The Conversation

•

Canal • 21 programas

Nutrición

Nutrición

Cada semana
Comentarios de noticias

Comentarios de noticias

Cada semana
Política

Política

Dos veces a la semana

Noticias de negocios

Noticias de negocios

01/07/2021
Noticias

Noticias

28/04/2020
Noticias

Noticias

06/04/2021
Para toda la familia

Para toda la familia

Cada semana
Ciencias

Ciencias

31/07/2019
Política

Política

Dos veces a la semana
Ciencias de la vida

Ciencias de la vida

Dos veces al mes

17/10/2024

MicroRNA: Victor Ambros on the discovery that won him the Nobel prize

Victor Ambros and Gary Ruvkun were awarded the 2024 Nobel prize in physiology or medicine for their discovery of microRNA, tiny biological molecules that tell the cells in our body what kind of cell to be by turning on and off certain genes. In this episode, we speak to Ambros, who is professor of natural sciences at UMass Chan Medical School in the US, about the discovery that led to his Nobel prize and find out what he’s researching now. And we hear from Justin Stebbing, professor of biomedical sciences at Anglia Ruskin University in the UK, about how a deeper understanding of microRNA is opening up new avenues for potential treatment of diseases such as cancer. This episode was produced by Gemma Ware, Katie Flood and Mend Mariwany. Sound design was by Michelle Macklem and our theme music is by Neeta Sarl. Full credits for this episode are available. Sign up here for a free daily newsletter from The Conversation. If you like the show, please consider donating to The Conversation, which is an independent, not-for-profit news organisation. And please do rate and review the show wherever you listen. Further reading:MicroRNA − a new Nobel laureate describes the scientific process of discovering these tiny molecules that turn genes on and offMicroRNA is the Nobel-winning master regulator of the genome – researchers are learning to treat disease by harnessing how it controls genesNobel prize in medicine awarded for discovery of microRNAs, the molecules that control our genesFull coverage of the 2024 Nobel prizes on The Conversation

17/10/2024

•

25 min
05/09/2024

The emotional toll of dating apps and why they're no longer about finding love

Dating apps are having a rocky moment, with some of the biggest struggling to attract paying users. In this episode, we hear from researchers exploring how dating apps have changed modern dating and the expectations around it. And we find out why some dating app users aren’t actually there looking for love, but keep on swiping anyway. Featuring Treena Orchard, associate professor at the School of Health Studies at Western University in Canada, and Carolina Bandinelli associate professor in media and creative industries at the University of Warwick in the UK. This episode was written and produced by Mend Mariwany, with assistance from Katie Flood and sound design by Michelle Macklem. Our theme music is by Neeta Sarl. Gemma Ware is the executive producer. Full credits for this episode are available. Sign up here for a free daily newsletter from The Conversation. If you like the show, please consider donating to The Conversation, which is an independent, not-for-profit news organisation. And please do rate and review the show wherever you listen. If you listen on PocketCasts, they've just launched the ability to rate shows here. Further reading:Swipe right or left? How dating apps are impacting modern masculinityDating apps are accused of being ‘addictive’. What makes us keep swiping?The problems with dating apps and how they could be fixed – two relationship experts discussDating apps: Lack of regulation, oversight and competition affects quality, and millions stand to lose

05/09/2024

•

29 min
26/09/2024

Himpathy: the psychology of why some people side with perpetrators of sexual misconduct

What makes some people more likely to feel disproportionate sympathy to people facing accusations of sexual misconduct – a concept known as himpathy? In this episode, we speak to a human behaviour expert whose research seeks to understand the psychological factors behind it. Featuring Samantha Dodson, assistant professor of organizational behaviour and human resources at the University of Calgary in Canada, and an introduction form Eleni Vlahiotis, business and economy editor at The Conversation in Canada. This episode was written and produced by Katie Flood with assistance from Mend Mariwany and sound design by Michelle Macklem. Gemma Ware is the executive producer. Our theme music is by Neeta Sarl. Full credits for this episode are available. Sign up here for a free daily newsletter from The Conversation. If you like the show, please consider donating to The Conversation, which is an independent, not-for-profit news organisation. And please do rate and review the show wherever you listen. Further reading:How ‘himpathy’ helps shield perpetrators of sexual misconduct from repercussionsTrump found liable for assaulting, defaming E. Jean Carroll – after a trial where he relied on a discredited myth about how women should react to rapeKavanaugh is a reminder: Accused sexual harassers get promoted anyway

26/09/2024

•

24 min
29/03/2023

Cool beasts

Fear & Wonder is a new climate podcast, brought to you by The Conversation. It takes you inside the United Nations’ era-defining climate report via the hearts and minds of the scientists who wrote it. The show is sponsored by the Climate Council, an independent, evidence-based organisation working on climate science, impacts and solutions. The show is hosted by Joelle Gergis, a climate scientist and lead author for the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and her friend Michael Green, an award-winning journalist. In the last episode, we heard about some older, natural and human records that show us how the climate is changing. In this episode, Michael and Joelle continue that trail to the present day, investigating some of the new ways that scientists are observing the changing climate, particularly sea level rise. Icelandic scientist Guðfinna ‘Tolly’ Aðalgeirsdóttir explains how she got into glaciology, what the advances are in the measurement of glacier and ice sheets, and takes listeners on a field trip to measure the summer snow melt on a glacier. We then hear from oceanographer Matt Palmer, who talks about advances in the measurement of ocean depth. If you liked this episode, you might also like to subscribe to The Conversation's new Science Wrap newsletter: https://bit.ly/406nQgk. And if you really like the show, please consider donating to The Conversation – we're a non-profit newsroom who rely on the support of our readers to fund our expert-led journalism: https://bit.ly/42ABoCi. If you'd like to support the Climate Council and receive your free copy of Joelle's book Humanity's Moment, click here: https://bit.ly/40sQ4BP. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

29/03/2023

•

44 min
10/10/2024

What Israel and its neighbours want now

The Middle East is perilously close to all-out war. In the year since the October 7 Hamas-led attacks on Israel, millions of people have been displaced from their homes in Gaza, Israel, the West Bank and now Lebanon, and tens of thousands killed. In this episode, we speak to two experts from the Middle East, Mireille Rebeiz and Amnon Aran, to get a sense of the strategic calculations being made by both Israel and its neighbours at this frightening moment for the region. Rebeiz is chair of Middle East Studies at Dickinson College in the US and Aran is professor of International Relations, City St George's, University of London in the UK. This episode was produced by Mend Mariwany and mixed by Michelle Macklem. Full credits for this episode are available. If you like the show, please consider donating to The Conversation, which is an independent, not-for-profit news organisation. And please do rate and review the show wherever you listen. Further reading and listening:Does Hezbollah represent Lebanon? And what impact will the death of longtime leader Hassan Nasrallah have? October 7 marks 12 months of escalation into the ‘forever war’ now engulfing the Middle EastA year of escalating conflict in the Middle East has ushered in a new era of regional displacement Inside the Oslo accords: a new podcast series marks 30 years since Israel-Palestine secret peace negotiations

10/10/2024

•

36 min
30/08/2024

Geoengineering part 2: the case against reflecting sunlight to cool the Earth

In the second of two episodes on geoengineering, we hear the case against trying to reflect sunlight to cool the Earth. Solar radiation modification has attracted attention and investment in recent years as a way to potential reverse the effects of climate change, but it remains a controversial idea. We hear from researchers pushing a non-use agreement for solar geoengineering who explain why they believe these types of technologies are a dangerous distraction from what needs to be done to reduce fossil fuel emissions. Featuring Chukwumerije Okereke, professor in global governance and public policy at the University of Bristol, and Co-Director at the Center for Climate Change and Development at Alex Ekwueme Federal University in Nigeria and Aarti Gupta, professor of global environmental governance at Wageningen University in the Netherlands. And responses from Shaun Fitzgerald at the Centre for Climate Change at the University of Cambridge in the UK Listen to the first episode to hear scientists who argue modifying the climate can help buy the world time. This episode was written and produced by Mend Mariwany and Gemma Ware, with assistance from Katie Flood and sound design by Michelle Macklem. Our theme music is by Neeta Sarl. Full credits for this episode are available. Sign up here for a free daily newsletter from The Conversation. Further reading: Not such a bright idea: cooling the Earth by reflecting sunlight back to space is a dangerous distractionSolar geoengineering might work, but local temperatures could keep rising for yearsBlocking out the sun won’t fix climate change – but it could buy us timeThe overshoot myth: you can’t keep burning fossil fuels and expect scientists of the future to get us back to 1.5°CAfrica has vast gas reserves – here’s how to stop them adding to climate change

30/08/2024

•

32 min
12/06/2025

Pemerintah cairkan BSU: solusi lesunya daya beli masyarakat?

Pemerintah Indonesia kembali menggulirkan program Bantuan Subsidi Upah (BSU) sebagai bagian dari upaya menjaga daya beli masyarakat pekerja di tengah tekanan ekonomi. Program ini mulai dicairkan pada 5 Juni 2025, menyasar para buruh dan pekerja yang memenuhi syarat tertentu sesuai regulasi ketenagakerjaan dan kebijakan ekonomi nasional. BSU ini dirancang sebagai bentuk intervensi fiskal langsung untuk membantu kelompok pekerja yang terdampak dinamika ekonomi seperti deflasi atau menurunnya daya beli masyarakat. Bantuan ini diberikan sebesar Rp300.000 per bulan selama dua bulan (Juni–Juli) dan langsung dicairkan sekaligus sebesar Rp600.000 pada bulan Juni. Pemerintah mengalokasikan dana sebesar Rp10,72 triliun untuk pelaksanaan program BSU tahun ini. Di tengah tantangan seperti inflasi dan ketidakpastian global, pemerintah berharap bantuan semacam ini bisa menjadi stimulan bagi masyarakat supaya tetap bisa menggerakkan roda ekonomi. Apakah pemberian BSU ini benar benar menjadi solusi jitu untuk menggerakkan perekonomian negara yang belakangan dianggap lesu? Dalam episode SuarAkademia terbaru, kami membahas isu ini bersama Jaya Darmawan, peneliti ekonomi dari Center of Economic and Law Studies (CELIOS). Jaya berpendapat BSU menjadi salah satu instrumen andalan pemerintah untuk merespons tekanan ekonomi yang dialami masyarakat kelas pekerja. Meskipun program BSU bermanfaat dalam jangka pendek, ia menganggap besaran bantuannya belum mampu mengimbangi tekanan ekonomi saat ini. Salah satu masalah yang menurut Jaya juga perlu disoroti adalah kriteria kelayakan penerima manfaat. Banyak pekerja tidak memenuhi syarat bantuan karena batasan administratif yang tidak mempertimbangkan kompleksitas kerja informal. kriteria penerima BSU ini membuat pekerja yang ada di sektor informal kerap luput dari jangkauan bantuan sosial, meskipun mereka berada dalam posisi paling rentan secara ekonomi. Meskipun kebijakan pemerintah ini perlu disambut dengan baik, namun Jaya beranggapan langkah-langkah ini masih belum cukup untuk mendorong daya beli masyarakat secara berkelanjutan. Ia berpendapat perlu ada pergeseran arah kebijakan dari sekadar bantuan jangka pendek menuju strategi jangka panjang yang lebih menyeluruh. Fokus kebijakan pemerintah sebaiknya tidak hanya memperbaiki daya beli secara sementara, tetapi juga membuka akses terhadap pekerjaan yang layak dan mendukung pekerja untuk keluar dari sektor informal. Menurutnya, pemerintah perlu memikirkan strategi yang lebih komprehensif untuk menciptakan kebijakan ekonomi yang tidak hanya responsif terhadap krisis, tetapi juga berorientasi pada transformasi sosial dan ekonomi yang berkelanjutan. Simak episode lengkapnya hanya di SuarAkademia—ngobrol seru isu terkini, bareng akademisi.

12/06/2025

•

33 min
08/03/2019

Mark Latham in the upper house? A Coalition minority government? The NSW election is nearly upon us and it’s going to be a wild ride

It's a fight for a rapidly vanishing centre, which will make passing bills difficult for whoever wins. Chris Pavlich/Dean Lewins(AAP)We are but weeks away from an election in New South Wales – polling day is on March 23 – and it will be eagerly watched. Not just for the outcome but for the implications for the looming federal election. That’s according to Dr Andy Marks, a political scientist from Western Sydney University, who tells us on the podcast today that this state election outcome may give us some clues on how some global political themes are playing out here in Australia. “It’s not just about state politics. Increasingly the Australian electoral cycles, federally and at the state level, are subject to changes in political dynamics internationally. We’re seeing the erosion of centrist politics around the world […] and that even affects humble New South Wales.” He predicts a weakened Nationals Party will be facing a strong challenge from the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party and that One Nation’s Mark Latham is almost a sure bet to win a spot in the NSW upper house. “I do think you’ll see a minority Coalition government returned but the really interesting play is what happens in the upper house. Currently, the Coalition have to deal with two to three independents or minor parties to get stuff over the line,” said Dr Marks. “I think what we’ll see in the coming parliament is that that the ranks of cross-benchers will expand quite dramatically, up to seven to nine cross-benchers. So that makes negotiations pretty fraught. "This is really going to be new territory,” he said. “We’ve got One Nation returning to the fold. Mark Latham, their number one ticket holder in the upper house, will get in. But potentially they’ll get two seats in the upper house. You’ll have an emboldened Shooters and Fishers Party. "So you really have a really broad field and it’s going to mean negotiating the passage of bills will be pretty difficult.” We also talked about: why East Hills (which takes in suburbs like Panania, Condell Park, the Bankstown aerodrome, Padstow, Revesby and others) is the most marginal seat in NSW how a plan to demolish and rebuild two stadiums turned into a political headache for NSW premier Gladys Berejiklian why Michael Daley, who took over from Luke Foley as NSW Labor leader late last year, is only now just making his mark how local issues in rural seats may end up deciding the fate of the state what it all means as we head into the May federal election. New to podcasts? Podcasts are often best enjoyed using a podcast app. All iPhones come with the Apple Podcasts app already installed, or you may want to listen and subscribe on another app such as Pocket Casts (click here to listen to Trust Me, I’m An Expert on Pocket Casts). You can also hear us on Stitcher, Spotify or any of the apps below. Just pick a service from one of those listed below and click on the icon to find Trust Me, I’m An Expert. Additional audio Kindergarten by Unkle Ho, from Elefant Traks ABC news report on 2GB interview 2GB interview clip. Image: Chris Pavlich/Dean Lewins(AAP)

08/03/2019

•

24 min
08/10/2018

Potensi energi angin di Indonesia begitu besar, mengapa kincirnya harus kecil

ENERGY.GOV/WIKIMEDIA, CC BY-SA Angin punya posisi penting bagi sejarah panjang peradaban manusia. Sekitar 7000 tahun lalu, angin tercatat telah memutar baling-baling kapal di sepanjang Sungai Nil di Mesir. Di Cina, 200 tahun sebelum Masehi, hembusan angin telah memutar kincir sederhana dan membantu petani memompa air. Sejak abad ke-20, angin telah menggerakan turbin dan menghasilkan listrik untuk rumah di Eropa dan Amerika Utara. Selain lebih murah, tenaga angin juga terbukti jauh lebih ramah terhadap lingkungan. Tapi mengapa Indonesia sepertinya sulit melakukan hal yang sama? Apa kita kekurangan angin? Adi Surjosatyo, Guru Besar Departemen Teknik Mesin Universitas Indonesia, mengatakan potensi Indonesia sangat besar. Tapi, menurut dia, selama ini kita telah keliru dalam memandang tenaga angin. Di Eropa, daerah kontinental, turbin angin dibuat besar karena angin besar. Tapi di daerah Indonesia, turbin angin harus kecil karena kondisi udara dan kelembapan air laut membuat angin di Indonesia kecil. Rata-rata kecepatan angin di Indonesia dua kali lebih lemah dari angin di Eropa. Hanya sekitar 2,5 sampai 3 meter per detik. Kecepatan angin rendah, kincirnya pun harus kecil. Itulah yang dilakukan oleh Adi di Kampung Bungin, Muara Gembong, Bekasi. Dia bikin energi terbarukan dari angin untuk mengaliri listrik kampung nelayan tersebut. Satu kincir angin setinggi 11 meter hanya butuh Rp 50 juta. Setelah memasang beberapa kincir di pinggir pantai, biarkan angin yang bekerja sepanjang waktu. Edisi ke-29 Sains Sekitar Kita ini disiapkan oleh Ikhsan Raharjo dan narator Malika. Selamat mendengarkan!

08/10/2018

•

6 min
28/11/2024

Kenaikan PPN 12 persen: apa dampaknya untuk perekonomian Indonesia?

Kenaikan Pajak Pertambahan Nilai (PPN) menjadi 12% hampir pasti bakal berlaku pada tahun 2025 mendatang. Kenaikkan ini merupakan mandat Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2021 tentang Harmonisasi Peraturan Perpajakan (UU HPP). PPN adalah instrumen fiskal yang mentarifi pembelian barang dan jasa hasil industri kepada masyarakat. Selain sudah jadi mandat undang-undang, Menteri Keuangan Sri Mulyani Indrawati mengklaim bahwa penyesuaian tarif ini juga bertujuan untuk meningkatkan daya saing Indonesia secara global, khususnya dengan rata-rata tarif PPN yang diterapkan oleh negara-negara anggota Organisasi untuk Kerja Sama dan Pembangunan Ekonomi (OECD). Saat ini, tarif PPN Indonesia masih lebih rendah dibandingkan rata-rata tarif pajak negara-negara dunia. Di tingkat teknis, Direktorat Jenderal Pajak Kementerian Keuangan sedang mengebut aturan teknis pemberlakuan tarif baru ini. Apakah kenaikan PPN ini akan berdampak terhadap perekonomian Indonesia? Adakah dampak yang akan dirasakan langsung oleh masyarakat? Dalam episode SuarAkademia terbaru, kami membahas isu ini dengan Jaya Darmawan, peneliti ekonomi dari Center of Economic and Law Studies (CELIOS). Jaya mengatakan kebijakan kenaikan PPN menjadi 12% ini mempelihatkan kurangnya sense of crisis dari pemerintah. Sebab situasi ekonomi masyarakat yang sedang sulit. Hal tersebut terlihat dari tren deflasi yang stabil terjadi beberapa bulan terakhir. Jaya berpendapat seharusnya pemerintah melihat situasi ekonomi masyarakat saat ini sebelum memutuskan untuk menaikkan tarif PPN. Meskipun tidak menampik kebijakan ini akan membuat penerimaan negara akan meningkat, namun Jaya melihat kebijakan ini bisa jadi bomerang yang jutru bisa kian memperlambat pertumbuhan ekonomi. Penurunan tersebut karena konsumsi penopang nilai produk domestik bruto Indonesia berpotensi akan mengalami penurunan. Alhasil, target pertumbuhan ekonomi yang dipatok pemerintahan Prabowo-Gibran sebesar 8% hanya menjadi janji kampanye semata tanpa realisasi nyata. Jaya menyarankan agar pemerintah harus mempertimbangkan menerapkan pajak yang adil, alih-alih meningkatkan PPN. Ia menambahkan, sudah banyak jurnal dan hasil riset yang menunjukkan dengan penerapan sistem pajak yang menggunakan prinsip berkeadilan dan tata kelola yang baik justru bisa memberikan negara pemasukan yang lebih banyak daripada menaikkan PPN saat ini. Simak episode lengkapnya hanya di SuarAkademia—ngobrol seru isu terkini, bareng akademisi.

28/11/2024

•

25 min

Listen to experts explain the world around us and tell the stories behind brand new research. Podcasts from The Conversation, an independent source of news and views, sourced from the academic and research community. Shows in English, French and Bahasa Indonesia. Free to listen.