I’m just back from the Edinburgh Fringe where I did two shows a day, 22 times in 24 days. One show, Aaagony Aunts, is a panel show with my friend Pauline Eyre, where we solve problems brought to us by comedians and audience members, using mystic utensils, including the World Famous Salad Spinner of Destiny. The other is my solo show, Octopus. Neither of them is entirely without whimsy, but Octopus leans heavily towards silliness. I spend a lot of time dancing about in a ridiculous costume made of tights sewn to a belt. I do voices, I wang the tentacles about, I flirt aggressively with the audience. I have some incredible euphemisms for wanking. See? Whimsy! But just as the octopus has only one bone - a beak that can crack a clam shell - my show is built around a hard, sharp core: Rage. Rage that women still live in a world where we are expected to be both superhuman - handling the workplace, the home and everyone’s feelings at the same time - and somehow subhuman - a “decorative f******e”. (A line I dropped a few days into the run because it simply hit too hard to be funny.) Rage that we have to remain vigilant to male behaviour at all times, and yet turn a blind eye to it when it really matters. Rage that we live on the same planet as men, but somehow they have a totally different view of it. It’s like they’re on the land, looking out at it the sea we live in and seeing only the surface. This difference was gavelled home, half way through the Fringe, when I took part in a comedy improvised court room show. The idea is, before the show, audience members submit “crimes” that their companions have committed. Three comedians then use that information to play the parts of judge, prosecution and defence; they have a jolly fun time saying “m’lud, I put it to you that squeezing the toothpaste from the middle is not a crime under juris prudence statute lorem ipsum in pictura est puella” or whatever. It was my first time playing this game; as prosecutor I was to speak first. The first case came up. A woman, let’s call her “Echo”, accused her boyfriend, (“Narcissus”), of hitting a man who had been chatting her up in the pub. First of all, if true, this is an actual crime. Absolutely not an appropriate case for a jolly pretend courtroom panel game. Next, on examination, it turned out that Narcissus was happy to tell us that he had indeed hit the chatty man, giving the reason that the man’s “hand was moving nearer to Echo’s bum.” Not even touching it, just moving towards it. I asked Echo if she had felt unsafe with the chatty man, she replied no. She said she could handle herself, and that if she needed rescuing, she’d let her boyfriend know. She was - rightly - pretty cross with Narcissus, who could have chosen any number of non-violent means of interrupting her conversation with the chatty man, but chose to punch instead. It was clear she was bringing this “case” to seek public validation for her view that he had behaved badly. Meanwhile, Narcissus was pretty pleased with himself that he’d fended off the competition with what he described as “just a little slap.” But a slap from this man… ? Not so little. It transpired that Narcissus was an ex pro fighter, a martial artist. I’ve googled him. They called him “the KO kid” and “The Body Snatcher”. A trained martial artist is the last person who should be throwing fists at a man in the pub for any reason, let alone for something as trivial as this. So far, so distressing. So not comedy. As prosecution, I rested, letting my distinguished colleague on defence take over and I think he didn’t do too badly, to be honest, using sarcasm to show that he clearly thought Narcissus was in the wrong, while just doing his job of defending the indefensible and being as funny as he could about it. After all, it’s a comedy show, right? Meanwhile, I’ve taken it all a bit seriously, and Narcisssus is giving me death stares from the audience. The truth is, I’m standing up to him, but I’m a little scared. At the end of the case, the audience vote to see whether Narcissus is guilty and, guess what? Yes, he is guilty. By a whisker. Men in the audience call out to him he’s “a legend”. His own girlfriend cheers for his innocence (I suspect because she, too, feels the seething rage under his public jollity). The audience clearly haven’t picked up on the sarcasm in m’colleague’s tone. Or they did, but they prefer to vote against the strident killjoy, me. Echo doesn’t get her wholehearted validation. There are another two cases to limp through. I try to keep my stress levels down, be a bit funny and ignore the looks Narcissus is still shooting across the room at me. It’s nigh on impossible. The other cases are cut-and-dried in favour of my colleague. Throughout them, all I can think is, Echo is at risk. A man who is jealous and violent? Red flag city. I wonder how to slip her a pamphlet from a domestic violence charity from the stage. I worry that my fearlessness in confronting him may lead to repercussions for her. Once the audience has left, I bring up to the other comedians (all male, did I say that?) how hard I had found it to be funny because of the unpleasantness of the first case. I stated my genuine concerns for Echo. They agreed in a fairly dismissive way that we probably shouldn’t have “tried” that case in this comedy court, and that Narcissus had definitely overreacted by punching the chatty man. And then one of them said “ah, but it was good value for the show.” Good value for the show. Like they were looking at a sea full of shark fins, thinking it was a dolphin display. It’s exhausting, handing out metaphorical snorkels and masks and asking men to take a look into the other world that exists alongside their version of our planet. It’s what I’m trying to do in Octopus and I know that men who have seen it have experienced the sense of wonder and unsettledness that I feel when I’m exploring the sea. I also know that I’m glad that in Aaagony Aunts, we take problems seriously - as well as stupidly. Yes, we’re using the Salad Spinner of Destiny, and that’s a lot of fun. But when a 19 year old woman told us in one show, that she had been approached online by a distinguished man in his 50s, we put the format aside. All four female panellists listened carefully, then gave her proper advice on safe ways to disclose what had happened. When a man revealed that he was lonely after his divorce, we thanked him for talking about it, and suggested places to meet people. Some of them were funny, but in between the jokes, sensible, useable advice emerged. It’s all very well having a comedy format, but when you’re playing with audience’s lives, the game can get real. It’s worth remembering. You can see Octopus at the Wardrobe Theatre, Bristol, on 12th November. It’s genuinely a lot of fun, even for men. One Gen Z man called Lewis, who saw it wrote, “Absolutely brilliant! Everyone in our group had such a great time. The humour was seriously on point, with loads of moments that had us all laughing.The show is clever and poignant underneath all the comedy. It has quite a lot to say about men, masculinity and the things we don't always talk about, but it never feels preachy.I'd definitely recommend taking your boyfriend, son, dad, brother or any men in your life. I honestly think there's a lot that many men could take from this show (as well as having a really good laugh!)” Sadly, Narcissus couldn’t make it. https://thewardrobetheatre.com/shows/louise-leigh-octopus/ This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit louiseleigh.substack.com