In this episode of the Data Center Resistance Podcast, we head to Americus, Georgia, where residents are confronting plans for a massive new data-center campus in a community already dealing with questions about water, infrastructure, land use, and the future of Southwest Georgia. Kirk Lyman-Barner and Katie Minich bring two different but complementary perspectives to the conversation. Lyman-Barner is a longtime Americus resident, business owner, affordable-housing advocate, and community leader with deep roots in the work of Habitat for Humanity, the Fuller Center for Housing, and the legacy of Clarence Jordan and Koinonia Farm. He has spent decades working at the intersection of community development, economic opportunity, and social responsibility. Katie Minich is a Southwest Georgia native and longtime community leader in Americus. She has worked for the Georgia Student Finance Commission helping students and families navigate higher education and financial aid, and has served in local civic and educational leadership, including as vice chair of the Furlow Charter School governing board. Minich has also been deeply engaged in the civic life of Americus, bringing a perspective rooted in education, families, and the long-term future of the community. Together, Kirk and Katie offer a firsthand look at what happens when the promise of a major technology investment meets the realities of a small Southern community. The proposed Americus data-center campus is planned as a four-phase development of roughly 102 acres, with an eventual buildout of at least 400,000 square feet and an estimated investment of up to $5 billion. The development agreement calls for construction to begin by January 2027 and for the facility to operate for at least 30 years. In this conversation, we explore the questions facing Americus residents: Who benefits from the development? Who bears the costs? What does a project of this scale mean for water, electricity, land, and local infrastructure? And what happens when a community decides it needs to ask difficult questions before an irreversible decision is made?