Democratic Reporter Podcast

Democratic Reporter

A grassroots progressive news platform funded by our audience and no one else. No billionaires, no investors, no compromises. PERIOD. www.democraticreporter.com

  1. 2d ago

    Ken Paxton Spent Six Hours Under Oath. A Judge Who Donated To The Paxtons Sealed It

    On Wednesday, James Talarico’s campaign asked a Collin County court to unseal two depositions Ken Paxton gave under oath. These six hours of testimony have never been made public. Paxton, the Texas attorney general and Republican nominee for U.S. Senate, gave these depositions in 2019 and 2022 as part of a long-running securities fraud lawsuit involving an energy company he once represented. The motion says Texas law does not require the transcripts to stay hidden and that voters should be able to read them before the November election. Talarico’s attorneys also asked the court for a quick hearing, noting how close the Senate race is. The lawsuit that put Paxton under oath The case began when Charles Loper III, a close friend of Paxton, sued Byron Cook, a former state legislator who served with Paxton in the Texas House. Loper and his father said Cook cheated them out of hundreds of thousands of dollars, which Cook denied in court. The lawsuit focused on Unity Resources, a Texas energy company, and Paxton was deeply involved. He had been the company’s lawyer, served on its board, and was an investor. Paxton was not a defendant, but as Unity’s former attorney, he was deposed twice. Neither transcript has been released. The lawsuit was eventually settled. The Wall Street Journal reviewed the first deposition and reported in April that Paxton may have broken attorney-client privilege by sharing confidential information about Unity with Mitch Little, a state representative and attorney for Loper. Legal ethics experts told the Journal that giving a former client’s communications to someone suing that client violates privilege. The Journal also said Paxton answered ‘I don’t recall’ about 90 times during the first deposition. At the time, Paxton campaign spokesperson Nick Maddux called the Journal’s reporting “blatant lies” and accused the paper of violating a court order. The judge who kept it sealed Cynthia Wheless, the Collin County district judge on the case, sealed both depositions. She and her husband have donated to the Paxtons’ campaigns over the years, including a $1,000 donation from Cynthia Wheless to Angela Paxton in 2018, according to Texas campaign finance records. Together, they have given about $1,825 to Ken and Angela Paxton’s campaigns since 2014. Her husband, Ray Wheless, is also a judge. In July 2025, he ordered the Paxtons’ divorce records sealed. The Paxtons later agreed to unseal those records after news organizations challenged the order in court. Those are not accusations. They are public records. Paxton’s response: attack Talarico, ignore the depositions Paxton’s campaign did not comment on the depositions. In a statement to USA TODAY, spokeswoman Madison Cercy called the motion “a desperate attempt to hide his own extremism” and criticized Talarico’s voting record in the Legislature, accusing him of supporting tax increases. That was the full response. The statement did not mention Unity Resources, the sealed transcripts, or why six hours of sworn testimony should remain hidden from the voters Paxton wants to represent in Washington. A candidate who keeps surviving Paxton has faced similar situations before. The Republican-led Texas House impeached him in 2023 on charges including bribery, but the GOP-controlled state Senate acquitted him on all 16 articles that September. In July 2025, his wife, state Sen. Angela Paxton, said she had filed to end their 38-year marriage on what she called “biblical grounds.” He beat Sen. John Cornyn for the Republican nomination in May. Cornyn and his allies warned throughout the primary that Paxton would be vulnerable in a general election, even in a state Trump carried by roughly 14 points in 2024. Paxton has been trailing Talarico in most public polling since he won the nomination, and forecasters rate the race a toss-up. The stakes reach well beyond Texas. Control of the Senate for the final two years of Trump’s term could come down to this seat. What happens next Talarico’s campaign wants a hearing scheduled soon and is asking the court to rule that there is no legal reason to keep the transcripts secret. If the court agrees, Texans will be able to read what Paxton said under oath about a fraud case involving his friend, his former client, and his own money before they vote. If not, voters will have to choose a senator while six hours of his sworn testimony remain sealed. If you can afford to chip in less than $5/month as an annual supporter you can help us increase our coverage of Trump’s illegal and immortal activities and expose his administration. If you don’t have the means to contribute right now, please consider a free subscription so we can reach as many people as possible with our grassroot campaign! We’d love to continue this week with your support! This Substack is reader-supported. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Democratic Reporter covers the actions of powerful people when they think no one is watching. Ken Paxton is asking Texans for a Senate seat that will help shape the last two years of Donald Trump’s term, even as his own sworn testimony remains sealed. If you think voters should see the full story before voting, subscribe to Democratic Reporter and share this story with someone in Texas. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.democraticreporter.com/subscribe

  2. 4d ago

    Donald Trump’s New 50% Auto And Metal Tariffs Will Hurt American Companies As Canada Moves On

    Donald Trump started the week with a threat. On Monday morning, he posted on Truth Social that tariffs on all Canadian cars, trucks, auto parts, and steel would go up to 50% on January 1, 2027. He accused Canada of “ripping off the United States of America for years” and said, “Canada will be treated like a State no longer!” He ended with a line that will likely be repeated for months: “WE DON’T NEED CANADA, THEY NEED US!” The post arrived three days after trade talks between Washington and Ottawa collapsed and two days after the administration began collecting 50% tariffs on roughly $20 billion in Canadian goods, from dairy and wine to cement and hockey sticks. Reuters reported that the new threat would double the tariff on Canadian vehicles from the current 25% and would tax Canadian auto parts, which have so far escaped a levy, for the first time. The White House did not respond to the wire service’s request for details, and the post did not say which law the president intends to use. Trump’s Truth Social Post Numbers Are Highly Inaccurate Trump wrote that Canada does 95% of its business with the United States. Canada’s own government data puts the American share of Canadian merchandise exports at 71.7% for 2025, the lowest share since the early 1980s and down from 75.9% a year earlier. On the import side, the share of Canadian purchases coming from the United States fell from 62.3% to 58.8% over the same year. Neither figure is anywhere near 95%, and both are moving in the wrong direction for a president who insists Canada cannot survive without American customers. The $60 billion deficit figure is also stale. That number is the goods deficit from 2024, and it leaves out services entirely. Bureau of Economic Analysis data compiled by USAFacts shows the United States imported $453.6 billion in goods and services from Canada in 2025 and exported $426.3 billion, leaving a gap of roughly $27 billion once services are counted, down from $39.4 billion the year before. Most of that gap comes from oil. RSM chief economist Joseph Brusuelas found that in 2024, the U.S. had a $63 billion goods deficit with Canada, but if Canadian crude oil is excluded, the U.S. actually had a surplus of over $50 billion. This is because many American refineries are set up to use the heavy crude that Canada sells at a discount. Statistics Canada said Canada exported $176.2 billion in energy products in 2024, most of it to the U.S. The new tariffs target cars and steel, not the energy trade that causes the deficit. The farm complaint at the top of Trump’s post has the same problem. Canada’s headline dairy tariffs, the ones that run well above 200%, apply only to shipments above the quotas negotiated in Trump’s own USMCA, and FactCheck.org found that American dairy has never paid those rates because exports have never come close to filling the quota. Within the quota, American dairy enters Canada tariff-free. Canada is the second-largest export market for American dairy at about $1.1 billion in 2024, up from roughly $625 million a decade earlier, and the second-largest market for American agriculture overall at $28.4 billion. Canada Has Spent Trump’s Trade War Building An Exit While Trump claimed Canada had no other options, Canada found new markets. Global Affairs Canada said Canadian goods exports to the U.S. dropped 5.8% in 2025, but this was almost completely balanced by a 17.2% increase in exports to other countries, reaching a record high. The share of Canadian exports going outside the U.S. is now the highest in over forty years. For example, gold shipments to the United Kingdom rose 76%, worth about $17 billion, as higher gold prices helped offset lower manufacturing and auto sales to the U.S. Total goods trade between the two countries has now fallen for three consecutive years, and Canada’s merchandise surplus with the United States shrank from $101.3 billion to $81.6 billion in Canadian dollars last year. Prime Minister Mark Carney summed up where that leaves his country on Saturday: “We are stronger now than when the United States started this trade war.” The Tariffs Will Cause Financial Headaches For American Automakers Trump’s post says “Build in the U.S., and there are ZERO TARIFFS,” as if the vehicles crossing the border belonged to some foreign rival. A large share of them belong to General Motors, Ford, and Stellantis, the Detroit Three, which have spent the past two years putting money into Ontario. General Motors builds the Chevrolet Silverado in Oshawa, Ontario, at the only plant in North America that assembles the light-duty and heavy-duty versions on the same line. The plant built 135,800 pickups last year for about 11% of all Canadian vehicle production, and in February GM put another $63 million into its stamping operations to prepare for the next generation of gas-powered full-size trucks, bringing its investment in Oshawa to $1.5 billion since 2020. The Silverado is the second best selling vehicle in the United States, and the V8 engines for GM’s full-size trucks come out of its St. Catharines plant down the highway. Ford spent this year bringing its Oakville Assembly Complex back to life after a retooling that cost more than $1.8 billion and kept the plant dark for two years. The rebuilt plant assembles F-Series Super Duty pickups at a rate of up to 100,000 a year, with roughly 1,800 Canadian jobs on the line and about 150 more at the Windsor Engine Complex, which builds the V8s that go into them. Ford chief executive Jim Farley said when the plan was announced that the company’s Kentucky and Ohio truck plants were “running flat out” and still could not meet demand, which is why the overflow went to Ontario. Those trucks are built for American buyers, and under Trump’s plan every one of them would carry a 50% tariff when it crosses the border. Stellantis builds the Chrysler Pacifica, the Chrysler Voyager, and the Dodge Charger at its Windsor Assembly Plant, directly across the river from Detroit. In February, the company restarted a third shift there for the first time since 2020 and brought roughly 1,700 new workers onto the line to push employment at the plant to nearly 6,000. The Windsor-built 2026 Charger was named North American Car of the Year in January, and Stellantis says it has invested $7.9 billion in Canada since 2022. None of this is hypothetical. The 25% tariff already in place, which applies to the non-American content of vehicles assembled in Canada, has been pulling production south for a year. The Globe and Mail reported that GM boosted Silverado output in Fort Wayne, Indiana, in 2025 even as it planned layoffs in Oshawa, and about 500 Oshawa workers lost their jobs in February when the plant dropped to two shifts. Stellantis moved the next-generation Jeep Compass from its idled Brampton plant to Illinois as part of a $13 billion American investment, and Brampton has now sat closed for more than two years. Trump’s “build in the U.S.” demand is not an invitation. For workers in Oshawa and Brampton, it describes what has already happened to them. The Parts Problem Is Worse Than The Truck Problem The vehicles are only half of it. Trump’s post also promises 50% tariffs on automotive parts, and parts are where the North American industry is most tightly bound together. Flavio Volpe, president of Canada’s Automotive Parts Manufacturers’ Association, told Reuters that American assembly plants would pay the cost of a parts tariff and warned, “Without those specific parts, auto assembly throughout the US would halt.” Cox Automotive analyst Erin Keating said the damage from an unworkable tariff would spread far beyond Canadian plants, because vehicles assembled in Canada depend heavily on parts from American suppliers that employ more than half a million people in the United States. The trade runs the other way too. Canadians bought about 663,000 vehicles built at American assembly plants last year, according to research firm Mobility Global, and spent more than three times as much as American buyers on heavy trucks, buses, and special-purpose vehicles. Patrick Anderson, chief executive of the Michigan-based Anderson Economic Group, had shrugged off Trump’s earlier Canada tariffs on sweaters, honey, and hockey sticks as an annoyance. He did not shrug off this one. He told CNN the auto threat is the real trade war and called it “a body blow to the auto industry.” Unifor, which represents Canadian autoworkers, called the announcement an intimidation tactic and said the instability hurts workers on both sides of the border. The United Auto Workers, which has backed most of Trump’s tariffs, did not respond to requests for comment. Senator Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota said the tariffs have already driven up costs and created chaos, and that Canada’s dollar-for-dollar retaliation will land on her state. What Donald Trump’s Truth Social Post Leaves Out Trump’s post promises to raise the steel tariff to 50%, but the steel tariff has already been at 50% for more than a year, and Reuters noted it was not clear what he meant. The legal footing is murkier still. The Supreme Court struck down the emergency powers law behind Trump’s first wave of tariffs on Canada earlier this year. The $20 billion in Canadian goods hit on Saturday were tariffed instead under Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930, a Depression era provision never before used to impose tariffs by any president, and one that caps duties at exactly the 50% the administration has already reached. Monday’s post named no authority at all for the auto and steel increase. The auto executives who spoke to Reuters were skeptical for a different reason. They pointed out that Trump has announced enormous tariffs before that never materialized, that a 50% auto tariff would guarantee massive Canadian retaliation, and that January 1 falls comfortably after the November

  3. 5d ago

    A Bribery Empire, a $5 Million Check, And a Private Jet: The Beef Deal Trump Hopes You Won't Trace

    On Friday, Donald Trump said the United States will let in up to 300,000 metric tons of ground beef over the next 90 days without the usual tariffs, and claimed it will sell for 25% less than current prices. When reporters asked, he would not say which countries are involved. A White House official said an executive order will be signed in the next two weeks, but the administration has not explained which suppliers made the pricing promise or how the border discount will reach shoppers. The U.S. Cattlemen’s Association pointed out that the 90-day period runs through November, which is when the midterm elections take place. When asked about criticism, Trump told reporters, “That’s what the voters want.” Ranchers Definitely Didn’t Want This Live cattle futures fell $3 to $4 per hundredweight when the post went up, with feeders down as much as $6, before recovering most of the losses by the close of trading that afternoon. The National Cattlemen’s Beef Association said it was disappointed and described the plan as “government-subsidized, below-market beef” that will not rebuild the American herd. The sharpest criticism came from Republicans. Senator Tim Sheehy of Montana wrote that he had advised Trump against this for a year, that ranchers have been struggling against the packer monopoly for decades, and that this will harm them, “most of whom are MAGA Republicans.” Chuck Grassley tied his concern to the Tyson plant closure in Illinois, writing that “USA cattlemen should always be put 1st thru America 1st policies.” Deb Fischer, a cattle rancher herself in Nebraska, said she was “extremely disappointed” by the decision. Thomas Massie blasted the deal on X, calling it a “slap in the face to American cattlemen & consumers.” Marjorie Taylor Greene, now out of Congress, posted the president’s own announcement and declared it “American beef LAST and foreign beef FIRST.” The top cattle industry lobbyist in Washington told ABC News that many producers are frustrated and feel like “this isn’t what they voted for.” This group gave 95% of its political donations to Republicans in the 2024 cycle. The company that did ask for it Last fall, Wesley Batista, one of the billionaire brothers who run JBS, argued that American production cannot meet demand, saying “the U.S. needs to import more and more.” Farm Action, the farm advocacy group, said in May that JBS is most likely to benefit from expanded imports, and that flooding a consolidated market with imports strengthens multinational packers while pressuring independent ranchers. JBS had reason to want relief. Eleven days before Friday’s post, the company reported a $102 million net loss for the quarter even as revenue hit a record, because live cattle prices kept outpacing beef cutout values in its North American business. It still paid shareholders a $1 billion dividend that quarter. The company announced in June it was closing its Souderton, Pennsylvania beef plant as part of a restructuring, and it told analysts on its earnings call that beef arriving under a lower tariff would be “pretty complementary” to what it produces here. It also named Wesley Batista Filho as its next global chief executive, returning the family to top leadership for the first time in about eight years. Who Are The Batistas In May 2017, the brothers entered plea bargains after admitting bribery of more than 1,800 politicians. They testified to spending 600 million reais on payments to nearly 1,900 politicians, and their holding company agreed to a record $3.2 billion fine payable over 25 years. The former head of Brazil’s securities regulator cited testimony putting the count at exactly 1,829 politicians. The testimony reached the presidency itself, with executives accusing the sitting president of taking nearly $5 million and alleging two former presidents received $80 million in offshore accounts. Joesley Batista had secretly taped a conversation with President Temer that appeared to involve hush money. By late 2017, authorities had arrested both brothers in connected cases, but they returned to the JBS board in 2024. The corruption built the American business. According to the SEC, the Batistas paid bribes to secure $2 billion in development bank financing that facilitated the acquisition of Pilgrim’s Pride. In 2020, the holding company pleaded guilty in a Brooklyn courtroom to foreign bribery charges and agreed to a $256 million fine. In February 2025, the Trump administration paused enforcement of that same statute nationwide. The Check, The Listing, And The Private Jet In January 2025, JBS subsidiary Pilgrim’s Pride gave $5 million to the inaugural committee, the largest single disclosed donation, which was more than Apple’s CEO plus Amazon, Meta, and Google combined. SEC approval of the New York Stock Exchange listing JBS had chased for close to a decade came just two days after the donation surfaced in federal filings. Elizabeth Warren, pointing to a decade of trying and failing to go public, said, “That sounds pretty fishy to me.” JBS said the donation was entirely unrelated to the multiyear listing process, and Pilgrim’s said it has a “long bipartisan history of participating in the civic process.” The relationship grew closer after that. In July 2025, the White House put 50% tariffs on Brazil. Joesley Batista then got a private meeting with Trump and, according to someone familiar with the conversation, told him the tariffs were making beef too expensive for Americans. Three weeks later, Trump praised Lula at the United Nations, saying “we had excellent chemistry.” On November 7, 2025, the White House announced it was cracking down on what it called “foreign-owned meat packing cartels,” naming JBS first among the Big Four and directing the Justice Department to investigate the beef supply chain. Thirteen days later, Trump retroactively removed the 40% tariff on Brazilian beef, with refunds for importers. In May 2026, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins warned about packer concentration, saying four companies control roughly 85% of cattle processing and that the landscape opens the door to exerting control over ranchers. The same day, the Justice Department confirmed its probe had reviewed more than 3 million documents. Two days later, Reuters reported that Joesley Batista played a key role in arranging a Trump-Lula meeting in Washington, with a family jet flying in from Colorado. Within days, Trump reportedly prepared beef tariff cuts before retreating from an anticipated executive order after pushback from Congress and ranch groups. In July, he exempted beef from new 25% tariffs on Brazilian goods, with R-CALF’s Bill Bullard predicting packers would benefit while retail prices held. What We Know About Friday’s Beef Announcement Trump will not name the countries, so here is the public record. The relief covers imported lean beef trimmings used to produce ground beef. Brazil is the world’s largest beef exporter and a major supplier of lean manufacturing beef used in U.S. processing. Brazil exhausted its low-tariff quota in just 17 days in 2025, and Brazilian industry officials say the 2026 quota was fully used in the first quarter of this year. Whether any of this shows up on your grocery bill is another question. Ground beef hit $6.89 a pound in July, up 57% from five years ago, and experts said the earlier move quadrupling the low-tariff quota for Argentine beef involved too small a share of supply to move prices. Farm Action argues the real driver is consolidation, with ranchers now getting less than 30 cents of every retail beef dollar. Meanwhile, the squeeze Secretary Rollins described is playing out in real time. Tyson closed its Joslin, Illinois plant with zero notice on August 13, removing 3,000 head of daily capacity and leaving feeders hauling cattle 160 to 400 miles, with experts warning bids could fall $200 to $300 a head. Roughly 2,500 union workers lost their jobs, and employees learned of the closure from letters handed out in the plant cafeteria. Here’s what has happened: A foreign company whose owners admitted to bribing more than 1,800 politicians. A guilty plea in a U.S. courtroom. The largest check to the inauguration. A stock listing approved two days after that check became public. A private jet used for presidential diplomacy. An Agriculture Secretary warning on camera about packer control. A White House that promised a cartel crackdown in November and then cut the cartel’s tariffs that same month. And a president who, ten weeks before the midterms, will not say which country the beef is coming from. You do not have to believe there was a quid pro quo. Just look at the timeline. If you can afford to chip in less than $5/month as an annual supporter you can help us increase our coverage of Trump’s illegal and immortal activities and expose his administration. If you don’t have the means to contribute right now, please consider a free subscription so we can reach as many people as possible with our grassroot campaign! We’d love to continue this week with your support! This Substack is reader-supported. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Democratic Reporter tracks the money so the Trump administration cannot give out favors like this without scrutiny. If you want journalism that holds power accountable and connects the dots, subscribe and share this story with someone who still thinks the deal was just about hamburger prices. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.democraticreporter.com/subscribe

  4. Aug 17

    Trump Cuts Military Drills With South Korea To Please Kim Jong Un, Then Threatens To Bomb Oman

    President Donald Trump ordered the Pentagon on Sunday to reduce American participation in the drills that the United States runs every summer with South Korea, delivering the directive by social media post less than a day before the 11-day exercise was scheduled to begin. He gave three reasons: the cost, South Korea’s refusal to help with the American war against Iran, and his personal relationship with the man who runs the world’s most repressive state. “Based on my very good relationship with Kim Jong Un, of North Korea, I am not happy with the fact that the United States has, long ago, agreed to participate in Joint Military Exercises with South Korea,” Trump wrote. He argued that the exercises “send a signal that is totally inappropriate and hostile,” and described North Korea as respectful toward the United States for as long as he has been in office. Trump’s post came a day after he shared a 2019 photo of himself with Kim at the inter-Korean border. He wrote, “Despite the unfriendly look on this particular picture, there are many where we’re smiling, Kim Jong Un and I get along GREAT!” In the same series of posts, he also shared shared a Trump 2028 image and several AI-generated pictures showing himself next to George Washington. By Monday morning, Trump had shifted his focus to another ally. During a phone call with Fox News, he threatened to bomb Oman if it got in the way of his approach to the Strait of Hormuz, using strong language to make his point. Oman has been working with Iran on a plan to reopen the waterway. What the Order Actually Does Ulchi Freedom Shield is one of two major annual exercises held by the U.S. and South Korean militaries. This year, it was set for August 17 to August 27, with about 18,000 South Korean troops training with American forces on precision targeting, river crossings, and defenses against drones, GPS jamming, and cyberattacks. Trump’s order did not affect the 28,500 American troops permanently based in South Korea. Instead, it changed the training, which is key to making sure both militaries can work together in combat. Seoul’s defense ministry said the drills started Monday as planned, but officials in both countries have not explained what the reduced exercises will actually involve. Trump’s mention of Iran was almost an afterthought. He said he asked South Korean President Lee Jae Myung if South Korea wanted to join U.S. efforts against Tehran, but Lee declined. According to Lee’s office, South Korea took part in international ceasefire talks and is still discussing military contributions with Washington. The Iran War Is Now a Loyalty Test The decision about South Korea is not a one-time outburst. It is the latest example of Trump punishing allies who refuse to join his wars, a pattern that has weakened the alliance system he inherited compared to a year ago. Trump has already criticized the other allies by name. He told reporters that Japan, Australia, South Korea, and NATO did not help him, and he called NATO a paper tiger after its members closed airspace and bases to U.S. forces. He also connected these disputes to his attempt to buy Greenland. South Korea has faced repeated setbacks over the past year, often at a cost. Seoul promised hundreds of billions of dollars in U.S. investment to ease threatened tariffs, which Trump set at 15% on Korean goods. Later, federal agents detained hundreds of Korean workers at a Hyundai battery plant in Georgia, showing them in handcuffs on camera in the largest single-site immigration operation in Homeland Security history. Now, the joint defense of the peninsula is also at risk. Criticism in Washington came quickly. Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona, a retired Navy combat pilot, called the decision shortsighted and a mistake. Regional analysts told reporters that Trump’s characterization of North Korea as unthreatening is alarming to allies watching Pyongyang steadily improve its missile and nuclear capabilities while gaining Russia as a patron. Seoul Is Left Managing the Damage South Korea’s presidential office responded by stressing ongoing cooperation with Washington and expressing hope that the positive relationship between Trump and Kim could lead to real talks. Behind these diplomatic statements, the government has asked for discussions with Washington to clarify what the reduced drills will mean in practice. Criticism within South Korea has been more direct. A conservative opposition lawmaker accused Trump of weakening defense by putting his relationship with Kim ahead of the peninsula’s security. Some analysts in Seoul see the move as an incentive to bring Kim back to negotiations before a possible diplomatic opportunity this fall. Kim Gave Up Nothing The idea that North Korea is not a threat does not hold up against recent events. Pyongyang launched ballistic missiles twice this month, on August 5 and August 12, violating United Nations resolutions. In June, Kim said his country had doubled its weapons-grade fissile material production over fire years, and outside estimates now put the arsenal at about 60 warheads, with enough material for many more. Pyongyang has made it clear that its nuclear weapons are not up for negotiation. Last month, Kim Yo Jong, Kim’s sister and a key foreign policy figure, called nuclear weapons the regime’s ultimate shield and said North Korea’s nuclear status is final and irreversible. North Korean troops are still fighting for Russia in Ukraine, making the regime less reliant on U.S. sanctions relief than ever before. This is the trade Trump made. He gave up part of allied military readiness to a government that has given nothing in return except not insulting him personally. This Is Not New Behavior Anyone surprised by Sunday’s post has not been following the past eight years. In 2018, after the Singapore summit, Trump suspended the same exercise, calling it provocative and expensive, using almost the same words as this weekend. The talks meant to justify that move fell apart at the Hanoi summit the next year. Trump’s admiration was always clear. At a 2018 rally, he said he and Kim “fell in love” after Kim sent him what he called beautiful letters. Years later, Trump still named authoritarian leaders as his best counterparts among world leaders. On the campaign trail, he grouped Putin, Xi, and Orbán together as top-performing leaders. Trump does not admire Kim’s policies, but his hold on power. Kim took control in his twenties and has never faced voters, courts, or a free press. Human rights groups and the United Nations have reported atrocities under Kim, including prison camps, public executions, and mass starvation. Trump has never publicly criticized any of this. He calls Kim smart, tough, and in total control, and means these as compliments. This instinct now shapes American foreign policy. Researchers who study democratic decline say it encourages autocrats around the world, who see the U.S. rewarding strongmen and leaving behind allies that hold elections. The same weekend Trump praised a communist dictator, he also shared Fox News segments attacking Democrats as communists and posted pictures of himself wearing a 2028 campaign hat. What It Costs Allies pay attention to a president’s actions, even when the spotlight is elsewhere. Japan, Taiwan, and NATO members saw the U.S. president cancel allied training with only 24 hours’ notice to avoid upsetting a nuclear-armed rival, then threaten to bomb a Gulf partner over a shipping disagreement. Deterrence on the Korean Peninsula depends on one belief: the United States will fight alongside South Korea. Trump has now shown the world that this commitment can change, and that the decision is made on his terms, often influenced by who has flattered him most recently. Kim Jong Un has waited for years for a U.S. president to stop these exercises. He did not have to give up a single warhead to get one to start doing it for nothing. If you can afford to chip in less than $7/month as an annual supporter you can help us increase our coverage of Trump’s illegal and immortal activities and expose his administration. If you don’t have the means to contribute right now, please consider a free subscription so we can reach as many people as possible with our grassroot campaign! We’d love to continue this week off with your support! Democratic Reporter monitors what this administration does when it thinks no one is watching. Share this with someone who should see it, and help us hold these leaders accountable. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.democraticreporter.com/subscribe

  5. Aug 16

    Todd Blanche Just Explained Why Trump’s January 6th Pardons Were Not Wrong, And It's A Very Dumb Argument

    Todd Blanche has only been the confirmed attorney general for about a week, but he has already shown how justice works under Donald Trump. In his first Sunday show interview with Kristen Welker since taking the job, Blanche was asked directly about the January 6th pardons and gave an answer that should concern anyone who cares about law and order. Welker pointed out that police officers at the Capitol were beaten with baseball bats and flagpoles, and asked if it was wrong to pardon those who attacked them, especially since Blanche had promised to protect law enforcement. Blanche replied that every attorney general makes that promise, including himself, and said he would not say Trump did anything wrong. When asked if this contradicted his own vow, he said absolutely not, repeating it twice. The difference Blanche described is the main issue. Blanche said there is a difference between promising to prosecute people who commit crimes and objecting when the president later erases their convictions. He described the pardon as the president using a constitutional power, and said the attorney general should not call it a mistake. At first, this sounds like a technical detail. But in practice, it means the Justice Department can charge people, hold press conferences, and get convictions, but the president decides if anyone actually serves a sentence. Trump has shown he will use pardons to protect his supporters. In this system, prosecution is just for show, and the pardon is what really matters. What the pardons actually erased About 1,500 people were charged for the Capitol attack, and over a thousand had already been convicted and sentenced when Trump signed a blanket clemency order on his first day back in office. Senator Chris Coons noted during Blanche’s confirmation hearing that by 5 p.m. on January 20th, all of them had been pardoned or had their sentences reduced, and he brought this up directly with Blanche. Several hundred of those charged were accused of assaulting police officers, and hundreds more were charged with obstructing or interfering with them. More than 140 officers were hurt that day, including Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick. His family joined House Democrats in condemning the clemency soon after Trump signed it. Blanche has Blanche was also involved in the financial aftermath. The administration proposed a fund of about $1.8 billion for people who said the federal government had wrongly prosecuted them, including January 6th defendants. Blanche told Welker there will be no such fund and no plan to bring it back, repeating a promise he made under oath in July that should be remembered. What stands out about Blanche’s answer on Sunday is that he had already admitted this point when he needed Senate votes. At his July hearing, he said those who assaulted police at the Capitol deserved prosecution and called the officers crime victims, but he still would not criticize Trump for erasing their convictions. Coons also challenged Blanche with his own comments from the Conservative Political Action Conference, where Blanche called the pardons an accomplishment instead of just accepting them. It’s a difficult position to maintain, and his interview with Welker suggests he is no longer trying to do so. The contradiction became even clearer two days before the interview aired. At a Trump rally in Long Island, where he endorsed a Republican candidate, Blanche promised that anyone who harms a federal law enforcement officer will be prosecuted fully. Former Capitol Police officer Aquilino Gonell responded by posting photos of his injuries and noting that the president Blanche works for has pardoned the men who caused them. The lawyer who never really stopped working for Trump None of this is surprising if you know Blanche’s background. He was Trump’s personal criminal defense lawyer during the New York hush money trial, which ended in a conviction on 34 felony counts. At his 2025 hearing to become deputy attorney general, he told Senator Adam Schiff that he still had an attorney-client relationship with Trump. After serving as the department’s second-in-command, Blanche was given the acting librarian of Congress job, though some have questioned whether this appointment was legal. He also led a nine-hour interview with Ghislaine Maxwell over two days in Florida. Some former federal prosecutors said this might have been for show, considering his history with the president. It later came out that Blanche and Maxwell’s lawyer are longtime friends who have appeared together on a legal podcast. When Trump fired Pam Bondi in April after reports that she was not acting quickly enough against his political opponents, Blanche became acting attorney general and told reporters he enjoyed working for the president. While he was in charge, the department brought charges against James Comey and Letitia James, but a federal judge dismissed them completely, saying the prosecutor had no legal authority to bring the cases. Senate Judiciary Democrats had already asked the inspector general to look into whether Blanche’s earlier testimony about the Eric Adams case was truthful. Still, the Senate confirmed him on August 8th by a 50 to 49 vote, with only Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski voting against their party. We Deserve Better From The U.S. Attorney General If the attorney general cannot say that beating a police officer with a flagpole deserves punishment, it shows exactly where accountability ends in this administration. It ends wherever Donald Trump chooses. Blanche also told Welker he would listen to the president’s views on who should be prosecuted, and said Trump has never asked him to do anything unethical or illegal. In the same interview, he suggested the department might take its dispute over state voter rolls to the Supreme Court, which is another issue. When you consider these statements along with his defense of the pardons, it becomes clear that in this Justice Department, the president’s preference matters more than the evidence. If you can afford to chip in less than $7/month as an annual supporter you can help us increase our coverage of Trump’s illegal and immortal activities and expose his administration. If you don’t have the means to contribute right now, please consider a free subscription so we can reach as many people as possible with our grassroot campaign! We’d love to continue this week off with your support! This Substack is reader-supported. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. The country deserves an attorney general who serves the public, not just the president. Democratic Reporter will continue to track every decision Blanche makes at the Justice Department, because this administration is hoping people stop paying attention. Subscribe and help us hold them accountable. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.democraticreporter.com/subscribe

  6. Aug 14

    Trump Begs Supreme Court To Push His Vanity White House Ballroom Project Forward

    President Donald Trump has filed an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court, asking for permission to finish building the ballroom and bunker complex he started at the White House. This request comes after the East Wing was already demolished and after two lower courts ruled he never had the authority to begin the project. The order of events is important. Demolition happened first. Now, the courts are deciding if it was legal, even though the work is already done and the area is cleared for a project that has been blocked twice. What Trump Wants to Build The plan has two parts, which lower courts have considered separately. Trump wants to build a fortified bunker under the White House, describing it as a military complex for national defense, not just personal use. Above it, he plans to add a ballroom of about nine thousand square feet. This way of presenting the project is intentional. By including the ballroom as part of a security installation, Trump’s legal team gains an argument they would not have otherwise. Courts are more likely to support a president on issues of personal safety than on interior design choices. The Courts Have Not Been Persuaded U.S. District Judge Richard Leon stopped the project, saying the administration did not follow the required steps before changing a federally protected building. Trump appealed, but last Friday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit agreed with Judge Leon’s decision. The appellate judges wrote plainly that every occupant of the White House is a temporary tenant rather than an owner of the Executive Residence, and that no constitutional provision hands the president authority over that property. They added that Congress must decide whether to build a massive ballroom. The judges delayed enforcing their decision for two weeks, giving the administration time to ask the Supreme Court to review the case. Trump took advantage of this delay. The Argument Before the Supreme Court In the emergency filing, Solicitor General D. John Sauer argued that if the injunction is allowed, one district judge would become the only person deciding what construction is truly needed to protect the president, his family, staff, and visiting foreign leaders. Stripped of the legal packaging, this is an argument that judicial review of White House construction is itself a danger. It asks the Supreme Court to treat any court-ordered limit on presidential building projects as a threat to presidential safety, which would functionally place such projects beyond meaningful review. Trump’s Response The president responded before the legal process was finished. In a long Truth Social post after the appeals court decision, Trump rejected the idea that he is just a tenant. He wrote that he and past presidents are not renters but leaders chosen by the people, with rights to fix, renovate, secure, protect, and improve the White House grounds. He also pointed out that the building has been rebuilt and repaired many times since 1792 without needing permission from Congress or anyone else. He called the ruling a national disgrace and said it was a threat to national security. What Is Actually at Stake The White House is not private property. It is owned by the federal government and held in trust for the public. Preservation laws and oversight are in place to stop any one person from making permanent changes for personal reasons. Trump started work on the East Wing before these legal questions were settled. Now, he wants the Supreme Court to approve his actions by calling the rest of the construction a security need. If the Court agrees, it could set a precedent that lets a president demolish first and get approval later, as long as the project is described as necessary for protection. The appeals court summed up the problem simply: a president is only a temporary tenant. The White House lasts longer than any administration, and the real owners are the people, not those currently living there. If you can afford to chip in less than $7/month as an annual supporter you can help us increase our coverage of Trump’s illegal and immortal activities and expose his administration. If you don’t have the means to contribute right now, please consider a free subscription so we can reach as many people as possible with our grassroot campaign! We’d love to continue this week off with your support! This Substack is reader-supported. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Democratic Reporter covers abuses of power that this administration would rather keep hidden. Subscribe for journalism that holds leaders accountable and keeps the facts clear. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.democraticreporter.com/subscribe

  7. Aug 13

    Trump’s Handpicked Board Just Found A Loophole To Put His Name Back On The Kennedy Center

    You could tell this story by focusing on the details instead of the drama, but that’s not what happened here. On Thursday morning, the board of trustees at the Kennedy Center voted to add a new inscription under the main sign. It will say, “Restored and Renovated by President Donald J. Trump.” The board claims this honors Trump for saving the institution from disaster, even though ticket sales dropped sharply while he was in charge. Here is why that inscription matters. In December, the same board voted to rename the center after Trump, a decision the White House announced with press secretary Karoline Leavitt calling it recognition of the unbelievable work she said he had done in saving the building. In May, U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper blocked it. His ruling was not subtle. The law establishing the center, he wrote, makes clear that it is to be named for President Kennedy and cannot carry another formal name or public memorial based on the board’s own unilateral say-so. Trump’s name was removed from the white marble facade in mid-June. The tarps have been hanging there ever since. So the board did not officially rename the building. Instead, they chose to add his name in a different way and challenge the court to respond. Representative Joyce Beatty of Ohio, an ex officio board member who sued the White House over the original renaming, described the inscription as a surprise agenda item and said the whole thing is a transparent effort to circumvent the court’s ruling that flies in the face of the statutes Congress passed. Norm Eisen, who represented Beatty in that suit, put it more bluntly, saying the defendants will now have to answer for their actions in court again. Check out our recent reporting on the already rusting columns from a no-bid renovation along with other issues being caused by Trump’s botched renovation of the Kennedy Center. The two-year shutdown is the bigger story The debate over the name will make the news, but the real impact comes from closing the building. The board voted Thursday to move forward with shutting down the main complex for a two-year renovation, keeping only the REACH, the smaller building on the campus, open for limited programming. National Symphony Orchestra performances and other signature events get pushed offsite. This is the second time the board has tried this. Cooper blocked the first attempt in May, finding that the decision had been made on a one-sided presentation of information and that trustees did not have sufficient information to justify it. When Trump claimed there had been a year-long review involving contractors and musical experts, the judge wrote that the evidence of any such review was nil. What makes Thursday’s vote more troubling is that the board had another option. Trustees could have chosen a four-year partial renovation that would have kept the Kennedy Center open, though it would have been disruptive and expensive. Instead, they picked the plan that shuts the building down. For two years, there will be no performances at the national cultural center. The building in the heart of Washington will be closed, with a new inscription honoring the person responsible for the shutdown. Critics have said from the start that the push to close the center is less about fixing the building and more about hiding poor results. Ticket sales have dropped sharply since Trump took over. Artists have left, and subscribers have canceled. When the building is closed, there are no attendance numbers to report. It is hard to show poor performance when there are no performances.t happens next Judge Cooper still needs to approve any closure, and he has already ruled that the board broke the law by adding Trump’s name to the venue. The court told the board to submit a status report on its construction plans and the tarps covering the facade within five days of the August meeting, making the deadline August 18. Legal action is likely to follow soon after. The Kennedy Center was created when Lyndon Johnson signed a bill in 1964, making it a living memorial to President Kennedy after his assassination. Congress gave it its name, and only Congress can change it. A board filled with Trump loyalists, after he removed Biden-appointed trustees, cannot overrule that just because the chairman wants his name on the building. They know the court ruled against them, but they are moving forward anyway, hoping no one will challenge them again. If you can afford to chip in less than $7/month as an annual supporter you can help us increase our coverage of Trump’s illegal and immortal activities and expose his administration. If you don’t have the means to contribute right now, please consider a free subscription so we can reach as many people as possible with our grassroot campaign! We’d love to continue this week off with your support! This Substack is reader-supported. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Democratic Reporter aims to hold the Trump administration accountable and show the facts to the people who pay the bills. Subscribe to keep this reporting going, and share this article with anyone who should know how their money is being spent. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.democraticreporter.com/subscribe

  8. Aug 13

    Blanche Sent The Justice Department to Rescue Trump’s IRS Settlement One Day After Taking Office

    Attorney General Todd Blanche took the oath at the White House on Monday. The next day, the Justice Department filed a brief in the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals supporting Donald Trump’s private lawyers as they tried to overturn a federal judge’s sanctions order, according to court records highlighted Wednesday by Politico’s Josh Gerstein. The brief asks the appeals court to stop and overturn an order that could undo a settlement made in May between Trump and the IRS. In that deal, Trump agreed to drop a $10 billion lawsuit against the agency. In exchange, Trump, his family, and his businesses were protected from IRS audits. No money was exchanged. Trump received an apology and protection. The Deal a Judge Called Fraud on the Court U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams put that arrangement in serious jeopardy in July. She issued a sanctions order against Trump’s legal team for fraud on the court and imposed a gag order barring anyone from referring to the settlement in any official proceeding. This was a rare and serious decision by the judge. She found that the lawyers had not just made mistakes or pushed too far, but had actually corrupted the legal process. The gag order made things worse for Trump’s team by making the settlement almost impossible to use in future legal cases. The brief filed at the Eleventh Circuit was signed by Acting Deputy Attorney General R. Trent McCotter. It argues that Trump’s original lawsuit over the leak of his tax returns by a government contractor was legitimate, claiming the plaintiffs suffered real harm that cannot be seriously questioned. McCotter also said the terms of the deal show it was real, not political. He noted that the complaint asked for $10 billion, but the settlement gave no money, just an apology. He also pointed out that it took 109 days to reach the agreement, arguing that collusive settlements are easy to spot. Republicans Extracted Written Promises The biggest issue for Blanche is not what Democrats said about him, but what Senate Republicans demanded before allowing his nomination to proceed. Sens. John Cornyn of Texas and Thom Tillis of North Carolina refused to advance Blanche out of the Judiciary Committee without written guarantees on this exact settlement. They wanted confirmation that the tax audit immunity applied only to the plaintiffs named in the lawsuit and not more broadly. They also wanted the proposed $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization fund” killed outright, according to NPR. Blanche provided the written promises before the vote. Cornyn and Tillis then said they were glad the Justice Department had officially ended the fund. Blanche also agreed to limit the audit deal. The Senate confirmed Blanche by a 50 to 49 vote on August 8, during an overnight session. If just one senator had changed their vote, the nomination would have failed. Cornyn and Tillis were satisfied with the written promises, and Blanche was sworn in at the White House on Monday. The Justice Department filed the brief supporting Trump’s private lawyers the following day. Democrats Called the Play in Advance During the confirmation process, Senate Democrats argued that Blanche would turn the Justice Department into Trump’s personal legal team. Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey warned that Blanche would act as Trump’s weapon against opponents and his protection from scrutiny. Sen. Adam Schiff of California made a similar point before the committee vote, saying Blanche would always act in Trump’s interest rather than for the American people, according to NBC News. At the time, those warnings were brushed off as partisan criticism from senators who opposed the nomination. Blanche did not wait a month or even a week to show the Justice Department’s priorities. He acted within 24 hours. What the Department Is Actually Arguing If you ignore the legal jargon, the situation is clear. The Justice Department, speaking for the United States, is asking a federal appeals court to remove sanctions against the president’s private lawyers and to lift limits on a settlement that protects the president’s personal finances from federal audit. The taxpayers who pay for this legal brief are the same people the IRS audits without exceptions, negotiations, or the chance to trade a lawsuit for lasting immunity. The agency Trump sued for $10 billion is the same one that audits regular people over a few thousand dollars in disputed deductions. Now, there is the question of how Cornyn and Tillis will respond. They based their votes on written promises about the settlement’s limits, but the Justice Department’s first major move under the new attorney general was to defend that settlement in court. Either the written promises were real and this filing breaks them, or the promises were just a way for the senators to vote yes without taking responsibility. Judge Williams found that Trump’s lawyers committed fraud on the court to obtain this deal. The Justice Department’s answer is that the deal looks fine because it took 109 days and produced no cash. That argument may or may not persuade the Eleventh Circuit. What it has already established is who the department works for. If you can afford to chip in less than $7/month as an annual supporter you can help us increase our coverage of Trump’s illegal and immortal activities and expose his administration. If you don’t have the means to contribute right now, please consider a free subscription so we can reach as many people as possible with our grassroot campaign! We’d love to continue this week off with your support! This Substack is reader-supported. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Democratic Reporter exists to hold the Trump administration accountable and expose the corruption its officials would rather keep buried. If this reporting matters to you, subscribe and share it. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.democraticreporter.com/subscribe

About

A grassroots progressive news platform funded by our audience and no one else. No billionaires, no investors, no compromises. PERIOD. www.democraticreporter.com