Final Notice

Jason Carr, Esq.

Final Notice s a weekly podcast where tax attorney Jason Carr breaks down real tax fraud prosecutions and reveals what should have been done to avoid them. New episodes every Friday at carrtaxlaw.com.

  1. 4d ago

    Location, Location, Liquidation

    Rishi Kapoor was CEO of Location Ventures, a Miami developer that raised about $89 million for projects that mostly were never built. Court records describe a yacht, a 2.8-carat diamond ring, and a $5.9 million Cocoplum home bought with misused investor funds. On the tax side, Location Ventures withheld about $1.3 million in payroll taxes and never paid them over, while Kapoor paid himself more than $2 million. His finance staff raised the issue in writing in 2019 and 2021. He admitted that false QuickBooks entries showed the taxes as paid and that investors received financial statements saying the same. He pleaded guilty to money laundering and a payroll tax conspiracy and received 136 months. Restitution remains open. I explain trust fund taxes, Slodov v. United States, the Trust Fund Recovery Penalty, and what a business owner should do the day payroll deposits fall behind. Key Takeaways Withheld payroll taxes are held in trust for the United States. They are not working capital.Falling behind on deposits is civil. False books and false statements about the taxes create criminal exposure.Internal emails, prior IRS notices, and distributions to owners are how willfulness gets proven.Make current deposits first, designate voluntary payments to the trust fund portion, and stop owner distributions.Bring in a tax attorney before internal discussions about what to pay and what to defer, so those communications can be privileged.Resources and Legal References DOJ sentencing announcement: https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdfl/pr/miami-real-estate-developer-sentenced-89-million-investor-fraud-and-tax-schemeIRS-CI sentencing announcement: https://www.irs.gov/compliance/criminal-investigation/miami-real-estate-developer-sentenced-for-89-million-investor-fraud-and-tax-schemeDOJ indictment announcement: https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdfl/pr/miami-developer-charged-85-million-fraud-scheme-used-fund-luxury-yacht-and-lifestyleUnited States v. Kapoor, No. 26-cr-20073 (S.D. Fla.)SEC v. Kapoor, No. 1:23-cv-24903 (S.D. Fla.): https://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releases/lr-25921Investigative reporting on the indictment: https://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/a-yacht-a-rolex-and-a-single-digit-inside-rishi-kapoors-alleged-fraud-40559116The Law Office of Jason Carr, PLLC: https://carrtaxlaw.comDisclaimer This video is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal or tax advice. Viewing this video does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and The Law Office of Jason Carr, PLLC. The discussion is based on publicly available information and is not a complete analysis of any person’s legal rights, defenses, tax obligations, or case facts. Any commentary about what a taxpayer, business owner, or advisor “should have done” is general educational discussion only and may not apply to your situation. If you have a specific legal or tax question, consult a qualified attorney or tax professional licensed in your jurisdiction. Comment Policy Please do not post confidential, sensitive, or personally identifiable tax information in the comments. We do not provide individualized legal or tax advice in the comments or social media replies.

    Location, Location, Liquidation

  2. Oct 16

    The $32 Million Address Change

    Company Number One wanted an overpayment applied to a later tax year. The filed IRS-CI affidavit says it returned a paper refund check with that request. Instead of applying the credit as requested, the IRS issued another check after processing false changes to the company’s business-account information. That check, for $32,495,888.58, reached Christopher Dowtin. A second company’s refund check for $26,156.50 also reached him. Dowtin brought both checks to a Morgan Stanley office in Ohio and attempted to place them into a trust-named brokerage account. He supplied documents purporting to support his authority over the money. Morgan Stanley contacted the Secret Service and IRS-CI, and agents seized the checks. Company representatives told investigators he was not authorized to act for them. After a bench trial, Dowtin was convicted of theft of government money and wire fraud. The court imposed 36 months in prison and 36 months of supervised release. The filed judgment lists no restitution; the government’s sentencing memorandum says intervention prevented actual financial loss. The district-court docket also records a notice of appeal. I explain what Form 8822-B does, why authority over a business’s IRS account matters, and what a business or tax professional should check when refund instructions and IRS correspondence stop matching. Key Takeaways Confirm the address and responsible party recorded for each business IRS account.Reconcile refund checks and carryforward requests against account records, especially when a check arrives despite instructions to apply an overpayment forward.Verify an unfamiliar Form 2848 or purported fiduciary appointment with the business before treating it as authorized.Preserve notices, forms, account history, and communications if a change appears unauthorized.Treat missing expected IRS correspondence as a possible business identity-theft warning sign.Use the IRS’s business identity-theft reporting guidance when its stated criteria fit the facts.Resources and Legal References Filed IRS-CI complaint and agent affidavit: The investigated sequence, documents, company interviews, and checks. Allegations in the affidavit should be distinguished from the later verdict.Indictment: The charged theft and wire-fraud theory, including Forms 56, 2848, and 8822-B.United States v. Dowtin, No. 3:25-cr-00032, verdict: The bench-trial findings of guilt on the six counts that proceeded to trial.United States v. Dowtin, pretrial order, Feb. 6, 2026: The court’s treatment of proposed sovereign-citizen and mistake-of-law arguments, while preserving an opportunity to contest intent on a genuine factual basis.Government sentencing memorandum and judgment: The government’s account of prevented loss and the court’s actual sentence and monetary orders.IRS-CI sentencing account: Agency account of the disposition.Form 8822-B and instructions: Business address and responsible-party changes, signatory requirements, and representative authority.18 U.S.C. § 641: Theft or conversion of United States money or property.18 U.S.C. § 1343: Wire fraud.26 U.S.C. § 6109: Taxpayer identifying numbers. Dowtin’s convictions were under Title 18, not this IRC section.IRS business identity-theft guidance and business reporting guidance: Warning signs and reporting options.Related Steven Ware case: A separate corporate-refund impersonation comparison.The Law Office of Jason Carr, PLLC.Disclaimer This video is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal or tax advice. Viewing this video does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and The Law Office of Jason Carr, PLLC. The discussion is based on publicly available information and is not a complete analysis of any person’s legal rights, defenses, tax obligations, or case facts. Any commentary about what a taxpayer, business owner, or advisor “should have done” is general educational discussion only and may not apply to your situation. If you have a specific legal or tax question, consult a qualified attorney or tax professional licensed in your jurisdiction. Comment Policy Please do not post confidential, sensitive, or personally identifiable tax information in the comments. We do not provide individualized legal or tax advice in the comments or social media replies.

    The $32 Million Address Change

  3. Oct 9

    The Godfather’s Other Ledger

    Iris Rabaya Au formed shell companies and opened bank accounts at the direction of her then-boyfriend, Adam Iza, who called himself “The Godfather.” According to the government’s account of her plea, funds moving through those accounts paid approximately $1 million to sheriff’s deputies, supported nearly $10 million in recreational spending, and purchased approximately $16 million in cryptocurrency for Iza. Au admitted transferring more than $2.6 million from the company accounts into her personal accounts between 2020 and 2023 and willfully failing to report that income. Prosecutors also argued that she concealed entities and income from her tax preparer. She pleaded guilty to subscribing to a false return. On September 21, 2026, she was sentenced to 18 months in prison, ordered to pay $1,484,343 in restitution, and ordered to forfeit luxury assets. I follow the accounts behind the spending, distinguish money moved for someone else from money received personally, and explain why a preparer needs the complete financial picture before a taxpayer signs a return. Key Takeaways Reconcile transfers into personal accounts separately from payments made for an entity or another person.Give the return preparer a complete list of relevant entities and accounts.Support labels such as “loan” or “reimbursement” with records showing what happened.Compare the completed return against the underlying account reconciliation before signing.Coordinate tax corrections with the broader defense when funds may have an illegal source.The IRS Criminal Investigation Voluntary Disclosure Practice excludes taxpayers with illegal-source income.Resources and Legal References Central District of California sentencing account: Au’s sentence, admitted transfers, forfeiture, and prosecutors’ preparer-concealment argument.Central District of California plea announcement: The government’s account of what Au agreed to admit.IRS-CI case account: Agency account of Au’s disposition and the financial structure.Related Saavedra sentencing account: A separate recipient’s false-return case within Iza’s operation.26 U.S.C. § 61: Gross income from whatever source derived.26 U.S.C. § 7206(1): Willfully subscribing to a materially false return under penalties of perjury. The official case accounts describe Au’s offense as false subscription; the filed charging document was unavailable for this draft.Rutkin v. United States, 343 U.S. 130 (1952): The Supreme Court held that extorted funds can be taxable income when the recipient controls and derives economic value from them. This is a comparison of tax principles, not a ruling about Au.IRS Criminal Investigation Voluntary Disclosure Practice: Current eligibility guidance, including its illegal-source-income exclusion.The Law Office of Jason Carr, PLLC.Disclaimer This video is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal or tax advice. Viewing this video does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and The Law Office of Jason Carr, PLLC. The discussion is based on publicly available information and is not a complete analysis of any person’s legal rights, defenses, tax obligations, or case facts. Any commentary about what a taxpayer, business owner, or advisor “should have done” is general educational discussion only and may not apply to your situation. If you have a specific legal or tax question, consult a qualified attorney or tax professional licensed in your jurisdiction. Comment Policy Please do not post confidential, sensitive, or personally identifiable tax information in the comments. We do not provide individualized legal or tax advice in the comments or social media replies.

    The Godfather’s Other Ledger

  4. Oct 2

    Double-Booked

    Laura Marie Means kept the books for a Jackson Hole family business with several lodging and hospitality properties. She managed payroll, bank accounts, and tax reporting, and continued working remotely after moving to Hawaii in 2019. According to the government’s account, Means routed unauthorized transfers to her own accounts while recording them in QuickBooks as “supplies” and “invoices.” She also used a bank account the business had not approved and paid herself duplicate salaries and unearned bonuses. The conduct ran from February 2019 through September 2025. Means pleaded guilty to wire fraud and filing a false tax return. On September 22, 2026, she was sentenced to 46 months in prison and three years of supervised release, with restitution of $1,484,104.80 to her former employer and $355,875.32 to the IRS. In this episode, I follow the accounting labels, the payments, and the tax reporting. I also explain why stolen receipts can be taxable income and what business owners and tax professionals should check when one person controls both a payment and its description. Key Takeaways Match accounting entries to the receiving bank account, invoice, and approval.Review payroll for duplicate salaries and bonuses outside approved compensation.Give an owner or independent reviewer visibility into every business account.Preserve records before correcting entries when possible theft is suspected.Review the victim business’s tax filings separately from the employee’s personal tax case.Get privileged advice before making new statements or filings when the facts may involve theft or false returns.Resources and Legal References District of Wyoming case account and sentencing: Means’s plea, sentence, restitution, and publicly described transaction methods.26 U.S.C. § 61: Gross income.26 C.F.R. § 1.61-14(a): Illegal gains constitute gross income.26 U.S.C. § 7206(1): Willfully making a materially false return under penalties of perjury. United States v. Pangburn, No. CR 19-4367 JB (D.N.M. June 1, 2020): Separate case used for its account of unauthorized QuickBooks payments and the transaction history that exposed them. The opinion resolved sentencing-enhancement issues, not Means’s charges.IRS Criminal Investigation Voluntary Disclosure Practice: The practice excludes illegal-source income and does not guarantee immunity.The Law Office of Jason Carr, PLLC.Disclaimer This video is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal or tax advice. Viewing this video does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and The Law Office of Jason Carr, PLLC. The discussion is based on publicly available information and is not a complete analysis of any person’s legal rights, defenses, tax obligations, or case facts. Any commentary about what a taxpayer, business owner, or advisor “should have done” is general educational discussion only and may not apply to your situation. If you have a specific legal or tax question, consult a qualified attorney or tax professional licensed in your jurisdiction. Comment Policy Please do not post confidential, sensitive, or personally identifiable tax information in the comments. We do not provide individualized legal or tax advice in the comments or social media replies.

    Double-Booked

  5. Sep 25

    The Superbowl Bribe

    James Soriano worked as a civilian engineer and Contracting Officer’s Representative at the Naval Information Warfare Center in San Diego. His position allowed him to influence evaluations, contract awards, project approvals, and payments. Court records indicate Soriano accepted benefits from defense contractors between 2014 and 2019. Those benefits included expensive dinners, golf outings, jobs for family and friends, World Series seats, and a $10,900 Super Bowl ticket. In exchange, Soriano permitted contractors to draft government procurement documents, gave favored bidders excellent ratings, advocated for their selection, and helped them obtain contracts and task orders worth hundreds of millions of dollars. In one instance, a contractor received a task order with a potential value exceeding $343 million. A family friend employed by one contractor gave Soriano $2,000 per month from her salary. Soriano omitted $18,000 in 2017, $24,000 in 2018, and $14,000 in 2019 from his federal tax returns. On September 9, 2026, Soriano was sentenced to 72 months in federal prison. He was ordered to forfeit $209,527.51 and pay $18,722.40 in restitution to the IRS. Jason explains why illegal gains remain taxable, how Section 7206(1) applies to materially false returns, and why metadata, contractor expense reports, payroll records, procurement files, and Forms 1040 created a complete investigative trail. Key Takeaways Illegal gains, including bribes and kickbacks, generally constitute gross income.A false-return prosecution can be based on a specific material omission from a signed Form 1040.Noncash benefits, family employment, and recurring cash transfers create overlapping evidentiary trails.Document metadata can identify who actually wrote a supposedly independent government record.The IRS Voluntary Disclosure Practice excludes taxpayers with illegal-source income.Tax and white-collar issues should be investigated together under privilege when income may arise from criminal conduct.Resources Mentioned 26 U.S.C. § 61: Gross income includes income from whatever source derived.26 C.F.R. § 1.61-14: Illegal gains constitute gross income.26 U.S.C. § 7206(1): Willfully signing a materially false return under penalties of perjury.18 U.S.C. § 371: Conspiracy to commit an offense against or defraud the United States.18 U.S.C. § 201: Bribery of public officials.James v. United States, 366 U.S. 213 (1961): Unlawful gains are taxable income; the opinion identifies bribes and graft as taxable receipts.The Law Office of Jason Carr, PLLC: https://carrtaxlaw.comDisclaimer This video is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal or tax advice. Viewing this video does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and The Law Office of Jason Carr, PLLC. The discussion is based on publicly available information and is not a complete analysis of any person’s legal rights, defenses, tax obligations, or case facts. Any commentary about what a taxpayer, business owner, or advisor “should have done” is general educational discussion only and may not apply to your situation. If you have a specific legal or tax question, consult a qualified attorney or tax professional licensed in your jurisdiction. Comment Policy Please do not post confidential, sensitive, or personally identifiable tax information in the comments. We do not provide individualized legal or tax advice in the comments or social media replies.

    The Superbowl Bribe

  6. Sep 18

    The Tax Shelter That Wouldn’t Die

    Michael J. Moore operated X Tax Pros, a Las Vegas tax and accounting firm specializing in adult-entertainment clients. From 2015 through 2025, he promised clients that his “Special Tax Shelter Strategy” could eliminate their taxes and create large refunds. Court records indicate Moore fabricated business losses, cost-of-goods-sold entries, and royalty expenses. Many claimed losses came from entities that conducted no business and had no relationship with the clients. Moore collected fees reaching tens of thousands of dollars from the resulting refunds. His conduct caused more than $3.5 million in tax loss. After pleading guilty in September 2025, Moore launched another scheme while awaiting sentencing. He used losses from dormant or defunct entities and concealed his involvement using a former employee’s identity. Moore pleaded guilty to tax evasion, assisting a false return, wire fraud, and aggravated identity theft. He received 60 months in federal prison on September 2, 2026. Jason explains Section 7206(2), why phantom entity losses are easy to test, and how identity theft transformed concealment into a separate federal offense. Key Takeaways A business loss requires real economic activity and a valid relationship between the taxpayer and the entity.Section 7206(2) applies even when the taxpayer knows about or approves the false return.Refund-funded fees create a dangerous incentive for preparers to inflate deductions.A prior guilty plea provides strong evidence of knowledge when the conduct continues.Taxpayers should compare filed returns against their actual entities, ownership interests, and business records.Privilege matters before correcting returns when the taxpayer may have knowingly participated.Resources Mentioned 26 U.S.C. § 162: Trade or business expenses.26 U.S.C. § 7201: Attempt to evade or defeat tax.26 U.S.C. § 7206(2): Assisting or advising the preparation of a materially false tax document.18 U.S.C. § 1028A: Aggravated identity theft and its additional two-year sentence.Ninth Circuit Model Criminal Jury Instruction 22.4: Elements of a Section 7206(2) offense.United States v. Smith, 424 F.3d 992, 1009 (9th Cir. 2005): Section 7206(2) requires assistance, material falsity, and willfulness.United States v. Marc Howard Berger: CPA convicted after helping a client omit more than $18 million in income.Berger sentencing: Eight months’ imprisonment, supervised release, and a $20,000 fine.The Law Office of Jason Carr, PLLC: https://carrtaxlaw.comDisclaimer This video is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal or tax advice. Viewing this video does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and The Law Office of Jason Carr, PLLC. The discussion is based on publicly available information and is not a complete analysis of any person’s legal rights, defenses, tax obligations, or case facts. Any commentary about what a taxpayer, business owner, or advisor “should have done” is general educational discussion only and may not apply to your situation. If you have a specific legal or tax question, consult a qualified attorney or tax professional licensed in your jurisdiction. Comment Policy Please do not post confidential, sensitive, or personally identifiable tax information in the comments. We do not provide individualized legal or tax advice in the comments or social media replies.

    The Tax Shelter That Wouldn’t Die

  7. Sep 11

    The Check Churning Gambler

    Eric Brian Rosenberg, publicly known as “E. Brian Rose,” operated GC Wire, a digital news publication on the Mississippi Gulf Coast, and ran for Congress in 2018. He owed federal income taxes for calendar years 2004 through 2016. When the IRS assigned a revenue officer to collect in April 2016, Rosenberg did not negotiate. Instead, he began draining his bank account by repeatedly purchasing cashier’s checks, holding them, and redepositing them only when he needed cash, a cycle designed to keep his balance near zero so IRS levies would come back empty. In 2021, he escalated by forming a corporation, opening a nominee bank account, and continuing the same check churning through the corporate entity without disclosing it to the IRS. During this entire period, Rosenberg spent more than $1 million gambling at casinos. On August 19, 2026, Rosenberg pleaded guilty to one count of tax evasion under 26 U.S.C. § 7201. Prosecutors recommended a sentence of two years in prison, three years of probation, and $2,317,528.91 in restitution. Sentencing is scheduled for December 16, 2026. Jason explains the critical distinction between evasion of assessment and evasion of payment, how “check churning” works to defeat IRS bank levies, why casino spending is both lifestyle evidence and a disqualifier for civil resolution, and what Rosenberg should have done the moment the revenue officer showed up: engage, disclose, and negotiate. Key Takeaways Tax evasion under Section 7201 covers two types of conduct: evasion of assessment (hiding income) and evasion of payment (hiding assets from collection). Both carry up to five years in prison per count.“Check churning” is a specific technique to defeat IRS bank levies by keeping account balances near zero through repeated cashier’s check purchases.Simply not paying taxes is not criminal. The government must prove the taxpayer took affirmative steps to prevent collection.Opening nominee accounts and failing to disclose them to the IRS are classic affirmative acts of evasion.Spending over $1 million at casinos while owing $2 million to the IRS destroys any viable civil resolution and provides powerful evidence of willfulness.When the IRS assigns a revenue officer, the time to act is immediately: file missing returns, prepare accurate financial disclosures, and negotiate a resolution through counsel.Attorney-client privilege is critical in collection cases. Statements made to the IRS or to non-attorney advisors are not protected.Resources Mentioned DOJ guilty plea announcement (Aug. 20, 2026): https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/mississippi-man-pleads-guilty-evading-2m-taxes 26 U.S.C. § 7201 (Attempt to evade or defeat tax) IRS Form 433-A (Collection Information Statement for Wage Earners and Self-Employed Individuals): https://www.irs.gov/forms-pubs/about-form-433-a IRS Form 433-B (Collection Information Statement for Businesses): https://www.irs.gov/forms-pubs/about-form-433-b IRS Form 656 (Offer in Compromise): https://www.irs.gov/forms-pubs/about-form-656 The Law Office of Jason Carr, PLLC: https://carrtaxlaw.com Disclaimer This video is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal or tax advice. Viewing this video does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and The Law Office of Jason Carr, PLLC. The discussion is based on publicly available information and is not a complete analysis of any person’s legal rights, defenses, tax obligations, or case facts. Any commentary about what a taxpayer, business owner, or advisor “should have done” is general educational discussion only and may not apply to your situation. If you have a specific legal or tax question, consult a qualified attorney or tax professional licensed in your jurisdiction. Comment Policy Please do not post confidential, sensitive, or personally identifiable tax information in the comments. We do not provide individualized legal or tax advice in the comments or social media replies.

    The Check Churning Gambler

  8. Aug 28

    The Phantom Schedule C

    Ann Quach ran a tax preparation business in Thousand Oaks, California, under the names AQ Financial and A2Z Tax Solutions. From 2011 to 2024, she prepared 1,734 false Form 1040 returns for her clients. Her method was distinctive: she fabricated entire businesses her clients never owned, placed them on Schedule C, and loaded them with fictitious losses to offset the clients’ real W-2 income. She then layered false medical and charitable deductions on top. The result was inflated refunds that kept clients coming back, year after year, while causing multi-million-dollar losses to the U.S. Treasury. On August 6, 2026, U.S. District Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett sentenced Quach to 27 months in federal prison and ordered her to pay $6,481,731 in restitution. Prosecutors noted this was not “a brief lapse in judgment” but a years-long scheme in which Quach exploited her tax expertise. Jason explains how Section 7206(2) works (the federal statute targeting preparers who aid in filing false returns), why the IRS watches Schedule C more closely than any other individual form, how pattern analysis catches high-volume preparer fraud, and what the 1,734 affected clients should do now: amended returns, preparer misconduct affidavits, and why the signature on every Form 1040 is the taxpayer’s responsibility. Key Takeaways Fabricating businesses on client returns is a federal felony under 26 U.S.C. § 7206(2), punishable by up to three years in prison per count.Section 7206(2) does not require proof that the client knew the return was false. The preparer’s conduct is independently criminal.Schedule C is the most commonly audited form on individual returns because it relies on self-reporting with no third-party verification.When a preparer is convicted, the IRS typically reviews the full client list. Affected clients owe back taxes, penalties, and interest on the fabricated deductions.Clients who did not know about the fabrication can argue reasonable cause to abate fraud penalties, but they still owe the underlying tax.Filing Form 14157 and Form 14157-A (Preparer Fraud or Misconduct Affidavit) tells the IRS you are cooperating and were a victim of preparer misconduct.Never sign a return you have not reviewed. Your signature under penalties of perjury is your responsibility, not your preparer’s.Resources Mentioned DOJ sentencing announcement (Aug. 6, 2026): https://www.justice.gov/usao-cdca/pr/ventura-county-tax-preparer-sentenced-more-2-years-federal-prison-filing-more-1700 26 U.S.C. § 7206 (Fraud and false statements, including subsection (2) on aiding and assisting) 26 U.S.C. § 7201 (Attempt to evade or defeat tax) IRS Form 14157 (Complaint: Tax Return Preparer): https://www.irs.gov/forms-pubs/about-form-14157 IRS Form 14157-A (Tax Return Preparer Fraud or Misconduct Affidavit): https://www.irs.gov/forms-pubs/about-form-14157-a IRS Form 1040-X (Amended U.S. Individual Income Tax Return): https://www.irs.gov/forms-pubs/about-form-1040x The Law Office of Jason Carr, PLLC: https://carrtaxlaw.com Disclaimer This video is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal or tax advice. Viewing this video does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and The Law Office of Jason Carr, PLLC. The discussion is based on publicly available information and is not a complete analysis of any person’s legal rights, defenses, tax obligations, or case facts. Any commentary about what a taxpayer, business owner, or advisor “should have done” is general educational discussion only and may not apply to your situation. If you have a specific legal or tax question, consult a qualified attorney or tax professional licensed in your jurisdiction. Comment Policy Please do not post confidential, sensitive, or personally identifiable tax information in the comments. We do not provide individualized legal or tax advice in the comments or social media replies.

    The Phantom Schedule C
See All (27)

About

Final Notice s a weekly podcast where tax attorney Jason Carr breaks down real tax fraud prosecutions and reveals what should have been done to avoid them. New episodes every Friday at carrtaxlaw.com.

Information

  • Creator
    Jason Carr, Esq.
  • Years Active
    2026
  • Episodes
    27
  • Rating
    Clean
  • Copyright
    © 2026 The Law Office of Jason Carr, PLLC
  • Show Website
    Final Notice