Musicians Advocate Podcast

Tom's Audio Podcasts
Tom's Audio Podcasts
  • 0.0 (0)
  • Music

The professional platform for independent musicians. Build your profile, get discovered, connect with venues and talent buyers. Free to join.

  1. 1d ago

    The Green Room S05E18 — Artist Development in the Digital Age

    https://musiciansadvocate.org This episode marks a significant transition for The Green Room as beloved host Shane steps down to lead a new artist wellness initiative. Co-host Roger welcomes Devon, known for his work with Soundcheck 305, as the new co-host, ready to bring his unique perspective to the challenges and triumphs of the music industry. • Learn about Shane's new role focusing on mental health and wellness for touring artists. • Meet Devon, the new co-host, bringing a "sommelier for sound" approach to music analysis. • Hear Roger and Devon discuss the increasingly crowded and complex music landscape for emerging artists. • Explore the shift from traditional gatekeepers to algorithm-driven visibility. • Understand the struggle artists face balancing creative work with relentless self-promotion. Here is the full transcript: [SHANE] Welcome back to The Green Room on Musicians Advocate Radio, musiciansadvocate.org. I’m Shane, and as always, I’m here with the incomparable Roger, diving deep into what it takes to make it, to get heard, to build a career in this beautiful, bewildering business. [ROGER] Shane, good to be here, though I hear today marks a bit of a shift in the tectonic plates beneath us, doesn't it? Something about new management for the house band. [SHANE] You heard right, Roger. It’s true. After… well, after what feels like a lifetime behind this particular mic, I’m actually moving over to head up a new Artist Outreach Initiative here at Musicians Advocate. It’s going to be focused on connecting artists directly with resources for mental health and wellness on tour, which is something very near and dear to my heart. [ROGER] That’s good work, Shane. Important work. So, you’ll still be around the old digital water cooler, then. Just not here, talking about 16-track recorders and the folly of streaming royalties. [SHANE] Exactly, Roger. I'll be dropping in from time to time, you can bet on it. But this isn't a farewell, it's a passing of the torch. And speaking of torches, we have a new light illuminating The Green Room today. Someone I’ve admired for a long time, someone who knows the ins and outs of both the creative process and the grind of getting your art out there, especially in the ever-shifting landscape of the modern music scene. Please welcome Devon, who some of you might know from StreamTeam123.com in Miami, where he co-hosts Soundcheck 305. Devon, welcome to The Green Room. [DEVON] Shane, Roger, it’s an honor, truly. And a genuine pleasure to finally be on the mic with both of you. Roger, it’s been a minute, hasn’t it? I still remember those late-night sessions back in the Midwest, dissecting every single note on those German progressive records until the sun came up. [ROGER] (chuckles) Oh, I remember, Devon. I remember. You always had that knack for pulling apart an album like it was a grand surgical procedure. The year, the room, the gear, the players, the mix… you’d get down to the tasting notes of the record, as you always called it. Like a sommelier for vinyl. [DEVON] Well, you know, every great vintage has a story, Roger. And sometimes, understanding that story helps us appreciate the complexity. It’s no different for a new artist trying to find their voice today. The context, the intention, the execution—it all matters. [SHANE] And that’s exactly why Devon is the perfect fit to take the reins here at The Green Room. He brings that deep appreciation for the craft, that investigative spirit, and a real understanding of how artists navigate the currents right now. His work with Soundcheck 305, helping emerging artists in Miami find their platform, really speaks to what we do here at Musicians Advocate. [DEVON] Thank you, Shane. I’m really looking forward to continuing the important conversations you’ve cultivated here. The challenges are real, but so is the talent, and so is the desire to connect. My aim is to help bridge that gap, just as you have. [ROGER] So, the sommelier of sound is in the house. I suppose we’ll have to get used to more talk about top notes and mouthfeel in our discussions about preamps and pedalboards. I just hope you don’t start swishing records around in a glass. [DEVON] (dryly) Only if it's a particularly complex pressing, Roger. You know, a rare 180-gram German import. Might pick up some subtle hints of analog warmth, perhaps a touch of tape saturation… [ROGER] (groans playfully) Oh, it's going to be a long season. [SHANE] (laughing softly) It's going to be a brilliant season, Roger. And on that note, gentlemen, I’ll leave you to it. Devon, Roger, thank you both. And to all our listeners, thank you for letting me share this space with you for so long. I’ll see you around the Advocate. [DEVON] All the best, Shane. We’ll look forward to your visits. [ROGER] Take care, Shane. Don't be a stranger. [SHANE] (fading out) Never. [ROGER] Alright, Devon. The keys are officially yours. Don’t break anything. And try not to make me fall asleep with too much talk about the artisanal nature of a 1972 mellotron. [DEVON] No promises, Roger. But speaking of artisanal… we talk a lot on this show about the art of getting heard, the business of making your way in music. It's a crowded marketplace, more crowded than ever, wouldn't you say? Especially for artists who are just starting out, trying to cut through the noise. [ROGER] Crowded? It’s a sonic mosh pit out there. Back in our day, Devon, back in those misty Midwest prog-rock nights, you needed a demo tape, a beat-up van, and enough beer money to play a dive bar. Now? You need a social media team, a streaming strategy, an EPK that can make a major label A&R scroll past TikTok for more than five seconds… and still, a beat-up van helps for the tours nobody knows about. [DEVON] And that's precisely the challenge, isn't it? The sheer volume of content available makes it harder for any single artist to gain traction. We’ve gone from gatekeepers to algorithm whisperers. The tools are more accessible than ever, which is a double-edged sword. Everyone can make music, but how does anyone *hear* it? How does an artist develop their craft, their business acumen, when they're constantly fighting for visibility? [ROGER] It feels like the industry decided to outsource artist development to the artists themselves. "Here’s a microphone, here’s a laptop, now go make your own buzz, kids! And oh, by the way, we'll take a significant cut of whatever you manage to scrape together." It's a miracle anyone makes it. I remember talking to a young musician who spent more time on her Instagram strategy than on songwriting last week. She was posting daily reels, trying to keep up with some trend… it was exhausting just listening to her. [DEVON] It is exhausting. And it pulls artists away from what they should be focusing on: the music, the performance, the genuine connection. There’s a certain authenticity that gets lost when you’re constantly chasing metrics. It’s like trying to cultivate a rare heirloom tomato in a hydroponic factory. You might get the yield, but does it have the soul? Does it have the terroir? [ROGER] Terroir? Devon, you're doing it again. You're going all sommelier on me already. I almost expected you to ask if it had a hint of petrichor on the finish. [DEVON] (chuckles) Perhaps a faint echo of the garage band practice space, a whisper of late-night inspiration, a dash of that youthful angst… you know, the good stuff. But seriously, Roger, the core of it is, how do artists today get back to that focus while still navigating the realities of the market? How do they own their audience instead of just leasing listeners from a platform? [ROGER] That's the million-dollar question, isn't it? Or probably a hundred-dollar question, considering how much musicians actually make. I always tell the young folks who bring their broken amps into my shop, "Your audience is your most valuable asset. The ones who will show up, buy the merch, tell their friends." But how do you find them in a sea of millions? It used to be you played every open mic, every local festival. You had to be there, in person. Remember those regional festivals, the ones with the dodgy sound systems and the lukewarm beer? We played every one within a three-state radius, didn't we? Just to get a hundred people to remember your name. [DEVON] Oh, I remember. The infamous "Muddy Boots Jamboree" of '98. I think the stage was literally built on hay bales. And I distinctly recall our bass player's amp shorting out mid-solo during our rendition of "The Overture of the Galactic Serpent." Good times. But those experiences, the direct interaction, the handshakes, the shared misery of a rain-soaked tent… those built connections that still resonate for some artists today. You cultivated a fan base, one person at a time. Now, it's all about "reach" and "impressions." [ROGER] And that’s where the industry fails, in my humble opinion. They push for scale, for virality, for the next big thing, without understanding that true artist development takes time, takes nurturing. It’s not an overnight sensation, it’s years of grinding it out, finding your voice, building those relationships. No algorithm can replace that. I mean, do you remember who headlined the smaller stages at the '76 Reading Festival? Probably not. But the bands that opened for them, the ones who sold a few hundred singles from a folding table… those are the artists whose stories resonate. [DEVON] Indeed. That slow burn, that organic growth, it's increasingly difficult to achieve, or even to prioritize, when the pressure is to be instantly clickable. We’ve seen entire careers built on a single viral moment, only to fizzle out because there was no foundation underneath. No real artistry, no sustained connection. It’s like an instant coffee instead of a carefully brewed espresso. It gets the j

    The Green Room S05E18 — Artist Development in the Digital Age

  2. Nov 2

    The Green Room S05E17 — Music, Algorithms, and Audience Connection

    https://musiciansadvocate.org This episode takes a journey from the raw energy and massive crowds of iconic 60s music festivals to the complex, algorithm-driven landscape of today's music industry. The conversation delves into how generative AI is fundamentally reshaping creativity, exploring its role not just as a tool, but as a formidable new competitor for human artists. • Remembering the dedicated crowds and brute-force sound systems of legendary events like the 1969 Texas Pop Festival. • How the music industry's gatekeepers have evolved from labels and radio to algorithms and data. • The "industrialization of creativity" with AI producing vast amounts of music for streaming playlists. • Debating whether AI can ever truly replicate the "human imperfection," groove, and unique feel that defines human art. • The immense challenge for artists trying to break through an overwhelming tide of AI-generated content. Here is the full transcript: [SHANE] Alright, welcome back, everybody, to The Green Room, here on Musicians Advocate dot org. Shane here, alongside my esteemed colleague, Roger. [ROGER] Esteemed, huh? That’s a new one. Hello, folks. Back in the, uh, back in the digital trenches. [SHANE] Digital trenches, indeed. You know, Roger, speaking of trenches… I was thinking the other day about the… the sheer scale of the crowds that used to gather, before all this… this current era of… well, everything being smaller, more niche. Remember that first Texas Pop Festival, back in ’69? Right after Woodstock. [ROGER] Oh, Texas Pop, absolutely. Dallas International Motor Speedway. Had some serious heavyweights there. Janis, Led Zeppelin, Grand Funk Railroad. You know, fun fact, they actually had a… a kind of a skirmish, a little bit of a dust-up, between the local police and the crowd, over a water shortage. Heat was oppressive, I hear. [SHANE] Water shortage… that’s a classic. Always something. People just wanted to hear the music, you know? They’d put up with a lot. The dedication was… something else. [ROGER] They did. And the gear… the gear they brought to those things. Just brute force, tube amps pushed to their limits. No fancy in-ear monitors, no digital processing. Just… raw sound hitting you in the chest. That’s a whole other conversation, though. The evolution of sound reinforcement… the compromises… [SHANE] It is. It truly is. But it brings us to this… this idea of how music gets heard today. How artists connect. Because it’s not just about the gear anymore, is it? Not just about getting up on a stage and blowing the roof off. It’s… it’s a much more complex ecosystem. The gatekeepers have changed. The pathways are… different. [ROGER] Changed, and multiplied. And mutated. It used to be labels, radio stations, then maybe MTV. Now… it’s algorithms. It’s data. It’s… well, it’s a whole different kind of beast, isn’t it? Trying to get your music out there, trying to connect with a real, human audience. It feels like you’re shouting into a hurricane sometimes. [KORKY] If you’re lucky, Roger, it’s just a hurricane. More often, it’s a… a digital void, a vacuum filled with… well, frankly, the same old recycled data that’s been optimized and re-optimized until it’s utterly devoid of soul. Or, worse yet, generated from scratch by an algorithm designed to hit all the right dopamine receptors. [SHANE] Ah, Korky. There he is. Right on cue, with the… the inconvenient truth. Always with the larger context, Korky. Welcome back. [ROGER] Korky Tyson, our resident seer of all things digital and… despairing. Good to hear your mellifluous tones, Korky. What fresh hell are we diving into today? [KORKY] Mellifluous, Roger. A delightful choice of word. And the hell, as you so aptly put it, is hardly fresh. It’s been simmering for years, but now… now it’s boiling over. We’re talking about the… the industrialization of creativity. The rise of generative AI not just as a tool, but as a… a genuine competitor. A replacement, in many cases. [SHANE] Replacement… that’s a strong word, Korky. You’re talking about AI actually writing and performing music that people… want to listen to? And that artists then have to contend with? [KORKY] Contend with? Shane, it’s already happening. We’re seeing platforms flooded with tracks produced, mixed, and mastered by AI. Not just background elevator music, but pieces that are structurally sound, harmonically pleasing, and designed to slot perfectly into mood playlists. They’re cheap to produce, infinitely scalable, and they don’t ask for royalties. They don’t have egos. They don’t tour. They don’t get sick. They don't have bad days. [ROGER] Don't have egos, eh? That's a plus for the session scene. But seriously, Korky, is it really that pervasive? I mean, I hear a lot of talk, a lot of demos, but I still think there's a certain… human imperfection, a feel, that these things just can't replicate. The groove. The grit. The mistakes that make a track interesting. The… the *swing*. [KORKY] And you’re not wrong, Roger, for discerning ears. For the connoisseurs, for those of us who appreciate the… the inherent humanity in art. But think about the vast majority of consumers. The ones who simply want something pleasant for their commute, or a soundtrack for their workout. They don't care if it was a Fender Strat played by a human hand, or a neural network simulating a virtual one. They just want the sound. And the streaming platforms… they *love* it. Low overhead, high volume. Perfect for filling those endless algorithmically-generated playlists that demand constant novelty. [SHANE] So, if an artist is trying to… to break through, to get noticed, they’re not just competing with other human artists, but with a potentially infinite stream of… AI-generated content? That sounds like… like trying to find a single grain of sand on a thousand beaches. [KORKY] Precisely. And that, Shane, is the critical point. The sheer volume. The signal-to-noise ratio is already astronomical. AI doesn't just add to the noise, it *creates* it, tirelessly, relentlessly. And it’s not just music. It’s visual art, it’s narrative, it’s… it’s everything that was once considered the exclusive domain of human creativity. I mean, you know my… my own little brush with that particular dragon. Lost a major voiceover gig to an AI model that could replicate the exact timbre, the exact cadence… for a fraction of the cost. And it didn’t need lunch breaks. Or a publicist. Or a union membership. [ROGER] Yeah, Korky, we remember. Still feels like a gut punch, doesn't it? But what about… what about copyright? Ownership? If an AI generates something, who owns it? The programmer? The company? The original artists whose work it was trained on? That’s a whole legal minefield, isn’t it? An absolute digital swamp. [KORKY] A minefield, Roger, that the legal system is woefully unprepared for. We’re seeing lawsuits, counter-suits, legislative proposals that are already obsolete by the time they hit committee. It's a Wild West. But in the interim, while the lawyers are squabbling, the AI-generated content is proliferating. And it often… *borrows* heavily, shall we say, from existing works. Without attribution. Without compensation. So, artists aren’t just competing against AI, they’re often competing against reflections of their *own* work, repurposed and monetized without their consent. That’s the real sting. [SHANE] That’s… that’s a truly insidious cycle. So, for the musician out there right now, who's pouring their heart into their craft, writing those songs, recording those tracks… what do they do? Do they throw up their hands? Do they… do they try to become an AI whisperer? Do they just… abandon the stage? [KORKY] Neither, Shane. Not entirely. They adapt. They educate themselves. They understand that the landscape has fundamentally shifted. And they double down on what makes them uniquely human. Authenticity. Vulnerability. The story behind the song. The connection with their audience. The human touch that, for now, AI cannot fully replicate. That’s the high ground. [ROGER] So, basically, what we’ve always been telling them to do. Own your audience. Direct connection. EPKs that tell a story, not just list gear. Social media that’s actually *social*, not just an endless feed of promo. Only now, it’s with a fire under it. [KORKY] Precisely, Roger. But now, it's not just good practice, it's existential. You can use AI as a *tool*. Absolutely. Use it for generating social media captions, for identifying target demographics, for optimizing ad spend, even for rudimentary mixing assistance. But the *core* of your artistic output, your unique voice… that must remain unequivocally human. And you must foster those direct relationships with your fans. Build your mailing list. Create experiences that AI cannot deliver. Live shows. Exclusive content. Direct interaction. Personal touches that AI simply cannot conjure. [SHANE] That's where the value is. The irreplaceable human connection. Because, no matter how good an algorithm gets, it can't… it can't look you in the eye from the stage. It can't feel the room. It can't sign an album after the show and ask you where you're from. It can’t sweat. [ROGER] And it definitely can't fix a blown output transformer during soundcheck. Or tell you about the time Keith Richards bought a specific brand of fuzzy distortion pedal that was only made in… well, that’s another story for another day. But yeah, the human element. The sweat. The passion. That's what people connect with, ultimately. That’s why we go to shows. [KORKY] Indeed. The shared experience. The vulnerability of a live performance. The serendipity of a jam session. These are the spaces where human creativity still holds undisputed sway. Bu

    The Green Room S05E17 — Music, Algorithms, and Audience Connection

  3. Oct 26

    The Green Room S05E16 — Artist Development in Modern Music Industry

    https://musiciansadvocate.org This episode dives deep into the seismic shifts in the music industry, exploring the demise of traditional artist development and the rise of "content generation." Our guest, industry insider Korky Tyson, unpacks how labels are now harvesting data instead of cultivating talent, and the immense challenges this poses for emerging artists. • The "golden era" of labels investing in artists for multiple albums is now a historical artifact. • Artist development has been replaced by content generation, with labels focused on virality over longevity. • Artists are forced to be their own labels, marketing departments, and A&R, an absurd and resource-intensive task. • Platforms act as digital landlords, renting access to audiences whose engagement can be wiped out by algorithm changes. • The advent of AI-generated music presents a new, relentless tide of competition for human artists. Here is the full transcript: [SHANE] Welcome back, everybody, to The Green Room, here on Musicians Advocate Radio, musiciansadvocate.org. Always good to have you with us. I’m Shane, of course, and to my left, always deep in the guts of some vintage tube, Mr. Roger. [ROGER] Shane, good to be here, though the guts of that tube are certainly no place for a gentleman. Just saying. [SHANE] Indeed. Indeed. And today, we are fortunate enough to be joined by a gentleman who is always deep in the guts of the *industry*, whether he likes it or not. The one, the only... Korky Tyson. [KORKY] Thank you, Shane, Roger. It is indeed a pleasure, as always, to be allowed to shed some light on the… let’s call them… *less obvious* currents moving beneath the placid surface of the modern music business. It’s certainly not a gentle stream these days. More like an undertow, really. [ROGER] Or a rip current, for half the artists out there. You know, we talk a lot about the gear, the craft, the performance… but man, getting heard today? Getting *developed* today? It feels like you’re paddling upstream with a broken oar. [SHANE] It’s a completely different landscape, isn’t it? The concept of "artist development" — that golden era where a label would sign a band, invest in them for two, three albums, let them find their sound, build a following… that’s a fairy tale now. Almost feels like a historical artifact. [ROGER] A relic. Like a germanium transistor in a modern pedal. Nobody’s gonna drop that kind of cash on an unknown anymore, not when every kid with a laptop can put out an album a week. It’s not just broken, Shane, it’s… gone. The whole infrastructure. [KORKY] Precisely, Roger. And it’s worse than merely “gone.” It’s been *replaced* by something far more insidious. We’re no longer talking about "artist development"; we’re discussing "content generation." The shift is profound. Labels, or what remains of them, are no longer cultivating talent; they’re harvesting data. They're looking for virality, not longevity. A momentary flicker, not a slow burn. [SHANE] Harvesting data. Hmm. That’s a stark way to put it, Korky, but… probably accurate. So, for the emerging artist out there, the one with real talent, real songs, but no built-in audience of millions… what’s the path? If the labels aren’t doing the heavy lifting of artist development, who is? [KORKY] Well, Shane, ostensibly, the artist themselves. But that’s a fool’s errand in many respects. Imagine being told, “You are now solely responsible for being your own record label, your own marketing department, your own booking agent, your own A&R… and oh yes, continue to produce compelling, original art in your spare time.” It’s absurd. The resources required are astronomical. The knowledge base is immense. [ROGER] And the tools they give you for all this? A few analytics dashboards on Spotify that tell you nothing useful, and an Instagram algorithm that changes every Tuesday. My old boss used to say, “If it’s free, *you’re* the product.” And that’s what these platforms are doing. They’re selling *you* to advertisers, not selling *your music* to fans. [KORKY] Roger, you’ve encapsulated the core dilemma with admirable brevity. The platforms, these so-called facilitators of global reach, are simply digital landlords. You are renting space. Your audience? You don’t own them; you're renting access *to* them. And the terms of that lease can change at any moment. Overnight, your meticulously cultivated follower count can be rendered irrelevant by a tweak to the algorithm, a shift in preferred media format, or the introduction of a new "engagement metric" that rewards… well, whatever it is they decide to reward that week. [SHANE] It’s a moving target, isn’t it? One minute it’s short-form video, the next it’s audio-only, then back to long-form, then a new platform pops up and everyone scrambles… [ROGER] Remember when MySpace was the be-all, end-all? Everyone had their custom profile page, their top 8 friends… Bands lived and died by MySpace. You could actually discover new music on there. Now, try to find a new band on Facebook. Good luck. [KORKY] Ah, MySpace. A simpler time. Before the age of the ubiquitous algorithm. Before the platforms realized they could monetize *attention* more effectively than *art*. And before the inevitable encroachment of, shall we say, synthesized creativity. [SHANE] Synthesized creativity. You're talking about AI, Korky? I figured that would come up. [KORKY] Of course it comes up, Shane. It *must* come up. It’s not just a technical innovation; it’s a philosophical shift. When a machine can generate a commercially viable track, complete with lyrics, melody, and arrangement, in a matter of minutes, what does that do to the perceived value of human artistic endeavor? And if a platform can then push that AI-generated content through its algorithms, seamlessly integrating it into playlists… well, the playing field, already tilted, becomes a precipice. [ROGER] Hold on, Korky. You’re not still reeling from that animated series deal, are you? The one that went to the AI character instead of… [KORKY] (A sharp intake of breath) Roger, my personal experiences, while undeniably instructive, are not the point. The point is the systemic impact. The *reality* that artists are not only competing against millions of other human artists but now against an exponentially growing tide of machine-generated, algorithmically optimized "content." Content that never asks for royalties, never demands a tour bus, never complains about the catering. [SHANE] Never complains about the catering… now *that* is a feature, not a bug, in some ways. But seriously, Korky, you’re right. It’s a fundamental challenge. So, if artist development as we knew it is dead, if platforms are essentially landlords extracting rent, and if AI is creating an endless stream of competition… what’s the actual advice for a working musician trying to build a career right now? How do they even make an effective Electronic Press Kit, for example, if the gatekeepers are algorithms instead of human A&R reps? [KORKY] The EPK, Shane, has evolved. It’s no longer a static document; it’s a dynamic portfolio. It’s less about a glossy PDF you send to an A&R, and more about a carefully curated digital footprint. Your social media presence, your streaming numbers, your engagement metrics – love them or loathe them – these *are* your new EPK. But with a critical distinction: you must possess what I refer to as "digital proprietorship." [ROGER] Digital proprietorship. Sounds like something I should talk to my lawyer about. [KORKY] You should, Roger. It means owning your audience, truly owning them. Not just renting access through Instagram or TikTok. It means building an email list. Direct-to-fan communication. Creating a private community. A Bandcamp page where *you* set the terms and get a fair share, rather than the abysmal fractions of pennies from Spotify. It's about disintermediation. Cutting out the middleman. Because these platforms, as vast and ubiquitous as they are, are not truly on your side. Their business model is not aligned with yours. [SHANE] So, it's about building your own little walled garden, so to speak, within the wild west of the internet. A place where you control the narrative, you control the access, and you control the relationship with your fans. [ROGER] Reminds me of the early days of indie labels, before the big guys swallowed everyone up. You had your small mailing list, you sold tapes out of the trunk of your car… or CD-Rs, depending on when you started. It was direct. You actually *knew* your fans. You had their names. [SHANE] Korky, you've always been one to connect the dots between the grand machinations of venture capital and the musician trying to pay rent. What’s driving this platform behavior, this push for “content creation” over “artist development”? Is it just about advertising dollars, or is there something deeper? [KORKY] It’s always deeper, Shane. It’s about asset acquisition and market dominance. These platforms are not merely media companies; they are data companies. They accrue value not just from ad revenue but from the sheer volume of user data they collect. Every click, every listen, every share—it all feeds into a larger model of predictive analytics and behavioral targeting. Art, in this context, becomes a highly effective lure. The more "content" they can facilitate, whether human or AI-generated, the more users they attract, the more data they gather, and the more indispensable they become. It’s a network effect, designed to consolidate power and make switching costs prohibitive. [ROGER] So the artist is just… bait. Interesting. That’s a bleak assessment. But it makes sense when you look at how little most musicians get paid by the streamers. It’s like they don’t actually want to

    The Green Room S05E16 — Artist Development in Modern Music Industry

  4. Oct 19

    The Green Room S05E15 — AI, content creation, musician advocacy

    https://musiciansadvocate.org This week, the hosts are joined by a familiar voice, bringing a critical perspective on the latest industry "innovations." They dive deep into the rapidly evolving world of generative AI and its impact on musicians, exploring the promises and perils of automated content creation. • How new AI tools are being marketed as a "panacea" for artists' content demands. • The potential for AI to homogenize artistic voice and erode originality. • Concerns about platforms prioritizing AI-generated content over human creativity. • Understanding the "siren song" of efficiency versus the burden of authenticity. • A personal anecdote about losing a creative project to AI for "cost-effectiveness." Here is the full transcript: [SHANE] Welcome back… to The Green Room. Musicians Advocate Radio… musiciansadvocate.org. Just two lifers… talking shop. And sometimes… a third. [ROGER] Or a fourth, depending on who wanders in for the free coffee. Though I think Korky drank all of that this morning. [SHANE] He does have a… particular thirst for our artisanal blend. Probably… keeps him sharp. For all the… grand insights he brings to the table. [ROGER] Speaking of tables, Shane, you remember the year they had that one stage at Glastonbury, must’ve been ’94, where the entire audience section was just… picnic tables? You couldn’t even mosh, you had to politely ask people to pass the coleslaw. [SHANE] Ah, yes… the year of the Great Coleslaw Riots. Or was it… the Great Potato Salad Peace Accord? Details are hazy… but I do recall… someone attempting a stage dive… onto a family of four… having a quiet picnic. It didn’t end well… for the deviled eggs. [ROGER] Nah, that was Reading ‘96, man. Totally different vibe. The Glastonbury picnic table stage, that was the year the sound engineer tried to mix the entire set through a Fisher-Price toy mixer he found in a hedge. Said it had a ‘unique sonic warmth.’ Didn’t even last two songs before it melted. [SHANE] A unique sonic warmth… that melted. Sounds about right… for some of the… *innovations* we’ve seen in… artist development lately. Always a new toy… always a new… promise. [ROGER] Exactly. And half the time, it’s just someone repackaging old ideas with a new buzzword, trying to get artists to buy into something that doesn’t actually help them reach ears or build a career. It’s always about the platform, never the player. [KORKY] A rather… prescient observation, Roger. And quite opportune. [SHANE] Speak of the devil… and he appears. The air… just got heavier. Korky Tyson… joining us in The Green Room. [ROGER] Korky! You got new glasses or something? You’re radiating even more… gravitas than usual. [KORKY] Merely a heightened sense of… professional urgency. I happened to overhear your current discourse regarding… shall we say… the cyclical nature of promotional chicanery. And I must interject, because what is currently unfolding in the broader digital landscape is not merely a repackaging. It is… an evolution. A rather… insidious one, at that. [SHANE] Insidious… You have our attention, Korky. What new… technological marvel… has caught your… discerning eye? [KORKY] It is not a singular marvel, Shane, but rather a confluence. We are witnessing the maturation, and indeed, the aggressive commodification, of generative AI across all creative industries. Specifically, for our musician friends, we are seeing an explosion of tools being marketed directly to them as the panacea for content creation. [ROGER] Oh, you mean like those apps that write your social media posts for you? Or generate a dozen different captions for your new single? I’ve seen those. Just sounds like a fancy spell-checker to me. What’s the big deal? [KORKY] The "big deal," Roger, is that these tools are becoming increasingly sophisticated. They aren't just generating text anymore. They are synthesizing entire marketing campaigns, crafting video scripts, even proposing melodic fragments or lyrical themes based on an artist's previous output or a desired genre. They promise to solve the artist's perennial problem: the insatiable demand for *content* across an ever-expanding array of platforms. "Never run out of ideas! Automate your social media presence! Maximize your reach!"—that is the siren song. [SHANE] The siren song… Korky. Sounds a lot like… the auto-tune revolution. Or the… home studio revolution. Each promising… liberation… but often delivering… a different kind of… burden. [KORKY] Precisely, Shane. The promise is efficiency, reach, and a leveling of the playing field. The reality, however, is far more complex. Consider the implications for authenticity. If an artist's social media presence, their very public voice, is largely being crafted by an algorithm, where does the genuine connection with the audience reside? Is the artist merely becoming a curator of AI-generated personality? [ROGER] You're telling me it's like using an AI to choose your amp settings? Or even worse, to *design* your amp settings? No, thanks. I like the human touch, the accidental feedback, the imperfections that make it *real*. I bet these AI things just make everything sound… beige. Or look… beige. [KORKY] Beige is a rather… astute descriptor, Roger. The inherent danger is a homogenization of artistic voice. As these models are trained on vast datasets of existing content, they tend to optimize for what has proven "successful" in the past, leading to a subtle but pervasive erosion of true originality. Furthermore, the platforms themselves—the very conduits through which artists seek to be heard—are increasingly prioritizing and rewarding AI-generated content. Why? Because it’s cheap, it's scalable, and it keeps users engaged in a superficially novel way, often at the expense of genuine human creativity. I mean, I personally… witnessed a situation, not so long ago, where a rather lucrative voiceover project… which I was, I might add, quite well-suited for… was ultimately awarded to an AI-generated character. The producers… cited "cost-effectiveness" and "unlimited availability." It was… instructive. [SHANE] Cost-effectiveness… and unlimited availability. That’s the dream… for the industry. Not always… for the artist. So Korky… what’s the play here? Do artists embrace this… with open arms… or do they… barricade the studio door? [KORKY] Neither, entirely. The technology is here, and it is advancing exponentially. To ignore it would be… naive. However, to blindly adopt it as a complete outsourcing solution for one’s entire artistic persona would be… perilous. Artists must understand these tools for what they are: *tools*. Not collaborators, not replacements for their unique voice or vision. They can be employed for mundane, repetitive tasks—generating initial drafts of emails, scheduling social media posts, perhaps even brainstorming very generic ideas—but the final artistic stamp, the *personality*, the *humanity*, must remain firmly in the artist’s hands. [ROGER] So it’s like using a really fancy, super-fast drum machine. You can program it to play whatever you want, but it still sounds… programmed. Until a real drummer takes it and messes with it, gives it some swing, some ghost notes, some *feel*. That’s the difference. The AI gives you the notes, the artist gives it the *music*. [KORKY] An apt analogy, Roger. The danger is that the platforms will begin to implicitly or explicitly demand that level of AI-assisted output, simply because it means more content, more engagement, more data points for them to monetize. Artists could find themselves in a position where their organically created content is simply drowned out by a deluge of AI-generated material that is subtly favored by the algorithms. This is not about efficiency for the artist; it’s about efficiency for the platform. [SHANE] So the battle… is not against the AI itself… but against the expectation… that we all become… content factories. Which is… precisely what they’ve been pushing… for years now. This is just… the next iteration. [KORKY] Precisely, Shane. And the critical element for artists is to understand that true artist development has always been about cultivating a unique voice, building genuine relationships with an audience, and delivering authentic experiences. These AI tools, while seemingly offering shortcuts, can, paradoxically, dilute the very essence of what makes an artist compelling. They must be used with extreme caution and always as a subservient aid, never as the primary creative engine. The moment an artist outsources their core identity to an algorithm, they risk becoming indistinguishable from the digital white noise. [ROGER] And then what’s the point? If you’re just another soundalike, another generic social media feed, why would anyone bother? You gotta give people a reason to stick around, something *you* bring to the table. Not some algorithm’s idea of what sells. That’s what’s been missing in the industry for years, though. Artist development used to be about finding unique voices and nurturing them. Now it's about finding out who can churn out the most content to feed the beast. [SHANE] The beast… always hungry. Korky… thank you for shining… your rather piercing light… on this particular beast. Always… enlightening. [KORKY] Always a pleasure, gentlemen. The warning, as ever, is free. The vigilance… well, that costs a little more. You keep that artisanal blend flowing. [ROGER] We’ll keep the coffee flowing, Korky. Thanks for the heads-up. Shane, you remember the festival where they tried to power the main stage with static electricity from the crowd? Electric Picnic, I think it was called. Back in the early 2000s? [SHANE] Electric Picnic… that was the one where… the sound c

    The Green Room S05E15 — AI, content creation, musician advocacy

  5. Oct 5

    The Green Room S05E14 — Sunday Oct 4

    https://musiciansadvocate.org This episode dives into the ever-shifting landscape of the music industry, exploring the impact of AI-generated content on artists' visibility and income. The conversation unpacks the "Great Content Deluge" and how AI-driven curation is fundamentally changing how music is discovered and valued. • The relentless challenges artists face, from tech shifts to new streaming algorithms. • Here is the full transcript: [SHANE] Welcome back to The Green Room, on Musicians Advocate Radio, musiciansadvocate.org. Just two lifers, sometimes three, talking shop… about what it means to be an artist in the current climate. It’s a climate that… well, it always feels like a storm coming in, doesn’t it, Roger? [ROGER] Always, Shane. Or like the forecast changes completely every other Tuesday. You think you’ve got your setup dialled in for the gig, then the venue decides to go digital-only, no amps allowed, or some new streaming algorithm drops that makes your last six months of work disappear from playlists. [SHANE] Ah, the ever-shifting sands beneath our feet… I remember once, back in ’78, at the Summer Jam in Watkins Glen… the sound guy just… packed up and left. Mid-set. Left the whole rig for the roadies to figure out. Said he’d had enough of the humidity ruining his tubes. [ROGER] Watkins Glen, ’78, huh? I thought that was the year they had the infamous "Great Stage Short-Out" due to a rogue lightning strike during Santana’s soundcheck. Or was that ’73? The one where the PA for the second stage blew a transformer the size of a mini-fridge, and they had to run everything through a single mono mix for the rest of the day? Nobody could tell what was what. [SHANE] You might be right about the transformer… the humidity part, though, that was definitely ’78. It was like playing inside a hot, wet blanket. Speakers were sweating. Amps were just… groaning. You had to practically dry-ice the cabinets just to keep the caps from bulging. [ROGER] Oh, I know that feeling. Been there, seen that. The heat on some of those old tube amps… you could cook an egg on the chassis. But speaking of things heating up, and things groaning… and things that are sometimes hard to tell what’s what… we have a returning guest with us today. He usually brings us the news before it’s even news. The man, the myth, the legend… Korky Tyson. [KORKY] Gentlemen. Always a distinct pleasure to rejoin you in this, your… digital salon. Shane, Roger. I trust you are both well, and have not yet succumbed entirely to the siren song of algorithmic supremacy, or indeed, the insidious whisper of AI-generated jingles infiltrating the subconscious. [SHANE] Korky. Good to hear your voice, old friend. Though I must admit, I just heard a jingle for a new brand of artisanal artisanal mayonnaise that had a very… familiar harmonic structure. I wondered if I’d heard it before… or if it just *felt* like I had. [ROGER] See, Korky, you’ve already got Shane questioning reality. What fresh hell are you bringing to our attention this week? Is it another platform merger we didn’t ask for? Another royalty rate adjustment that leaves us all scratching our heads and wondering if we owe *them* money now? [KORKY] Well, Roger, your cynicism is, as always, both refreshing and entirely justified. But no, not a merger this time… at least, not in the traditional sense. What I’m seeing, quite clearly now, is a seismic shift in the very *fabric* of artist visibility and income, driven by what I can only describe as the "Great Content Deluge"… primarily fueled by generative AI. [SHANE] The Great Content Deluge… sounds like the name of a prog-rock concept album from ’75. I’d listen to that. What does that mean for the working musician, Korky? Is it more noise to cut through? Or is it something more… systemic? [KORKY] It is precisely that, Shane. More systemic. We are moving from an era of platform-driven discovery to an era of *AI-driven curation*. Think about it: every streaming service, every social media feed, every short-form video app… they are all becoming sophisticated AI gatekeepers. And now, they’re not just curating human-created content; they’re dealing with an exponential increase in AI-generated tracks, songs, and even entire virtual artists. [ROGER] AI-generated artists… I knew it. That’s what I’m talking about with the shifting sands. How are you supposed to compete with something that doesn’t need to eat, sleep, or pay rent? Or even learn an instrument? Or, for that matter, *feel* anything? [KORKY] Precisely, Roger. And here’s the rub: these AI-driven systems are optimizing for *engagement*. Not necessarily for quality, not for originality, and certainly not for artist development in the traditional sense. They are looking for patterns that keep listeners hooked, and generative AI can produce an infinite stream of content tailored to those patterns. The problem is, many of these patterns are derived from… well, from *human* artists. From *you*. From *us*. [SHANE] So, they’re feeding our own creative output into the machine… to create more output… that then competes with us… for less money… on platforms that are harder to get noticed on… because of the sheer volume of this new, machine-made content? Am I tracking this correctly, Korky? My head always starts to swim when we talk about this cycle. It feels a bit like a self-eating snake, doesn’t it? [KORKY] An ouroboros, Shane, yes. A particularly hungry one that has developed a taste for intellectual property. What we’re witnessing is a massive devaluation of human creative work, not necessarily by malicious intent, but by sheer, unadulterated *volume*. When the supply of "listenable" audio becomes infinite, the perceived value of any single track—or any single *artist*—diminishes dramatically. The platforms benefit from endless content; the artists… less so. [ROGER] So, what does a band in a garage in Ohio, just trying to get their first EP out, do about this? They’re already facing a mountain to climb, getting noticed on Spotify or TikTok. Now they’ve got to out-create a supercomputer? [KORKY] That is the existential question, isn’t it, Roger? And the answer, as frustrating as it may sound, lies in a re-emphasis on what technology cannot (yet) replicate: authenticity, human connection, and genuine community. The platforms, with their AI gatekeepers, are becoming less about discovery and more about *validation* of existing, strong connections. [SHANE] So… owning your audience… that becomes even more critical now. Even more than it ever was when we started talking about it all those years ago. The email list, the direct fan engagement, the merch table after the show… the human touch. [KORKY] Absolutely, Shane. The direct relationship is paramount. Email lists, private community platforms, exclusive content for patrons, even just good old-fashioned meet-and-greets after a show. These are the fortresses against the deluge. The AI can process gigabytes of audio, but it cannot authentically share a post-show beer with a fan who just drove three hours to see you play. It cannot sign a t-shirt with a personal message that makes that fan feel seen, feel like they're part of something real. [ROGER] Right, so you’re saying musicians need to spend less time trying to game the algorithms, and more time actually building a *fanbase*? Which, honestly, sounds like what we should have been telling them all along. But it’s harder now, isn’t it? When everyone’s attention is so fragmented by the same algorithms. [KORKY] It is harder, Roger, because the noise floor is so much higher. But the strategy remains the same, merely amplified in its necessity. Understand that the platforms are tools for *amplification* once you have a core, not necessarily for *initial genesis* of that core. Use social media to drive people to your email list, to your Bandcamp, to your Patreon, to your *website*—where you control the narrative and the data. Do not build your house on rented land. [SHANE] Never build your house on rented land. That’s an oldie but a goodie, Korky. A Green Room classic. So, for the emerging artist, an EPK still matters, right? But maybe the focus of that EPK shifts a little… it’s not just about showcasing the music, but about showcasing the *human behind the music*? The story? The connection? [KORKY] Precisely. An EPK must now articulate not just your sound, but your *soul*. Who are you? What do you stand for? What unique human experience do you bring to your art? Because that is the only thing that distinguishes you from a perfectly competent, infinitely scalable AI that can mimic any genre, any style, any vocal timbre. Your *story* is your brand now. Your *vulnerability* is your strength. Your *imperfections* are your unique selling proposition. [ROGER] I like that. Imperfections are your unique selling proposition. That’ll preach. So, artists need to double down on what makes them… human. Their individual voice, their specific history, the mistakes they make on stage because they’re *human*. [KORKY] Indeed. And to be vigilant. The tech companies will continue to push the boundaries of what AI can do, and the regulations, if they ever catch up, will always be playing catch-up. Artists must be aware of how their work is being used, how their data is being ingested, and how to protect their unique human spark. Don't be afraid to experiment with AI as a tool, but never let it become the master of your creative process or your identity. [SHANE] It’s a bit like learning to drive a fast car, Korky. You learn to control it, you learn its quirks, you don’t let it drive *you*. You respect its power… but you always have your hands on the wheel. [KORKY] An apt analogy, Shane. Though I would add, ensure you own the car, the road, and preferably, t

    The Green Room S05E14 — Sunday Oct 4

  6. Sep 28

    The Green Room S05E13 — Artist Development

    https://musiciansadvocate.org This episode explores the ever-changing world of artist development, dissecting how musicians Here is the full transcript: [SHANE] Welcome back to The Green Room, on Musicians Advocate Radio dot org. It's Sunday, September 27th, 2026, and we're talking about the ever-shifting sands beneath the feet of every artist trying to make a living, trying to get heard… trying to just exist in this wild new world of music. [ROGER] Wild is right, Shane. Sometimes it feels less like an industry and more like a high-stakes scavenger hunt, where the clues change every Tuesday. [SHANE] And the map… the map is always being redrawn, isn't it? Today, we’re digging into artist development. What does it even mean anymore? The whole ecosystem has just… morphed. Disappeared, in some cases. Reappeared in another form, usually less artist-friendly. We’ve seen the major labels all but abandon true artist development, right? The long-term nurturing, the investment over several albums… that’s largely gone. [ROGER] Gone, like the warmth from a vacuum tube after the power's cut. Poof. Now, they want a fully formed, fully viral, self-sufficient entity that already has a million TikTok followers, a finished album, and a tour bus running on good vibes. And then they want to scoop up a big percentage of whatever you’ve already built. [SHANE] Yeah. Which leaves the heavy lifting… the actual *development*… to the artist themselves. And that means understanding so much more than just making great music. It means understanding the business of getting heard. So let's start with the basics, or what used to be the basics. The EPK. The Electronic Press Kit. Still a thing, Roger? [ROGER] Oh, it’s still a thing, Shane, but it’s not just a PDF in an email anymore. That’s like showing up to a gig with a cassette demo. It’s got to be dynamic. It’s got to be a living, breathing digital hub. We’re talking a dedicated page on your website, not just a Dropbox link. That page needs high-res photos, right? Not just one, a gallery. A polished bio, yes, but also short, punchy quotes from reputable sources. Streaming links, sure, but also direct links to purchase your music, your merch. Tour dates. Contact info, clearly visible. [SHANE] And the video… a good EPK needs video, right? Not just a lyric video. [ROGER] Absolutely. A professional, well-shot live performance clip, maybe a short, engaging interview. Something that shows not just what you *sound* like, but what you *are* like. Your stage presence. Your vibe. And it all needs to be mobile-optimized. Most bookers, most journalists, they’re checking that stuff on their phones, probably between flights. If it’s clunky, if it takes forever to load, they’re gone. Swipe. Next. It’s brutal. [KORKY] If I may interject, gentlemen, the very concept of the "press kit" is undergoing a significant metamorphosis, not merely in its format, but in its fundamental purpose. It’s no longer about merely informing the gatekeepers—the traditional media, the labels—but about captivating the *audience* directly. The lines have blurred, you see. Your EPK now serves as much as a public-facing discovery tool as it does an industry pitch. And this, of course, brings us to the elephant in the room… the omnipresent, omnivorous beast of social media and its ever-shifting algorithms. [SHANE] Ah, Korky Tyson. Just in time to remind us of the beast. Good to have you with us, my friend. [ROGER] Speaking of beasts, remember the one at Woodstock ’94, the mudslide during Metallica? Everyone was just… consumed. That was a beast. [KORKY] A beast of meteorological origin, Roger, not one engineered by venture capitalists in Silicon Valley to extract your creative essence and monetize your attention span. But yes, the mud was rather… pervasive. The point, gentlemen, is that artists are now compelled to be content creators first, musicians second. And the platforms—TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, even those nascent, ephemeral VR spaces—they demand constant feeding. And they demand it in a very specific, often soul-crushing, way. [SHANE] The algorithm… it’s a capricious god. [KORKY] Indeed. And an increasingly opaque one. What many artists fail to grasp is that these algorithms are not designed to promote *art*. They are designed to promote *engagement*. And engagement, quite often, means controversy, spectacle, or something just catchy enough to scroll past quickly, but not so deep as to require actual thought. And with the rise of sophisticated AI tools, creating such "content" is becoming alarmingly easy for non-artists, or even for AI-generated personas. [ROGER] Oh, here we go. The AI bogeyman. [KORKY] Not a bogeyman, Roger, a very real, very present threat to the creative economy. I’ve seen firsthand how an AI-generated character, fully voiced, fully animated, with a backstory meticulously crafted by large language models, can secure an endorsement deal that a human artist, with actual talent and a real fanbase, was in line for. This isn’t science fiction. This is today. And these algorithms? They can be fed, they can be gamed, by AI-generated content just as easily, often more efficiently, than by human creations. So, for the independent artist, the battle for visibility becomes not just against other human artists, but against an increasingly sophisticated machine-generated wave. [SHANE] So if the platforms are a losing game… or at least a highly rigged one… what's the play for the artist, Korky? How do you carve out a space, how do you genuinely connect and own your audience, when the very ground you're building on is constantly shifting, constantly demanding more? [KORKY] Precisely, Shane. The answer, ironically, lies in the oldest forms of connection, digitally re-imagined. You must own your audience. And by that, I mean direct access. An email list. A solid, engaging newsletter. A private community, perhaps on a platform you control or at least one with more artist-friendly terms, where you can communicate directly without the capricious whims of an algorithm deciding if your message is worthy of being seen. This is your life raft. This is your true asset. Your followers on social media are not *your* audience; they are the platform's audience, temporarily loaned to you. [ROGER] He’s right, you know. I see so many artists obsessing over follower counts. Which is a vanity metric. You could have a million followers and sell ten t-shirts. But if you have a thousand engaged people on an email list, those are your true fans. Those are the ones who show up, who buy the merch, who back the Kickstarter. Those are your patrons, in the true sense of the word. And that’s where the industry has failed, isn't it? They've pushed artists onto these platforms without adequately educating them on how to actually build a sustainable career *off* of them. [SHANE] The industry has always been about extraction, hasn't it? Always looking for the next gold rush, without much thought for the miners. The early streaming era… remember the hype? "Democratizing music," they said. Everyone gets a chance. And now… it's just a new form of gatekeeping, a new form of consolidation, with different gatekeepers. The numbers for individual artists… it's just grim. [KORKY] Grim is an understatement, Shane. The average per-stream payout, even for independent artists on aggregators, remains in the fractions of a penny. And with the recent shifts by major streaming platforms—altering their payout structures, de-emphasizing tracks below a certain play count, even imposing minimum thresholds for monetization—it's becoming an almost insurmountable challenge for developing artists to earn anything meaningful from streaming alone. This isn’t a bug in the system; it’s a feature. It concentrates power, it consolidates revenue, and it drives artists to generate more and more "content" for less and less return. It's a race to the bottom, meticulously engineered. [ROGER] And then they slap you with "artist tools" that just let you promote *their* platform more. Like you’re their unpaid marketing intern. It’s all a shell game. You want to survive? You need to diversify. Merchandise. Direct sales of digital downloads. Patrons on platforms like Patreon. Small, intimate gigs where you can actually make some money at the door and merch table. Lessons. Sync licensing. Anything but putting all your eggs in the streaming basket. [SHANE] It feels like we've come full circle, in a way. Back to the days when the band had to be everything: the musicians, the promoters, the booking agents, the merch sellers, the publicists. Only now, you have to be all of that, plus a video editor, a social media manager, and a data analyst. It's a lot to ask of someone whose primary passion is, you know, making music. [KORKY] And who, in this fragmented landscape, is truly fostering that talent? Who is providing the guidance, the financial support, the incubation period that true artistic development requires? The labels, as we've established, are largely out of that business. Educational institutions provide technical skills, but rarely the entrepreneurial acumen needed for this hyper-accelerated environment. It's a void. A vacuum where artists are expected to conjure success from sheer willpower and, increasingly, from the fleeting attention of an audience overwhelmed by choice and inundated by machine-generated noise. [ROGER] It’s like trying to find a needle in a haystack, only the haystack is made of needles, and half of them are AI. [SHANE] Remember, Roger, when they tried to find Jimmy Page at the Bath Festival in '70? He was supposed to play acoustic but got lost somewhere between the main stage and the tea tent. Had to send a whole road crew looking for him. Now *that* was a needle in a haystack. [ROGER] Ha, yeah, and he probably didn't even have a cell phone

    The Green Room S05E13 — Artist Development

  7. Sep 21

    The Green Room S05E12 — Artist Development

    https://musiciansadvocate.org The modern music landscape is noisier and more complex than ever, but Here is the full transcript: [SHANE] Welcome back to The Green Room, on Musicians Advocate Radio, musiciansadvocate.org. It’s a Sunday here, another chance for us to talk about what really matters in this business… and what really gets ignored. Artist development, the business of getting heard… that’s our wheelhouse. Always has been. [ROGER] Always will be, Shane, because the landscape changes every five minutes, but the core problems? They just mutate. Still trying to get a fair shake, still trying to make a living, still trying to cut through the noise. Feels like more noise than ever these days, honestly. [SHANE] More noise, more algorithms… less clarity. It’s a puzzle, isn’t it? How to get your music out there, how to build a career in a world that seems designed to… well, to make it harder. Seems like you’ve been looking particularly contemplative today, Roger. You got that look. [ROGER] Just thinking about the old ways, man. The simplicity. You cut a record, you sent it to radio, you played gigs. Now it’s like… fifty different platforms, a hundred different metrics, and a thousand different gurus telling you to “monetize your personal brand” or something equally vague. [KORKY] If I may interject, gentlemen, because you’re both skirting around the periphery of a much larger, more systemic shift that is… well, it’s not just noise, Roger. It’s a paradigm quake. And it directly impacts everything an emerging artist attempts to do. [SHANE] Korky Tyson. I knew I felt a disturbance in the force. Glad you could make it, Korky. What deep truths have the algorithms whispered in your ear this week? Or is it more of a primal scream from the depths of Silicon Valley? [ROGER] Korky, man. Good to see you. Sounds like you’ve got something brewing. Another industry consolidation? Another streaming service pulling a fast one? Tell us it’s not another metadata debacle. Please. [KORKY] Worse, Roger. Much, much worse. We’re discussing the very essence of artistic creation and the means of its remuneration. The tectonic plates of entertainment are not merely shifting; they are grinding against each other with a force that threatens to destabilize the entire ecosystem, particularly for the nascent artist. [SHANE] Alright, Korky. Give it to us straight. What specific catastrophe is bubbling up from the digital underworld this time that musicians need to prepare for? Because catastrophe is usually your preamble. [KORKY] It’s artificial intelligence, gentlemen. But not in the simplistic terms of merely generating a song, though that is happening with alarming velocity. No, I refer to the *integration* of AI across every facet of content creation, distribution, and yes, *audience capture*. The ability of these models to not only create but also to *identify* and *exploit* trends with unprecedented speed and efficiency. And the financial implications for the human artist are… dire. [ROGER] So you’re saying AI is getting so good it’s not just making music, it’s figuring out what people *want* to hear, and then making that, too? Like a super-powered A&R, but without the coke habit and the terrible taste in shirts? [KORKY] Precisely, Roger. Imagine a system that analyzes millions of data points—listener preferences, chord progressions, lyrical themes, emotional responses, even neuro-linguistic patterns—and then generates content perfectly optimized for virality, for engagement, for repeat listens. And it can do so at scale. Infinitely. Without sleep, without ego, without demanding a royalty split beyond the initial infrastructure cost. [SHANE] So where does that leave the human musician, then… the person who spends years honing their craft, writing from their heart… pouring their soul into an album? Are we talking about a world where the human touch is just… a novelty? Or a luxury? [KORKY] It becomes a differentiator, Shane, but one that is increasingly difficult to monetize within the existing framework. If a platform can generate infinite variations of popular music at near-zero cost, the value of *your* individual track, which required weeks of blood, sweat, and emotional labor, diminishes rapidly in the marketplace. We've seen similar patterns in other creative industries, of course. My own experience, as you know, with the animated series… it was a chilling foretaste of what’s coming for music. [ROGER] Man, I remember when digital audio workstations first came out, people were worried it’d put studio musicians out of business. It changed things, sure, but musicians still played. This feels different, Korky. This feels like the machines are not just making the tools, they’re making the *art* itself. [KORKY] It’s fundamentally different, Roger. Those DAWs were instruments. This is… an autonomous creative entity. What does an artist do when the very concept of unique human expression is commodified and then mass-produced by an algorithm? The struggle for visibility, for fair compensation, for mere *attention*—already Herculean—becomes Sisyphean. [SHANE] So if the traditional avenues—streaming, major labels, social media feeds—are going to be flooded by AI-generated content… what’s the play? What’s the move for an artist who wants to keep creating, keep performing, keep connecting? How do they carve out a space? [KORKY] This is where the concept of *owning your audience* becomes not merely a shrewd business strategy, but a fundamental act of artistic self-preservation. You cannot cede your relationship with your listeners to an algorithm. You cannot allow platforms to be the sole gatekeepers of your visibility. [ROGER] Owning your audience… so, like, direct email lists? Patreons? Physical merch? Going back to the old school? Seems ironic we’re fighting future tech with… the past. [KORKY] It's not ironic, Roger, it’s cyclical. It’s about leveraging the present without becoming beholden to its inherent vulnerabilities. Email lists, sure, but also direct community building. Discord servers, localized fan clubs, bespoke experiences, exclusive content delivered directly to your most ardent supporters. It's about cultivating relationships that transcend the ephemeral trends dictated by AI. Build your own garden, cultivate your own community. [SHANE] And that community… that’s where the value is. That’s where the money still flows, right? Because people will pay for authenticity. They’ll pay for a connection with a real human being, a real story. Even if an AI can make a thousand perfect songs… it can’t tell *your* story. [KORKY] Precisely, Shane. The authentic narrative, the unique personal journey—these are the remaining bastions of human artistic value. While an AI can synthesize emotions, it cannot *feel* them in a manner that resonates with the deep human need for shared experience. But this requires a significant shift in perspective for the artist. Less reliance on passive distribution, more on active engagement and direct value proposition. [ROGER] It's like… going back to the old touring model, right? You play the small towns, you meet the people, you sell the CDs out of the trunk of your car. You build it up one fan at a time. It’s just… now you’re doing it online, too. Maybe even more online than in person. [SHANE] Yeah, remember that time… back at the Monterey Pop Festival, 1967? The Airplane played, the Dead played, Hendrix set his guitar on fire… and there were these little booths, off to the side, where artists were trying to sell hand-printed manifestos, silk-screened posters… building direct connection. No gatekeepers. Just direct-to-fan, analogue style. [ROGER] Man, Monterey. What a lineup. Remember the stories about Ravi Shankar playing for three hours, just hypnotizing everyone? And then Pete Townshend smashing his guitar and being like, “Alright, next!” It was all about the live experience, the unique moment. And people showed up. They showed up for that. [KORKY] Fascinating historical tangent, gentlemen, but perhaps we can return to the imminent future. The point stands: the unique, live, human experience and the direct relationship with an audience will be the artist's strongest shields against algorithmic commodification. But it demands a strategic, proactive approach. Artists must become not just creators, but also community managers, digital strategists, and direct marketers. [SHANE] So the EPK, the electronic press kit, still matters, but it’s not just for labels anymore. It’s for booking agents who are looking for artists with built-in audiences. It’s for your fans, who want to feel like they’re getting inside access to your journey. [ROGER] And that means, artists have to get savvy about data collection, right? Not just looking at Spotify streams, but understanding *who* is listening, *where* they are, and *how* to reach them directly. Not just relying on platform analytics, but building their own databases. [KORKY] Exactly. The data you generate must be *your* data. Not Facebook’s, not TikTok’s, not Spotify’s. Because those platforms, while useful for exposure, ultimately control the spigot. And when AI enters the fray, it changes the economics of that spigot dramatically. You need to control your own water source. [SHANE] It’s a sobering thought, Korky. But also… a challenging one. A call to action for every artist out there. To lean into what makes them uniquely human, to build those relationships directly, and to never stop learning about the shifts happening under their feet. It’s more work, perhaps, but it’s also… more control. [ROGER] More control, less reliance on some exec in a glass tower making decisions based on spreadsheets. Sounds like a win to me, even if it’s a lot more hustle. Always has been hustle, though. N

    The Green Room S05E12 — Artist Development

  8. Sep 14

    The Green Room S05E11 — Independent Artists and

    https://musiciansadvocate.org This episode dives deep into the shifting landscape for independent artists, exploring how the increasing volume of content and the rise of AI-generated media are impacting authenticity and discoverability. The hosts and their guest discuss why traditional strategies for promotion are becoming insufficient in an "algorithmic deluge." • Learn why the humble EPK is no longer enough to stand out in a crowded, AI-assisted market. • Discover how the music industry is grappling with AI-generated artists and their implications for human creativity. • Understand why "owning your audience" and building direct connections is more critical than ever. • Explore new strategies for delivering value and fostering genuine community beyond standard social media platforms. Here is the full transcript: [SHANE] Welcome back to The Green Room, on Musicians Advocate Radio, musiciansadvocate.org. Always good to have you with us here, exploring the path for the independent artist, and those who aspire to… well, to simply make good music, and be heard. [ROGER] Or make *any* music, and be heard. The bar is getting lower for creation, but the noise floor for discovery is getting higher. It’s a paradox. [SHANE] Indeed. A paradox wrapped in a conundrum, Roger. You know, it reminds me of… what was that year… when the main stage at the Reading Festival in '79 had that massive power surge right as Peter Gabriel was about to drop into "Solsbury Hill"… and they had to delay for an hour because the entire stage lighting grid went dark? [ROGER] Oh, I remember that one. That wasn't just a surge, Shane. That was a generator meltdown. They had to haul in a backup from a nearby farm show, which was running off a tractor engine. The entire intro to "San Jacinto" was played to the rhythmic chugging of a John Deere. Pure chaos. [SHANE] Pure artistry, if you ask me. Made the experience… unique. And speaking of unique experiences, we have our friend, our esteemed colleague, Mr. Korky Tyson back with us. Korky, always a pleasure to have your… unique perspective. [KORKY] Gentlemen, always a delight to join you in this… digital salon. One might even say a necessary intervention, given the seismic shifts occurring beneath the very foundations of our industry. You discuss uniqueness, Shane, but the very concept is under siege. [ROGER] There he is. Always with the theatrical flair, Korky. What deep-seated societal collapse are you here to warn us about today? Is it the return of the mp3? [KORKY] Roger, please. The mp3 is a quaint relic, a mere footnote in the annals of format wars. We are facing something far more profound. We are, I contend, at the precipice of an authenticity crisis driven by… the algorithmic deluge. [SHANE] The algorithmic deluge. That sounds… appropriately dramatic. Tell us more, Korky. What new torment is the independent artist facing from the digital gods? [KORKY] Well, you both frequently discuss the importance of the Electronic Press Kit, the EPK, yes? How critical it is for artists to present themselves professionally, to stand out to agents, promoters, labels. That advice, while sound in principle, is rapidly becoming… insufficient. [ROGER] Insufficient? Korky, an EPK is still the bare minimum. You can’t get booked without one. You can’t get a decent review without one. Are you saying we should go back to sending physical CDs and glossy eight-by-tens through the mail? Because I’ve still got my old Jiffy bag supply from ’98. [KORKY] No, Roger, you misunderstand. The *form* of the EPK persists, but its *efficacy* is diminishing. The sheer volume of content being generated, much of it now AI-assisted, means that the traditional components of an EPK—your bio, your press photos, your music samples, even your testimonials—are increasingly indistinguishable from a mountain of other, algorithmically-optimized content. Imagine a million perfectly crafted bios, all hitting the right keywords. How do you cut through that? [SHANE] Ah… the signal-to-noise ratio. It’s always been an issue, but you’re suggesting the noise itself is becoming… intelligent. [KORKY] Precisely. Consider the burgeoning trend of AI-generated artist profiles, even AI-generated *artists*. I’m not just talking about deepfakes or virtual influencers; I mean fully autonomous creative entities being developed by studios, complete with backstories, entire discographies, and meticulously crafted social media personas, all designed to appeal to specific demographics. It’s a battle not just for attention, but for *authenticity*. My last consulting gig, I lost a deal to an AI-generated character, an entire narrative and sound profile, just before the WGA strike. They said it was… more pliable. Less demanding. [ROROGER] Pliable. Less demanding. That’s the dream, isn't it? For the industry, anyway. No ego, no rider, just pure content generation on demand. So, what’s an artist supposed to do? Develop an AI to compete with the AI? Outsource their emotions to an algorithm? [KORKY] Not necessarily. My point is that the *human element* becomes paradoxically more valuable, yet harder to convey. Your EPK needs to scream "human" in a world saturated with simulated humanity. It's no longer enough to be good; you have to be *unmistakably* you. And that means rethinking how you leverage your social reach, how you "own your audience." [SHANE] Owning your audience… that’s a phrase we’ve championed for years. Moving beyond just follower counts, getting direct contact info, building genuine community. Is that becoming harder too, Korky? Or more crucial? [KORKY] More crucial, Shane, and simultaneously more elusive through traditional means. The platforms, the social media giants, they are *not* your friends. They are not designed to foster your direct connection; they are designed to intermediate it, to monetize *their* access to *your* audience. Their algorithms are constantly shifting, favoring paid promotion, ephemeral content, or increasingly, content that aligns with their corporate partners’ agendas. Organic reach is a diminishing commodity. [ROGER] So, the old advice of "build a great website, get an email list, be active on social"… that’s now what, just a starting point for an existential crisis? [KORKY] It’s a necessary foundation, Roger, but it must be built upon with a hyper-focus on *direct, unmediated connection*. Think about how you’re delivering value *outside* the feed. Are you offering exclusive content via email? Are you building a Discord server that's truly engaged, not just a broadcast channel? Are you cultivating micro-communities around specific interests or themes related to your music? The goal isn't just to be seen; it's to be *chosen*, actively and repeatedly. [SHANE] Chosen. That's a powerful distinction. It shifts the burden from the algorithm to the artist's ingenuity. It means being more than just a musician… you're a community manager, a content strategist, an experience curator. [ROGER] And a therapist, probably. With all the constant hustling involved. So, let’s get practical here, Korky. What’s one tangible thing an artist can do to make their EPK scream "human" and build this direct connection in a meaningful way? Besides, you know, not using AI to write their bio, which seems like a no-brainer. [KORKY] Excellent question, Roger, and one that cuts to the core. Beyond the obvious, which yes, is to ensure your voice is authentically *yours* in all written materials—don't let an algorithm polish out your quirks—I would say: prioritize video. And not just any video. Short-form, intimate, unscripted glimpses into your creative process, your personality, your struggles, your triumphs. These need not be high-production. They need to be *real*. [SHANE] Real. So, not just the polished music video, but the messy bits too. The outtakes. The false starts. The "I just wrote this riff, what do you think?" moments. [KORKY] Exactly, Shane. The imperfections become the distinguishing characteristic. And crucially, find ways to distribute these directly. Embed them in your email newsletters. Offer them as exclusive perks to patrons. Create a dedicated section on your own website, not just linking out to YouTube or TikTok. The goal is to make people feel like they’re getting a peek behind the velvet rope, not just another piece of feed content. It's about scarcity of genuine interaction in an age of infinite, artificial content. [ROGER] Scarcity. That’s an interesting angle. Most people are just trying to get *more* out there. You’re saying less, but better directed? Like when bands used to press limited run vinyl for fans who showed up to specific gigs. Same principle, just digital. [KORKY] The principle is indeed analogous, Roger. It’s about creating value through perceived exclusivity and direct connection, bypassing the gatekeepers. And remember, the platforms may prioritize their own monetization, but they still thrive on user engagement. If you can cultivate a highly engaged, loyal audience *off* their main feeds, you then have leverage to direct them *back* to your platform, your store, your direct communication channels. [SHANE] Leverage. That’s the word. And it’s a constant battle for leverage for the artist. It always has been. So, the takeaway here is… don't just put your EPK out there and hope. Make it sing *you*. And then, build bridges directly to your audience, ensuring those bridges are robust enough to bypass any algorithmic dams the platforms decide to erect. [ROGER] And make sure your guitar sound is unique enough that an AI can't just synthesize it from a prompt. Or that you're using some obscure vintage amp Korky probably doesn't even know about, so they can't train on it. Like the Ampeg B-15 Portaflex from the early 60s, a bass amp often used for guitar in the studio for that warm, round tone. Nobo

    The Green Room S05E11 — Independent Artists and
See All (18)

About

The professional platform for independent musicians. Build your profile, get discovered, connect with venues and talent buyers. Free to join.

Information

More From Tom's Audio Podcasts