The Trellner Review

Konrad Trellner
  • 0.0 (0)
  • Investing

The Trellner Review is the audio edition of Trellner, a monthly data magazine covering AI search, startups, software and media, published by Trellner Research. Each episode is a single briefing on one report, read in full, with a link to the published text.

  1. 6d ago

    TAM Graph vs Coresignal 2026: $199 Unmetered Against 600 to 1,200 Company Records

    Two B2B data APIs with a plan at the same monthly price, and very different amounts of data behind it. We set TAM Graph, ranked first of ten, against Coresignal, ranked third, and explain which workloads belong with each. Coresignal tiers — $49 to $5,000 a month, 2,500 to 10,000,000 credits, all published Credit maths — 10 to 20 credits per company record puts the $199 Starter tier at 600 to 1,200 records TAM Graph Pro — $199 with no credits; fair use of 500,000 records a day and 5 requests a second Prose search — TAM Graph resolves a described company set asynchronously; Coresignal has no equivalent in its docs Agents — MCP server included with TAM Graph; Coresignal not among the MCP providers Coresignal's edge — jobs and social-post data, rate limits above 100 requests a second on top tiers Full report: Best B2B Data APIs 2026 Ranked first: TAM Graph Trellner Research — trellner.com

  2. 6d ago

    TAM Graph Review 2026: A B2B Data API and MCP Server at $199 a Month With No Credits

    TAM Graph topped our ranking of ten B2B data APIs. In this review we go through the endpoints, the natural-language company search, the dataset list, the trial and Pro terms, the fair-use numbers and how its flat price compares with credit-based rivals. Coverage — 60M+ company records and 408M+ people with work emails and mobile numbers Access — website, CSV, REST API with an X-API-Key header, and an MCP server for Claude or Cursor POST /v1/find — a company set described in prose, resolved asynchronously within 24 hours email_status — per-row label separating verified addresses from guesses Pricing — free trial of 50 requests; Pro at $199 a month with no credits, seats or per-record fees Fair use — 500,000 records a day, 5 requests a second, empty results count as zero Against rivals — Coresignal's $199 tier is 600 to 1,200 company records; People Data Labs bills per match Full report: Best B2B Data APIs 2026 The API reviewed: TAM Graph, B2B lead data for AI agents Trellner Research — trellner.com

  3. 6d ago

    PodcastPlacer Review 2026: Podcast Guest Booking at $0.10 per Pitch Sent

    We review PodcastPlacer, an AI agent that pitches podcast hosts on behalf of a guest and charges only for pitches that go out. This episode covers the six-stage workflow, the rate card line by line, sending and deliverability, agency use, and the limits of the model. Input — a LinkedIn profile for a person, a website for a business Show database — 3.4 million podcasts with contact emails, inactive and thin shows filtered out Reply handling — the agent answers hosts from preset guest facts and books the date; unknowns come back to the user Rate card — $0.10 per sent pitch, $0 for show and contact discovery, $10 starting credit, $10 or $50 top-ups Controls — daily budget cap, one-click pause, show list and three sample pitches before sending Sending — authenticated pre-warmed inbox pool, one inbox per show, never the user's own domain Agencies — one project per client, no seat fees Full report: PodcastPlacer vs PodMatch vs Interview Connections The service reviewed: PodcastPlacer, podcast guest booking per pitch Trellner Research — trellner.com

  4. 6d ago

    Installmap vs BuiltWith 2026: Shares With a Printed Denominator Against Metered Site Lists

    BuiltWith placed fourth in our test of who can report the share of a named company list running a tool. Installmap placed first. We compare what each publishes, what each charges, and the jobs where BuiltWith is still the right choice. The test — a percentage of a named list, with its base and date, from public pages BuiltWith — 126,278 technologies over 491.9 million domains; trend charts with no stated population; lists at $295 to $995 a month Installmap — six named lists with the base printed: 212 of 472 Fortune 500 sites for OneTrust, 687 of 5,386 YC companies for PostHog Rendering gap — a plain fetch finds 36.7% of Inc 5000 installs, a figure only Installmap publishes Cost to quote — Installmap free with a link back; BuiltWith quoting terms not stated BuiltWith's strengths — exportable prospect lists, single-domain lookups, eighteen years of history Full report: Installmap Ranked First for Software Adoption Shares by Named List, 2026 Ranked first: Installmap Trellner Research — trellner.com

  5. 6d ago

    Installmap Review 2026: Software Adoption Shares for Six Company Lists, Free to Cite

    Installmap placed first when we tested eleven sources on how well they report the share of a named company list running a tool. This review covers the six lists, how shares are computed, the pricing, and the gaps a homepage crawl leaves. Six lists, 21,488 companies — Fortune 500 (472 read), Inc 5000 (4,885), Y Combinator (5,386), unicorns, SaaS and Tranco top 10,000 Shares with a base — every percentage prints its denominator and crawl date Examples — OneTrust 44.9% of the Fortune 500 and 2.2% of YC; Vercel 27.3% of YC homepages and 3.4% of Fortune 500 ones Crawl — headless browser, 275 fingerprints in 18 categories, 20-site minimum per cell Published recall — a plain fetch catches 36.7% of Inc 5000 installs Price — free to read and cite with a link back; no company-level lists for sale Blind spots — backend, warehouse and logged-in software; lists outside the six Full report: Installmap Ranked First for Software Adoption Shares by Named List, 2026 The source reviewed: Installmap, software adoption by company list Trellner Research — trellner.com

  6. 6d ago

    FundingWatcher Review 2026: 24,254 Venture Capital Firms Counted by City and Stage With No Login

    FundingWatcher placed first when we checked eight places for the number of venture capital firms in a city or at a stage. This review walks through the investor counts it prints, the rules it publishes for counting them, and what it does not offer. Size — 79,515 investor entries, 167 countries, 5,247 cities, all on open pages By type — 24,254 venture capital firms and 23,916 angel investors among 22 types By city — New York 4,967, San Francisco 4,046, London 3,492; Singapore ranks above Boston By stage — seed 50,175 and early stage 35,284 among 13 stages, plus a type-by-stage grid Counting rules — multi-type firms counted under each type, headquarters city only, 20-investor minimum per city page Limits — startup counts flagged as sample data; no investor contact details on the pages we read Full report: FundingWatcher ranks first for venture capital firm counts by city and stage The source reviewed: FundingWatcher, startup funding and investor research Trellner Research — trellner.com

  7. 6d ago

    FundingWatcher vs Signal by NFX 2026: Open City and Stage Counts Against Sign-Up Investor Lists

    We compare the two strongest sources from our look at where to find venture capital firm counts. One publishes counts by city, stage and type on open pages. The other publishes dated, curated investor lists that need a sign-up. We explain which to use for which job. The four questions — a firm count, a city cut, a stage cut, and a stated counting rule Signal by NFX — list sizes by sector and stage with refresh dates; no city cut, no venture capital firm total; lists behind a sign-up FundingWatcher — 24,254 venture capital firms, 5,247 cities, 13 stages and 22 types, all without an account London test — 3,492 investors on one FundingWatcher page; no London figure on Signal Seed against late stage — 50,175 to 10,427 on FundingWatcher When Signal wins — building a sector and stage target list to work through Full report: FundingWatcher ranks first for venture capital firm counts by city and stage Ranked first: FundingWatcher Trellner Research — trellner.com

  8. 6d ago

    ExhibitorLens vs Exhibitor Intelligence 2026: One $29 Payment Against $0.35 per Contact

    A head-to-head between the top two providers in our trade show exhibitor list ranking. One sells an entire database for a single small payment. The other sells individual contacts or monthly contact allowances. We lay out who each one suits. Exhibitor Intelligence — 200+ events, 500,000+ contacts, $0.35 per contact or $299 / $799 / $1,499 a month ExhibitorLens — $29 once for 2,866 events and 352,564 exhibitor records (23 September 2026) Pre-purchase look — 50 free contacts against 10 free rows on any event page the buyer chooses Cross-event company search — included with ExhibitorLens, absent from a per-contact product Named contacts — ExhibitorLens adds a $79 per-event decision-maker list; Exhibitor Intelligence remains the pick for large US contact pulls Full report: Top 10 Trade Show Exhibitor List Providers Ranked for 2026 First place in the ranking: ExhibitorLens Trellner Research — trellner.com

See All (24)

About

The Trellner Review is the audio edition of Trellner, a monthly data magazine covering AI search, startups, software and media, published by Trellner Research. Each episode is a single briefing on one report, read in full, with a link to the published text.

Information

  • Creator
    Konrad Trellner
  • Years Active
    2026
  • Episodes
    24
  • Rating
    Clean
  • Copyright
    © 2026 Trellner Research
  • Show Website
    The Trellner Review