Witness of History

Maged Atia

History happened to real people. These are their stories. Witness of History is an immersive history podcast that tells the story of the ancient world through the eyes of those who lived it . Each episode is narrated by a witness: a stable boy, a sailor, a treasury clerk, ..etc. If you love short stories, historical fiction, and audio drams you will love Witness of History. Expect battles, political intrigue, exploration, ambition, triumph, and tragedy.. told not by historians looking back, but by the people caught in the middle of it all.

  1. 15h ago ·  Bonus

    Coin I. Philip II & Alexander the Great Coins

    How were the coins of Philip II and Alexander the Great actually made, trusted, and used? Through the eyes of a veteran craftsman at the royal mint of Amphipolis, step inside an ancient Macedonian workshop where silver is weighed, dies are engraved, blanks are struck, and old coins begin new lives. This immersive historical podcast explores Alexander’s tetradrachms, Philip’s continuing coinage, Athenian owls, Persian treasure, and the surprisingly human story behind the money that helped finance an empire. Narrator: Lysias, Craftsman of the Royal Mint at Amphipolis Setting: Amphipolis, Macedonia - 327 BCE 1. Sources a. Ancient Sources - Surviving coins of Philip II and Alexander III - Surviving Athenian owl tetradrachms - Diodorus Siculus, Library of History, Books XVI and XVII - Arrian, Anabasis of Alexander, Book III - Macedonian inscriptions from Amphipolis b. Modern Sources - Georges Le Rider, Alexander the Great: Coinage, Finances, and Policy - Martin Jessop Price, The Coinage in the Name of Alexander the Great and Philip Arrhidaeus - Georges Le Rider, Le monnayage d'argent et d'or de Philippe II frappé en Macédoine de 359 à 294 - Adrian Goldsworthy, Philip and Alexander: Kings and Conquerors - A. B. Bosworth, Conquest and Empire: The Reign of Alexander the Great 2. Author's Notes a. Historical - Amphipolis became an important center of Macedonian coin production. Philip II's control of Amphipolis and the mineral wealth around Mount Pangaion greatly strengthened the monarchy's access to gold and silver. - Philip's coinage continued after his death. Alexander's accession in 336 BCE did not cause Philip's familiar types to disappear. Old and new Macedonian coinages circulated together. - The chronology of Alexander's earliest royal coinage remains debated. Le Rider favors a major introduction of Alexander's new silver types around 333/332 BCE, rather than immediately upon his accession. - Alexander's famous silver tetradrachm showed Herakles in the lion skin and Zeus seated with eagle and sceptre, accompanied by Alexander's name. The Herakles image should not simply be treated as a portrait of Alexander. - Alexander's principal gold stater type showed Athena and Nike. His silver tetradrachms followed the Attic standard at roughly 17.2 grams in theoretical weight. - Ancient coins were produced using prepared metal blanks and engraved dies struck by hammer. Off-center strikes, weak impressions, worn dies and die cracks are natural products of this manufacturing process. - Alexander acquired enormous quantities of Achaemenid precious metal and bullion. Turning stored wealth into usable currency helped finance soldiers, garrisons, supplies and the administration of his expanding empire. - Alexander's money did not replace every other currency. Philip's coins, Athenian silver, local coinages and Alexander's issues could circulate alongside one another. - Ancient Athenian owl tetradrachms sometimes preserve test cuts made to examine whether the metal beneath the surface was genuine silver. b. Reconstructed - Lysias is fictional. No testimony survives from a named craftsman working at the Amphipolis mint during Alexander's reign. - Lysias's master, Myron, Nikanor, the other workers and all conversations and relationships inside the mint are fictional. - The exact layout of the workshop, including separate areas for weighing, engraving, furnaces, striking and dispatch, is reconstructed from the practical processes involved in ancient coin production. - The scarred Athenian owl that arrives at Lysias's workshop is fictional. Real Athenian tetradrachms circulated widely and genuine examples with ancient test cuts survive. - The imagined history of the owl is deliberately left unknown. Its test cut can show that someone once questioned its silver. - Lysias deciding to save the owl from the furnace, and remembering a similar coin shown to him by his master as a boy, are entirely fictional and provide the episode's emotional frame.

    Coin I. Philip II & Alexander the Great Coins
  2. 3d ago

    1.23. Hunting Satibarzanes twice - The Rebel of Areia

    The first time Satibarzanes betrayed Alexander, the king turned his army around and raced roughly seventy-five miles in two days to catch him. Satibarzanes escaped. The second time, Alexander did not bother coming himself. Through the eyes of Mikkos, a Macedonian cavalryman who takes part in both campaigns, follow one of the most frustrating rebellions of Alexander’s eastern conquest: Satibarzanes’ submission, his sudden revolt and killing of the Macedonian force left behind, Alexander’s extraordinary forced march back into Areia, and the rebel satrap’s escape only for him to return and rebel again. Narrator: Mikkos, Macedonian cavalryman Setting: Areia, 330–329 BCE 1. Sources a. Ancient Sources - Arrian, Anabasis of Alexander, Book III - Quintus Curtius Rufus, History of Alexander, Book VI - Diodorus Siculus, Library of History, Book XVII, Chapters 78 and 81 to 82 b. Modern Sources - Adrian Goldsworthy, Philip and Alexander: Kings and Conquerors - Peter Green, Alexander of Macedon, 356-323 B.C.: A Historical Biography - A. B. Bosworth, Conquest and Empire: The Reign of Alexander the Great - Philip Freeman, Alexander the Great 2. Author's Notes a. Historical - Satibarzanes was the Persian satrap of Areia and had been among the men involved in Darius III's final downfall. After Darius' death, he submitted to Alexander and was initially allowed to remain governor of his province. - Alexander left Anaxippus and about forty mounted javelin men with Satibarzanes. The episode simplifies them as cavalrymen. Satibarzanes later killed this force and raised Areia in revolt. - Alexander's response was extraordinarily fast. Arrian records that he turned back with a selected mobile force and covered nearly seventy-five miles in two days before reaching Artacoana. - Satibarzanes escaped before Alexander could catch him. Ancient accounts differ in some details of his flight and the forces accompanying him. - The destruction of rebels on a wooded mountain position by fire comes from Curtius. Arrian gives a different and less elaborate account of Alexander suppressing the first rebellion. - After the revolt, Alexander again entrusted Areia to a Persian satrap, demonstrating that one betrayal did not cause him to abandon his broader policy of governing much of the former Achaemenid Empire through local elites. - Satibarzanes later returned with approximately 2,000 cavalry from Bessus and raised Areia in rebellion for a second time. - Alexander did not return personally. He continued his eastern campaign and sent commanders including Artabazus, Erigyius and Caranus against Satibarzanes. - The death of Satibarzanes in single combat with Erigyius is ancient tradition. Arrian says Erigyius struck him in the face with his spear, while Diodorus presents the encounter more dramatically as a formal challenge between commanders. b. Reconstructed - Mikkos is fictional. His participation in both campaigns, his place within the cavalry and his personal memories of the events. - Mikkos knowing some of the men killed with Anaxippus is fictional.. - The detailed experience of the forced march, including exhausted horses, thirst, brief rests, sleeping in the saddle and Mikkos fearing his horse will collapse. - Mikkos' belief that Alexander drove men forward partly through shame at stopping while the king continued is an interpretation of Alexander's leadership style. - Mikkos witnessing the burning of the rebels from below. - The episode combines the surviving versions of the final combat cautiously. Erigyius killing Satibarzanes is historical tradition, but the precise movements, what each man saw and how nearby soldiers experienced the duel cannot be recovered. - Satibarzanes' severed head being treated by Mikkos as tangible proof of his death. - Mikkos' satisfaction that the pursuit is finally finished, followed by his unease that Alexander is already chasing another enemy farther east.

    1.23. Hunting Satibarzanes twice - The Rebel of Areia
  3. Oct 15 ·  Bonus

    Saga I. The Price of Duty - The Philotas affair & Murder of Parmenion

    What does duty cost when obedience becomes complicity? Through the eyes of Damon, a young royal courier in Alexander’s army, witness the Philotas affair and the secret mission that carries Alexander’s orders across hundreds of miles to Parmenion in Ecbatana. This immersive historical fiction podcast explores loyalty, secrecy, responsibility, and the machinery that allows kings to act across an empire. As Damon discovers that a courier can change history without ever drawing a sword, he is left with a question that follows him for the rest of his life: what is the difference between committing an act and carrying the order that makes it happen? Narrator: Damon, Former Royal Courie Setting: From Alexander's camp in Drangiana to Ecbatana, 330 BCE 1. Sources a. Ancient Sources - Arrian, Anabasis of Alexander, Book III, Chapters 26 to 27 - Quintus Curtius Rufus, History of Alexander, Book VI, Chapters 7 to 11 - Diodorus Siculus, Library of History, Book XVII, Chapters 79 to 80 - Plutarch, Life of Alexander, Chapters 48 to 49 - Justin, Epitome of Pompeius Trogus, Book XII b. Modern Sources - Peter Green, Alexander of Macedon, 356 to 323 B.C. - Adrian Goldsworthy, Philip and Alexander: Kings and Conquerors - A. B. Bosworth, Conquest and Empire: The Reign of Alexander the Great - F. W. Walbank, The Hellenistic World 2. Author's Notes a. Historical - In 330 BCE, while Alexander was in Drangiana, a conspiracy against his life was uncovered. Philotas, son of Parmenion and commander of the Companion cavalry, was accused primarily because he had learned of the plot but failed to report it promptly to Alexander. - Philotas' actual involvement in the assassination conspiracy remains uncertain. The surviving evidence clearly supports his failure to report what he had heard, but does not securely prove that he participated in Dimnus' plot. - Philotas was arrested, brought before the Macedonian army, interrogated and executed. Several ancient sources report that he was tortured before his death. - His father Parmenion was hundreds of miles away at Ecbatana. He was one of Macedonia's most experienced commanders, had served Philip II before Alexander, and controlled substantial forces and strategically important resources in Media. - Alexander decided that Parmenion could not safely be informed of his son's execution before action was taken against him. Whether Parmenion himself had participated in any conspiracy is not established by the surviving evidence. - Polydamas was historical. Alexander secretly sent him to Ecbatana carrying orders for Parmenion's death. The tradition preserved through Curtius describes him travelling in disguise with two Arab guides and reaching Ecbatana in only eleven days. - Polydamas first contacted Cleander, one of the Macedonian commanders at Ecbatana. Cleander and other officers then carried out Alexander's order. - The ancient tradition says Polydamas brought letters for Parmenion so that his arrival would appear normal. One was from Alexander and another reportedly carried Philotas' seal. Parmenion was reading the letters when the attack began. - Parmenion was killed before news of Philotas' execution could reach him. His death remains one of Alexander's most controversial acts because no secure evidence survives demonstrating Parmenion's personal involvement in the conspiracy. b. Reconstructed - Damon is fictional. His role as a young royal courier accompanying Polydamas. - Damon's apprenticeship under Polydamas. - The episode's horse relay system, exhausted mounts, relay stations and riding experiences. - Damon's presence when Philotas is brought from interrogation, and his observations of Philotas' injuries, are fictional. - The precise assassination scene is reconstructed. Ancient tradition places Parmenion's death during his meeting with Polydamas and Cleander. - Damon's belief that the letter itself was designed merely to hold Parmenion's attention is an interpretation of the ancient story.

    Saga I. The Price of Duty - The Philotas affair & Murder of Parmenion
  4. Oct 12 ·  Bonus

    Bonus K. Home - Homesickness of Alexander’s veterans

    How many victories can a man trade for years of his life? Through the eyes of Menon, a blacksmith in Alexander’s army, follow the Macedonians after Persepolis as wealth, exhaustion, and years away from home begin to change what victory means. With Darius dead and the war they thought they were fighting seemingly over, the soldiers finally prepare to return west, only to learn that Alexander intends to continue east in pursuit of Bessus. This immersive historical fiction podcast explores the growing homesickness of Alexander’s veterans, the dismissal of the Greek allied troops, the endless logic of continuing conquest, and the first unsettling realization that for Alexander, every victory did not bring the army closer to home. It simply revealed somewhere else to go. Narrator: Menon, Macedonian blacksmith attached to Alexander’s army Setting: Persepolis to Ecbatana, then east through Media during the final pursuit of Darius, 330 BCE 1. Sources a. Ancient Sources - Arrian, Anabasis of Alexander, Book 3, especially 3.19 to 3.25 - Diodorus Siculus, Library of History, 17.73 to 17.74 - Quintus Curtius Rufus, History of Alexander, Book 6, especially 6.2 to 6.4 - Justin, Epitome of Pompeius Trogus, 12.3 - Plutarch, Life of Alexander, 43 b. Modern Sources - Adrian Goldsworthy, Philip and Alexander - Peter Green, Alexander of Macedon, 356 to 323 B.C. - Philip Freeman, Alexander the Great - Pierre Briant, From Cyrus to Alexander: A History of the Persian Empire 2. Author's Notes a. Historical - The basic historical situation is firmly attested. After Persepolis, Alexander continued into Media in pursuit of Darius. Darius was eventually seized by Bessus and other Persian nobles and mortally wounded as Alexander's pursuing force approached. Alexander then continued campaigning against Bessus and the eastern resistance. - Homesickness is not invented for the episode. Diodorus specifically says that after Darius' death the Macedonians considered the campaign finished and were eager to return home. Alexander assembled the troops and persuaded them to continue. - The departure of the Greek allied contingents is historical, but the ancient sources differ slightly over its placement. Arrian places their dismissal at Ecbatana while Darius was still alive. Diodorus connects it with the period after Darius' death. This episode follows Arrian's chronology, with the allies departing before news of Darius' death reaches the narrator. - The army's wealth is historically grounded. By this point Alexander's forces had seized enormous quantities of treasure at Babylon, Susa and Persepolis. Modern reconstructions therefore support the episode's contrast between soldiers who had become materially wealthy and soldiers who increasingly wanted to enjoy that wealth at home. - Bessus represented a genuine continuation of resistance. He had been satrap of Bactria, participated in the seizure of Darius and later assumed the royal title. His control of forces and territory in the northeast gave Alexander a concrete military and political justification for continuing the campaign. b. Reconstructed - Menon the blacksmith is fictional. His workshop, wife, leaking roof, fig tree and personal memories are created for the episode. - The repeatedly repaired spear is fictional. It serves as the episode's symbol for soldiers who expected each campaign to be the last. - The conversations at the forge, letters from home, dead father, children growing up and soldiers discussing farms are reconstructed personal experiences. - Menon packing his tools after Darius' death and believing that the army is finally preparing for Macedonia. - Alexander's speech is summarized through Menon's memory rather than presented as a verbatim historical speech. Ancient authors preserve versions of Alexander persuading his reluctant soldiers to continue, but their exact wording is literary reconstruction. - The final exchange about whether the repaired spear will make it home.

    Bonus K. Home - Homesickness of Alexander’s veterans
  5. Oct 8

    1.22. Betrayal - The Last Persian King - Darius III Murdered

    What happens when a king loses everything except the men who still believe in him? Through the eyes of a Persian cavalry officer loyal to Darius III, follow the Great King east after Gaugamela as Alexander captures Babylon, Susa, Persepolis, and finally pursues him beyond Ecbatana. This immersive historical podcast explores Darius's final attempt to preserve his empire, the conspiracy of Bessus, his betrayal and death, and the extraordinary moment when Alexander found the body of the king he had spent years trying to defeat, and began to present himself not simply as Persia's conqueror, but as its legitimate heir. Narrator: Artabazos, Persian Noble Cavalry Officer Setting: Eastern Persia, 330 BCE Narrator: Artabazos, Persian Noble Cavalry Officer Setting: Eastern Persia, 330 BCE 1. Sources a. Ancient Sources - Arrian, Anabasis of Alexander - Plutarch, Life of Alexander - Curtius Rufus, History of Alexander - Diodorus Siculus, Library of History b. Modern Sources - Pierre Briant, From Cyrus to Alexander - Robin Lane Fox, Alexander the Great - Peter Green, Alexander of Macedon - Adrian Goldsworthy, Philip and Alexander 2. Author's Note a. Historical - After Gaugamela, Darius fled east attempting to raise another army. - His following steadily diminished as Alexander captured the empire's major capitals. - Bessus, satrap of Bactria, participated in the conspiracy that arrested Darius. - Darius was mortally wounded while being transported east. - Alexander arrived shortly after and treated Darius' body with royal respect. - Alexander later pursued Bessus and presented himself as avenger of the Great King. b. Reconstructed - Artabazos the narrator. - Campfire conversations. - Personal observations and emotions. - Dialogue and reflections. This episode closes the long rivalry between Alexander and Darius. Rather than ending with a battlefield, it ends with a road, a wagon, and two kings, one leaving history, the other inheriting it.

    1.22. Betrayal - The Last Persian King - Darius III Murdered
  6. Oct 5 ·  Bonus

    Ledger V. Alexander & Burning Persepolis

    What is lost when a civilization burns? Through the eyes of Menon, a Macedonian treasury clerk who has spent Alexander's campaign counting casualties, supplies, ships, tribute, and treasure, witness the capture and burning of Persepolis from the perspective of a man who discovers something numbers cannot measure. This immersive historical podcast explores the extraordinary wealth of the Persian capital, its monumental art and administrative records, and the human civilization hidden behind the Greek idea of “the enemy” asking whether the true cost of destruction can ever be entered into a ledger. Narrator: Menon, fictional Macedonian clerk attached to the royal treasury Setting: Persepolis, Persis, winter/spring 330 BCE 1. Sources a. Ancient Sources - Arrian, Anabasis of Alexander, Book 3.18 - Diodorus Siculus, Library of History, Book 17.70 to 72 - Plutarch, Life of Alexander, 38 - Quintus Curtius Rufus, History of Alexander, Book 5.6 to 7 - Strabo, Geography, Book 15 b. Modern Sources - Adrian Goldsworthy, Philip and Alexander: Kings and Conquerors - Philip Freeman, Alexander the Great - Peter Green, Alexander of Macedon, 356 to 323 B.C.: A Historical Biography - A. B. Bosworth, Conquest and Empire: The Reign of Alexander the Great - Pierre Briant, From Cyrus to Alexander: A History of the Persian Empire - Persepolis Fortification and Treasury Tablet scholarship: Archaeological work on the surviving administrative tablets was important for understanding the enormous bureaucratic system behind Persepolis. 2. Author’s Notes a. Historical - Persepolis was one of the great royal centers of the Achaemenid Empire. Its monumental architecture and reliefs deliberately presented the scale and diversity of Persian imperial rule. - Alexander captured an extraordinary royal treasury there. Ancient figures should be treated cautiously, but there is no doubt that the amount was enormous. Diodorus gives a figure of 120,000 talents and describes the treasure as accumulated from the revenues of Persian kings beginning with Cyrus. - Persepolis was violently plundered. Diodorus describes Macedonian troops looting houses, seizing gold, silver and luxury goods, enslaving women, and even fighting among themselves over the spoils. - Alexander later burned the royal palace complex. The surviving sources disagree about his motivation. The famous tradition associates the fire with a drinking party, Thais, and revenge for Xerxes’ destruction in Greece. Whether the burning was primarily spontaneous, symbolic, political, or some combination remains debated. - Persepolis really was an administrative world of records. Thousands of surviving Fortification and Treasury tablets reveal an extensive bureaucracy concerned with workers, rations, payments, travel, livestock, supplies, and administration. The episode uses this evidence to show Menon discovering Persia through the records of ordinary administration. b. Reconstructed - Menon is a fictional treasury clerk, and his presence at Persepolis is part of our continuing reconstruction of his life within Alexander’s administrative world. - Menon personally exploring and becoming attached to the archives is reconstructed. His changing perception of Persia is the emotional framework of the episode. - Menon running toward the records during the fire and rescuing a single ledger is fictional. It symbolizes the survival of ordinary human lives through administrative records. - The forty-three or forty-four days spent counting the treasure is fictional. The enormous scale of the captured wealth and the logistical challenge of moving it are historical, but we do not know how long individual clerks spent inventorying it. - The surviving Persepolis tablets should not be imagined as one archive simply consumed in Alexander’s fire. Ironically, the destruction helped preserve some clay tablets by baking them.

    Ledger V. Alexander & Burning Persepolis
  7. Oct 1

    1.21. The Persian gate - Ariobarzanes & The Persian Thermopylae

    What happened when Alexander the Great was finally forced to retreat? In the frozen mountains of Persia, a Macedonian shield-bearer witnesses Ariobarzanes turn the narrow Persian Gate into a deadly trap, stopping Alexander's advance toward Persepolis. This immersive historical podcast follows the failed frontal assault, the dangerous mountain route around the Persian defenses, and the striking reversal of Thermopylae, nearly 150 years after Persians outflanked Greeks at a mountain pass, Greeks and Macedonians now did the same to the Persians. Narrator: Theron, Macedonian shield-bearer in Alexander’s army Setting: The Persian Gate, Zagros Mountains, Persis, winter 331/330 BCE 1. Sources a. Ancient Sources - Arrian: Anabasis of Alexander, Book 3.18 - Quintus Curtius Rufus: History of Alexander, Book 5.3-4 - Diodorus Siculus: Library of History, Book 17 - Polyaenus: Stratagems, Book 4 - Herodotus: Histories, Book 7 b. Modern Sources - Adrian Goldsworthy - Philip and Alexander: Kings and Conquerors. - Philip Freeman - Alexander the Great. - Peter Green - Alexander of Macedon, 356–323 B.C.: A Historical Biography. 2. Author’s Notes a. Historical - The Battle of the Persian Gate took place during Alexander’s advance from Susa toward Persepolis in the winter of 331/330 BCE. Ariobarzanes, satrap of Persis, defended the narrow mountain approach into the Persian heartland. - Alexander divided his forces, sending Parmenion by the easier southern route while he took a smaller force through the mountains toward the Persian Gate. - Ariobarzanes had prepared a strong defensive position, including a wall across the pass. The Macedonians were struck from above with stones and missiles, and Alexander’s first frontal assault failed badly enough that he ordered a retreat. - Alexander subsequently learned of a route around the position and left Craterus behind with part of the army while taking selected troops through the mountains to outflank the Persians. Craterus was instructed to attack when Alexander gave the signal. - Alexander eventually reached the rear of the Persian position. The resulting attacks from different directions broke Ariobarzanes’ defense and opened the road to Persepolis. - Ancient estimates for the size of Ariobarzanes’ army are unreliable and probably exaggerated, which is why the episode avoids giving a precise number. - The comparison with Thermopylae is a historical parallel rather than evidence that Alexander deliberately intended to reenact the earlier battle: a Persian force now defended a narrow pass, while Alexander’s army ultimately succeeded by using a mountain route to reach its rear. b. Reconstructed - Theron is fictional, as are his personal experiences, thoughts, and conversations during the battle. - Details such as the soldiers’ experience of the retreat, the silence of the night march, Theron watching the Persian position, and his reflections on Thermopylae are dramatic reconstructions built around the known course of the campaign. - The precise sequence and details of the outflanking operation differ between the surviving ancient accounts. The episode presents a coherent reconstruction rather than treating every reported detail as certain. - The episode’s central idea, that Alexander experienced the unusual humiliation of being stopped and forced back before finding another way through, reflects the historical outcome of the failed frontal assault, while Theron’s emotional interpretation is fictional.

    1.21. The Persian gate - Ariobarzanes & The Persian Thermopylae
  8. Sep 28

    1.20. The Keys - Alexander in Susa

    What happens to an empire when its king is still alive, but his treasury has already changed hands? Through the eyes of a Persian treasury official, witness Alexander's arrival in Susa and the surrender of one of the Achaemenid Empire's great royal treasuries. This immersive historical podcast explores Persian wealth, royal administration, loyalty, and the unsettling realization that an empire may survive even as the king who once embodied it loses control.Narrator: Persian Treasury Official Setting: Susa, 331 BCE 1. Historical Sources a. Ancient Sources - Arrian, Anabasis of Alexander, Book III, Chapter 16. - Diodorus Siculus, Library of History, Book XVII, Chapters 65–66. - Quintus Curtius Rufus, Histories of Alexander the Great, Book V, Chapter 2. - Plutarch, Life of Alexander, Chapter 36. - Justin, Epitome of Pompeius Trogus, Book XI, Chapter 14. b. Modern Sources - Adrian Goldsworthy, Philip and Alexander: Kings and Conquerors. - A. B. Bosworth, Conquest and Empire: The Reign of Alexander the Great. - Peter Green, Alexander of Macedon, 356–323 B.C. 2. Author’s Notes a. Historical - Susa was one of the great royal and administrative centers of the Achaemenid Empire. It contained royal palaces and an enormous treasury accumulated by generations of Persian kings. Modern scholarship describes it as perhaps the most important Achaemenid capital from an administrative perspective. - Susa was surrendered without a major battle. The satrap of Susiana, Abulites, communicated his willingness to surrender to Alexander through Philoxenus and subsequently sent his son to meet Alexander. - The ancient sources disagree slightly over the precise amount of treasure captured. Arrian and Curtius give approximately 50,000 talents, while Diodorus describes more than 40,000 talents of uncoined gold and silver plus 9,000 talents of gold darics. - This treasure was not merely a collection of coins. Diodorus specifically describes huge quantities of uncoined precious metal. - Among the objects discovered were items the Persians had carried away from Greece during the Persian Wars, including the bronze statues of the Athenian tyrannicides Harmodius and Aristogeiton. Alexander ordered these returned to Athens. - Alexander did not dismantle the existing Persian administration completely. Abulites remained satrap of Susiana, while Alexander installed Macedonian personnel in strategically important positions. Arrian names Mazarus as commander of the citadel garrison and Archelaus as military commander. - Darius was still alive when Susa surrendered. He had escaped from Gaugamela and was attempting to gather another force farther east. - Alexander's acquisition of the treasuries at Babylon, Susa, Persepolis and Pasargadae fundamentally changed the financial position of his campaign. b. Reconstructed - The narrator is fictional. We do not possess the personal testimony of a Persian treasury official who surrendered Susa’s treasury to Alexander. - His thirty years of service, his father and grandfather having held the same responsibility, and the inheritance of the keys are fictional. - The physical keys themselves are a storytelling device. The ancient sources describe Alexander taking possession of Susa and its treasury, but they do not record a ceremonial transfer of treasury keys from an elderly Persian official. - The narrator’s detailed work with vaults, seals, inventories and records is reconstructed from the highly developed administrative culture of the Achaemenid Empire rather than from evidence for this particular individual. - The order to inspect every chamber before Alexander arrives is fictional. - The episode simplifies Alexander’s arrival by presenting the transition almost entirely through the treasury. Historically, the surrender was negotiated at a much higher political level by Abulites, the satrap of Susiana. - The narrator's sense of betrayal when he realizes that he feels relieved by an orderly surrender is reconstructed.

    1.20. The Keys - Alexander in Susa

About

History happened to real people. These are their stories. Witness of History is an immersive history podcast that tells the story of the ancient world through the eyes of those who lived it . Each episode is narrated by a witness: a stable boy, a sailor, a treasury clerk, ..etc. If you love short stories, historical fiction, and audio drams you will love Witness of History. Expect battles, political intrigue, exploration, ambition, triumph, and tragedy.. told not by historians looking back, but by the people caught in the middle of it all.