tested against the real pressures of everyday life. Want to see the face behind the voice and additional content not shared on the podcast? click the links below, ike and subscribe and most importantly engage with me. I read every comment and reply.  https://www.youtube.com/@RisetoReclaim-gio https://www.facebook.com/giovanni.f.dejesus/ https://www.instagram.com/giovanni.f.dejesus/

See All (25)

Trailers

5
out of 5
4 Ratings

About

Walk With Me is a podcast for people who feel stuck, misaligned, or disconnected from their lives despite doing the “work.” It helps them understand the internal pillars, patterns, and beliefs shaping their reality so they can create real, lasting change. Unlike traditional self-improvement or manifestation content, Dr. Giovanni DeJesus DC, MSPP, focuses on systems over quick fixes, blending logical breakdowns with honest conversation to help people stop performing growth and start understanding the version of themselves creating their life. Walk With Me — because you can’t change your life until you understand the version of you creating it.

Information

  • Creator
    Giovanni Dejesus
  • Years Active
    2026
  • Episodes
    25
  • Rating
    Explicit
  • Copyright
    © 2026 Walk With Me
  • Show Website
    Walk With Me