I saw this podcast come up in my feed . It caught my attention as I am also going thru the online / dating scene . I appreciate the insight from Logan on all aspects of dating. I really respect the openness which Shane displayed with his own personal situation. It resonated very much with me . Thanks to the both of you.

Shane Parrish fails to do his job as an interviewer on this one. In one breath, Josh Wolfe says DOGE’s work is “virtuous”. In the next, he extols the value of basic research and the importance of government funding. Shane never confronts the incongruity, never asks his interviewee to reconcile these opinions. Too many of the episodes are wishy-washy chats between guys who all seem to be members of the same club, with no real journalistic skills.

overall, been loving the podcast for years. however, the recent new series that started with book reviews (episode 214) really made me question things. a lot of the words and sentence structure felt a bit like it was ‘assisted’ in being written and I wasn’t able to finish the episode. Many of the sentences had similar structures to what i’ve been hearing from ai assisted content and didn’t feel much like typical episodes. Just curious what others think.

Loved your conversation with Charlie Hoehn. I felt like I was listening to a masterclass on how to write and market a book. Charlie provided tremendous value they anyone who is an author or who aspires to be an author can use.