Science Fictions

Tom Chivers and Stuart Ritchie

A weekly podcast about the latest scientific controversies, with Tom Chivers and Stuart Ritchie sciencefictionspod.substack.com

  1. Episode 95: Critical thinking

    -2 DIAS

    Episode 95: Critical thinking

    This episode is dedicated to Justin Eldridge. We like to think that, in often hamfisted ways, we’re applying critical thinking on this show. But what even is “critical thinking”? Can you measure it? Can you teach it to kids—or for that matter, to anyone? Can teaching critical thinking help people defend themselves against misinformation and disinformation? It would be very ironic if “critical thinking” had become a buzzword in the world of education—a buzzword that people used, er, uncritically… The Science Fictions podcast is brought to you by the marvellous Works in Progress magazine. The article on Swiss vs. Japanese watches that we mention in the episode can be found at this link, and all the other Works in Progress articles can be found at worksinprogress.co. Show notes * NY Times article on schools teaching critical thinking * UK Government Curriculum Review from 2025 * Daisy Christodoulou on teaching students to spot misinformation * Daniel Willingham’s 2007 article on critical thinking * His book Why Don’t Students Like School? * The Pacific Northwest Tree Octopus study * The tree octopus website * 2017 Dutch replication study * Two bigger studies in 2016 and 2019 * 2015 meta-analysis in Review of Educational Research * Woodworth and Thorndike (1901) - a psychological classic * Herbert Simon on “problem isomorphs” * The Stanford Civic Online Reasoning programme Credits We’re very grateful to Daisy Christodoulou for talking to us for this episode. Any mistakes are, of course, our own. The Science Fictions podcast is produced by Julian Mayers at Yada Yada Productions. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.com/subscribe

    1 h 1 min
  2. Episode 94: Medical marijuana

    3/02

    Episode 94: Medical marijuana

    Here’s another episode that revists a topic we’ve covered before. A while back, we did an episode on the downsides of cannabis (for example, the risk of psychosis). But of course, a lot of people claim there are medical benefits, too! Not least among them is Donald Trump, who recently re-scheduled cannabis so that it can be studied more for medical purposes. That research is sorely needed. In this episode, we discuss the very uncertain state of our knowledge on medical marijuana. The Science Fictions podcast is brought to you by Works in Progress magazine, where you can find Samuel Hughes’s excellent new article on “Urban expansion in the age of liberalism”, as discussed in today’s episode. That’s at worksinprogress.co—which is packed full of other great articles on science, tech, and human progress. Show notes * “Trump expands access to cannabis” (December 2025) * Info from the DEA on drug schedules * The new JAMA review on medical marijuana * Reason article on the 2011 RAND study; Retraction Watch article on the same * Studies on the crime impacts of medical marijuana (increase; neutral; decrease) * Useful 2021 review of the wider societal effects of medical marijuana legalisation * 2020 Arizona “natural experiment” study * Washington Post article on the poor resemblance of “real” marijuana compared to what’s allowed for research studies * Survey on the use of cannabis for medical purposes Credits The Science Fictions podcast is produced by Julian Mayers at Yada Yada Productions. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.com/subscribe

    1 h 3 min
  3. Paid-only episode 26: Microplastics redux

    20/01

    Paid-only episode 26: Microplastics redux

    This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.com It’s rare that we return to a topic, but it’s also nice to have been right. In 2024 we did an episode on microplastics, and cast a lot of doubt on some of the more outrageous claims about them filling up your brain, your arteries, and (for the fellas) your testicles. Since then a lot more flaws in the science have been found—and at least one of them is utterly devastaing. Become a paid subscriber to listen to the full episode and read the show notes.

    11 min

  4. 13/01

    Episode 93: Many analysts

    Here’s a cheery one for our first episode of the year. Guess what happens when you give several sets of scientists the same dataset and ask them to answer the same question? Well, they all find the same results, right? Right!? Sadly not. This “Many Analysts” problem has been analysed and debated in multiple different scientific fields and across several papers. We cover them in this episode. What does it tell us about the objectivity of science if different teams draw different conclusions from the exact same data? The Science Fictions podcast is brought to you by Works in Progress magazine. Their excellent new article on how we’re living in “the golden age of vaccine development”, as discussed on the show, can be found (along with the rest of their articles on science, history, and technology), at worksinprogress.co. We’re very grateful that they support the podcast. Show notes * 2015 Nature commentary article on “crowdsourced research” (on racism in football) * And the full 2018 writeup titled “Many Analysts, One Data Set” * Gelman and Loken on the “Garden of Forking Paths” * 2020 many-analysts neuroscience (fMRI) paper * And the plan for the similar study on EEG * 2022 PNAS many-analysts paper on the “hidden universe of uncertainty” * 2026 critique on ideological bias from George Borjas * 2023 critique on effect sizes vs. statistical significance * 2025 ecology & evolution many-analysts paper on blue tits and eucalyptus * 2025 economics many-analysts paper with results on data cleaning * 2024 PNAS critique of many-analysts research * Julia Rohrer’s critique of multiverse analysis Credits The Science Fictions podcast is produced by Julian Mayers at Yada Yada Productions. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.com/subscribe

    1 h 19 min

  5. 30/12/2025

    A Christmas 2025 compendium

    We’ve covered a lot of bad science stories over the year. Here are a few more. But in the optimistic spirit of the “holiday season”, the last one has a happy ending. Thanks for listening—especially if you’re a subscriber! See you in 2026. Stuart & Tom Show notes * A surge of low-quality AI papers on public datasets * A surge of low-quality AI letters to the editor * Retraction Watch story on the Dana Farber scandal * NY Times story on the papers being retracted or corrected * The settlement in the case Credits The Science Fictions podcast is produced by Julian Mayers at Yada Yada Productions. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.com/subscribe

    32 min

  6. 16/12/2025

    Episode 92: Oliver Sacks

    STOP PRESS: a beloved 20th Century populariser of psychology who wrote massively successful books has been shown to be full of crap. Actually… don’t stop press. Just put it on the pile with all the others. This time it’s Oliver Sacks, the neurologist who wrote The Man Who Mistook his Wife for a Hat, Awakenings, and many other books. An article in The New Yorker has shown that a lot of his case studies were, well… let’s say they’re not what they seem. In this episode we discuss the new article and Oliver Sacks’s career more generally, and ask: should we have known? The Science Fictions podcast is brought to you by Works in Progress magazine. The article we discussed on today’s show is about the tragically low South Korean birth rate, and why it got that way. Find that, and so many more articles about human progress, science, and technology, at worksinprogress.co. Show notes * Rachel Aviv’s December 2025 New Yorker article on Oliver Sacks * Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders letter about “questionable aspects” of the autistic savant twins story, by Makoto Yamaguchi * Follow-up article by the same author * Response letter by Allan Snyder * Medical Humanities article on 10 years since Sacks’s death * Paul McHugh’s 1995 bad review of Sacks’s work * Science isn’t storytelling Credits The Science Fictions podcast is produced by Julian Mayers at Yada Yada Productions. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.com/subscribe

    1 h 10 min

  7. 02/12/2025

    Paid-only episode 25: The menopause and hormone replacement therapy

    This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.com Does the evidence support the use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT)? Depends on when you asked the question. At one point the consensus was “yes”; more recently it reversed. But should it have? It also depends on what symptoms you’re talking about. Is HRT just all about hot flushes, or can it also treat mood and cognitive problems too? In this paid-only episode, we look at the evidence. To listen to the full episode and read the show notes, please become a paid subscriber to the Science Fictions podcast.

    10 min
  8. Unpaywalled: Jonathan Haidt vs. social media

    26/11/2025

    Unpaywalled: Jonathan Haidt vs. social media

    Hello everyone! We weren’t able to record a podcast this week, because 1) Stuart was busy and 2) it’s Tom’s birthday. So by way of apology we’re re-releasing this one about some drama last year between Jon Haidt, sworn enemy of smartphones, and some guys who like meta-analyses. Hope you enjoy it! A while back, The Studies Show covered the question of whether smartphones and social media cause mental health problems. Amazingly, that podcast didn’t settle the issue, and the debate has continued—and continued rather acrimoniously. Psychologists—most notably Jonathan Haidt—are currently laying into each other, analysing, re-analysing, and meta-analysing datasets to try and work out whether “it’s the phones”. In this paid-only episode of The Studies Show, Tom and Stuart explain the story so far, and in the process get very disappointed by their heroes. If you want to hear the whole episode and read the show notes, it’s easy to become a paid subscriber at thestudiesshowpod.com. Show notes * The summary of Jonathan Haidt’s upcoming book, Life After Babel * The Google Doc on social media effects maintained by Haidt, Twenge, and Rausch * Christopher Ferguson’s meta-analysis of causal social media effects studies * Very useful online calculator to interpret effect sizes * Study on the (non-)relation between reported and measured phone use * Haidt & Rausch’s first article criticising the Ferguson meta-analysis and re-calculating the effects * Anne Scheel’s critical tweet * Matt Jané’s first article responding to Haidt & Rausch * Haidt & Rausch respond to Jané (and criticise Ferguson again) * Jané responds to Haidt & Rausch, again * Haidt & Rausch’s second (or is it third?) article criticising the Ferguson meta-analysis (this is the one where they note the more basic errors) * Article by Mike Males making the point that, whoever is right, the effects are all very small Credits * The Studies Show is produced by Julian Mayers at Yada Yada Productions. We’re very grateful to Malte Elson, Pete Etchells, and Matt Jané for talking to us for this episode—but any errors are our own. This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.com/subscribe

    1 h
Ver tudo (131)

Sobre

A weekly podcast about the latest scientific controversies, with Tom Chivers and Stuart Ritchie sciencefictionspod.substack.com

Informação

  • Autoria
    Tom Chivers and Stuart Ritchie
  • Anos em atividade
    2023 - 2026
  • Episódios
    131
  • Classificação
    Para todos
  • Copyright
    © Tom Chivers and Stuart Ritchie
  • Site do programa
    Science Fictions

Talvez também goste