The Oki Doke

Docket Media
  • 0.0 (0)
  • True Crime

The Oki Doke is a true crime podcast built entirely from the documented record. Court transcripts. Forensic reports. Sworn testimony. Official filings. Season 1 follows a case the world was told one version of, and tells you what the documents actually show. Twelve episodes. Every claim sourced. Every fact verified. Who played whom.

  1. Sep 23

    Episode 12: Who Played Whom?

    Season finale. The case did not end when the charges were dismissed. The unanswered questions became the case. Where is the original email? Season 1 was the record. Season 2 is the reckoning. SOURCE NOTE Every claim in this series is drawn from court filings, sworn testimony, forensic reports, and public-record litigation. You don't have to take our word for it — the record speaks for itself. Court Records on File: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals — No. 25-3335 Jackson v. Ebrahim, et al. (Originating: U.S. District Court, C.D. Cal. No. 2:23-cv-10700) Los Angeles Superior Court — Case No. 24STCV17056 Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLC (Breach of Contract, Fraud, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress) Los Angeles Superior Court — CPRA Case No. 25STCP03801 Jonathan T. Jackson v. County of Los Angeles Related Proceedings: Signature Resolution — Case No. MRQGQ Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLCSupport the show Support the show: https://www.buzzsprout.com/2623190/support

  2. Sep 16

    Episode 11: Still Fighting

    Four civil rights claims. Fabricating evidence. Malicious prosecution. Deceiving a judge. False arrest. Not one of them has ever been evaluated by any court on their merits. Not once. SOURCE NOTE Every claim in this series is drawn from court filings, sworn testimony, forensic reports, and public-record litigation. You don't have to take our word for it — the record speaks for itself. Court Records on File: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals — No. 25-3335 Jackson v. Ebrahim, et al. (Originating: U.S. District Court, C.D. Cal. No. 2:23-cv-10700) Los Angeles Superior Court — Case No. 24STCV17056 Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLC (Breach of Contract, Fraud, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress) Los Angeles Superior Court — CPRA Case No. 25STCP03801 Jonathan T. Jackson v. County of Los Angeles Related Proceedings: Signature Resolution — Case No. MRQGQ Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLCSupport the show Support the show: https://www.buzzsprout.com/2623190/support

  3. Sep 9

    Episode 10: The Deal

    Four months of negotiations. A signed settlement agreement. One hundred and forty-two required words. The six words that mattered most were never said. SOURCE NOTE Every claim in this series is drawn from court filings, sworn testimony, forensic reports, and public-record litigation. You don't have to take our word for it — the record speaks for itself. Court Records on File: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals — No. 25-3335 Jackson v. Ebrahim, et al. (Originating: U.S. District Court, C.D. Cal. No. 2:23-cv-10700) Los Angeles Superior Court — Case No. 24STCV17056 Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLC (Breach of Contract, Fraud, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress) Los Angeles Superior Court — CPRA Case No. 25STCP03801 Jonathan T. Jackson v. County of Los Angeles Related Proceedings: Signature Resolution — Case No. MRQGQ Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLCSupport the show Support the show: https://www.buzzsprout.com/2623190/support

  4. Sep 2

    Episode 9: What Came Back

    All charges dismissed. Same day, the DA sent JT Jackson's devices to Kevin Hart's legal team. When the computer came back it had been taken apart. The forensic examination became impossible. SOURCE NOTE Every claim in this series is drawn from court filings, sworn testimony, forensic reports, and public-record litigation. You don't have to take our word for it — the record speaks for itself. Court Records on File: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals — No. 25-3335 Jackson v. Ebrahim, et al. (Originating: U.S. District Court, C.D. Cal. No. 2:23-cv-10700) Los Angeles Superior Court — Case No. 24STCV17056 Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLC (Breach of Contract, Fraud, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress) Los Angeles Superior Court — CPRA Case No. 25STCP03801 Jonathan T. Jackson v. County of Los Angeles Related Proceedings: Signature Resolution — Case No. MRQGQ Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLCSupport the show Support the show: https://www.buzzsprout.com/2623190/support

  5. Aug 26

    Episode 8: There Wasn't Extortion in the Emails

    The lead DA investigator of the Cyber Crime Division was asked what in the emails led her to believe there was extortion. Her answer, under oath, in open court, there wasn't extortion in the emails. SOURCE NOTE Every claim in this series is drawn from court filings, sworn testimony, forensic reports, and public-record litigation. You don't have to take our word for it — the record speaks for itself. Court Records on File: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals — No. 25-3335 Jackson v. Ebrahim, et al. (Originating: U.S. District Court, C.D. Cal. No. 2:23-cv-10700) Los Angeles Superior Court — Case No. 24STCV17056 Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLC (Breach of Contract, Fraud, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress) Los Angeles Superior Court — CPRA Case No. 25STCP03801 Jonathan T. Jackson v. County of Los Angeles Related Proceedings: Signature Resolution — Case No. MRQGQ Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLCSupport the show Support the show: https://www.buzzsprout.com/2623190/support

  6. Aug 19

    Episode 7: Don't F**k This Up

    The Netflix documentary aired. Tens of millions of people watched. What they were not told, the extortion charges had already been dropped before the documentary premiered. SOURCE NOTE Every claim in this series is drawn from court filings, sworn testimony, forensic reports, and public-record litigation. You don't have to take our word for it — the record speaks for itself. Court Records on File: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals — No. 25-3335 Jackson v. Ebrahim, et al. (Originating: U.S. District Court, C.D. Cal. No. 2:23-cv-10700) Los Angeles Superior Court — Case No. 24STCV17056 Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLC (Breach of Contract, Fraud, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress) Los Angeles Superior Court — CPRA Case No. 25STCP03801 Jonathan T. Jackson v. County of Los Angeles Related Proceedings: Signature Resolution — Case No. MRQGQ Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLCSupport the show Support the show: https://www.buzzsprout.com/2623190/support

  7. Aug 12

    Episode 6: On the Stand

    The lead DA investigator testified under oath. Among her statements — this case was a business deal until the Instagram post. This episode examines every word she said that day. SOURCE NOTE Every claim in this series is drawn from court filings, sworn testimony, forensic reports, and public-record litigation. You don't have to take our word for it — the record speaks for itself. Court Records on File: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals — No. 25-3335 Jackson v. Ebrahim, et al. (Originating: U.S. District Court, C.D. Cal. No. 2:23-cv-10700) Los Angeles Superior Court — Case No. 24STCV17056 Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLC (Breach of Contract, Fraud, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress) Los Angeles Superior Court — CPRA Case No. 25STCP03801 Jonathan T. Jackson v. County of Los Angeles Related Proceedings: Signature Resolution — Case No. MRQGQ Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLCSupport the show Support the show: https://www.buzzsprout.com/2623190/support

  8. Aug 5

    Episode 5: Factual. Factual. Factual

    On May 22nd, 2019, on a recorded call, Kevin Hart authenticated a document. The forensic expert found that document was created in Microsoft Word five days before Hart called it factual. SOURCE NOTE Every claim in this series is drawn from court filings, sworn testimony, forensic reports, and public-record litigation. You don't have to take our word for it — the record speaks for itself. Court Records on File: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals — No. 25-3335 Jackson v. Ebrahim, et al. (Originating: U.S. District Court, C.D. Cal. No. 2:23-cv-10700) Los Angeles Superior Court — Case No. 24STCV17056 Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLC (Breach of Contract, Fraud, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress) Los Angeles Superior Court — CPRA Case No. 25STCP03801 Jonathan T. Jackson v. County of Los Angeles Related Proceedings: Signature Resolution — Case No. MRQGQ Jonathan T. Jackson v. Kevin D. Hart and HartBeat, LLCSupport the show Support the show: https://www.buzzsprout.com/2623190/support

See All (13)

About

The Oki Doke is a true crime podcast built entirely from the documented record. Court transcripts. Forensic reports. Sworn testimony. Official filings. Season 1 follows a case the world was told one version of, and tells you what the documents actually show. Twelve episodes. Every claim sourced. Every fact verified. Who played whom.

Information

  • Creator
    Docket Media
  • Years Active
    2026
  • Episodes
    13
  • Rating
    Explicit
  • Copyright
    © 2026 The Oki Doke
  • Show Website
    The Oki Doke