Philosophy of language: Dialogical Games and Discursive Process

Yael
  • 0.0 (0)
  • Philosophy

In this podcast, we argue that, in his critical essay on Brandom included in *Truth and Justification* (2001), Habermas reduces communication to its narrowly dialogical form. In doing so, he tends to overlook the fact that, for Brandom, the discursive process is primarily the product of a shared coordination of different individual perspectives, each contributing to the advancement of the game of giving and asking for reasons. Our aim is, first, to offer a critical analysis of Habermas’s position and, second, to do justice to Brandom’s account by highlighting the distinctive nature o

Episodes

  1. Aug 13

    Dialogical Games and Discursive Process

    We argue that, in his critical essay on Brandom included in Truth and Justification (2001), Habermas reduces communication to its narrowly dialogical form. In doing so, he tends to overlook the fact that, for Brandom, the discursive process is primarily the product of a shared coordination of different individual perspectives, each contributing to the advancement of the game of giving and asking for reasons. Our aim is, first, to offer a critical analysis of Habermas’s position and, second, to do justice to Brandom’s account by highlighting the distinctive nature of the discursive communicative process.

  • 1 Episode

About

In this podcast, we argue that, in his critical essay on Brandom included in *Truth and Justification* (2001), Habermas reduces communication to its narrowly dialogical form. In doing so, he tends to overlook the fact that, for Brandom, the discursive process is primarily the product of a shared coordination of different individual perspectives, each contributing to the advancement of the game of giving and asking for reasons. Our aim is, first, to offer a critical analysis of Habermas’s position and, second, to do justice to Brandom’s account by highlighting the distinctive nature o

Information