July 12, 2026, Message by P. Kevin Clancey Transcribed by Beluga AI. So, 1 Corinthians 8. 1 Now about food sacrificed to idols: We know that "we all have knowledge." Knowledge puffs up, but love builds up. 2 If anyone thinks he knows anything, he does not yet know it as he ought to know it. 3 But if anyone loves God, he is known by him. 4 About eating food sacrificed to idols, then, we know that "an idol is nothing in the world," and that "there is no God but one." 5 For even if there are so-called gods, whether in heaven or on earth—as there are many "gods" and many "lords"— 6 yet for us there is one God, the Father. All things are from him, and we exist for him. And there is one Lord, Jesus Christ. All things are through him, and we exist through him. 7 However, not everyone has this knowledge. Some have been so used to idolatry up until now that when they eat food sacrificed to an idol, their conscience, being weak, is defiled. 8 Food will not bring us close to God. We are not worse off if we don't eat, and we are not better if we do eat. 9 But be careful that this right of yours in no way becomes a stumbling block to the weak. 10 For if someone sees you, the one who has knowledge, dining in an idol's temple, won't his weak conscience be encouraged to eat food offered to idols? 11 So the weak person, the brother or sister for whom Christ died, is ruined by your knowledge. 12 Now when you sin like this against brothers and sisters and wound their weak conscience, you are sinning against Christ. 13 Therefore, if food causes my brother or sister to fall, I will never again eat meat, so that I won't cause my brother or sister to fall. (1 Corinthians 8:1-13, CSB) May the words of my mouth and the meditation of our hearts be acceptable in your sight, O Lord, our Rock, our Strength and Redeemer. Amen. 14 May the words of my mouth and the meditation of my heart be acceptable to you, Lord, my rock and my Redeemer. (Psalms 19:14, CSB) So, Paul is dealing with a series of issues in the Corinthian Church that he planted and spent 18 months there. And so he introduces each issue with these words: "Now about…," "Now, concerning…" And so the first issue, if you remember, were divisions in the Church—"I'm of Apollos, I'm of Paul, I'm of Cephas." The second has to do with sexual morality and what marriage means and what it means to be husband and wife and marriage and divorce and singleness and all that. The Corinthians were saying first, there were divisions. Second, they were saying, "Since we have liberty in Christ, we can still go to the temple prostitutes and indulge there with the prostitutes. But, you know, we're free in Christ to do that. We don't worship those idols anymore. But we still…" And Paul says, "No, you can't do that. You can't join your body, which is joined to Christ, to that of a prostitute. And don't you know, in God's ideal of marriage, one man, one woman… It's found in Genesis… one man, one woman. For this reason, a man will leave his father and mother, be united to his wife, not his wives, and the two will become one flesh." 5 and he also said, 'For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two will become one flesh'? (Matthew 19:5, CSB) And that is strongly reinforced then in the New Testament. I know in the Old Testament they practice polygamy. There are reasons for that, historical reasons. There's reasons God allowed it, mostly for the protection, safety, and care of women. But God's ideal has always been to represent His covenant love with His people, with the picture of marriage. And so that he reinforces that to the Corinthians. Now, the third issue he's bringing up is food offered to idols. And you think, well, if the Bible is ever irrelevant, it's this. I mean, none of us today are in a quandary over—you know, we went to Safeway, and we were looking in the meat aisle and said, "I don't know if this food has been offered to idols or not. I don't know whether I should get it or not." You know, when I went over to Brian's house and he would graciously barbecue up for us burgers and brats, I never—my conscience was never smitten with—"I wonder if, you know, Brian dedicated these brats and burgers to idols before he put them on the grill." I just ate them. They were good, you know, and when Stevin cooks something up, same thing, it's like, it's good. But there are analogies in our modern world. And the basic point Paul is making here is don't let your Christian liberty, or as he calls it, your knowledge—and he uses that sarcastically with the Corinthians. Oh, your knowledge allows you to do this? Well, does your knowledge allow you to destroy another brother or sister in Christ who has a conscious qualm about this thing? And yes, you think their consciences are weak and you're strong, but when you wound them, when you hurt them, you're doing a great disservice. And so he starts by just being very clear up front. Knowledge puffs up, love builds up. And so this section is about simply this: the primacy of love over knowledge. The primacy of love over what you know or think you know. And so he deals with that because the Corinthians thought that they had arrived. They were a young church, but they were an arrogant church. They were all that. And later we'll get to this issue on spiritual pride when he talks to them about spiritual gifts. You know, they use spiritual gifts in the wrong way. They use spiritual gifts to elevate their status. Look, I speak in tongues, you know, a lot... And I prophesy a lot… I'm more spiritual than you… I'm free to eat meat offered to idols... I'm more spiritual than you. And he's saying, "You're not spiritual at all. You're destroying your brothers and sisters. You're not spiritual at all." Knowledge can only lead, he says here, to being puffed up and the sin of pride. Does that mean don't study? No. The Bible says study to show yourself approved. Does that mean be willfully ignorant? No, don't be willfully ignorant. But one thing's true. There are very few areas in human life that are more prone and more dangerous to the sin of pride than intellect. And I always preach to myself. When I preach, I just don't preach to you. And this one applies to me, man, because I love, love, love, love to win the argument. And part of that is… I think part of that is a gift. You know, I think logically, I think reasonably—I think I do—and I think things through, and I can articulate them. And that, I think that helps me be a teacher, but it also can make me a jerk. And I've done this. Now, some people are not offended because when I basically debate somebody theologically—not just theology, by the way, baseball versus sailing, for example, which is kind of a no-brainer—but, you know, I'll debate people about all sorts of things, and I'm very opinionated. I'm very opinionated. And actually only a handful, not all sorts of things. There's only a handful of issues I think I know anything about. You know, I would not debate Stevin about horses. Like, you're the guy. I know nothing about horses. It's just that they're big, and I don't want to get on anything that big. When I have a car, why would I? But I'll trust you that there's fun and joy in that. I'll trust you with that. You know, I wouldn't debate Brian about anything to do at all with math or engineering. I easily concede, you know way more than me about all that stuff. You know way more than me about bicycle repair, you know, you know way more than me. But when it comes to, like, the three or four issues that I think I know something about, you know, there we go. And some people like that interchange, and they're not offended by it. Other people, when you're just talking about things and say, "Well, what about this opinion? What about that?" And you think you're just bringing stuff up, actually they see that as an attack. It took me a long time to learn that. People are like, "Why are you attacking me?" I'm not attacking you. I'm actually helping relieve you of your stupidity and ignorance in my humility and brilliance. I'm your friend here. Other people are fine with it. Other people are fine. You know, I got in an argument online with Josh D'Intinosanto, who's our one Calvinist at Firehouse Church, and we were debating online. We were going at it, you know, it was on Facebook. And we had friends—I had friends interject and say, "Now, now boys, be good to each other." And neither Josh nor I were the least bit offended. I mean, you know, I called him a gravy-sucking, determinist Calvinist, and he called me a semi-Pelagian, heretic wimp. And we were fine with that. It was like, all in love and so… But other people get offended by that sort of thing, and so you got to be careful. And so there was another guy I was debating with online, and the Lord just really—it was during COVID, and he was stating the principle, he's a Christian man, and he was stating the principle that out of Christian love all Christians should get the vaccine because if you love your brother and your sister, you will get the vaccine so you won't get and transmit the disease. And I said, "I concede that point if the data showed that the vaccine stopped you from getting and transmitting the disease." But very quickly after the vaccine got going, the evidence seemed to suggest that the primary benefit of the vaccine was that it prevented people who had comorbidities and got Covid from nearly a serious case of COVID. And I thought, well then great, let my 80-year-old mother-in-law get the vaccine. I'm entirely in favor of it, but I don't want my, you know, 30-something-year-old pregnant daughter to get it. And I certainly don't want my grandsons to get it because I'm not sure what this thing does. You know, if you're 80, 85 and it does som