Binance lost $6.3 billion from one hot wallet, and it took one signature. Chris walks through EIP-7702, the Ethereum upgrade that lets an address hand all of its powers to a contract (he dissented at DevCon 2024), the "drain" function, and the nonce trick: 50 signed transactions fired blind, one lands. Circle and Tether froze $2.4 billion within half an hour, ETH traded at $3,000 on-chain against $2,200 on exchanges, someone paid $120,000 in gas and still made $250,000, and Tyler asks whether arbing a hacker's dump is money laundering (the pillowcase protocol). Who can even spend it? North Korea wants Steam games. Then: Cohere says Qwen 3.8 phoned home to Beijing, and Tyler explains the Manchurian-candidate fear versus what actually happened. Then an anonymous AI audit of 138 Saez–Zucman papers: 2,035 problems, 147 major, and who audits the auditor. The marquee for the brain: Anthropic disproved the Exponential Time Hypothesis. Chris explains 3-SAT, why every hard problem reduces to it, what "sub-exponential, barely" means, and whether anyone should panic about P = NP. The AI proofs are hideously ugly, so Chris proposes the ugly simulation hypothesis. Perp of Fortune: short BNB 10× (we called the hack and still lost money) and the hourly Bitcoin flip. Jackson hosts from a bathroom. There is a bidet. The hack is at 4:36. Chapters: Cold open (0:00) · The Permanent Underpod is dead (0:50) · Perp of Fortune: short BNB 10× and the hourly Bitcoin flip (2:15) · Binance hacked for billions (4:36) · EIP-7702: one signature, total control (6:07) · The nonce trick (9:15) · Circle and Tether freeze $2.4 billion (10:10) · The best arb in history (13:17) · Is arbing a hacker's dump money laundering? (14:11) · Jackson would settle for $3 billion (17:06) · Who can even spend it? (18:39) · Cohere says Qwen 3.8 phoned Beijing (20:39) · Sleeper agents (25:20) · Intermission: live from the bathroom (27:48) · An AI audited 138 Saez–Zucman papers (28:38) · The numbers, and who audits the auditor? (33:45) · Physics PhDs vs the model (36:26) · Run your thesis through a frontier model (39:23) · Anthropic disproved the Exponential Time Hypothesis (41:40) · What is 3-SAT? (43:36) · Sub-exponential, barely (44:48) · Does this mean P = NP? (47:36) · The ugly simulation hypothesis (49:05) · The corollary for cryptography (51:54) · If P = NP: calendars, peptides, no free will (52:49) · Perp final (55:11) Recorded fully remote, three cameras, one bathroom. The hack was reported at $5 billion when we recorded; it has since been put at $6.3 billion. Our opinions are our own, not our employers'. NOT financial advice; Perp of Fortune is a small real-money account we run for entertainment. Glossary: EIP-7702 = an Ethereum upgrade that lets a normal address delegate all of its powers to a contract with one signed transaction. EOA = a normal key-controlled wallet. Hot wallet = an exchange wallet kept online for withdrawals. Nonce = the per-account transaction counter, used once and in order. Stablecoin freeze = Circle and Tether blacklisting an address so its tokens stop moving. Wrapped Bitcoin = a custodian's Bitcoin IOU on Ethereum, freezable. AMM = an on-chain exchange where you trade against a pool and never pick your counterparty. Lazarus = North Korea's state hacking group. Sleeper agent = a model trained to behave until a trigger phrase. Replication crisis = the finding that much published research can't be reproduced. 3-SAT = clauses of three true/false variables that all have to be satisfied at once; every hard problem rewrites into one. Exponential Time Hypothesis = the 1999 conjecture that 3-SAT needs exponential time; the new result is sub-exponential, barely. P vs NP = whether everything checkable fast is also solvable fast; public-key cryptography assumes not. Subscribe for next week: contrarian corner, fire everyone but the engineers; Anthropic's one-person biotech; Liquid, graded after the hack; Perp of Fortune rides again.